AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheran, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Patz, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheran, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Patz, E. F., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 182:1129-1132
© American Roentgen Ray Society


False-Negative Findings for Primary Lung Tumors on FDG Positron Emission Tomography: Staging and Prognostic Implications

Sendhil Kumar Cheran1, Nathan D. Nielsen1 and Edward F. Patz , Jr.2

1 School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710.
2 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3803, Durham, NC 27710.

Received September 12, 2003; accepted after revision October 30, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to E. F. Patz, Jr. (patz0002{at}mc.duke.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to determine the stage and outcome of patients with primary lung tumors who had a negative finding on a FDG positron emission tomography (PET) study at the time of diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 3,912 patients between November 1994 and August 2002 underwent thoracic or whole-body PET performed at our institution for evaluation of a pulmonary abnormality suspicious for lung cancer. We identified 20 patients with a biopsy-proven primary lung tumor and a negative PET study at the time of presentation. Surgical, pathologic, radiographic imaging, and clinical follow-up information were reviewed to confirm the histology, stage, and outcome.

RESULTS. Tumor histology included adenocarcinoma (n = 7, 35%), bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma (n = 6, 30%), carcinoid (n = 3, 15%), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 2, 10%), otherwise unspecified non–small cell lung cancer (n = 1, 5%), and sarcomatoid neoplasm (n = 1, 5%). One patient with bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma had multifocal stage IV disease, and all other patients were stage IA (n = 14, 70%) or stage IB (n = 5, 25%). Eighteen (90%) of the 20 patients underwent curative surgical resection. No patient is known to have tumor recurrence after resection, and three (17%) of the 18 patients are known to be living and free of disease 5 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION. With the exception of bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma and carcinoid, newly diagnosed lung cancers with negative PET findings are usually early-stage diseases and are associated with a favorable prognosis, suggesting that indeterminate pulmonary nodules, which are PET-negative, can be managed conservatively with serial radiographic studies to monitor for signs of growth. These findings warrant further study and should be confirmed with sufficient follow-up in a large cohort of patients with PET-negative lung lesions.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Pulmonary nodules are a common radiographic finding and often require further evaluation because of the concern for lung cancer. The management of these indeterminate lesions depends on a number of factors including radiologic appearance, patient age, smoking history, and medical history. Over the past several years, positron emission tomography (PET) with FDG has been used to evaluate pulmonary abnormalities and has proven to be an effective technique in differentiating benign from malignant lung lesions. Most series have shown that PET has a high sensitivity for malignant tumors and that most lung cancers have increased FDG uptake.

The negative predictive value of an FDG PET scan also appears to be clinically useful [14], although several studies have described false-negative PET results in patients with primary lung cancer, most notably bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma and carcinoid tumors [510].

To our knowledge, few data have been published, however, on the clinical significance of a false-negative PET lesion that later proves to be malignant [11]. Thus, in an effort to determine the natural history of patients with PET-negative lung cancer, this study retrospectively reviewed the stage and prognosis of indeterminate pulmonary nodules that were interpreted as negative on PET and subsequently proven to be a primary lung malignancy.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Eligibility Criteria
All patients undergoing PET at our institution for an indeterminate lung lesion and possible lung cancer from November 1994 to August 2002 were considered eligible. A total of 3,912 cases of PET for a thoracic abnormality suspicious for primary or recurrent lung cancer were found. Of these cases, we identified 20 patients with biopsy-proven primary lung tumor and a negative PET study before any therapy. Fifteen women and five men ages 33–77 years (mean, 61 years) were included in the study, which was approved by our institutional review board.

Conventional Imaging
CT of the chest was available for review in 13 patients (65%), and reports of CT scans obtained at outside institutions were available in the others. Because of the retrospective nature of the study, the CT scans were obtained on several scanners using a variety of scanning techniques (collimation, 5–10 mm). The size of the primary tumor and the presence of lymphadenopathy, pleural disease, and all other abnormalities were recorded. These studies were used to localize the abnormalities of interest on the FDG PET studies but were interpreted separately from the FDG PET scans.

PET
PET was begun approximately 30 min after IV injection of FDG. PET was performed on an Advance system (General Electric Medical Systems) in 2D acquisition mode. Before January 2000, nonattenuation-corrected scans were initially obtained for 4 min per bed position from the level of the base of the brain through the middle of the thighs. A two-bed position attenuation-corrected regional chest scan was then performed using 8 min for the emission scan and 10 min for the transmission scan at each bed position. The images were reconstructed using a Hann filter with a cutoff of 0.71 cm.

PET studies performed after January 2000 used emission images obtained for 4 min per bed position from the level of the base of the brain through the middle of the thighs. Transmission images using a Germanium-68 rod source were then obtained for 2 min 30 sec per bed position. The images were reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation maximization (two iterations) and segmented attenuation correction. Reconstructed images had a matrix of 128 x 128 x 35 with 4.30 x 4.30 x 4.25 mm voxels. The axial, coronal, sagittal, and maximum intensity projection were reviewed on the vendor-supplied workstation.

All PET studies were interpreted by visual inspection and considered positive if tumor activity was greater than background mediastinal activity and negative if tumor activity was the same as or less than background mediastinal activity [12]. Although not usual practice at our institution, in eight PET studies a three-pixel diameter circular region of interest was placed on the axial PET image in the tumor on the slice with the maximum pixel value. After correction for radioactive decay, the region of interest was calculated according to the following formula:

where SUV is the standardized uptake value, ROI is the mean measured activity in the region of interest in millicuries per milliliter, ID is the injected dose in millicuries, and W is the body weight in grams. PET studies with standardized uptake values greater than 2.5 were considered positive. When the standardized uptake value and visual inspection were not concordant, the standardized uptake value was used to make the final determination of positive or negative. The reports of PET studies were used for this review because the original studies were not reviewed again.

Tumor Size, Histology, Stage Distribution, and Survival
Medical records from all 20 patients were reviewed to confirm the size, histology, and stage of disease at the time of presentation. A final pathologic stage was assigned to each case based on the TNM classification of the International System for Staging Lung Cancer, using the standard practice [13]. Patient records were reviewed to determine survival status.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
CT Findings
All patients had focal lesions in the lung suspicious for lung cancer. Nineteen of the 20 patients had a single indeterminate pulmonary nodule. The size of the primary lesion on CT was reported for 17 of the 19 patients; two primary lesions (12%) were less than 1 cm in maximum dimension, seven lesions (41%) were greater than or equal to 1 cm and less than 2 cm, and eight lesions (47%) were greater than or equal to 2 cm and less than or equal to 3 cm. Four patients (20%) had primary lesions determined in the final pathologic analysis to be less than 1 cm in greatest dimension. Mean tumor size on CT was 1.58 cm (standard deviation [SD], 0.71; range, 0.3–2.6 cm). Two patients (10%) had enlarged perihilar lymph nodes on CT, but these were determined to be benign on biopsy. No other significant abnormalities were found. One of the 20 patients had progressive multifocal heterogeneous opacity in the both lungs, consistent with bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma. Neither lymphadenopathy nor pleural disease was present in this patient.

PET
All patients had minimal or no significant FDG uptake in their primary lung lesion. No patient had increased FDG uptake in regional hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes or any other areas of abnormal FDG activity extrinsic to the lung. Standardized uptake values were reported for eight patients (40%). The mean standardized uptake value was 1.6 (SD, 0.4; range, 1.2–2.4).

Indication for Biopsy
Three patients (15%) had biopsy and confirmation of lung cancer before PET with a delay of less than 6 weeks. The other 17 patients (85%) had a definitive diagnosis of lung cancer 1–238 days after PET (mean, 78 days). In 15 (88%) of the 17 cases, the pathologic diagnosis of lung cancer was established as part of a surgical resection procedure. Tissue diagnosis was obtained in all patients for a variety of reasons: persistent pulmonary nodule in asymptomatic patient (n = 11, 55%), suspected primary lung cancer (n = 3, 15%), unresolving pneumonia (n = 2, 10%), presurgical staging of presumed metastatic lung nodule (n = 2, 10%), and diagnosis of indeterminate pulmonary lung nodule before inclusion on organ transplant list (n = 2, 10%).

Histology
All patients had tissue diagnosis of primary lung cancer. Tumor histology included adenocarcinoma (n = 7, 35%), bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma (n = 6, 30%), carcinoid (n = 3, 15%), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 2, 10%), otherwise unspecified non–small cell lung cancer (n = 1, 5%), and sarcomatoid neoplasm (n = 1, 5%).

Tumor Staging
Eighteen (90%) of the 20 patients were staged at the time of surgical resection. All of these patients had pathologic T1 N0 M0 stage IA (n = 14, 70%) or pathologic T2 N0 M0 stage IB (n = 4, 20%) disease (Fig. 1A, 1B). Two patients did not have surgical intervention. One patient was diagnosed with stage IV multifocal bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma with contralateral lung metastases seen on CT. This patient had slowly progressive pulmonary lesions over a 3-year period, but no evidence for extrathoracic disease (Fig. 2A, 2B). The other nonsurgical patient died from cardiac arrest within 1 week of diagnosis and had a clinical T2 N0 M0 stage IB lung cancer that was 0.3 cm in largest dimension on CT. Seventeen (94%) of the 18 patients who underwent surgical resection had concomitant resection of at least one regional lymph node. All patients were N0. Metastasis in the lung was found in one patient (5%) with the multifocal bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma. No other patients had metastatic disease.



View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 68-year-old woman who presented with indeterminate right upper lobe nodule. Axial CT scan shows slightly lobular 1.3-cm right upper lobe nodule (arrow). No other abnormalities were identified.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 68-year-old woman who presented with indeterminate right upper lobe nodule. Axial positron emission tomography scan in same region as A shows no significant uptake in nodule (arrow). Normal background mediastinal activity is minimal. Because of concern for malignancy, patient underwent surgical resection, and pathology revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma.

 


View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 71-year-old woman who presented with progressive heterogeneous opacities in lung. Axial CT scan shows scattered heterogeneous opacities with areas of more consolidation in left mid lung (arrow). Note poorly defined focal opacity in right mid lung.

 


View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 71-year-old woman who presented with progressive heterogeneous opacities in lung. Coronal FDG positron emission tomography scan shows minimal uptake (arrow) in left lung equal to background mediastinal activity. Note normal activity in left ventricular myocardium (arrowhead). Bronchoscopy revealed bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma.

 

Prognosis and Survival
Surgical resection was deemed curative in all 18 cases, and no patient received adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Fifteen patients (83%) had postsurgical follow-up at our institution. None of these patients is known to have tumor recurrence at a mean follow-up of 24 months (range, 2–61 months). Three patients (17%) have been free of disease for 5 years after resection, and five other patients (28%) have been free of disease for at least 2 years after resection. Three of the 20 patients (15%), including the one patient with multifocal bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma, were lost to follow-up within 1 week of resection (n = 2) or PET (n = 1). One patient was discharged from follow-up 5 years after resection.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Over the last decade, PET has emerged as a powerful diagnostic tool in the evaluation of patients with indeterminate pulmonary lesions detected on conventional imaging studies. The high sensitivity of PET with FDG is presumably because of a fundamental property of tumor cells: increased glucose metabolism. This feature has been successfully used to differentiate benign from malignant lesions and to guide patient treatment. According to a recent meta-analysis, PET has a sensitivity of approximately 97% in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules [1]. The specificity, however, is suboptimal, because some benign pulmonary abnormalities have increased FDG uptake. Thus, most patients with pulmonary lesions and elevated FDG activity are considered to have a malignancy until proven otherwise, and tissue sampling is usually recommended.

Conversely, the high negative predictive value suggests that most patients with pulmonary lesions and no significant FDG uptake have a benign abnormality. These patients are typically followed up with sequential imaging studies rather than having an immediate interventional procedure to establish a diagnosis. Two well-known exceptions are bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma and carcinoid tumors, and reports of PET-negative lung cancers predict these disease subtypes will be more biologically indolent than malignancies found to be positive on PET [711].

This study specifically addressed the issue of stage and outcome in lung cancer patients who had negative findings on PET scans, to provide support for current management recommendations. The results showed that nearly all PET-negative lung malignancies were stage I, with most of those being stage IA. These patients had a high rate of curative surgical resection and excellent long-term clinical outcome. Therefore, the results of this study confirm that careful follow-up of patients with lung lesions and negative PET findings is a reasonable diagnostic strategy. If the pulmonary abnormality grows, then a biopsy should be performed because an indolent lung cancer is possible. The delay in diagnosis while following up lesions does not appear to compromise patient outcome. The one patient with advanced multifocal bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma already had diffuse disease at the time of the negative PET finding, and a delay in diagnosis did not affect prognosis.

This study is subject to certain limitations because of its retrospective nature. Many patients receiving PET scans at our institution were referred for PET only. Therefore, information about clinical course and long-term follow-up were not available in all patients. The number of patients with an indeterminate nodule and negative PET findings who actually had a malignancy is unknown because most of these patients are followed up outside of our institution. Unless a tissue diagnosis is established in all cases, this source of bias may artificially inflate the sensitivity and negative predictive value of PET.

Several investigators have commented on potential limitations of PET in the evaluation of small nodules less than 1 cm. Subcentimeter lesions may be predisposed to false-negative results on PET, either because of technical limitations of PET or low overall tumor cell volume [14]. Although this study had a small number of patients, the occurrence of falsely negative subcentimeter nodules appears to depend more on their inherent biologic indolence than on their size [11]. Three primary tumors (15%) in this series were less than 1 cm on pathology, and one tumor (5%) was less than 1 cm on CT. All four tumors were either stage IA or IB, suggesting PET-negative subcentimeter primary lung tumors behave no differently from larger tumors that have no significant FDG activity.

In conclusion, our data suggest a possible strategy of clinical management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules in patients with false-negative findings on PET. Any indeterminate pulmonary nodules in patients with clinical or radiographic findings suspicious for bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma or carcinoid should be followed up closely or should undergo biopsy. In this subpopulation, physicians involved in FDG PET interpretation are advised to correlate imaging data with the CT pattern. In all other cases, PET-negative nodules can be managed conservatively. These nodules may be safely followed up with serial chest radiographs or CT scans to determine changes in size. In those patients with a negative PET finding who later prove to have a primary lung cancer, the disease is usually slow-growing and amenable to curative resection.

The aforementioned strategy holds promise for minimizing morbidity and mortality from invasive procedures while maintaining a low risk of mortality from lung cancer. These recommendations warrant further investigation and confirmation in a larger study with appropriate follow-up in the entire population of patients with PET-negative lung lesions.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Gould M, Maclean C, Kuschner W, Rydzak C, Owens D. Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA2001; 285:914 –924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hain SF, Curran KM, Beggs AD, Fogelman I, O'Doherty MJ, Maisey MN. FDG-PET as a "metabolic biopsy" tool in thoracic lesions with indeterminate biopsy. Eur J Nucl Med2001; 28:1336 –1340[Medline]
  3. Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med2003; 348:2535 –2542[Free Full Text]
  4. Stroobants S, Verschakelen J, Vansteenkiste J. Value of FDG-PET in the management of non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Radiol 2003;45:49 –59[Medline]
  5. Lowe VJ, Fletcher JW, Gobar L, et al. Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:1075 –1084[Abstract]
  6. Berger KL, Nicholson SA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA. FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: correlation of FDG uptake with histopathological features. AJR2000; 174:1005 –1008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kim B, Kim Y, Lee K, et al. Localized form of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: FDG PET findings. AJR1998; 170:935 –939[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Seki H, et al. Fluorine-18-FDG PET imaging is negative in bronchioloalveolar lung carcinoma. J Nucl Med 1998;39:1016 –1020[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Erasmus J, McAdams H, Patz EF Jr, Coleman R, Ahuja V, Goodman P. Evaluation of primary pulmonary carcinoid tumors using FDG PET. AJR 1998;170:1369 –1373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Heyneman LE, Patz EF Jr. PET imaging in patients with bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma. Lung Cancer2002; 38:261 –266[Medline]
  11. Marom EM, Sarvis S, Herndon JE, Patz EF Jr. T1 lung cancers: sensitivity of diagnosis with fluoro-deoxyglucose PET. Radiology2002; 223:453 –459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lowe VJ, Hoffman JM, DeLong DM, Patz EF, Coleman RE. Semiquantitative and visual analysis of FDG-PET images in pulmonary abnormalities. J Nucl Med1994; 35:1771 –1776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Mountain C. Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. Chest1997; 111:1710 –1717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Keyes JW. SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med 1995;36:1836 –1839[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
M. K. Gould, J. Fletcher, M. D. Iannettoni, W. R. Lynch, D. E. Midthun, D. P. Naidich, and D. E. Ost
Evaluation of Patients With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer?: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 108S - 130S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. M. Blodgett, C. C. Meltzer, and D. W. Townsend
PET/CT: Form and Function
Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 360 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. H. O, I. R. Yoo, S. H. Kim, H. S. Sohn, and S. K. Chung
Clinical Significance of Small Pulmonary Nodules with Little or No 18F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT Images of Patients with Nonthoracic Malignancies
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 15 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Kono, K. Fujimoto, H. Terasaki, N. L. Muller, S. Kato, J. Sadohara, N. Hayabuchi, and S. Takamori
Dynamic MRI of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison of Enhancement Patterns of Malignant and Benign Small Peripheral Lung Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 26 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Pasic, H. A. Brokx, E. F. Comans, G. J. Herder, E. K. Risse, O. S. Hoekstra, P. E. Postmus, and T. G. Sutedja
Detection and Staging of Preinvasive Lesions and Occult Lung Cancer in the Central Airways with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography: A Pilot Study
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 11(17): 6186 - 6189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheran, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Patz, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheran, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Patz, E. F., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS