AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomiyama, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomiyama, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:881-886
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Using the World Health Organization Classification of Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms to Describe CT Findings

Noriyuki Tomiyama1, Takeshi Johkoh2, Naoki Mihara2, Osamu Honda2, Takenori Kozuka2, Mitsuhiro Koyama2, Seiki Hamada2, Meinoshin Okumura3, Mitsunori Ohta3, Tadaaki Eimoto4, Masao Miyagawa1, Nestor L. Müller5, Junpei Ikezoe6 and Hironobu Nakamura2

1 Department of Radiology, Ehime National Hospital, 366, Yokogawara, Shigenobu, Ehime, 791-0281, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Osaka University Medical School, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
3 Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (E-1), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
4 Second Department of Pathology, Nagoya City University Medical School, Kawasumi, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan.
5 Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, 855 W. 12th Ave., Vancouver, B. C., V5Z 1M9, Canada.
6 Department of Radiology, Ehime University Medical School, Shizugawa, Shigenobu, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.

Received November 5, 2001; accepted after revision March 18, 2002.

 
Address correspondence to N. Tomiyama.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to assess the CT features of various subtypes of thymic epithelial neoplasms on the basis of the 1999 World Health Organization classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thymic epithelial neoplasms in 53 patients who underwent thymectomy were retrospectively assessed histologically according to the 1999 World Health Organization classification. Type A and B neoplasms correspond to thymomas and type C, to thymic carcinoma. The study included four patients with type A, 14 with type AB, nine with type B1, 14 with type B2, four with type B3, and eight with type C epithelial tumors. Two observers independently assessed the CT scans without knowledge of the histologic findings.

RESULTS. Type A tumors were more likely to have smooth contours on CT (4/4, 100%) and round shapes (3.5/4, 88%) than any other type of thymic epithelial tumor (all, p < 0.05). Type C tumors had a higher prevalence of irregular contours (6/8, 75%) than any other type of thymic epithelial tumor (all, p < 0.05). Calcification was more frequently seen in type B1 (4/9, 44%), type B2 (8.5/14, 61%), and type B3 (3/4, 75%) tumors than in type AB (2/14, 14%) and type C (0.5/8, 6%) tumors (all, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION. Smooth contours and a round shape are most suggestive of type A thymic epithelial tumor, whereas irregular contours are most suggestive of type C tumor. Calcification is suggestive of type B tumors. CT is of limited value, however, in differentiating type AB, B1, B2, and B3 tumors.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Thymic epithelial tumors have been traditionally classified into two main types: thymoma, which may be encapsulated or invasive and is histologically benign; and thymic carcinoma, which is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that are histologically malignant. The prognosis of patients with thymomas varies considerably. Therefore, several classifications have been proposed for these tumors [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The classifications were aimed at reflecting invasiveness and prognosis [11,12,13,14]. However, there have been major criticisms of the various classifications and a lack of consensus on their value in prognosis [15,16,17]. More recently, a simple classification of the thymic epithelial tumors into thymoma, atypical thymoma, and thymic carcinoma has been proposed [18].

In 1999, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed a consensus classification of thymic epithelial tumors [19]. This classification takes into account the morphology of epithelial cells as well as the ratio of epithelial cells to lymphocytes. It was recently reported that the WHO histologic classification reflects both the clinical and the functional features of thymic epithelial tumors [20]. Furthermore, histologic appearance reflects the oncologic behavior of thymoma if this novel classification system is used. Thus, the WHO histologic classification system may contribute to the clinical practice for the assessment and treatment of patients with thymoma [21]. On the basis of the previously reported results, the preoperative diagnosis according to the WHO histologic classification system should have an important implication in determining treatment strategy.

The aim of our study was to assess the CT features of the various subtypes of thymic epithelial tumors in the WHO classification.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
CT images were available for retrospective review in 55 patients with thymic epithelial tumors who underwent CT of the chest at our institution on a variety of scanners as part of patient evaluations between April 1990 and October 2000. Two of the 55 patients with thymic cancer diagnosed at biopsy, who received chemotherapy and radiation but not surgical resection because of metastasis, were excluded from the analysis. The remaining 53 patients in whom a definitive diagnosis of thymic epithelial tumors was established by thymectomy formed the basis of our study (27 men and 26 women; age range, 26-74 years; mean, 52.3 years).

The surgical specimens were reviewed by an experienced pathologist, and the tumors were divided into six subtypes on the basis of the 1999 WHO classification. This classification is as follows: type A, tumor composed of a homogeneous population of neoplastic epithelial cells having spindle and oval shapes, lacking nuclear atypia, and accompanied by few or no nonneoplastic lymphocytes; type AB, tumor in which foci having the features of type A thymoma are admixed with foci rich in lymphocytes, with sharp or indistinct segregation of the two patterns; type B1, tumor that resembles the normal functional thymus in that it combines large expanses having an appearance practically indistinguishable from normal thymic cortex with areas resembling thymic medulla; type B2, tumor in which the neoplastic epithelial component appears as scattered plump cells with vesicular nuclei and distinct nucleoli among a predominant population of lymphocytes (perivascular spaces are common); type B3, tumor predominantly composed of epithelial cells having a round or polygonal shape and exhibiting mild atypia, admixed with a minor component of lymphocytes (foci of squamous metaplasia and perivascular spaces are common); type C, tumor exhibiting clear-cut cytologic atypia and a set of cytoarchitectural features no longer specific to thymus, but rather analogous to those seen in carcinomas of other organs. The classification of type A, AB, B1, and B2 tumors does not specify which tumor types are encapsulated thymomas and invasive thymomas, but the classification of type B3 and C tumors corresponds to atypical thymoma and thymic carcinoma, respectively. All tumors were staged on the basis of the presence and extent of transcapsular invasion into adjacent mediastinal tissues as determined by surgical findings and confirmed at microscopic examination [22].

CT of the abnormal areas consisted of 3- to 10-mm-collimation sections. Protocols consisted of 10-mm-collimation contiguous sections through the thorax (14 patients), 7-mm collimation (five patients), or 5-mm collimation (34 patients). In 11 of the 34 patients with images obtained using 5-mm-collimation sections, additional images with 3-mm-collimation sections of the tumor were obtained. IV-administered contrast medium was used in all patients. The time interval between CT and thymectomy was 1-112 days (median, 19 days).

CT scans were randomized and then reviewed separately by two independent chest radiologists. The observers were aware that the patients had thymic epithelial tumors but did not know histologic subtypes.

CT scans were assessed for the size (short and long axis), contour, shape, attenuation of the tumor, presence of focal areas of low attenuation in the tumor, and presence of calcification in the tumor. The shape was classified as round if the long- to short-axis ratio was less than 1.5, oval if the ratio was equal to 1.5 or greater and less than 3.0, and plaque if the ratio was equal to or greater than 3.0. The distribution and location of calcification were noted. The distribution of calcification was classified as focal or multifocal. The location of calcification was classified as central if there was a predilection of abnormalities in the inner third of the tumor, peripheral if there was a predominance of abnormalities in the outer third of the tumor, and random if there was no predominance. The pattern of enhancement was recorded as homogeneous or heterogeneous, and the degree of enhancement was evaluated as less than that of chest wall muscle, equal to that of chest wall muscle, and higher than that of chest wall muscle by visual estimation. The presence of pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, and mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy (short-axis diameter > 10 mm) was also assessed.

The differences in the prevalence of each CT finding among WHO histologic types were analyzed using the chi-square test; when small numbers invalidated the chi-square approximation, the Fisher's exact test was used. The differences in size among WHO histologic types were assessed using Scheffe's F test. The data used for analysis were averages of values for the two observers.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The 53 primary tumors included 45 thymomas (four of type A, 14 of type AB, nine of type B1, 14 of type B2, four of type B3), and eight thymic carcinomas (type C) (Table 1). The proportion of invasive tumors with reference to WHO classification was 25%, 43%, 44%, 71%, 100%, and 100% in type A, AB, B1, B2, B3, and C tumors, respectively (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Clinical Stage and Incidence of Invasive Tumors According to the World Health Organization Classification [19]

 

Long- and short-axis diameters (mean ± SD) of tumors in each WHO histologic type were 2.75 ± 0.46 cm, 2.15 ± 0.49 cm in type A; 5.49 ± 1.68 cm, 3.72 ± 1.58 cm in type AB; 5.14 ± 2.11 cm, 3.13 ± 1.29 cm in type B1; 3.97 ± 1.14 cm, 2.39 ± 0.67 cm in type B2; 5.13 ± 3.06 cm, 3.28 ± 1.13 cm in type B3; and 6.59 ± 2.29 cm, 4.06 ± 1.99 cm in type C tumors, respectively. Long- and short-axis diameters of type C tumors were significantly greater than those of type A and B2 tumors (p < 0.01).

Type A tumors were more likely to have smooth contours (4/4, 100%) and a round shape (3.5/4, 88%) (Fig. 1A,1B) than type AB (6.5/14, 46% and 1/14, 7%, respectively) (Fig. 2A,2B); type B1 (3.5/9, 39% and 0/9, 0%, respectively) (Fig. 3A,3B); type B2 (4.5/14, 32% and 1/14, 7%, respectively); type B3 (0.5/4, 13%, and 0.5/4, 13%, respectively); and type C tumor (1/8, 13% and 1.5/8, 19%, respectively) (all, p < 0.05) (average of two observers) (Table 2). Type C tumors had a higher prevalence of irregular contours (6/8, 75%) than type A (0/4, 0%), type AB (1/14, 7%), type B1 (1/9, 11%), type B2 (2.5/14, 18%), and type B3 tumors (0.5/4, 13%) (all, p < 0.05). Calcification was more frequently seen in type B1 (4/9, 44%), type B2 (8.5/14, 61%) (Fig. 4A,4B), and type B3 tumors (3/4, 75%) than in type AB (2/14, 14%) and type C tumors (0.5/8, 6%) (all, p < 0.05). Heterogeneous enhancement was more often seen in type B3 (3/4, 75%) (Fig. 5A,5B) and type C tumors (7/8, 87%) than in type A (0.5/4, 12%), type AB (3.5/14, 25%), type B1 (3/9, 33%), and type B2 tumors (3.5/14, 25%) (all, p < 0.05). Pleural effusions were found in one (7%) of 14 cases of type AB, one (11%) of nine cases of type B1, and three (38%) of eight cases of type C; pericardial effusions were found in one (7%) of 14 cases of type AB and in three (38%) of eight of cases of type C. Mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy was seen in one (7%) of 14 cases of type AB and 3.5 (43%) of eight cases of type C tumors (Fig. 6A,6B), but not in any other types of thymoma. Metastasis of mediastinal lymph nodes removed at surgery were confirmed in one (type AB) of 45 cases of thymoma and four of eight cases of thymic cancer (type C) histopathologically.



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. Type A tumor in 57-year-old woman. Contrast-enhanced CT scan (5-mm collimation) obtained at level of azygos arch shows homogeneous anterior mediastinum mass with smooth contours and round shape. Mass was confirmed histopathologically as noninvasive thymoma (stage I, encapsulated thymoma).

 


View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. Type A tumor in 57-year-old woman. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows spindle tumor cells (arrows) with no nuclear atypia (spindle cell type). Note small number of lymphocytes. (H and E, x200)

 


View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. Type AB tumor in 55-year-old woman. Contrast-enhanced CT scan (3-mm collimation) obtained at level of aortic arch shows oval mass in anterior mediastinum. Mass shows homogeneous enhancement with slightly higher attenuation than that of chest wall muscles.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. Type AB tumor in 55-year-old woman. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows lymphocyte-rich tumor with spindle (arrows) to oval (arrowheads) tumor epithelial cells (mixed type). Mass was confirmed histopathologically as noninvasive thymoma (stage I, encapsulated thymoma). (H and E, x200)

 


View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. Type B1 tumor in 26-year-old woman. Contrast-enhanced CT scan (7-mm collimation) obtained at right main pulmonary artery level shows mass at anterior mediastinum. Note smooth contours and oval shape of mass, which enhances heterogeneously with low attenuation.

 


View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. Type B1 tumor in 26-year-old woman. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows predominance of lymphocytes and scattered tumor epithelial cells (arrows), resembling thymic cortex (lymphocyte-rich type). Mass was confirmed histopathologically as noninvasive thymoma (stage I, encapsulated thymoma). (H and E, x200)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 CT Findings of Thymic Epithelial Tumors Based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification [19]

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. Type B2 tumor in 35-year-old man. Contrast-enhanced CT scan (5-mm collimation) obtained at carinal level shows slightly heterogeneous anterior mediastinum mass with plaque shape. Mass contains punctate peripheral calcification (arrow). Invasion of pericardium was confirmed at surgery (stage III, invasive thymoma).

 


View larger version (176K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. Type B2 tumor in 35-year-old man. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows moderate lymphocyte infiltration and plump tumor cells (arrows) with vesicular nuclei and distinct nucleoli (cortical type). (H and E, x200)

 


View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A. Type B3 tumor in 74-year-old man. Contrast-enhanced CT scan (7-mm collimation) obtained at carinal level shows lobulated contour mass at anterior mediastinum. Mass shows heterogeneous enhancement with multiple areas of decreased attenuation. Invasion of left lung and pericardium was confirmed at surgery (stage III, invasive thymoma).

 


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B. Type B3 tumor in 74-year-old man. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows sheet of tumor epithelial cells (arrows) with small number of lymphocytes and perivascular space (arrowhead) (well-differentiated thymic carcinoma). (H and E, x200)

 


View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A. Type C tumor in 73-year-old man. Contrast-enhanced CT scan (3-mm collimation) obtained at carinal level shows heterogeneous anterior mediastinum mass with irregular contour. Note enlarged lymph node in right hilum (arrow). Invasion of right lung and pericardium and metastasis to right hilar node were confirmed at surgery (stage III, invasive thymoma).

 


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B. Type C tumor in 73-year-old man. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows nests of thymic carcinoma cells with atypical nuclei and with some squamous differentiation (i.e., intercellular bridges [arrows]) (thymic carcinoma). (H and E, x200)

 

The combination of homogeneous enhancement and a high degree of enhancement was seen in three (75%) of four cases of type A, nine (64%) of 14 cases of type AB, 1.5 (17%) of nine cases of type B1, three (21%) of 14 cases of type B2, zero (0%) of four cases of type B3, and zero (0%) of eight cases of type C tumors.

Agreement on the findings seen on each CT scan between two observers was 44 (83%) of 53 for contour, 43 (81%) of 53 for shape, 46 (87%) of 53 for attenuation of the tumor, 45 (85%) of 53 for low attenuation in the tumor, 51 (96%) of 53 for presence of calcification within the tumor, 51 (96%) of 53 for presence of pleural effusion, 47 (89%) of 53 for presence of pericardial effusion, 49 (92%) of 53 for presence of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy, 50 (94%) of 53 regarding the pattern of enhancement, and 44 (83%) of 53 for the degree of enhancement.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The 1999 WHO consensus classification of the thymic epithelial tumors is based on the morphology of epithelial cells and the ratio of epithelial cells to lymphocytes [19]. The relationship of the WHO classification and previous histologic classifications is as follows: type A corresponds to spindle cell type or medullary type thymoma; AB corresponds to mixed type; B1 corresponds to lymphocyte-rich type, lymphocytic type, predominantly cortical type, or organoid type; B2 corresponds to cortical type; B3 corresponds to epithelial type, squamoid type, or atypical thymoma, well-differentiated thymic carcinoma; and type C corresponds to thymic carcinoma.

The WHO histologic classification has been shown to reflect the clinical features of thymic epithelial tumors and to correlate with prognosis [20, 21]. The preoperative prediction of WHO histologic subtypes of thymic tumors may help clinical practice in the following situations: first, because type A, AB, or B1 thymomas have a less aggressive nature than type B2 or B3 thymomas, type A, Ab, or B1 thymomas have more chances of complete resection than type B2 or B3 thymomas, even when CT findings suggest tumor invasion to the surrounding organs. Therefore, patients with type A, AB, or B1 thymomas could be primarily treated by surgical resection, whereas patients with type B2 or B3 thymomas might require preoperative induction chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Second, because type A thymoma is the least invasive tumor, endoscopic surgery might be adopted more reasonably than with other types of thymomas. Third, although even subtotal resection of tumor contributes to the survival of patients with thymomas (type A, AB, B1, B2, or B3 tmors) when adequate adjuvant therapy is added, long-term survival cannot be expected for patients with thymic carcinoma (type C tumor, in case of incomplete resection). Thus, type C tumors require the exact preoperative diagnosis when involvement of the surrounding organs is suspected. Therefore, prediction of type C tumor by CT findings seems important to the recommendation of preoperative biopsy, such as needle biopsy.

In our study, smooth contours were present in all type A tumors, and the prevalence was decreasing from type A, AB, B1, B2, B3, to C tumors. Irregular contours were seen in none of type A tumors and in a small number of type AB, B1, B2, and B3 tumors, and irregular contours were found in 75% of type C tumors. It is reported that irregular tumor margin is suggestive of capsular invasion of thymoma (i.e., invasive thymoma and thymic carcinoma) [23, 24].

Jung et al. [25] found that atypical thymomas were significantly smaller than thymic carcinomas. In our study, long- and short-axis diameters of type C tumor were significantly longer than those of type A and B2 tumors, but there was no significant difference between type C tumors and type AB, B1, and B3 tumors.

Sone et al. [26] found a higher prevalence of calcification in invasive thymomas. In that study, calcification was present in four of 10 invasive thymomas and in none of the lesions of the seven patients with noninvasive thymoma. Recently, Tomiyama et al. [27] reported that calcification was found in 14.5 (54%) of 27 cases of invasive thymomas and six (26%) of 23 cases of noninvasive thymomas. In our study, calcification was found in 44% of type B1, 61% of type B2, and 75% of type B3 tumors. Do et al. [28] reported that calcification was found in one (10%) of 10 cases of thymic carcinoma and two (17%) of 12 cases of invasive thymoma. Jung et al. [25] reported calcification to be found in three (33%) of nine cases of atypical thymoma and 11 (61%) of 18 cases of thymic carcinoma. In our study, calcification was found in only 6% of type C tumors, which corresponds to that of thymic carcinomas, and the prevalence of calcification was lower than in any type of thymic epithelial tumors.

In our study, areas of low attenuation were seen in 61% of type B1, 75% of type B3, and 63% of type C tumors. Tomiyama et al. [27] reported that areas of low attenuation were found significantly more often in patients with invasive thymoma than in patients with noninvasive thymoma. Although it is not clear why the prevalence of areas of low attenuation in type B2 tumors was low compared with that of type B1 and B3 tumors, areas of low attenuation were found significantly more often in patients with type B1, B3, and C tumors, which have a greater malignant potential than type A tumors.

Do et al. [28] reported that mediastinal lymphadenopathy was found in four (40%) of 10 cases of thymic carcinoma and one (8%) of 12 cases of invasive thymoma, and thymic carcinoma was more commonly associated with mediastinal nodes than invasive thymoma. Jung et al. [25] also reported that lymph node enlargement was found in eight (44%) of 18 cases of thymic carcinoma and in zero (0%) of nine cases of invasive thymoma; there was a significant difference between the two. The results of our study are similar, mediastinal lymphadenopathy being present in 43% of type C tumors, 7% of type AB, but not in any other types of thymic epithelial tumors.

Morgenthaler et al. [29] reported that attenuation is more heterogeneous in invasive thymoma after IV administration of contrast material. Tomiyama et al. [27] reported that homogeneous enhancement was found in 11 (41%) of 27 cases of invasive thymoma and 15 (65%) of 23 cases of noninvasive thymoma (p < 0.05). Enhancement degree whether less than, equal to, or greater than that of chest wall muscle was seen with similar frequency in noninvasive and invasive thymomas. In our study, heterogeneous enhancement was found in 75% of type B3 and 88% of type C tumors and in approximately 10-30% in other types of thymomas. Heterogeneous enhancement was present significantly more often in patients with type B3 thymoma and in those with type C thymoma (thymic carcinoma). A high degree of enhancement was found in 88% of type A, 86% of type AB, 75% of type B3, and 69% of type C tumors, and it was more often seen in these tumors than in type B1 and B2 tumors. Although the reason for the low enhancement of type B1 and B2 is not clear, it is conceivably related to the fact that these subtypes of thymoma are both lymphocyte-rich tumors.

Our study has several limitations. Some factors, including variation in section thickness, low numbers of each type of tumor, visual estimation of the image, observer variation, and the extensive delay between CT and surgery in some patients, could have affected interpretive outcome such as evaluation of presence of calcification in the tumor, degree of enhancement, and potential changes in tumor size and histology. Moreover our study is a retrospective review of charts rather than a prospective identification of each tumor type.

In conclusion, smooth contours and a round shape are most suggestive of type A tumor. Irregular contours and mediastinal lymphadenopathy are most suggestive of type C tumor. Calcification is suggestive of type B1, B2, and B3 tumors. The combination of homogeneous enhancement and a high degree of enhancement is suggestive of type A and AB tumors. CT is of limited value, however, in differentiating type AB, B1, B2, and B3 tumors.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Bernatz PE, Harrison EG, Clagett OT. Thymoma: a clinicopathologic study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1961;42:424 -444[Medline]
  2. Rosai J, Levine GD. Tumors of the thymus: atlas of tumor pathology, 2nd series, vol. 13. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1976
  3. Shimosato Y, Kameya T, Nagai K, Suemasu K. Squamous cell carcinoma of the thymus: an analysis of eight cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1977;1:109 -121[Medline]
  4. Levine GD, Rosai J. Thymic hyperplasia and neoplasia: a review of current concepts. Hum Pathol 1978;9:495 -515[Medline]
  5. Snover DC, Levine GD, Rosai J. Thymic carcinoma: five distinctive histological variants. Am J Surg Pathol 1982;6:451 -470[Medline]
  6. Suster S, Rosai J. Thymic carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 60 cases. Cancer 1991;67:1025 -1032[Medline]
  7. Wick MR, Weiland LH, Scheithauer BW, Bernatz PE. Primary thymic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 1982;6:613 -630[Medline]
  8. Müller-Hermelink HK, Marino M, Palestro G, Schumacher U, Kirchner T. Immunohistological evidences of cortical and medullary differentiation in thymoma. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1985;408:143 -161[Medline]
  9. Müller-Hermelink HK, Marino M, Palestro G. Pathology of thymic epithelial tumors. Curr Top Pathol 1986;75:207 -268[Medline]
  10. Kirchner T, Schalke B, Buchwald J, Ritter M, Marx A, Müller-Hermelink HK. Well-differentiated thymic carcinoma: an organotypical low-grade carcinoma with relationship to cortical thymoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1992;16:1153 -1169[Medline]
  11. Harris NL, Müller-Hermelink HK. Thymoma classification: a siren's song of simplicity. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;112:299 -303[Medline]
  12. Kirchner T, Schalke B, Marx A, Müller-Hermelink HK. Evaluation of prognostic features in thymic epithelial tumors. Thymus 1989;14:195 -203[Medline]
  13. Quintanilla-Martinez L, Wilkins EW Jr, Choi N, Efird J, Hug E, Harris NL. Thymoma: histologic subclassification is an independent prognostic factor. Cancer 1994;74:606 -617[Medline]
  14. Quintanilla-Martinez L, Wilkins EW Jr, Ferry JA, Harris NL. Thymoma: morphologic subclassification correlates with invasiveness and immunohistologic features—a study of 122 cases. Hum Pathol 1993;24:958 -969[Medline]
  15. Kornstein MJ. Thymoma classification: my opinion. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;112:304 -307[Medline]
  16. Shimosato Y, Mukai K. Tumors of the mediastinum: atlas of tumor pathology, 3rd series, vol. 21. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1997
  17. Suster S, Moran CA. Thymoma classification: the ride of the valkyries? Am J Clin Pathol 1999;112:308 -310[Medline]
  18. Suster S, Moran CA. Thymoma, atypical thymoma, and thymic carcinoma: a novel conceptual approach to the classification of thymic epithelial neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;111:826 -833[Medline]
  19. Rosai J, Sobin LH. Histological typing of tumours of the thymus: international histological classification of tumours, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 1999
  20. Okumura M, Miyoshi S, Fujii Y, et al. Clinical and functional significance of WHO classification on human thymic epithelial neoplasms: a study of consecutive 146 tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:103 -110[Medline]
  21. Okumura M, Ohta M, Tateyama H, et al. The World Health Organization histologic classification system reflects the oncological behavior of thymoma: a clinical study of 273 patients. Cancer 2002;94:624 -632[Medline]
  22. Masaoka A, Monden Y, Nakahara K, Tanioka T. Follow-up study of thymomas with special reference to their clinical stages. Cancer 1981;48:2485 -2492[Medline]
  23. Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Galobardes J, Moran CA. Thymoma: radiologic—pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1992;12:151 -168[Abstract]
  24. Strollo DC, Rosado-de-Christenson ML. Tumors of the thymus. J Thorac Imaging 1999;14:152 -171[Medline]
  25. Jung KJ, Lee KS, Han J, Kim J, Kim TS, Kim EA. Malignant thymic epithelial tumors: CT—pathologic correlation. AJR 2001;176:433 -439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Sone S, Higashihara T, Morimoto S, et al. CT of thymoma [in Japanese]. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 1982;42:731 -739[Medline]
  27. Tomiyama N, Müller NL, Ellis SJ, et al. Invasive and non-invasive thymoma: distinctive CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:388 -393[Medline]
  28. Do YS, Im JG, Lee BH, et al. CT findings in malignant tumors of thymic epithelium. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:192 -197[Medline]
  29. Morgenthaler TI, Brown LR, Colby TV, Harper CM, Coles DT. Thymoma. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:1110 -1123[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
H. El-Bawab, A. A. Al-Sugair, M. Rafay, W. Hajjar, M. Mahdy, and K. Al-Kattan
Role of flourine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in thymic pathology
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 731 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Y. M. Sung, K. S. Lee, B.-T. Kim, J. Y. Choi, Y. M. Shim, and C. A. Yi
18F-FDG PET/CT of Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Usefulness for Distinguishing and Staging Tumor Subgroups
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 1628 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. F. Riedel and W. R. Burfeind Jr
Thymoma: Benign Appearance, Malignant Potential
Oncologist, September 1, 2006; 11(8): 887 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Nishino, S. K. Ashiku, O. N. Kocher, R. L. Thurer, P. M. Boiselle, and H. Hatabu
The thymus: a comprehensive review.
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 335 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. J. Jeong, K. S. Lee, J. Kim, Y. M. Shim, J. Han, and O J. Kwon
Does CT of Thymic Epithelial Tumors Enable Us to Differentiate Histologic Subtypes and Predict Prognosis?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomiyama, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomiyama, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS