AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalantari, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalantari, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 181:1621-1625
© American Roentgen Ray Society


CT Features with Pathologic Correlation of Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Bone Marrow Transplantation in Adults

Babak N. Kalantari1, Koenraad J. Mortelé1, Vito Cantisani1, Silvia Ondategui1, Jonathan N. Glickman2, Adheet Gogate1, Pablo R. Ros1 and Stuart G. Silverman1

1 Department of Radiology, Section of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115.
2 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.

Received April 4, 2003; accepted after revision June 2, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to K. J. Mortelé (kmortele{at}partners.org).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. This study was conducted to describe the CT features of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease in adults and to correlate these findings with the pathologic grades of disease severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients (n = 22) with a history of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and pathologically confirmed acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease underwent contrast-enhanced (n = 13) and unenhanced (n = 9) CT. CT scans were retrospectively evaluated for intestinal and extraintestinal abnormalities by two radiologists who were unaware of the biopsy results. The CT findings were correlated with the pathologic grade of disease severity using the Pearson's correlation coefficient and the two-tailed nonparametric Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS. CT features included small-bowel wall thickening (22/22), engorgement of the vasa recta adjacent to affected bowel segments (20/22), stranding of the mesenteric fat (16/22), large-bowel wall thickening (13/22), bowel dilatation proximal to thickened wall segments (5/22), ascites (10/22), periportal edema (8/22), mucosal enhancement (7/13), and serosal enhancement (4/13). The wall thickening had a discontinuous distribution in nine patients (41%). Bowel wall thickening was associated with high-grade graft-versus-host disease in patients in whom the distal esophagus (p = 0.015), ileum (p = 0.034), or ascending colon (p = 0.05) was involved. Increasing numbers of thickened bowel segments correlated with high-grade graft-versus-host disease (r = 0.548, p = 0.008). Increasing numbers of abnormal CT findings did not correlate with high-grade graft-versus-host disease (r = 0.117, p = 0.604).

CONCLUSION. A variety of bowel abnormalities can be seen on CT in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease. CT findings associated with high-grade graft-versus-host disease are thickening of the distal esophagus, ileum, or ascending colon, as well as increasing numbers of thickened bowel wall segments.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Graft-versus-host disease occurs when functionally competent T lymphocytes are introduced into an immunocompromised recipient [1, 2]. Acute graft-versus-host disease presents within the first 100 days of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and is one of the major complications of this procedure [3]. The skin, gastrointestinal tract, and liver are the principal targeted organs in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease. Symptoms of this disease are often nonspecific and include abdominal cramping, diarrhea, fever, nausea, and vomiting. The differential diagnosis includes gastrointestinal infections, neutropenic enterocolitis, and, during the early posttransplantation period, sequelae of chemotherapy and radiation treatment [13].

Because abdominal symptoms are nonspecific, imaging of the abdomen is frequently performed to evaluate patients for abscess or perforation of the bowel wall. The prognosis of patients with acute graft-versus-host disease is dependent on whether they receive early treatment with immunosuppressive medications; thus, a prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential [4, 5]. The CT appearance of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease in an adult population has been described only briefly in the literature [6, 7]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the CT findings in adults with biopsy-confirmed gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease and to correlate the CT findings with the pathologic results.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Subjects
From 1997 to 2001, 22 adults (seven men and 15 women; age range, 26–55 years; mean age, 44 years) with a history of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and pathologically confirmed acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease underwent IV contrast–enhanced (n = 13) and unenhanced (n = 9) CT performed within 100 days of bone marrow transplantation (range, 10–98 days; average, 52 days). Eighteen patients underwent human leukocyte antigen–matched bone marrow transplantation (14 unrelated donors; four related donors) and four, human leukocyte antigen–mismatched bone marrow transplantation (two unrelated donors; two related donors). The clinical indications for transplantation were diverse: 13 patients with leukemia, three with myelodysplastic syndrome, two with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, two with Hodgkin's lymphoma, one with essential thrombocytosis and myelofibrosis, and one with agnogenic myeloid metaplasia.

At presentation with suspected acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease, patients had symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, anorexia, diarrhea, and intestinal bleeding. All patients underwent endoscopic examination with biopsies of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts to confirm the diagnosis, determine disease severity, and exclude coexisting infectious enteritis.

Imaging Technique
Abdominopelvic CT was performed using single- or multidetector CT units (Somotom Plus 4 or Volume Zoom, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). Contrast-enhanced CT scans (slice thickness, 3 mm; reconstruction interval, 5 mm) were obtained 60–70 sec after IV administration of 100 mL of 300 mg I/mL iopromide (Ultravist 300, Berlex Laboratories, Montvale, NJ), injected at a rate of 3.0 mL/sec using a power injector. Opacification of the digestive tract was achieved with oral administration of 900 mL of a contrast agent (Readi-Cat, E-Z-EM, Westbury, NY) before the examination.

Image Analysis
CT scans were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists who were unaware of the biopsy results, with the final interpretations made by consensus. The gastrointestinal tract was divided into 10 segments (distal esophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum) and was evaluated for the presence of wall thickening (defined as > 3 mm) of the distal esophagus, stomach, small intestine, or colon; bowel dilatation (defined as >= 3 cm for the small bowel and >= 8 cm for the colon); and fluid-filled loops of bowel, pneumatosis, mucosal enhancement, or serosal enhancement in any location. The presence of extraintestinal findings was also assessed; these included engorgement of the vasa recta, stranding of the mesenteric fat, ascites, mesenteric lymphadenopathy, gallbladder dilatation, gallbladder wall thickening or enhancement, biliary sludge, pericholecystic fluid, hepatomegaly, periportal edema, splenomegaly, urinary bladder wall enhancement, and bladder wall thickening.

Histopathologic Analysis
All gastrointestinal biopsy specimens were fixed in formalin and processed for paraffin sections in the routine fashion. H and E–stained slides were reviewed and graded by an experienced gastrointestinal pathologist. The histologic diagnosis of acute graft-versus-host disease was based on previously described criteria [8] in patients whose biopsies showed epithelial cell apoptosis or crypt cell dropout or destruction. Histologic severity of the graft-versus-host disease was graded (grade range, I–IV), also using previously described criteria [9]. All cases were evaluated for viral cytopathic changes or other evidence of infection.

Statistical Analysis
CT findings were compared with the results of histopathologic examinations. Data were analyzed using statistical software (SPSS 10.0, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Chicago, IL). Associations between the CT findings and histopathologically determined disease grade were assessed using the Pearson's correlation coefficient. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlation was calculated using the two-tailed nonparametric Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
CT Findings
The predominant CT findings in the intestines of patients with acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease are summarized in Table 1. Bowel wall thickening was present in at least one site in all cases. All 22 patients had small-bowel wall thickening detectable on CT, whereas 13 (59%) of the 22 patients had thickening of the walls in both the small and large bowels (Fig. 1). Wall thickening had a discontinuous distribution in nine patients (41%), with normal portions of bowel separating the involved segments. No predilection for involvement of specific sections of the small or large bowel by the disease was observed. Bowel-loop dilatation was present in five patients (23%) and always occurred proximal to the thickened wall segments (Fig. 2). Bowel mucosal enhancement was identified in seven (54%) of the 13 patients in whom enhancement was assessed (Fig. 3); serosal enhancement was noted in four (31%) of the 13 patients (Fig. 4). Abnormally enhancing bowel segments were always thickened.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Intestinal CT Findings in Patients with Histologically Confirmed Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease

 


View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. 49-year-old man with pathologically confirmed grade IV acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Axial contrast-enhanced helical CT scan shows diffuse wall thickening involving small (short arrows) and large (long arrow) bowel in region of ileocecal valve.

 


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. 43-year-old woman with pathologically confirmed grade IV acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Axial contrast-enhanced helical CT scan shows small-bowel wall thickening (short arrow) with proximal dilatation (long arrow).

 


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. 41-year-old woman with pathologically confirmed grade IV acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Axial contrast-enhanced helical CT scan shows ascites and small-bowel wall thickening with mucosal enhancement (arrows).

 


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. 50-year-old woman with pathologically confirmed grade IV acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Axial contrast-enhanced helical CT scan shows ascites, small- and large-bowel wall thickening, and mucosal and serosal enhancement (arrows).

 

Extraintestinal abdominal CT findings are summarized in Table 2. The most consistent finding (20/22 patients or 91%) was engorgement of the vasa recta, which was more pronounced adjacent to the thickened bowel wall segments (Fig. 5). Stranding of the mesenteric fat was present in 16 patients (73%) and was more prominent near areas of abnormal bowel wall thickening. Nine patients (41%) had one or more abnormalities affecting the gallbladder–biliary tract.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Abdominal CT Findings in 22 Patients with Histologically Confirmed Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. 43-year-old woman with pathologically confirmed grade IV acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Axial contrast-enhanced helical CT scan shows engorgement of vasa recta (arrows) that is more pronounced adjacent to thickened bowel wall segments.

 

Histopathologic Findings
Diagnostic biopsies were obtained from the colon in 15 patients, from the stomach in three patients, and from more than one site in four patients (stomach and colon in one patient; duodenum and colon in one patient; duodenum and stomach in one patient; and ileum, stomach, and colon in one patient). Histologic analysis showed varying degrees of epithelial cell apoptosis, crypt cell dropout and destruction, and mucosal inflammation (Fig. 6A, 6B). Grade I graft-versus-host disease was diagnosed in six patients (32%), grade II in eight patients (27%), grade III in two (9%), and grade IV in six (32%). Areas of bowel wall thickening showed submucosal edema with varying degrees of lymphocytic infiltration. Results of immunohistochemical stains for cytomegalovirus were negative in all patients.



View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A. 49-year-old man with pathologically confirmed grade IV acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Photomicrographs of histopathologic rectosigmoid biopsy specimens reveal findings that confirm diagnosis. Low-power image (A) shows surface ulceration (arrow, A, indicating surface), with absence of glands in mucosa, crypt cell dropout, and nearly complete loss of epithelium, whereas high-power image (B) reveals epithelial cell apoptosis (arrow, B) and lymphocytic infiltration of lamina propria. (H and E, both slides)

 


View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B. 49-year-old man with pathologically confirmed grade IV acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Photomicrographs of histopathologic rectosigmoid biopsy specimens reveal findings that confirm diagnosis. Low-power image (A) shows surface ulceration (arrow, A, indicating surface), with absence of glands in mucosa, crypt cell dropout, and nearly complete loss of epithelium, whereas high-power image (B) reveals epithelial cell apoptosis (arrow, B) and lymphocytic infiltration of lamina propria. (H and E, both slides)

 

CT–Pathologic Correlation
Pathologically high-grade graft-versus-host disease (grade III–IV) was significantly associated with the CT finding of bowel wall thickening involving the distal esophagus (p = 0.015), ileum (p = 0.034), or ascending colon (p = 0.05). Increasing numbers of thickened bowel locations observed on CT scans also correlated with high-grade disease (r = 0.548, p = 0.008). However, increasing total numbers of abnormal CT findings did not correlate with high-grade disease (r = 0.117, p = 0.604).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Graft-versus-host disease remains the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with allogeneic bone marrow transplants [3]. Despite prophylaxis with immunosuppressive agents, clinically significant acute graft-versus-host disease occurs in 15–50% of adults who receive an allogeneic bone marrow transplant [35]. The incidence of graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients increases with the degree of mismatch between the donor's major histocompatibility antigens and those of the recipient [10]. The skin, gastrointestinal tract, and liver are the most commonly affected organ systems. Involvement of the gastrointestinal tract in cases of acute graft-versus-host disease is often severe and characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and fever.

Symptoms in patients with suspected gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease are nonspecific, and imaging is often performed to evaluate for an abdominal source of sepsis [11, 12]. Differentiation of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease from infectious enterocolitis is crucial because the former is treated with immunosuppressive agents, a treatment that is contraindicated in infectious enterocolitis. To our knowledge, the CT appearance of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease has been only briefly described in the radiology literature, and no large series has been performed in an adult population [6, 7, 13, 14]. Given the high sensitivity of CT for accurately showing the bowel wall and adjacent structures [7], accurate identification of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease may obviate further diagnostic testing and expedite therapeutic intervention.

In our series, bowel wall thickening was the most common finding, present in all patients with biopsy-confirmed acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. On CT scans, all patients had small-bowel involvement, and 59% of patients also had wall thickening of the large bowel. The areas of thickening corresponded histologically with submucosal edema and scattered inflammatory cells. The wall thickening was discontinuous in 41% of the patients, with normal bowel segments separating focally affected portions. We do not believe that this discontinuous pattern of bowel involvement has been previously described in studies of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease [6, 7, 1320]. Bowel-loop dilatation, when present, was universally found proximal to a thickened bowel wall segment. The specificity of these findings for diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease as opposed to other causes of enteritis, however, requires further investigation.

The finding of an abnormally enhanced bowel mucosa was noted in 54% of the patients whose scans were obtained with IV contrast medium. This finding is in agreement with that of a prior study of acute graft-versus-host disease in children [14]. The reported frequency of mucosal enhancement in our series may be artificially low because the intraluminal oral contrast medium may have obscured the depiction of an enhancing layer of bowel wall mucosa [14]. Enhancement of the bowel serosa was observed in 31% of patients whose scans were obtained with IV contrast medium. We believe that this CT finding has not been described in previous reports of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease [6, 7, 13, 14].

Among the extraintestinal findings for acute graft-versus-host disease in our series, engorgement of the vasa recta adjacent to thickened bowel wall segments was the most prevalent finding, observed in 91% of our patients. This CT finding is consistent with the results of a prior color Doppler sonographic study that described increased arterial perfusion of the bowel wall and increased superior mesenteric artery flow in most patients with acute graft-versus-host disease [21]. As reported in earlier studies [6, 7, 13, 14], stranding of the mesenteric fat was observed in 73% of the patients in our series; stranding was more pronounced near regions of thickened bowel wall. However, mesenteric lymphadenopathy was not identified on the scan of any patient, suggesting that the presence of lymphadenopathy should raise the suspicion of other inflammatory or infectious processes in a patient with suspected acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease.

Of note, 41% of the patients in our study showed one or more abnormalities of the gallbladder–biliary tract, including gallbladder wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, biliary sludge, and enhancement of the gallbladder wall. A previous study concerning the CT appearance of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease in children described a high frequency of gallbladder wall enhancement and dilatation [14]. Acalculous cholecystitis is a feared complication in recipients of bone marrow transplants, with a high mortality rate in patients undergoing operative interventions such as cholecystectomy [22, 23]. Considering the significant percentage of patients in our series with abnormalities of the gallbladder–biliary tract, acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease should be considered as the potential cause of acalculous cholecystitis in bone marrow transplant recipients.

The histopathologic severity of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease is determined by assessing the involvement of the intestinal tract. Grade I graft-versus-host disease is characterized as mild disease; grade II, as moderate; and grades III–IV, as severe [24]. Grading is important in evaluating the response to prophylaxis or treatment and in determining prognosis. Patients with moderate to severe graft-versus-host disease have a significantly higher mortality rate than those with the mild form of the disease [25]. Overwhelming sepsis is the primary cause of death in patients with acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease [26]. In our study, histopathologic grades III and IV graft-versus-host disease were significantly associated with the CT finding of wall thickening involving the distal esophagus, ileum, or ascending colon. Similarly, increasing numbers of thickened bowel locations observed on CT scans correlated with high-grade graft-versus-host disease. The presence of these CT findings, therefore, increases the likelihood that severe acute graft-versus-host disease is present and that the patient with such findings has a poor prognosis. However, we found that increasing numbers of abnormal findings on abdominal CT did not correlate with pathologically confirmed high-grade disease.

Our study has three important limitations. It was a nonrandomized retrospective study. We had no control group of patients who were believed to have graft-versus-host disease but whose pathologic results for the disease were negative; thus, our ability to draw conclusions regarding the specificity of the CT findings for acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease was limited. Finally, the diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease was presumptive in the nine patients who showed only CT abnormalities of the small bowel. However, even in patients such as these, the presumptive diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease is relatively solid if small-bowel abnormalities are seen on CT, results of cultures are negative, and biopsies of other sites (stomach, duodenum, or colon) reveal graft-versus-host disease, with no findings suggestive of viral infection present.

In summary, the CT appearance of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease in adults includes bowel wall thickening with or without proximal dilatation, engorgement of the vasa recta, mesenteric fat stranding, mucosal and serosal enhancement, gallbladder–biliary tract abnormalities, and ascites. The CT findings associated with high grade graft-versus-host disease were thickening of the distal esophagus, ileum, or ascending colon, as well as increasing numbers of thickened bowel wall segments.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Tabbara IM, Zimmerman K, Morgan C, Nahlch Z. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: complications and results. Arch Intern Med2002; 162:1558 –1566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Iqbal N, Salzman D, Lazenby AJ, Wilcox CM. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host-disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:3034 –3038[Medline]
  3. Thomas ED. Bone marrow transplantation: a review. Semin Hematol 1999;36:95 –103[Medline]
  4. Flowers ME, Kansu E, Sullivan KM. Pathophysiology and treatment of graft-versus-host disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am1999; 13:1091 –1112[Medline]
  5. McDonald GB, Shulman HM, Sullivan KM, Spencer GD. Intestinal and hepatic complications of human bone marrow transplantation. Gastroenterology1986; 90:460 –477[Medline]
  6. Jones B, Fishman EK, Kramer SS, et al. Computed tomography of gastrointestinal inflammation after bone marrow transplantation. AJR 1986;146:691 –695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Horton KM, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of the colon: inflammatory disease. Radio-Graphics2000; 20:399 –418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bombi JA, Nadal A, Carreras E, et al. Assessment of histopathologic changes in the colonic biopsy in acute graft-versus-host disease. Am J Clin Pathol1995; 103:690 –695[Medline]
  9. Sale GE, Shulman HM, McDonald GB, Thomas ED. Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease in man: a clinicopathologic study of the rectal biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol1979; 3:291 –299[Medline]
  10. Klingebiel T, Schlegel PG. GVHD: overview on pathophysiology, incidence, clinical and biological features. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998;21[suppl 2]:S45 –S49
  11. Jones B, Wall SD. Gastrointestinal disease in the immunocompromised host. Radiol Clin North Am1992; 30:555 –577[Medline]
  12. Wall SD, Jones B. Gastrointestinal tract in the immunocompromised host: opportunistic infections and other complications. Radiology1992; 185:327 –335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Benya EC, Sivit CJ, Quinones RR. Abdominal complications after bone marrow transplantation in children: sonographic and CT findings. AJR 1993;161:1023 –1027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Donnelly LF, Morris CL. Acute graft-versus-host disease in children: abdominal CT findings. Radiology1996; 199:265 –268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Jones B, Kramer SS, Saral R, et al. Gastrointestinal inflammation after bone marrow transplantation: graft-versus-host disease or opportunistic infection? AJR1988; 150:277 –281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Maile CW, Frick MP, Crass JR, Snover DC, Weisdorf SA, Kersey JH. The plain abdominal radiograph in acute gastrointestinal graft-vs.-host disease. AJR1985; 145:289 –292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Patzik SB, Smith C, Kubicka RA, Kaizer H. Bone marrow transplantation: clinical and radiologic aspects. RadioGraphics1991; 11:601 –610[Abstract]
  18. Rosenberg HK, Serota FT, Koch P, Borden S 4th, August CS. Radiographic features of gastrointestinal graft-vs.-host disease. Radiology1981; 138:371 –374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Schimmelpenninck M, Zwaan F. Radiographic features of small intestinal injury in human graft-versus-host disease. Gastrointest Radiol 1982;7:29 –33[Medline]
  20. Schuttevaer HM, Kroon HM, Chandie Shaw P. Graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract. Diagn Imaging Clin Med1986; 55:254 –261[Medline]
  21. Klein SA, Martin H, Schreiber-Dietrich D, et al. A new approach to evaluating intestinal acute graft-versus-host disease by transabdominal sonography and color Doppler imaging. Br J Haematol2001; 115:929 –934[Medline]
  22. Chirletti P, Caronna R, Meloni G, et al. Acute abdominal complications in bone marrow transplant recipients. Chir Ital 2002;54:511 –516[Medline]
  23. Wiboltt KS, Jeffrey RB Jr. Acalculous cholecystitis in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Eur J Surg1997; 163:519 –524[Medline]
  24. Vogelsang GB, Wagner JE. Graft-versus-host disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am1990; 4:625 –639[Medline]
  25. Weisdorf D, Snover DC, Haake R, et al. Acute upper gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: clinical significance and response to immunosuppressive therapy. Blood1990; 76:624 –629[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Schwartz JM, Wolford JL, Thornquist MD, et al. Severe gastrointestinal bleeding after hematopoietic cell transplantation, 1987–1997: incidence, causes, and outcome. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:385 –393[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Ketelsen, W. Vogel, W. Bethge, M. Werner, K. Dietz, C. D. Claussen, and M. Horger
Enlargement of the Common Bile Duct in Patients With Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease: What Does It Mean?
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): W181 - W185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
J. L. Irani, C. S. Cutler, E. E. Whang, T. E. Clancy, S. Russell, R. S. Swanson, S. W. Ashley, M. J. Zinner, and C. P. Raut
Severe Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-vs-Host Disease: An Emerging Surgical Dilemma in Contemporary Cancer Care
Arch Surg, November 1, 2008; 143(11): 1041 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Stelljes, S. Hermann, J. Albring, G. Kohler, M. Loffler, C. Franzius, C. Poremba, V. Schlosser, S. Volkmann, C. Opitz, et al.
Clinical molecular imaging in intestinal graft-versus-host disease: mapping of disease activity, prediction, and monitoring of treatment efficiency by positron emission tomography
Blood, March 1, 2008; 111(5): 2909 - 2918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Macari, A. J. Megibow, and E. J. Balthazar
A Pattern Approach to the Abnormal Small Bowel: Observations at MDCT and CT Enterography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1344 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. M. Erturk, K. J. Mortele, C. A. Binkert, J. N. Glickman, M.-R. Oliva, P. R. Ros, and S. G. Silverman
CT features of hepatic venoocclusive disease and hepatic graft-versus-host disease in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1497 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalantari, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalantari, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS