AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:1033-1037
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Changing Role of Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Adrenal Masses: Evaluation of 50 Adrenal Biopsies

Sean D. Paulsen1, Hanh V. Nghiem, Melvyn Korobkin, Elaine M. Caoili and Ellen J. Higgins

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., UH B1 D530, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

Received May 28, 2003; accepted after revision October 28, 2003.

 
Presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society, San Diego, CA.

Address correspondence to H. V. Nghiem.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Prior series of percutaneous imaging-guided biopsies of adrenal masses before the advent of dedicated CT and MRI of the adrenal glands have shown that 40–57% of adrenal masses biopsied were adenomas—benign lesions requiring no further evaluation or treatment. This study was performed to assess the effect of dedicated adrenal imaging with CT and MRI on the rate of percutaneous imaging-guided biopsies of adrenal masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed 50 consecutive adrenal mass biopsies performed during a 48-month period. The patient demographics, technique of biopsy, pathology results, and results of any prior dedicated adrenal imaging with MRI or CT protocols were noted.

RESULTS. Only six (12%) of 50 biopsies were adenomas. Five of these six cases were preceded by dedicated adrenal CT or MRI. Thirty-five cases were metastatic disease, four were adrenal cortical carcinoma, three were pheochromocytoma, and two biopsies were nondiagnostic. Overall, 20 of 50 cases were preceded by a dedicated adrenal CT or MRI examination to exclude an adenoma; in 21 of the remaining 30 cases, the imaging characteristics before biopsy were inconsistent with the potential diagnosis of an adenoma and dedicated adrenal CT or MRI was not recommended.

CONCLUSION. The number of adrenal adenomas biopsied has declined markedly with the introduction of dedicated adrenal CT and MRI for adrenal adenomas. Percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy is useful in confirming the presence and nature of suspected metastatic deposits to the adrenal gland and in diagnosing or excluding adrenal adenomas in patients with equivocal imaging characteristics.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Imaging-guided percutaneous adrenal biopsy is generally considered a safe procedure and has proven useful for characterization of lesions identified in the adrenal glands on cross-sectional imaging, especially in the evaluation of possible metastatic deposits. However, even in patients with known primary tumors, a significant number, perhaps even most, of adrenal masses are nonfunctioning benign adenomas [1, 2], which require no further intervention or treatment. Four case series published before 1996 showed that among patients referred for percutaneous adrenal biopsy, 40–57% of biopsied lesions consisted of benign adrenal masses, most of which were adenomas [36].

The past decade has seen technical advances in specialized CT and MRI protocols, allowing more accurate and more specific noninvasive characterization of lesions of the adrenal gland, particularly benign adenomas. Application of these techniques has the potential to reduce the number of benign lesions biopsied, yielding a more rapid diagnosis while avoiding the risks of biopsy. This series was undertaken to evaluate the effect of dedicated adrenal CT and chemical shift MRI on the rate of biopsy of adrenal adenomas at a large academic medical center.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This study was approved by our institutional review board. We retrospectively reviewed 50 consecutive adrenal mass biopsies performed during a 48-month period (November 1998–October 2002) at our institution, a tertiary care academic medical center with a large oncology referral base. These biopsies were performed in 50 patients, all of whom were undergoing staging evaluation for a known or suspected extraadrenal malignancy. No identified patients who underwent adrenal biopsy during this time were excluded from evaluation. Patient medical records were reviewed for all reported information related to the adrenal biopsy procedure, including technique used, approach taken, needle selected, and any immediate complications. Imaging results before biopsy, including the results of any dedicated adrenal imaging with CT or MRI, were noted. Mean and median mass size were calculated for all masses in the study as well as for those biopsied with CT and sonographic guidance, using the maximum reported axial diameter. In three cases, no specific measurement was reported; the maximum axial measurement was retrospectively assessed. Other information reviewed included the indication for the procedure; pertinent clinical history, including discussions before biopsy with referring clinicians for indicators of possible pheochromocytoma; the results of laboratory investigations, including pre- and postbiopsy biochemical testing for pheochromocytoma; and pathology results.

The choice of CT or sonographic guidance was made by the radiologist. Local anesthesia with lidocaine was routinely used. Patients commonly received IV conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl, with hemodynamic and oximetric monitoring, at the discretion of the radiologist. In cases of fine-needle aspiration, the cytopathologist reviewed the samples at the time of biopsy. Fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy samples were sent to the pathology department for review. Patients were monitored in a recovery area after the biopsy procedure, typically for 4 hr, before discharge.

Histopathologic results are grouped into five main categories: benign adrenal tissue, which includes adrenal cortical adenomas and samples with benign- or normal-appearing adrenal cortical cells; metastases; adrenal cortical carcinoma; pheochromocytoma; and nondiagnostic, which includes any samples containing only skeletal muscle, nerve tissue, adipocytes, or hepatocytes without normal adrenal or neoplastic tissue.

Current practice at our institution for characterizing an adrenal mass as an adenoma using imaging includes the use of both CT [7] and MRI [8] as described in the following text. Using unenhanced CT, attenuation values of 10 H or less are considered diagnostic for a lipid-rich adenoma. For masses with higher attenuation values on unenhanced CT, contrast-enhanced CT is performed with attenuation values calculated at 60 sec and 15 min after injection. A percentage of washout is calculated according to the formula: (attenuation value at enhanced CT – attenuation value at delayed enhanced CT) / (attenuation value at enhanced CT – attenuation value at unenhanced CT) x 100. A percentage of washout equal to or greater than a threshold value of 60% is considered diagnostic of adenoma.

For evaluation of adrenal masses with MRI, we rely on chemical shift imaging. Opposed phase imaging is performed with a 1.5-T magnet using a T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence. In-phase sequences use a TR range of 68–160 msec (based on the patient's ability to breath-hold) and a TE range of 4.2–4.9; opposed phase images are obtained with a similar TR and a TE of 2.1–2.9 sec. The characterization of a lesion as an adenoma relies on the qualitative visual assessment of a decreased relative signal intensity on opposed phase images, which indicates the presence of lipid.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Adrenal biopsies were performed in 30 men and 20 women who ranged in age from 26 to 86 years. Overall, 26 left and 24 right adrenal masses having a mean mass size of 4.9 cm (range, 1.5–16 cm; median, 3.5 cm) were sampled. Forty-one biopsies were performed under CT guidance on adrenal masses having a mean mass size of 3.8 cm (range, 1.5–12 cm; median, 3.0 cm). Nine biopsies were performed under sonographic guidance on adrenal masses having a mean mass size of 9.8 cm (range, 4.9–16.0 cm; median, 10.0 cm). Of the cases using sonographic guidance, three left and six right adrenal masses were biopsied using a variety of anterior and posterior approaches. Overall, three cases used fine-needle aspiration only, with three additional cases using both fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy techniques; five of the six cases using fine-needle aspiration occurred within the first 9 months of the study period, before August 1999. The sixth procedure, using both fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy, took place in August 2000. The remaining 44 samples were obtained as core biopsies only. Needle size varied from 16- to 22-gauge, with most biopsies performed with a 17-gauge introducer needle and an 18-gauge biopsy needle. For core biopsies, common practice at our institution is to obtain three core samples, with additional samples obtained at the discretion of the radiologist on the basis of a subjective assessment of sample adequacy. No immediate complication of any biopsy procedure was noted.

Histopathology Results
A diagnostic result, either benign or neoplastic adrenal or metastatic tumor tissue, was obtained in 48 (96%) of the 50 biopsies (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Histopathology Results

 

Metastatic lesions.—At histopathology review, 35 of 50 biopsy samples were consistent with metastasis from an extraadrenal primary neoplasm. The mean mass size of the metastatic deposits was 4.4 cm (median, 3.5 cm; range, 1.5–12 cm). Twenty-two (63%) of these 35 cases were from primary lung neoplasms. Another nine lesions represented adrenal metastases from a variety of identified primary malignancies, including three esophageal neoplasms, two renal neoplasms, one sarcoma, one melanoma, one lymphoma, and one pancreatic neoplasm. Three more lesions represented metastases from unknown primary tumors. In the remaining case, review of the biopsy sample was consistent with a leiomyosarcoma; however, after surgical resection, this retroperitoneal metastatic deposit did not involve the adjacent normal adrenal gland tissue.

Fourteen of these 35 cases of adrenal metastases were preceded by adrenal-protocol CT or MRI that did not indicate a likely adenoma. Of the remaining 21 cases, only six having a size range of 1.9–6.6 cm were candidates for dedicated adrenal imaging on the basis of predominantly homogeneous enhancement at routine CT. In two of these six cases, adrenal-protocol CT was recommended but not performed. In another two of these six cases, positron emission tomography (PET) before biopsy revealed findings suspicious for probable adrenal metastases, and these patients were referred for adrenal biopsy. The remaining 15 metastatic masses showed heterogeneous enhancement, making an imaging-based diagnosis of an adenoma unlikely.

Overall, five of 35 metastatic adrenal masses were evaluated with PET before biopsy, with increased glycolytic activity consistent with metastasis in each case.

Benign adrenal tissue.—Of the 50 adrenal masses, only six (12%) were consistent with benign adrenal tissue after histopathology review. The mean mass size of these lesions was 3.3 cm (range, 2.2–4.9 cm). All six patients had a known extraadrenal primary malignancy, including three esophageal neoplasms and one each of breast, lung, and renal cell carcinoma.

Five of these six cases were preceded by dedicated adrenal-protocol CT (n = 4) or MRI (n = 1). Three masses were inconclusive for the presence of an adenoma, including two that were evaluated with adrenal-protocol CT, which was not diagnostic for an adenoma in either case. The first mass had an unenhanced attenuation value of 15 H and a percentage of enhancement washout of 52% (Fig. 1A, 1B). The second mass had an unenhanced attenuation value of 54 H; after contrast administration, the mass showed heterogeneous peripheral enhancement, precluding calculation of a percentage of enhancement washout value. The third mass, evaluated by chemical shift MRI, had imaging characteristics of a hemorrhagic mass lacking fat on in- and out-of-phase imaging. A fourth case, involving both left and right adrenal masses with calcifications in a patient with esophageal cancer, was evaluated on CT and showed unenhanced values of 4 and 11 H with percentage of enhancement washout values of 59% and 71%, respectively, which were supportive of the diagnosis of adenoma with areas of dystrophic calcification (Fig. 2A, 2B). PET evaluation of these masses showed subtle glycolytic activity, which was much less than the activity at the primary tumor site. The fifth case was evaluated on CT and reported as inconclusive for the presence of an adenoma on the basis of a percentage of enhancement washout value of 54%. In retrospect, the percentage of enhancement washout value was incorrectly calculated; had the calculation been performed correctly, a diagnosis of adenoma could have been made on the basis of a washout value of 63%. The sixth benign adrenal mass measured 3.5 cm and had a homogeneous appearance; although adrenal-protocol CT was recommended, the case was referred directly to biopsy.



View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. Adrenal CT in 71-year-old man with biopsy-proven 2.5-cm adenoma in left adrenal gland. Unenhanced CT scan shows left adrenal mass (arrow) with attenuation value of 15 H.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. Adrenal CT in 71-year-old man with biopsy-proven 2.5-cm adenoma in left adrenal gland. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows homogeneous enhancement of left adrenal mass (arrow). Calculated percentage of enhancement washout value after contrast administration was 52%, not diagnostic for adenoma. Biopsy established diagnosis of adenoma.

 


View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. Bilateral adrenal adenomas containing dystrophic calcifications in 80-year-old man with history of esophageal cancer. Unenhanced CT scan of right adrenal mass (arrow) shows coarse calcifications.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. Bilateral adrenal adenomas containing dystrophic calcifications in 80-year-old man with history of esophageal cancer. Unenhanced CT scan of left adrenal mass (arrow) shows several scattered small calcifications. Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced washout values of both right and left adrenal masses were supportive of diagnoses of adenomas. However, because of presence of calcifications and mild uptake at PET, biopsy was performed and showed left mass to be adrenal adenoma.

 

Three of the benign masses were stable on follow-up CT at 3, 16, and 23 months. One mass was confirmed to be benign after surgical resection. Two of the six patients with benign biopsy findings were lost to follow-up.

Adrenal cortical carcinoma.—Four primary adrenal cortical carcinomas having a mean mass size of 12.9 cm (range, 10–16 cm) were biopsied under sonographic guidance using a core biopsy technique. Two masses were positively identified as adrenal cortical carcinomas during histopathology review of the biopsy samples. Of these two masses, the diagnosis was later confirmed after surgical removal in one case; the second patient was not a surgical candidate. The two remaining masses had nonspecific pathology results, showing a poorly differentiated malignant neoplasm without features of lymphoma in one case and an extensively necrotic neoplasm suggestive of carcinoma in the other. These two masses were presumed to be adrenal cortical carcinomas on the basis of their location, centered in the adrenal bed, hypoattenuating centers, unilaterality, adjacent organ displacement or invasion, negative workup for an extraadrenal primary malignancy, and large size (14.5 and 16 cm). Both masses were deemed inoperable, and these patients were treated with palliative care only.

Pheochromocytoma.—Three of 50 adrenal masses were pheochromocytomas measuring 2.5, 3.5, and 7.0 cm (mean, 4.3 cm). Each of these was a unilateral, heterogeneous mass. The two smaller lesions were biopsied using CT guidance and the largest, using sonographic guidance, all as core biopsies. No immediate complications were associated with any of the biopsies.

All three pheochromocytomas were unsuspected clinically before biopsy because they occurred in patients with suspected extraadrenal sites of malignancy. One patient underwent an evaluation of urine catecholamine levels with normal results before biopsy at the recommendation of the radiologist. Before biopsy, this same patient also underwent adrenal-protocol CT that showed the mass to have an attenuation value of 28 H unenhanced and marked heterogeneity after the administration of contrast material, precluding the calculation of washout values. No further workup or treatment for pheochromocytoma was pursued at our institution in this patient.

The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in the remaining two patients by elevated levels of urine catecholamines drawn after the biopsy results were available and by surgical resection of the tumor in both patients.

Nondiagnostic biopsies.—The remaining two of 50 biopsy samples contained only benign-appearing nonadrenal skeletal muscle, nerve, and adipose tissue. Both biopsies, which were of left and right adrenal masses measuring 3.0 cm and 2.3 cm, respectively, were performed using CT guidance in patients with lung cancer. Neither of these masses underwent repeated biopsy; both patients were treated for presumed metastatic disease. One patient died with cerebral metastases and the other died with enlarging, bilateral adrenal metastases.

Adrenal Imaging
Overall, in 20 (40%) of 50 cases, dedicated adrenal CT (n = 19) or MRI (n = 1) was performed before biopsy. In only one case was the interpretation of the adrenal imaging potentially supportive of the diagnosis of adenoma. These 20 studies included 14 cases of metastatic disease, five cases of benign adrenal tissue, and one pheochromocytoma.

Thirty cases did not undergo dedicated adrenal imaging before biopsy. In 21 of these 30 cases, the masses showed primarily heterogeneous enhancement on routine CT, a finding inconsistent with a diagnosis of adenoma. In these cases, biopsy was required for further evaluation.

In the remaining nine of 30 cases without dedicated adrenal imaging, the masses showed predominantly homogeneous enhancement on routine CT and a dedicated adrenal study could have been considered before biopsy. These nine masses averaged 3.3 cm in size (range, 1.9–6.6 cm; median, 2.7 cm). A dedicated adrenal study had in fact been recommended in four of these nine masses (one case of adenoma, one nondiagnostic biopsy, and two cases of metastasis). Two of these nine masses were evaluated before biopsy with PET, which showed adrenal uptake consistent with metastases.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Adrenal masses are commonly discovered during CT of the abdomen in patients with a known or suspected extraadrenal primary malignancy. Percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy of adrenal masses is most often performed to evaluate the presence of metastatic disease to the adrenal gland in such patients.

Because of the high prevalence of adrenal adenomas, which are seen in as many as 5% of patients undergoing CT [1] and in 2–8% of autopsies [9], this entity is the primary differential diagnostic consideration for suspected adrenal metastatic disease. In prior published series of percutaneous adrenal biopsies, benign adrenal tissue, including adenomas, accounted for about half of the masses biopsied. In a series of 83 consecutive adrenal masses biopsied at our institution before the application of dedicated adrenal imaging protocols, 47 (57%) were consistent with benign adenomas [5]. In comparison, Silverman et al. [3] reported that 53 (52%) of 101 biopsies performed in known oncology patients and in patients with incidentally discovered adrenal masses were benign. Bernardino et al. [6] analyzed adrenal biopsies in 53 consecutive patients, including 39 known oncology patients, and found 28 benign masses (53%). Welch et al. [4] noted a slightly lower rate of benign biopsy findings of 40% (59/147 patients), although this group included only patients with a known diagnosis of lung cancer.

Previously reported dedicated adrenal CT and chemical shift MRI protocols to evaluate adrenal masses for characteristics specific to adrenal adenomas were in use at our institution during the time of this study. Such protocols have been shown to have a sensitivity and specificity of more than 95% and near 80%, respectively, for MRI [1], and 98% and 92%, respectively, for CT [7]. Application of these protocols before referral for percutaneous adrenal biopsy has significantly reduced the numbers of adrenal adenomas biopsied, thus obviating a needless procedure. Of 50 masses in this series, only six (12%) represented benign adrenal tissue. This rate compares favorably with that in a recently published large series of 225 patients with biopsy-proven extraadrenal malignancies [10] who underwent adrenal biopsy after an indeterminate result on unenhanced CT, dedicated adrenal CT, or in- and out-of-phase MRI. In that series, 41 biopsies (18%) were negative for metastases.

As with prior series, metastases to the adrenal gland were the most frequently identified adrenal mass at biopsy, with most of these from primary lung cancer. Five of 35 cases of proven adrenal metastases were also evaluated with PET before biopsy, with a concordant result. Although the role of PET in evaluating adrenal masses has not yet been established, several investigators suggest it may exhibit high sensitivity for identifying malignant masses [1114].

Although adrenal adenomas are the most common primary adrenal neoplasm, up to 50% of adrenal cortical carcinomas may be nonfunctioning and present a radiologic and histopathologic appearance that is similar to the appearance of large, degenerated adrenal adenomas, which necessitates surgical resection for differentiation [15, 16]. Biopsy is considered relatively contraindicated in cases of potential adrenal cortical carcinoma because of the risk of seeding of the biopsy tract with tumor and difficulties in histopathologic differentiation between a degenerated adenoma and an adrenal cortical carcinoma [1]. Only one of four presumed adrenal cortical carcinomas in our study was surgically resected; the remaining three tumors were inoperable.

Functioning tumors of the adrenal gland, such as pheochromocytomas, do not require biopsy for diagnosis. In the case of pheochromocytoma, biopsy is actually contraindicated because manipulation of these tumors carries a risk of hemodynamic instability [17] by stimulating catecholamine secretion. Although the incidence of morbidity related to percutaneous biopsy of pheochromocytoma is not known, transient headache [18]; labile blood pressures [19, 20]; and abdominal pain, hemodynamic instability, and uncontrolled hemorrhage, leading to eventual death [21] have all been described. The relationship between the severity of the prebiopsy clinical manifestations of the tumor and the rate or severity of complications during or after biopsy is unknown; however, several case reports suggest that the surgical risk for patients with asymptomatic, incidentally discovered pheochromocytomas may be the same as for patients manifesting more severe symptoms [22, 23]. We are aware of only a single case report of a nonsecreting pheochromocytoma [24]. Each biopsy performed of a pheochromocytoma places the patient at risk for serious complications.

Because pheochromocytoma has no specific imaging features, the diagnosis is based on clinical suspicion with confirmatory testing via a 24-hr urine collection for catecholamines and their break-down products or serum catecholamines. Although pheochromocytoma classically presents with episodic hypertension, headache, and palpitations, 14% of patients with pheochromocytoma may present with atypical features [19]; in some cases the diagnosis may be unsuspected clinically. Although pheochromocytoma is a rare tumor found in fewer than 1% of hypertensive patients and in 0.13% of autopsies [25], a significant but widely varying reported percentage (5.5–80%) of documented pheochromocytomas may be clinically unsuspected before discovery [26]. Pheochromocytomas have also been reported in 3.4% of incidentally discovered adrenal masses [27].

The role of screening for a possible pheochromocytoma before biopsy is unclear. Such testing is costly, requires patient compliance in obtaining a 24-hr urine collection, and leads to a delay in diagnosis while awaiting results of tests that are often performed at infrequent intervals. Although in patients with clinically suspected pheochromocytomas the sensitivity of such testing may approach 100% [28], the yield in screening a population of patients referred for adrenal biopsy is unknown. Casola et al. [19] reported two of four cases of clinically unsuspected pheochromocytoma with normal catecholamine levels before biopsy. Similarly, we report one case of pheochromocytoma in which urine catecholamine levels obtained before biopsy were within the normal range.

Our preference is to screen for pheochromocytoma before adrenal biopsy in all patients with an adrenal mass to avoid possible adverse effects. At a minimum, we require screening in all patients whose clinical history suggests even the remote possibility of pheochromocytoma. Fortunately, all three cases of pheochromocytoma reported in our series remained clinically occult during and after biopsy; no complications were noted during resection in the two patients who proceeded to surgery.

Our rate of nondiagnostic biopsies was 4%. This rate compares favorably to reported rates in the literature, which are 6–17% [36]. Patients with a nondiagnostic biopsy result should have the biopsy repeated; in our study, although neither nondiagnostic biopsy was repeated at the referring clinician's discretion, both patients later showed evidence of progressive metastatic disease.

In conclusion, the introduction of dedicated adrenal imaging has markedly reduced the rate of biopsy of benign adrenal adenomas. Percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy of the adrenal gland remains useful in confirming the presence and nature of metastatic deposits to the adrenal gland, as well as diagnosing or excluding potential adrenal adenomas in patients in whom an adrenal imaging study does not suggest an adenoma.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Korobkin M, Francis IR, Kloos RT, Dunnick NR. The incidental adrenal mass. Radiol Clin North Am1996; 34:1037 –1054[Medline]
  2. Oliver TW Jr, Bernardino ME, Miller JI, Mansour K, Greene D, Davis WA. Isolated adrenal masses in nonsmall-cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Radiology1994; 193:341 –344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Silverman SG, Mueller PR, Pinkney LP, Koenker RM, Seltzer SE. Predictive value of image-guided adrenal biopsy: analysis of results of 101 biopsies. Radiology1993; 187:715 –718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Welch TJ, Sheedy PF, Stephens DH, Johnson CM, Swensen SJ. Percutaneous adrenal biopsy: review of a 10-year experience. Radiology1994; 193:341 –344
  5. Mody MK, Kazerooni EA, Korobkin M. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of adrenal masses: immediate and delayed complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:434 –439[Medline]
  6. Bernardino ME, Walther MM, Phillips VM, et al. CT-guided adrenal biopsy: accuracy, safety, and indications. AJR1985; 144:67 –69[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, et al. Adrenal masses: characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. Radiology2002; 222:629 –633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Korobkin M, Lombardi TJ, Aisen AM, et al. Characterization of adrenal masses with chemical shift and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology1995; 197:411 –418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kenney PJ, Lee KT. The adrenals. Computed body tomography with MRI correlation, vol. 2, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1998:1190
  10. Harisinghani MG, Maher MM, Hahn PF, et al. Predictive value of benign percutaneous adrenal biopsies in oncology patients. Clin Radiol 2002;57:898 –901[Medline]
  11. Boland GW, Goldberg MA, Lee MJ, et al. Indeterminate adrenal mass in patients with cancer: evaluation at PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology1995; 194:131 –134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Erasmus JJ, Patz EF Jr, McAdams HP, et al. Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. AJR 1997;168:1357 –1360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Maurea S, Mainolfi C, Bazzicalupo L, et al. Imaging of adrenal tumors using FDG PET: comparison of benign and malignant lesions. AJR 1999;173:25 –29[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Yun M, Kim W, Alnafisi N, Lacorte L, Jang S, Alavi A. 18F-FDG PET in characterizing adrenal lesions detected on CT or MRI. J Nucl Med2001; 42:1795 –1799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Newhouse JH, Heffess CS, Wagner BJ, Imray TJ, Adair CF, Davidson AJ. Large degenerated adrenal adenomas: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Radiology1999; 210:385 –391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sasano H, Suzuki T, Moriya T. Discerning malignancy in resected adrenocortical neoplasms. Endocr Pathol2001; 12:397 –406[Medline]
  17. Thomas JL, Bernardino ME, Samaan NA, Hickey RC. CT of pheochromocytoma. AJR1980; 135:477 –482[Abstract]
  18. Lambert MA, Hirschowitz L, Russell RC. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a cautionary tale. Br J Surg1985; 72:364[Medline]
  19. Casola G, Nicolet V, vanSonnenberg E, et al. Unsuspected pheochromocytoma: risk of blood-pressure alterations during percutaneous adrenal biopsy. Radiology1986; 159:733 –735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Baguet JP, Hammer L, Tremel F, Mangin L, Mallion JM. Metastatic phaeochromocytoma: risks of diagnostic needle puncture and treatment by arterial embolisation. J Hum Hypertens2001; 15:209 –11[Medline]
  21. McCorkell SJ, Niles NL. Fine-needle aspiration of catecholamine-producing adrenal masses: a possibly fatal mistake. AJR 1985;145:113 –114[Free Full Text]
  22. Mijajima A, Nakashima J, Baba S, Tachibana M, Nakamura K, Murai M. Clinical experience with incidentally discovered pheochromocytoma. J Urol 1997;157:1566 –1568[Medline]
  23. Naruse T, Koike A, Kanemitsu T, et al. Pheochromocytoma without specific symptoms. Jpn J Surg1984; 14:239 –243[Medline]
  24. Mannelli M, Pupilli C, Lanzillotti R, et al. A non-secreting pheochromocytoma presenting as an incidental adrenal mass: report on a case. J Endocrinol Invest1993; 16:817 –822[Medline]
  25. Sutton MG, Sheps SG, Lie JT. Prevalence of clinically unsuspected pheochromocytoma: review of a 50-year autopsy series. Mayo Clin Proc 1981;56:354 –360[Medline]
  26. Krane NK. Clinically unsuspected pheochromocytomas: experience at Henry Ford Hospital and a review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 1986;146:54 –57[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Angeli A, Osella G, Ali A, Terzolo M. Adrenal incidentaloma: an overview of clinical and epidemiological data from the National Italian Study Group. Horm Res1997; 47:279 –283[Medline]
  28. Witteles RM, Kaplan EL, Roizen MF. Sensitivity of diagnostic and localization tests for pheochromocytoma in clinical practice. Arch Int Med 2000;160:2521 –2524

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
P. J. Mazzaglia and J. M. Monchik
Limited Value of Adrenal Biopsy in the Evaluation of Adrenal Neoplasm: A Decade of Experience
Arch Surg, May 1, 2009; 144(5): 465 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. W. L. Boland, M. A. Blake, P. F. Hahn, and W. W. Mayo-Smith
Incidental Adrenal Lesions: Principles, Techniques, and Algorithms for Imaging Characterization
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 756 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Friedrich-Rust, G. Schneider, R. M. Bohle, E. Herrmann, C. Sarrazin, S. Zeuzem, and J. Bojunga
Contrast-Enhanced Sonography of Adrenal Masses: Differentiation of Adenomas and Nonadenomatous Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1852 - 1860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Vikram, H. D. W. Yeung, H. A. Macapinlac, and R. B. Iyer
Utility of PET/CT in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Adrenal Nodules in Patients with Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1545 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Song, F. S. Chaudhry, and W. W. Mayo-Smith
The Incidental Adrenal Mass on CT: Prevalence of Adrenal Disease in 1,049 Consecutive Adrenal Masses in Patients with No Known Malignancy
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1163 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. M. DeWitt
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Right Adrenal Masses: Report of 2 Cases
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2008; 27(2): 261 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. F. Faria, S. M. Goldman, J. Szejnfeld, H. Melo, C. Kater, P. Kenney, M. P. Huayllas, G. Demarchi, V. V. Francisco, C. Andreoni, et al.
Adrenal Masses: Characterization with in Vivo Proton MR Spectroscopy Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 788 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Song, F. S. Chaudhry, and W. W. Mayo-Smith
The Incidental Indeterminate Adrenal Mass on CT (> 10 H) in Patients Without Cancer: Is Further Imaging Necessary? Follow-Up of 321 Consecutive Indeterminate Adrenal Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1119 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Blake, J. M. A. Slattery, M. K. Kalra, E. F. Halpern, A. J. Fischman, P. R. Mueller, and G. W. Boland
Adrenal Lesions: Characterization with Fused PET/CT Image in Patients with Proved or Suspected Malignancy--Initial Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 970 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS