|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard
Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.
2 Present address: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine, Keio
University, Tokyo, Japan.
Received February 12, 2003;
accepted after revision July 1, 2003.
Supported by GE-YMS Educational Fund.
Abstract
|
|
|---|
MATERIALS AND METHODS. CT records of 163 consecutive patients imaged with CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism were retrospectively reviewed at our institution. The patients underwent CT pulmonary angiography with three different types of CT scanners. All images were visually assessed by two thoracic radiologists for excessive collapse of the trachea and the main bronchi. The cross-sectional area of the lumen at the site of maximal collapse of the airway was measured, and the percentage of luminal narrowing was calculated by comparing it with the cross-sectional area of the airway lumen at an adjacent area without collapse. We defined tracheomalacia as a 50% or greater decrease in tracheal lumen.
RESULTS. Sixteen (10%) of 163 patients showed evidence of tracheomalacia (seven men, nine women; age range, 4195 years; mean age, 72 years). The most common presenting symptom was shortness of breath, which was observed in 13 (81%) of 16 patients. Known causes of tracheomalacia were found in 15 (94%) of 16 patients, prior intubation was confirmed in 12 patients, and history of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was observed in five patients.
CONCLUSION. Tracheomalacia is a relatively common incidental finding on CT pulmonary angiography studies. The central airways, as well as pulmonary vasculature, should be reviewed carefully for clinical interpretation in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Paired expiratoryinspiratory CT is recommended if patients present with known causes of tracheomalacia such as prior intubation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma.
|
|
|---|
Tracheobronchomalacia is characterized by increased compliance and excessive collapsibility of trachea or bronchi. Increase in compliance is due to loss of structural integrity of components in the tracheal wall and may be congenital or acquired [9]. The causes of congenital tracheomalacia include cartilage deficiency, generalized tracheomalacia, and congenital tracheoesophageal fistula [9]. Acquired tracheomalacia is associated with endotracheal tubes and tracheostomy, closed chest trauma, lung resection, radical neck dissection, radiation therapy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, relapsing polychondritis, paratracheal vascular abnormality, and chronic or recurrent infection [9].
CT pulmonary angiography is an established diagnostic tool to evaluate pulmonary embolism [1012]. Patients with pulmonary embolism typically have dyspnea or pleuritic chest pain [13]. However, the symptoms are often nonspecific and overlap with a variety of other thoracic conditions. Considering the relatively high incidence of tracheobronchomalacia in patients with dyspnea and other nonspecific respiratory symptoms, we hypothesized that significant numbers of patients with tracheobronchomalacia could be shown by CT pulmonary angiography in a population with clinical suspicion for pulmonary embolism. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of tracheomalacia incidentally detected on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
|
|
|---|
Axial images were reconstructed with intervals as follows: 1.5 mm for single-detector CT, 1.25 mm for four-detector rows, and 0.6 mm for eight-detector rows. The studies were interpreted on a PACS (picture archiving and communication system) (PathSpeed, General Electric Medical Systems). Images were reviewed using combined cine stack with static one-on-one viewing. All images were displayed in both mediastinal (window level, 40 H; window width, 350 H) and lung (window level, 500 H; window width, 1500 H) window settings.
Although patients were instructed to hold their breath during the CT study, many patients were unable to maintain prolonged breath-holds. If patients could not hold their breath during the study, they were instructed to resume quiet breathing. Because our scanning protocol is caudalcranial, such breathing is usually maximal in the upper and mid chest. Thus, in some patients, the trachea and main bronchi were incidentally scanned during both inspiration and expiration.
For each patient, all images were visually assessed for collapse of the trachea through bronchi by two thoracic radiologists who each had more than 5 years' clinical experience. They assessed the images by consensus. Patients with collapsed trachea on visual analysis of images were recorded as having suspected tracheomalacia. Subsequently, after the initial review of all cases, those patients with suspected tracheomalacia were further analyzed quantitatively by performing cross-sectional area measurement of the tracheal lumen on lung window settings. For quantitative analysis of the degree of collapse, the cross-sectional areas were measured at the site of maximal collapse of the airway and at the closest adjacent region of the trachea without collapse between the levels of thoracic inlet to carina. From these two values, the percentage of luminal narrowing was calculated. We defined tracheomalacia as a 50% or greater decrease in tracheal lumen [1, 14]. Exclusion criteria included extrinsic mass compressing the trachea or bronchi.
Clinical histories were also reviewed retrospectively to identify chief complaints for undergoing CT pulmonary angiography, medical history, and hospital course. Our institutional review board approved our study of the retrospective review of medical records and images but did not require patient informed consent for this retrospective study.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifteen of the 16 patients with tracheomalacia showed no significant tracheal wall thickening. However, one patient exhibited diffuse airway collapse with associated wall thickening that measured greater than 3 mm [15]. The combination of malacia and wall thickening may be associated with relapsing polychondritis, but we are not aware of a known diagnosis of this patient's condition. However, the crescentic form of tracheal collapse was shown in this patient; therefore, tracheomalacia was diagnosed (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C).
|
|
|
Two patients with collapsed bronchi were observed. Because of the technical difficulty in determining the sites of maximal collapse and the airway with maximal cross-sectional area, these patients were not included in the 16 positive cases because there was no evidence of associated collapse of the trachea.
There were no patients in whom an extrinsic mass compressing the trachea was identified. Thus, no patients were excluded on this basis.
|
|
|---|
For clinical interpretation on CT pulmonary angiography, radiologists necessarily place emphasis on pulmonary vasculature rather than on the airways. However, our results emphasize the importance of also carefully inspecting the central airways on CT pulmonary angiography studies. In our study, known causes of tracheomalacia were found in 15 of 16 patients; prior intubation was confirmed in 12 patients; and history of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was observed in five patients. Both radiologists and referring physicians should become familiar with the various causes of tracheomalacia and should consider this possibility when evaluating patients with nonspecific symptoms such as shortness of breath. Indeed, the central airways should be reviewed carefully in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism who have known potential causes of tracheomalacia because unrecognized tracheomalacia can cause life-threatening airway obstruction [16].
Our results show that a significant number of tracheomalacia cases might be over-looked in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. The incidental detection of tracheomalacia on CT pulmonary angiography warrants a dedicated CT airway study to confirm the extent of this disorder. Clinical correlation with patient history, including history of cough, wheezing, shortness of breath, and stridor, is also important; correlative pulmonary function tests may also be helpful because they often show characteristic findings in patients with tracheomalacia [1]. For patients with documented tracheomalacia on a CT airway study, significant clinical symptoms, and characteristic pulmonary function test findings, interventional therapy may be beneficial [17].
The retrospective nature of our study limited our ability to verify the presence of tracheomalacia and to determine its clinical impact. However, on the basis of our experience in imaging patients with tracheomalacia, the degree of airway narrowing that we observed in this series of patients is usually considered clinically significant. Future prospective studies are necessary in this regard.
Although our study showed the incidence of tracheomalacia to be nearly 10% in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, there were additional limitations. We compared the tracheal lumen at different levels, but because the trachea has a relatively fixed size throughout its intrathoracic course [18], our quantitative definition of tracheomalacia should still be reasonably accurate. Because we did not have any patients with bronchoscopically proven disease, we cannot confirm the accuracy of our findings with a gold standard. For the diagnosis of tracheomalacia on imaging studies, paired inspiratoryexpiratory CT or cine evaluation is generally necessary to definitively diagnose tracheomalacia. The most physiologically sensitive indicator of tracheomalacia is thought to be tracheal collapse during coughing on cine evaluation [1]. Alternatively, the rare focal stenosis or diffuse fixed tracheal stenosis could be included in our positive cases. However, tracheal stenosis from intubation is usually a focal coronal narrowing without bowing of the posterior membranous wall. The characteristic morphology of tracheomalacia with the pronounced crescentic anterior bowing of the posterior wall is helpful for confirming the diagnosis [1]. Therefore, it is unlikely that we misdiagnosed tracheal stenosis as tracheomalacia.
Despite these limitations, it is likely that more patients with tracheomalacia could have been detected with supplemental expiratory CT because we had 15 patients with collapsed trachea whose cross-sectional area showed less than 50% luminal narrowing, which did not meet our strict criteria for malacia. Kao et al. [8] reported that the maximal decrease in tracheal caliber was seen before end expiration. Therefore, we believe that patients with tracheomalacia in this study are true-positive cases.
In conclusion, the prevalence of tracheomalacia in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography was 10% in this study. The central airways as well as pulmonary vasculature should be reviewed carefully in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Paired inspiratoryexpiratory CT is recommended if patients present with dyspnea without chest pain and known cause of tracheomalacia, such as prior intubation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma. Future prospective studies of such patients using paired inspiratoryexpiratory CT or cine evaluation for tracheomalacia would be helpful for more accurately characterizing the prevalence of this disorder.
Acknowledgments
We thank Donna Wolfe for editorial assistance and Ronald J. Kukla for
assistance with photography.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. S. Lee, M. R. M. Sun, A. Ernst, D. Feller-Kopman, A. Majid, and P. M. Boiselle Comparison of Dynamic Expiratory CT With Bronchoscopy for Diagnosing Airway Malacia: A Pilot Evaluation Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 758 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Baroni, S. Ashiku, and P. M. Boiselle Dynamic CT Evaluation of the Central Airways in Patients Undergoing Tracheoplasty for Tracheobronchomalacia Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1444 - 1449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Miyazawa, Y. Miyazu, Y. Iwamoto, A. Ishida, K. Kanoh, H. Sumiyoshi, M. Doi, and N. Kurimoto Stenting at the Flow-limiting Segment in Tracheobronchial Stenosis due to Lung Cancer Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2004; 169(10): 1096 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |