AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ersoy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ersoy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:1181-1186
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Blood Pool MR Angiography of Aortic Stent-Graft Endoleak

Hale Ersoy1, Paula Jacobs2, Craig K. Kent3 and Martin R. Prince1

1 Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 416 E 55th St., New York, NY 10021.
2 Advanced Magnetics, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02138.
3 Department of Vascular Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021.

Received December 18, 2002; accepted after revision November 11, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to M. R. Prince.

Supported by Advanced Magnetics, Inc.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our research was to investigate the value of a blood pool contrast agent in detecting endoleaks on MR angiography after endoluminal stent-graft repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms.

CONCLUSION. Blood pool MR angiography using Ferumoxytol reveals more aortic stent-graft endoleaks than does CT angiography and depicts more endoleaks 24 hr after administration than during the immediate arterial phase because of a 50-fold increase in the volume of enhancement in the aneurysmal sac outside the stent-graft.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Placement of aortic stent-grafts allows percutaneous treatment of aortic aneurysms, thus eliminating the risks associated with major abdominal surgery. When imaging performed after stent-graft placement shows the diameter of the aneurysm has decreased, the treatment is considered successful. If the size of the aneurysm remains unchanged or is enlarged, an endoleak might be present.

The term "endoleak" refers to persistent blood flow into the aneurysmal sac after stent-graft placement [1]. Large endoleaks may be detected on arterial phase MR angiography or CT angiography, but small or slow endoleaks may not be visible immediately after contrast injection. Delayed CT angiography or MRI allows more time for the contrast agent to enter the endoleak [2, 3]; however, redistribution of iodine or gadolinium contrast agents into the extracellular fluid compartment and excretion of these agents degrade delayed images. Blood pool contrast agents allow delayed MR images without degradation to be obtained. Although the United States Food and Drug Administration has not yet approved blood pool contrast agents for clinical use, we had the opportunity to test one, Ferumoxytol (Advanced Magnetics), as part of a phase II study.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
We invited aortic stent-graft patients to undergo MR angiography with Ferumoxytol, an iron oxide–based blood pool contrast agent. Seven patients (six men, one woman) who ranged in age from 62 to 83 years volunteered. Inclusion criteria were agreement to undergo complete blood testing and MRI within 2 days. Exclusion criteria were claustrophobia, a pacemaker, or other contraindication to MRI; pregnancy; allergy to dextran or iron-containing compounds; and having received injection of an investigational drug within 30 days or of another contrast agent within 2 hr. No volunteer was excluded. The local institutional review board approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from every subject. The interval between stent-graft placement and blood pool MR angiography was 6–18 months (mean, 13 months).

Iron Oxide
The blood pool contrast agent that we used was Ferumoxytol. This agent consists of an ultrasmall (~30 nm) superparamagnetic iron oxide core encapsulated in semisynthetic carbohydrate. This thick coating prevents redistribution outside the vascular space. Blood elimination is via phagocytosis by macrophages in the reticuloendothelial system. The plasma elimination half-life in humans is approximately 10–14 hr. Iron released after phagocytosis enters the body's iron stores.

Patients received Ferumoxytol at a dose of 4 mg of iron per kilogram of body weight. Contrast injection was performed manually at a rate of 1 mL/sec and was followed immediately by a 20-mL saline flush using a tubing set that switched automatically between contrast agent and saline flush (SmartSet, TopSpins).

Imaging Technique
All patients were imaged on a 1.5-T unit (CVI, General Electric Medical Systems). The body coil was used for signal transmission and a phased array coil for reception. We used a 48 x 28 cm phased array coil (ICG, Medical Advances) on the first four patients, but this device caused significant superior-to-inferior wraparound ghosting artifact on axial 3D gradient-echo images. Accordingly, for the last three patients, we used a smaller phased array coil (Torso coil, MedRad) that offered less superior-to-inferior coverage but matched the axial 3D volume of imaging.

In the first four patients, we performed unenhanced and arterial phase 3D MR angiography in the coronal plane with the following parameters: TR/TE, 5/1; field of view, 40 cm; slice thickness, 3.0 mm with 1.5 mm of overlap; flip angle, 30°; acquisition matrix, 512 x 160–192; and elliptical centric k-space view ordering. We performed delayed imaging at 8–23 min (mean, 14 min) and 24 hr in the axial plane with a smaller field of view (34 cm); more slices (n = 40); thicker slices (8–10 mm) reconstructed at 4- to 5-mm intervals using zero interpolation; sequential ordering of k-space; and fewer phase-encoded steps, both with and without fat suppression. Imaging at 8–23 min and at 24 hr was performed with identical imaging parameters for each subject. The variation in the time of the initial delayed imaging (8–23 min) reflected the variable amount of time necessary to acquire vital signs after injection and blood sampling. The longest delay (23 min) occurred because the scanner computer failed during a study of one patient, resulting in extra time needed for rebooting and relocalization. If motion or poor breath-holding degraded image quality, we repeated imaging until we achieved satisfactory results. Fat suppression was performed with a spectrospatial inversion pulse applied once per slice loop with an inversion time of 17–20 msec.

MR Angiography Image Analysis
A radiologist unacquainted with any clinical information reviewed the MR angiography studies on a computer workstation (Vitrea, Vital Images) to determine the volume of the aneurysm and the possibility of endoleak. The location and volume and the rate of the endoleak were determined on arterial and delayed phase (8–23 min and 24 hr, respectively) 3D MR angiograms. Volume was calculated by adding the contrast-enhanced cross-sectional area for each slice when contrast agent was observed in the aneurysmal sac outside the graft lumen and by multiplying that value by slice spacing. The rate of the endoleak was calculated as the ratio of endoleak volume (in milliliters) on equilibrium phase images divided by the time from Ferumoxytol injection to equilibrium phase imaging. The rate of endoleak was calculated for the 8- to 23-min point in the four patients with an endoleak detected on early phase images and for the 24-hr time point in all patients.

CT Angiography
CT angiography, including arterial phase and delayed phase imaging, was performed on a helical CT scanner (LightSpeed Plus, LightSpeed Ultra, or LightSpeed QX/i, General Electric Medical Systems). A 2.5-mm slice thickness was used, and 150 mL of iohexol (Omnipaque 350 I mg/mL, Amersham) was injected at a rate of 4 mL/sec.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
MR angiography was technically successful in six of seven patients. The failure occurred in a patient who had undergone emergency tube graft repair of a rupturing abdominal aortic aneurysm in 1986 followed by repair of a recurrent anastomotic aneurysm, using a combination of a uniiliac Ivancev-Malmo stent-graft and a femoral–femoral crossover graft, in 1999. In our study of this patient, the metal surgical clips and ferromagnetic stents caused severe artifacts that obscured the infrarenal aorta and common iliac arteries. This patient was excluded from further analysis. The six technically successful stent-graft placements were all nitinol stent-grafts (AneuRx, Medtronic; or EVT/Ancure, Guidant). No adverse events or complications related to Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI occurred.

The maximum diameter of the aneurysm before treatment with aortic stent-grafting was between 4.4 and 6.5 cm (mean, 5.0 cm). After stent-graft placement, the size of the aneurysm decreased in two patients and showed no significant change in three patients. In the last patient, 1-month follow-up CT angiography revealed a rapid type II endoleak that had increased the maximum diameter of the aneurysm from 4.7 to 6.1 cm. The size of the aneurysm had stabilized at 2 years of follow-up, and this patient continues to be monitored.

The period of time between the initial stent-graft placement and the most recent CT angiography examination varied from 120 to 630 days (mean, 305 days), and the mean time interval between the last CT angiography and blood pool MR angiography was 90 days (range, 5–203 days).

Endoleak volumes and rates are shown in Table 1. In two patients, CT angiography studies showed an endoleak. Iron oxide–enhanced MR angiography revealed the endoleak during the arterial phase after the iron oxide injection and showed the endoleak location to be similar to its location on CT angiography (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C). The rates of endoleak were high—0.5 and 0.3 mL/min. For these two patients with endoleak detected on CT angiography, the endoleak appeared larger on arterial phase CT angiography than on arterial phase MR angiography. This discrepancy may relate to the relatively longer delay between initiating contrast injection and arterial phase scanning in CT angiography than in MR angiography.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Size of Aneurysms, Volumes of Endoleaks, and Rates of Endoleaks

 


View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 77-year-old man with aortic nitinol stent-graft. Arterial phase axial CT scan shows endoleak (arrow [area outlined in black]).

 


View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 77-year-old man with aortic nitinol stent-graft. Axial 3D iron oxide–enhanced MR angiogram obtained 23 min after contrast initialization shows endoleak (solid arrow [area outlined in white]) at level corresponding to that shown in A. Note wraparound ghosting artifact (open arrow) in slice direction.

 


View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 77-year-old man with aortic nitinol stent-graft. MR angiogram obtained 24 hr after A reveals increased volume of endoleak (solid arrow [area outlined in white]) at same level as that shown in A and B. This method was used to determine the area on every scan with contrast extravasation into aneurysmal sac for calculating endoleak volume. Note wraparound ghosting artifact (open arrow) in slice direction.

 

In one patient with an endoleak shown on CT angiography, an endoleak at the proximal segment of the graft was seen on intraarterial digital subtraction angiography performed at the time of stent-graft placement. Although the endoleak could not be corrected with repeated balloon inflation, it was small enough that conversion to open surgical repair was not performed.

In the other patient with an endoleak shown on CT angiography, intraarterial digital subtraction angiography was performed 7 months later and revealed patent lumbar arteries at two levels (L4 and L5) serving as feeder vessels to the aneurysmal sac. Coil embolization was performed, but the endoleak persisted after the procedure because of another patent lumbar artery. CT angiography and, 5 days later, blood pool MR angiography (Fig. 1D) identified this endoleak as type II with a feeding lumbar artery.



View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 77-year-old man with aortic nitinol stent-graft. Endoleak (straight arrow) is larger on this delayed phase (23 min) than on arterial phase image shown in A, and feeder lumbar artery (curved arrow) is visible.

 

In the four patients with no endoleak shown on CT angiography, blood pool agent MR angiography revealed an endoleak. In one of these patients, CT angiography was of poor quality with only minimal arterial enhancement (Fig. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D). For two patients with negative CT angiography results, the endoleaks were detected only on delayed MR angiograms obtained 24 hr after iron oxide administration (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C). The endoleak rate in these two patients was extremely slow— 0.003 and 0.0007 mL/min. For the remaining patient with false-negative results on CT angiography, the endoleak was small on the arterial phase acquisition but was larger at 24 hr after Ferumoxytol injection, with an endoleak rate of only 0.1 mL/min.



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 81-year-old man with nitinol stent-graft. Arterial phase CT angiogram does not reveal endoleak, but arterial enhancement is poor.

 


View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 81-year-old man with nitinol stent-graft. Axial source scan of arterial phase iron oxide–enhanced 3D MR angiogram shows early endoleak (arrow).

 


View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. 81-year-old man with nitinol stent-graft. Subsequent 15-min (C) and 24-hr (D) equilibrium phase MR angiograms with fat suppression show endoleak (arrows) is gradually increasing in size.

 


View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D. 81-year-old man with nitinol stent-graft. Subsequent 15-min (C) and 24-hr (D) equilibrium phase MR angiograms with fat suppression show endoleak (arrows) is gradually increasing in size.

 


View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 67-year-old man with slow endoleak. CT angiogram shows negative findings for endoleak.

 


View larger version (176K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 67-year-old man with slow endoleak. Axial 24-hr blood pool MR angiogram shows slow endoleak (arrows).

 


View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. 67-year-old man with slow endoleak. Arterial phase sagittal subvolume maximum-intensity-projection scan shows patent inferior mesenteric artery (arrow), an endoleak feeder vessel.

 

The small number of subjects did not allow systematic testing of the imaging parameters. However, we found the axial orientation to be superior to coronal for identifying the anatomic structures and detecting endoleaks, and fat saturation to be useful for eliminating wraparound ghosting artifact in the slice direction and helping to distinguish endoleak from background tissues. Finally, the reformations and subvolume maximum intensity projections performed on the computer workstation were deemed essential for adequately evaluating the endoleak, especially for identifying feeding arteries.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Standard iodinated contrast agents cannot reliably detect subtle, intermittent, or gradual extravasation of blood from the intravascular space [4]. In comparison, blood pool contrast agents, characterized by a long plasma-elimination half-life, have more time to accumulate visibly in the extravascular space [57]. Although iron oxide is ordinarily removed rapidly from the circulatory system by phagocytosis, when coated in semisynthetic carbohydrate (Ferumoxytol), its elimination half-life is extended to 14 hr so it becomes an ideal compound for detecting internal bleeding.

Iron oxide MR angiography has been shown to be useful for detecting bleeding into the bowel lumen in animal models [810]. Our study of six patients with nitinol aortic stent-grafts indicates that iron oxide blood pool contrast agents are useful in illuminating subtle aortic stent-graft endoleaks that neither CT angiography nor intraarterial digital subtraction angiography detected. In these cases, iron oxide MR angiography revealed the location and volume of the endoleak and its feeder vessels. Furthermore, repeated MR angiography over 24 hr produced data from which the endoleak rate could be calculated.

No gold standard for detecting endoleak has been established, so we cannot be 100% certain of the diagnoses made on the basis of MR angiography. However, four of the six patients who were determined to have an endoleak showed no reduction in aneurysm size after stent-graft placement, as would be expected if the aneurysmal sac had thrombosed. For the two patients whose aneurysm diameter did decrease (indicating a reduction in endotension), both had slow endoleak rates (<= 0.1 mL/min) and small endoleak volumes (3.3 and 5.1 mL). With one exception, the slower endoleaks (<= 0.1 mL/min) were undetected on CT angiography, the one exception being a poor-quality CT angiography study with poor arterial enhancement that was interpreted as showing "negative" findings for endoleak.

In this small series, none of the cases of endoleak positively diagnosed in volunteer subjects progressed to aneurysm rupture. However, if an aneurysm enlarges, prudent management includes ongoing imaging follow-up and intervention. Determining the clinical significance of CT-occult endoleaks or the definitive MRI measurements of endoleak rate will require outcomes studies performed on a larger population.

We had wondered whether this study was inherently biased by the requirement of voluntary participation because patients who suspected an existing endoleak might have been more likely to volunteer for complimentary scanning and perhaps the incidence of endoleak in this study was greater than in the general population of stent-graft patients. However, we now think that stent-graft endoleak rates are substantially higher than the incidence predicted on the basis of CT angiography data and that blood pool MR angiography with Ferumoxytol represents a promising method for better detection and characterization of these endoleaks.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Advanced Magnetics, Inc., for financial support and technical assistance for this study.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. White GH, Yu W, May J, Chaufour X, Stephen MS. Endoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, incidence, diagnosis, and management. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:152 –168[Medline]
  2. Rozenblit A, Marin ML, Veith FJ, Cynamon J, Wahl SI, Bakal CW. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of postoperative follow-up with helical CT. AJR1995; 165:1473 –1479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Golzarian J, Dussaussois L, Abada HT, et al. Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stent-graft therapy: value of biphasic acquisition. AJR 1998;171:329 –331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wicky S, Fan CM, Geller SC, Greenfield A, Santilli J, Waltmann AC. MR angiography of endoleak with inconclusive concomitant CT angiography. AJR 2003;181:736 –738[Free Full Text]
  5. Anzai Y, Prince MR, Chenevert TL, et al. MR angiography with an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide blood pool agent. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:209 –214[Medline]
  6. Ahlstrom KH, Johansson LO, Rodenburg JB, Ragnarsson AS, Akeson P, Borseth A. Pulmonary MR angiography with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles as a blood pool agent and a navigator echo for respiratory gating: pilot study. Radiology1999; 211:865 –869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mayo-Smith WW, Saini S, Slater G, Kaufman JA, Sharma P, Hahn PF. MR contrast for vascular enhancement: value of superparamagnetic iron oxide. AJR 1996;166:73 –77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hilfiker PR, Zimmermann-Paul GG, Schmidt M, Klotz HP, Kacl GM, Debatin JF. Intestinal and peritoneal bleeding: detection with an intravascular contrast agent and fast three-dimensional MRI—preliminary experience from an experimental study. Radiology1998; 209:769 –774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Weishaupt D, Hetzer FH, Ruehm SG, Patak MA, Schmidt M, Debatin JF. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MRI using an intravascular contrast agent for detection of traumatic intra-abdominal hemorrhage and abdominal parenchymal injuries: an experimental study. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1958 –1964[Medline]
  10. Hilfiker PR, Weishaupt D, Kacl GM, et al. Comparison of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in conjunction with a blood pool contrast agent and nuclear scintigraphy for the detection of experimentally induced gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut1999; 45:581 –587[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. W. Stavropoulos and S. R. Charagundla
Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 641 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Li, J. Salanitri, S. Tutton, E. E. Dunkle, J. R. Schneider, J. A. Caprini, L. N. Pierchala, P. M. Jacobs, and R. R. Edelman
Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis: Evaluation with Ferumoxytol-enhanced MR Imaging and Dual-Contrast Mechanism--Preliminary Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 873 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
P. V. Prasad
Functional MRI of the kidney: tools for translational studies of pathophysiology of renal disease
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): F958 - F974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Eggebrecht, H. Kuhl, G. M. Kaiser, S. Aker, M. O. Zenge, F. Stock, F. Breuckmann, F. Grabellus, M. E. Ladd, R. H. Mehta, et al.
Feasibility of real-time magnetic resonance-guided stent-graft placement in a swine model of descending aortic dissection
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2006; 27(5): 613 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ersoy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ersoy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS