AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Partik, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Metz, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Partik, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Metz, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 180:805-809
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Using a Dedicated Lung-Marker System for Localization of Pulmonary Nodules Before Thoracoscopic Surgery

Bernhard L. Partik1,2, Ann N. Leung1, Michael R. Müller3, Martin Breitenseher2, Franz Eckersberger3, Gerhard Dekan4, Thomas H. Helbich2 and Viktor Metz2

1 Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr., Rm. S-072, Stanford, CA 94305-5105.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A 1090 Vienna, Austria.
3 Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, University of Vienna, A 1090 Vienna, Austria.
4 Institute of Clinical Pathology, University of Vienna, A 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Received April 9, 2002; accepted after revision August 8, 2002.

 
B. L. Partik is supported by a Max Kade Grant.

Address correspondence to B. L. Partik.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially available dedicated lung-marker system for localization of pulmonary nodules before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Guidewires were positioned under CT fluoroscopy guidance in 16 patients (11 men, five women; age range, 39-79 years; mean age, 60.4 years). We measured the size of the targeted nodule, its distance to the closest pleural surface, the angle between the introducer needle and the chest wall, and the time for performance of the procedure in each patient. Note was made of any complications after guidewire placement.

RESULTS. In the 16 patients, the average nodule size was 6.7 mm (range, 3-12 mm), the average distance to the pleural surface was 10.6 mm (range, 3-22 mm), and the average pleural puncture angle was 59° (range, 25-78°). The marking procedure was completed within an average of 9.5 min (range, 7-15 min). Small pneumothoraces occurred in five (31.3%) of 16 patients. In 15 (93.8%) of 16 patients, thoracoscopic resection of the targeted nodule was successful; in one patient with dyspnea (6.3%), inaccurate localization resulting in an open thoracotomy occurred because an intervening fissure was not visualized. Dislodgement of the guidewire into the pleural space occurred in one patient (6.3%).

CONCLUSION. The dedicated lung-marker system is a fast and effective method for localization of pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic resection.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Appropriate management of a pulmonary nodule often requires a definitive pathologic diagnosis [1]. Previous studies have shown that the accuracy of CT-guided biopsy is significantly less for small pulmonary nodules than for nodules larger than 1 cm [2, 3]. Minimally invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is increasingly being used for the diagnosis of such small lesions [4]. However, nodules 1 cm or smaller are found on videothoracoscopy only if they are located within 1 cm of the pleural surface and are palpable with surgical equipment [4]. For all other nodules, which are potentially resectable through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, preoperative localization should be considered [5].

Previous studies with limited numbers of patients have reported various localization techniques including injection of coils [6], contrast media [7, 8], cyanoacrylate [9], and methylene blue [10]. Localization using guidewires has been reported in larger series, sometimes performed in combination with methylene blue injection [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. To our knowledge, all these reported guidewire systems were either custom-made or not specifically designed for lung tissue but rather for localization of breast lesions.

Recently, Kloeppel et al. [19] reported their initial results in five patients using a commercially available, CT-guided dedicated lung-marker system. In this study, planning of interventional parameters (cutaneous location, angle, and length of needle pass way) was performed using a laser marker system that was assembled in front of the gantry and calibrated to the CT unit with a phantom [20].

The goal of our study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the same lungmarker system in a larger number of patients under guidance of a more widely available CT fluoroscopy unit.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This prospective study was performed in accordance with institutional guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals. From May 2001 to March 2002, 16 consecutive patients (11 men, five women; age range, 39-79 years; mean age, 60.4 years) underwent guidewire placement before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The study population consisted of patients with pulmonary nodules recently diagnosed on CT who were referred to the department of cardiothoracic surgery. After we evaluated each patient's prior thoracic CT examinations, we included in the study those patients who had peripheral pulmonary nodules that were 10 mm or smaller at their maximal diameter, were located in a subpleural layer (distance to the pleural surface <= 25 mm), and were technically operable using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. One patient with a 12-mm nodule was also included because surgeons thought it would be technically difficult to target that particular nodule without guidewire localization.

Although no patient was excluded from this study, exclusion criteria for the procedure included nodules that would require a transfissural needle approach because of their location, bullae or blebs between the lesion and the pleural surface that were likely to cause an immediate pneumothorax and make deployment of the spiral guidewire tip impossible, severe dyspnea, and severe obesity requiring an introducer needle longer than 15 cm. In general, anticoagulation therapy would also be a contraindication for the marker procedure. However, all patients in our study population were scheduled for the procedure immediately before undergoing surgery; therefore, none was taking anticoagulation medication.

A primary malignancy was known to exist in nine patients at the time of referral. Melanoma was the most common malignancy, affecting three patients; carcinoma of the breast, rectum, kidney, liver, uterus, and myeloic leukemia were each present in one patient. The remaining individuals were referred for localization of asymptomatic nodules.

All examinations and interventions were performed on the same CT unit (Somatom Plus 4; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) by one of three board-certified radiologists experienced in CT-guided interventional techniques. The nodule was localized on a thin-section CT scan (collimation, 3 mm; table feed, 5 mm; reconstruction increment, 4 mm; 140 kV; 120 mAs) covering a maximal length of 10 cm. On the basis of nodule location, the patients were placed in the CT gantry to minimize lesion depth and optimize the wire approach and angulation in the supine (n = 10), prone (n = 5), or oblique (n = 1) position. Patients were requested not to change body or arm positions for the duration of the procedure.

The marker system we used was a localization kit (Marker System for Lung Metastasis; Somatex, Rietzneuendorf, Germany) consisting of an 18-gauge introducer needle (length, 12 or 15 cm) with a stylet, an insertion device, and a guidewire. The guidewire is monofil and made of ninitol to provide shape memory for the helically formed atraumatic guidewire tip (2.5 turns; diameter when deployed, 10 mm) (Fig. 1). All sets are packed with the guidewire loaded in the insertion device. The helical guidewire tip is advanced out of the end of the insertion device and shielded by a small cap. Before the intervention, the cap must be removed and the guidewire tip completely drawn into the insertion device.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Photograph of commercially available dedicated localization kit for pulmonary nodules used in this study shows introducer needle (a), insertion device (b), and guidewire with helical tip (c).

 

Local anesthesia was obtained using 1-2% subcutaneous lidocaine, with the injection extended to the level of the parietal pleura in an attempt to achieve deep anesthesia [16]. The introducer needle was then advanced under intermittent CT fluoroscopy guidance (collimation, 10 mm; 120 kV; 50 mAs) or real-time CT fluoroscopy adjacent to or into the nodule. No additional devices were used for manipulating the introducer needle. After withdrawal of the stylet, the insertion device with the preloaded localization wire was deployed at the same location. Deployment of the guidewire requires no rotational or screwing motion. Before removing the insertion needle and insertion device, we confirmed that the guidewire tip was correctly positioned. The angle between the introducer needle and the pleural surface was noted. We measured the time needed to perform the procedure from the application of local anesthetic to the removal of the introducer needle.

The external portion of the wire was loosely coiled on the patient's chest and draped with sterile covers. Subsequently, we determined whether pneumothorax, hematoma, or any other finding was present on a final thin-section CT scan obtained using the same parameters that were used for the initial scanning. Finally, we assessed the distance of the helical-shaped wire tip from the target.

The patient was then transported in a bed to the preoperative holding area. Any subjective complaints of patients were documented. A short written report and copies of relevant CT images were sent to the operating room.

Patients underwent surgery no more than 1.5 hr after the marking procedure was completed. After surgery, the thoracic surgeons were requested to fill in a standardized form documenting the position and accuracy of the guidewire localization.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In 15 (93.8%) of 16 patients, the guidewire was visualized in or adjacent to the pulmonary nodule as documented on the CT images (Fig. 2A,2B). In one patient with dyspnea, the guidewire tip was placed 13 mm dorsocaudad relative to the targeted nodule. The maximal diameter of pulmonary nodules, their closest distance to the pleural surface, and the histologic diagnosis for all patients are displayed in Table 1. Nodules were on average 6.7 mm in diameter and located at an average distance of 10.6 mm from the pleural surface. Histologically, six nodules were malignant, and ten were benign. Lesions were found in the right upper lobe (n = 6), right lower lobe (n = 7), left upper lobe (n = 2), and left lower lobe (n = 1) at the time of operation. The average angle between the introducer needle and the pleural surface was 59° (range, 25-78°). The marking procedure was completed within an average time of 9.5 min (range, 7-15 min).



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 39-year-old woman with history of uterine carcinoma. Axial CT fluoroscopic image (collimation, 10 mm) shows 4-mm pulmonary nodule in right lower lobe (histologically proven fibrous scar).

 


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 39-year-old woman with history of uterine carcinoma. Axial CT scan shows deployed guidewire tip in nodule (arrowhead).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Diameter, Distance to Pleural Surface, and Histologic Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules in 16 Patients

 

After the intervention, small pneumothoraces were found in five (31.3%) of 16 patients. In four of the five patients, the pneumothorax consisted of a small localized tenting of the visceral pleura surrounding the wire insertion site, with a maximal separation between the visceral and parietal pleura of less than 10 mm (Fig. 3). In the remaining patient, a 5-mm separation between the visceral and parietal pleura was seen along a larger extent of the chest wall. No hematomas were identified in any patient. One (6.3%) of 16 patients complained about breath-dependent pain near the guidewire insertion site approximately 5 min after completion of the procedure. No pneumothorax or hematoma was seen on the final CT scans or on conventional posteroanterior and lateral chest radiographs.



View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. 74-year-old woman with history of breast carcinoma and 4-mm pulmonary nodule in right lower lobe (histologically proven metastases from breast carcinoma). Axial CT scan (collimation, 3 mm) shows small tentlike pneumothorax (arrowhead) at insertion site of guidewire.

 

Intraoperatively, in 14 (87.5%) of 16 patients, the guidewire tip was found in or adjacent to the targeted nodule. Thoracoscopic resection of the targeted nodule was successful in 15 (93.8%) of 16 patients. In the patient with dyspnea, the nodule, which was assessed to be in the anterior aspect of the right lower lobe and localized via a posterior approach, was not found in the resection specimen. At open thoracotomy, the nodule was located in the posterior aspect of the upper lobe immediately anterior to the major fissure. Guidewire migration into the pleural space occurred at the time of lung deflation in one (6.3%) of 16 patients. In this patient, a puncture mark was seen on the visceral pleura, indicating the prior entry site of the wire into the lung. The nodule was successfully resected thoracoscopically using the entry site as a landmark.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
We report our experience with a dedicated lung-marker system to localize pulmonary nodules before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Our data revealed successful resection of pulmonary nodules via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in 15 (93.8%) of 16 patients after preoperative guidewire placement under CT fluoroscopy guidance.

Unlike other guidewires, the lung-marker system used in our study was designed specifically for lung parenchyma and is commercially available. The helical tip provides a cross-sectional area of 78 mm2 that allows thoracic surgeons to apply mild retractile force when tenting the lung so that easier access to the resection site is available and removal of the tissue can be achieved without causing wire dislodgement. Moreover, the shape memory of the wire potentially enables repositioning without deformation of the helical tip. Although previous studies have reported hematoma rates of 6.9-35.3%, we found no hematomas in the lung or chest wall in our patients [15, 16]. It is likely that our results are attributable to the monofil structure and atraumatic tip of the wire. Moreover, pneumothoraces were seen in only 31.3% of patients in our study, as compared with 45.5-50% of patients in studies using other systems [14, 16, 18].

Under guidance of CT fluoroscopy, we achieved a rapid targeting of small nodules with an average size of 6.7 mm. Our marking procedure was completed within an average of 9.5 min, whereas Friedrich et al. [21] reported a range of 12-21 min for their first three procedures when using a laser marker system for guidance. Other authors have reported procedure times ranging from 20-60 min for the localization of pulmonary nodules under CT guidance [11, 12, 17, 18]. However, comparison of procedure times remains difficult, because precise definitions for times measured are not available in the literature.

Our technique was well tolerated by the patients. Only one (6.3%) of 16 patients complained of pain after the procedure, which likely was due to pleural irritation at the insertion site of the guidewire. No associated complications were seen on this patient's CT scan obtained after the intervention.

In 15 (93.8%) of 16 patients, the guidewire was located in or adjacent to a variety of benign and malignant lung lesions as documented on thin-section CT scans. In one patient, the guidewire tip was placed 13 mm dorsocaudad relative to the targeted 8-mm nodule, which was located 20 mm from the pleural surface. Repositioning was not attempted because video-assisted thoracoscopic resection usually includes all lung tissue within 20 mm of the wire tip and because this patient had severe dyspnea. However, the nodule was not present in the resection specimen. At open thoracotomy, the guidewire was found deployed in the lower lobe, whereas the nodule was located in the upper lobe just anterior to the major fissure. Retrospective review of the postintervention CT scan showed that significant motion artifact resulted in nonvisualization of the intervening fissure. In general, care must be taken when nodules are in a perifissural location to ensure that the needle approach does not cross any fissures and thus complicate thoracoscopic resection [16].

Guidewire dislodgement into the pleural space was found in one (6.3%) of 16 patients after surgical deflation of the lung. In this patient, the targeted nodule was 10 mm in maximal diameter and located 3 mm from the chest wall adjacent to a rib, near the medial border of the scapula. Successful placement of the guidewire required an acute pleural puncture angle of 25° (Fig. 4), whereas an average puncture angle of 61.6° (range, 40-78°) was used in the remainder of our patients. In our opinion, the shallow angle between the introducer needle and the pleural surface as well as the short length of the guidewire inserted into the lung parenchyma predisposed the wire to dislodgement.



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. 56-year-old man with no known malignancy and 10-mm pulmonary nodule in left lower lobe (histologically proven hamartoma). Axial CT fluoroscopic image (collimation, 10 mm) shows nodule in subpleural location and shallow angle of introducer needle (arrowhead) relative to pleural surface.

 

Previous studies have reported dislodged dedicated breast-marker systems in 6-60% of patients [14,15,16, 18, 22]. As an adjunct to guidewire placement, some investigators have also injected methylene blue to create a tattoo on the pleural surface that can serve as a guide in case of wire dislodgement [11, 16]. However, the use of methylene blue is controversial because some patients may suffer from adverse effects such as hypotension and bronchospasm [15]. Although no complications were encountered in the series by Thaete et al. [16], the site of the methylene blue injection was not visualized on videothoracoscopy in nine of their 22 cases of wire dislodgement.

In general, wire dislodgement may occur at the time of lung deflation, during the resection when the surgeon applies gentle retraction on the wire to tent the lung or during transport to the operating room [14]. The delicate parenchyma of the lung provides much less resistance when traction force is applied than does breast tissue. Because the anchoring power of the guidewire tip is related to the cross-sectional area of the hook, Mullan et al. [14] developed a custom-made guidewire with a hook in the shape of a cloverleaf consisting of four loops oriented at 90° to each other; none of the five cloverleaf wires deployed in their series dislodged. Kanazawa et al. [23, 24] developed a short guidewire with a long nylon suture attached to its proximal end to decrease guidewire inflexibility and rigidity—characteristics that these authors believe contribute to guidewire dislodgement, particularly during patient transport. Although wire dislodgement occurred in only three (8.1%) of 37 patients in the Kanazawa et al. series [24], the cross-sectional area of their hookwire (diameter, 0.28 mm) is small and may predispose the wire to dislodgement when greater degrees of tensile force are applied.

Our study has several limitations. First, the relatively small size of our sample precludes any firm conclusions regarding the incidence of complications in comparison with other techniques. However, the present data and usefulness for both patients and thoracic surgeons are promising. Second, it is possible that the true incidence of pneumothoraces was underestimated because the diagnosis was made on CT scans acquired after the intervention. We cannot rule out that delayed pneumothoraces might have occurred on the way to the operating room. However, no patient required drainage for relief of a symptomatic pneumothorax.

If the use of low-dose helical CT to screen for early-stage lung cancer becomes wide-spread, it is likely that radiologists in the near future will encounter an increasing number of small pulmonary nodules [25]. We presume that such findings will also increase the number of patients requiring thoracic surgery. The use of a feasible, safe, and fast marker system for small nodules can facilitate surgical resection by accurately localizing the lesion, thereby reducing the amount of resected tissue as well as obviating open thoracotomy. Compared with open thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery decreases operating time, length of patient stay in the hospital, costs, and patient discomfort [4].

In conclusion, the dedicated lung-marker system used in conjunction with CT fluoroscopy is a fast and effective method for localization of pulmonary nodules. Small pneumothoraces were the most frequent complication in five (31.3%) of 16 patients. When nodules are in a perifissural location, care must be taken to ensure the needle approach does not cross any fissures, because this will complicate thoracoscopic resection.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Shaffer K. Role of radiology for imaging and biopsy of solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 1999;116:519S -522S[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Li H, Boiselle PM, Shepard JO, Trotman-Dickenson B, McLoud TC. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: comparison of small and large pulmonary nodules. AJR 1996;167:105 -109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tsukada H, Satou T, Iwashima A, Souma T. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided automated needle biopsy of lung nodules. AJR 2000;175:239 -243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Eckersberger F. Guidelines in minimal invasive surgery in oncologic thoracic surgery. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1997;114:246 -250
  5. Suzuki K, Nagai K, Yoshida J, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small indeterminate pulmonary nodules: indications for preoperative marking. Chest 1999;115:563 -568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lizza N, Eucher P, Haxhe JP, De Wispelaere JF, Johnson PM, Delaunois L. Thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules after computed tomographic-guided coil labeling. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:986 -988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Moon SW, Wang YP, Jo KH, et al. Fluoroscopyaided thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodule localized with contrast media. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1815 -1820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Okumura T, Kondo H, Suzuki K, et al. Fluoroscopy-assisted thoracoscopic surgery after computed tomography-guided bronchoscopic barium marking. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:439 -442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yoshida J, Nagai K, Nishimura M, Takahashi K. Computed tomography-fluoroscopy guided injection of cyanoacrylate to mark a pulmonary nodule for thoracoscopic resection. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;47:210 -213[Medline]
  10. Lenglinger FX, Schwarz CD, Artmann W. Localization of pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic surgery: value of percutaneous staining with methylene blue. AJR 1994;163:297 -300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. de Kerviler E, Gossot D, Frija J. Localization techniques for the thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules. Int Surg 1996;81:241 -244[Medline]
  12. Gossot D, Miaux Y, Guermazi A, Celerier M, Friga J. The hook-wire technique for localization of pulmonary nodules during thoracoscopic resection. Chest 1994;105:1467 -1469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Mack MJ, Shennib H, Landreneau RJ, Hazelrigg SR. Techniques for localization of pulmonary nodules for thoracoscopic resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:550 -553[Abstract]
  14. Mullan BF, Stanford W, Barnhart W, Galvin JR. Lung nodules: improved wire for CT-guided localization. Radiology 1999;211:561 -565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Shah RM, Spirn PW, Salazar AM, et al. Localization of peripheral pulmonary nodules for thoracoscopic excision: value of CT-guided wire placement. AJR 1993;161:279 -283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Thaete FL, Peterson MS, Plunkett MB, Ferson PF, Keenan RJ, Landreneau RJ. Computed tomography-guided wire localization of pulmonary lesions before thoracoscopic resection: results in 101 cases. J Thorac Imag 1999;14:90 -98[Medline]
  17. Templeton PA, Krasna M. Localization of pulmonary nodules for thoracosopic resection: use of needle/wire breast-biopsy system. AJR 1993;160:761 -762[Free Full Text]
  18. Shepard JA, Mathisen DJ, Muse VV, Bhalla M, McLoud TC. Needle localization of peripheral lung nodules for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Chest 1994;105:1559 -1563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kloeppel R, Friedrich T, Eichfeld U, Wilke W, Kahn T. CT-guided marking of pulmonary lesions before thoracoscopic resection [in German]. Radiologe 2001;41:201 -204[Medline]
  20. Kloeppel R, Weisse T, Deckert F, Wilke W, Pecher S. CT-guided intervention using a patient laser marker system. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1010 -1014[Medline]
  21. Friedrich T, Kloeppel R, Steinert M, Eichfeld U. Thoracoscopic resection of intrapulmonary lesions after CT-guided marking. In: Bruch HP, Koeckerling F, Bouchard R, Schug-Pass C, eds. New aspects of high technology in medicine: proceedings of 1st Congress of High Technology in Medicine. New York: Medimond, 2000:87 -91
  22. Plunkett MB, Peterson MS, Landreneau RJ, Ferson PF, Posner MC. Peripheral pulmonary nodules: pre-operative percutaneous needle localization with CT guidance. Radiology 1992;185:274 -276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kanazawa S, Ando A, Yasui K, et al. Localization of small pulmonary nodules for thoracoscopic resection: use of a newly developed hookwire system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1995;18:122 -124[Medline]
  24. Kanazawa S, Ando A, Yasui K, et al., Localization of pulmonary nodules for thoracoscopic resection: experience with a system using a short hookwire and suture. AJR 1998;170:332 -334[Free Full Text]
  25. Leef JL 3rd, Klein JS. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:123 -143[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Koyama, Y. Hama, Y. Urano, D. M. Nguyen, P. L. Choyke, and H. Kobayashi
Spectral Fluorescence Molecular Imaging of Lung Metastases Targeting HER2/neu
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 2936 - 2945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
W. Chen, L. Chen, S. Yang, Z. Chen, G. Qian, S. Zhang, and J. Jing
A Novel Technique for Localization of Small Pulmonary Nodules
Chest, May 1, 2007; 131(5): 1526 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. J. Jeong, C. A. Yi, and K. S. Lee
Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Detection, Characterization, and Guidance for Further Diagnostic Workup and Treatment
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 57 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. Pompeo, D. Mineo, P. Rogliani, A. F. Sabato, and T. C. Mineo
Feasibility and Results of Awake Thoracoscopic Resection of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1761 - 1768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. M. Daniel, T. A. Altes, P. K. Rehm, M. B. Williams, D. R. Jones, A. V. Stolin, and S. B. Gay
A novel technique for localization and excisional biopsy of small or Ill-defined pulmonary lesions
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 77(5): 1756 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Partik, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Metz, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Partik, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Metz, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS