AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bosniak, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bosniak, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 181:627-633
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Follow-Up CT of Moderately Complex Cystic Lesions of the Kidney (Bosniak Category IIF)

Gary M. Israel1 and Morton A. Bosniak

1 Both authors: NYU Medical Center, Ste. HW 202, 560 First Ave., New York, NY 10016.

Received January 24, 2003; accepted after revision March 28, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to G. M. Israel (gary.israel{at}med.nyu.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to show the use of follow-up CT studies in the management of moderately complex cystic lesions of the kidney (Bosniak category IIF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The CT scans of 42 moderately complex cystic renal masses (Bosniak category IIF) with follow-up examinations for 2 years or greater or with pathology correlation (n = 3) were retrospectively analyzed by the authors in consensus. The complexity of each lesion was assessed on the basis of the number and appearance of the septa, wall thickness, interface with the kidney parenchyma, presence and amount of calcification, and contrast enhancement characteristics. Lesion size was measured in two dimensions. Follow-up examinations were evaluated for any interval change.

RESULTS. The average size of the lesions was 3.9 x 3.6 cm, and the average follow-up time was 5.8 years (range, 2 years-18 years 4 months; median, 5.0 years). Eighteen lesions had fewer than five septa, 16 lesions had between five and nine septa, and eight lesions had more than nine septa. In 39 lesions, the wall or septa or both were slightly thickened, and in a single lesion, the wall and septa were hairline thin. The two remaining lesions were of uniformly high attenuation and completely intrarenal. Forty-one lesions had a sharp interface with the kidney, whereas one had an indistinct interface. Twenty lesions contained calcium. Enhancement was not shown in any lesions except for minimal enhancement of smooth walls or septa of some lesions. Follow-up examinations showed that three lesions had developed more calcification, one lesion had increased in overall size but appeared less complex, and three lesions had decreased in size. In addition, two lesions had become more complex and developed thicker septa, and these lesions proved to be cystic neoplasms.

CONCLUSION. Follow-up CT studies are an effective way of managing patients with moderately complex cystic lesions of the kidney (Bosniak category IIF) because the absence of change supports benignity and progression indicates neoplasm.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Differentiating complex cystic lesions of the kidneys that need surgical intervention from those that do not remains a difficult and common diagnostic problem. Some cysts are mildly complex but can easily be diagnosed as benign. They have thin walls and can contain a few hairline-thin septa, which may contain a thin calcification or a short segment of minimally thickened and smooth calcification (Bosniak category II) [1]. Other cysts—those that are very complex and have contrast-enhancing thickened irregular walls or septa—usually require surgical exploration and removal, although some will be benign (Bosniak category III).

There is a group of cystic lesions that are not complex enough to be characterized as category III but that are more complex than category II lesions. These cysts, referred to as category IIF (F for follow-up), are thought to likely be benign but because of their complexity require follow-up studies to prove their benignity [2-5]. They may contain an increased number of septa or have minimal thickening of the wall or septa, and whether there is measurable enhancement of these structures is often uncertain. These lesions do not need surgical exploration, as would a more complex category III lesion, because they are thought to be benign. They can be managed with follow-up examinations to show their stability over time, thereby proving their benignity and saving the patient from undergoing an unnecessary surgical intervention. The purpose of this study is to show the use of follow-up CT studies in the management of these moderately complex cystic lesions of the kidney (Bosniak category IIF).


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients and Imaging
The CT scans of all cases of Bosniak category IIF cysts evaluated at our institution for which follow-up examinations of 2 years or greater were available were analyzed. For inclusion in this group of cases, the cystic lesion was more complex than a category II lesion but less complex than a category III lesion, and it had been characterized as a category IIF lesion (Appendix 1) at the time of the initial interpretation of the case. Completely intrarenal high-attenuation cystic lesions (higher attenuation of the unenhanced surrounding renal parenchyma) that measured 3 cm or greater were also included. Our search yielded 42 masses in 41 patients. In 34 cases (33 patients), the examinations were performed at our institution. Imaging in the remaining eight cases (eight patients) was performed at outside institutions, and the CT scans were sent to one of the authors for consultation and follow-up.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
APPENDIX 1. The Bosniak Renal Cyst Classification System

 

The study group consisted of 25 men and 16 women with an average age of 57.8 years (range, 30-86 years). We attempted to obtain all subsequent CT examinations for each patient to ensure the longest possible follow-up interval. Pathologic correlation was available in three patients who underwent surgery after the follow-up studies. This study was approved by the institutional board of research associates at our institution.

Because our study was retrospective and the cases were collected over approximately 10 years, the examinations were performed on a variety of helical and conventional CT scanners using different slice collimations (range, 3-10 mm). In addition, the type and amount of IV contrast material also varied. However, all examinations were performed before and after IV contrast administration.

Image Analysis
Each case was retrospectively analyzed by the authors in consensus. The complexity of each lesion was assessed on the basis of the number and appearance of the septa, wall thickness, interface with the kidney parenchyma, presence and amount of calcification, and contrast enhancement characteristics. The diameter of each lesion was measured in two dimensions using handheld calipers. The follow-up examinations were analyzed for any interval change.

The number of septa in each lesion was determined, and each lesion was placed in one of three categories: fewer than five septa, between five and nine septa, and more than nine septa. In addition, the thicknesses of the septa and the wall of each lesion were subjectively determined to be either hairline thin or slightly thickened. If either a single septum or the wall of a lesion was determined to be slightly thickened, this finding was recorded as a slightly thickened septum or wall for the entire lesion. The interface of the lesion with the surrounding renal parenchyma was determined to be either sharp or indistinct. Contrast enhancement was evaluated using multiple region-of-interest measurements performed at the time of each examination.

For the lesions that contained calcium (17 calcified lesions were reported as part of a previous study [6]), a subjective scoring system of 1-4 was used. A score of 1 was given for minimal calcification, which was defined as hairline-thin smooth strands of calcium. A score of 2 was given for mild calcification, which indicated some thickness and minimal nodularity of the calcification. A score of 3 denoted moderate calcification, which was defined as further thickness of the calcification or grossly nodular calcification (or both). A score of 4 represented grossly thickened, nodular, and extensive calcification.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The average size of the lesions was 3.9 x 3.6 cm, and the average follow-up time was 5.8 years (range, 2 years-18 years 4 months; median, 5.0 years). Eighteen lesions had fewer than five septa, 16 lesions had between five and nine septa, and eight lesions had more than nine septa. In 39 lesions, the wall or septa or both were slightly thickened (Figs. 1, 2, 3), whereas in a single lesion, which contained more than nine septa, the wall and septa were hairline thin. The two remaining lesions were of uniformly high attenuation and were completely intrarenal. Forty-one lesions had a sharp interface with the surrounding renal parenchyma. One high-attenuation intrarenal cyst had an indistinct interface with the kidney (Fig. 4). Contrast enhancement was not shown in any lesions except minimal enhancement seen in smooth thin septa or in the walls of some lesions; this finding contributed to their complexity.



View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. 66-year-old man with moderately complex category IIF cyst in right kidney. Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows 2-cm cystic mass in right kidney that has mildly thickened wall (arrow). Septa are noted within lesion. Follow-up examinations (not shown) performed up to 3 years later revealed no change in this lesion. Note simple cyst in posterior right kidney with thin imperceptible wall.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. 56-year-old man with moderately complex category IIF cyst in left kidney. Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows 3-cm complex cystic mass in left kidney. Wall of lesion (straight arrow) is slightly thickened, and few hairline-thin septations (curved arrow) are present. Follow-up examinations (not shown) performed up to 6 years 6 months later showed no change in appearance of this lesion.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. 86-year-old man with complex cystic category IIF mass in left kidney. Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows 4-cm complex cystic mass in left kidney that has thickened wall (long straight arrow) containing small amount of calcification (short straight arrow) (calcification score = 1). Also notice thin septation (curved arrow). Follow-up examinations (not shown) performed up to 2 years later revealed no change in lesion.

 


View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. 45-year-old woman with intrarenal high-attenuation cyst (category IIF). Axial unenhanced CT scan shows 3-cm intrarenal high-density cyst that has slightly indistinct posterior interface (arrow) with kidney. Patient also underwent contrast-enhanced examination (not shown), and multiple region-of-interest measurements were performed and showed no evidence of enhancement in any part of lesion. This lesion was stable at follow-up examinations performed up to 3 years 6 months later.

 

Twenty lesions contained calcium with an average calcification score of 2.7 (Fig. 5). At initial presentation, the calcification score of each lesion was as follows: a calcification score of 1 in two lesions, a calcification score of 2 in five lesions, a calcification score of 3 in 10 lesions, and a calcification score of 4 in three lesions. Three lesions were shown to have developed more calcification on follow-up examinations, two of which increased by one calcification score over an average of 6.8 years (range, 6 years 6 months-7 years). One of these two lesions was pathologically proven to be a benign multilocular cyst, and the patient underwent surgery at the discretion of the referring physician. The third lesion increased by two calcification scores over 18 years 4 months.



View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. 68-year-old man with calcified cystic renal mass (category IIF). Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows 1.5-cm complex cystic mass that has thick and nodular calcified wall (calcification score = 3), but no evidence of soft-tissue enhancement is present. Follow-up examinations (not shown) through 5 years revealed no change in mass or amount of calcification.

 

Follow-up examinations showed that three lesions had decreased in diameter (range, 1-3 cm; average, 1.8 cm), and two lesions had grown. The first of these two lesions, which increased from 2 to 2.5 cm over 4 years 7 months, initially contained septa that were slightly thickened (Figs. 6A, and 6B). On the follow-up examinations, the septa were less apparent and the lesion appeared less complex. The second lesion that had grown was a case from an outside institution which was sent to one of the authors for consultation. Initially, a 2-cm moderately complex cystic mass was identified. Follow-up examinations were recommended and were performed at the outside institution. A 1-year follow-up examination showed no change in the lesion. The next follow-up examination was performed 2 years later (3 years after the initial examination), and it showed that the lesion had grown to 4 cm and that the septa had become thicker and nodular. This lesion proved to be a cystic renal cell carcinoma. One final lesion that had not increased in size over a follow-up period of 1 year 4 months had become more complex and developed thicker septa; this lesion proved to be a cystic neoplasm (Figs. 7A, and 7B). This lesion was included in our series because it was originally interpreted as category IIF, even though it could be consistent with a category III lesion.



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A. 30-year-old man with category IIF mass in left kidney. Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows 2-cm cystic mass contains mildly thickened septation (arrow).

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B. 30-year-old man with category IIF mass in left kidney. Follow-up contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained 4 years 7 months after A shows that mass has grown to 2.5 cm. However, septation is no longer visible, and lesion appears less complex.

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A. 65-year-old man with complex category IIF cystic mass in right kidney. Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows 3-cm complex cystic mass in right kidney that has moderately thickened septation (arrow). Although this lesion was originally classified as category IIF, irregular thickening of septum (arrow) is visible posteriorly; this finding suggests that category III might have been more appropriate category for this lesion than category IIF.

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B. 65-year-old man with complex category IIF cystic mass in right kidney. Follow-up contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained 1 year 4 months after A shows that septa and wall have become thicker and lesion is more complex. These findings indicate its malignant nature. This lesion proved to be cystic renal cell carcinoma. Two-year follow-up examination (not shown) performed after surgery revealed no evidence of recurrent disease.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Renal cysts are common benign lesions and are often an incidental finding during abdominal CT. When they are of fluid attenuation, lack internal architecture, have thin walls, and show no evidence of enhancement after IV contrast administration, they can easily be dismissed as benign. However, the appearance of mild and moderately complex renal cysts varies, which can create difficulty in diagnosis and management. The Bosniak classification of renal cysts introduced in 1986 has proven to be a useful tool in helping to evaluate these lesions and decide clinical management [1]. This classification system has been accepted worldwide as a way of assessing renal lesions, and although interobserver variation occurs in some cases, there is a general agreement in most instances [7-11].

Category I (simple cysts) and category II (mildly complex cysts) lesions (Appendix 1) are considered benign and do not require treatment. Their diagnosis and differentiation are usually straightforward and without difficulty or disagreement between observers. The differentiation of category III and IV lesions can occasionally cause difficulty but is not essential because both require surgery, although the surgical approach may be different. However, differentiating more complex category II lesions (nonsurgical) from some less complex category III lesions (surgical) is important because their recommended management is different, and these cases cause the most difficulty in diagnosis and the most interobserver variation [11].

In 1993, Bosniak revised the original classification system [2] to include a subset of category II lesions, category IIF lesions ("F" for follow-up) [5]. These lesions do not fall neatly into category II because they are more complex. They do not require surgical exploration because they are thought to be benign, but they do require follow-up examinations to prove they are benign by showing no substantial change in appearance. Category IIF lesions may contain increased numbers of thin septa or a slightly thickened but smooth septum or wall. They may also contain calcification that may be thick and nodular, but they do not contain any associated enhancing soft-tissue elements [6]. Completely intrarenal high-attenuation cysts 3 cm or larger fall into this group (category IIF) as well (Appendix 1).

Unfortunately, quantifying the number of hairline-thin septa that would upgrade a lesion from category II to category IIF is not possible. This number depends on many factors including the size of the lesion. For example, a 10-cm thin-walled cystic lesion containing a few hairline-thin septa would not be a worrisome finding and would be placed in category II. However, a 4-cm thin-walled cystic lesion containing the same number of hairline-thin septa would appear more complex. In this smaller lesion, the septa would be closer to each other and have less surrounding fluid, giving the lesion a more troublesome appearance. In this situation, the smaller lesion might warrant a follow-up examination and might be placed in category IIF, whereas the larger lesion might not. The 24 lesions in this cohort that contained more than five septa had an average size of 4.4 x 4.7 cm. Furthermore, 23 of these lesions also contained a slightly thickened septum or wall. In only a single 8-cm lesion, which contained more than nine septa, were all septa hairline thin.

Quantifying the thickness of the septa or wall that would place a lesion in category IIF is also not possible. However, any thickness to the septum or wall that is greater than hairline thin would upgrade a lesion from category II to category IIF. In our series, 39 of the 42 lesions contained either a septum or wall that was slightly thicker than hairline thin. It is this slight thickening that requires that these lesions be studied further. However, the septal or wall thickening that may occur in category IIF lesions is mild and smooth and is not the gross irregular wall or septal thickening present in category III lesions.

In some cases, a cluster of small simple cysts may superficially appear as a large, more complex lesion. The walls of these small cysts lie adjacent to each other, giving the appearance of slightly thickened septations in a large mass. Often, a small portion of normal renal parenchyma may insinuate itself between cysts, mimicking enhancing soft tissue in the wall of the lesion. In this instance, it is important to verify that the tissue between the cysts enhances identically to the renal parenchyma and does not exhibit enhancement characteristics typical of abnormal tissue associated with a cystic neoplasm. In recent cases and with the advent of multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners, we find that scrolling through thin-section images in succession on a workstation helps establish the relationship of the cysts to each other and to the renal parenchyma that has been incorporated between the cysts. As more studies are performed with MDCT scanners, this technique may prove helpful in evaluating some of these cases.

Differentiating a complex benign multilocular cyst from a multiloculated cystic neoplasm is usually impossible with imaging studies. These lesions appear as category III lesions and will be removed. However, there does exist a small percentage of less complex multiloculated cystic neoplasms that can appear as category IIF lesions. Nevertheless, these lesions will appear more complex on follow-up examinations, and their true nature will become apparent. This scenario occurred in two cases in our series. In one of these cases, which is shown in Figures 7A, and 7B, one could argue that the initial interpretation of category IIF was faulty and that, in fact, the lesion should have been placed in category III initially. However, the follow-up examination did clearly indicate increased septal and wall thickening, and its malignant nature became obvious. In the second case, the malignant nature of the lesion also became apparent on the follow-up examination, which showed a gross soft-tissue thickening in a previously moderately complex cyst.

Calcification is common in cystic lesions of the kidneys and can be seen in both benign and malignant lesions [12]. Hairline-thin calcification or a short segment of slightly thickened but smooth calcification may be present in the septum or wall of minimally complex renal cysts (category II), whereas either large or small amounts of calcification may be present in more complex lesions (categories IIF, III, and IV). Category IIF renal cysts may contain irregular, thick, and nodular calcification as long as no associated enhancing soft-tissue components are present [6]. Furthermore, the amount of calcification can increase over time without indicating malignancy. This finding occurred in three of the 20 calcified lesions in this series. However, if the septum or wall becomes thicker or irregular with any sign of an increase in the soft-tissue component, the lesion should be considered category III (or IV) and approached surgically.

Hyperdense (or high-attenuation) renal cysts are difficult cystic lesions to evaluate: the thickness of the wall or the internal composition of the lesion cannot be assessed because the homogeneous high-attenuation fluid inside the lesion masks these structures. Therefore, the major diagnostic criterion used in evaluating these cysts is the presence or absence of enhancement. The highest quality examination needs to be performed when characterizing these masses, and numerous region-of-interest measurements need to be obtained from all parts of the lesion on the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced examinations to ensure that there are no enhancing components. Hyperdense cysts are commonly seen. When they measure less than 3 cm, are round and sharply marginated with at least one quarter of the lesion extending outside the renal parenchyma, and most importantly do not enhance, a diagnosis of a benign hyperdense cyst (category II) can be made. These criteria and this approach have been accepted by most radiologists and are used in general practice. However, when hyperdense cysts are completely intrarenal and measure 3 cm or larger, the diagnosis of a benign lesion cannot be made with as much confidence. In this case, a portion of the lesion does not extend outside the renal parenchyma, so the morphology and smoothness of the wall cannot be accessed. These lesions may appear to have a slightly indistinct interface with the surrounding renal parenchyma (as did one of the two intrarenal high-density lesions in this series). They must be considered category IIF, and follow-up examinations need to be performed to show their stability over time. Alternatively, MRI may prove helpful in the characterization of these troublesome lesions and may possibly avoid the need for follow-up examinations in these cases [13].

When a complex cystic lesion considered to be category IIF is encountered, the radiologist must be certain that the referring physician clearly understands that the lesion in question is likely benign but that it does have some worrisome features and that follow-up examinations are necessary to prove stability and, therefore, benignity. Some patients, particularly those who are young, may not want to use a follow-up approach and may want surgical intervention for a definitive immediate diagnosis. However, if the follow-up approach is taken, we recommend the first follow-up examination occur 6 months after the initial examination. If the lesion is unchanged, additional follow-up examinations should be performed at yearly intervals for at least 5 years, although the optimal follow-up period has not yet been determined. The length of follow-up depends on a number of factors including the patient's age as well as the size and complexity of the lesion. In general, we think that a 5-year follow-up period in patients older than 50-60 years is adequate to show that a complex cystic lesion is stable. However, in younger patients, a longer follow-up period may be necessary. Many patients (and physicians) do not want additional follow-up studies to continue after 3 years (which may be adequate in less complex category IIF lesions). This follow-up protocol should be used to follow up these patients when possible. Obviously, further experience is necessary to come to a definitive conclusion regarding the proper interval and length of follow-up necessary in these cases. In this series, many patients had long-term follow-up examinations. These examinations were performed either because the patient or the physician requested them or, more often, because the patient was imaged for a different reason and those examinations became available for comparison. Longer follow-up periods may be appropriate in the more complex category IIF lesions and in young patients because no data that describe long-term follow-up of these cystic lesions are available.

In general, we prefer to perform CT studies initially as the follow-up examination. This examination allows a precise and direct comparison of the thickness of the septa and wall of the lesion. MRI can be performed for follow-up, particularly in young patients, to reduce radiation exposure or in patients with renal insufficiency. Although CT and MRI examinations are often compatible in terms of assessing cystic renal lesions, at times they are not equivalent. In our experience, septa are more prominent and obvious on MRI studies, so comparing a CT scan with a subsequent MRI study may be difficult.

If a lesion grows slightly, this change should not be perceived as troublesome because even benign simple cysts grow. If the septa and wall of the lesion are unchanged, this finding supports benignity and continued follow-up is recommended. However, if an increase in the thickness or in the irregularity of the wall or septa is seen, surgical exploration is necessary because either finding indicates malignancy. In this series, only two of the 42 lesions were shown to have increased in size at the follow-up examination. One lesion grew from 2 to 2.5 cm over 4 years 7 months, became less complex, and was thought to be benign. The second lesion increased from 2 to 4 cm over 3 years and developed thicker and more complex septa; a cystic neoplasm was ultimately diagnosed at pathology. This case illustrates the value and importance of the follow-up approach to the management of these cases, in which a lesion initially thought to most likely be benign (even though complex) is shown to be a surgical lesion (most likely malignant) on a follow-up examination. It also shows that if this strategy is used, the follow-up studies must be performed on a timely basis.

One might argue that all category IIF lesions should be surgically removed. That assertion may be true in some young patients or in those uncomfortable with the follow-up approach, but this strategy does not seem appropriate for the general population. Because only two of the 42 category IIF lesions in our series were found to be malignant, a surgical approach does not seem justified. These malignant cystic lesions may represent a low-grade variant of renal cell carcinoma [14]. They are associated with a better prognosis than other renal malignancies [15] and have less tendency to metastasize [14-16]; in fact, some have "at most low malignant potential" [16]. Therefore, in those few cases in which a diagnosis of malignancy is delayed until follow-up examinations reveal the true nature of the lesion, the welfare of the patient does not appear to be compromised.

We recognize several limitations of this study. The cases in this series were reanalyzed in consensus, so interobserver variability could not be evaluated. Because the study lesions were complex, placement of some into category IIF might not be accepted by all radiologists and is open to a difference of opinion. Some of the category IIF lesions included in this group might well be considered category III by some observers. In general, we believe that if the complexity of a category II lesion is in question, the lesion should be placed in category IIF and followed up. Likewise, if there is a question as to whether a lesion belongs in category IIF or category III, the lesion should be placed in category III. Intervention could then be influenced by clinical parameters such as the patient's age and physical condition. Although the Bosniak classification system is based only on imaging findings, the incorporation of clinical parameters may lead to variability in the management of some cases.

Another limitation of the study is that the examinations were retrospectively collected. This factor introduces a case selection bias and our cohort is not all-inclusive. Also, some patients with a category IIF lesion were lost to follow-up because they relocated, changed physicians or hospitals, or did not heed the advice to undergo further follow-up. Next, the CT protocol was not standardized across all cases, although all examinations were performed before and after IV contrast administration.

Pathologic proof is available in three of the 42 cases. Because category IIF lesions are not usually surgically removed, follow-up studies need to be performed to document their stability and thereby confirm their benignity. As we discussed previously, the length of follow-up to prove benignity has not been established. However, on the basis of our experience gathered with this case material, we believe a lesion that is stable over a 5-year period certainly implies benignity. Because cystic lesions of the kidney have a slow growth pattern, longer follow-up periods may be prudent. This more cautious approach is especially prudent for more complex lesions, patients with multiple complex lesions, and young patients. The average follow-up in our series is 5.8 years. We included many cases with prolonged follow-up, not because we believe that follow-up for more than 5 years was needed in many of the cases, but because the data were available. These cases support the contention that follow-up of more than 5 years is not generally necessary. Finally, the sample size is relatively small, and additional studies with increased numbers of patients and longer follow-up would be of value.

In summary, differentiating complex cystic renal masses that require surgical intervention from those that do not remains a difficult and common problem. Evaluation of the number and appearance of the septa, wall thickness, interface with the kidney parenchyma, presence of calcification, and contrast enhancement characteristics of a lesion determines its nature and ultimate management. For patients with moderately complex cystic lesions of the kidney that fall into the Bosniak category IIF group, follow-up examinations have proven to be an effective management strategy. The stability of these lesions over time supports benignity and avoids unnecessary surgical intervention from being performed, whereas progression indicates neoplasm. However, if a complex cystic lesion is placed in category IIF, follow-up studies must be performed as outlined in this article to ensure that the lesion is benign and a nonsurgical approach is justified.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology1986; 158:1 -10[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bosniak MA. Difficulties in classifying cystic lesion of the kidney. Urol Radiol1991; 13:91 -93[Medline]
  3. Bosniak MA. Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kid ney. AJR1997; 169:819 -821[Free Full Text]
  4. Bosniak MA. The use of the Bosniak classification system for renal cysts and cystic tumors. J Urol1997; 157:1852 -1853[Medline]
  5. Bosniak MA. Problems in the radiologic diagnosis of renal parenchymal tumors. In: Olsson CA, Sawczuk IS, eds. The urologic clinics of North America. Philadelphia: Saunders,1993 : 217-230
  6. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. Calcification in cystic renal masses: is it important in diagnosis? Radiol ogy2003; 226:47 -52
  7. Aronson S, Frazier HA, Balwah JD, Hartman DS, Christenson PJ. Cystic renal masses: usefulness of the Bosniak classification. Urol Radiol 1991;13:83 -90[Medline]
  8. Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK. Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR2000; 175:339 -342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Koga S, Nishikido M, Inuzuka S, et al. An evaluation of Bosniak's radiological classification of cystic renal masses. BJU Int 2000;86:607 -609[Medline]
  10. Levy P, Helenon O, Merran S, et al. Cystic tumors of the kidney in adults: radio-histopathologic correlations. J Radiol1999; 80:121 -133[Medline]
  11. Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, Fisher AJ, Humphrey P, Heiken JP. CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR1997; 169:813 -818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Daniel WW Jr, Hartman GW, Witten DM, Farrow GM, Kelalis PP. Calcified renal masses: a review of ten years experience at the Mayo Clinic. Radi ology1972; 103:503 -508
  13. Ho VB, Allen SF, Hood MN, et al. Renal masses: quantitative assessment of enhancement with dynamic MR imaging. Radiology2002; 224:695 -700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Murad T, Komaiko W, Oyasu R, Bauer K. Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol1991; 95:633 -637[Medline]
  15. Bielsa O, Lloreta J, Gelabert-Mas A. Cystic renal cell carcinoma: pathological features, survival and implication for treatment. Br J Urol 1998;82:16 -20[Medline]
  16. Eble JN, Bonsib SM. Extensively cystic renal neoplasms: cystic nephroma, cystic partially dif ferentiated nephroblastoma, multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma, and cystic hamartoma of renal pelvis. Semin Diagn Pathol 1998;15:2 -20[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Zhang, R. A. Lefkowitz, N. M. Ishill, L. Wang, C. S. Moskowitz, P. Russo, H. Eisenberg, and H. Hricak
Solid Renal Cortical Tumors: Differentiation with CT
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 494 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. Schwarz, S. Vatandaslar, S. Merkel, and H. Haller
Renal Cell Carcinoma in Transplant Recipients with Acquired Cystic Kidney Disease
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2007; 2(4): 750 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. I. Jonisch, A. N. Rubinowitz, P. G. Mutalik, and G. M. Israel
Can High-Attenuation Renal Cysts Be Differentiated from Renal Cell Carcinoma at Unenhanced CT?
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 445 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Ascenti, S. Mazziotti, G. Zimbaro, N. Settineri, C. Magno, D. Melloni, R. Caruso, and E. Scribano
Complex Cystic Renal Masses: Characterization with Contrast-enhanced US
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 158 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Prando, D. Prando, and P. Prando
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Unusual Imaging Manifestations
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 233 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak
How I Do It: Evaluating Renal Masses
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 441 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. X. Minor, B. M. Yeh, A. E. Horvai, H. M. Abrahams, M. V. Meng, and M. L. Stoller
Symptomatic Perirenal Serous Cysts of Mullerian Origin Mimicking Renal Cysts on CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1393 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. S. Hartman, P. L. Choyke, and M. S. Hartman
From the RSNA Refresher Courses: A Practical Approach to the Cystic Renal Mass
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S101 - S115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. M. Israel, N. Hindman, and M. A. Bosniak
Evaluation of Cystic Renal Masses: Comparison of CT and MR Imaging by Using the Bosniak Classification System
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 365 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. A. Bosniak, M. G. Harisinghani, M. M. Maher, D. A. Gervais, and P. R. Mueller
Should We Biopsy Complex Cystic Renal Masses (Bosniak Category III)?
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1425 - 1426.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Is It Safe to Just Follow Moderately Complex Cystic Kidney Lesions?
Journal Watch (General), October 10, 2003; 2003(1010): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bosniak, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bosniak, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS