|
|
||||||||
Radiologic-Pathologic Conference of Wilford Hall Medical Center |
1 Department of Radiology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Ste. 1, 2200 Bergquist
Dr., Lackland AFB, TX 78236-5300.
2 Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey Medical Center, 500
University Dr., Hershey, PA 17033.
3 Department of Rheumatology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB, TX
78236-5300.
4 Department of Pathology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB, TX
78236-5300.
Received December 2, 2002;
accepted after revision January 13, 2003.
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the
authors and are not to be construed as official or as representing the views
of the Department of the Air Force or the Department of Defense.
|
|
|
|
Giant cell arteritis, or temporal arteritis, is one of the most common forms of vasculitis in the United States and northern Europe. Occurring more often in women and in individuals over the age of 50 years, this pathologic condition affects the primary and secondary branches of the aorta and sometimes the aorta itself [1, 2]. Patients may present with fatigue, fever, weight loss, vision loss, headache, arm or jaw claudication, and scalp tenderness. A markedly elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate is almost always present. Little is known about the incidence or the nature of aortitis in the setting of giant cell arteritis, although it is widely accepted that aortic aneurysm and dissection are more common in these patients [3]. Several theories exist as to its pathogenesis, with many authors theorizing that giant cell arteritis is an immune response associated with genetic predisposition or that it is caused by an infectious agent [1, 2].
Histologically, giant cell arteritis appears similar to Takayasu's arteritis, showing granulomatous inflammation of arteries with infiltration predominantly by histiocytes, lymphocytes, and multinucleated giant cells. Multinucleated giant cells are identified, however, in only 50% of temporal artery biopsies in cases of giant cell arteritis; therefore this histologic finding is not required for diagnosis. Moreover, the most active inflammation characteristically occurs along the internal elastic lamina of involved vessels [1].
Temporal arteriography may reveal the extent of vessels involved but is generally invasive and not sufficient for detecting milder degrees of vasculitis [2]. CT angiography is useful for revealing luminal changes, such as stenosis, occlusion, dilation, and aneurysm. It is also useful for showing mural changes to include wall thickening, which correlate well with the inflammatory changes seen histologically, as was the case in this patient. CT may also show calcification and mural thrombi, which may not be adequately visualized on conventional angiography. CT angiography is reportedly 95% sensitive and 100% specific for diagnosing Takayasu's arteritis [4], and similar results may be expected for patients with giant cell arteritis.
Prompt diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis are important to reduce patient morbidity. In particular, vision loss can last for several hours or may be permanent; as many as 15-20% of patients with giant cell arteritis have permanent loss of vision [1].
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. A. Bley, O. Wieben, M. Uhl, J. Thiel, D. Schmidt, and M. Langer High-Resolution MRI in Giant Cell Arteritis: Imaging of the Wall of the Superficial Temporal Artery Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 283 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |