AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marchac, V.
Right arrow Articles by Brunelle, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marchac, V.
Right arrow Articles by Brunelle, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:1245-1252
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Thoracic CT in Pediatric Patients with Difficult-to-Treat Asthma

Valentine Marchac1, Sophie Emond2, Tania Mamou-Mani2, Christine Le Bihan-Benjamin3, Muriel le Bourgeois1, Jacques de Blic1, Pierre Scheinmann1 and Francis Brunelle2

1 Service de Pneumologie et d'Allergologie Pédiatriques, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France.
2 Service de Radiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 75015 Paris, France.
3 Service de Biostatistiques et Informatique Médicale, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 75015 Paris, France.

Received February 11, 2002; accepted after revision April 22, 2002.

 
Address correspondence to V. Marchac.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to establish objective, simple criteria for bronchial wall thickening in children with difficult-to-treat asthma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Bronchial sections were counted at five levels in both lungs and at three levels in the right lung on high-resolution CT and plotted against lung function. Findings from 27 children with persistent symptoms of asthma (mean age, 11.4 years; SD, ±3.1 years) that were severe (group A, n = 15) or moderate (group B, n = 12) were compared with findings from 21 control subjects (mean age, 10.8 years; SD, ±3.0 years) using the Student's t test, analysis of variance, and Dunn-Bonferroni test.

RESULTS. A bronchial wall thickening score based on the number of visible bronchi at three levels (three-level score) proved to be as valuable as and simpler to obtain than a score based on the number of bronchi at five levels (five-level score). The three-level scores for groups A and B were similar (mean ± SD, 16.8 ± 4.2 vs 18.4 ± 3.4, respectively; p = not significant), but these scores were significantly higher than those for the control subjects (mean ± SD, 8.2 ± 3.4, respectively; p < 0.001). There was no correlation between the three-level score and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec or forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity. In contrast with adults with severe asthma, our pediatric patients with difficult-to-treat asthma did not have CT evidence of mucoid impaction, emphysema, areas of hyperlucency, bronchiectasis, or sequellar line shadows.

CONCLUSION. Bronchial wall thickening visible on high-resolution CT may constitute an additional criterion of asthma severity in children. CT evidence of bronchial wall thickening might help to identify patients with a higher risk of airway remodeling.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
For many years, bronchospasm, edema, and hypersecretion were considered to be the major phenomena associated with asthma. Now there is evidence that bronchial inflammation occurs even in patients with mild asthma and that this inflammation increases with the severity of the disease [1].

Chronic inflammation of the airways is followed by healing that may lead to structural changes known as airway remodeling [2]. The remodeling process involves a thickening of the airway wall by fibrosis and an increase in smooth muscle and mucus gland mass [3]. Structural changes take place in both the large and small airways in fatal cases of asthma, but are mainly confined to the small airways in non-fatal cases [4]. Airway wall thickening has been observed on high-resolution CT (HRCT) scans in adults [5], along with other findings such as emphysema, bronchiectasis, and line shadows corresponding to sequelae.

The aim of this study was to describe HRCT findings and to establish an objective simple criterion for bronchial wall thickening in children with difficult-to-treat asthma. Children with this condition are likely to have bronchial inflammation and therefore to have a greater risk of remodeling. By analogy with findings in adults, the visualization of abnormalities on HRCT may be another objective criterion of bronchial inflammation useful for asthma management. HRCT findings were therefore compared with clinical status and lung function data for children with difficult-to-treat asthma.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
A prospective study was conducted at our asthma clinic from January 1996 to May 2000 that included patients with difficult-to-treat asthma. All patients met the criteria for asthma by the American Thoracic Society Standards [6] and had been treated for at least 6 months with high doses of inhaled steroids (>=800 mg/day beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide).

All patients had difficult-to-treat asthma and were not symptom-free despite undergoing treatment with high doses of antiasthma medication. Children were said to have difficult-to-treat asthma [7] if receiving 800 mg or more of beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide per day or more than 1 mg/kg body weight of prednisolone on alternate days; requiring use of bronchodilators 3 days every week, in addition to any long-acting ß-agonists, for wheezing with related proven poor spirometry on home recording; having less than 80% forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1); and requiring additional steroids every month to reverse a proven episode or absence from school for more than 5 days per term because of asthma.

Patients were classified into the following two groups according to the severity and frequency of their symptoms. Group A consisted of children with persistent symptoms that were moderate: cough on exertion or infrequent nocturnal cough. Group B was composed of children with persistent symptoms that were severe: symptoms that required additional ß-agonists more than three times a week, at least one asthma attack requiring hospital treatment, frequent nocturnal cough, peak flow variation of more than 20% during the day, or persistent asthma attacks.

Group C was the control group, consisting of pediatric patients (>6 years old) with normal findings on thoracic CT. Exclusion criteria included a history of wheezing, chronic coughing, or recent bronchitis. HRCT was performed to assess mediastinal lymphadenopathy suspected on the basis of positive results for Mantoux's test on chest radiography [8, 9], to investigate pneumothorax, or to look for evidence of interstitial pulmonary disease suspected from chest radiography of patients with a systemic disease without respiratory involvement (e.g., disseminated lupus erythematosus, vasculitis, scleroderma). One patient was examined on HRCT for isolated intrapulmonary calcification.

For all the patients with asthma, HRCT of the thorax was performed to exclude differential diagnoses, essentially viral sequelae (i.e., bronchiolitis obliterans or bronchiectasis), and lung function tests were performed to assess disease severity. Informed consent was given by parents. Lung CT scans were obtained during a stable period (i.e., no exacerbation of asthma symptoms during the month before scanning), and function tests were performed at approximately the same time as CT (±1 week) with no exacerbation between CT and function testing.

Exclusion criteria were a history of chronic lung disease such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cystic fibrosis, or other definite systemic disease; the presence of stridor; suspected inhalation of a foreign body; immunoglobulin deficiency; and age of 6 years or less.

The characteristics of the patients that were recorded included age at the time of the study, age at the onset of symptoms, sex, duration of the disease, high level of total IgE, or positive IgE levels specific for at least one respiratory allergen, and current asthma medication. In addition, we recorded personal atopic status for each patient by indicating whether patients had a history of eczema or positive findings on skin prick tests specific for at least one inhaled allergen as previously described [10].

Imaging
All patients underwent HRCT of the chest on a helical scanner (ProSpeed; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). HRCT scans were obtained during full inspiration in all patients and subjects except in those too young to hold their breath. The following parameters were used: 1-mm sections at 10-mm intervals, bone E3 enhanced algorithm, 512 x 512 matrix, 140 kVp, and 130 mAs. The scanning time was 1.0 sec, and scanning was performed from the apices of the lungs to the lung bases. Lung window settings were photographed at a width of 1600 H and a level of -600 H. CT scans were interpreted by two pediatric radiologists who were unaware of the clinical history of the patients and control subjects.

Bronchial wall thickening was assessed as follows. All visible sections of bronchi were counted at five levels in the pulmonary fields (right and left lungs). All circular (complete circles or at least two thirds of a circle) and longitudinal bronchi except hilar bronchi were included. The five levels were 1 cm above the carina, 1 cm below the carina, the right pulmonary vein, 2.5-3 cm below the top of the pulmonary vein, and above the right side of the diaphragm. The number of visible sections of bronchi at these five levels were added to yield a score (five-level score) for bronchial wall thickening.

A simplified method of examining only the right lung at the following three levels was also used: 1 cm below the carina, 2.5-3 cm below the top of the right pulmonary vein, and above the right side of the diaphragm. The right lung was chosen so that the effects of cardiac motions of the left side could be avoided. The number of visible sections of bronchi at these three levels were added to yield a score (three-level score) for bronchial wall thickening.

In 20 patients, four sections were acquired from the base during expiration to investigate areas of air trapping. In addition, we looked for other abnormalities described in adult patients with asthma [11, 12]: mucoid impaction, collapse, emphysema, bronchiectasis, air-space consolidation, and line shadows corresponding to sequelae. We defined these line shadows as linear densities 2-5 cm long extending through the lung and in some cases coming into contact with the pleura [12,13,14].

Pulmonary Function Tests
Spirometric tests were performed in the respiratory and physiology laboratory as previously described [15]. We analyzed FEV1 and the mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (i.e., during the middle half) of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75). FEV1 is used to evaluate the large airways, whereas FEF25-75 reflects the small airways.

Statistical Analysis
The agreement between the two observers for the number of visible bronchial sections was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient.

The means for groups A and B were compared with the mean for group C using the Student's t test.

Differences between groups and subgroups were assessed by factorial analysis of variance. The Dunn-Bonferroni test was used to determine correlations among asthma severity, lung function (FEV1 and FEF25-75), and bronchial wall thickening scores on HRCT.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
Between January 1996 and May 2000, 30 patients with persistent symptoms of asthma that were difficult to manage were included in the study. Three patients were excluded because of changes in diagnosis (viral sequelae, humoral immune deficiency). The remaining 27 patients underwent HRCT and lung function tests and were included in the study: group A, 15 patients with moderate symptoms; group B, 12 patients with severe symptoms. We also included 21 control subjects (group C). The characteristics of the patients and control subjects are presented in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Characteristics, Lung Function, and Medication for Patients with Asthma and Control Subjects

 

Groups A and B did not differ in mean age at the onset of symptoms, age at HRCT, duration of the disease, or personal atopic status. Moreover, the groups did not differ in treatment received, including the level of inhaled steroids, or in the duration of treatment before HRCT. All patients received long-term (>=6 months) inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, with 24 (88.9%) of the 27 patients receiving 800 mg/day or more. In addition, 19 (70.3%) of the 27 patients also received long-acting ß2-agonists.

Imaging
The bronchial wall thickening scores based on the number of bronchi counted on HRCT scans are shown in Table 2. In group A, the five-level score was 52.5 ± 11.0, and the three-level score was 16.8 ± 4.2. In group B, the five-level score was 58.0 ± 10.3, and the three-level score was 18.4 ± 3.4. The five-level score (mean ± SD) for bronchial wall thickening in the control subjects was 29.8 ± 9.2, and the three-level score was 8.2 ± 3.4.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Bronchial Wall Thickening Scores Based on Number of Bronchi Visible at Three Versus Five Levels on HRCT

 

The difference between patients (groups A and B combined) and the control subjects (group C) was highly significant (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between groups A and B (Figs. 1 and 2). The three-level scores for bronchial wall thickening proved to be as valuable as the five-level scores.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Scatterplot shows bronchial wall thickening scores for pediatric patients with asthma in group A (moderate persistent symptoms, n = 15), group B (severe persistent symptoms, n = 12), and group C (control subjects, n = 21). Scores were based on number of bronchial sections visible at five levels in both lungs on high-resolution CT (HRCT). Horizontal lines = medians.

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Scatterplot shows bronchial wall thickening scores for pediatric patients with persistent symptoms of asthma in group A (moderate persistent symptoms, n = 15), group B (severe persistent symptoms, n = 12), and group C (control subjects, n = 21). Scores were based on number of bronchial sections visible at three levels in right lung on high-resolution CT (HRCT). Horizontal lines = medians.

 

We found no correlation between treatment (inhaled steroids >=6 months with or without long-acting ß2-agonists), age at the time of the scanning, duration of the disease, and scores for bronchial wall thickening on HRCT.

For each of the five levels studied on HRCT, a statistically significant difference between the number of bronchial sections seen in patients with asthma (groups A and B) and control subjects (group C) (data not shown) was found. This finding is consistent with the fact that asthma is a diffuse disease of the bronchial tree. The three low sections used for the three-level score were chosen to generate a simplified version of the five-level score for bronchial wall thickening. Similar scores were obtained regardless of which sections were used to yield a score for bronchial wall thickening (data not shown).

Agreement between the two observers was good. The interclass correlation coefficient was 0.997 for the five-level score and was 0.995 for the three-level score.

Figures 3A,3B,3C,3D,3E,3F and 4A,4B,4C,4D,4E,4F show the HRCT scans that were obtained at three predetermined levels (1 cm below the carina, 2.5-3 cm below the top of the right pulmonary vein, and above the right diaphragm) to yield a score for bronchial wall thickening. The visible bronchi, all of which are circular (complete circles or at least two thirds of a circle), and longitudinal bronchi with the exception of the hilar bronchi are shown in schematic diagrams to the right of each HRCT scan.



View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 15-year-old girl without asthma (group C). Subject underwent high-resolution CT (HRCT) for investigation of pneumothorax. HRCT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). One section of bronchial wall thickening was detected at first level (A), six sections were seen at second level (C), and one section was depicted at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 8 (1 + 6 + 1 = 8).

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 15-year-old girl without asthma (group C). Subject underwent high-resolution CT (HRCT) for investigation of pneumothorax. HRCT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). One section of bronchial wall thickening was detected at first level (A), six sections were seen at second level (C), and one section was depicted at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 8 (1 + 6 + 1 = 8).

 


View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. 15-year-old girl without asthma (group C). Subject underwent high-resolution CT (HRCT) for investigation of pneumothorax. HRCT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). One section of bronchial wall thickening was detected at first level (A), six sections were seen at second level (C), and one section was depicted at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 8 (1 + 6 + 1 = 8).

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D. 15-year-old girl without asthma (group C). Subject underwent high-resolution CT (HRCT) for investigation of pneumothorax. HRCT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). One section of bronchial wall thickening was detected at first level (A), six sections were seen at second level (C), and one section was depicted at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 8 (1 + 6 + 1 = 8).

 


View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3E. 15-year-old girl without asthma (group C). Subject underwent high-resolution CT (HRCT) for investigation of pneumothorax. HRCT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). One section of bronchial wall thickening was detected at first level (A), six sections were seen at second level (C), and one section was depicted at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 8 (1 + 6 + 1 = 8).

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3F. 15-year-old girl without asthma (group C). Subject underwent high-resolution CT (HRCT) for investigation of pneumothorax. HRCT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). One section of bronchial wall thickening was detected at first level (A), six sections were seen at second level (C), and one section was depicted at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 8 (1 + 6 + 1 = 8).

 


View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 11-year-old boy with severe, persistent symptoms of asthma (group B). High-resolution CT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). Six sections of bronchial wall thickening were detected at first level (A); eight sections, at second level (C); and four sections, at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 18 (6 + 8 + 4 = 18).

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 11-year-old boy with severe, persistent symptoms of asthma (group B). High-resolution CT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). Six sections of bronchial wall thickening were detected at first level (A); eight sections, at second level (C); and four sections, at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 18 (6 + 8 + 4 = 18).

 


View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. 11-year-old boy with severe, persistent symptoms of asthma (group B). High-resolution CT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). Six sections of bronchial wall thickening were detected at first level (A); eight sections, at second level (C); and four sections, at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 18 (6 + 8 + 4 = 18).

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D. 11-year-old boy with severe, persistent symptoms of asthma (group B). High-resolution CT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). Six sections of bronchial wall thickening were detected at first level (A); eight sections, at second level (C); and four sections, at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 18 (6 + 8 + 4 = 18).

 


View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4E. 11-year-old boy with severe, persistent symptoms of asthma (group B). High-resolution CT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). Six sections of bronchial wall thickening were detected at first level (A); eight sections, at second level (C); and four sections, at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 18 (6 + 8 + 4 = 18).

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4F. 11-year-old boy with severe, persistent symptoms of asthma (group B). High-resolution CT scans obtained at three predefined levels and corresponding schematic diagrams show sections of bronchi (arrow, B). Six sections of bronchial wall thickening were detected at first level (A); eight sections, at second level (C); and four sections, at third level (E). Therefore, bronchial wall thickening score for this patient was 18 (6 + 8 + 4 = 18).

 

Figure 3A,3B,3C,3D,3E,3F shows the HRCT scans of a 15-year-old female control subject. The three-level score for bronchial wall thickening was calculated by counting all the redrawn bronchi shown on the HRCT scans obtained at the three predefined levels. Therefore, the three-level score for bronchial wall thickening was 8 (1 + 6 + 1). Figure 4A,4B,4C,4D,4E,4F shows the HRCT scans of an 11-year-old boy with severe, persistent symptoms (group B). The three-level score for bronchial wall thickening in this patient was 18 (6 + 8 + 4).

Table 2 provides the FEV1, FEF25-75, and HRCT scores. There was no significant difference in FEV1 between groups A and B. The difference in FEF25-75 between groups A and B (wide SDs) was not significant, but FEF25-75 tended to be lower in group B.

No correlation could be found between HRCT scores (five-level score and three-level score) and results of lung function tests (FEV1 or FEF25-75).

Additional HRCT Findings
We found no mucoid impaction, emphysema, areas of hyperlucency, bronchiectasis, or line shadows corresponding to sequelae on HRCT scans obtained at five predefined levels.

In some patients, septal lines were seen on HRCT. This finding was defined as thin (1-2 mm) linear opacities that were less than 1 cm long and not parallel to the inner chest wall. None of the septal lines were attached to the pleura (one septal line, n = 8; two septal lines, n = 3; more than two septal lines, n = 10) or localized mild air-space consolidation (n = 5; always in the right middle lobe). We observed no air trapping on inspiratory sections. In contrast, air trapping was found in 11 of 20 expiratory sections and was diffuse in eight of these 11 sections. Air trapping was not related to the severity of the symptoms (groups A and B) or to lung function (FEV1 and FEF25-75).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our results show that children with difficult-to-treat asthma with persistent symptoms despite treatment (groups A and B) had more bronchi visible on HRCT than the control subjects (group C). Surprisingly, no correlation could be found between the bronchial wall thickening scores based on HRCT and the results of lung function tests.

We selected pediatric patients with difficult-to-treat asthma according to the definition of McKenzie [7]. The selected patients required high levels of medication and had persistent symptoms, asthma exacerbations, or airflow obstruction despite taking high doses of anti-asthma medication (groups A and B). This population of patients with asthma is the most difficult to treat, as reported at the American Thoracic Society workshop [10], and probably corresponds to the patients at most risk of developing remodeling sequelae. Patients with mild asthma were not included for ethical reasons.

There is currently no reference method defining bronchial wall thickness for use in adults. Bronchial wall thickness is currently diagnosed on the basis of high visibility of the bronchi in the external third of the pulmonary field on HRCT. This method is highly subjective, and its reproducibility has, to our knowledge, not been studied. In studies using this subjective analysis [12, 16, 17], bronchial wall thickening has been reported in adults with mild to severe asthma with a prevalence of from 30% [12] to 92% [16].

Attempts have been made to analyze bronchial wall thickening quantitatively [18,19,20,21]. Boulet et al. [18] measured the thickness of the intermediate bronchus with an electronic caliper and calculated the ratio of wall thickness to outer diameter. Okazawa et al. [21] measured (in excised dog lungs) the airway wall area and airway wall percentage, which was defined as [(airway wall area / total area) x 100]. Awadh et al. [19] and Niimi et al. [20] applied a slightly modified version of this technique to adults with asthma.

These methods have some limitations. Boulet et al. [18] presented results for only a proximal bronchus (the right intermediate bronchus). Because asthma also affects small airways, this technique may underestimate the extent of peripheral bronchial wall thickening. Awadh et al. [19] and Niimi et al. [20] restricted their analyses to airways for which cross sections were obtained on the basis of the apparent roundness of the airway lumen. This method may lead to significant errors because the magnitude depends on the acuteness of airway angles. This method also requires image amplification.

No data are available concerning the normal thickness of bronchi in children, and direct measurements of the bronchial wall are difficult and subject to error. We therefore established a semiquantitative criterion that was based on known physical spatial resolution data. Spatial resolution is a physically known parameter for a given CT scan and reveals the size of the smallest structure that is visible on the CT scan. By definition, any structure smaller than the spatial resolution will not be visible, whereas all structures larger than the spatial resolution will be visible. This definition is well accepted for interstitial lung disease, in which the thickened structures become visible [5].

Because the spatial resolution of the CT scanner remained constant, we assumed that any increase in the thickness of the bronchial wall would be associated with an increase in the number of visible bronchi. We therefore counted the visible bronchi in the pulmonary parenchyma at three predefined levels and at five predefined levels to generate a three-level score and five-level score for bronchial wall thickening, respectively.

This method yielded consistent radiologic findings and is reliable and reproducible. The three-level score for bronchial wall thickening proved to be as valuable as the five-level score for bronchial wall thickening, but the three-level score is simpler to obtain because visible sections of bronchi are counted at only three levels on the right lung as opposed to five levels on both lungs. We therefore recommend that the three-level score be used for bronchial wall thickening. Because each new machine is likely to have higher definition than previous machines, it is important to reestablish normality criteria for each new type of scan.

Our results show that patients with difficult-to-treat asthma who are symptomatic, with severe (group B) or moderate symptoms (group A), had significantly higher bronchial wall thickening scores on HRCT than control subjects (group C). There was no significant difference in the bronchial wall thickening scores on HRCT scans between children with moderate symptoms (group A) and those with more severe symptoms or attacks (group B).

Studies involving quantitative analysis of HRCT scans in adults [17, 19] have shown that all groups of patients with mild to severe asthma, defined according to clinical [19] or functional [17] criteria, have airway walls that are thicker than those of healthy subjects and that subjects with more severe asthma display a greater amount of airway wall thickening than those with milder asthma. Our results are consistent with these findings and show that bronchial wall thickening occurs in children with persistent asthma.

The use of HRCT for the assessment of bronchial wall involvement in pediatric patients with asthma is associated with potential risks. Recently, a group of researchers suggested that the dose of radiation used should be reduced when examining children [22]. We currently use the recommended setting for CT in children (i.e., 80 mA, 140 kVp, 1-sec acquisition). The settings described in this article correspond to the CT protocol proviously used at our institution.

Bronchial wall thickening that is visible on HRCT may result from edema and transient inflammatory infiltration, an increase in the mass of airway smooth muscle, extracellular matrix, and elastic and collagenous tissues. Bronchial wall thickening visible on HRCT may reflect reversible or irreversible inflammation. Our results suggest that inflammation persists in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma who have persistent symptoms, even in patients with moderate symptoms, and that these individuals may therefore have a higher risk of remodeling and sequelae.

One of the fundamental criteria for the noninvasive surveillance and adaptation of asthma treatment is respiratory function. Our results show that this criterion may underestimate bronchial inflammation. No correlation was observed between HRCT scores and FEV1, which reflects proximal obstruction, or between HRCT scores and FEF25-75, which reflects the obstruction of small airways. We conclude from our analysis that respiratory function (volume and flow) may not reflect all pathologic aspects of asthma and may be an insufficient surveillance criterion.

This conclusion is consistent with findings from a study showing that reducing airway hyperresponsiveness by inhaled steroid treatment leads to more effective control of asthma and alleviation of chronic airways inflammation than the usual practice of adjusting treatment according to lung function and symptoms [23].

Studies measuring an objective criterion of bronchial wall thickening and determining measures reflecting proximal obstruction (FEV1) have shown that bronchial wall thickening occurs in patients with asthma who have a normal FEV1 value [18,19,20]. No study has yet, to our knowledge, compared an objective criterion of bronchial wall thickening and measures reflecting distal obstruction (FEF25-75). We found no individual correlation between bronchial wall thickening scores and distal functions (which were generally lower in the patients than the subjects). In patients with asthma, the large airways are almost always involved to some extent, so determining whether there is any narrowing of the small airways on the basis of tests of forced expiration is difficult [24]. Although patients with asthma present with significantly lower FEF25-75 values (reflecting peripheral airway function) than control subjects, this measure is not specific [25]. Lung attenuation curve measures have been shown to be more sensitive than traditional spirometry for the detection of peripheral airway dysfunction [26], but this technique requires serial HRCT before and after metacholine administration, which would not be ethical in pediatric patients. This constraint shows the value of searching for other objective criteria by which to assess the severity of asthma.

The use of an HRCT score for bronchial wall thickening should be evaluated as another criterion for disease evaluation, particularly in cases in which the severity of the symptoms and the findings on lung function tests are discordant. Discrepancies such as this one may be caused by differences in the information provided on HRCT and on lung function tests.

Unlike the results obtained in adults with asthma [27] and in a Turkish study of pediatric patients [28] and despite the fact that we studied a population of children with severe asthma, we found no mucoid impaction, emphysema, areas of hyperlucency, bronchiectasis, or line shadows corresponding to sequelae. These abnormalities have been correlated with disease severity in adults [12], and some of these abnormalities are thought to be irreversible (i.e., bronchiectasis, emphysema, areas of hyperlucency, and line shadows [1]). The population in the Turkish pediatric study was different from ours, and the imaging findings described probably resulted from infections (major bronchiectasis, hilar lymphadenopathies, or subsegmental or segmental atelectasis). We may not have observed these abnormalities in children because of the shorter duration of the disease (mean duration, 7.9 years). We hope that treating inflammation at an early stage of the disease may prevent such sequelae. However, the absence of visible sequelae does not exclude the possibility of their occurrence during childhood.

No correlation was found between areas of hyperlucency on expiratory scans and clinical severity or bronchial wall thickening scores on HRCT. These findings are consistent with those of Park et al. [17]. We will therefore no longer obtain expiratory scans.

In conclusion, asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that is common in pediatric patients. The initially reversible inflammation can progress as a result of remodeling and the formation of sequellar lesions. These stages are indirectly visible on HRCT scans.

We established a simple, objective, reproducible quantitative criterion for assessing bronchial wall thickening: counting all the visible bronchial sections in the right lung at three predefined levels. The symptomatic patients receiving treatment had bronchial wall thickening scores that were significantly higher than those of the control subjects.

In children with difficult-to-treat asthma, HRCT did not show any of the typical findings reported in adults, such as emphysema and bronchiectasis. This finding may be because the sequelae appear only after the disease has progressed for many years.

HRCT could be used in association with clinical and lung function data to assess the severity of asthma in patients with persistent asthma and perhaps to identify patients with a higher risk of remodeling. Furthermore, HRCT could be of use in decision-making to optimize the treatment of inflammation. Additional studies are required to investigate the links among clinical data, lung function test results, and scores for bronchial wall thickening on HRCT. Indications for HRCT during the follow-up period of children with difficult-to-treat asthma should be investigated.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Bousquet J, Jeffery PK, Busse WW, et al. Asthma: from bronchoconstriction to airways inflammation and remodeling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;5:1720 -1745
  2. Rennard SI. Repair mechanisms in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;6 Pt 2:S278 -286
  3. Bousquet J, Chanez P, Lacoste JY, et al. Asthma: a disease remodeling the airways. Allergy 1992;1:3 -11
  4. Carroll N, Elliot J, Morton A, et al. The structure of large and small airways in nonfatal and fatal asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;2:405 -410
  5. Webb WR, Müller NL, Naidich DP. Technical aspects of HRCT. In: Webb WR, Müller NL, Naidich DP, eds. High resolution CT of the lung, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996: 1-18
  6. National Institutes of Health. Guidelines for the diagnosis and the management of asthma: expert panel report 2. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1997:NIH publication no. 97-4051
  7. McKenzie SA. Difficult asthma in children. Eur Respir Review 2000;60:18 -22
  8. Delacourt C, Mani TM, Bonnerot V, et al. Computed tomography with normal chest radiograph in tuberculous infection. Arch Dis Child 1993;4:430 -432
  9. Gomez-Pastrana D, Torronteras R, Caro P, et al. Diagnosis of tuberculosis in children using a polymerase chain reaction. Pediatr Pulmonol 1999;5:344 -351
  10. [No authors listed] Proceedings of the ATS workshop on refractory asthma: current understanding, recommendations, and unanswered questions—American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;6:2341 -2351
  11. McLean AN, Sproule MW, Cowan MD, et al. High resolution computed tomography in asthma. Thorax 1998;4:308 -314
  12. Paganin F, Seneterre E, Chanez P, et al. Computed tomography of the lungs in asthma: influence of disease severity and etiology. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;1:110 -114
  13. Naidich DP, Zerhouni EA, Siegelman SS. Airways. In: Naidich DP, Zerhouni EA, Siegelman SS, eds. Computed tomography of the thorax. Philadelphia: Raven Press, 1984:83 -110
  14. Aberle DR, Gamsu G, Ray CS, et al. Asbestos-related pleural and parenchymal fibrosis: detection with high-resolution CT. Radiology 1988;3:729 -734
  15. Benoist MR, Brouard JJ, Rufin P, et al. Dissociation of symptom scores and bronchial hyperreactivity: study in asthmatic children on long-term treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate. Pediatr Pulmonol 1992;2:71 -77
  16. Lynch DA, Newell JD, Tschomper BA, et al. Uncomplicated asthma in adults: comparison of CT appearance of the lungs in asthmatic and healthy subjects. Radiology 1993;3:829 -833
  17. Park CS, Muller NL, Worthy SA, et al. Airway obstruction in asthmatic and healthy individuals: inspiratory and expiratory thin-section CT findings. Radiology 1997;2:361 -367
  18. Boulet L, Belanger M, Carrier G. Airway responsiveness and bronchial-wall thickness in asthma with or without fixed airflow obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;3:865 -871
  19. Awadh N, Muller NL, Park CS, et al. Airway wall thickness in patients with near fatal asthma and control groups: assessment with high resolution computed tomographic scanning. Thorax 1998;4:248 -253
  20. Niimi A, Matsumoto H, Amitani R, et al. Airway wall thickness in asthma assessed by computed tomography: relation to clinical indices. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1518 -1523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Okazawa M, Muller N, McNamara AE, et al. Human airway narrowing measured using high resolution computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;5:1557 -1562
  22. Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. AJR 2001;2:303 -306
  23. Sont JK, Willems LN, Bel EH, van Krieken JH, Vandenbroucke JP, Sterk PJ. Clinical control and histopathologic outcome of asthma when using airway hyperresponsiveness as an additional guide to long-term treatment: the AMPUL Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:1043 -1051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Woolcock AJ. Effect of drugs on small airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157[suppl]:S203 -S207[Medline]
  25. Martin RJ. Therapeutic significance of distal airway inflammation in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;2[suppl]:S447 -S460
  26. Goldin JG, Tashkin DP, Kleerup EC, et al. Comparative effects of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation on small airways: assessment with functional helical thin-section computed tomography. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;6[suppl]:S258 -S267
  27. Paganin F, Seneterre E, Chanez P, et al. Computed tomography of the lungs in asthma: influence of disease severity and etiology. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:110 -114[Abstract]
  28. Nuhoglu Y, Bahceciler N, Yuksel M, et al. Thorax high resolution computerized tomography findings in asthmatic children with unusual clinical manifestations. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999;3:311 -314

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Soja, P. Grzanka, K. Sladek, K. Okon, A. Cmiel, M. Mikos, S. Mikrut, G. Pulka, I. Gross-Sondej, E. Nizankowska-Mogilnicka, et al.
The Use of Endobronchial Ultrasonography in Assessment of Bronchial Wall Remodeling in Patients With Asthma
Chest, September 1, 2009; 136(3): 797 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. Bergeron, M. K. Tulic, and Q. Hamid
Tools used to measure airway remodelling in research
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2007; 29(3): 596 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. M. Aukland, T. Halvorsen, K. R. Fosse, A. K. Daltveit, and K. Rosendahl
High-Resolution CT of the Chest in Children and Young Adults Who Were Born Prematurely: Findings in a Population-Based Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 1012 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. S. Brody, H. A. W. M. Tiddens, R. G. Castile, H. O. Coxson, P. A. de Jong, J. Goldin, W. Huda, F. R. Long, M. McNitt-Gray, M. Rock, et al.
Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2005; 172(10): 1246 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
U G Rossi and C M Owens
The radiology of chronic lung disease in children
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marchac, V.
Right arrow Articles by Brunelle, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marchac, V.
Right arrow Articles by Brunelle, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS