AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Takeda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Takeda, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 181:1203-1209
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Quantitative Assessment of Diffusion Abnormalities in Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures by Line Scan Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Masayuki Maeda1, Hajime Sakuma1, Stephan E. Maier2 and Kan Takeda1

1 Department of Radiology, Mie University School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

Received January 17, 2003; accepted after revision May 14, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to M. Maeda (mmaeda{at}clin.medic.mie-u.ac.jp).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Acute vertebral collapse is common, and it is sometimes difficult to determine whether the cause is benign or malignant. Recently, diffusion-weighted imaging has been reported to be useful for differentiating the two types. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diffusion abnormalities quantitatively in benign and malignant compression fractures using line scan diffusion-weighted imaging.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Line scan diffusion-weighted imaging was prospectively performed in 17 patients with 20 acute vertebral compression fractures caused by osteoporosis or trauma, in 12 patients with 16 vertebral compression fractures caused by malignant tumors, and in 35 patients with 47 metastatic vertebrae without collapse. Images were obtained at b values of 5 and 1,000 sec/mm2. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in vertebral compression fractures and metastatic vertebrae without collapse.

RESULTS. The ADC (mean ± SD) was 1.21 ± 0.17 x 10–3 mm2/sec in benign compression fractures, 0.92 ± 0.20 x 10–3 mm2/sec in malignant compression fractures, and 0.83 ± 0.17 x 10–3 mm2/sec in metastatic vertebral lesions without collapse. The ADC was significantly higher in benign compression fractures than in malignant compression fractures (p < 0.01), although the two types showed considerable overlap.

CONCLUSION. Although the quantitative assessment of vertebral diffusion provides additional information concerning compressed vertebrae, the benign and malignant compression fracture ADC values overlap considerably. Therefore, even a quantitative vertebral diffusion assessment may not always permit a clear distinction between benign and malignant compression fractures.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Although diffusion-weighted imaging has been established to be useful in the evaluation of central nervous system diseases, particularly in the detection of hyperacute cerebral infarction, it remains uncertain whether this method is also applicable to organs other than the brain. Recently, diffusion-weighted imaging has been applied to the vertebral bodies to differentiate benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. Baur et al. [1, 2] and Spuentrup et al. [3] reported that signal attenuation is obvious in benign compression fractures but is only slight in malignant compression fractures. Differences in diffusion effects may be responsible for the differences observed between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures in that, theoretically, more restricted diffusion is present in malignant compression fractures with packed tumor cells than in benign compression fractures with more mobile water in the extracellular volume fraction. However, simple qualitative analyses of data from diffusion-weighted images may raise the question of whether the T2 shine-through effect may have contributed to the appearance observed on such images [4].

Subsequently, a small number of investigators have quantified the diffusion in abnormal vertebrae in terms of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and have concluded that quantitative assessment is more useful than qualitative assessment in differentiating benign vertebral fractures from malignant lesions [5, 6]. Although their data suggested that the quantification of diffusion was more precise in the characterization of collapsed vertebrae and was therefore more useful in differentiating benign and malignant compression fractures, their methods had limitations that may have affected the validity of their findings. The first is related to the low b value (250 sec/mm2) used in diffusion-weighted imaging [5], and the second is caused by the use of the echoplanar sequence [6], which is easily affected by susceptibility artifacts.

Line scan diffusion-weighted imaging is an advantageous method for spine imaging because it is inherently insensitive to motion artifacts and susceptibility artifacts [7]. We performed line scan diffusion-weighted imaging with a higher b value of 1,000 sec/mm2 to permit the quantification of diffusion as well as to obtain high-quality diffusion-weighted images. The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the ADC value of the bone marrow in differentiating benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
A total of 64 consecutive patients (39 women, 25 men) examined between January 2001 and March 2002 were included in this prospective study. These patients were divided into three groups. The first group comprised 17 patients (mean age, 71.1 years) with 20 benign vertebral compression fractures caused by acute osteoporotic causes or trauma. The delay between the onset of clinical symptoms and MRI in patients with compression fractures was less than 1 month after onset. A cutoff of 1 month was selected because in our clinical experience, most patients with vertebral compression fractures come to our hospital to consult their doctors 1–3 weeks after the onset of pain. Furthermore, it is usually during the first month that MRI studies are obtained to determine the cause of the vertebral collapse.

The diagnoses were essentially confirmed in 16 of 17 patients with benign compression fracture by clinical follow-up after more than 6 months. In these patients, back pain resolved or decreased gradually 2–7 months after the initial MRI. In one patient, the clinical history ruled out malignancy as the cause of the fracture, which occurred during a motor crash. Surgery was performed in this patient because the vertebral fracture resulted in compression of the spinal canal. In nine patients, follow-up MRIs were performed 2–14 months after the initial MRI to rule out neoplasms. Four patients received steroid treatment at the time of onset for hypereosinophilic syndrome, retroperitoneal fibrosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, and pemphigoid. Six patients had a clinical history of malignant tumors, including breast cancer, rectal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, and malignant lymphoma.

The second group comprised 12 patients (mean age, 61.9 years) with 16 vertebral compression fractures caused by malignant tumors. None of these patients had undergone chemotherapy or radiation therapy for malignant bone lesions before the MRI study. The malignant vertebral tumors included one primary malignant tumor (sarcoma not otherwise specified) and 15 metastatic malignant tumors from breast cancer (n = 3), lung cancer (n = 3), prostate cancer (n = 3), multiple myeloma (n = 3), renal cell carcinoma (n = 1), stomach cancer (n = 1), and malignant melanoma (n = 1). In nine of the 12 patients, the diagnosis of malignant fracture was established on the basis of the deteriorated clinical course and the findings of follow-up MRI and CT. A malignant nature of involvement of posterior elements and paravertebral soft-tissue masses was rated as an unequivocal imaging finding of malignancy [13]. In one patient (with sarcoma not otherwise specified), the primary tumor was not detected, and open biopsy was subsequently performed. Autopsy was performed in one patient with lung cancer. In another patient with lung cancer, a pathologic diagnosis was obtained when the patient underwent emergency surgery because the vertebral lesion had progressed, resulting in severe compression of the spinal canal.

The third group comprised 35 patients (mean age, 62.2 years) with 47 metastatic vertebrae without compression fractures. The diagnoses were confirmed at pathologic examination of specimens obtained by CT-guided needle biopsy in eight patients, at surgery in five patients, and at autopsy in three patients. In the remaining 19 patients, the clinical diagnosis was established by unequivocal MRI and CT findings of metastatic disease of the spine with primary neoplasms, as described in the second group. The primary cancers included lung cancer (n = 18), breast cancer (n = 10), prostate cancer (n = 6), stomach cancer (n = 4), esophageal cancer (n = 2), multiple myeloma (n = 2), renal cell carcinoma (n = 2), Paget's cancer (n = 1), malignant melanoma (n = 1), and thyroid cancer (n = 1). No patients with metastatic vertebral lesions had received radiation therapy or chemotherapy for the bone lesions before the MRI study.

MRI Sequence
The line scan diffusion-weighted imaging method described previously [7] was performed using a spinal array surface coil on a 1.5-T MRI system (Signa, General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). Neither cardiac gating nor respiratory triggering was used. Images were acquired with a rectangular field of view (32 x 16 cm or 32 x 24 cm), a matrix size of 128 x 128 columns, and a bandwidth of 7.81–10.4 kHz. The effective section thickness was set at 5 mm, with an intersection gap of 1 mm. Diffusion was assessed in three orthogonal directions, in each of which two images were obtained, one with a low diffusion weighting (b factor) of 5 sec/mm2 and the other with a high b factor of 1,000 sec/mm2. Other parameters were as follows: TR of 2,093–3,498 msec, TE of 70.5 msec, and 1 excitation. The scan time per slice was 26–37 seconds, and totals of three or five slices were obtained in the sagittal plane. Other MRI sequences included sagittal spin-echo T1-weighted imaging (TR/TE, 400/8) and sagittal fast spin-echo T2-weighted imaging with or without fat suppression (3,000/105). Sagittal contrast-enhanced fat suppression T1-weighted imaging (550/8) was performed in four patients with benign compression fractures and in 20 patients with malignant vertebral tumors with or without collapse.

Data Analysis
Isotropic diffusion images with a high b factor were generated from the three diffusion directions assessed. Trace ADC maps were generated using the equation described by Stejskal and Tanner [8],

where b is the diffusion weighting factor, S is the signal intensity of the diffusion trace for b equals maximum, and S0 is the signal intensity for b equals 5 sec/mm2. Measurements were obtained from the trace ADC maps by placing regions of interest over the collapsed vertebral bodies (benign or malignant) and uncollapsed vertebral lesions with replacement by malignant tumor. In addition, ADC measurements were obtained for 34 normal vertebrae in 17 patients with benign compression fractures. Special care was taken to avoid contamination of the signal by cerebrospinal fluid or the intervertebral disks. In each group, the two-sided Student's t test was applied to detect any significant differences in mean ADC values. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Qualitative analysis was performed for benign and malignant compression fractures. Two experienced radiologists evaluated the line scan diffusion-weighted images (b = 1,000 sec/mm2). Image review was performed with special attention paid to the appearance of bone marrow changes in the compression fractures. On the line scan diffusion-weighted images, the signal intensities in the fractured vertebral bodies were classified as hypointense, isointense, hyperintense, or of mixed signal intensity relative to adjacent normal bone marrow in the same patient. Statistical evaluation for the qualitative comparison between benign and malignant compression fractures was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Quantitative Analysis
The ADC (mean ± SD) was 1.21 ± 0.17 x 10–3 mm2/sec in benign compression fractures, 0.92 ± 0.20 x 10–3 mm2/sec in malignant compression fractures, and 0.83 ± 0.17 x 10–3 mm2/sec in metastatic vertebral lesions without collapse. The plotted data are shown in Figure 1. The ADC in benign compression fractures was significantly higher than that in malignant compression fractures (p < 0.01). No statistically significant difference was observed between malignant compression fractures and metastatic vertebral lesions without compression fractures. The ADC values of four malignant compression fractures overlapped with those of benign compression fractures. Normal bone marrow showed a minimal ADC value of (0.18 ± 0.09) x 10–3 mm2/sec. The ADC maps showed that the ADC of benign and malignant compression vertebral lesions was higher than that of normal bone marrow (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Summary of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in abnormal vertebrae. ADC values in benign compression fractures (n = 20) are significantly higher than those in malignant compression fractures (n = 16, p < 0.01). Note considerable overlap between benign and malignant compression fracture ranges. Differences in ADC values between malignant compression fractures and metastases without compression fractures (n = 47) are not statistically significant. NS = not significant.

 


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 65-year-old woman with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture of 12th thoracic vertebral body who received steroids for Churg-Strauss syndrome. T1-weighted spin-echo image (TR/TE, 400/8) shows low signal intensity in compression fracture (arrow). Fatty marrow is partially reserved, particularly in dorsal area (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 65-year-old woman with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture of 12th thoracic vertebral body who received steroids for Churg-Strauss syndrome. T2-weighted fast spin-echo image (3,000/105) shows mixed (iso- and hypo-) signal intensity in compression fracture.

 


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. 65-year-old woman with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture of 12th thoracic vertebral body who received steroids for Churg-Strauss syndrome. Diffusion-weighted image (b value = 1,000 sec/mm2) shows mixed (iso- and hypo-) signal intensity (arrow) relative to adjacent normal vertebral bodies.

 


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D. 65-year-old woman with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture of 12th thoracic vertebral body who received steroids for Churg-Strauss syndrome. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map shows increased diffusion in compression fracture (arrow). ADC value of compression fracture is 1.26 x 10–3 mm2/sec. ADC in area of reserved fatty marrow (arrowhead) is low.

 


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 51-year-old woman without history of primary malignancy who was initially referred for MRI for suspected benign compression fracture. Open biopsy later revealed primary sarcoma not otherwise specified. T1-weighted spin-echo image (TR/TE, 400/8) shows low signal intensity in compression fracture of third lumbar vertebral body (arrow).

 


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 51-year-old woman without history of primary malignancy who was initially referred for MRI for suspected benign compression fracture. Open biopsy later revealed primary sarcoma not otherwise specified. Fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo image (3,000/105) shows mixed (iso- and hyper-) signal intensity in compression fracture. No definite abnormalities are seen in other vertebrae.

 


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. 51-year-old woman without history of primary malignancy who was initially referred for MRI for suspected benign compression fracture. Open biopsy later revealed primary sarcoma not otherwise specified. Diffusion-weighted image (b = 1,000 sec/mm2) shows hypointensity (arrow) in compressed vertebral body.

 


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D. 51-year-old woman without history of primary malignancy who was initially referred for MRI for suspected benign compression fracture. Open biopsy later revealed primary sarcoma not otherwise specified. Apparent diffusion coefficent (ADC) map shows increased diffusion in compressed vertebral body (arrow). ADC value of compressed vertebral body is 0.97 x 10–3 mm2/sec.

 


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 70-year-old woman with multiple metastatic vertebrae from lung cancer who died 12 days after MRI examination. Autopsy revealed necrosis in central regions and viable tumor cells in peripheral regions. T1-weighted spin-echo (TR/TE, 400/8) (A) and fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo (3,000/105) (B) images show compression fractures of third and fourth lumbar vertebral bodies (arrows, A) as well as multiple metastatic vertebrae without compression fractures. First lumbar vertebra (arrowhead, A) shows normal signal intensity.

 


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 70-year-old woman with multiple metastatic vertebrae from lung cancer who died 12 days after MRI examination. Autopsy revealed necrosis in central regions and viable tumor cells in peripheral regions. T1-weighted spin-echo (TR/TE, 400/8) (A) and fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo (3,000/105) (B) images show compression fractures of third and fourth lumbar vertebral bodies (arrows, A) as well as multiple metastatic vertebrae without compression fractures. First lumbar vertebra (arrowhead, A) shows normal signal intensity.

 


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. 70-year-old woman with multiple metastatic vertebrae from lung cancer who died 12 days after MRI examination. Autopsy revealed necrosis in central regions and viable tumor cells in peripheral regions. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo image (550/8) shows heterogeneity of metastatic vertebrae. Regions of faint or no enhancement correspond to high signal areas on T2-weighted images, suggesting necrosis.

 


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D. 70-year-old woman with multiple metastatic vertebrae from lung cancer who died 12 days after MRI examination. Autopsy revealed necrosis in central regions and viable tumor cells in peripheral regions. Diffusion-weighted image (b = 1,000 sec/mm2) shows mixed (iso- and hypo-) signal intensity of compressed vertebrae (arrows) relative to normal vertebral bodies (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4E. 70-year-old woman with multiple metastatic vertebrae from lung cancer who died 12 days after MRI examination. Autopsy revealed necrosis in central regions and viable tumor cells in peripheral regions. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map shows increased diffusion in compressed third and fourth lumbar vertebral bodies (arrows). ADC values of compressed vertebral bodies are 1.14 and 1.31 x 10–3 mm2/sec, respectively. Normal vertebra (arrowhead) shows decreased diffusion.

 

Qualitative Analysis
Clinical cases showing the signal intensities of benign and malignant compression fractures relative to the adjacent normal vertebrae on the line scan diffusion-weighted images (b = 1,000 sec/mm2) are shown in Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E. The findings in each group are summarized in Table 1. With regard to benign compression fractures, most (75%) showed hypointensity relative to normal vertebrae, followed by mixed (iso- and hypo-) intensity and isointensity. Hyperintensity was not seen in benign compression fractures. On the other hand, the malignant compression fractures showed relatively variable signal intensities. Hyperintensity was seen in one case of malignant compression fracture. Qualitative analysis showed no statistically significant difference between benign and malignant compression fractures. The ADC values (mean ± SD) in each group are also summarized in Table 1. The mean ADC in each group was lower in malignant compression fractures than in benign compression fractures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Summary of Signal Intensities of Fractured Vertebrae on Line Scan Diffusion-Weighted Images for Benign and Malignant Fractures and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Each Type

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The application of diffusion-weighted imaging to the examination of the central nervous system has proven useful, particularly in acute stroke [9]. Feasibility studies have also explored the potential of diffusion imaging in other areas, including the liver, pancreas, kidney, head and neck, and vertebrae [16, 1015]. The application to vertebral compression fractures is both challenging and exciting because differentiating acute benign from malignant fractures poses a diagnostic dilemma and influences the patient's treatment and prognosis [16, 17]. Baur et al. [1] first reported that diffusion-weighted imaging could provide excellent distinction between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. Acute benign fractures with an increase of interstitial space caused by edema or hemorrhage could increase water mobility, whereas a compact accumulation of tumor cells in malignant compression fractures might reduce the interstitial space and water mobility [1]. This hypothesis is interesting and seems reasonable. Although qualitative analysis was performed in early reports [13], more recent reports have also supported this hypothesis by quantifying diffusion in abnormal vertebrae [5, 6].

Our preliminary results indicate that line scan diffusion-weighted imaging of the spine is feasible and provides excellent images without specialized hardware, cardiac gating, or respiratory compensation. Line scan diffusion-weighted imaging uses multiple diffusion-weighted spin-echo column excitations to form a 2D image [18]. This method is insensitive to motion artifacts because the images are constructed column by column and the acquisition time for an individual column is approximately equal to the TE. Patient motion or physiologic pulsatile motion may result in loss of signal from the column of data, although the remainder of the image is unaffected. Most important, in our series, line scan diffusion-weighted images of the thoracic spine were not significantly degraded by cardiac pulsation or respiratory motion. Vertebral diffusion-weighted imaging, unlike single-shot echoplanar imaging, minimizes susceptibility-related image distortions and signal loss, which is an advantage. In addition, this method is ideally suited to scanning of the spine because the rectangular field of view of a sagittally oriented scan matches the aspect ratio of the spinal column, and adjacent structures of little interest do not need to be scanned.

We selected a higher b value (1,000 sec/mm2) than that used in previous reports [15]. In the central nervous system, values on the order of 1,000 sec/mm2 have been suggested for cerebral diffusion-weighted imaging. Although the optimal b value for vertebral diffusion-weighted imaging has yet to be determined, maximum b values lower than 500 sec/mm2 may be too low to provide information concerning diffusion. Such low b values may lead to ADC data obtained in normal or abnormal vertebral tissues different than those obtained using higher b values. Zhou et al. [5] reported that benign compression fractures and metastatic lesions had lower ADC values than normal vertebral bodies when a b value of 250 sec/mm2 was used. However, this is unlikely to be true in diffusion studies using higher b values. We found that normal bone marrow showed minimal diffusion at a high b value of 1,000 sec/mm2, and the ADC was much lower than that in abnormal bone marrow. Our results agree with those of previous reports in which higher b values were used [6, 19, 20].

In our study, the ADC in benign compression fractures was statistically higher than that in malignant compression fractures. However, the ADC values overlapped considerably between the two groups (Fig. 1). Thus, our quantitative results did not provide the clear distinction between benign and malignant compression fractures that was found in previous reports. Chan et al. [6] reported no ADC overlap between benign and malignant compression fractures. Zhou et al. [5] also reported that the two distinct disease groups were well separated on the basis of ADC values. In our study, several factors such as the diffusion sequence, the b value, and the time elapsed since occurrence of the fracture differed from those in previous studies [5, 6]. These differences might have been responsible for the difference in results between our study and other studies.

However, it is not clear whether the age of the fracture (< 1 month) has a significant influence on the results. In the inclusion criteria we used, the age of the fracture was less than 1 month, which was longer than those in previous studies (< 14 days) [1, 3, 6]. In benign compression fractures, it might be hypothesized that the ADC would decrease over time because compression fractures can recover normal fatty bone marrow. However, all of our patients with benign compression fractures showed low signal on T1-weighted images at the time of the MRI study, indicating the absence of fatty marrow recovery. In general, the recovery of fatty bone marrow requires several months in patients with benign compression fractures. Yamato et al. [21] reported that during a 3-month period after an injury, the extent of the low-signal areas of benign collapsed vertebrae on T1-weighted images increased in 40% of cases. Complete recovery of fatty marrow was observed at 65–708 days (mean, 290 days). Further investigations are necessary to clarify the influence of the age of the fracture on the ADC.

We found relatively high ADC values (> 1.0 x 10–3 mm2/sec) in four malignant compression fractures, and the ADC values in these cases overlapped with those in cases with benign compression fractures. We see three possible reasons for these results. First, necrotic tissues in malignant bone tumors can increase the ADC. Necrosis in bone tumors causes an increase in the extracellular volume fraction, resulting in a high ADC, as documented in a previous study [22]. In such cases, necrotic portions of malignant vertebrae can be suggested on T2-weighted images or contrast-enhanced images, as seen in Figure 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E.

Second, a larger fraction of associated bone marrow edema may explain the high ADC in malignant compression fractures. Le Bihan [23] reports that in malignant compression fractures, a mixture of interstitial edema and malignant tumor cellularity occurs and may reduce the specificity of the diffusion analysis. Finally, the hypervascular portion of malignant tumors that increases the proportion of the perfusion effect may be responsible for the high ADC measurement results [24]. The use of perfusion-corrected diffusion-weighted imaging may overcome this problem.

In our qualitative results, most (75%) benign compression fractures showed hypointensity relative to adjacent normal vertebrae on line scan diffusion-weighted images, but only 19% of malignant compression fractures showed hypointensity, whereas some showed variable signal intensities including hypo-, iso-, hyper-, and mixed intensity. However, qualitative analysis showed no significant difference between benign and malignant compression fractures. We found only one case of malignant compression fracture that was hyperintense relative to normal bone marrow. This is not in agreement with the results of Baur et al. [1, 2] or Spuentrup et al. [3], who found that all but a few cases of metastatic fracture showed hyperintensity relative to normal bone marrow. We consider that this difference is probably caused by the higher b value used in our study (b = 1,000 sec/mm2) compared with that used in previous studies (b values ranging from 165 to 598 sec/mm2). Malignant vertebral lesions usually show hyperintensity on T2-weighted images. At low b values, T2 effects particularly modify the signal intensities obtained in diffusion-weighted images. If malignant vertebrae have relatively slow diffusion and relatively high T2 values, diffusion-weighted images at low b values would show hyperintensity of malignant vertebrae relative to normal bone marrow. However, T2 effects are less prominent and diffusion has a greater influence at higher b values such as 1,000 sec/mm2. The ADC of malignant compression fractures is lower than that of benign compression fractures but higher than that of normal vertebrae. Therefore, diffusion-weighted images acquired at b equals 1,000 sec/mm2 can present variable signal intensities in malignant compression fractures depending on the ADC and T2 values of the lesions, as seen in our results.

Qualitative analysis has a number of theoretic disadvantages. One problem is that qualitative analysis cannot completely eliminate the T2 shine-through effect [46], as previously mentioned. Another problem is that the fraction of fatty marrow in normal vertebrae can vary from patient to patient. Vertebrae with a larger fraction of fatty marrow would show a lower ADC because the ADC of fat is low [24]. The fraction of fatty marrow is influenced by factors such as the patient's age and hematopoietic status. For example, normal hypercellular marrow in children shows a higher ADC than normal normocellular marrow in adults, but the latter shows a higher ADC than normal hypocellular marrow in adults [25]. Therefore, normal vertebrae can show variable signal intensities on diffusion-weighted images with higher b values and can exhibit variable ADC values according to the degree of fatty marrow in the particular patient. Thus, it is not valid to standardize the signal intensities of fractured vertebrae in comparison with those of adjacent normal vertebrae.

Unlike the promising results obtained in previous studies [13, 5, 6], our results showed considerable overlap between benign and malignant compression fractures; therefore, even quantitative assessment could not provide a clear distinction between the two types, although further investigations involving larger numbers of patients are necessary to clarify this point. It has been reported that conventional MRI also has several features that are useful for differentiation, including the marrow space signal intensity with various sequences, the location and extent of the signal abnormalities in the compressed vertebral body, involvement of the pedicles and neural arch structures, the presence of epidural or paravertebral soft-tissue masses, the contour of the dorsal cortex of the involved vertebral body, the presence of other spinal metastases, and the pattern of contrast enhancement [16, 17, 26, 27]. When these criteria are applied, MRI studies have shown accuracy rates in the range of 79–94%, depending on the methods used and the patients selected [16, 17, 26]. However, some of these MRI features are not observed in every case. For example, in patients without a history of cancer but with equivocal clinical or conventional MRI findings, the quantitative assessment of diffusion may provide additional information and a clue to differentiation and may thus prove helpful in reaching a decision as to whether to perform bone biopsy, as we saw in one of our patients (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D). Although quantitative assessment alone may have only limited value in terms of the differential diagnosis, we feel that it provides additional useful information as an adjunct to conventional MRI findings.

In conclusion, our preliminary study has shown that ADC values are significantly higher in benign compression fractures than in malignant compression fractures. Such quantitative assessment provides additional information concerning compressed vertebrae and may be a useful adjunct to conventional MRI findings in the differential diagnosis. However, considerable overlap in the ADC values was observed between benign and malignant compression fractures in this study. Although it is necessary to study a larger number of patients before reaching a conclusion, it appears that even quantitative assessment may not provide clear separation between benign and malignant compression fractures.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology1998; 207:349 –356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Baur A, Huber A, Ertl-Wagner B, et al. Diagnostic value of increased diffusion weighting of a steady-state free precession sequence for differentiating acute benign osteoporotic fractures from pathologic vertebral compression fractures. AJNR2001; 22:366 –372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Adam G, van Vaals JJ, Guenther RW. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign fracture edema and tumor infiltration of the vertebral body. AJR2001; 176:351 –358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK, Fisher LL. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. AJNR2000; 21:948 –953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Zhou XJ, Leeds NE, McKinnon GC, Kumar AJ. Characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR imaging. AJNR2002; 23:165 –170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chan JHM, Pen WCG, Tsui EYK, et al. Acute vertebral body compression fractures: discrimination between benign and malignant causes using apparent diffusion coefficients. Br J Radiol2002; 75:207 –214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Maier SE, Gudbjartsson H, Patz S, et al. Line scan diffusion imaging: characterization in healthy subjects and stroke patients. AJR 1998;171:85 –93[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965;42:288 –292
  9. Warach S, Chien D, Li W, Ronthal M, Edelman RR. Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke. Neurology 1992;42:1717 –1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, Nitatori T, Araki T. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. AJR 1998;170:397 –402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Mitsuzaki K, et al. Mucin-producing tumor of the pancreas: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology1998; 208:605 –609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Yamada I, Aung W, Himeno Y, Nakagawa T, Shibuya H. Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology1999; 210:617 –623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, et al. Measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in diffuse renal disease by diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging1999; 9:832 –837[Medline]
  14. Fukuda Y, Ohashi I, Hanafusa K, et al. Anisotropic diffusion in kidney: apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for clinical use. J Magn Reson Imaging2000; 11:156 –160[Medline]
  15. Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F, et al. Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology2001; 220:621 –630[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yuh WTC, Zachar CK, Barloon TJ, Sato Y, Sickels WJ, Hawes DR. Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging. Radiology1989; 172:215 –218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Baker LL, Goodman SB, Perkash I, Lane B, Enzmann DR. Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging. Radiology1990; 174:495 –502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gudbjartsson H, Maier SE, Mulkern RV, et al. Line scan diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med1996; 36:509 –519[Medline]
  19. Ward R, Caruthers S, Yablon C, et al. Analysis of diffusion changes in posttraumatic bone marrow using navigator corrected diffusion gradients. AJR 2000;174:731 –734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Byun WM, Shin SO, Chang Y, Lee SJ, Finsterbusch J, Frahm J. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of metastatic disease of the spine: assessment of response to therapy. AJNR2002; 23:906 –912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Yamato M, Nishimura G, Kuramochi E, Saiki N, Fujioka M. MR appearance of different ages of osteoporotic compression fracture of the vertebrae. Radiat Med1998; 16:329 –334[Medline]
  22. Lang P, Wendland MF, Saeed M, et al. Osteogenic sarcoma: noninvasive in vivo assessment of tumor necrosis with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology1998; 206:227 –235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Le Bihan DJ. Differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: a closer step toward the "holy grail" of tissue characterization? Radiology1998; 207:305 –307[Free Full Text]
  24. van Rijswijk CS, Kunz P, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AHM, Doornbos J, Bloem JL. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the characterization of soft-tissue tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging2002; 15:302 –307[Medline]
  25. Nonomura Y, Yasumoto M, Yoshimura R, et al. Relationship between bone marrow cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:757 –760[Medline]
  26. Cuenod CA, Laredo JD, Chevret S, et al. Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology1996; 199:541 –549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. An HS, Andreshak TG, Nguyen C, Williams A, Daniels D. Can we distinguish between benign versus malignant compression fractures of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging? Spine1995; 20:1776 –1782[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Satoh, Y. Kitazume, S. Ohdama, Y. Kimula, S. Taura, and Y. Endo
Can Malignant and Benign Pulmonary Nodules Be Differentiated with Diffusion-Weighted MRI?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 464 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Y. Oner, L. Aggunlu, S. Akpek, T. Tali, and A. Celik
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Appendicular Skeleton with a Non Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Sequence
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1494 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H.G. Hatipoglu, A. Selvi, D. Ciliz, and E. Yuksel
Quantitative and Diffusion MR Imaging as a New Method To Assess Osteoporosis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 1934 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.J. Nemeth, J.W. Henson, M.E. Mullins, R.G. Gonzalez, and P.W. Schaefer
Improved Detection of Skull Metastasis with Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1088 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.A.K. A. Razek, A.Y. Kandeel, N. Soliman, H.M. El-shenshawy, Y. Kamel, N. Nada, and A. Denewar
Role of Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar MR Imaging in Differentiation of Residual or Recurrent Head and Neck Tumors and Posttreatment Changes
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1146 - 1152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D.-M. Koh and D. J. Collins
Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Body: Applications and Challenges in Oncology
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1622 - 1635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.Y. Oner, T. Tali, F. Celikyay, A. Celik, and P. Le Roux
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Spine with a Non-Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Sequence: Initial Experience
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. C. Zajick Jr, W. B. Morrison, M. E. Schweitzer, J. A. Parellada, and J. A. Carrino
Benign and Malignant Processes: Normal Values and Differentiation with Chemical Shift MR Imaging in Vertebral Marrow
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 590 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Maeda, H. Kato, H. Sakuma, S. E. Maier, and K. Takeda
Usefulness of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Line Scan Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing between Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Malignant Lymphomas of the Head and Neck
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1186 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Nagata, M. Maeda, H. Tsukahara, S. E. Maier, and K. Takeda
Brain Stem Hypertensive Encephalopathy Evaluated by Line Scan Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 803 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Takeda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.