AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Partik, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pokieser, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Partik, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pokieser, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 180:987-992
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Videofluoroscopy of Swallowing Abnormalities in 22 Symptomatic Patients After Cardiovascular Surgery

Bernhard L. Partik1, Martina Scharitzer1, Gerd Schueller1, Martin Voracek2, Wolfgang Schima1, Ewald Schober1, Michael R. Mueller3, Ann N. Leung1, Doris-Maria Denk4 and Peter Pokieser1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
2 Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Documentation and Statistics Branch, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
3 Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
4 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

Received July 2, 2002; accepted after revision August 29, 2002.

 
Address correspondence to B. L. Partik.

B. L. Partik is supported by a Max Kade grant. Study supported by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Radiologic Tumor Research.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the types of swallowing abnormalities that occur in symptomatic patients who have undergone cardiovascular surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. From 1994 to 2001, 22 patients (17 males and five females; age range, 4–89 years; mean age, 64 years) who had swallowing abnormalities after cardiovascular surgery were referred for a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Each study was analyzed for functional abnormalities of the tongue, soft palate, epiglottis, hyoid and larynx, pharynx, upper esophageal sphincter, and esophagus. Also, the performance of transesophageal echocardiography, long-term intubation, or both was noted.

RESULTS. Swallowing abnormalities were present in 18 patients (81.8%) (range, one to eight functional abnormalities; mean, 3.9 functional abnormalities). The distribution of abnormalities across the functional units statistically significantly deviated ({chi}2 = 14.4; df = 6; p = 0.025) from uniform distribution, with abnormalities most commonly involving the hyoid and larynx (13 patients [59.1%]) and the pharynx (10 patients [45.5%]). Aspiration was found in 13 patients (59.1%) (predeglutitive, n = 1; intradeglutitive, n = 4; postdeglutitive, n = 3; and mixed, n = 5). In the 14 patients (63.6%) who underwent transesophageal echocardiography, long-term intubation, or both, we frequently found incomplete tilting of the epiglottis, pharyngeal weakness, and postdeglutitive aspiration.

CONCLUSION. Most patients with swallowing problems after cardiovascular surgery present with multiple abnormalities that most commonly affect the hyoid and larynx and the pharynx and result predominantly in intra- or postdeglutitive aspiration. The performance of transesophageal echocardiography and long-term intubation may influence the types of swallowing abnormalities.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Respiratory failure is the major cause of death after thoracic surgery and is most likely caused by aspiration and pneumonia [1]. Swallowing dysfunction, which has been documented in 3–4% of patients who have undergone cardiac surgery, is associated with increased morbidity and results in a doubling of hospital charges and a tripling in the hospital length of stay [2, 3]. To our knowledge, no investigation has been conducted in these subjects assessing the entire bolus transfer from the oral cavity to the esophagus with special emphasis on the type (pre-, intra-, or postdeglutitive) of aspiration. However, this information is crucial for precise planning of postoperative functional swallowing therapy and the optimal type of feeding [4, 5]. For evaluation of dysphagia and aspiration, videoendoscopic and videofluoroscopic swallowing studies are the diagnostic methods of choice. Videofluoroscopy is the gold standard for the assessment of swallowing abnormalities in all four swallowing phases [6, 7]. The objective of our study was to evaluate videofluoroscopically the types of swallowing abnormalities that occur in symptomatic patients who have undergone cardiovascular surgery.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
In the study period from 1994 to 2001, 54 consecutive patients from a total of 17,775 patients who underwent cardiovascular or thoracic surgery and who had symptoms indicative of a swallowing abnormality were referred for a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Videofluoroscopic and clinical findings as well as demographic data were entered into a computer database (Excel; Microsoft, Redmond, WA). The duration and type of subjective complaints of all patients were recorded on a standardized form. We retrospectively reviewed the computer database, standardized forms, and patients' medical records. Subsequently, we enrolled in this study those 22 patients (17 males and five females; age range, 4–89 years; mean age, 64 years) who underwent cardiovascular surgery, had no history of swallowing abnormality before cardiovascular surgery, presented with clinical signs of aspiration (e.g., coughing, choking, recurrent pulmonary infections) after surgery (n = 18), or had dysphagia for solids and liquids (n = 2) or globus sensation (n = 2). We subjectively dated their symptoms to the time of the surgical procedure. The mean interval between surgery and the videofluoroscopic swallowing study was 96 days (range, 6–310 days). We excluded those patients who underwent procedures other than cardiovascular surgery, who had incomplete documentation of procedures, or who did not date their complaints to the time of the surgical procedure.

Patients' histories included remote ischemic stroke (n = 7), diabetes mellitus (n = 6), goiter (n = 2), postoperative neurologic deficit (n = 1), and tracheostomy (n = 1). The histories of seven patients (31.8%) were unremarkable regarding underlying diseases or conditions that are considered to cause swallowing abnormalities. The patients underwent surgery for replacement of the aortic (n = 7) or mitral valve (n = 3), aortocoronary bypass grafting (n = 4), heart transplantation (n = 2), patent ductus arteriosus (n = 2), aneurysms of the thoracic aorta (n = 2), atrial septal defect (n = 1), and transposition of the subclavian artery (n = 1). Fourteen (63.6%) of 22 patients underwent intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (n = 4), long-term intubation (n = 4) defined as more than 8 days [8], or both (n = 6). Six patients underwent CT of the brain during the time between surgery and the swallowing study. In five patients, four of whom had a documented history of stroke, CT showed remote ischemic changes. In the sixth patient, findings of the head CT were normal.

Technique
All examinations were carried out by one of three board-certified investigators experienced in performing swallowing studies using a fluoroscopy unit with an undercouch tube (Pantoskop 5; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) connected to a video recorder (Betacam BVW 75 SP; Sony, Tokyo, Japan). Videofluoroscopic studies were performed in lateral and anteroposterior projections with the patient in the upright position. In patients with suspected aspiration, swallowing studies were started with 3 mL of thin liquid and non-ionic iodinated contrast material ([iopamidol] Gastromiro; Amersham Health, Vienna, Austria). If the patient was able to swallow a bolus of 3 mL, the bolus size was sequentially increased to 5, 10, and 15 mL [9]. In patients with aspiration, the examination was terminated [10]. In patients without evidence of aspiration, this sequential augmentation of the bolus size was repeated with a high-density (250% g per volume) barium suspension (Prontobario [barium sulfate], Gerot, Vienna, Austria). In patients with dysphagia or globus sensation, the examination was started with a bolus of 15 mL of high-density barium suspension. If the patient had no difficulty in swallowing a 15 mL bolus, the patient was asked to swallow a bolus of 30 mL [9]. The videofluoroscopic studies of all patients were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists experienced in performing and interpreting swallowing studies. The videofluoroscopic tapes of all patients were reviewed in real time and slow motion frame by frame. The radiographic interpretation was made by consensus of the two radiologists.

Image Analysis of the Seven Functional Swallowing Units
Oral cavity.—We assessed the upload of the contrast bolus on the tongue. Findings of weakness of the tongue and leaking were deemed positive when retentions of contrast material on the hard palate or the back of the tongue were seen after the contrast bolus had left the oral cavity and when contrast material was seen in the pharynx before initiation of swallowing, respectively [7].

Soft palate.—Posterior sealing of the oral cavity and appropriateness of elevation on swallowing were assessed. Incomplete posterior sealing may result in premature leakage of contrast material into the pharynx, whereas inadequate elevation may result in nasal regurgitation [7].

Epiglottis.—Impaired epiglottic movement was defined as absent or incomplete tilting if the epiglottis did not completely invert [9].

Hyoid and larynx.—Reduced hyoid elevation was defined as limited superior or anterior movement of the hyoid during swallowing. Laryngeal elevation was considered reduced if it did not exceed that of the hyoid during swallowing [11]. Penetration of contrast medium into the upper, subepiglottic portion of the laryngeal vestibule was considered normal [12]. Penetration of contrast material into the lower, supraglottic portion of the larynx and aspiration into the subglottis and trachea were considered abnormal [12]. Aspiration was classified according to the time of its occurrence as pre-, intra-, or postdeglutitive (before, during, or after swallowing) [10].

Pharynx.—The triggering of the swallowing reflex was considered normal when swallowing was initiated immediately after arrival of contrast material at the level of the valleculae [7]. Pharyngeal weakness or paresis was diagnosed when there was diminished or absent obliteration of the pharynx by the peristaltic pharyngeal contraction [13].

Upper esophageal sphincter.—The opening of the upper esophageal sphincter was considered normal if no posterior indentation of the pharyngoesophageal segment occurred during bolus passage [14]. Upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction was divided into four types: delayed opening, incomplete opening, premature closure, and prolonged opening on swallowing [9]. Other causes of obstruction at the level of the upper esophageal sphincter (cervical osteophytes, strictures, webs) were noted.

Esophagus.—The esophageal bolus passage was assessed for a proximal bolus escape, which was deemed present when a portion of the contrast bolus remained in the upper part of the esophagus or showed retrograde movement [15]. Furthermore, we assessed the presence of support levels, which were defined as fluid–air interfaces in the esophagus, and of tertiary contractions, which were defined as nonperistaltic contractions that were often multiple and simultaneous and caused focal but transient narrowings of the esophageal lumen. Also, we noted the presence of hiatal hernia, diverticula, and reflux of contrast material from the stomach to the esophagus [15].

Statistical Analysis
For assessing whether the abnormal findings were uniformly distributed across the seven functional units of swallowing, we used the exact version of the one-sample chi-square goodness-of-fit test, as implemented in the StatXact software (CYTEL Software, Cambridge, MA), which is tailored for small-sample data analysis [16]. Value combinations of the variables of transesophageal echocardiography (yes/no) and long-term intubation (yes/no) were used to constitute four distinct groups—that is, patients without transesophageal echocardiography and without long-term intubation, with transesophageal echocardiography and without long-term intubation, without transesophageal echocardiography and with long-term intubation, and with both procedures. Surgical procedures were aggregated into five categories: valve replacement procedures (n = 10), aortocoronary bypass grafts (n = 4), other cardiac operations in adults (n = 3), other cardiac operations in children (n = 2), and operations on the great intrathoracic vessels (n = 3). Group differences in number of abnormalities per patient across these grouping variables were tested with one-way analyses of variance. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered significant.

To explore the co-occurrence pattern among abnormalities, along with the presence or absence of transesophageal echocardiography and long-term intubation, we performed nonmetric multidimensional scaling with these variables. We used the squared Euclidean distance as the dissimilarity measure for these dichotomous data. Multidimensional scaling attempts to find the structure in a set of distance measures between objects (in our study, presence versus absence of abnormalities, transesophageal echocardiography and long-term intubation), which is accomplished by assigning observations to specific locations in a conceptual space (Euclidean and low-dimensional) such that the distances between the spatially arranged points are the best possible fit of the distance scores among them. A badness-of-fit measure (termed "stress") was computed and used to determine the degree of optimality of the dimensional configuration of the input data [17].


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Swallowing abnormalities were seen in 18 (81.8%) of 22 patients (Table 1). A total of 70 abnormalities were found, with a mean of 3.9 abnormalities (range, one to eight abnormalities) per patient. We found abnormalities of the tongue in six patients (27.3%), of the soft palate in one patient (4.5%), of the epiglottis in eight patients (36.4%), of the hyoid and larynx in 13 patients (59.1%), of the pharynx in 10 patients (45.5%), of the upper esophageal sphincter in three patients (13.6%), and of the esophagus in seven patients (31.8%). Aspiration occurred in 13 patients (59.1%): exclusively predeglutitive in one patient (4.5%), intradeglutitive in four patients (18.2%), postdeglutitive in three patients (13.6%), and four different combinations thereof in the five remaining patients. Because of aspiration, assessment of the upper esophageal sphincter and esophagus was not performed in two and nine patients, respectively. Four patients (18.2%) revealed neither functional nor morphologic abnormalities on the videofluoroscopic swallowing study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Distribution of Swallowing Abnormalities in Symptomatic Patients After Cardiovascular Surgery

 

The distribution of abnormalities across the functional units statistically significantly deviated from uniform distribution ({chi}2 = 14.4; df = 6; p = 0.025), with abnormalities of the hyoid and larynx (Fig. 1) and of the pharynx (Fig. 2) being overrepresented and of the soft palate and upper esophageal sphincter (Fig. 3A, 3B) being underrepresented. Group means (± SD) of the number of abnormalities per patient for those without transesophageal echocardiography and without long-term intubation (n = 8), with transesophageal echocardiography and without long-term intubation (n = 4), without transesophageal echocardiography and with longterm intubation (n = 4), and with both transesophageal echocardiography and long-term intubation (n = 6) were, in order, 3.9 (± 2.6), 2.3 (± 1.7), 1.5 (± 1.9), and 4.0 (± 1.7); these group differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.21). Group means (± SD) of the number of abnormalities per patient for those with valve replacement procedures, aortocoronary bypass surgery, other cardiac operations in adults, other cardiac operations in children, and operations on the great intrathoracic vessels were, in order, 3.0 (± 2.2), 4.3 (± 3.3), 3.7 (± 1.5), 0.5 (± 0.7), and 3.7 (± 1.5); these group differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.42).



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. 74-year-old man who underwent repair of thoracic aorta aneurysm, transesophageal echocardiography, and long-term intubation. Videofluoroscopic image obtained in lateral plane shows intradeglutitive aspiration of contrast material into trachea (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. 72-year-old man who underwent replacement of aortic valve, transesophageal echocardiography, and long-term intubation. Videofluoroscopic image obtained in anteroposterior direction shows dilatation of right piriform sinus (large arrowhead) caused by right-sided pharyngeal paresis. Note contrast material in trachea (small arrowheads) resulting from postdeglutitive aspiration due to pharyngeal retention.

 


View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 71-year-old woman who underwent replacement of mitral valve and transesophageal echocardiography. Videofluoroscopic image obtained in lateral plane shows posterior indentation of esophagus due to incomplete opening of upper esophageal sphincter (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 71-year-old woman who underwent replacement of mitral valve and transesophageal echocardiography. Videofluoroscopic image obtained in anteroposterior plane shows bilateral indentation (arrows) of esophagus due to incomplete opening of upper esophageal sphincter.

 

The multidimensional scaling solution—that is, a two-dimensional representation of the associations among swallowing abnormalities, the use of transesophageal echocardiography, and the long-term intubation—satisfactorily represents the higher dimensional associations between the variables investigated because the stress index (Kruskal's stress formula 1) for this solution was rather low (0.19) and R2 (the proportion of variance of the scaled data or disparities that is accounted for by their corresponding distances) was rather high (0.86). Incomplete tilting of the epiglottis (Fig. 4), postdeglutitive aspiration, and pharyngeal weakness were more frequent when either transesophageal echocardiography or long-term intubation or both procedures were performed. Impaired elevation of the hyoid and larynx and predeglutitive aspiration were more frequently seen when only long-term intubation was performed.



View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. 67-year-old man who underwent replacement of mitral valve, transesophageal echocardiography, and long-term intubation. Videofluoroscopic image obtained in lateral plane shows nearly no tilting of epiglottis (large arrowhead). Note intradeglutitive aspiration of contrast material into trachea (arrow) and narrowing of pharyngeal cavity (small arrowheads) caused by pharyngeal constrictors during swallowing.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In this study, we assessed swallowing abnormalities of symptomatic patients who had undergone cardiovascular surgery. Most of these patients were found to have multiple abnormalities that were statistically significantly overrepresented in the functional swallowing units of the hyoid and larynx and the pharynx, represented predominantly in intra- and postdeglutitive aspiration, and underrepresented in the soft palate and upper esophageal sphincter. Although the number of swallowing abnormalities per patient showed no significant differences with regard to the use of transesophageal echocardiography intraoperatively, long-term intubation, or the type of surgical procedure, or transesophageal echocardiography, long-term intubation, or transesophageal echocardiography and long-term intubation were more frequently associated with incomplete tilting of the epiglottis, postdeglutitive aspiration, and pharyngeal weakness. Furthermore, impaired elevation of the hyoid and larynx and predeglutitive aspiration were more often seen if patients underwent only long-term intubation. Thus, we hypothesize that these procedures may influence the type of swallowing abnormalities.

Previous studies have indicated the clinical importance of swallowing abnormalities in patients who had undergone cardiac surgery [2, 3]. Hogue et al. [3] found in their group of 34 patients a reduced oral preparatory phase in 22%, impaired swallowing reflex in 67%, incomplete closure of the epiglottis in 48%, decreased pharyngeal peristalsis in 56%, and aspiration in 90% of patients. In comparison, the results of our study are similar regarding the frequency of abnormalities of the tongue, closure of the epiglottis, and pharyngeal peristalsis. However, the percentage of patients who had aspirated or had an impaired swallowing reflex was considerably lower in our study. Ferraris et al. [2] detected in 31 patients an impaired oral bolus transit in 7%, an impaired pharyngeal transit in 23%, and abnormalities in both oral and pharyngeal transit in 55% of patients. In 55% of their patients, aspiration occurred, which is similar to the percentage identified in our study. Identified differences in study results may relate to differences in entry criteria and examination technique. However, for previous studies, information regarding classification of abnormalities and the detailed examination technique are not available in the literature.

Hogue et al. [3] identified age, duration of intubation, and the use of transesophageal echocardiography as independent predictors of swallowing dysfunctions. Harrington et al. [18] also suggested that postoperative pharyngeal dysfunction may be caused by mechanical trauma from esophageal intubation with an echocardiography probe. In addition, congestive heart failure and non–coronary bypass grafting procedures have been found to be risk factors for development of oropharyngeal dysphagia, whereas patients with remote stroke or diabetes mellitus are at the same risk as patients without these diseases [2]. In general, swallowing abnormalities may result from a variety of neuromuscular and mechanical conditions and inflammatory, anatomic, traumatic, and cancer-related mechanisms [19]. Iatrogenic causes such as insertion of nasogastric feeding tubes, tracheal intubation and tracheostomy, general anesthesia, and treatments for head and neck cancer are also responsible for swallowing abnormalities [19]. Many of these risk factors were present in our patients and may have contributed to their symptoms. After cardiovascular surgery, patients may have a disturbed function of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, which may cause not only dysphonia, but also dysphagia and aspiration due to an incomplete laryngeal closure, pharyngeal weakness or laryngeal closure, and pharyngeal weakness.

In 18% of the patients in our study, videofluoroscopy showed no reason for the patients' symptoms. These findings are in concordance with the results of Ferraris et al. [2], who found that 13% of symptomatic patients have videofluoroscopic swallowing studies without abnormalities. However, in their study, assessment of the upper esophageal sphincter and the esophagus was not performed. Recently, a suprahyoid muscle strengthening exercise program has proven to be effective in restoring oral feeding in some patients with deglutitive failure due to abnormal upper esophageal sphincter opening [5]. Incomplete opening of the upper esophageal sphincter was also detected in two of our patients. Thus, assessment of the entire swallowing phase is recommended to allow the identification of all possible morphologic and functional abnormalities, although this assessment may be difficult in patients with limited mobility.

Videofluoroscopy enables assessment of complex swallowing abnormalities and may facilitate precise planning of an individually tailored functional swallowing therapy. In our experience, the radiologic division of swallowing into functional units serves as an effective method for clinical communication as well as for teaching purposes. Moreover, this division may also have an electrophysiologic correlation. McKeown et al. [20] recently introduced a noninvasive method of monitoring muscle activation during swallowing based on computing of the independent components of the simultaneous superficial electromyographic recordings to detect the underlying functional muscle activations during swallowing. The authors showed that the independent components, each consisting of a unique temporal wave-form and a spatial resolution, provided a means to segregate the complex sequence of muscle activation into rigorously defined separate functional units [20].

Our study was limited by the relatively small sample size. Although cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons at our institution estimate the number of patients with swallowing abnormalities after cardiovascular surgery to be much higher, the number of symptomatic patients who were referred for a videofluoroscopic swallowing study was low. We believe that many symptomatic patients are transferred to rehabilitation facilities after being discharged from the intensive care or intermediate care unit and are subsequently treated elsewhere. Moreover, aspiration that occurs after surgery may go unnoticed (so-called silent aspiration) [18]. Another limitation was the relatively old age of our patients, which may render differentiation between altered swallowing functions because of aging and surgically related functional abnormalities difficult [15, 21, 22]. To define preexistent swallowing abnormalities in this patient group, preoperative evaluation by videofluoroscopy would have been necessary. Although no patient reported a prior history of swallowing abnormalities, we cannot exclude the possibility that some had clinically insignificant episodes of aspiration or other swallowing abnormalities before surgery. In addition, because the time between surgery and videofluoroscopy was relatively long for some patients, a direct causal relationship between the development of swallowing abnormalities and medical procedures is uncertain. To overcome the limitations of this retrospective pilot study, our institution is conducting a large prospective study to evaluate the pre- and postoperative swallowing function in candidates for cardiac surgery, which will allow more reliable exclusion of patients with preexisting swallowing abnormalities, as well as more clearly show the causal relationship between swallowing abnormalities and prior medical procedures.

In conclusion, most of the patients with swallowing problems after cardiovascular surgery present with multiple abnormalities, most commonly affecting the hyoid and larynx and the pharynx and resulting predominantly in intra- or postdeglutitive aspiration. The performance of transesophageal echocardiography and long-term intubation may influence the types of swallowing abnormalities.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Roberts JR, Shyr Y, Christian KR, Drinkwater D, Merrill W. Preemptive gastrointestinal tract management reduces aspiration and respiratory failure after thoracic operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:449 –452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP, Moritz DM, Welch S. Oropharyngeal dysphagia after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1792 –1795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hogue CW Jr, Lappas GD, Creswell LL, et al. Swallowing dysfunction after cardiac operations: associated adverse outcomes and risk factors including intraoperative transeophageal echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:517 –522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Denk DM. Phoniatric aspects of oropharyngeal dysphagia in diagnosis and therapy. HNO 1996;44:339 –353[Medline]
  5. Shaker R, Easterling C, Kern M, et al. Rehabilitation of swallowing by exercise in tube-fed patients with pharyngeal dysphagia secondary to abnormal UES opening. Gastroenterology 2002;122:1314 –1321[Medline]
  6. Levine MS, Rubesin SE. Radiologic investigation of dysphagia. AJR 1990;154:1157 –1163[Free Full Text]
  7. Ekberg O, Pokieser P. Radiologic evaluation of the dysphagic patient. Eur Radiol 1997;7:1285 –1295[Medline]
  8. Nett LM, Morganroth M, Petty TL. Weaning from mechanical ventilation: a perspective and review of techniques. In: Bone RC, ed. Critical care: a comprehensive approach. Park Ridge, IL: American College of Chest Physicians, 1984:171 –188
  9. Eisenhuber E, Schima W, Schober E, et al. Videofluoroscopic assessment of patients with dysphagia: pharyngeal retention is a predictive factor for aspiration. AJR 2002;178:393 –398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Partik B, Pokieser P, Schima W, et al. Videofluoroscopy of swallowing in symptomatic patients who have undergone long-term intubation. AJR 2000;174:1409 –1412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ekberg O. The normal movements of the hyoid bone during swallow. Invest Radiol 1986;21:408 –410[Medline]
  12. Robbins J, Coyle J, Rosenbek J, Roecker E, Wood J. Differentiation of normal and abnormal airway protection during swallowing using the penetrationaspiration scale. Dysphagia 1999;14:228 –232[Medline]
  13. Olsson R, Nilsson H, Ekberg O. Simultaneous videoradiography and computerized pharyngeal manometry: videomanometry. Acta Radiol 1994;35:30 –34[Medline]
  14. Dodds WJ, Stewart ET, Logemann JA. Physiology and radiology of the normal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. AJR 1990;154:953 –963[Free Full Text]
  15. Grishaw EK, Ott DJ, Frederick MG, Gelfand DW, Chen MY. Functional abnormalities of the esophagus: a prospective analysis of radiographic findings relative to age and symptoms. AJR 1996;167:719 –723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Mehta C, Patel N. StatXact 4 for Windows: statistical software for exact nonparametric inference. Cambridge, MA: CYTEL Software, 1999:133 –158
  17. Kruskal JB, Wish M. Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1978
  18. Harrington OB, Duckworth JK, Starnes CL, et al. Silent aspiration after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1599 –1603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Zorowitz RD. Pathophysiology of dysphagia and aspiration. Top Stroke Rehabil 1999;6:1 –16
  20. McKeown MJ, Torpey DC, Gehm WC. Non-invasive monitoring of functionally distinctive muscle activations during swallowing. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:354 –366[Medline]
  21. Ekberg O, Feinberg MJ. Altered swallowing function in elderly patients without dysphagia: radiologic findings in 56 cases. AJR 1991;156:1181 –1184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Frederick MG, Ott DJ, Grishaw EK, Gelfand DW, Chen MY. Functional abnormalities of the pharynx: a prospective analysis of radiographic abnormalities relative to age and symptoms. AJR 1996;166:353 –357[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Partik, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pokieser, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Partik, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pokieser, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS