AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerson, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerson, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 180:1477-1478
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Screening breast sonography

Edwin S. Gerson and Wendie A. Berg

Riverdale, GA
University of Maryland Baltimore, MD 21201

Question

When a patient requests a screening breast sonography, what should I tell her?

Answer

Mammography is the only screening test that has been shown to decrease a woman's chances of dying from breast cancer. Where the breast tissue is dense, cancers can be hidden on mammography. Mammography is less able to show cancers in younger women, between 40 and 49 years old, than in women 50 years or older, although mammography is of benefit in both age groups. Sonography shows many cancers not seen on mammography, especially when the tissue is dense. This success has stimulated an interest in using sonography for breast cancer screening. It is not known at this time whether patients with cancers found only on sonography have the same outcome as those with cancers found on mammography or whether treating cancers found only on sonography saves lives. Most of the cancers found only on sonography are small invasive cancers. It is likely that finding such cancers is of benefit, but this has not been proven.

Screening sonography is not performed in women with predominantly fatty breast tissue. It is unlikely that cancer will be found on sonography and not on mammography if the breasts have only minimal scattered densities. It is more likely that a cancer will be found only on sonography if the tissue is mostly dense and if the woman is at high risk of breast cancer. When cancer is present in women 40–49 years old with dense tissue, two studies suggest that the cancer is more likely to be seen on sonography than on mammography [1, 2].

If a woman chooses to have screening breast sonography, she should be aware of several risks. The results of sonography depend on the skill of the individual who performs the examination. Although the results of screening sonography have been encouraging in single-center studies, it is not known that these results will be generally seen. As reviewed separately in this issue [3], additional testing may be required as a result of the screening sonogram. Approximately two to six in 100 women who undergo screening sonography will require a breast aspiration or biopsy as a result of the sonogram. Personnel interpreting breast sonography can easily perform aspiration or biopsy with sonographic guidance if needed. Only approximateley one in 10–11 of such biopsies will show cancer. Even if no aspiration or biopsy is required, in as many as one in 10 women, additional short-interval follow-up sonography (usually in 6 months) may be recommended as a result of the screening sonogram. At this time, screening breast sonography is not a benefit covered by private or public insurers, and the patient will be responsible for the cost of the examination unless the study is performed as part of a clinical trial. The cost of any procedure or follow-up needed as a result of the screening sonogram will be billed to the patient's insurance company, but the patient may be responsible for a copayment.

The patient should continue regular mammography. The earliest type of breast cancer, which is still confined to the ducts of the breast, is usually seen much better on mammography than on sonography. Even if both tests are performed, there is at least a two to four in 100 chance that cancer may still not be detected on imaging [2, 4].

References

  1. Saarenmaa I, Salminen T, Geiger U, et al. The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnosed by mammography and ultrasonography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001;67:117 –123[Medline]
  2. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225:165 –175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Berg WA. Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: ACRIN 6666. AJR 2003:1225 –1228
  4. Moy L, Slanetz PJ, Moore R, et al. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review. Radiology 2002;225:176 –181[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
K. Peldschus, P. Herzog, S. A. Wood, J. I. Cheema, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Computer-Aided Diagnosis as a Second Reader: Spectrum of Findings in CT Studies of the Chest Interpreted as Normal
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1517 - 1523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. S. Gerson and L. L. Fajardo
Screening mammography, sonography of dense fibrocystic breast tissue
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1715 - 1715.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. B. Kopans and W. A. Berg
Breast Sonographic Screening Is Not Ready for Prime Time
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1426 - 1428.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerson, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerson, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS