AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giesler, T.
Right arrow Articles by Achenbach, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giesler, T.
Right arrow Articles by Achenbach, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:911-916
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Noninvasive Visualization of Coronary Arteries Using Contrast-Enhanced Multidetector CT: Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Stenosis Detection

Tom Giesler1, Ulrich Baum2, Dieter Ropers1, Stefan Ulzheimer3, Evelyn Wenkel2, Maria Mennicke1, Werner Bautz2, Willi A. Kalender3, Werner G. Daniel1 and Stephan Achenbach1

1 Department of Internal Medicine II, Universität Erlangen-Nuernberg, Ulmenweg 18, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
2 Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Universität Erlangen-Nuernberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
3 Institute of Medical Physics, Universität Erlangen-Nuernberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Received February 20, 2002; accepted after revision April 3, 2002.

 
Supported by a grant from the ELAN Program, University of Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Address correspondence to T. Giesler.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Although multidetector CT (MDCT) with retrospectively ECG-gated image reconstruction has been shown to permit noninvasive visualization of the coronary arteries, the 125-250 msec required for image acquisition frequently causes motion artifacts. We investigated the influence of a patient's heart rate on the presence of motion artifacts and on accuracy of stenosis detection on contrast-enhanced MDCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. In 100 patients, MDCT was performed, and ECG-gated cross-sectional images were retrospectively reconstructed. From the 10 data sets obtained for each patient (reconstructed at 0-90% of the cardiac cycle in increments of 10%), we chose the best data set for every coronary artery. The images of the arteries were evaluated for occurrence of artifacts and the presence of high-grade stenosis (diameter reduction exceeding 70%) or occlusions. MDCT results were compared with coronary angiographic findings.

RESULTS. Of the 400 coronary arteries, 115 (29%) could not be evaluated because of motion artifacts (n = 84) or other reasons (n = 31). Overall, 51 (49%) of 104 stenoses were revealed on MDCT. For detecting stenosis in those arteries that we could evaluate, MDCT had a sensitivity of 91% (51 of 56 stenoses detected) and a specificity of 89%. As the heart rate increased, the number of arteries that could be evaluated decreased, and overall sensitivity for stenosis detection decreased from 62% (heart rate <= 70 beats per minute) to 33% (heart rate > 70 beats per minute).

CONCLUSION. MDCT can reveal coronary stenoses, but the usefulness of MDCT as an aid in accurately evaluating stenoses decreases as a patient's heart rate increases.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Conventional invasive coronary angiography constitutes the clinical gold standard for detection of coronary artery stenoses. However, the risk of potentially serious adverse effects and the associated costs have led to an intensive search for noninvasive alternatives. It has recently been shown that multidetector CT (MDCT) in combination with retrospective ECG-gating permits visualization of the coronary artery lumen [1,2,3] and detection of coronary artery stenoses [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The latest generation of MDCT scanners acquires images in up to four parallel slices with a gantry rotation time of 500 msec. Through the use of the simultaneously recorded ECG data, images can be reconstructed at any second of the cardiac cycle with a data acquisition window of approximately 125-250 msec, depending on a patient's heart rate [13,14,15]. However, the temporal resolution frequently does not completely eliminate motion artifacts [9,10,11,12]. We studied 100 patients to assess the influence of heart rate on the presence of motion artifacts and on accuracy in detecting coronary artery stenoses.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
One hundred consecutive patients who had been referred for invasive coronary angiography were studied (77 men and 23 women; age range, 39-83 years; mean age ± SD, 63 ± 10 years; weight range, 58-123 kg; mean weight, 81 ± 13 kg). Only patients with sinus rhythm were included. Patients who were pregnant or who had an unstable clinical condition, severe renal failure, previous allergic reactions to iodinated contrast agent, thyroid disease, or any circumstances that would not allow the patient to lie in the supine position were excluded. Patients who had coronary stents or who had undergone previous bypass surgery were also excluded. All patients gave written informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the institutional review board. Data from the first 64 patients in our series were included in a prior analysis of the performance of MDCT in revealing coronary artery stenoses [9].

Multidetector CT (MDCT)
MDCT was performed using a Somatom Volume Zoom scanner (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) according to a previously described protocol [1]. Patients were examined in the supine position, and all image acquisitions were performed during inspiratory breath-hold. To reduce the heart rate, a ß-blocker (50 mg of metoprolol) was administered orally 2 hr before the examination in the last 36 patients to provide comparison data between this group and the first 64 patients. After determining the contrast agent transit time [1], we acquired MDCT data during an IV injection of 160 mL of the iodinated contrast agent iopromid (Ultravist 370; Schering, Berlin, Germany) at a rate of 4 mL/sec. The following scanning protocol was used: collimation, 4 x 1 mm; gantry rotation time, 500 msec; and table feed, 1.5 mm/rotation. The tube current was 150 mA at 140 kV to keep the radiation dose within a reasonable range. A delay corresponding to the measured contrast agent transit time was kept between the initiation of the contrast agent injection and the start of the acquisition. The breath-hold time was between 30 and 40 sec, depending on the scanning volume.

For image reconstruction, we processed the raw CT data on a separate workstation (ImpactIR; VAMP, Möhrendorf, Germany). Using retrospective ECG-gating and the 180° multislice cardiac interpolation algorithm [13], we reconstructed cross-sectional images with a slice thickness of 1.2-1.4 mm in 1-mm intervals to obtain image acquisition windows of 125-250 msec (full width at one-tenth maximum of the phase-contribution profile) [13], depending on a patient's heart rate [1]. The field of view was 180 mm with an image matrix of 512 x 512 pixels. For each patient, we created 10 data sets evenly spaced throughout the cardiac cycle (0-90% of the R wave—to—R wave interval). We inspected all data sets and, for each coronary artery, selected the data set that contained the fewest motion artifacts for further evaluation.

Using an off-line workstation (NetraMD; ScImage, Los Altos, CA), an independent reviewer who was unaware of the clinical condition or the invasive coronary angiographic findings of the patients evaluated the MDCT images. The coronary arteries were classified as "assessable" or "nonassessable" on the basis of the cross-sectional images, sliding thin-slab maximum intensity projections [16], multiplanar reconstructions, and three-dimensional reconstructions. The images of the arteries that could be assessed were examined for the presence of high-grade stenoses (diameter reduction exceeding 70%) and occlusions. Results were documented separately for the four major epicardial arteries (left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery). Side branches with a diameter equal to or greater than 2 mm were included in the analysis of the respective coronary artery (e.g., a stenosis detected in a diagonal branch would be documented as stenosis of the left anterior descending artery).

Quantitative Coronary Angiography
Coronary angiograms were obtained in all patients 1 to 3 days after MDCT. Lesion severity was evaluated using a digital analysis system (Quant-Cor.QCA version 2.0; Siemens) that was based on the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System II (CAAS II; Pie Medical Imaging, Maastricht, The Netherlands). The automated edge detection of the system has been validated and described elsewhere [17, 18]. The tip of the 5-French or 6-French angiography catheter was used as a calibration device. The luminal edges were detected using a weighted sum of the first- and second-derivative functions of the brightness profile perpendicular to the center line of the vessel, and the vessel diameter was determined by computing the shortest distance between the right and left contours. The percentage of diameter stenosis and the interpolated reference diameter were averaged across two orthogonal projections. Lesions with a mean diameter reduction of 70% or more were considered high-grade stenoses. In addition, the reference diameter of every lesion was documented because only lesions in vessel segments with a lumen diameter of 2 mm or more were included in the analysis.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In all 100 patients, MDCT was successfully completed without complications. The mean heart rate was 69 ± 13 beats/min (range, 42-115 beats/min). Sixty of the patients examined had a heart rate of 70 beats/min or less, and 40 patients had a heart rate of more than 70 beats/min. The use of the ß-blocker in the last 36 patients participating in our study significantly decreased the heart rate during scanning (72 ± 14 beats/min without ß-blocker compared with 65 ± 10 beats/min with ß-blocker, p < 0.01).

The optimal position of the imaging window for clear visualization of the coronary arteries varied considerably from patient to patient (Table 1). Although the mid to late diastole cardiac phase frequently yielded the best image quality of left main, left anterior descending, and left circumflex arteries, the optimal position to clearly visualize the right coronary artery was more evenly distributed over late systole, early diastole, and mid to late diastole. The heart rate strongly influenced the optimal cardiac phase (Table 2). The best imaging window in patients with a heart rate of 70 beats/min or less was usually during mid to late diastole. Because of the shorter duration of diastolic relaxation, the optimal cardiac phase to visualize the coronary arteries in patients with a heart rate of more than 70 beats/min was more frequently during late systole and early diastole.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Optimal Position of Data Reconstruction Window in Cardiac Cyclea

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Optimal Position of Data Reconstruction Window in Cardiac Cyclea

 

Of 400 coronary arteries studied, 285 (71%) could be evaluated for the presence of occlusions or stenoses. In 39 patients (39%), all coronary arteries were assessable by MDCT. One hundred and fifteen (29%) of 400 coronary arteries were judged to be unassessable because of motion artifacts (84/115) or other reasons, such as severe calcification or incomplete breath-holding by the patient (31/115). The right coronary artery was more frequently affected by degraded image quality (48 patients) than were the other arteries (left main, 8 patients; left anterior descending, 24 patients; and left circumflex, 35 patients; p < 0.05). In the 60 patients with a heart rate of 70 beats/min or less, only 31 (13%) of 240 coronary arteries were affected by motion artifacts, whereas in the 40 patients with a heart rate of more than 70 beats/min, 53 (33%) of 160 arteries were degraded by motion artifacts (p < 0.001) (Figs. 1A,1B,1C,1D,2,3).



View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. Cross-sectional multidetector CT (MDCT) of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Cross-sectional MDCT scan of 70-year-old man shows proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (arrow) without motion artifacts. Heart rate was 67 beats/min.

 


View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. Cross-sectional multidetector CT (MDCT) of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Cross-sectional MDCT scan of 67-year-old man shows mid right coronary artery (arrow) without motion artifacts. Heart rate was 62 beats/min.

 


View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. Cross-sectional multidetector CT (MDCT) of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Cross-sectional MDCT scan of 66-year-old man shows proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. Visualization of artery is affected by severe motion artifact (arrow). Heart rate was 89 beats/min.

 


View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. Cross-sectional multidetector CT (MDCT) of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Cross-sectional MDCT scan of 74-year-old man shows mid right coronary artery, visualization of which is severely affected by motion artifact (arrow). Heart rate was 78 beats/min.

 


View larger version (179K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Multiplanar multidetector reconstruction of 62-year-old woman with suspected coronary artery disease shows clearly visualized right coronary artery with no motion artifacts up to the distal segments. Heart rate was 59 beats/min.

 


View larger version (175K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Multiplanar multidetector reconstruction of 51-year-old man with suspected coronary artery disease shows right coronary artery. Motion artifacts are visible (arrows). Heart rate was 72 beats/min.

 

MDCT revealed 51 (49%) of 104 high-grade stenoses (diameter reduction >= 70%) and occlusions in the coronary arteries (including their side branches with a diameter >= 2 mm). The overall sensitivity for stenosis detection in assessable and nonassessable arteries decreased from 62% (36/58) in patients with a heart rate of 70 beats/min or less to 33% (15/46) in patients with a heart rate of more than 70 beats/min (p < 0.01) (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Influence of Patient's Heart Rate on Image Quality of Multidetector CT Scans

 

In the 285 assessable coronary arteries, all 11 occlusions and 40 of 45 high-grade stenoses were correctly identified on MDCT (Figs. 4A,4B and 5A,5B). The only lesion present in the left main artery, 30 of the 33 lesions present in the left anterior descending artery (including diagonal branches with diameters >= 2 mm), seven of nine lesions present in the left circumflex artery (including marginal branches with diameters of >= 2 mm), and all 13 lesions present in the right coronary artery were correctly detected. Four of five false-negative findings of stenosis were located in diagonal or marginal branches. The mean reference diameter of these vessel segments was 2.5 ± 0.5 mm. One false-negative finding of stenosis was in the left circumflex artery, and, retrospectively, this error was found to be caused by calcifications.



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 56-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Heart rate was 65 beats/min. Multiplanar multidetector (MDCT) reconstruction shows right coronary artery (RCA) and left main artery and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) with proximal high-grade stenosis (arrow).

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 56-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Heart rate was 65 beats/min. Invasive coronary angiogram confirms MDCT finding and shows high-grade stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (arrows).

 


View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A. 48-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Heart rate was 61 beats/min. Multiplanar multidetector (MDCT) reconstruction shows right coronary artery with severe stenosis (arrow).

 


View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B. 48-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Heart rate was 61 beats/min. Invasive coronary angiogram confirms MDCT finding and shows severe stenosis of right coronary artery (arrow).

 

A total of 223 of the 229 assessable coronary arteries with no occlusion or stenosis were correctly judged to be free of obstruction. In 26 vessels, a high-grade lesion was incorrectly judged to be present on MDCT. The mean (± SD) diameter reduction of these false-positive lesions was 31% (± 22%). In seven vessels, a stenosis of intermediate degree (diameter reduction of between 50% and 70%) was present. If only assessable coronary arteries were considered, MDCT had a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 89%, positive predictive value of 66%, and negative predictive value of 98% for detection of high-grade stenoses and occlusions.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our study expands on findings of prior reports [9, 10, 12] that indicated ECG-gated MDCT was highly accurate for the detection of coronary artery stenoses if the image quality was sufficient. In our large group (100 patients), we found a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 89% in assessable vessel segments. However, only 71% of the coronary arteries could be evaluated, and in only 39% of the patients were all coronary arteries judged to be assessable. The high number of unassessable coronary arteries was mostly due to motion artifacts. As expected, the right coronary artery was most severely affected by motion on MDCT, because this vessel displays the fastest velocity during the cardiac cycle [19,20,21,22].

We observed the strong influence that a patient's heart rate during scanning had on image quality and accuracy for stenosis identification on MDCT. Even though we selected the optimal reconstruction window for every individual coronary artery, motion artifacts could not be prevented in imaging of 84 (21%) of the 400 coronary arteries, and motion artifacts were significantly more frequent in patients with heart rates of more than 70 beats/min than in patients with lower heart rates (<= 70 beats/min). Consequently, overall stenosis detection was more accurate in patients with low heart rates. A higher heart rate leads to a shorter R wave—to—R wave interval because of the shorter end diastolic portion of the cardiac cycle. This portion of the cardiac cycle is crucial to image acquisition at current temporal resolution of 250 msec.

In an earlier study, the best image quality was found in patients with heart rates of less than 74.5 beats/min [11]. The researchers used a 5-point scale to assess the image quality in each coronary segment. However, their study was limited to the analysis of image quality and did not investigate the detection of coronary artery stenoses.

Optimal positioning of the image reconstruction window seems to be crucial to achieving optimal image quality. It is known that each of the coronary arteries has a different motion pattern during the cardiac cycle [19, 20, 22]. Our findings confirm the results of a recently published study [15]. Images of the right coronary artery were most frequently of sufficient quality earlier in the cardiac cycle than were those of the left anterior descending and left circumflex arteries. In addition, a patient's heart rate during MDCT scanning had a strong influence on which cardiac phase provided the clearest visualization of the coronary arteries. Although in patients with lower heart rates (<= 70 beats/min) the optimal window position was usually found during mid to late diastole, the best image quality in patients with a heart rate of more than 70 beats/min was found during late systole and early diastole. The large variation in the optimal position of the image reconstruction window and the differences between the coronary arteries suggest that careful positioning and selection of the image reconstruction window are crucial factors to obtaining optimal image quality and diagnostic accuracy on MDCT.

In contrast to coronary angiography performed with electron-beam CT, MDCT does not require a longer scanning duration for patients with lower heart rates. Therefore, a useful approach might be to limit the use of MDCT for coronary artery visualization to patients with lower heart rates or to use pharmacologic interventions (e.g., ß-blockers) during the scanning to enhance image quality and accuracy in the identification of coronary stenoses. In addition, technical developments, such as a decreased gantry rotation time and the simultaneous acquisition of more than four parallel slices may further improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

We conclude that contrast-enhanced MDCT with retrospectively ECG-gated image reconstruction is a promising tool in detecting coronary artery stenoses. However, many coronary arteries are currently nonassessable because of motion artifacts, and the accuracy of stenosis detection decreases as a patient's heart rate increases.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 2000;102:2823 -2828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kopp AF, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, et al. Cardiac multidetector-row CT: first clinical results of retrospectively ECG-gated spiral with optimized temporal and spatial resolution [in German]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2000;172:429 -435[Medline]
  3. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 2000;217:564 -571[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mochizuki T, Murase K, Koyama Y, Higashino H, Ikezoe J. Images in cardiovascular medicine: LAD stenosis detected by subsecond spiral CT. Circulation 1999;99:1523[Free Full Text]
  5. Knez A, Becker C, Ohnesorge B, Haberl R, Reiser M, Steinbeck G. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis by multislice helical computed tomography. Circulation 2000;101:221 -222[Free Full Text]
  6. Becker CR, Knez A, Ohnesorge B, Schoepf UJ, Reiser MF. Imaging of noncalcified coronary plaques using helical CT with retrospective ECG gating. AJR 2000;175:423 -424[Free Full Text]
  7. Knez A, Leber A, Becker CR, Becker A, Reiser MF, Haberl R. Multirow-detector helical computed tomography for noninvasive angiography: a new imaging modality for determination of severe coronary artery disease. (abstr) Circulation 2000;102[suppl II]:411[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kopp A, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Ohnesorge B, Georg C, Claussen CD. Multidetector-row CT for noninvasive coronary angiography: results in 102 patients. (abstr) Radiology 2000;217(P):375
  9. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001;103:2535 -2538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ, van Ooijen P, van Geuns RJ, de Feyter PJ. Coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. Lancet 2001;357:599 -603[Medline]
  11. Hong C, Becker CR, Huber A, et al. ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. Radiology 2001;220:712 -717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Knez A, Becker CR, Leber A, et al. Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1191 -1194[Medline]
  13. Kachelriess M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA. ECG-correlated image reconstruction from sub-second multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart. Med Phys 2000;27:1881 -1902[Medline]
  14. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, et al. Cardiac imaging with rapid, retrospectively ECG synchronized multilevel spiral CT [in German]. Radiologe 2000;40:111 -117[Medline]
  15. Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, et al. Coronary arteries: retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography with selective optimization of the image reconstruction window. Radiology 2001;221:683 -688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Reddy G, Chernoff DM, Adams JR, et al. Coronary artery stenoses: assessment with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and axial reconstructions. Radiology 1998;208:167 -172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, Kooyman CJ, et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantification of coronary cine-angiograms. Circulation 1985;71:280 -288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Haase J, Di Mario C, Slager CJ, et al. In vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantom in porcine coronary arteries. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;27:16 -27[Medline]
  19. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Holle J, Muschiol G, Daniel WG, Moshage W. In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. Radiology 2000;216:457 -463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Paulin S. Coronary angiography: a technical, anatomic and clinical study. Acta Radiol 1964;233[suppl]:1 -215
  21. Hofman MB, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH. Quantification of in-plane motion of the coronary arteries during the cardiac cycle: implications for acquisition window duration for MR flow quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:568 -576[Medline]
  22. Wang Y, Vidan E, Bergman GW. Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 1999;213:751 -758[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Pasricha, D. Nandurkar, S. K. Seneviratne, J. D. Cameron, M. Crossett, M. E. Schneider-Kolsky, and J. M. Troupis
Image Quality of Coronary 320-MDCT in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Initial Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2009; 193(6): 1514 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Yang, Z. Zhang, Z. Fan, C. Xu, L. Zhao, W. Yu, and Z. Yan
64-MDCT Coronary Angiography of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Efficacy in Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): 795 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. M. S. Joemai, J. Geleijns, W. J. H. Veldkamp, A. de Roos, and L. J. M. Kroft
Automated Cardiac Phase Selection with 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1690 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. A. Bluemke, S. Achenbach, M. Budoff, T. C. Gerber, B. Gersh, L. D. Hillis, W. G. Hundley, W. J. Manning, B. F. Printz, M. Stuber, et al.
Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 586 - 606.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
S. Prat-Gonzalez, J. Sanz, and M. J. Garcia
Cardiac CT: Indications and Limitations
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., March 1, 2008; 36(1): 18 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
U. Ropers, D. Ropers, T. Pflederer, K. Anders, A. Kuettner, N. I. Stilianakis, S. Komatsu, W. Kalender, W. Bautz, W. G. Daniel, et al.
Influence of Heart Rate on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Source Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2007; 50(25): 2393 - 2398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. Abdulla, S. Z. Abildstrom, O. Gotzsche, E. Christensen, L. Kober, and C. Torp-Pedersen
64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2007; 28(24): 3042 - 3050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Colletti
Coronary CT Angiography Without {beta}-Blockers
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1324 - 1325.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. J. M. Kroft, A. de Roos, and J. Geleijns
Artifacts in ECG-Synchronized MDCT Coronary Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 581 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. R. Bogot, R. Durst, D. Shaham, and D. Admon
Cardiac CT of the Transplanted Heart: Indications, Technique, Appearance, and Complications
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2007; 27(5): 1297 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. K. Vanhoenacker, M. H. Heijenbrok-Kal, R. Van Heste, I. Decramer, L. R. Van Hoe, W. Wijns, and M. G. M. Hunink
Diagnostic Performance of Multidetector CT Angiography for Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: Meta-analysis
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 419 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. J. Schoepf, P. L. Zwerner, G. Savino, C. Herzog, J. M. Kerl, and P. Costello
Coronary CT Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 48 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. R. C. Johnson, K. Nikolaou, B. J. Wintersperger, A. Knez, P. Boekstegers, M. F. Reiser, and C. R. Becker
ECG-Gated 64-MDCT Angiography in the Differential Diagnosis of Acute Chest Pain
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 76 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Achenbach
Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1919 - 1928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Leschka, S. Wildermuth, T. Boehm, L. Desbiolles, L. Husmann, A. Plass, P. Koepfli, T. Schepis, B. Marincek, P. A. Kaufmann, et al.
Noninvasive Coronary Angiography with 64-Section CT: Effect of Average Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability on Image Quality
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 378 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, R. S. Blumenthal, J. J. Carr, J. G. Goldin, P. Greenland, A. D. Guerci, J. A.C. Lima, D. J. Rader, G. D. Rubin, et al.
Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology
Circulation, October 17, 2006; 114(16): 1761 - 1791.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. M. Jones, T. Athanasiou, N. Dunne, J. Kirby, S. Attaran, A. Chow, S. Purkayastha, and A. Darzi
Multi-slice computed tomography in coronary artery disease.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 30(3): 443 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Sigurdsson, P. Carrascosa, M. H. Yamani, N. L. Greenberg, S. Perrone, G. Lev, M. Y. Desai, and M. J. Garcia
Detection of Transplant Coronary Artery Disease Using Multidetector Computed Tomography With Adaptative Multisegment Reconstruction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 772 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. K. Pannu, J. E. Jacobs, S. Lai, and E. K. Fishman
Coronary CT angiography with 64-MDCT: assessment of vessel visibility.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 119 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
U. Hoffmann, A. J. Pena, R. C. Cury, S. Abbara, M. Ferencik, F. Moselewski, U. Siebert, T. J. Brady, and J. T. Nagurney
Cardiac CT in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Chest Pain.
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 963 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Colletti
Cardiac Imaging 2006
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S337 - S340.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. K. Pannu, W. Alvarez Jr., and E. K. Fishman
{beta}-Blockers for Cardiac CT: A Primer for the Radiologist
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S341 - S345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
U. Hoffmann, M. Ferencik, R. C. Cury, and A. J. Pena
Coronary CT Angiography
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 797 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Peebles
Computed tomographic coronary angiography: how many slices do you need?
Heart, May 1, 2006; 92(5): 582 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. A.S. Cordeiro and J. A.C. Lima
Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by multidetector row computed tomography angiography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8 Suppl): C40 - C47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G. Pache, U. Saueressig, A. Frydrychowicz, D. Foell, N. Ghanem, E. Kotter, A. Geibel-Zehender, C. Bode, M. Langer, and T. Bley
Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 976 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Detection of coronary complications after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries: first experience with multislice computed tomography in children.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2006; 131(3): 639 - 643.



Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Herzog, M. Arning-Erb, S. Zangos, K. Eichler, R. Hammerstingl, S. Dogan, H. Ackermann, and T. J. Vogl
Multi-Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography: Influence of Reconstruction Technique and Heart Rate on Image Quality
Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 75 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. J. W. Sandstede, J. Stoffels, F. Wendel, C. Ritter, M. Beer, and D. Hahn
Different Reconstruction Intervals for Exclusion of Coronary Artery Calcifications by Retrospectively Gated MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 193 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
N E Manghat, G J Morgan-Hughes, A J Marshall, and C A Roobottom
Multidetector row computed tomography: imaging congenital coronary artery anomalies in adults
Heart, December 1, 2005; 91(12): 1515 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Muhlenbruch, R. Koos, J. E. Wildberger, R. W. Gunther, and A. H. Mahnken
Imaging of the Cardiac Venous System: Comparison of MDCT and Conventional Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1252 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Kaiser, J. Bremerich, S. Haller, H. P. Brunner-La Rocca, G. Bongartz, M. Pfisterer, and P. Buser
Limited diagnostic yield of non-invasive coronary angiography by 16-slice multi-detector spiral computed tomography in routine patients referred for evaluation of coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 1987 - 1992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. H. Kim, J. Hur, S. J. Kim, H. S. Kim, B. W. Choi, K. O. Choe, Y. W. Yoon, and H. M. Kwon
Two-Phase Reconstruction for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Volume and Function Using Retrospective ECG-Gated MDCT: Comparison with Echocardiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 319 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
E. K. Fishman
Multidetector-row computed tomography to detect coronary artery disease: the importance of heart rate
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., August 1, 2005; 7(suppl_G): G4 - G12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Achenbach and W. G. Daniel
Computed Tomography of the Coronary Arteries: More Than Meets the (Angiographic) Eye
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 155 - 157.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. H. K. Hoffmann, H. Shi, B. L. Schmitz, F. T. Schmid, M. Lieberknecht, R. Schulze, B. Ludwig, U. Kroschel, N. Jahnke, W. Haerer, et al.
Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography
JAMA, May 25, 2005; 293(20): 2471 - 2478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. P. Lawler, H. K. Pannu, and E. K. Fishman
MDCT Evaluation of the Coronary Arteries, 2004: How We Do It--Data Acquisition, Postprocessing, Display, and Interpretation
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1402 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Heuschmid, A. Kuettner, S. Schroeder, T. Trabold, A. Feyer, M. D. Seemann, R. Kuzo, C. D. Claussen, and A. F. Kopp
ECG-Gated 16-MDCT of the Coronary Arteries: Assessment of Image Quality and Accuracy in Detecting Stenoses
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1413 - 1419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Aviram, R. Sharony, A. Kramer, N. Nesher, D. Loberman, Y. Ben-Gal, M. Graif, G. Uretzky, and R. Mohr
Modification of Surgical Planning Based on Cardiac Multidetector Computed Tomography in Reoperative Heart Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 589 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Shim, Y. Kim, and S. M. Lim
Improvement of Image Quality with {beta}-Blocker Premedication on ECG-Gated 16-MDCT Coronary Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 649 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. K. Hofmann, K. H. Zou, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Electrocardiographically Gated 16-Section CT of the Thorax: Cardiac Motion Suppression
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 927 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Lu, N. Zhuang, S.-S. Mao, J. Child, S. Carson, and M. J. Budoff
Baseline Heart Rate-adjusted Electrocardiographic Triggering for Coronary Artery Electron-Beam CT Angiography
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 590 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Schlosser, T. Konorza, P. Hunold, H. Kuhl, A. Schmermund, and J.o. Barkhausen
Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 15, 2004; 44(6): 1224 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Kuettner, T. Trabold, S. Schroeder, A. Feyer, T. Beck, A. Brueckner, M. Heuschmid, C. Burgstahler, A. F. Kopp, and C. D. Claussen
Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: Initial clinical results
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 15, 2004; 44(6): 1230 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. K. Willmann, D. Weishaupt, R. Kobza, F. R. Verdun, B. Seifert, B. Marincek, and T. Boehm
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts: ECG-gated Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography--Influence of Image Reconstruction Interval on Graft Visibility
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 568 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. J. Schoepf, C. R. Becker, B. M. Ohnesorge, and E. K. Yucel
CT of Coronary Artery Disease
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 18 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. Hoffmann, R. Millea, C. Enzweiler, M. Ferencik, S. Gulick, J. Titus, S. Achenbach, D. Kwait, D. Sosnovik, and T. J. Brady
Acute Myocardial Infarction: Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in a Porcine Model
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 697 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. S. Choi, B. W. Choi, K. O. Choe, D. Choi, K.-J. Yoo, M.-I. Kim, and J. Kim
Pitfalls, Artifacts, and Remedies in Multi- Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2004; 24(3): 787 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Kuettner, A. F. Kopp, S. Schroeder, T. Rieger, J. Brunn, C. Meisner, M. Heuschmid, T. Trabold, C. Burgstahler, J. Martensen, et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 831 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, and A. Duerinckx
Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 3, 2003; 42(11): 1867 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Gurevitch, T. Gaspar, B. Orlov, R. Amar, D. Dvir, N. Peled, and D. J. Aravot
Noninvasive evaluation of arterial grafts with newly released multidetector computed tomography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1523 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Naghavi, P. Libby, E. Falk, S. W. Casscells, S. Litovsky, J. Rumberger, J. J. Badimon, C. Stefanadis, P. Moreno, G. Pasterkamp, et al.
From Vulnerable Plaque to Vulnerable Patient: A Call for New Definitions and Risk Assessment Strategies: Part I
Circulation, October 7, 2003; 108(14): 1664 - 1672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. R. Van Hoe, K. G. De Meerleer, P. Ph. Leyman, and P. K. Vanhoenacker
Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using ECG-Gated Multidetector CT: Effect of Individually Optimized Image-Reconstruction Windows on Image Quality and Measurement Reproducibility
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 1093 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. K. Pannu, T. G. Flohr, F. M. Corl, and E. K. Fishman
Current Concepts in Multi-Detector Row CT Evaluation of the Coronary Arteries: Principles, Techniques, and Anatomy
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2003; 23(90001): S111 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
K.-J. Yoo, D. Choi, B. W. Choi, S.-H. Lim, and B.-C. Chang
The comparison of the graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting using coronary angiography and multi-slice computed tomography
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 24(1): 86 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C R Peebles
Non-invasive coronary imaging: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging?
Heart, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 591 - 594.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Ropers, U. Baum, K. Pohle, K. Anders, S. Ulzheimer, B. Ohnesorge, C. Schlundt, W. Bautz, W. G. Daniel, and S. Achenbach
Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Thin-Slice Multi-Detector Row Spiral Computed Tomography and Multiplanar Reconstruction
Circulation, February 11, 2003; 107(5): 664 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giesler, T.
Right arrow Articles by Achenbach, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giesler, T.
Right arrow Articles by Achenbach, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS