AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, A. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 181:981-985
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Imaging Characteristics of Gastric Lipomas in 16 Adult and Pediatric Patients

William M. Thompson1,2, Amir I. Kende3 and Angela D. Levy1,4

1 Department of Radiologic Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 6825 16th St. NW, Washington, DC 20306-6000.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
3 Department of Gastrointestinal Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC 20306-6000.
4 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd., Bethesda, MD 20814.

Received December 23, 2002; revised April 4, 2003;

 
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or Department of Defense.

Presented at the annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society, San Diego, CA, May 2003.

Address correspondence to W. M. Thompson (thomp132{at}mc.duke.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical, pathologic, and imaging characteristics of gastric lipomas in 16 patients and to compare them with the characteristics of gastric lipomas described in previous reports in the literature. We believe that our study was the largest series that has been reported.

CONCLUSION. Of the 13 patients who had upper gastrointestinal examinations, seven had findings of smooth submucosal masses with ulcerations or depressions. These findings overlap with those of a gastrointestinal stroma tumor and lymphoma. CT findings were specific for the diagnosis of lipoma in eight of nine patients. CT should be used to evaluate large submucosal masses in the stomach to establish a preoperative diagnosis.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Gastric lipoma is a rare lesion, accounting for only 5% of gastrointestinal tract lipomas and fewer than 1% of all gastric tumors [1]. Most gastric lipomas are small asymptomatic lesions that are detected as incidental findings at autopsy [1, 2]. The tumor is composed of well-differentiated adipose tissue surrounded by a fibrous capsule. Most gastric lipomas are found in the submucosa, and most are located in the pyloric antrum. When the tumors are large (> 3–4 cm), the most common clinical presentation is upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, either chronic or acute, caused by ulceration of the neoplasm [25]. Abdominal pain and obstructive symptoms are also common, especially if there is endoluminal growth that could cause intussusception [13, 6]. It is not rare for distal lesions in the prepyloric area to prolapse into the duodenal bulb [2].

Classically, imaging findings that suggest the diagnosis of a gastric lipoma are a smooth, sharply marginated, oval or spherical mass that is compressible during fluoroscopic examination and may exhibit significantly decreased attenuation on barium studies [2, 7]. At endoscopy, some of the lesions are even translucent enough to allow the correct diagnosis. In other lesions, ulceration produces a bull's eye appearance, making these lesions indistinguishable from other submucosal tumors. We believe that this ulcerated appearance has not been emphasized in the radiology literature. Most lipomas are solitary, but cases of multiple lipomas have been reported [8]. CT has proven to be of considerable value in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal lipomas [912]. The lesions appear as well-circumscribed areas of uniform, fatty density with an attenuation ranging from –70 to –120 H. Thus, a gastric lipoma can be definitively diagnosed using CT, which obviates endoscopy or even surgery if the patient is asymptomatic [11, 12].

To our knowledge, no large series focusing on gastric lipomas has yet been reported. We sought to review the clinical, pathologic, and imaging characteristics of 16 gastric lipomas. We paid particular attention to comparing the imaging characteristics that we observed with those that have previously been reported and believe that our study represents the largest group of gastric lipomas reported in the radiology literature.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
From 1970 to July 2002, the cases of 16 patients with gastric lipomas were entered into the radiology–pathology archives of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. We reviewed the clinical data for each patient's age, sex, and presenting signs and symptoms. Gross pathology specimens were available for review for 10 of the 16 patients, and histopathology slides were available for 15 of the 16. The pathology records of each patient were reviewed to establish the size of the tumor and the presence of ulceration or necrosis in the tumor and to correlate pathologic findings with imaging findings.

Upper gastrointestinal examinations were available for review for 13 patients, and CT scans were available for review for nine patients. For six patients, both gastrointestinal examinations and CT scans were available. Because patients at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology are referred from many institutions, the images were obtained using a variety of equipment and different protocols, so the acquisition techniques were not standardized. In addition, only a limited number of images from the upper gastrointestinal examinations were available.

Two radiologists reviewed the upper gastrointestinal examinations to evaluate the size, margins, and density of each lesion; presence of transparency; and evidence of ulceration. CT scans were also reviewed to evaluate tumor margins and to determine whether fatty density, increased density within the mass, or ulceration were present. For three patients, specific Hounsfield values of the lesions were available. The specific location of each lipoma was determined from the upper gastrointestinal examinations; CT scans; and, when necessary, endoscopic correlations.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Clinical Findings
Our study population was composed of nine males and seven females whose ages ranged from 14 to 77 years, with a mean age of 55 years. The most common symptom was abdominal pain (eight patients) or gastrointestinal bleeding (six patients). One patient had both of these symptoms, and another had both abdominal pain and vomiting. One patient had nausea and vomiting, and two patients without abdominal symptoms had lipomas detected incidentally during a workup for other medical problems. An upper gastrointestinal examination was performed in one patient with a history of peptic ulcer disease. All patients had the lipomas surgically excised.

Pathologic Findings
In all 16 patients, gastric lipomas were confirmed histologically, 15 at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and one at an outside hospital. Gross pathologic specimens were available for only 10 of the 16 patients with proven lipomas, but a gross pathologic description was available for all 16. Eleven lesions were located in the antrum, two in the fundus, two in the pylorus, and one in the body of the stomach. The average size of the lipomas was 6.5 cm (range, 3.5–9.0 cm) measured at the greatest dimension. All the lesions had smooth margins, although some had central ulcerations. The tumors in eight patients were ulcerated at the time of resection, and the tumors in two patients had areas of depressions that had undergone necrosis but had not yet developed into ulcers. These depressions were indistinguishable from ulcers seen on the upper gastrointestinal examinations.

Imaging Findings
All 13 lesions available for review on the upper gastrointestinal examinations were detected. Upper gastrointestinal examinations were performed in six of the patients with ulcers and in the two with central depressions. These examinations revealed five (83%) of the 13 ulcers (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C) and both of the depressions (Fig. 2). In one patient, the ulcer was not detected; two patients who had ulcers did not have upper gastrointestinal examinations. Thus, the upper gastrointestinal examinations revealed seven (88%) of the eight ulcers.



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 77-year-old woman with unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding. Radiograph from upper gastrointestinal examination shows 5-cm antral mass (arrow) with central collection of barium consistent with ulcer.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 77-year-old woman with unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding. CT scan reveals mass in antrum with fat attenuation. Note that central collection of barium fills ulceration (arrow).

 


View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 77-year-old woman with unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding. Photograph of gross specimen shows ulceration (arrow) in center of antral mass.

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. 40-year-old man with abdominal pain. Spot image from upper gastrointestinal examination shows 6-cm mass in gastric antrum that contains central collection of barium (solid arrow). Central collection was found to be depression rather than ulcer. Pylorus is marked by open arrow.

 

One 8.5-cm lesion in the fundus of the stomach was hypodense on the upper gastrointestinal examination, a finding suggestive of a lipoma (Fig. 3). All the lesions had smooth margins (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 5), but only this lesion exhibited the significantly decreased density that is consistent with a fat-containing tumor (Fig. 3). The other 12 lesions, particularly the eight with either ulceration or central depressions, mimicked nonfatty submucosal tumors such as a gastrointestinal stroma tumor or a lymphoma (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 2, 3, 4A). Two patients with abdominal pain had pyloric lesions that had prolapsed into the duodenal bulb. Obviously, compressibility of the lesions could not be evaluated.



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. 45-year-old woman with mass in fundus of stomach that was identified on chest radiograph (not shown). Radiograph of fundus from upper gastrointestinal examination shows mass with significantly decreased density and no ulceration, findings suggestive of lipoma.

 


View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 66-year-old man with nausea and vomiting. Radiograph from upper gastrointestinal examination shows large mass (arrows) in body of stomach with no evidence of ulceration.

 


View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 66-year-old man with nausea and vomiting. CT scan shows low-attenuation mass (arrow) that is diagnostic for lipoma.

 


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. 54-year-old woman with 2-year history of intermittent abdominal pain. CT scan shows low-attenuation mass (asterisk) in antrum that is diagnostic of lipoma.

 

All nine CT scans showed a fatty density. The density of the lesions in three patients in whom density was measured was –70, –100, and –117 H, respectively (Figs. 1B, 4B, 5, and 6). One lesion had stranded soft-tissue attenuation coursing through it (Fig. 6) and a significant amount of low-density fat; an ulceration was present in the gross pathology specimen. Thus, CT findings were absolutely diagnostic in eight of nine patients (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C and 4A, 4B, 5, 6) and highly suggestive of the correct diagnosis in the ninth patient (Fig. 7A, 7B). We found it interesting that CT revealed ulceration in one (17%) of six patients who had an ulcerated lipoma (Fig. 1C). The ulceration was also seen on the patient's upper gastrointestinal examination (Fig. 1A).



View larger version (167K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. 22-year-old man with no gastrointestinal symptoms. CT scan obtained for follow-up of testicular cancer shows large 9-cm mass (asterisk) in fundus of stomach. Some high-density areas within mass are visible, but diffuse low density is diagnostic of lipoma.

 


View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A. 78-year-old woman with acute onset of gastrointestinal bleeding. Upper gastrointestinal examination showed large 8-cm mass in antrum with central ulceration. CT scan obtained through antrum shows low-density mass (asterisk) containing some higher density stranding. Ulcer is not visible. Higher density is probably due to ulceration.

 


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B. 78-year-old woman with acute onset of gastrointestinal bleeding. Upper gastrointestinal examination showed large 8-cm mass in antrum with central ulceration. Photograph of gross pathology specimen shows typical features of lipoma extending into lumen. Gastric mucosa is being displaced by lipoma (arrows). Ulcer is not shown.

 

We observed considerable overlap in the size of the lipomas with ulceration and those without ulceration. The average size of the lipomas with ulceration was 7.6 cm and ranged from 4 to 9 cm; the average size of the lesions without ulceration was 6.1 cm and ranged from 3.5 to 9 cm.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The symptoms produced by gastric lipomas are related to the size of the lesion. When small (< 2 cm), lipomas are usually asymptomatic and often discovered incidentally [1, 2]. Gastric lipomas larger than 3 cm are usually symptomatic. The most common findings previously reported in the literature [17]—obstruction and gastrointestinal bleeding—were found in our series. In our 16 patients, abdominal pain was the most common symptom (eight patients, 50%), with gastrointestinal bleeding present in six patients (38%). In two patients (13%) with no abdominal symptoms, the gastric lipomas were discovered incidentally on imaging studies performed for reasons other than upper gastrointestinal symptoms, an occurrence that is not rare in patients with gastric lipomas.

The central depressions in the lipomas in two patients were the only unexpected findings noted in the pathology evaluation. The depressions were thought to be underlying necrosis of the lipomas with no apparent ulcerations. Ulceration might have eventually occurred if the lesions were not resected. These lesions were indistinguishable from ulceration on upper gastrointestinal examinations (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C and 2).

Despite the relativity large size of the lipomas, only one in the fundus exhibited significantly decreased attenuation on the upper gastrointestinal examination that was suggestive of a lipoma (Fig. 3). All lipomas had a smooth surface, even the eight with ulcerations and the two with central depressions. On upper gastrointestinal examination, most of the lesions displayed characteristics of a nonfatty mural mass, suggesting that the lipomas arose from the gastric submucosa or muscular layers, which is where one might expect to find a gastrointestinal stroma tumor, lymphoma, carcinoid, or metastasis. The upper gastrointestinal examination was highly sensitive (88%) for the detection of ulcerations and depressions, which are typical findings for a carcinoid, lymphoma, metastasis, and occasionally gastrointestinal stroma tumor [2, 7]. Lipomas should also be included in this differential diagnosis.

As we discussed earlier, two of our patients had lesions that had prolapsed into the duodenum [2]. We also encountered two lesions that were exophytic, one of which was observed on an upper gastrointestinal examination to be causing significant external compression, a finding suggestive of a serosal rather than a submucosal lesion. CT confirmed the diagnosis of a lipoma in both patients.

CT is the imaging examination of choice for obtaining a specific diagnosis of lipoma. The smallest lesion revealed on CT was 4 cm and had an ulcer that was visible on both upper gastrointestinal examination and CT (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C). A homogeneous gastric mass with a density of between –70 and –120 H has been previously reported as pathognomonic for the diagnosis of gastric lipoma [912]. On CT, gastric lipomas have also been reported to display linear strands of soft-tissue attenuation at the base as well as ulceration of the mucosa that correlated with prominent fibrovascular septa [2]. This finding is similar to that seen in our patient in Figure 7A, 7B. Taylor et al. [2] believed that the presence of these strands visualized on CT in an otherwise uniform, fatty tumor should be taken as a sign of benignity and cautioned against mistaking it for a liposarcoma, which is extremely rare in the alimentary tract. A gastric lipoma can usually be definitively diagnosed using CT, thereby obviating endoscopy or surgery in an asymptomatic patient [2, 11, 12].

If a large (> 2 cm) submucosal mass is detected on an endoscopic or upper gastrointestinal examination, a CT scan should be obtained because CT findings can allow one to make a specific diagnosis of lipoma. If CT does show the characteristic features of a lipoma, a biopsy is not needed [3, 6, 11, 12]. Biopsy is indicated in patients with lesions that are not totally fatty; surgery is indicated in symptomatic patients [1].

Use of MRI has been limited in diagnosing gastric lipomas [13], but MRI is extremely sensitive to fat and could be used instead of CT in certain patient populations, especially in children and perhaps in patients allergic to iodinated contrast agents.

Our retrospective study has limitations. It covered more than 30 years, and the cases studied were collected from multiple institutions. We had the basic clinical data and good copies of the upper gastrointestinal examinations and CT scans available for review. Microscopic slides for 15 of the 16 patients were available for review as were gross specimen photographs for 10 of the 16 patients with gastric lipomas. Therefore, we believe that we have good clinical, radiologic, and pathologic material to document our findings.

In conclusion, our review of data for 16 patients with proven gastric lipomas revealed two significant findings. First, on upper gastrointestinal examinations, lipomas have the appearance of any submucosal tumor; they are indistinguishable from gastrointestinal stroma tumors or lymphoma. Second, CT findings are specific for the diagnosis of gastric lipoma. CT should be used to characterize large submucosal masses before endoscopic biopsy is performed.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Fernandez MJ, Davis RP, Nora PF. Gastrointestinal lipomas. Arch Surg1983; 118:1081 –1083[Abstract]
  2. Taylor AJ, Stewart ET, Dodds WJ. Gastrointestinal lipomas: a radiologic and pathologic review. AJR1990; 155:1205 –1210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Maderal F, Hunter F, Fuselier G, et al. Gastric lipomas: an update of clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 1984;79:964 –967[Medline]
  4. Chu AG, Clifton JA. Gastric lipoma presentations as peptic ulcer: case report and review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 1983;78:615 –618[Medline]
  5. Myint M, Atten MJ, Attar BM, Nadimpalli V. Gastric lipoma with severe hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol1996; 91:811 –812[Medline]
  6. Treska V, Pesek M, Kreuzberg B, et al. Gastric lipomas presenting as upper gastrointestinal obstruction. J Gastroenterol1998; 33:716 –719[Medline]
  7. Calver GJ, Toffolo RP. Criteria for roentgen diagnosis of submucosal gastric lipoma. Radiology1964; 82:254 –257
  8. Deoths TM, Madden PN, Dodds WJ. Multiple lipomas of the stomach and duodenum. Dig Dis1995; 20:771 –774
  9. Heiken JP, Forde KA, Golde RP. Computerized tomography as a definitive method of diagnosing gastrointestinal lipomas. Radiology1982; 142:743 –745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Megibow A, Redmond P, Bosniak M, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal obstruction. J Gastroenterol1998; 33:716 –719
  11. Imoto T, Nobe T, Koga M, Miyamoto Y, Nakata H. Computed tomography of gastric lipomas. Gastrointest Radiol1983; 8:129 –131[Medline]
  12. Kang JY, Chan-Wilde C, Wee A, et al. Role of computed tomography and endoscopy in the management of alimentary tract lipoma. Gut 1990;31:550 –553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Regge D, Lo Belle G, Martincich L, et al. A case report of bleeding gastric lipoma: US, CT and MR findings. Eur Radiol1999; 9:256 –258[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. M. Thompson
Imaging and Findings of Lipomas of the Gastrointestinal Tract
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1163 - 1171.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, A. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS