AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 182:337-340
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Arthrofibrosis Associated with Total Knee Arthroplasty: Gray-Scale and Power Doppler Sonographic Findings

Jens G. Boldt1,2, Urs K. Munzinger1, Marco Zanetti3 and Juerg Hodler3

1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Lenggstrasse 2, Zurich CH-8008, Switzerland.
2 Present address: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Vinzenz Hospital, Schloss Strasse 85, Düsseldorf D-40477, Germany.
3 Department of Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, Zürich CH-8008, Switzerland.

Received April 14, 2003; accepted after revision August 12, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to J. Hodler.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to determine gray-scale and power Doppler sonographic findings in patients with arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. From a consecutive cohort of more than 3,000 mobilebearing total knee arthroplasties, 44 cases (1.5%) with arthrofibrosis were identified, of which 38 were recruited for a clinical and sonographic investigation. A control group of 38 patients with a well-functioning total knee arthroplasty was matched. Synovial hypertrophy, presence of neovascularity, patellar tendon thickness, and extent of effusion were assessed.

RESULTS. Synovial membrane thickness was significantly (p < 0.001) increased in the arthrofibrosis group (medial, 3.4 mm; lateral, 3.0 mm; suprapatellar, 3.1 mm) when compared with the control group (medial, 2.0 mm; lateral, 2.0 mm; suprapatellar, 1.9 mm). When a cutoff of 3.0 mm was used, sonography had a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 82% for detecting arthrofibrosis. Neovascularity (rated as grades 0–3) of the synovial membrane and Hoffa's fat pad was significantly (p <= 0.003) more pronounced in the arthrofibrosis group (medial, 1.1; lateral, 1.2; suprapatellar, 1.0; Hoffa's fat pad, 1.1) than in the control group (medial, 0.1; lateral, 0.3; suprapatellar, 0.2; Hoffa's fat pad, 0.1). No significant difference was seen between study groups with regard to the amount of joint effusion at three locations and with regard to patellar tendon thickness.

CONCLUSION. Synovial membrane thickening and neovascularity are characteristic sonographic findings for the diagnosis of arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Chronic pain and stiffness occurring after total knee arthroplasty are frustrating for both the patient and the surgeon [1]. Such symptoms are often attributed to arthrofibrosis, a joint abnormality characterized by synovial hypertrophy and capsular thickening. The differential diagnosis includes infection, pigmented villonodular synovitis, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and complex regional pain syndrome. Arthrofibrosis has been treated with physiotherapy; long-term peridural anesthetics; knee manipulation under anesthesia; arthroscopic débridement; and open procedures, including revision surgery with exchange of prosthetic components [2]. The prevalence of arthrofibrosis after mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty appears to be variable, ranging from 1% to 17% [3]. To our knowledge, the sonographic appearance of arthrofibrotic total knee arthroplasty has not been described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine the gray-scale and power Doppler sonographic findings in patients with arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
The study population was recruited from a cohort of more than 3,000 mobile-bearing low contact stress (LCS knee, DePuy, Leeds, England) total knee arthroplasties that had been performed in one orthopedic hospital since 1988. The polyethylene bearing in this knee system allows free rotation without translational mobility. The component design of the LCS prosthesis and the surgical technique have remained unchanged during the past 24 years.

All patients with total knee arthroplasty performed at our department are routinely followed up clinically and with standard radiography after 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, and whenever complications occur.

Forty-nine knees (1.6%) were diagnosed with arthrofibrosis on the basis of the following criteria: reduced range of motion (maximal range of motion of < 80°, an extension deficit of > 10°, or a total range of motion of < 80°); knee pain with no known reasons; palpable synovial thickening; an interval of more than 12 months after the last surgical intervention (to exclude physiologic postoperative changes); and absence of infection, hemarthrosis, and extraarticular abnormalities (including deep vein thrombosis). Clinical and laboratory tests or joint aspiration was performed whenever appropriate. This assessment was performed by two experienced senior knee surgeons who each perform more than 250 knee arthroplasties per year.

Five of the 49 patients had died at the time of this investigation. Six patients could not be motivated to attend the follow-up examinations for personal reasons (n = 2), distance between home and the hospital (n = 2), illness not relating to total knee arthroplasty (n = 1), and revision surgery performed at another institution (n = 1). Therefore, 38 (86%) of the surviving 44 total knee arthroplasties were included in the study. The investigation was approved by the responsible institutional review board and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

The mean age of the patients with arthrofibrosis was 65 years (range, 49–76 years). The range of motion of the knees that underwent surgery was 40–80° (mean, 70°). The 38 knees had been treated by one to five manipulations (mean, 1.9 manipulations) with the patient under anesthesia at the time of follow-up. At least one surgical revision had been performed in 36 (95%) of the 38 knees, including open débridement in 26 (72%), arthroscopic débridement in 15 (42%), bearing exchange in six (17%), tibial component revision in four (11%), resurfacing of a primarily nonoperated patella in three (8%), repositioning of the tibial tuberosity in three (8%), and patellar component removal in one (3%) knee.

Control Subjects
A control group of 38 individuals with well-functioning LCS knee arthroplasties were matched with regard to age, sex, body mass index, and follow-up period. Inclusion criteria for the control group were range of motion of more than 100°, lack of peri- or postoperative complications, and excellent or good clinical results according to a published clinical knee arthroplasty score [4]. During a period of 8 months, all patients who were scheduled for a routine follow-up visit at least 1 year after surgery were invited to enter the control group until the appropriate number of the matched group was obtained. None of the eligible patients rejected study participation. The mean age of the control patients was 67 years (range, 54–77 years). Fourteen patients were men and 24 were women. The range of motion in the control group was 100–135° (mean, 115°). Age, sex, body mass index, diagnosis, and type of prosthesis were not significantly different in the arthrofibrosis and control groups.

Sonography
The patients were examined by one of two consultant musculoskeletal radiologists who have worked at the same institution for 8 years; both have more than 10 years of experience in sonography of the musculoskeletal systems. Before the start of the study, they examined a few patients not included in the investigation to make sure that the same imaging technique and image criteria were used. The radiologists were unaware of the patients' symptoms. The radiologists were asked not to talk to the patient about the knee during the examination but rather about technical aspects of sonography. The patients were placed in the supine position with the knees extended (90° flexion) for examination of the patellar ligament. A 7.5-MHz linear transducer on an Elegra scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) was used. Measurements were obtained during the examination with the electronic calipers of the sonographic equipment. The output on the screen (to the nearest 1/10 of a millimeter) was used for calculations. Such numbers probably overstate the precision of sonographic measurements but do not introduce a bias in favor of either patient group. For the power Doppler examinations, the color gain was adjusted until no color signal was present deep in relation to the cortical bone of the femoral condyle. The pulse repetition frequency was maintained at 1,250 Hz in all cases. Hard copies and digital (JPEG) images were obtained for documentation.

Synovial hypertrophy (in millimeters), neovascularity of synovial membrane and Hoffa's fat pad (grades 0–3), patellar tendon thickness (in millimeters), and the extent of effusion (in millimeters squared) were assessed. Synovial hypertrophy and neovascularity were separately assessed in the suprapatellar, medial, and lateral parapatellar recesses. When synovial thickness was variable in a specific compartment, the thickest part was measured. The amount of effusion was measured in the same three compartments. From the largest transverse (craniocaudal for the suprapatellar recess) and anteroposterior diameters, a cross-sectional area was calculated with the 2D ellipsoid formula ({pi} x a x b / 4, with a and b representing the two measured diameters). This is only an estimation of the amount of effusion. However, because of the complicated form of the synovial recesses, the true volume would have been complicated to calculate, presumably without changing the message. Neovascularity was graded as 0 for not detectable, 1 for minimal (one or two vessels visible in the field of view), 2 for moderate (three or more vessels in field of view, flow signal covering < 50% of the section even in the most vascularized parts of the synovial membrane), and 3 for prominent (three or more vessels in the field of view, flow signal covering > 50% of the section in the most vascularized parts of the synovial membrane). The same grading was used for vascularity of Hoffa's fat pad. The anteroposterior diameter of the patellar ligament was measured at mid distance between the patellar and tibial insertions.

Statistical Analysis
Continuous data in both groups were normally distributed (one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), and an unpaired Student's t test was performed. For the grading of neovascularity, Mann-Whitney tests were used. Significance was set at the 5% level.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Clinical Findings
The control group had a mean clinical score of 91.2 points (range, 81–100 points), and the arthrofibrosis group (Fig. 1) had a mean clinical score of 31.5 points (range, 15–51 points). Correcting osteotomy before total knee arthroplasty was a significant (p < 0.05) risk factor for developing arthrofibrosis in total knee arthroplasty with eight patients (18%) in the arthrofibrosis group versus one (3%) in the control group. In both groups, nine knees each had undergone arthroscopic meniscal surgery before total knee arthroplasty. This potential risk factor, therefore, appears not to be associated with arthrofibrosis. Other potential risk factors were rarely encountered. Therefore, their importance cannot be determined on the basis of our study. Three of 38 patients in the arthrofibrosis group had poliomyelitis affecting the lower limbs compared with no individual in the control group. An additional three patients in the arthrofibrosis group had previously undergone open reduction and internal fixation of an intraarticular fracture compared with no fracture in the control group.



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. 49-year-old man 28 months after total right knee arthroplasty. Photograph shows typical clinical appearance of arthrofibrosis, with diffuse swelling of knee. On examination, swelling is firm, not painful, and not fluctuating.

 

Sonography
Results are presented in Table 1. Synovial thickness was significantly increased in the arthrofibrosis group (Fig. 2) in comparison with the control group (Fig. 3). When a cutoff of 3.0 mm was used, sonography had a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 82% for detecting arthrofibrosis. Synovial membrane and Hoffa's fat pad hypervascularity were significantly more pronounced in the arthrofibrosis group than in the control group. Thirty-three knees had a vascularity of grade 2 or more (Fig. 2) in at least two regions versus three in the control group (Fig. 3). Differences with regard to joint effusion and patellar tendon thickness were not significant. A significantly (p < 0.04) increased synovial thickness (mean, 3.5 mm) was seen in patients who had previously been treated with open débridement compared with those with previous arthroscopic débridement (mean, 2.9 mm). However, neovascularity of the synovial membrane was not significantly different for these two groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Comparison of Normal and Arthrofibrotic Knees After Arthroplasty

 


View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. 58-year-old woman 26 months after total right knee arthroplasty. Sonography shows increased synovial hypertrophy associated with arthrofibrosis. Transverse power Doppler sonogram through medial parapatellar recess of right knee shows prominent (grade 3) neovascularity (curved arrow) in ventral and medial parts of thickened synovial membrane (between straight arrows). F = femoral condyle.

 


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. 69-year-old man in control group who has well-functioning knee replacement 25 months after total right knee arthroplasty. Transverse sonogram through medial parapatellar recess of right knee shows normal thickness of synovial membrane (arrow points to anterior synovial membrane, calipers measure anterior [x – x] and posterior [+ – +] synovial membranes). F = femoral condyle.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Arthrofibrosis is a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty that requires revision surgery in as many as 17% of cases [3]. Arthrofibrosis is clinically characterized by serious functional impairment, pain, and considerable patient dissatisfaction. Arthrofibrosis responds poorly to treatment, which may include physiotherapy; long-term peridural anesthesia (<= 2 weeks); closed manipulation; arthroscopic débridement; and open procedures, including revision surgery with exchange of prosthetic components. The etiology of arthrofibrosis is a subject of debate. Biochemical and immunologic factors, genetically determined predisposition, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, complex regional pain syndrome, metal-related allergy, lowgrade infection, and mechanical factors have been discussed [1, 58]. Histopathologic analysis has shown massive connective tissue proliferation with deposition of disordered matrix proteins and increased expression of type VI collagen in the subsynovia as well as around capillary walls [68].

According to our data, sonography can differentiate total knee arthroplasty patients with arthrofibrosis from those with an uncomplicated postoperative course on the basis of synovial membrane thickness and neovascularity. Therefore, sonography may be useful in the assessment of the postoperative knee. Previously published papers have not focused on the specific diagnosis of arthrofibrosis but support the potential role of postoperative sonography. Grobbelaar et al. [9] have emphasized both the economic and diagnostic potential of power Doppler sonography in assessing synovial structures. Giovagnorio et al. [10] have shown that power Doppler sonography of the knee is useful for identification of synovial thickening and hypervascularity and that it differentiates joint capsule from synovial membrane and effusion. Sonography has also been used for the qualitative assessment, grading, and follow-up of a number of synovial and other joint abnormalities [1119].

We acknowledge that the precision and reproducibility of the sonographic measurements and gradings have not been assessed. We believe, however, that any errors would be identical for both groups of patients and would not change our conclusions. At the institution of the orthopedic coauthors, sonography is used for surgical planning in patients with arthrofibrosis. The amount, diameter, and localization of hypertrophic tissues in the knee are relevant when deciding whether to perform open versus arthroscopic surgery. In addition, because synovial and capsular tissue cannot easily be differentiated intraoperatively, sonography assists in tissue-sparing synovectomy, thereby avoiding injury to capsular tissue.

In conclusion, synovial membrane thickening and neovascularity are characteristic sonographic findings for the diagnosis of arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Ries MD, Badalamente M. Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop2000; 380:177 –183
  2. Lindenfeld TN, Wojtys EM, Husain A. Surgical treatment of arthrofibrosis of the knee. Instr Course Lect2000; 49:211 –221[Medline]
  3. Kaper BP, Smith PN, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Robertson D. Medium-term results of a mobile bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop1999; 367:201 –209
  4. Buechel FF. A simplified evaluation system for the rating of the knee function. Orthop Rev1982; 11:97 –101
  5. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Walker SA, Cheal EJ, Stiehl JB. Femoral condylar lift-off in vivo in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:33 –39
  6. Zeichen J, van Griensven M, Albers I, Lobenhoffer P, Bosch U. Immunohistochemical localization of collagen VI in arthrofibrosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg1999; 119:315 –318
  7. Delcogliano A, Franzese S, Branca A, Magi M, Fabbriciani C. Light and scan electron microscopic analysis of cyclops syndrome: etiopathogenic hypothesis and technical solutions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1996;4:194 –199[Medline]
  8. Romanos G, Schroter-Kermani C, Hinz N, Bernimoulin JP. Immunohistochemical distribution of the collagen types IV, V, VI and glycoprotein laminin in the healthy rat, marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) and human gingivae. Matrix1991; 11:125 –132[Medline]
  9. Grobbelaar N, Bouffard JA. Ultrasonography of the knee: a pictorial review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR2000; 21:231 –274[Medline]
  10. Giovagnorio F, Martinoli C, Coari G. Power Doppler ultrasonography in knee arthritis: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int2001; 20:101 –104[Medline]
  11. Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, Radke S, Faehndrich TP, Gohlke F. Correlation of power Doppler ultrasonography with vascularity of the synovial tissue of the knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum2001; 44:331 –338[Medline]
  12. Rasmussen OS. Ultrasonography of tendons. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2000;10:360 –364[Medline]
  13. Schmidt WA, Volker L, Zacher J, Schlafke M, Ruhnke M, Gromnica-Ihle E. Colour Doppler ultrasonography to detect pannus in knee joint synovitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol2000; 18:439 –444[Medline]
  14. Troltzsch M. Color Doppler study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and scleroderma [in German]. Z Rheumatol1994; 53:2 –6[Medline]
  15. Gratz S, Gobel D, Behr TM, Herrmann A, Becker W. Correlation between radiation dose, synovial thickness, and efficacy of radiosynoviorthesis. J Rheumatol1999; 26:1242 –1249[Medline]
  16. Gray SD, Kaplan PA, Dussault RG. Imaging of the knee: current status. Orthop Clin North Am1997; 28:643 –658[Medline]
  17. Starok M, Lenchik L, Trudell D, Resnick D. Normal patellar retinaculum: MR and sonographic imaging with cadaveric correlation. AJR 1997;168:1493 –1499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Fiocco U, Cozzi L, Rubaltelli L, et al. Long-term ultrasonographic follow-up of rheumatoid and psoriatic proliferative knee joint synovitis. J Rheumatol1996; 35:155 –163
  19. Rubaltelli L, Fiocco U, Cozzi L, et al. Prospective ultrasonographic and arthroscopic evaluation of proliferative knee joint synovitis. J Ultrasound Med1994; 13:855 –862[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS