AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnewolt, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnewolt, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, P. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 180:1731-1735
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Correlation of Contrast-Enhanced Power Doppler Sonography and Conventional Angiography of Abduction-Induced Hip Ischemia in Piglets

Carol E. Barnewolt1, Diego Jaramillo2, George A. Taylor1 and Patricia S. Dunning1

1 Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115.
2 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114.

Received September 13, 2002; accepted after revision November 11, 2002.

 
Address correspondence to G. A. Taylor.

Supported in part by Society for Pediatric Radiology and Alliance Pharmaceutical Corporation, San Diego, CA, NIH grant AR 42396-05.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine if enhanced power Doppler sonography can detect early ischemia of the capital femoral epiphysis induced by hip hyperabduction in piglets and to correlate these findings with angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Proximal femoral perfusion was evaluated in 18 studies of 10 piglet hips with unenhanced power Doppler sonography, enhanced power Doppler sonography with IV contrast agent, and digital angiography, in neutral position, hyperabduction, and after release to neutral position. Enhancement ratios between pixel intensities of power Doppler sonography and enhanced power Doppler images in each position were calculated. Angiograms were analyzed for differences in flow with changes in hip position.

RESULTS. With the piglet in neutral position, power Doppler sonography revealed few vessels in the femoral head. Contrast administration resulted in a temporary marked increase in the visualization of vessels in the femoral head. Quantitative enhanced power Doppler sonography revealed a marked decrease in pixel intensity with abduction (p < 0.001) that was not apparent on unenhanced studies (p = 0.28). The enhancement ratio decreased from 0.45 (mean ± SD, ± 0.26) in neutral position to 0.10 (± 0.21) after abduction; it returned to 0.41 (± 0.14) after release of abduction (p < 0.001 for each comparison). Angiographic studies in hyperabduction revealed a variable level of ischemia.

CONCLUSION. Enhanced power Doppler sonography can be used to visualize the vascular supply to the cartilaginous femoral head in piglets and can detect reversible ischemia induced by hip hyperabduction. These differences correlate with digital angiographic evidence of ischemia.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Ischemia of the growing proximal femoral epiphysis is the major complication of the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip [1]. The decrease in blood flow to the femoral head causes important growth disturbance, which in turn results in deformity and long-term disability. Ischemia appears to be related to the degree of abduction of the hip so that it would seem theoretically possible to determine a "safe" zone in which the hip can remodel without redislocation yet the femoral head perfusion is preserved [2]. Unfortunately, the "safe" zone is variable and cannot be established clinically. Proximal femoral avascular necrosis is usually diagnosed years after the insult has occurred, when the sequelae of abnormal growth become evident clinically or radiographically [3, 4, 5].

MR imaging has been proposed as a modality to evaluate femoral head perfusion [6] and to detect early changes of abduction-related ischemia at a reversible stage [7, 8]. MR imaging may be useful in infants immobilized in spica casts when there is no sonographic window and the risk of avascular necrosis is high, ranging from 20% to 47% [9]. Most infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip however are treated by immobilization with a Pavlik harness when sonographic evaluation is feasible. Although safer, abduction in a Pavlik harness has been associated with avascular necrosis with reported incidences of 2.4%, 5%, 9%, and even 11% [10, 11, 12, 13]. Power Doppler sonography has been advocated to evaluate abduction-related changes of the hip in infants [14].

Unfortunately, visualization of femoral head vascularity with power Doppler sonography is inconsistent and may not provide the detailed information about perfusion necessary to diagnose focal areas of ischemia. Other significant limitations of this technique are that femoral head vascularity is sparse and patient motion often requires diminution in gain and sensitivity to minimize motion artifact.

Enhanced power Doppler sonography has been shown to significantly increase the visualization of blood flow in vascular beds such as the neonatal brain, kidney, and testicle [15]. We have undertaken a study in piglets to explore the feasibility of visualizing cartilaginous femoral head perfusion using enhanced power Doppler sonography, to determine if enhanced power Doppler sonography can detect early reversible ischemia of the capital femoral epiphysis and physis induced by hip hyperabduction in piglets, and to determine whether any detected changes correlate with conventional angiography.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Five newborn piglets (1.4–2.5 kg) were anesthetized with 20 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride (Ketalar, Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ) and 5 mg/kg of xylazine (Rompun, Miles, Shawnee, KS) by intramuscular injection, followed by the administration of 1% isoflurane inhalation anesthesia until venous access could be secured. Thereafter, a continuous IV infusion of diprivan 1% (Propofol, Stuart Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) diluted in 5% dextrose at a dose of 0.002 mg/kg per minute was used for the remainder of the experiment. Polyvinyl catheters were placed by cut down into the external jugular vein for administration of IV fluids and sonographic contrast material, into the internal jugular vein for administration of anesthetic, and into the distal abdominal aorta via the carotid artery for iliac and femoral arteriography.

This study was approved by our institution's animal care and use committee.

Sonographic Evaluation
The contrast agent Imagent (formulation AF0150, Alliance Pharmaceutical, San Diego, CA) was reconstituted according to the manufacturer's directions. A dispersion of surfactant-coated perfluorohexane-nitrogen–containing microbubbles with a median diameter of approximately 5 µm was formed after reconstitution. Elimination from the blood was accomplished by evaporation through the lungs [16]. Contrast material was administered at a dose of 0.2 mL/kg. Each dose was injected IV over a 1- to 2-sec interval. The dose range was determined from previous experiments with this agent [15]. At least 15 min elapsed between injections, and the catheter and stopcock were flushed with saline using three times the volume of the catheter dead space after each dose to clear any residual contrast agent from the delivery system.

In five piglets, serial power Doppler images of each femoral head were obtained in the axial and coronal orientations before and after contrast injection using a 7-MHz linear transducer (128 XP10, Acuson, Mountain View, CA). The piglets were examined in neutral position, then during extreme abduction, and after release to neutral position in a manner similar to that of positioning for angiography. Each position required a separate injection of IV contrast material. As a result, each piglet underwent a total of six contrast injections (three for each hip joint examined).

Imaging parameters were set to standardize the dynamic range of the image using the lowest temporal averaging settings. Doppler power settings were set at their highest level (< 500 mW estimated in situ spatial peak temporal average). Nonlinear image pre- and postprocessing (input–output conversion) curves were not used. Color gain was optimized using the method of Rubin et al. [17] to maximize vascular signal and reduce tissue-motion artifacts. All imaging parameters were set and left unchanged throughout the experiment.

Angiography
Direct arteriography of both common iliac arteries, both superficial and profunda femoris arteries, and their branches was performed using rapid hand injections of nonionic contrast material (Optiray 320, E. M. Parker, Wilmington, MA) with the catheter tip at the bifurcation of the aorta. Anteroposterior images of each hip were obtained in neutral position, during forced hyperabduction, and after release to neutral position in every piglet using a 2-cm field of view on a high-resolution digital fluoroscopy unit (XRE, Littleton, MA). Each piglet underwent six sets of IV contrast injections, three for each hip joint examined.

The imaging sequence was the same in each animal. Each hip was examined by unenhanced power Doppler sonography in three positions and followed by contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography in the same three positions. Digital arteriography was always performed after power Doppler sonography and in a similar sequence of positions.

Image Analysis
Sonographic images were electronically captured using a digital image processing unit (Aegis QV200, Acuson) and saved in an 8-bit TIFF (tagged image file format) format. Images were then transferred onto a Power Macintosh computer (Apple, Cupertino, CA) and analyzed using Adobe Photoshop 4.0 (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA). Serial images obtained in each hip position were saved as separate layers within a Photoshop file. Regions of interest were drawn over each femoral head. Each region of interest was identified on unenhanced images and electronically superimposed on subsequent anatomically registered enhanced images. Thus, the same region of interest size was used for determining mean pixel intensity in each femoral head so that differences in intensity reflected changes in mean pixel value and not variations in the size of the area measured. Number of pixels and mean pixel value for each region of interest were calculated using the program's histogram function. Enhancement ratios (ER) over each femoral head were calculated using the following formula based on the ratio of mean pixel intensities (MPI):

ER = enhanced MPI – unenhanced MPI.

Unenhanced Mean Pixel Intensity
Digital arteriograms for each hip were graded for presence and degree of vascular obstruction (occlusion or attenuation) of the profunda femoris and circumflex arteries during forced abduction and again for reconstitution of flow after release of the hip back to neutral position. Vascular occlusion was defined as a sharp cutoff of the profunda femoris artery and nonvisualization of the circumflex arteries. Vascular attenuation was defined as a narrowed caliber of the profunda femoris and circumflex arteries with diminished contrast opacification of the circumflex arteries. Image grading was performed by consensus of three radiologists, who were not blinded to the results of the power Doppler examinations.

Statistical Analysis
Differences between enhanced and unenhanced mean pixel intensities, and differences in enhancement ratio with changes in hip position were analyzed using analysis of variance.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
With the hip held in neutral position, power Doppler sonography alone revealed only a few vessels in the cartilaginous portion of the femoral head (Fig. 1A). Contrast administration resulted in a temporary marked increase in the density of visualized vessels in the femoral head (Fig. 1B). With forced hyperabduction, there was a decrease in visualized vessels of the femoral epiphysis with power Doppler sonography alone (Fig. 1C). The difference was more obvious with enhanced power Doppler sonography (Fig. 1D).



View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. Coronal power Doppler sonograms of same piglet hip. M = femoral metaphysis. Unenhanced power Doppler image obtained in neutral position shows little flow in cartilaginous femoral head (arrowheads).

 


View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. Coronal power Doppler sonograms of same piglet hip. M = femoral metaphysis. Enhanced power Doppler image obtained in neutral position shows improved conspicuity of vessels in cartilaginous femoral head (arrowheads).

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. Coronal power Doppler sonograms of same piglet hip. M = femoral metaphysis. Unenhanced power Doppler image obtained during forced hyperabduction shows absent flow in femoral head (arrowheads).

 


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. Coronal power Doppler sonograms of same piglet hip. M = femoral metaphysis. Enhanced power Doppler image obtained during forced hyperabduction shows qualitative decrease in power Doppler signal in cartilaginous femoral head (arrowheads).

 

The differences in mean pixel intensities are shown in bar graph form in Figures 2A, 2B. On unenhanced images, mean pixel intensities were similar in neutral position (mean ± SD, 69.92 ± 21), abduction (72.58 ± 25) and release (71.54 ± 23, p = 0.28). In comparison, mean pixel intensities on enhanced images during forced abduction were significantly lower than those in neutral position (78.96 ± 5 vs 99.49 ± 15, respectively, p < 0.001). The enhancement ratio decreased from 0.45 (± 0.26) in neutral position to 0.10 (± 0.21) after abduction; it returned to 0.41 (± 0.14) after release to neutral position. The difference between enhancement ratios in neutral position and abduction is statistically significant (p < 0.001), as is the difference between enhancement ratios in abduction and release back to neutral position (p < 0.001).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. Bar graphs represent mean pixel intensity in neutral position, forced hyperabduction, and release back to neutral position. Graph shows that changes in mean pixel intensity on unenhanced power Doppler sonograms are not significantly different in three hip positions (p = 0.28).

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. Bar graphs represent mean pixel intensity in neutral position, forced hyperabduction, and release back to neutral position. Graph shows that mean pixel intensity on enhanced power Doppler sonograms is significantly lower during forced hyperabduction compared with neutral position (p < 0.001).

 

The apparent decrease in blood flow to the capital femoral epiphysis with forced hyperabduction was also visualized on digital angiography. A variable level of ischemia was seen, ranging from occlusion of the profunda femoris artery (seven hips, Figs. 3A, 3B) to attenuation of flow in the branches of the medial circumflex artery (four hips).



View larger version (212K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. Digital angiographic images of piglet hip. Angiogram obtained in neutral position shows contrast opacification of left femoral artery (f), profunda femoris artery (p), and medial circumflex artery (arrow).

 


View larger version (208K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. Digital angiographic images of piglet hip. Digital angiographic image of same piglet obtained with hips held in forced hyperabduction shows complete occlusion of left profunda femoris artery (arrow).

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The current treatment of infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip consists of hip immobilization in a flexed and abducted position. Hip immobilization devices include the Pavlik harness for less severe dysplasia and a spica cast for more severe dysplasia. Avascular necrosis has never been reported in infants with untreated developmental dysplasia of the hip but is a real risk after treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip of between 2.4% and 11% for the Pavlik harness [10, 11, 12, 13] and 26–47% for spica casts [18, 19, 20]. Piglet studies have shown that extreme flexion–abduction interferes with blood flow to the femoral head [21]. It seems likely then that fixed, extreme flexion–abduction during treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in some infants leads to femoral head ischemia and subsequent avascular necrosis. In fact, a strong association exists between increasing angles of abduction as measured on postreduction CT and subsequent development of avascular necrosis [9]. It is desirable to determine an angle of abduction that is high enough to treat the dysplasia yet low enough to avoid the complication of hip avascular necrosis. This angle is the so-called safe zone coined by Ramsey et al. [2].

It would be optimal to have the ability to show preservation of femoral head vascularization and femoral head position while the hip was in an immobilization device. Gray-scale sonography has long been used to show femoral head position in infants wearing the Pavlik harness, and power Doppler sonography has shown some promise as a method to show changes in femoral head vascularity with abduction [14]. However, practical limitations to power Doppler sonography of the infant hip include the inherently sparse femoral head vascularity and the resultant inconsistency of vascular visualization. This limitation is accentuated by infant motion.

Although our study is limited by a small number of experimental animals and the need for repeated IV injections of the sonographic contrast agent, it suggests that enhanced power Doppler sonography allows visualization of more vessels in the cartilaginous femoral head so that changes induced by hip position become more conspicuous. Our data suggest that abduction-induced changes in femoral head vascularity seen with power Doppler sonography were appreciable only with the addition of contrast material. Enhanced power Doppler sonography may be useful in the monitoring of therapy in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip, specifically in ensuring the presence of flow within the cartilaginous femoral head in hopes of avoiding the late complication of hip avascular necrosis. Additional clinical studies are needed to determine the utility of this technique in infants.

In summary, enhanced power Doppler sonography allows conspicuous visualization of vessels in the cartilaginous femoral head in piglets and can detect reversible ischemia induced by hip hyperabduction. These differences correlate with digital angiographic depiction of attenuation in hip vascularity.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Weinstein SL. Developmental hip dysplasia and dislocation. In: Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL, eds. Pediatric orthopedics, vol. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996: 903–950
  2. Ramsey PL, Lasser S, MacEwen GD. Congenital dislocation of the hip: use of the Pavlik harness in the child during the first 6 months of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:1000 –1004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kalamchi A, MacEwen GD. Avascular necrosis following treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:876 –888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Keret D, MacEwen GD. Growth disturbance of the proximal part of the femur after treatment for congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:410 –423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. O'Brien T, Millis MB, Griffin PP. The early identification and classification of growth disturbances of the proximal end of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:970 –980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Barnewolt CE, Shapiro F, Jaramillo D. Normal gadolinium-enhanced MR images of the developing appendicular skeleton. I. Cartilaginous epiphysis and physis. AJR 1997;169:183 –189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Jaramillo D, Villegas-Medina O, Doty D, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging demonstrates abduction-caused hip ischemia and its reversal in piglets. AJR 1996;166:879 –887[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Jaramillo D, Villegas-Medina O, Laor T, Shapiro F, Millis MB. Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of pediatric patients after reduction of dysplastic hips: assessment of femoral head position, factors impeding reduction, and femoral head ischemia. AJR 1998;170:1633 –1637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Smith BD, Millis MB, Hey LA, Jaramillo D, Kasser JR. Post-reduction computed tomography in developmental dislocation of the hip. II. Predictive value of outcome. J Pediatr Orthop 1997; 17:631 –636[Medline]
  10. Grill F, Bensahel H, Canadell J, Dungl P, Matasovic T, Vizkelety T. The Pavlik harness in the treatment of congenital dislocating hip: report on a multicenter study of the European Pediatric Orthopaedic Society. J Pediatr Orthop 1988;8:1 –8[Medline]
  11. Iwasaki K. Management after application of the Pavlik harness in congenital dislocation of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1987;106:276 –280
  12. Tonnis D. Ischemic necrosis as a complication of treatment of CDH [in French]. Acta Orthop Belg 1990;56:195 –206[Medline]
  13. Touzet P, Chaumien JP, Rigault P, Padovani JP. Le harnais de Pavlik dans la luxation congenitale de hanche avant un an. Acta Orthop Belg 1990;56:141 –147[Medline]
  14. Bearcroft P, Berman L, Robinson A, Butler G. Vascularity of the neonatal femoral head: in vivo demonstration with Power Doppler US. Radiology 1996;200:209 –211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Taylor GA, Ecklund K, Dunning PS. Renal cortical perfusion in rabbits: visualization with color amplitude imaging and an experimental microbubble-based US contrast agent. Radiology 1996;201:125 –129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Goldberg BB, Liu-J-B, Forsberg F. Ultrasound contrast agents: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994;20:319 –333[Medline]
  17. Rubin JM, Bude RO, Carson PL, Bree RL, Adler RS. Power Doppler: a potentially useful alternative to mean-frequency based color Doppler sonography. Radiology 1994;190:853 –856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Brougham DI, Broughton NS, Cole WG, Menelaus MB. Avascular necrosis following closed reduction of congenital dislocation of the hip: review of influencing factors and long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:557 –562
  19. Forlin E, Choi IH, Guille JT, Bowen JR, Glutting J. Prognostic factors in congenital dislocation of the hip treated with closed reduction: the importance of arthrographic evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:1140 –1152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Borges JL, Kumar SJ, Guille JT. Congenital dislocation of the hip in boys. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:975 –984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Salter RB. Role of innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip in the older child. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1966;48:1413 –1439[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnewolt, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnewolt, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, P. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS