AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:161-165
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

MDCT of Tendon Abnormalities Using Volume-Rendered Images

K. Ohashi1, G. Y. El-Khoury and D. L. Bennett

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA 52242.

Received April 14, 2003; accepted after revision July 8, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to K. Ohashi (kenjirou-ohashi{at}uiowa.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our objectives were to report tendon abnormalities diagnosed on 3D volume-rendered images from MDCT data and to validate the clinical usefulness of this technique.

CONCLUSION. We present 18 tendon abnormalities from 16 patients that were diagnosed on 3D volume-rendered MDCT images generated by commercially available software. Certain abnormalities such as avulsions, partial tears, and dislocations of tendons are clearly shown by this technique. This technique may prove useful in the evaluation of tendon abnormalities when MRI or sonography cannot be used.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Imaging of tendons has been the domain of MRI and sonography. The effectiveness of both techniques has been well validated [1, 2]. However, sonography is limited in that it is not widely accepted by orthopedic surgeons and some radiologists are not skilled in musculoskeletal sonography. Also, these techniques cannot be used in some patients because of metal hardware, surgical wounds, and open lacerations in the area of interest. MRI is contraindicated in patients who are claustrophobic or who have a pacemaker or metal in the orbits.

MDCT has had a significant impact on musculoskeletal imaging, especially in trauma. Detectors are aligned in the longitudinal (z-axis) direction that simultaneously collect four to 16 CT slices with each tube rotation. The advantages of MDCT over its predecessor, single-slice helical CT, are increased speed and coverage, isotropic imaging capability, reduced metallic artifacts, and ease of interpretation. MDCT can acquire isotropic or near-isotropic data sets from which high-quality 3D images can be reconstructed [3]. In a recent study, Pelc and Beaulieu [4] performed postprocessing on CT data sets using commercially available workstations to quantify differences in attenuation values among bone, tendon, and muscle to display 3D volume-rendered images of normal tendons. The ease with which 3D images of tendons can be acquired is the result of the availability of independent workstations that are capable of displaying 3D volume-rendered images quickly [3]. When the ever-increasing number of images generated by MDCT are viewed, acquired data are now looked at as a volume to be explored rather than as individual images. Three-dimensional images are often the key images.

To our knowledge, no report yet shows the clinical use of 3D volume-rendered images from MDCT data for visualizing tendon abnormalities. In this article, we present 18 tendon abnormalities from 16 patients diagnosed on 3D volume-rendered MDCT images. In six patients (seven tendon abnormalities), the abnormalities were surgically proven. In one patient, the CT findings were confirmed by MRI.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Eighteen tendon abnormalities from 16 patients (10 male and six female, 12–80 years old; average age, 43 years) were prospectively diagnosed on 3D volume-rendered images generated by MDCT. Imaging diagnoses were made in consensus by three musculoskeletal radiologists. Clinical correlations were obtained from the medical records. This investigation was performed before implementation of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, and our institutional review board did not require its approval or informed consent for this type of study.

MDCT studies were obtained by a four–detector row CT scanner (Aquilion, Toshiba American Medical Systems, Tustin, CA) using the following parameters: 120–135 kVp, 75–130 mAs (0.5-sec gantry rotation period), 2-mm slice thickness (x 4), 7- to 9-mm table travel per rotation, 512 x 512 matrix, and a 180- to 240-mm field of view. Axial images were reconstructed with 2-mm slice thickness at every 0.5-mm interval using a 136- to 200-mm reconstruction field of view (0.3- to 0.4-mm in-plane pixel dimension). Raw data were processed into axial images using a standard soft-tissue kernel (algorithm).

Multiplanar reformatted images and 3D volume-rendered images were generated on a Vitrea 2 computer workstation (version 3.0.1, Vital Images, Plymouth, MN). These images were reconstructed from axial image data sets that were transferred over an intradepartmental network, Kodak PACS (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY), using the DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) protocol.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The CT and clinical findings for 16 patients diagnosed as having tendon abnormalities on MDCT 3D volume-rendered images are summarized in Table 1. The indication for all the CT studies was to evaluate osseous abnormalities. Six patients had acute fractures; the rest complained of chronic symptoms associated with chronic fractures, tarsal coalition, lateral ankle impingement, and peroneal tubercle hypertrophy. Four patients had orthopedic hardware in the region of interest: one patient each had an external fixator, knee prosthesis, ankle prosthesis, or surgical screws.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Patients with Tendon Abnormalities

 

Abnormalities were found in three Achilles tendons, 12 peroneal tendons, one posterior tibial tendon, one biceps femoris tendon, and one quadriceps tendon. Tendon abnormalities included 11 peroneal tendon dislocations (Fig. 1A, 1B), three partial tears (two Achilles and one quadriceps) (Figs. 2 and 3A, 3B), two tendons (peroneus longus and posterior tibial tendons) with tendinopathy (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C), two anomalous tendons (biceps femoris and Achilles tendon) (Fig. 5A, 5B), and one Achilles tendon avulsion (Fig. 3A, 3B). One patient had both a partial tear and an avulsion of the Achilles tendon. Seven tendon abnormalities from six patients were surgically confirmed. One tendon abnormality (tendinopathy) was confirmed on MRI (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C).



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 18-year-old woman with bilateral anterior dislocation of peroneus brevis tendons and bilateral calcaneal fractures. Axial CT image of left ankle shows anterolateral dislocation of peroneus brevis tendon (short arrow) and small avulsed bone fragment from lateral malleolus (long arrow).

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 18-year-old woman with bilateral anterior dislocation of peroneus brevis tendons and bilateral calcaneal fractures. Volume-rendered 3D CT image viewed from lateral aspect of left ankle shows anteriorly dislocated peroneus brevis tendon (short arrow). Avulsed bone fragment (long arrow) from fibula is also visualized. Similar findings were seen on right (not shown). Dislocated peroneal tendons were surgically reduced bilaterally.

 


View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. 46-year-old man with partial tear of Achilles tendon. Volume-rendered image from helical CT data shows eccentric defect (arrow) of Achilles tendon that is consistent with partial tear. Achilles tendon thickening may reflect underlying tendinopathy.

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 21-year-old man with avulsion of Achilles tendon from calcaneal tuberosity and partial tear of Achilles tendon. Sagittally reconstructed CT image shows avulsed bone fragment (white arrow) from calcaneus (black arrow). Achilles tendon (arrowheads) is retracted superiorly.

 


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 21-year-old man with avulsion of Achilles tendon from calcaneal tuberosity and partial tear of Achilles tendon. Volume-rendered CT image viewed from posterior aspect of ankle shows eccentric defect (long arrow) in substance of Achilles tendon, which is seen inserting onto avulsed bone fragment (short arrow). These findings were surgically confirmed.

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 45-year-old man with tendinopathy of peroneus longus tendon. Volume-rendered CT image of lateral aspect of ankle shows markedly hypertrophied peroneal tubercle (long arrow). Note thickening of peroneus longus tendon (short arrow) distal and inferior to peroneal tubercle.

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 45-year-old man with tendinopathy of peroneus longus tendon. Axial CT image through calcaneus shows hypertrophied peroneal tubercle (arrow).

 


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. 45-year-old man with tendinopathy of peroneus longus tendon. Sagittal T1-weighted image (TR/TE, 440/21) shows thickening of peroneus longus tendon (short arrow) with increased signal at peroneal tubercle (long arrow). MRI findings confirm presence of tendinopathy.

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A. 46-year-old man with incidental finding of anomalous tibial insertion of biceps femoris tendon. Volume-rendered 3D CT image viewed from lateral aspect of knee shows biceps tendon (short arrows) inserting onto lateral aspect of proximal tibia. Lateral collateral ligament (long arrow) is partially visualized and is seen to insert on head of fibula.

 


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B. 46-year-old man with incidental finding of anomalous tibial insertion of biceps femoris tendon. Sagittally reconstructed CT image through fibular head shows tibial insertion of biceps tendon (arrows). Lateral collateral ligament is also seen (arrowheads) between lateral femoral condyle and fibular head.

 

Peroneus tendon dislocations were readily recognized on the 3D volume-rendered images (Fig. 1A, 1B) and are commonly associated with calcaneal fractures. Partial tears of the Achilles tendon were seen as eccentric defects (Figs. 2 and 3A, 3B). In one patient, an avulsed Achilles tendon was associated with a bone fragment from the calcaneal tuberosity (Fig. 3A, 3B). In another patient, severe attenuation of the quadriceps tendon was diagnosed as a partial tear that was confirmed at surgery. Diagnosis of tendinopathy was based on focal or diffuse thickening of the tendon and associated symptoms and physical findings (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C). Anomalous insertion of the biceps femoris tendon onto the tibia (Fig. 5A, 5B) and an accessory soleus were incidentally found on the 3D volume-rendered images.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In addition to its increased speed and volume coverage, MDCT has a definite advantage with enhanced resolution in the longitudinal axis (z-axis), which is essential for obtaining isotropic or near-isotropic data sets. With isotropic or near-isotropic imaging, 2D multiplanar images in any arbitrary plane and 3D images can be reconstructed from the volumetric data. With postprocessing workstations and fast rendering speed, one can navigate through the data set interactively, creating a variety of 2D and 3D reformatted images almost instantaneously. The display of spatial relationships on 3D images can aid in diagnosis and surgical planning, especially in patients with complex musculoskeletal injuries. Some authors have reported a change in management for 30% of patients with acetabular fractures when 3D imaging is used [5]. The 2D multiplanar reconstructions, in any arbitrary plane, and 3D volume rendering are frequently more helpful than axial images in reaching a diagnosis. With volume rendering, the CT voxel values are assigned an opacity level that varies from total transparency to total opacity. Lighting effects and various levels of transparency are displayed simultaneously. It is more effective to view volume-rendered images of soft tissues in color than in black-and-white [3, 6].

Before the advent of MDCT, several attempts were made at imaging tendons using conventional CT; the technique, however, had some drawbacks that limited its widespread use [711]. The multiplanar reconstructions showed poor spatial resolution and the reconstructed 3D images invariably produced stairstep artifacts [12]. In addition, the step–shoot action necessary for table translation was too slow, and the section-by-section acquisition produced misregistration artifacts as a result of involuntary motion.

The technique described in this article is simple and uses widely available technology. As with MRI, CT is not operator-dependent, although both techniques require strong knowledge of the technology. Image processing methods vary among scanners. However, a standard soft-tissue kernel (algorithm) for postprocessing produces better soft-tissue contrast [4]. Optimal peak kilovoltage and tube current settings further improve soft-tissue contrast, although these have not been thoroughly investigated. With such technique parameters, the integrity of tendons can be routinely inspected on MDCT studies of the joints and extremities performed for a variety of indications, including trauma. Metal artifacts from orthopedic hardware are less pronounced with MDCT scanners than with earlier CT scanners [13]. Three-dimensional volume-rendered imaging can illustrate metal hardware clearly (Fig. 3A, 3B).

Abnormalities such as tendon avulsion (Fig. 3A, 3B), partial tear (Figs. 2 and 3A, 3B), anomalous tendon insertion (Fig. 5A, 5B), and dislocation (Fig. 1A, 1B) of superficial tendons can be easily detected on 3D volume-rendered MDCT images. Peroneal tendon dislocation, especially, is easily recognized with this technique. Peroneal tendon dislocation is considered a rare injury [14], but it is commonly associated with calcaneal fractures because of lateral displacement of the major fracture fragments [15]. Using this technique, the integrity of the peroneal tendons and their relationship to fracture fragments can be easily assessed.

Some limitations of this technique include the fact that MDCT has not been validated for the evaluation of tendinosis (tendinopathy) or longitudinal splitting of tendons. We have also observed that deep tendons such as the hamstring tendons and rotator cuff are difficult to visualize on 3D volume-rendered MDCT images.

In conclusion, we report 18 tendon abnormalities in 16 patients that were diagnosed on 3D volume-rendered images generated from MDCT data sets. Seven tendon abnormalities were confirmed surgically and one by MRI. Avulsions, partial tears, anomalous insertions, and dislocations of superficial tendons were easily detected on 3D volume-rendered MDCT images. To assess the accuracy of this technique and how it compares with MRI and sonography, larger studies are needed in which results from all three techniques are correlated with surgical or pathologic findings.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Helms CA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the foot and ankle. In: Brant WE, Helms CA, eds. Fundamentals of diagnostic radiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,1999 : 1099–1108
  2. Lin J, Fessell DP, Jacobson JA, Weadock WJ, Hayes CW. An illustrated tutorial of musculoskeletal sonography. 3. Lower extremity. AJR 2000; 175:1313 –1321[Free Full Text]
  3. Cody DD. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT—image processing in CT. RadioGraphics2002; 22:1255 –1268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pelc JS, Beaulieu CF. Volume rendering of tendon–bone relationships using unenhanced CT. AJR2001; 176:973 –977[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Fishman EK, Kuszyk B. 3D imaging: musculoskeletal applications. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging2001; 42:59 –100[Medline]
  6. Rubin GD, Napel S, Leung AN. Volumetric analysis of volumetric data: achieving a paradigm shift. Radiology1996; 200:312 –317[Free Full Text]
  7. Rosenberg ZS, Feldman F, Singson RD. Peroneal tendon injuries: CT analysis. Radiology 1986;161 : 743–748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rosenberg ZS, Feldman F, Singson RD, Price GJ. Peroneal tendon injury associated with calcaneal fractures: CT findings. AJR 1987;149:125 –129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rosenberg ZS, Feldman F, Singson RD, Kane R. Ankle tendons: evaluation with CT. Radiology1988; 166:221 –226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Rosenberg ZS, Jahss MH, Noto AM, et al. Rupture of the posterior tibial tendon: CT and surgical findings. Radiology1988; 167:489 –493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cheung Y, Rosenberg ZS, Magee T, Chinitz L. Normal anatomy and pathologic conditions of ankle tendons: current imaging techniques. RadioGraphics1992; 12:429 –444[Abstract]
  12. Mahesh M. Search for isotropic resolution in CT from conventional through multiple-row detector. RadioGraphics2002; 22:949 –962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J, Kopecky KK, Crow K, Yang EL. Musculoskeletal imaging with multislice CT. AJR2001; 176:979 –986[Free Full Text]
  14. Oden RR. Tendon injuries about the ankle resulting from skiing. Clin Orthop 1987:63 –69
  15. Bradley SA, Davies AM. Computed tomographic assessment of soft tissue abnormalities following calcaneal fractures. Br J Radiol 1992;65:105 –111[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Ohashi, J. M. Restrepo, G. Y. El-Khoury, and K. S. Berbaum
Peroneal Tendon Subluxation and Dislocation: Detection on Volume-rendered Images--Initial Experience
Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 252 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS