|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||
The following table or figure may be downloaded to PowerPoint for personal use in teaching and presentations. This feature is available to all subscribers to the journal. You MUST read and follow the guidelines at Request to Reproduce AJR Content if you are distributing or using AJR content beyond academic use (limited distribution, non-revenue producing, or educational purposes). (Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Fig. 2. Graph shows mean cumulative number of case decision outcomes
as function of time to decision for trainees for final-decision phase. As was
seen with mammographers, most true-positive responses ([UNK]) were made within
40 sec, but performance of trainees was approximately half that of
mammographers. False-positive responses on cases with abnormal findings
(
) and false-positive responses on cases with normal findings (
)
began to affect performance at 15 sec. At 35 sec, false-positive responses for
normal cases plus false-positive responses for abnormal cases started to
overtake true-positive responses, and performance continued to deteriorate as
decision time increased.
![]()
Return to article
Hotlight (NEW!) ![]()
![]()
What's Hotlight?
HOME
HELP
FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIPTIONS
ARCHIVE
SEARCH
TABLE OF CONTENTS