AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlesinger, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by DiPietro, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlesinger, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by DiPietro, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 180:1147-1153
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

Neonates and Umbilical Venous Catheters: Normal Appearance, Anomalous Positions, Complications, and Potential Aid to Diagnosis

Alan E. Schlesinger1, Richard M. Braverman1 and Michael A. DiPietro2

1 Edward B. Singleton Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin St., MC2-2521, Houston, TX 77030.
2 Department of Radiology, C. S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0252.

Received July 12, 2002; accepted after revision August 28, 2002.

 
Address correspondence to A. E. Schlesinger.

Presented at the annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society, Seattle, April–May 2001.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Normal Vascular Course of...
Anomalous Positioning of the...
Complications Associated with...
Umbilical Venous Catheter as...
References
 
Umbilical venous catheters are commonly used in the neonatal period for vascular access. Despite their routine use, they are frequently malpositioned and may occasionally be associated with complications. Furthermore, an unusual course of an umbilical venous catheter may aid in the diagnosis of cardiovascular or other anomalies. We review the normal vascular course and radiographic appearance of umbilical venous catheters, several common and rare anomalous positions of umbilical venous catheters, potential complications associated with umbilical venous catheters, and unusual courses of these catheters that may provide clues to the diagnosis of underlying anomalies. To provide optimal patient care, the radiologist interpreting neonatal radiographs should be familiar with these potential anomalous umbilical venous catheter courses and complications.


Normal Vascular Course of Umbilical Venous Catheters and Normal Radiographic Appearance
Top
Introduction
Normal Vascular Course of...
Anomalous Positioning of the...
Complications Associated with...
Umbilical Venous Catheter as...
References
 
The single umbilical vein extends from the umbilicus to the left portal vein and initially maintains an anterior, midline location in the anterior abdominal wall until it courses posteriorly through the liver to the left portal vein. There is a focal dilatation of the umbilical vein just before its junction with the left portal vein: the umbilical recess [1]. When blood from the umbilical vein reaches the left portal vein, it is directed to the ductus venosus, which originates from the left portal vein immediately opposite the insertion site of the umbilical vein and courses cephalad to the inferior vena cava (Fig. 1). In contrast, the typically paired, bilateral umbilical arteries initially course posteriorly and caudally to enter the right and left iliac arteries. Therefore, the umbilical venous catheter and the umbilical artery catheter can be easily distinguished on abdominal radiographs. The umbilical venous catheter predominantly follows an anterior and cephalad course in the midline umbilical vein until directed posteriorly in the liver, whereas the umbilical artery catheter is initially directed caudally and posteriorly to enter either the right or left iliac artery before coursing superiorly in the more posteriorly positioned aorta (Fig. 2A, 2B).



View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Postmortem venogram in 27-week premature neonate shows normal anatomy. Umbilical vein enters left portal vein opposite origin of ductus venosus. Focal dilatation of umbilical vein just inferior to its insertion into left portal vein is umbilical recess. Ductus venosus begins at left portal vein opposite site of insertion of umbilical vein and courses to inferior vena cava, entering inferior vena cava at or near confluence of inferior vena cava and hepatic veins. (Adapted with permission from [1])

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. Normal radiographic appearance of umbilical venous catheter and umbilical artery catheter. Frontal radiograph of abdomen shows that umbilical venous catheter enters abdomen at umbilicus (small arrowhead), travels in cephalad direction in umbilical vein (double black arrows) (note that catheters cross just above umbilicus), courses through left portal vein and ductus venosus, enters inferior vena cava, and terminates in right atrium. Umbilical artery catheter also enters abdomen at umbilicus (single black arrow) but extends inferiorly (white arrow) and posteriorly into iliac artery before coursing superiorly in aorta (large arrowheads).

 


View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. Normal radiographic appearance of umbilical venous catheter and umbilical artery catheter. Lateral radiograph shows anterior location of umbilical venous catheter in abdomen until catheter reaches inferior vena cava and right atrium. Umbilical artery catheter enters abdomen at umbilicus (arrowhead) but courses posteriorly as it descends inferiorly in abdomen to enter umbilical artery before ascending in posteriorly located aorta (arrow).

 

The preferred location of the tip of the umbilical venous catheter is typically in the cephalad portion of the inferior vena cava or at the inferior vena caval–right atrial junction. Air might be introduced inadvertently into the intrahepatic portal venous system at the time of umbilical venous catheter insertion. The air is usually transient and should not be misinterpreted as evidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (Fig. 3). Portal venous air associated with necrotizing enterocolitis will typically be accompanied by pneumatosis intestinalis, whereas air introduced into the portal venous system at the time of umbilical venous catheter insertion is usually an isolated finding.



View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Radiograph of abdomen shows air in portal venous branches associated with umbilical venous catheter insertion. Inconsequential transient portal venous air can be seen immediately after umbilical venous catheter insertion and should not necessarily be attributed to necrotizing enterocolitis.

 


Anomalous Positioning of the Umbilical Venous Catheter
Top
Introduction
Normal Vascular Course of...
Anomalous Positioning of the...
Complications Associated with...
Umbilical Venous Catheter as...
References
 
Anomalous positioning of the umbilical venous catheter occurs frequently because the catheter is inserted by the pediatrician without imaging guidance. If the umbilical venous catheter follows the normal course to the inferior vena cava or right atrium but is advanced too far, the umbilical venous catheter may extend through a patent foramen ovale or an atrial septal defect into the left atrium (Fig. 4) or, if advanced farther, into a pulmonary vein, most commonly the pulmonary vein of the left upper lobe (Figs. 5 and 6). Alternatively, the catheter may continue through the right atrium and into the superior vena cava (Fig. 7) or may cross the tricuspid valve and enter the right ventricle. If advanced, the umbilical venous catheter may continue into the main, right, or left pulmonary artery.



View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. Umbilical venous catheter in left atrium. Radiograph of chest and abdomen shows that umbilical venous catheter crosses atrial septum through patent foramen ovale, and tip terminates in left atrium.

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Umbilical venous catheter with tip in pulmonary vein of left upper lobe. Chest radiograph reveals that umbilical venous catheter enters right atrium, crosses patent foramen ovale into left atrium, and ends in pulmonary vein of left upper lobe.

 


View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. Umbilical venous catheter with tip in pulmonary vein of right upper lobe. Radiograph of chest and abdomen shows that umbilical venous catheter crosses foramen ovale, coils in left atrium, and enters pulmonary vein of right upper lobe.

 


View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7. Full-term neonate with transient tachypnea of newborn and umbilical venous catheter in superior vena cava. Chest radiograph reveals that umbilical venous catheter has been advanced into inferior vena cava, through right atrium, and into superior vena cava.

 

The umbilical venous catheter can be misdirected before reaching the expected location of the inferior vena cava or right atrium. The tip of the umbilical venous catheter can coil in the umbilical recess before entering the left portal vein (Fig. 8). If after coiling in the umbilical recess, the umbilical venous catheter is advanced farther, it may travel in a retrograde direction in the umbilical vein toward the umbilicus (Fig. 9). Rarely, the umbilical venous catheter may reach the inferior vena cava but may progress caudally rather than cranially in the inferior vena cava (Fig. 10). If the umbilical venous catheter reaches the left portal vein but does not continue into the ductus venosus, the catheter can travel left into the more peripheral left portal vein (Fig. 11) or right, where it can eventually course into the right portal vein (Fig. 12) or hepatofugally into the main portal vein (or potentially farther into the vessels that merge to form the portal vein: the superior mesenteric and splenic veins) (Fig. 13).



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8. Umbilical venous catheter coiled in umbilical recess. Portable radiograph of abdomen in neonate after umbilical venous catheter placement shows catheter tip coiled in umbilical recess.

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9. Portable radiograph of abdomen shows that umbilical venous catheter coils in umbilical recess and then continues in retrograde direction in umbilical vein toward umbilicus.

 


View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10. Umbilical venous catheter with distal tip in right hemipelvis. Abdominal radiograph shows that catheter enters umbilicus (arrowheads), which projects to left of midline because of patient rotation, and follows expected course through umbilical vein (white arrows) until it reaches inferior vena cava and is directed inferiorly into inferior vena cava (black arrows), through right common iliac vein, and finally into right femoral vein.

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11. Umbilical venous catheter in peripheral left portal vein. Radiograph of abdomen shows that umbilical venous catheter enters left portal vein but, rather than entering ductus venosus, continues in leftward direction into more peripheral portion of left portal vein. Note normal prominent left hepatic lobe in neonate.

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12. Umbilical venous catheter in right portal vein. Radiograph of chest and abdomen shows that umbilical venous catheter reaches left portal vein via umbilical vein but enters right portal vein instead of crossing ductus venosus into inferior vena cava.

 


View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 13. Umbilical venous catheter in splenic vein. Abdominal radiograph reveals that umbilical venous catheter courses through umbilical vein into left portal vein but then travels into main portal vein (arrow) and eventually into splenic vein (arrowhead).

 


Complications Associated with Umbilical Venous Catheters
Top
Introduction
Normal Vascular Course of...
Anomalous Positioning of the...
Complications Associated with...
Umbilical Venous Catheter as...
References
 
If the umbilical venous catheter perforates an intrahepatic vascular wall, a hepatic hematoma may result [2]. These hematomas may eventually calcify. A hepatic hematoma is typically identified on sonography, usually requested for poor blood return from the umbilical venous catheter or because fluids cannot be easily administered though the catheter (Fig. 14A, 14B). If fluids are administered through an umbilical venous catheter with its tip in an extravascular location, fluid collections may be seen on sonography. These collections may be anechoic, heterogeneous, or echogenic, depending on the type of fluid and the elapsed time. Intravascular thrombi may form along the course of the umbilical venous catheter, likely related to intimal injury [3], and may be identified on radiography, sonography (Fig. 15), or CT (Fig. 16A, 16B, 16C). The umbilical venous catheter can also perforate the right or left atrial wall and enter the pericardial space (Fig. 17A, 17B, 17C).



View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14A. Hepatic hematoma caused by extravascular intraparenchymal positioning of umbilical venous catheter tip. Sonogram of abdomen, obtained because umbilical venous catheter could not be easily flushed, reveals catheter tip (arrow) adjacent to echogenic focus in liver parenchyma.

 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14B. Hepatic hematoma caused by extravascular intraparenchymal positioning of umbilical venous catheter tip. Follow-up sonogram reveals decreased size of hematoma with increased echogenicity (arrow) and acoustic shadowing consistent with calcification.

 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 15. Calcification in ductus venosus and left portal vein. Sonogram shows echogenic calcified thrombus (arrows) in ductus venosus and left portal vein in neonate with prior umbilical venous catheter.

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 16A. Calcified thrombus in patient with prior umbilical venous catheter. Unenhanced CT image shows calcified thrombus in inferior vena cava.

 


View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 16B. Calcified thrombus in patient with prior umbilical venous catheter. Unenhanced CT scan (more caudual than A) reveals extension of thrombus into region of ductus venosus.

 


View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 16C. Calcified thrombus in patient with prior umbilical venous catheter. Unenhanced CT image (more caudal than B) confirms extension of calcified thrombus into umbilical vein.

 


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 17A. Perforation of left atrial appendage. (Courtesy of Yousefzadeh D, Chicago, IL) Frontal radiograph of chest after catheter placement shows coiled catheter superimposed over cardiac silhouette.

 


View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 17B. Perforation of left atrial appendage. (Courtesy of Yousefzadeh D, Chicago, IL) Lateral radiograph also reveals catheter (arrow) coiled over cardiac silhouette.

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 17C. Perforation of left atrial appendage. (Courtesy of Yousefzadeh D, Chicago, IL) Frontal radiograph after contrast injection confirms that umbilical venous catheter tip is in pericardial space. Catheter has crossed atrial septum through patent foramen ovale and perforated left atrial appendage to enter pericardial space (arrowhead denotes presumed region of wall of left atrial appendage).

 


Umbilical Venous Catheter as an Aid to Diagnosis
Top
Introduction
Normal Vascular Course of...
Anomalous Positioning of the...
Complications Associated with...
Umbilical Venous Catheter as...
References
 
Although the umbilical venous catheter is not placed for this purpose, its course may aid in the diagnosis of congenital abnormalities causing displacement of the liver, such as anomalous positioning of the liver into the chest in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (Fig. 18).



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 18. Umbilical venous catheter position confirming intrathoracic displacement of liver in patient with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Umbilicus and proximal umbilical venous catheter (arrowheads) project to left of midline because of patient rotation on this chest and abdominal radiograph in neonate with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Position of distal umbilical venous catheter (arrow) confirms intrathoracic location of liver.

 

Congenital cardiovascular lesions may be deduced from an anomalous course of an umbilical venous catheter. An umbilical venous catheter can cross the interatrial septum from the right atrium to the left atrium (and ultimately into a pulmonary vein if advanced farther) via a true atrial septal defect or, more likely, via a patent foramen ovale, which will likely eventually close spontaneously (Fig. 4). In infants with a persistent left superior vena cava, the anomalous vessel terminates in the coronary sinus of the right atrium. An umbilical venous catheter entering the coronary sinus and extending cephalad into a left superior vena cava can be misinterpreted on imaging as crossing a patent foramen ovale into the left atrium and eventually into the pulmonary vein of the left upper lobe. However, if the catheter has been advanced far enough into the left superior vena cava to reach the periphery of the left hemithorax or into the left jugular vein in the neck, the diagnosis of persistent left superior vena cava is likely (Fig. 19).



View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 19. Neonate with trisomy 21 syndrome and complete atrioventricular canal with persistent left superior vena cava. Umbilical venous catheter enters right atrium and then follows course suggesting it has crossed patent foramen ovale into left atrium and eventually into pulmonary vein of left upper lobe on this portable chest and abdominal radiograph. However, catheter extends beyond lung, indicating that it cannot be within pulmonary vein or artery. Therefore, we deduced that umbilical venous catheter had exited right atrium via coronary sinus, been advanced through persistent left superior vena cava, and eventually entered left jugular vein (confirmed on echocardiography [not shown]). Persistent left superior vena cava had not been identified on initial echocardiogram (not shown), and knowledge of this congenital vascular anomaly was important when treating patient with cardiac bypass during surgery for congenital heart disease.

 


References
Top
Introduction
Normal Vascular Course of...
Anomalous Positioning of the...
Complications Associated with...
Umbilical Venous Catheter as...
References
 

  1. Richter E, Lierse W. Imaging anatomy of the newborn. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1991: 151–171
  2. Singleton EB. Radiologic considerations of intensive care in the premature infant. Radiology 1981;140:291 –300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Friedman AP, Haller JO, Boyer B, et al. Calcified portal vein thromboemboli in infants. Radiology 1981;140:381 –382[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. B. Hunter and M. S. Taljanovic
Medical Devices of the Abdomen and Pelvis
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 503 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlesinger, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by DiPietro, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlesinger, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by DiPietro, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS