AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Desjardins, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kazerooni, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Desjardins, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kazerooni, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:993-1010
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Review

ECG-Gated Cardiac CT

Benoit Desjardins1 and Ella A. Kazerooni

1 Both authors: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., TC-2910A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0326.

Received May 5, 2003; accepted after revision October 21, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to B. Desjardins.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death in the United States and the leading cause of premature permanent disability [1]. The latest statistics from the American Heart Association indicate that in 2003, more than 1 million Americans experienced an acute coronary event, more than half a million died from coronary artery disease, and more than 12 million had a history of symptomatic coronary artery disease. Total cost in the United States to diagnose and treat coronary artery disease is nearly $115 billion annually [1].

The definitive diagnosis of coronary artery disease is made by catheter coronary angiography, an invasive and expensive procedure with associated morbidity and mortality [2]. Therefore, catheter coronary angiography is often used as second-line diagnostic test after noninvasive diagnostic procedures, such as a treadmill exercise tolerance test, that provide indirect evidence of coronary artery stenosis [3]. In the past few years, progress has been made in the development of noninvasive diagnostic alternatives to directly image the coronary arteries. The two most promising noninvasive approaches are CT and MR coronary angiography.

This review describes the state of the art in cardiac imaging with CT, with emphasis on coronary artery imaging. After a more detailed description of the two principal CT technologies used in cardiac imaging—electron beam CT and MDCT—the technical aspects of ECG-gated cardiac MDCT are described. Elements relevant to the day-to-day clinical practice of cardiac imaging with CT are emphasized, with focus on how and why things are done, the clinical uses of this modern technology, its current limitations, and a comparison with other imaging techniques such as catheter angiography.


Historical Background
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
Cardiac imaging using CT is a demanding task. Not only is high spatial resolution required for imaging small structures such as the coronary arteries, but high temporal resolution must also be achieved for motion-free imaging of the heart, given heart rates that may range from 50 to more than 100 beats per minute. Submillimeter spatial resolution is necessary both in-plane and longitudinally along the z-axis in order to view the small branches of the coronary arteries. Although temporal resolution of 250 msec is required for motion-free imaging of the heart during diastole, 50 msec is required for imaging during systole, during which ventricular contraction causes the greatest cardiac motion [4]. This statement applies only for heart rates up to 70 beats per minute. As the heart rate increases toward 100 beats per minute, a temporal resolution of approximately 150 msec becomes necessary to image the heart during diastole, because the intervals of lesser cardiac motion become shorter [5]. The current CT techniques target this level of temporal resolution with the use of specific ECG-synchronized techniques, segmentation, and tailored reconstruction algorithms. Respiratory motion must also be eliminated for cardiac imaging, so scanning is optimally performed in a single breath-hold.

CT technology has made remarkable progress during the past three decades, with successive generations of scanners providing faster imaging at progressively higher spatial resolution. Following is a short overview on the history of the developments in CT technology as it relates to cardiac imaging.

Axial CT
In 1972, the first generation of CT scanners was introduced [6]. This invention earned Godfrey Hounsfield and Allan Cormack the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1979 [7]. Such scanners were not very efficient by modern standards. They used a pencil-beam X-ray source. One or two detectors acquired data while the source was translated linearly across the field of view. The whole system was then rotated by steps of 1° for each source and detector translation, and this was repeated to span 180°. Approximately 5 min was needed to acquire one or two tomographic images (the earliest CT scanners were already dual-slice scanners). This approach was rapidly improved by using a narrow fan-beam X-ray source and more detectors per row (second generation) [8], and then by using a wide fan-beam X-ray source with rotation of both the source and the detectors (third generation) [8]. These latter axial CT scanners could acquire a tomographic image in less than 5 sec. Cardiac imaging by CT was first reported in 1981 [9] on a third-generation CT scanner with a 2-sec gantry rotation time, providing an effective temporal resolution of 500–1,000 msec, still insufficient to achieve motion-free images of the heart.

Fast Axial CT
In the late 1970s, a stationary detector ring was introduced to remove ring artifacts in the axial CT images (fourth generation) [8]. In 1982, both the source and the detector were made stationary on electron beam CT scanners [8], which were specifically created for cardiac imaging and could acquire a tomographic image in 100 msec. For the first time, electron beam CT provided temporal resolution sufficient for motion-free imaging of the heart during diastole [10].

Electron beam CT scanners differ from axial CT scanners. In electron beam CT, electrons are accelerated in a vacuum funnel and are precisely focused toward and swept across a 210° tungsten ring anode placed under the patient. After hitting the target ring, a cone beam of X-ray photons is emitted. The X-ray photons go through the patient and are captured by two 240° detector rows above the patient. Slice collimation is 3 mm, so 40 slices are needed to cover the entire heart (12 cm), for a total imaging time of 30 sec. Imaging can usually be performed in one breath-hold. ECG-based triggering is used for motion-free imaging during diastole. However, significant motion artifacts still remain in approximately 20% of patients [11]. Although in-plane spatial resolution is submillimeter (0.8 x 0.8 mm), the resolution along the longitudinal z-axis remains limited (3 mm) in order to image the entire heart in a single breath-hold.

Today, electron beam CT is predominantly used for the detection of calcium load in the coronary arteries, a prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease [12, 13]. It is also used to a lesser extent to perform CT coronary angiography [14] and to evaluate cardiac function [15]. The spectrum of applications for electron beam CT is limited, and its physical setup is cumbersome. It appears to have lost its competitive edge over the latest all-purpose MDCT scanners, although current technologic improvement in electron beam CT technique, such as the integration of 4-slice technology, thinner (1.5-mm) collimation, 30- to 50-msec temporal resolution, and improved user interfaces could reposition electron beam CT in the future.

Single-Slice Helical CT
Slip-ring technology was first introduced in CT scanners in 1989 [8] and enabled the gantry to rotate continuously without fixed wires, offering continuous helical scanning of entire volumes in less than 30 sec, with a 1-sec gantry rotation time and subsecond image acquisition [16]. Scanning and image positions were decoupled, allowing images to be reconstructed at any arbitrary position along the longitudinal axis. Z-axis resolution was also improved, enabling improved multiplanar and 3D image reconstruction. General image quality for a given slice thickness was not significantly different from that of axial CT, and the radiation dose was also similar, given appropriate pitch values [17].

Single-slice helical CT could be used for cardiac imaging with ECG-synchronized protocols [18]. Temporal resolution was improved over nonhelical scanners but, at 250–500 msec, remained insufficient for motion-free cardiac imaging. Almost all patients had motion artifacts [18]. In-plane spatial resolution was 0.6 x 0.6 mm. However, to cover the entire volume of the heart in a single breath hold, 3-mm collimation was required, severely limiting the z-axis resolution and the ability to evaluate the small coronary arteries.

Fan-Beam MDCT
CT scanners have been introduced with increasing numbers of detector rows, referred to as MDCT or multislice CT. In 1993, CT units were introduced with two rows of detectors and 1-sec rotation time [19]. In 1994, units with a 0.75-sec gantry rotation time were introduced [20], which improved volume coverage and z-axis resolution. In 1998, units with four rows of detectors were introduced, with 0.5-sec rotation time, in-plane resolution of 0.6 x 0.6 mm, and 1.0- to 1.25-mm collimation [21]. These units allowed an eightfold increase in performance compared with single-slice helical CT (four times the rows, twice the rotation speed). This gain in performance could be used for faster coverage of the heart by increasing the table feed per rotation, for covering a greater volume, or for improved temporal resolution to 125–250 msec. Thinner collimation (1-mm detector) could be used to improve z-axis resolution. General image quality was better than with single-slice CT and remained excellent at higher scanning speeds, thereby reducing motion artifacts.

The first MDCT scanners provided true volume image data and have enabled motion-free cardiac imaging in diastole for heart rates up to 70 beats per minute in a single 20- to 40-sec breath-hold. These scanners provided the first viable alternative to electron beam CT. These systems have superior spatial resolution to electron beam CT (0.6 x 0.6 x 1.0 mm vs 0.8 x 0.8 x 3 mm) in a single breath-hold, but inferior temporal resolution (125–250 msec vs 100 msec). ECG gating is used to improve temporal resolution, but motion artifacts are still present in approximately 50% of patients [22]. Radiation dose issues became more important, with doses up to 10 mSv for cardiac MDCT versus 1.1 mSv for electron beam CT [23], and systems were subsequently designed with variable tube output to decrease total radiation exposure during the CT examination. In such systems, tube current is modulated in two ways: by projection angle, with tube current being much lower in frontal projections than lateral projections because total attenuation (thickness of the chest) varies according to projection angle, and by ECG, with tube current being lower during systole because most of the diagnostic information comes from diastolic images, which present fewer motion artifacts.

Cone-Beam MDCT
In 2002, the latest generation of MDCT scanners was introduced, with 16 rows of detectors and even thinner collimation (0.625–0.75 mm), providing for the first time isotropic resolution of 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.6 mm and gantry rotation times of 400–500 msec. Isotropic resolution means similar resolution along all axes. Arrays of detectors with variable geometry (isotropic arrays, adaptive arrays) are used. For example, this can be 24 rows of detectors along the z-axis, with 16 central rows of 0.625-mm collimation flanked on each side by four rows of 1.25-mm collimation, and 888 columns of detectors along the plane of the gantry (Fig. 1A, 1B). The X-ray tubes are more powerful, with increased tube current, to provide faster scanning with improved effective slice thickness.



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. Two adaptive geometry configurations for detector rows, with 16 central rows at 0.625-mm collimation flanked on each side by four rows at 1.25-mm collimation. Drawing shows configuration at 16 rows of 0.625-mm collimation. Only central 16 rows of detectors are used to record a signal at their native collimation of 0.625 mm.

 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. Two adaptive geometry configurations for detector rows, with 16 central rows at 0.625-mm collimation flanked on each side by four rows at 1.25-mm collimation. Drawing shows configuration at 16 rows of 1.25-mm collimation. Signals of central 16 rows of detectors are combined two by two to produce an effective collimation of 1.25 mm, whereas signals of peripheral rows are kept at their native collimation of 1.25 mm.

 

These systems provide motion-free cardiac imaging in diastole for heart rates up to 80 beats per minute, in a 20-sec breath-hold. With segmented reconstruction algorithms (discussed later in this article), a temporal resolution of up to 65 msec can be achieved, and motion-free imaging can be performed for heart rates up to 100 beats per minute. These MDCT scanners can therefore offer both higher spatial resolution and higher temporal resolution than electron beam CT and use a small form factor, and they are multipurpose clinical units. Radiation exposure is relatively high, ranging from 5 to 10 mSv for coronary CT angiography [23]. This exposure can be reduced using tube current ECG-synchronized techniques [24]. Cone-beam artifacts are present on MDCT with more than four rows of detectors, requiring complex cone-beam algorithms for image reconstruction [2527].

Volume CT
To further improve the current generation of MDCT scanners requires increasing both temporal and spatial resolution. Increased temporal resolution can be achieved by faster gantry rotation. This is an engineering challenge because the gantry experiences centrifugal forces of 10 G (gravitational constant) on 0.5-sec rotations [21]. A realistic limit for rotation times appears to be approximately 50–200 msec (Kalendar WA, presented at the 2002 meeting of the European Congress of Radiology). Temporal resolution can also be improved using better and more complex segmentation algorithms; however, rotation time must be variable to desynchronize rotation and cardiac cycle (discussed later in this article), limiting the applicability of segmented algorithms [28].

Higher isotropic spatial resolution requires more numerous and smaller detectors, with thinner, submillimeter slice collimation. Large-area detectors (40 x 30 cm) or volume CT may replace detector arrays and are currently under development [29]. A pig heart imaged on a prototype device (General Electric Medical Systems) with a flat-panel detector made of a grid of 1024 x 1024 cells each having a resolution of 200 µm in each axis [30] shows increased anatomic detail (Fig. 2). Early results show that even the fifth-degree coronary artery branches can be visualized with such a system [31]. However, higher isotropic spatial resolution comes at a cost. As detector dimension decreases by N, contrast resolution decreases and noise increases by N2, which is compensated for by an increase in radiation dose of N4 [21]. Thus, noise and dose factors may limit future increases in spatial resolution.



View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Image of excised pig heart obtained with experimental flat-panel CT unit being developed by General Electric Medical Systems. Coronary arteries were cannulated and filled with solution of barium sulfate (Micropaque Colon, Guerbet) before imaging. Coronary CT angiogram (collimation, 200 x 200 µm; cell pitch, 0.2 mm) shows definition of coronary arteries with multiple small branches much better than current technology (16-slice MDCT). (Reprinted with permission from [30])

 


MDCT: General Principles
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
The basic principles of MDCT are relatively simple [28] (Fig. 3A). The X-ray point source and the detector array are placed on opposite sides of the patient on a ringlike structure called the gantry. The gantry rotates around the patient, who is located on a table at its center. The table moves at constant speed along the axis of the gantry. X rays are emitted toward the patient, penetrate the patient, and are captured by one or more detectors. This process generates a series of helical projections of the patient's attenuation properties. Images representing X-ray attenuation at each point in the volume traversed by the photons are then mathematically reconstructed from the helical projection data (Fig. 3B).



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. Drawings show helical projections from MDCT. Detectors follow 3D helical path, with table advancing at constant speed while gantry is rotating. Tube emits X-ray radiation (yellow) that is recorded by detectors. Resulting set of projections has helical configuration in space.

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. Drawings show helical projections from MDCT. Images are reconstructed from projection data by linear interpolation from projections closest to image plane. Advanced algorithms correct for cone-beam geometry.

 

Effective slice thickness using a single-slice detector scanner is determined by collimation, whereas in multidetector scanners it is determined by both the detector configuration and the reconstruction method. The table travel per complete rotation of the gantry divided by the X-ray beam width is called the "beam pitch." The beam pitch conforms to the current industry standard of pitch and is used in this article. In multidetector scanners, another definition of pitch is sometimes used: the table travel per complete rotation of the gantry divided by the detector width, called the "detector pitch." With a (beam) pitch of 0, there is no table motion and scanning is axial. With a pitch of 1, the table displacement for each rotation is equal to the z-axis dimension of the array of active rows of detectors. A pitch greater than 1 implies gaps in the helix of projections, whereas a pitch between 0 and 1 implies overlap between the projections (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. Drawings show that relation of table movement with respect to gantry rotation is described by beam pitch. Pitch of 0.5:1 indicates 50% overlap in projection data.

 


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. Drawings show that relation of table movement with respect to gantry rotation is described by beam pitch. Pitch of 1:1 indicates neither overlap nor gap in data.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. Drawings show that relation of table movement with respect to gantry rotation is described by beam pitch. Pitch of 1.5:1 indicates 50% gap in data.

 

Images are reconstructed from linear interpolation of projection data from rays that are the closest to the image plane (Fig. 3B), using algorithms to correct for cone-beam geometry. A minimum of 180° of projection data are mathematically required to reconstruct a complete image. Thus, slice thickness increases with pitch, which determines how much the table travels during a 180° rotation. The thinnest slice is equal to the height of a single row of detectors (the detectors are actually wider than the slice to compensate for geometric magnification). Thicker slices can be generated mathematically by combining the thinner slices. The determinants of in-plane resolution are focal spot size, detector width and geometry, reconstruction algorithm, and image matrix size. The determinants of longitudinal z-axis resolution are focal spot size, detector height and collimation, and reconstruction algorithm. The determinants of temporal resolution are gantry rotation speed and reconstruction algorithm.


Cardiac Gating
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
Gating techniques are used to improve temporal resolution and minimize imaging artifacts caused by cardiac motion. Two approaches to cardiac gating are typically used: prospective ECG triggering and retrospective ECG gating.

The least cardiac motion occurs during diastole, when the ventricles are passively filling. Prospective ECG triggering uses the ECG signal to control scanning, so that X rays are generated and projection data are acquired only during cardiac diastole, more than half the rotation of the gantry. The total number of slices produced per heartbeat during this half rotation of the gantry is proportional to the number of rows of active detectors. Because an axial scanning method (rather than helical) is typically used and the table has to move by the total collimation width after each acquisition, one heartbeat typically has to be skipped between each acquisition. About 12 cm of scanning is required to cover most heart sizes, which requires approximately 48 heartbeats for single-slice CT (5-mm collimation), 24 heartbeats for 4-slice MDCT (2.5-mm collimation each row), and 12 heartbeats for 16-slice MDCT (1.25-mm collimation each row). Thus, multidetector technology can obtain the entire scan during one breath-hold. Electron beam CT requires about 24 heartbeats and can scan the entire heart in one breath-hold. The start of the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle is estimated from the prior three to seven consecutive heartbeats and occurs approximately 450 msec before the R wave on the ECG.

Prospective triggering techniques have important limitations. They are sensitive to heart rate changes and arrhythmias, but they have limited spatial z-axis resolution in order to cover the entire heart in a single breath-hold. They are effective only for heart rates of less than 90 beats per minute and perform poorly with arrhythmias, such as in atrial fibrillation. To overcome these limitations, retrospective ECG gating techniques are commonly used, at the expense of a higher radiation dose. Retrospective gating techniques allow faster continuous cardiac volume coverage, improved z-axis resolution, and imaging of the entire cardiac cycle for functional analysis.

In retrospective techniques, partially overlapping MDCT projections are continuously acquired, and the ECG signal is simultaneously recorded. Algorithms are then used to sort the data from different phases of the cardiac cycle by progressively shifting the temporal window of acquired helical projection data relative to the R wave (Fig. 5). Every position of the heart must be covered by a detector row at every point during the cardiac cycle. This means that the scanner table must not advance more than the total width of the active detectors for each heartbeat. Helical pitch can be varied proportionally to the heart rate to achieve continuous volume coverage. Typical pitch for an average heart rate of 70 beats per minute is 0.3:1, with a total scanning time of about 20 sec for a 16-slice MDCT scanner using 0.625-mm collimation.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Temporal window for reconstruction from projection data is approximately 250 msec. Drawing shows that center of window can be located anywhere during heart cycle. Left box has its center at 10% of R-R interval, which is during systole. Right box has its center at 70% of R-R interval, which is during diastole and is most common motion-free imaging temporal window for heart. On ECG signal, P represents atrial contraction; Q, R, and S represent ventricular contraction; and T represents ventricular relaxation.

 

Two main algorithmic approaches are used to perform retrospective cardiac gating: partial scanning and segmented adapted scanning. To reconstruct an image, a minimum helical projection data segment of 180° must be available for every fan angle, corresponding to a rotation of 180° plus the breadth of the fan beam, so approximately two thirds of a full gantry rotation is required (Fig. 6A). This technique is called partial scanning. Temporal resolution is therefore two thirds of rotation time. Parallel beam geometries and rebinning techniques can be used to decrease the minimum data segment to 180°, with a temporal resolution of half the rotation time, or 250 msec for 16-slice MDCT scanners [32]. The partial scanning technique is typically used in patients with heart rates between 40 and 75 beats per minute.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A. Drawings show two types of retrospective reconstruction algorithms. In partial scanning algorithm, continuous segment of projection data at single heartbeat is used to reconstruct image.

 

To improve temporal resolution, segmented adaptive reconstruction can be used, which involves combining shorter segments of projection data from two of more subsequent cardiac cycles [33] (Fig. 6B). Temporal resolution is equal to that of the longest projection data segment. Maximum values for temporal resolution are 125 msec for segmentation over two cardiac cycles and 65 msec over four cardiac cycles. Either volume coverage or longitudinal resolution may need to be reduced to maintain a low pitch and still scan in a single breath-hold.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B. Drawings show two types of retrospective reconstruction algorithms. In segmented adaptive algorithm, different segments of projection data from same phase of cardiac cycle at successive heartbeats are used to reconstruct image. Cardiac cycle and gantry rotation must not be synchronized for different segments to cumulatively cover large enough range of projection angles to reconstruct image from data.

 


Technical Considerations
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
Several elements of cardiac CT can be optimized to produce the best possible images at the lowest dose of radiation.

Patient Position
The position of the patient in the CT scanner is important, because a patient placed off-center in the scanner produces images with suboptimal temporal resolution. The temporal resolution of any given pixel in an image depends on the temporal window of the projection data used to reconstruct that specific pixel. In helical CT using a partial scanning algorithm, a minimum helical projection data segment of 180° must be available for every fan angle, so each image is reconstructed from a segment of projection data longer than 180°. However, not every detector contributes data at each projection angle to reconstruct an image. For example, if a patient is scanned clockwise from the 11-o'clock to the 7-o'clock position to produce an image (Fig. 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D), the left side of the chest in the image has a much tighter temporal window than the right side. The temporal resolution of the points of the image in this example increases almost linearly between the edges of the field of view going from the left side of the chest to the right side [34]. By positioning the heart near the center of rotation of the gantry, the temporal resolution of its elements remains constant and average, rather than going from bad to better as the X-ray tube rotates on the gantry.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A. Drawings show variable temporal resolution across image. Segment of projection data from 11-o'clock to 7-o'clock position is used. At extremities of that segment, only partial projection data are used to reconstruct image. In this specific image, left side of chest has much tighter temporal window than right side. At 11-o'clock position, data from right chest are not used in reconstruction.

 


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B. Drawings show variable temporal resolution across image. Segment of projection data from 11-o'clock to 7-o'clock position is used. At extremities of that segment, only partial projection data are used to reconstruct image. In this specific image, left side of chest has much tighter temporal window than right side. At 2-o'clock (B) and 4-o'clock (C) positions, all data are used.

 


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7C. Drawings show variable temporal resolution across image. Segment of projection data from 11-o'clock to 7-o'clock position is used. At extremities of that segment, only partial projection data are used to reconstruct image. In this specific image, left side of chest has much tighter temporal window than right side. At 2-o'clock (B) and 4-o'clock (C) positions, all data are used.

 


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7D. Drawings show variable temporal resolution across image. Segment of projection data from 11-o'clock to 7-o'clock position is used. At extremities of that segment, only partial projection data are used to reconstruct image. In this specific image, left side of chest has much tighter temporal window than right side. At 7-o'clock position, data from right chest are not used.

 

Heart Rate
The heart rate of the patient is an important determinant of image reconstruction quality and for selecting scanning parameters such as pitch and reconstruction algorithms (pitch is covered in the next section). If the heart rate is too high (> 100 beats per minute), a temporal resolution of less than 150 msec becomes necessary for motion-free cardiac imaging during diastole. Segmented adaptive reconstruction can be used to improve temporal resolution, but at the expense of volume coverage or longitudinal resolution, to keep scanning time in one breath-hold. If neither can be sacrificed, ß-blocker medication can be administered orally or IV 1 hr before scanning to reduce the heart rate [35].

If segmented adaptive reconstruction is used, improved temporal resolution can be achieved only if the patient's heart rate is not synchronized with the rotation cycle of the gantry. If they are synchronized, the same cardiac phase corresponds to the same angular segment of projection data at every rotation, and it is therefore not possible to build the 180° span of projection data required to reconstruct individual images.

A patient's heart rate may vary during scanning. The heart rate decreases after breath-holding [36]. If the heart rate varies during scanning after the rotation time and pitch are selected by the operator, the temporal resolution will vary from image to image.

Pitch
Helical pitch is a parameter that is selected before the examination is acquired. Helical pitch is varied proportionally to the heart rate to achieve continuous volume coverage (Fig. 8). If the heart rate increases, the pitch can increase. If the heart rate decreases, the pitch must decrease. If the pitch is too high given the heart rate, gaps in the image data set are present. A pitch that is too low implies increased radiation exposure and increased duration of the breath-hold. Before scanning, the heart rate of the patient should be assessed under breath-holding conditions, and the lowest expected heart rate should be used to select the pitch. The latest scanners can automatically adjust the pitch when variations in the heart rate are detected.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8. Drawing shows how pitch must be adjusted according to heart rate, so that from beat to beat the temporal window covers adjacent nonoverlapping volumes of the heart.

 

Collimation
Scans should be acquired at the best possible spatial resolution for the specific task at hand. Coronary angiography requires the best resolution. The left main artery has a diameter of 4 mm, and the distal left anterior descending and circumflex arteries have diameters of 1 mm [37]. Submillimeter spatial resolution, both in-plane and longitudinally, is therefore required for coronary CT angiography. Other examinations, such as calcium scoring, do not require longitudinal spatial resolution this fine and are performed with slightly larger collimation. It is always possible to reconstruct thicker slices from the projection data of thinner slices, but thinner slices require higher radiation exposure.

Dosimetry
Radiation exposure for cardiac CT is relatively high because of continuous overlapping scanning and the use of retrospective cardiac gating. Coronary CT angiography has a 5- to 10-mSv exposure, which is more than the typical 2 mSv of traditional diagnostic catheter coronary angiography [23]. Calcium scoring has an exposure of 1–2 mSv [23]. Modern scanners incorporate fine control of tube current with respect to cardiac cycle, and this will become more important as spatial resolution is improved in future units. Radiation dose should be high enough to maintain an appropriate contrast-to-noise ratio for diagnostic quality images, but no higher.


Clinical Indications
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
The two most important clinical indications for cardiac CT are calcium scoring and coronary CT angiography. CT may also be used to characterize coronary plaque and to evaluate cardiac function, myocardial perfusion, infarcts, tumors, pericardial disease, postsurgical complications, and congenital malformations [38]. The exact roles of coronary CT angiography for atherosclerotic heart disease and patient selection criteria for coronary CT angiography are under investigation.


Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
Coronary artery plaques can be calcified. Even small amounts of calcification can be identified on CT. Since the advent of electron beam CT, coronary calcium has been a popular but controversial noninvasive method to assess coronary artery disease. The load of coronary calcium increases by about 15–25% per year without treatment, and either slows or stops during statin therapy [39]. Large amounts of coronary calcium are a sensitive, but not a specific, marker for coronary artery disease [12]. Yet the value of coronary calcium as an independent or superior risk factor to predict cardiac events has not been fully established [40]. The current American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines [12] describe two indications for calcium scoring: to detect coronary calcium in patients with atypical chest pain, and to quantify and follow up calcified coronary plaque in asymptomatic patients with other positive cardiovascular risk factors.

Acquisition
A typical protocol used for 16-slice MDCT is as follows: axial 16-row mode, 1.25-mm collimation, 20-mm table feed between each acquisition, reconstruction of eight images at 2.5-mm thickness per table location, 0.4- to 0.5-sec rotation, scanning from the carina to cardiac apex, X-ray tube at 120 kV and 300–320 mAs, field of view of 25 cm, and prospective gating with a delay of 70%. The protocol may be executed twice for reproducibility assessment. Ideally, a continuous volume containing the heart should be scanned as rapidly as possible in one breath-hold to minimize motion, with thin slices and the lowest radiation exposure providing a sufficiently high contrast-to-noise ratio. Cardiac gating should be used to avoid gaps. In this case, prospective cardiac gating is used. A CT phantom can be placed underneath the patient to calibrate the attenuation values in the final images [13]. Initial scout posteroanterior and lateral views are obtained to locate the position of the heart. After a period of hyperventilation, the patient is asked to breath-hold. The approximate image acquisition time by axial cine protocol is 15–16 sec, the exposure time is 3.4 sec, and the total radiation dose is 1–2 mSv [23].

Postprocessing
The total coronary calcium load is determined semiautomatically. A threshold of 130 H and higher is used, and all clusters of calcifications in the coronary arteries are identified by a postprocessing algorithm and quantified. Clusters smaller than two pixels are considered to be noise and are not included in the final assessment. For semiquantitative assessment of coronary artery calcium, the Agatston calcium score is the most widely used [41]. The total score is the sum of all scores of calcium clusters on all images of the scan (Fig. 9A, 9B, 9C, 9D). The score of each single lesion on each image is the product of its area multiplied by a cofactor reflecting calcium density in each lesion. More precisely, the cofactor indicates maximal attenuation in the lesion (1, 130–199 H; 2, 200–299 H; 3, 300–399 H; and 4, >= 400 H). The Agatston score is highly dependent on the imaging parameters and shows variable reproducibility, especially for small amounts of calcium, with variations in the scores by 20% or more from scan to scan [42]. Volumetric quantification algorithms are also available for calcium scoring [43]. They have a higher reproducibility (7–25% variability) [43] and could replace the Agatston score in the future.



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9A. 55-year-old man with multiple cardiovascular risk factors who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 1.25 mm; rotation time, 500 msec) for calcium scoring. Scores from all lesions on all images are summed to generate total calcium score. In this case, total score was 750. Images at four levels are presented. MDCT scans show calcification in left main coronary artery (LMA) and left anterior descending (LAD) arteries.

 


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9B. 55-year-old man with multiple cardiovascular risk factors who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 1.25 mm; rotation time, 500 msec) for calcium scoring. Scores from all lesions on all images are summed to generate total calcium score. In this case, total score was 750. Images at four levels are presented. MDCT scans show calcification in left main coronary artery (LMA) and left anterior descending (LAD) arteries.

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9C. 55-year-old man with multiple cardiovascular risk factors who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 1.25 mm; rotation time, 500 msec) for calcium scoring. Scores from all lesions on all images are summed to generate total calcium score. In this case, total score was 750. Images at four levels are presented. MDCT scans show calcification in right coronary (RCA) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries.

 


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9D. 55-year-old man with multiple cardiovascular risk factors who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 1.25 mm; rotation time, 500 msec) for calcium scoring. Scores from all lesions on all images are summed to generate total calcium score. In this case, total score was 750. Images at four levels are presented. MDCT scans show calcification in right coronary (RCA) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries.

 

Comparison with Electron Beam CT
Although calcium scoring has been performed since the 1990s using electron beam CT, it is slowly being replaced by scoring with MDCT because of the greater availability of the latter type of units. MDCT has a poorer temporal resolution than does electron beam CT (250 vs 100 msec), so images by MDCT have more motion artifacts. However, MDCT has higher spatial resolution than electron beam CT, lower image noise, and similar radiation exposure (1.0 vs 0.7 mSv) [23]. Noise can be decreased in MDCT by varying tube current and voltage, which is useful for obese patients. Increase in overlap of projection data (decreasing pitch) results in higher reproducibility than electron beam CT [44].


Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
By far the most exciting new development of MDCT is noninvasive motion-free imaging of the lumen of the coronary arteries. The latest 16-slice technology [45] enables submillimeter isotropic resolution in all three axes, and therefore excellent reformatting in any imaging plane. This technology makes possible evaluation of many small structures, such as distal submillimeter coronary artery branches, that was not possible with 4-slice CT. It also makes feasible reliable visualization and assessment of grafts, stent patency, and in-stent stenosis.

Today most coronary CT angiography is still experimental. CT angiography is clinically indicated for evaluation of the patency of coronary vessels after intervention, for evaluation for a suspected anomalous coronary artery origin, and in patients with atypical chest pain. CT angiography may be useful for follow-up of patients undergoing statin therapy [46], to assess cardiac valves, and in other cardiac diseases such as tumors and pericardial disease.

Electron beam CT has been reported to have high sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for assessment of the proximal and mid segments of the coronary arteries [47, 48]. The limited longitudinal spatial resolution of electron beam CT (1.5–3.0 mm) in a single breath-hold limits its assessment of distal coronary arteries. Images are also degraded by motion, and imaging of several coronary segments (e.g., the mid right coronary artery and the circumflex artery) is often of poor quality because of the atrial contraction at end-diastole. Studies have found that approximately 25% of coronary artery segments must be excluded because of poor image quality [47, 49]. The same is true for 4-slice MDCT, for which visibility of coronary segments is optimal for heart rates only below 65 beats per minute [50].

Because of its shorter acquisition time, superior spatial resolution (0.625-mm longitudinal resolution), and temporal resolution approaching that of electron beam CT, 16-slice MDCT is currently superior to electron beam CT and 4-slice MDCT for the evaluation of coronary artery disease [51], especially in coronary segments with diameters smaller than 2 mm.

At least four elements affect the quality of the images produced by CT angiography. First, the presence of heavy calcification creates streak artifacts and markedly limits the assessment of vessel lumen. The possible development of calcium subtraction techniques may minimize or eliminate this artifact. Second, excessive motion can markedly degrade image quality. The duration of the period of low motion decreases at high heart rates, making imaging more difficult. A heart rate greater than 75 beats per minute and arrhythmia are therefore limiting. The motion of the left main, left anterior descending, and circumflex coronary arteries mainly follows the motion of the left ventricle. The motion of the right coronary artery is related to the contraction of the right atrium and ventricle and is not negligible at end-diastole. Good assessment of the mid portion of the right coronary artery is especially problematic in many cases [52], a problem also seen with coronary MR angiography. Third, coronary CT angiography becomes less reliable for small vessels with a lumen diameter of 0.5–1.5 mm. Fourth, a breath-hold of approximately 30 sec may be required for adequate coronary imaging, depending on the heart size and heart rate. Although such a breath-hold is not a problem for normal test subjects (or with CT phantoms [45]), it can prove difficult for patients with severe cardiac disease.

Acquisition
A typical protocol for 16-slice MDCT is as follows: helical 16-row mode, 0.625-mm collimation (1.25-mm collimation if scanning time is > 30 sec), 400- to 600-msec rotation, pitch of 0.275:1–0.3:1, scanning from the carina to the cardiac apex, X-ray tube at 120 kV and 340–400 mAs, field of view of 25 cm, and retrospective gating. Initial scout frontal and lateral images are obtained and the position of the heart is identified. After a period of hyperventilation, the patient is asked to breath-hold. Unenhanced CT through the coronary arteries is performed for the purpose of calcium scoring and to confirm location of the heart. This is followed by a timing bolus to determine the scanning delay for coronary CT angiography. A single axial scan at 5-mm collimation approximately 1 cm below the carina is obtained every 2 sec to determine peak aortic root enhancement (Fig. 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, 10E). A region of interest is placed in the root of the aorta, near the origin of the left main coronary artery. A test bolus of a total of 15–20 mL of iohexol 300 (Omnipaque-300, Nycomed Imaging) is administered at a rate of 4 mL/sec. Additional parameters are field of view, 25 cm; and X-ray tube, 120 kV and 40 mAs. The image acquisition and exposure time is 12–15 sec, and the total radiation dose is 0.33 mSv (Goodsitt MM, unpublished data). The scanning delay is typically equal to the time from the start of the injection to peak enhancement of the ascending aorta, plus 3–5 sec for filling of the distal coronary arteries.



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10A. 51-year-old man who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec). Sequential images every 2 sec show progression of timing bolus. Region of interest (circle) is centered on aortic root to determine peak enhancement for timing purposes. Total of 15–20 mL of contrast agent is administered at rate of 4 mL/sec, and images are acquired until enhancement in region of interest reaches predefined threshold. MDCT scans show that after 2 sec of injection, only superior vena cava is enhanced (A); after 10 sec of injection, pulmonary arteries enhance (B); after 20 sec, aorta shows early enhancement (C); and after 30 sec, aorta fully enhances at value greater than 100 H (D).

 


View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10B. 51-year-old man who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec). Sequential images every 2 sec show progression of timing bolus. Region of interest (circle) is centered on aortic root to determine peak enhancement for timing purposes. Total of 15–20 mL of contrast agent is administered at rate of 4 mL/sec, and images are acquired until enhancement in region of interest reaches predefined threshold. MDCT scans show that after 2 sec of injection, only superior vena cava is enhanced (A); after 10 sec of injection, pulmonary arteries enhance (B); after 20 sec, aorta shows early enhancement (C); and after 30 sec, aorta fully enhances at value greater than 100 H (D).

 


View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10C. 51-year-old man who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec). Sequential images every 2 sec show progression of timing bolus. Region of interest (circle) is centered on aortic root to determine peak enhancement for timing purposes. Total of 15–20 mL of contrast agent is administered at rate of 4 mL/sec, and images are acquired until enhancement in region of interest reaches predefined threshold. MDCT scans show that after 2 sec of injection, only superior vena cava is enhanced (A); after 10 sec of injection, pulmonary arteries enhance (B); after 20 sec, aorta shows early enhancement (C); and after 30 sec, aorta fully enhances at value greater than 100 H (D).

 


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10D. 51-year-old man who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec). Sequential images every 2 sec show progression of timing bolus. Region of interest (circle) is centered on aortic root to determine peak enhancement for timing purposes. Total of 15–20 mL of contrast agent is administered at rate of 4 mL/sec, and images are acquired until enhancement in region of interest reaches predefined threshold. MDCT scans show that after 2 sec of injection, only superior vena cava is enhanced (A); after 10 sec of injection, pulmonary arteries enhance (B); after 20 sec, aorta shows early enhancement (C); and after 30 sec, aorta fully enhances at value greater than 100 H (D).

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10E. 51-year-old man who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec). Sequential images every 2 sec show progression of timing bolus. Region of interest (circle) is centered on aortic root to determine peak enhancement for timing purposes. Total of 15–20 mL of contrast agent is administered at rate of 4 mL/sec, and images are acquired until enhancement in region of interest reaches predefined threshold. Graph illustrates that in this case 100 H was reached at 30 sec (image 15). Scanning delay used for coronary CT angiography is 30 sec + 5 sec to allow contrast agent to fill arteries.

 

The next step is the actual coronary CT angiography. A total dose of 100–150 mL of iohexol 300 is administered through an antecubital vein using a power injector at a rate of 4 mL/sec, using the scanning delay determined from the timing bolus. The rapid scanning time of the 16-slice MDCT scanner reduces the duration of the single breath-hold scan and therefore reduces the amount of IV contrast material necessary for the examination. This step is also performed after a period of hyperventilation. The image acquisition and exposure time is 15–30 sec.

Postprocessing
Postprocessing steps include retrospective reconstruction of the images at a resolution of 0.6 x 0.6 x 0.625 mm, at phases 70%, 75%, and 80% of the R-R interval. A partial scanning algorithm is used if the heart rate is less than 60 beats per minute; otherwise, segmented adaptive scanning is used. The sequences of images at all three reconstructed phases are transferred to a processing workstation for further analysis with specialized software. The three sequences are initially compared, and the sequence showing the least amount of motion is selected for further processing. In practice, the sequence of images reconstructed at 75% is the most often used for further processing, so the other two sequences are examined only if the former is contaminated by too much motion.

Initial processing of the acquired data produces an image of the global coronary tree, using 3D surface shading and 3D volume rendering. Examination of the coronary arteries is then performed, with the assistance of coronary artery analysis software, using 2D multiplanar reformations, 2D maximum intensity projections, and curved coronary artery reformations (Fig. 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D). The American College of Cardiology–American Heart Association guidelines for segmental anatomy [53] and lesion morphology [54] are used for lesion characterization. Each stenosis is graded by percentage of diameter, with reference to the coronary artery diameter proximal and distal to the stenosis. Bypass grafts are included in the scan and are evaluated from their proximal to distal anastomoses. Multiple findings can be identified in the coronary arteries, such as stents, aneurysms, or an aberrant origin (Figs. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16).



View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11A. 50-year-old man with atypical chest pain who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. Multiplanar reformatting illustrates left anterior descending coronary artery (A) and right coronary artery (B).

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11B. 50-year-old man with atypical chest pain who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. Multiplanar reformatting illustrates left anterior descending coronary artery (A) and right coronary artery (B).

 


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11C. 50-year-old man with atypical chest pain who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. Straightening of coronary artery by powerful algorithms assists visualization and aids in quantifying stenosis.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11D. 50-year-old man with atypical chest pain who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. Surface shading of heart shows 3D course of coronary arteries on its surface. Asterisk indicates right ventricle (RV) outflow. AA = ascending thoracic aorta, LAD = left anterior descending, RA = right atrium, RCA = right coronary artery.

 


View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12. 60-year-old man who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. MDCT scan shows dense calcifications in left main (arrow) and left anterior descending (arrowheads) coronary arteries.

 


View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 13. 15-year-old boy with multiple vascular abnormalities who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. MDCT scan shows multiple aneurysmal dilatations of right coronary artery (arrows).

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14. 55-year-old man after coronary angioplasty and stent placement in distal right coronary artery who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation 16 x 0.75 mm; rotation time, 420 msec; table feed, 6.6 mm/sec) for CT angiography. MDCT scan shows patency of stent lumen and high-grade luminal narrowing (arrow) just proximal to stent. (Courtesy of Soo CS, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

 


View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 15. 35-year-old man who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation 16 x 0.75 mm; rotation time, 420 msec; table feed, 6.6 mm/sec) for CT angiography. Three-dimensional surface rendering of MDCT scan shows abnormal origin of right coronary artery (RCA), which originates from left main coronary artery. Left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery is unusual in diameter. Coronary artery tree can be visualized as far as vessels with diameters smaller than 1 mm. LCX = left circumflex artery. (Courtesy of Lo G, Hong Kong, China)

 


View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 16. 47-year-old man after repair of ascending aortic aneurysm who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for thoracic aortic CT angiography. MDCT scan shows surgical injury near origin (arrow) of right coronary artery. AA = ascending thoracic aorta. Asterisk indicates pseudoaneurysm caused by surgical injury.

 

Comparison with Catheter Angiography
Most studies comparing MDCT with catheter angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis have been performed using 4-slice MDCT [22, 5560]. Image quality and spatial resolution for proximal and mid segments of the coronaries have been good; however, as many as 30% of coronary artery segments have been excluded because of motion [22, 55, 60]. For stenosis exceeding 50% in diameter, Achenbach et al. [22, 55] found a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 76%; and Nieman et al. [60] found sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values to be 82%, 93%, 66%, and 97% respectively. Vogl et al. [61] found a sensitivity of 73.4% using multiplanar reconstruction.

In recent series of patients, researchers compared 16-slice MDCT with coronary angiography [35, 62] (Fig. 17A, 17B). Image quality and spatial resolution of even distal segments and side branches were excellent [51], and temporal resolution and longitudinal spatial resolution improved compared with 4-slice MDCT [63]. For stenosis exceeding 50% in diameter, Nieman et al. [62] found sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values to be 95%, 86%, 80%, and 97%, respectively. In that research, accuracy for detection of lesions was 100% for the left main artery, 91% for the left anterior descending artery, 81% for the circumflex artery, and 86% for the right coronary artery. Ropers et al. [35] obtained similar results for stenosis greater than 50%: sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 93%, accuracy of 93%, and positive and negative predictive values of 79% and 97%, respectively.



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 17A. 45-year-old asymptomatic male volunteer who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. MDCT scan shows soft plaque (arrow) in proximal left anterior descending coronary artery.

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 17B. 45-year-old asymptomatic male volunteer who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. Catheter coronary angiogram reveals same lesion (arrow).

 


Cardiac Function
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
The same data set acquired by MDCT for coronary artery imaging can be reformatted and used for functional cardiac imaging. Cardiac chamber volumes, ejection fraction, wall thickness, and global and segmental wall motion can be assessed. Images are retrospectively reconstructed at 5-mm collimation to produce sequences of images at multiple phases of the cardiac cycle—typically, 20— each spanning the entire heart from base to apex. The end-systolic sequence is centered on the T wave, and the end-diastolic sequence is centered between the R wave and following P wave. Both long- and short-axis planes of the left ventricle are reconstructed for each sequence (Fig. 18A, 18B, 18C, 18D).



View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 18A. Multiplanar reformatting of heart allows visualization in standard tomographic views. Patient is same 50-year-old man shown in Figure 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. Multiplanar reformatting illustrates short-axis view (A), long-axis two-chamber view (B), long-axis three-chamber view (C), and long-axis four-chamber view (D). LV = left ventricle, RV = right ventricle, LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium, Ao = aorta.

 


View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 18B. Multiplanar reformatting of heart allows visualization in standard tomographic views. Patient is same 50-year-old man shown in Figure 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. Multiplanar reformatting illustrates short-axis view (A), long-axis two-chamber view (B), long-axis three-chamber view (C), and long-axis four-chamber view (D). LV = left ventricle, RV = right ventricle, LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium, Ao = aorta.

 


View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 18C. Multiplanar reformatting of heart allows visualization in standard tomographic views. Patient is same 50-year-old man shown in Figure 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. Multiplanar reformatting illustrates short-axis view (A), long-axis two-chamber view (B), long-axis three-chamber view (C), and long-axis four-chamber view (D). LV = left ventricle, RV = right ventricle, LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium, Ao = aorta.

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 18D. Multiplanar reformatting of heart allows visualization in standard tomographic views. Patient is same 50-year-old man shown in Figure 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) for coronary CT angiography. Multiplanar reformatting illustrates short-axis view (A), long-axis two-chamber view (B), long-axis three-chamber view (C), and long-axis four-chamber view (D). LV = left ventricle, RV = right ventricle, LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium, Ao = aorta.

 

Wall motion is qualitatively assessed by the radiologist from cine loops in the long- and short-axis planes. Automated left ventricular endocardial and epicardial contour detection is performed using specialized software on the short-axis images of the left ventricle for all 20 phases of the cardiac cycle. Following conventions used for echocardiography, the aortic outflow tract is not included in the volume, and the papillary muscles are included inside the endocardial borders [64]. The contours are then verified by a CT technologist or a radiologist, and fine manual adjustments can be made, if necessary, to ensure correct placement.

From the endocardial and epicardial contours at each phase of the cardiac cycle (Fig. 19A, 19B), the software computes two sets of measurements. First, the volumes bounded by the endocardium and epicardium are computed using Simpson's rule [6466], and the variation of volumes throughout the cardiac cycle is determined [67]. From these basic measurements, the end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, ejection fraction, stroke volume, cardiac output, and cyclic variations in the myocardial wall thickness are derived. The results are displayed graphically. Second, the radial excursion of each point of the endocardium throughout the cardiac cycle is computed and displayed graphically for three levels (base, mid left ventricle, apex) to determine regional left ventricular wall motion.



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 19A. Left ventricular mass and volume may be generated from 16-slice cardiac CT data sets. Patient is same 50-year-old man shown in Figure 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D who underwent 16-slice MDCT for coronary CT angiography. Multiplanar reformatting in short-axis view shows tracing of endocardial (red) and epicardial (green) contours.

 


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 19B. Left ventricular mass and volume may be generated from 16-slice cardiac CT data sets. Patient is same 50-year-old man shown in Figure 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D who underwent 16-slice MDCT for coronary CT angiography. Three-dimensional model of endocardial (red) and epicardial (green) contours can be reconstructed from individual tracings.

 


Other Indications
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
Cardiac CT can be used to identify or evaluate the presence of cardiac tumors (Figs. 20 and 21A, 21B) or thrombus (Fig. 22), postsurgical complications, congenital anomalies, and the great vessels and pericardium (Fig. 23). Newer indications include the evaluation of pulmonary vein anatomy [68] in planning ablation of atrial fibrillation foci that are found in myocardial slips that extend along the veins (Figs. 24A, 24B, 24C, 24D and 25) and the evaluation of the coronary sinus anatomy for planning placement of biventricular pacemakers (Fig. 26).



View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 20. 65-year-old man with right ventricular rhabdomyosarcoma who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec). Tumor originates from free wall of right ventricle and invades right coronary artery. It is accompanied by pericardial effusion. (Courtesy of Sablayrolles JL, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France)

 


View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 21A. 54-year-old woman with left atrial angiosarcoma who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec). Multiplanar reformatting in long-axis four-chamber view shows left atrial mass.

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 21B. 54-year-old woman with left atrial angiosarcoma who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec). Multiplanar reformatting in slightly-off-center long-axis two-chamber view shows high attenuation in tumor that represents tumor vascularity (arrows). Mass arises from cranial and posterior aspects of left atrial wall, fills 80% of left atrium, and extends into left atrial appendage (asterisk) and left superior pulmonary vein ostium. Mass also extends into subcarinal region and along bronchovascular bundles of bilateral hila. Arrowhead indicates mitral valve, curved arrow indicates papillary muscle.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 22. 48-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec). Note large thrombus in right atrium. (Courtesy of Sablayrolles JL, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France)

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 23. 40-year-old woman who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec). MDCT scan shows tuberculous pericarditis with abscess. Note external mass effect on right ventricle and right atrium. (Courtesy of Sablayrolles JL, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France)

 


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 24A. 35-year-old man with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 1.25 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) before and after radiofrequency ablation therapy. Protocol is similar to that of coronary CT angiography except for 1.25-mm collimation and timing bolus detected at level of left atrium. MDCT scan shows normal left inferior pulmonary vein (arrow; diameter, 13 mm) before ablation therapy.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 24B. 35-year-old man with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 1.25 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) before and after radiofrequency ablation therapy. Protocol is similar to that of coronary CT angiography except for 1.25-mm collimation and timing bolus detected at level of left atrium. MDCT scan 3 months after ablation therapy shows moderate stenosis (arrow; diameter, 6 mm) in left inferior pulmonary vein.

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 24C. 35-year-old man with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 1.25 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) before and after radiofrequency ablation therapy. Protocol is similar to that of coronary CT angiography except for 1.25-mm collimation and timing bolus detected at level of left atrium. MDCT scan 8 months after ablation therapy shows that stenosis (arrow) has become more severe (diameter, 3 mm).

 


View larger version (215K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 24D. 35-year-old man with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 1.25 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) before and after radiofrequency ablation therapy. Protocol is similar to that of coronary CT angiography except for 1.25-mm collimation and timing bolus detected at level of left atrium. Shaded-surface display 3 months after ablation therapy shows stenosis (arrow).

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 25. 47-year-old man with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 1.25 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) before radiofrequency ablation therapy. Three-dimensional surface-shaded view from inside left atrium shows four pulmonary vein openings and left atrial appendage (arrow).

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 26. 64-year-old woman who underwent 16-slice MDCT (collimation, 16 x 1.25 mm; rotation time, 500 msec; table feed, 6 mm/sec) before placement of biventricular pacemaker. Three-dimensional surface-shaded view of posterior aspect of heart reveals coronary sinus (arrow) entering right atrium (RA). LV = left ventricle, RV = right ventricle, LA = left atrium.

 

Several new experimental but promising roles are possible for cardiac CT with the latest scanners. Plaque characterization seems promising. Not all coronary artery plaques are calcified: some are soft and fatty, and others are more fibrous. Lipid-rich noncalcified plaques are most prone to spontaneous rupture, leading to acute cardiac events and death, and are known as "vulnerable plaque" [69]. Until now, only intravascular sonography could be used to differentiate lipid-rich and fibrous plaques. The noninvasive accurate identification of vulnerable plaque may lead to preemptive intervention before an acute coronary event, either by invasive means such as angioplasty and stenting, or by pharmacologic means such as statin therapy [46]. Recent research finds that MDCT enables not only identification but also characterization of coronary plaques. Schroeder et al. [70], using intravascular sonography as the reference test, showed that the average density of coronary plaques correlated well with their echogenicity on sonography. Average density of the plaques was 14 ± 26 H for soft plaque (low echogenicity), 91 ± 21 H for intermediate plaque (bright echoes), and 419 ± 194 H for calcified plaque (bright echoes with acoustic shadowing). Nikolaou et al. [71] found that lipid-rich plaques have a density of 50 ± 12 H, whereas fibrous plaques have a density of 89 ± 31 H, using histopathology as the reference test. Morphologic criteria can also be used to determine the presence of thrombus [72]. Collimation is of major importance in plaque characterization, and quantitative density measurements are affected by volume averaging from the contrast-enhanced vessel lumen with thicker collimation.

Another area of investigation is the identification and characterization of myocardial perfusion defects after an infarct [73]. Differences in myocardial wall enhancement after the administration of IV contrast material occur as a result of vascular obstruction and local edema, and have been detected by CT for years. The improved temporal and spatial resolution of MDCT will likely allow more precise characterization and follow-up. Similar assessment of myocardial perfusion is currently done by MRI with the patient at rest and under stress, and enables detection of infarction and ischemia [74].


Conclusion
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 
If accuracy is reproducible, coronary angiography using MDCT could be widely applied to the diagnosis and follow-up of ischemic coronary artery disease, a major cause of mortality in the United States. Coronary angiography using MDCT may be useful for the evaluation of chest pain in the emergency room, triaging patients to observation, coronary artery bypass grafting, and percutaneous revascularization. It could also be used for screening purposes for at-risk individuals to decrease the incidence of coronary disease mortality. As a noninvasive test for atherosclerosis, cardiac CT may potentially increase the number of individuals seeking evaluation for coronary artery disease who may avoid disease as a result of the current methods of diagnosis, and whose first presentation heretofore has often been sudden death.


References
Top
Introduction
Historical Background
MDCT: General Principles
Cardiac Gating
Technical Considerations
Clinical Indications
Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging
Coronary Artery Lumen Imaging
Cardiac Function
Other Indications
Conclusion
References
 

  1. American Heart Association, American Stroke Association. 2002 Heart and stroke statistical update. Dallas, TX: The American Heart Association, 2002
  2. Noto TJ Jr, Johnson LW, Krone R, et al. Cardiac catheterization 1990: a report of the registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn1991; 24:75 –83[Medline]
  3. Lauer MS. Exercise electrocardiogram testing and prognosis: novel markers and predictive instruments. Cardiol Clin2001; 19:401 –414[Medline]
  4. Stehling MK, Turner R, Mansfield P. Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second. Science1991; 254:43 –50[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lu B, Mao SS, Zhuang N, et al. Coronary artery motion during the cardiac cycle and optimal ECG triggering for coronary artery imaging. Invest Radiol2001; 36:250 –256[Medline]
  6. Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol1973; 46:1016 –1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hounsfield GN. Nobel award address: computed medical imaging. Med Phys 1980;7:283 –290[Medline]
  8. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM Jr, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2002 :xvi,331 –339
  9. Lackner K, Thurn P. Computed tomography of the heart: ECG-gated and continuous scans. Radiology1981; 140:413 –420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Boyd DP, Lipton MJ. Cardiac computed-tomography. Proc IEEE 1983;71:298 –307
  11. Lu B, Zhuang N, Mao SS, et al. EKG-triggered CT data acquisition to reduce variability in coronary arterial calcium score. Radiology2002; 224:838 –844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. O'Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol2000; 36:326 –340[Free Full Text]
  13. Bielak LF, Peyser PA, Sheedy PF 2nd. Electronbeam computed tomography screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease. Semin Roentgenol2003; 38:39 –53[Medline]
  14. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Bachmann K. Noninvasive coronary angiography by contrast-enhanced electron beam computed tomography. Clin Cardiol1998; 21:323 –330[Medline]
  15. Becker A, Becker C, Knez A, et al. Functional imaging of the heart with electron-beam computed tomography [in German]. Radiologe 1998;38:1021 –1028[Medline]
  16. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P. Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology1990; 176:181 –183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz WA. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol1999; 9:323 –328[Medline]
  18. Woodhouse CE, Janowitz WR, Viamonte M Jr. Coronary arteries: retrospective cardiac gating technique to reduce cardiac motion artifact at spiral CT. Radiology1997; 204:566 –569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Liang Y, Kruger RA. Dual-slice spiral versus single-slice spiral scanning: comparison of the physical performance of two computed tomography scanners. Med Phys1996; 23:205 –220[Medline]
  20. Kalender WA. Thin-section three-dimensional spiral CT: is isotropic imaging possible? Radiology1995; 197:578 –580[Free Full Text]
  21. Kalender W. Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications. Munich, Germany: MCD Verlag, 2000: 35–81
  22. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation2001; 103:2535 –2538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation2003; 107:917 –922[Free Full Text]
  24. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol2002; 12:1081 –1086[Medline]
  25. Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A 1984;1 : 612–619
  26. Schaller S, Flohr T, Steffen P. New, efficient Fourier-reconstruction method for approximate image reconstruction in spiral cone-beam CT at small cone angles. In: Van Metter RL, Beutel J, eds. Physics of medical imaging: medical imaging 1997. Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers,1997 : 213–224
  27. Schaller S, Sauer F, Tam KC, Lauritsch G, Flohr T. Exact radon rebinning algorithm for the long object problem in helical cone-beam CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2000; 19:361 –375[Medline]
  28. Ohnesorge BM, Becker CR, Flohr TG, Reiser MF. Multislice CT in cardiac imaging: technical principles, clinical application and future developments. London: Springer, 2002:15 –48
  29. Ning R, Chen B, Yu R, Conover D, Tang X, Ning Y. Flat-panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: system evaluation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2000; 19:949 –963[Medline]
  30. Knollmann F, Pfoh A. Image in cardiovascular medicine: coronary artery imaging with flat-panel computed tomography. Circulation2003; 107:1209[Free Full Text]
  31. Knollmann FD, Edic PM, Cesmeli E, Pfoh AH, Yankah CA, Felix R. Coronary artery imaging with flat-panel computed tomography. (abstr) Radiology2002; 225(P):538 –539
  32. Kachelriess M, Kalender WA. Electrocardiogram-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond spiral computed tomography scans of the heart. Med Phys 1998;25:2417 –2431[Medline]
  33. Kachelriess M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA. ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart. Med Phys 2000;27:1881 –1902[Medline]
  34. Hu H, Pan TS, Shen Y. Multislice helical CT: image temporal resolution. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2000; 19:384 –390[Medline]
  35. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation2003; 107:664 –666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Zwillich C, Devlin T, White D, Douglas N, Weil J, Martin R. Bradycardia during sleep apnea: characteristics and mechanism. J Clin Invest 1982;69:1286 –1292
  37. Gray H, Williams PL, Bannister LH. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery, 38th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1995:xx,1507
  38. Gilkeson RC, Ciancibello L, Zahka K. Multidetector CT evaluation of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. AJR 2003;180:973 –980[Free Full Text]
  39. Callister TQ, Raggi P, Cooil B, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ. Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coronary artery disease as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. N Engl J Med1998; 339:1972 –1978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Wayhs R, Zelinger A, Raggi P. High coronary artery calcium scores pose an extremely elevated risk for hard events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:225 –230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol1990; 15:827 –832[Abstract]
  42. Devries S, Wolfkiel C, Shah V, Chomka E, Rich S. Reproducibility of the measurement of coronary calcium with ultrafast computed tomography. Am J Cardiol1995; 75:973 –975[Medline]
  43. Callister TQ, Cooil B, Raya SP, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ, Raggi P. Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology1998; 208:807 –814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Fischbach R, et al. Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT. Eur Radiol2002; 12:1532 –1540[Medline]
  45. Flohr TG, Schoepf UJ, Kuettner A, et al. Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems. Acad Radiol2003; 10:386 –401[Medline]
  46. de Groot E, Jukema JW, van Boven AJ, et al. Effect of pravastatin on progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis and vessel wall changes in carotid and femoral arteries: a report from the Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study. Am J Cardiol1995; 76:40C –46C[Medline]
  47. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Daniel WG. Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. N Engl J Med1998; 339:1964 –1971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Nikolaou K, Huber A, Knez A, Becker C, Bruening R, Reiser M. Intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced electron-beam computed tomography and navigator-echo-based magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive coronary artery angiography. Eur Radiol2002; 12:1663 –1671[Medline]
  49. Rensing BJ, Bongaerts A, van Geuns RJ, van Ooijen P, Oudkerk M, de Feyter PJ. Intravenous coronary angiography by electron beam computed tomography: a clinical evaluation. Circulation1998; 98:2509 –2512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Kuettner A, et al. Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. Clin Imaging 2002;26:106 –111[Medline]
  51. Heuschmid M, Kuttner A, Flohr T, et al. Visualization of coronary arteries in CT as assessed by a new 16 slice technology and reduced gantry rotation time: first experiences [in German]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr2002; 174:721 –724[Medline]
  52. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Holle J, Muschiol G, Daniel WG, Moshage W. In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. Radiology2000; 216:457 –463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol1999; 33:1756 –1824[Free Full Text]
  54. Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): executive summary—a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol2001; 37:2215 –2239[Free Full Text]
  55. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation2000; 102:2823 –2828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, et al. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology2000; 217:564 –571[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Knez A, Becker C, Ohnesorge B, Haberl R, Reiser M, Steinbeck G. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis by multislice helical computed tomography. Circulation2000; 101:E221 –E222
  58. Cline H, Coulam C, Yavuz M, et al. Coronary artery angiography using multislice computed tomography images. Circulation2000; 102:1589 –1590[Free Full Text]
  59. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ, et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet2001; 357:599 –603[Medline]
  60. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ, et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol2002; 89:913 –918[Medline]
  61. Vogl TJ, Abolmaali ND, Diebold T, et al. Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology2002; 223:212 –220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation2002; 106:2051 –2054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Flohr T, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, Simon J, Schaller S, Ohnesorge B. New technical developments in multislice CT. 2. Sub-millimeter 16-slice scanning and increased gantry rotation speed for cardiac imaging. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr2002; 174:1022 –1027[Medline]
  64. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography: American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:358 –367[Medline]
  65. Dujardin KS, Enriquez-Sarano M, Rossi A, Bailey KR, Seward JB. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular remodeling: are left ventricular diameters suitable tools? J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1534 –1541[Abstract]
  66. Helak JW, Reichek N. Quantitation of human left ventricular mass and volume by two-dimensional echocardiography: in vitro anatomic validation. Circulation1981; 63:1398 –1407[Free Full Text]
  67. Yamaoka O, Yabe T, Okada M, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular mass: comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast left ventriculography. Am Heart J1993; 126:1372 –1379[Medline]
  68. Schwartzman D, Lacomis J, Wigginton WG. Characterization of left atrium and distal pulmonary vein morphology using multidimensional computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41 :1349 –1357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Virmani R, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A. Vulnerable plaque: the pathology of unstable coronary lesions. J Interv Cardiol 2002;15:439 –446[Medline]
  70. Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A, et al. Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol2001; 37:1430 –1435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Nikolaou K, Becker CR, Babaryka G, Muders M, Loehrs U, Reiser MF. High-resolution magnetic resonance and multi-slice CT imaging of coronary artery plaques in human ex vivo coronary arteries. (abstr) Radiology2001; 221(P):503 –504
  72. Becker CR. Combined approach of contrast and non contrast CT for the assessment of coronary atherosclerosis [in German]. Herz 2003;28:32 –35[Medline]
  73. Schmermund A, Bell MR, Lerman LO, Ritman EL, Rumberger JA. Quantitative evaluation of regional myocardial perfusion using fast X-ray computed tomography. Herz1997; 22:29 –39[Medline]
  74. Wilke NM, Jerosch-Herold M, Zenovich A, Stillman AE. Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: clinical validation and future applications. J Magn Reson Imaging1999; 10:676 –685[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Sundaram, S. Patel, P. Agarwal, and E. A. Kazerooni
Anatomy and Terminology for the Interpretation and Reporting of Cardiac MDCT: Part 2, CT Angiography, Cardiac Function Assessment, and Noncoronary and Extracardiac Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 584 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H DOGAN, W J H VELDKAMP, P DIBBETS-SCHNEIDER, A M SPIJKERBOER, B J A MERTENS, L J M KROFT, A DE ROOS, and J GELEIJNS
Effects of heart rate, filling and slice thickness on the accuracy of left ventricular volume measurements in a dynamic cardiac phantom using ECG-gated MDCT
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2008; 81(967): 577 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. U. Juergens, H. Seifarth, F. Range, S. Wienbeck, M. Wenker, W. Heindel, and R. Fischbach
Automated Threshold-Based 3D Segmentation Versus Short-Axis Planimetry for Assessment of Global Left Ventricular Function with Dual-Source MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 308 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Mahesh and D. D. Cody
AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Physics of Cardiac Imaging with Multiple-Row Detector CT
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2007; 27(5): 1495 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E L Nickoloff and P O Alderson
A comparative study of thoracic radiation doses from 64-slice cardiac CT
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 80(955): 537 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Ferencik, D. Ropers, S. Abbara, R. C. Cury, U. Hoffmann, K. Nieman, T. J. Brady, F. Moselewski, W. G. Daniel, and S. Achenbach
Diagnostic Accuracy of Image Postprocessing Methods for the Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Using Multidetector CT
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 696 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Andreini, G. Pontone, G. Ballerini, E. Bertella, E. Nobili, A. Parolari, and M. Pepi
Bypass Graft and Native Postanastomotic Coronary Artery Patency: Assessment With Computed Tomography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1672 - 1678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. K. Pannu, W. Alvarez Jr., and E. K. Fishman
{beta}-Blockers for Cardiac CT: A Primer for the Radiologist
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S341 - S345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. D. Raptopoulos, P. B. Boiselle, N. Michailidis, J. Handwerker, A. Sabir, J. A. Edlow, I. Pedrosa, and J. B. Kruskal
MDCT Angiography of Acute Chest Pain: Evaluation of ECG-Gated and Nongated Techniques
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S346 - S356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Bruzzi, M. Remy-Jardin, D. Delhaye, A. Teisseire, C. Khalil, and J. Remy
When, Why, and How to Examine the Heart During Thoracic CT: Part 1, Basic Principles
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 324 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Tridandapani, J. B. Fowlkes, and J. M. Rubin
Echocardiography-Based Selection of Quiescent Heart Phases: Implications for Cardiac Imaging
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2005; 24(11): 1519 - 1526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. Nakanishi, Y. Kayashima, R. Inoue, K. Sumii, and Y. Gomyo
Pitfalls in 16-Detector Row CT of the Coronary Arteries
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 425 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Desjardins, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kazerooni, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Desjardins, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kazerooni, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS