AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bazot, M.
Right arrow Articles by Daraï, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bazot, M.
Right arrow Articles by Daraï, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 180:1288-1290
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

Imaging of Ovarian Fibromatosis

Marc Bazot1, Christine Salem1, Annie Cortez2, Jean-Marie Antoine3 and Emile Daraï3

1 Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
2 Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75020 Paris, France.
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75020 Paris, France.

Received July 8, 2002; accepted after revision August 29, 2002.

 
Address correspondence to M. Bazot.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Tumorlike ovarian enlargement due to diffuse ovarian fibrosis is referred to as ovarian fibromatosis [1]. Ovarian fibromatosis is a benign disorder that differs from other pelvic fibrotic processes such as desmoid tumors, ovarian fibroma, Brenner tumors, and Krukenberg's tumors. To our knowledge, the radiologic features of ovarian fibromatosis have never been described. We report the imaging features of a case of histologically confirmed ovarian fibromatosis.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
A 25-year-old woman presented with metrorrhagia and menstrual irregularities. Physical findings and the CA 125 serum level were normal. Transabdominal sonography showed well-defined bilateral heterogeneously echogenic masses (Fig. 1A). Transvaginal sonography showed a normal right ovary adjacent to a heterogeneous mass and a left ovarian mass with dense posterior wall attenuation. Doppler sonography revealed little flow in the two masses. The uterus was normal, and a small amount of fluid was seen in the pouch of Douglas. CT showed bilateral solid homogeneous ovarian masses with no fat component. The right and left masses measured 7 and 6 cm, respectively, and were hyperattenuating compared with the adjacent myometrium on unenhanced CT (Fig. 1B). Dynamic and delayed CT showed little enhancement of the masses relative to the adjacent myometrium (Fig. 1C). No hypertrophic lymph nodes were found. Both ovarian masses showed homogeneous low signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted MR images (Figs. 1D and 1E). The right mass infiltrated the posterior border of the ovary, but normal ovarian tissue persisted. In contrast, no normal ovarian tissue was found on the left side. Small cystic structures were observed in both masses. No vessels and no significant uptake of contrast material were noted in either mass during dynamic MR imaging. The tumors showed little enhancement relative to myometrium, and no abnormal peritoneal enhancement was noted on delayed fat-suppressed T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo fast low-angle shot imaging. Free peritoneal fluid was present in the pouch of Douglas.



View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 25-year-old woman who presented with ovarian fibromatosis. Transabdominal sonogram shows bilateral heterogeneously echogenic ovarian masses (asterisks) adjacent to uterus (arrow).

 


View larger version (162K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 25-year-old woman who presented with ovarian fibromatosis. Unenhanced CT scan shows bilateral well-defined solid ovarian masses. Both masses (asterisks) are slightly hyperattenuating relative to adjacent myometrium (arrow). Note small calcification (arrowhead) in left mass.

 


View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 25-year-old woman who presented with ovarian fibromatosis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows poor enhancement of masses relative to adjacent myometrium.

 


View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 25-year-old woman who presented with ovarian fibromatosis. Axial breath-hold T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo fast low-angle shot MR image shows low signal intensity of both ovarian tumors.

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. 25-year-old woman who presented with ovarian fibromatosis. Axial T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR image shows bilateral adnexal masses with low signal intensity. Small cystic structures (arrowheads) are observed in both tumors. Right-sided tumor infiltrates posterior border of ovary (arrow), which is partially intact. Note presence of fluid in pouch of Douglas and air in rectum (asterisk).

 

Surgery consisted of left oophorectomy and partial resection of the right ovary.

The left-sided mass measured 7 cm in diameter; the right-sided mass was composed of three portions measuring 3, 4, and 8 cm. Macroscopically, two distinct patterns were found: a firm well-defined nodular tumor with a dense white fasciculated cut surface, and diffuse infiltration by a white multimicronodular structure with a lobulated margin surrounding multiple microcystic structures (Fig. 1F). Microscopic examination showed proliferation of spindle cells separated by dense collagen. The adjacent ovarian stroma was infiltrated but cystic follicles were spared. Few vessels were present. All the specimens contained focal areas of edema. No lutein or sex-cord cell proliferation was found. The final pathologic diagnosis was ovarian fibromatosis.



View larger version (178K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F. 25-year-old woman who presented with ovarian fibromatosis. Photograph shows pathologic specimen of left ovarian mass. Note firm, well-defined nodular tumor and diffuse infiltration by white multimicronodular structure (arrows) with lobulated margin surrounding multiple microcystic structures (arrowheads).

 

Postoperatively, the patient presented climacteric symptoms related to altered ovarian function and confirmed by an elevated serum level of follicle-stimulating hormone (54 mIU/mL; normal, < 25 mIU/mL). Hormonal replacement therapy was started, but the patient discontinued this treatment after 4 months. Normal menstrual cycles resumed spontaneously. No tumor recurrence has occurred 4 years after surgery.


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Ovarian fibromatosis is a rare benign disorder first described by Young and Scully [1] in young patients (mean age, 25 years) who present with menstrual abnormalities, abdominal and pelvic pain, and occasionally hirsutism or virilization. Ovarian fibromatosis is closely related to massive ovarian edema (residual normal ovarian structures are present) but differs by the presence of abnormal fibrous tissue in the former and edema in the latter. Ovarian fibrous tissue is most often found in neoplastic diseases such as fibromas and Brenner, Krukenberg's, and desmoid tumors. Because of the benign nature of ovarian fibromatosis and its occurrence in young women, correct pretreatment diagnosis is crucial to determine a laparotomic or laparoscopic approach and to allow conservative treatment [1]. After conservative surgery, Young and Scully [1] reported normalization of menses and regression of masculinization, and some patients became pregnant.

Heterogeneously echogenic adnexal masses that show posterior wall attenuation are usually ovarian fibromas, dermoids, or degenerative leiomyomas [2]. Low flow on Doppler sonography and poor enhancement on dynamic and delayed CT are suggestive of ovarian fibromas [3]. In our patient, both masses had homogeneously low signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, although these features can also be seen in ovarian fibromas; fibrothecomas; and Brenner, Krukenberg's, and desmoid tumors [4]. However, Brenner tumors contain extensive amorphous calcifications in more than 80% of their solid portion on CT and MR imaging [5]. Krukenberg's tumors are usually bilateral and have sharp margins and an oval shape [6]; they also usually show strong contrast enhancement on CT and MR imaging [7]. Pelvic desmoid tumors are rare locally invasive, nonmetastasizing neoplasms that typically occur in the second or third decade [8]. Their radiologic features, and particularly their MR imaging signal, may resemble those of ovarian fibromatosis. However, ovarian fibromatosis appears relatively well limited, with no involvement of adjacent pelvic structures. In our patient, the absence of significant enhancement during the parenchymal phase of dynamic MR imaging, and the mild enhancement on delayed MR images, were related to the fibrous component of the masses. T2-weighted MR imaging showed a hypointense signal, corresponding to fibrous infiltration of the right ovary, and remnants of normal ovarian parenchyma, which are unusual in ovarian fibroma. Ovarian fibromas and fibrothecomas occur at all ages, but most frequently during the fifth or sixth decade of life, and are often unilateral and asymptomatic. The occurrence of bilateral ovarian tumors in a young woman with hormonal disturbances is unusual but fibroma cannot be ruled out. However, the combination of a partially intact right ovary, follicle enlargement, and multiple hyperintense foci on T2-weighted MR imaging could be suggestive of ovarian fibromatosis.

In conclusion, ovarian fibromatosis should be considered in women with solid ovarian tumors that have a predominant fibrous component. The presence of ovarian infiltration, with partial sparing of normal ovarian structures, which is particularly visible on MR imaging, can help to distinguish fibromatosis from ovarian fibroma.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Young RH, Scully RE. Fibromatosis and massive edema of the ovary, possibly related entities: a report of 14 cases of fibromatosis and 11 cases of massive edema. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1984;3:153 –178[Medline]
  2. Atri M, Nazarnia S, Bret PM, Aldis AE, Kintzen G, Reinhold C. Endovaginal sonographic appearance of benign ovarian masses. RadioGraphics 1994;14:747 –760; discussion, 761-762[Abstract]
  3. Bazot M, Ghossain MA, Buy JN, et al. Fibrothecomas of the ovary: CT and US findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:754 –759[Medline]
  4. Troiano RN, Lazzarini KM, Scoutt LM, Lange RC, Flynn SD, McCarthy S. Fibroma and fibrothecoma of the ovary: MR imaging findings. Radiology 1997;204:795 –798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Moon WJ, Koh BH, Kim SK, et al. Brenner tumor of the ovary: CT and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:72 –76[Medline]
  6. Ha HK, Baek SY, Kim SH, Kim HH, Chung EC, Yeon KM. Krukenberg's tumor of the ovary: MR imaging features. AJR 1995;164:1435 –1439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kim SH, Kim WH, Park KJ, Lee JK, Kim JS. CT and MR findings of Krukenberg tumors: comparison with primary ovarian tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:393 –398[Medline]
  8. Kawashima A, Goldman SM, Fishman EK, et al. CT of intraabdominal desmoid tumors: is the tumor different in patients with Gardner's disease? AJR 1994;162:339 –342[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bazot, M.
Right arrow Articles by Daraï, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bazot, M.
Right arrow Articles by Daraï, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS