AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:1295-1300
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Using MRI to Evaluate Anatomic Significance of Aortic Bifurcation, Right Renal Artery, and Conus Medullaris When Locating Lumbar Vertebral Segments

Chang Hee Lee1, Bo Kyoung Seo1, Young Chil Choi1, Hyun Joon Shin1, Jeong Hee Park1, Hae Jeong Jeon1, Kyeong Ah Kim2, Cheol Min Park2 and Baek Hyun Kim2

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Konkuk, Chung-Ju Hospital, 620-5 Kyohyun-Dong, Chung-Ju City, Chung-Buk 380-704, South Korea.
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Korea, Kuro Hospital, 80 Guro-Dong, Guro-Ku, Seoul 151-050, South Korea.

Received September 17, 2003; accepted after revision November 17, 2003.

 
Supported by the academic research fund of Konkuk University in 2003.

Presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society, San Diego, CA.

Address correspondence to C. H. Lee (chlee86{at}kku.ac.kr).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated the anatomic significance and sites of aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris when locating lumbar vertebral segments on MRI.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The study group was composed of 210 patients who underwent MRI of the lumbosacral spine. The position of aortic bifurcation was evaluated using MRI. Midline and sagittal MRI were also assessed to identify the proximal portion of the right renal artery and the tip of the conus medullaris. These locations were recorded in relation to the upper or lower half of the adjacent vertebral body or the adjacent intervertebral disk space.

RESULTS. The most common site of aortic bifurcation was at the L4 vertebra (83%). In most patients two separated iliac arteries were apparent at the level of the L4–L5 disk space (93%), and the right renal artery was located between the lower half of the L1 vertebra and the upper half of the L2 vertebra (92%). The position of the conus medullaris was variably located, and the most frequent site was at the L1 vertebra (56%).

CONCLUSION. The aortic bifurcation, the right renal artery, and the combination of these structures can be reliable landmarks for determining the lumbar vertebral segments on MRI or CT. However, conus medullaris cannot be considered a good landmark because of its variable locations.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The exact localization of the vertebral segments on MRI of the lumbar spine is important. However, because of the existence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra, prevalent in 3–21% of patients [13], selection of the position of the lumbar vertebral segments is often inaccurate when done using MRI alone.

Usually, lumbosacral spine radiographs are used for identifying lumbar vertebral segments. In several methods for numbering the lumbar vertebrae on lumbosacral radiographs [4, 5], the transverse diameter of the pedicle and the interpedicular distance are frequently largest at the L5 vertebra. Likewise, the L3 vertebra usually exhibits the longest transverse process of all lumbar segments, and the size of the neural foramen gradually increases to the last lumbar vertebra. The iliac wings are also generally found between the L4 and L5 vertebrae.

If the radiograph is not available, the paraspinal structures are necessary landmarks for the exact localization of lumbar vertebral segments on MRI. For instance, various structures such as the aortic bifurcation [68], inferior vena cava confluence [7], renal artery [9, 10], conus medullaris [11, 12], superior mesenteric artery, psoas muscles, pedicles, neural foramen, and iliolumbar ligament [13] can be observed on lumbar MRI, but only the aortic bifurcation, proximal right renal artery, and conus medullaris were consistently observed in our study. Although various articles on the anatomic locations of each of these three structures have been published [612], finding an article on selecting the location of lumbar vertebrae through anatomic location and traits is difficult.

Therefore, this study aimed to describe the anatomic location and significance of the aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris when locating lumbar vertebral segments on MRI. In addition, this study examined changes in the location of paraspinal structures and their differences with what is normal in the case of lumbosacral transitional vertebra.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This study included 210 patients (142 male and 68 female patients) who were referred for MRI of the lumbosacral spine from July 2001 to February 2003. Their mean age was 36 years (age range, 16–65 years). Cases with inadequate imaging and patients with spinal deformity, spinal trauma, aneurysmal dilatation of the abdominal aorta, extremely tortuous aorta, and multiple right renal arteries were excluded.

MR images were obtained with a 1.0-T scanner (Magnum, Medison). Imaging was performed with all the patients lying in a supine position using a Quad thoracolumbar spinal coil for the lumbar spine and a body coil for the cervicothoracic spine.

The MRI sequences performed on all the patients were sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo (TR/TE, 400/17; acquired signals, 2; slice thickness, 4 mm; field of view, 280 x 280 mm; matrix, 184 x 512 mm; acquisition time, 4 min 54 sec), sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,900/108; acquired signals, 3; slice thickness, 4 mm; field of view, 280 x 280 mm; matrix, 192 x 256 mm; acquisition time, 4 min 38 sec), and axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo (4,300/108; acquired signals, 3; slice thickness, 4 mm; field of view, 130 x 210 mm; matrix, 120 x 256 mm; acquisition time, 4 min 18 sec).

Cervicothoracic sagittal scout images were used as the gold standard for determining the numbering of the lumbar vertebral segments (Fig. 1A). These cervicothoracic sagittal scout images were made up of six sagittal images of T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging (2,700/108; acquired signals, 2; section thickness, 5 mm; matrix, 192 x 256 mm; intersection gap, 0.5 mm; field of view, 450 x 450 mm). These scout images included the C1–L1 vertebrae. An oil capsule was used as a skin marker at the level of the lower thoracic spine by palpating the xiphoid process located between the T10 and T11 vertebrae.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 28-year-old man who presented with lower back pain. Cervicothoracic sagittal scout MR image shows oil capsule (arrow) at upper half of T12 (arrowhead).

 

The vertebral level showed the oil capsule on the cervicothoracic sagittal scout image and on the sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo image of the lumbar spine to be in the same position (Figs. 1A and 1B), which enabled comparing the cervicothoracic sagittal scout image with the lumbar sagittal image and consequently determining the level. Specifically, the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral vertebrae were counted caudad from the C2 to the S1 vertebra, assuming that there were seven cervical and 12 thoracic vertebrae.



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 28-year-old man who presented with lower back pain. Sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo image of lumbar spine shows oil capsule (white arrow) at position seen in A. Note level of upper half of L4 vertebra (black arrow).

 

Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging was used to evaluate the aortic bifurcation. The routine axial scan was focused on the disk space of the lumbar spine. Toward this end, an additional axial study was performed on the vertebral body on top of the disk space in which both common iliac arteries were seen for the first time. The longest horizontal position before the aorta was bifurcated into both common iliac arteries was selected as the point of aortic bifurcation (Fig. 1C).



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 28-year-old man who presented with lower back pain. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo image shows aortic bifurcation (arrow) as longest horizontal position immediately before aorta bifurcates and becomes two common iliac arteries at upper half of L4 vertebra.

 

Sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo and sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo images were used in the study of the right renal artery. The proximal portion of the right renal artery was defined as a small round signal void at the right paracentral portion of the sagittal images (Fig. 2A). A line at the center of the proximal right renal artery was subtended to the adjacent vertebral body or intervertebral disk space, with the position defined in relation to the adjacent vertebra.



View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 51-year-old man with herniated disk at L4–L5 level. Sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo image shows proximal portion of right renal artery (arrow) in right paracentral portion as small round signal void at level of L1–L2 intervertebral disk space.

 

For conus medullaris, the tip of the conus was defined as the most distal point of the cord on the T1- and T2-weighted sagittal sequences (Fig. 2B). As in the case of the right renal artery, the location was selected by comparing the vertebral body or disk space when linking the vertical line with the long axis of the cord in the distal point of the spinal cord. The axial sequences were used to prevent the thickening of the filum terminale and its effects.



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 51-year-old man with herniated disk at L4–L5 level. In sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo image, tip of conus medullaris (arrow) is shown as most distal point of cord, at level of upper half of L2 vertebra.

 

The level of their locations was recorded in relation to the upper or lower half of the adjacent vertebral body or the adjacent intervertebral disk space, assuming that a disk was equal in height to half of a vertebra (Fig. 1B).

For purposes of statistical evaluation, each level was assigned a number; the T12–L1 intervertebral disk space was 1, and the upper half of the L5 vertebral body was 14. The bivariate correlation analysis with Pearson's correlation coefficient was performed to investigate the relationship of the aortic bifurcation with the right renal artery and with the conus medullaris. The Student's t test was also used to assess differences in parameters for age and sex. All p values less than 0.05 were considered a statistically significant difference.

Furthermore, the incidence of the lumbosacral transitional vertebra and the location distribution of paraspinal structures were examined by dividing the transitional vertebra into the lumbarization of S1 and sacralization of L5. Lumbarization refers to the condition in which the first sacral segment has the radiographic appearance of a lumbar vertebra. On the other hand, in sacralization, the lowest lumbar vertebra has some or all the anatomic characteristics of the first sacral segment [14]. Lumbosacral spine radiographs were also used for the evaluation on the transitional vertebra.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The aorta was bifurcated at the upper half of the L4 vertebral body in 94 patients (45%), at the lower half of L4 in 80 patients (38%), at the L3–L4 intervertebral disk space in 21 patients (10%), at the L4–L5 intervertebral disk space of the level in nine patients (4%), at the lower half of L3 in four patients (2%), and at the upper half of L5 in two patients (1%). The mean position of aortic bifurcation was at the upper half of L4 (mean, 11.3; standard deviation [SD], 0.81). The most common site of aortic bifurcation was at the level of the L4 vertebra (174 patients, 83%). In 195 patients (93%), two separated common iliac arteries were obvious at the level of the L4–L5 disk space.

The proximal portions of the right renal artery were situated at the L1–L2 intervertebral disk space in 109 patients (52%), at the lower half of the L1 vertebral body in 68 patients (32%), at the upper half of L1 in 15 patients (7%), at the upper half of L2 in 17 patients (8%), and at the T12–L1 intervertebral disk space in one patient. The mean position of the proximal right renal artery was at the lower half of L1 (mean, 3.6; SD, 0.78). In most patients (92%), the proximal portion of the right renal artery was located between the lower half of the L1 vertebra and the upper half of the L2 vertebra.

The conus medullaris was variably located at the lower half of the L1 vertebral body in 62 patients (30%), at the upper half of L1 in 57 patients (27%), at the L1–L2 intervertebral disk space in 55 patients (26%), at the upper half of L2 in 30 patients (14%), and at the intervertebral disk space of T12–L1 in six patients (3%). The mean position of conus medullaris was at the lower half of L1 (mean, 3.2; SD, 1.1).

The Pearson's correlation (r = 0.535, p = 0.00001) between the aortic bifurcation and the right renal artery revealed a more significant positive correlation than the relationship (r = 0.138, p = 0.1337) between the aortic bifurcation and conus medullaris. Thus, the right renal artery was located at a more caudal level as the point of aortic bifurcation descended. No significant difference in the paraspinal structures was observed between male and female patients or with increasing age (p > 0.05).

Of the 210 patients, transitional vertebrae were seen in 20 patients (9.5%), lumbarization of S1 in 11 patients (5.2%; male-to-female ratio, 4:7), and sacralization of L5 in nine patients (4.3%; male-to-female ratio, 7:2).

Of the 11 cases of S1 lumbarization, nine cases were aortic bifurcations at the lower half of L4; the upper half of L4 and the L4–L5 intervertebral disk space accounted for one case each. The right renal artery was at the L1–L2 intervertebral disk space in six patients, at the upper half of L2 in four patients, and at the lower half of L1 in one patient. In the case of conus medullaris, seven cases of it were found at the upper half of L2, three cases at the L1–L2 intervertebral disk space, and one case at the lower half of L1.

Of the nine cases of L5 sacralization, aortic bifurcation was at the L3–L4 intervertebral disk space in seven cases and at the lower half of L3 and the upper half of L4 in one case each. On the other hand, in six patients the right renal artery was at the upper half of L1, and one patient each had it at the T12–L1 disk space, the lower half of L1, and the L1–L2 disk space. In the case of conus medullaris, there were three cases each at the T12–L1 disk space and the upper half of L1, two cases at the lower half of L1, and one case at the L1–L2 disk space.

In short, paraspinal structures in the lumbarization of S1 were located more toward the caudal direction compared with cases without lumbosacral anomalies (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D). The paraspinal structures in the sacralization of L5 were located more toward the cephalad direction (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D).



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 24-year-old woman with transitional vertebra (lumbarization of S1). Note that paraspinal structures are located more caudad than is normal. Cervicothoracic sagittal scout MR image shows oil capsule (arrow) at upper border of L1 vertebra (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 24-year-old woman with transitional vertebra (lumbarization of S1). Note that paraspinal structures are located more caudad than is normal. Sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo image shows right renal artery (arrow) at lower half of L2 vertebra.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. 24-year-old woman with transitional vertebra (lumbarization of S1). Note that paraspinal structures are located more caudad than is normal. Sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo image reveals tip of conus medullaris (arrow) at lower half of L2 vertebra.

 


View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D. 24-year-old woman with transitional vertebra (lumbarization of S1). Note that paraspinal structures are located more caudad than is normal. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo image shows aortic bifurcation (arrow) at level of L4–L5 intervertebral disk space.

 


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 49-year-old woman with transitional vertebra (sacralization of L5). Note that paraspinal structures are positioned more cephalad than is normal. Also note spondylolisthesis of L4 onto L5 vertebrae. In cervicothoracic sagittal scout MR image, oil capsule (arrow) is shown between T10 and T11 vertebra.

 


View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 49-year-old woman with transitional vertebra (sacralization of L5). Note that paraspinal structures are positioned more cephalad than is normal. Also note spondylolisthesis of L4 onto L5 vertebrae. Sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo image shows right renal artery (arrow) at upper half of L1 vertebra.

 


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. 49-year-old woman with transitional vertebra (sacralization of L5). Note that paraspinal structures are positioned more cephalad than is normal. Also note spondylolisthesis of L4 onto L5 vertebrae. Sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo image reveals tip of conus medullaris (arrow) at lower half of T12 vertebra.

 


View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D. 49-year-old woman with transitional vertebra (sacralization of L5). Note that paraspinal structures are positioned more cephalad than is normal. Also note spondylolisthesis of L4 onto L5 vertebrae. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo image shows aortic bifurcation (arrow) at level of L3–L4 intervertebral disk space.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In general, localization of the vertebral segment in the lumbar spine MRI is determined by examining the vertebral body configuration of L5 and S1 or by referring to chest and lumbosacral spine radiographs. When such methods are accompanied by cervical rib, hypoplasia of the 12th rib, and transitional vertebra, uncertain information can be given in the localization of the vertebral segment.

Peh et al. [15] used cervicothoracic sagittal imaging for numbering the vertebral segments and reported that the transitional vertebra was in 13.2% of the patients. We also used the cervicothoracic sagittal image for the objective determination of lumbar vertebral segments. On the basis of this gold standard, we examined the location and distribution of the three paraspinal structures: aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris. Confluences of the inferior vena cava, the superior mesenteric artery, and the psoas muscle were also examined on MRI, but the confluences were excluded from this study because it was difficult to determine starting and splitting points accurately. In addition, the pedicle, neural foramen, and iliolumbar ligament were not included in our study.

According to Gray's Anatomy [16], the point of aortic bifurcation is located at the front of the body of L4. On the other hand, Chithriki et al. [6] found that 67% of all cases in MRI research indicated that aortic bifurcation occurred at the L4 vertebral body. The lower level of L4 was prominent in the CT research of Kornreich et al. [7]. In our study, the point of aortic bifurcation was at the anterior part of the L4 vertebral body in 83% of our patients. In particular, 45% were at the upper half of L4 and 38% at the lower half of L4. On the axial images, the first bifurcated common iliac arteries appeared in the L4–L5 disk space in approximately 93%, in the L5–S1 disk space in 5%, and in the L3–L4 disk space in 2%. In the absence of specific information on the location of the lesion on abdominal sonography, abdominal or pelvic CT, and lumbar spine CT, the point of aortic bifurcation can contribute to forecasting the location of the lesion.

Generally, the ostia of the right renal artery lies between the levels of the lower third of the L1 vertebra and the upper third of the L2 vertebral bodies and slightly below the level of the superior mesenteric artery [10, 17, 18]. It can be determined by cadaveric, angiographic, and helical CT studies. However, finding studies that have examined the origin of the renal artery using MRI is difficult. This study examined changes in the location of the proximal portion of the right renal artery that appears as a small round signal void on MRI, especially on sagittal images. The right renal artery was used because observing it in the sagittal area was much easier because the right renal artery is longer than the left renal artery. Likewise, the left renal artery arises from the posterolateral part of the aorta, whereas the right renal artery arises from the anterolateral part of the aorta [10]. In this study, we found that the proximal portions of the right renal artery were distributed as follows: approximately 52% at the L1–L2 intervertebral disk space, 32% at the lower half of the L1 vertebral body, and 8% at the upper half of the L2 vertebral body. In short, 92% of the origin of the right renal artery was located between the lower half of L1 and the upper half of L2 focusing on the L1–L2 disk space, thus helping determine the location of the lumbar vertebral segment.

To our knowledge, the first cadaveric study that described the position of the adult conus medullaris was the work of Thomson [19]. In other cadaveric studies, conus medullaris was reportedly distributed from the T12 to L3 vertebrae; on average, it was located between the L1 and L2 vertebrae [20, 21]. Saifuddin et al. [11] studied the location of the conus medullaris using MRI. These researchers found that the mean position of the conus was the lower third of L1, the range of which was from the middle third of T12 to the upper third of L3, and that the variation in the positions of conus followed normal distribution. In this study, the mean position of the conus medullaris was the lower half of L1. Similar to the results of other studies, its range was from the T12–L1 intervertebral disk space to the upper half of L2 vertebra. In comparison with the aortic bifurcation and the right renal artery, however, the conus medullaris showed a wide distribution. Thus, it was inadequate as a paraspinal structure for determining the location of the lumbar vertebral segment. This inadequacy is caused by the aortic bifurcation and the right renal artery being distributed mostly at two levels, whereas the conus medullaris is evenly distributed across four levels.

The results of our study show that the aortic bifurcation and the right renal artery have a more significant positive correlation than the relationship between the aortic bifurcation and the conus medullaris. Thus, the origin of the right renal artery (i.e., a vascular structure) tends to move in the same direction as the point of aortic bifurcation.

Generally, the lumbosacral junction is the most common site for transitional vertebrae to occur. Here, the lowest lumbar vertebra may have some or all the anatomic characteristics of the first sacral segment (sacralization). Conversely, the first sacral segment may have the radiographic appearance of a lumbar vertebra (lumbarization) [2, 3, 14]. Despite the small number of cases, in the 20 cases of transitional vertebra, 11 cases showed that paraspinal structures of S1 lumbarization were positioned more toward the caudal location, whereas nine cases showed that the paraspinal structures of L5 sacralization were positioned more toward the cephalad location. These findings are similar to the results of Chithriki et al. [6] regarding aortic bifurcation. When the cervicothoracic sagittal scout image is not used and the vertebral segment is counted using a morphology standard, the lumbarization of S1 can be questioned if the paraspinal structures are located at a higher place than the normal range; such will be the case for the sacralization of L5 if they are located at a lower place. However, because not enough cases of transitional vertebrae are available, further studies need to be carried out on the location of paraspinal structures in the transitional vertebrae.

In conclusion, the aortic bifurcation, the right renal artery, and the combination of these structures can be a reliable marker when locating lumbar vertebral segments on MRI. However, the conus medullaris cannot be considered a good landmark because of its variable location. In most patients, the bifurcated common iliac arteries are seen at the L4–L5 disk space, and the proximal right renal artery around the L1–L2 disk space. In our preliminary study, when these paraspinal structures were in outlying positions from the main locations, transitional vertebrae were possible. Their clinical applications include the accurate localization of the lumbosacral disk disease before surgery, the evaluation of transitional vertebra, and the localization of lumbar vertebral segments in an axial CT study.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Hahn PY, Strobel JJ, Hahn FJ. Verification of lumbosacral segments on MR images: identification of transitional vertebrae. Radiology1992; 182:580 –581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DPK. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine 1984;9:493 –495[Medline]
  3. Elster AD. Bertolotti's syndrome revisited: transitional vertebrae of the lumbar spine. Spine1989; 14:1373 –1377[Medline]
  4. MacGibbon B, Farfan HF. A radiologic survey of various configurations of the lumbar spine. Spine1979; 4:258 –266[Medline]
  5. Hinck VC, Clark WM, Hopkins CE. Normal interpediculate distances (minimum and maximum) in children and adults. AJR1966; 97:141 –153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chithriki M, Jaibaji M, Steele RD, et al. The anatomical relationship of the aortic bifurcation to the lumbar vertebrae: a MRI study. Surg Radiol Anat2002; 24:308 –312[Medline]
  7. Kornreich L, Hadar H, Sulkes J, et al. Effect of normal aging on the sites of aortic bifurcation and inferior vena cava confluence: a CT study. Surg Radiol Anat1998; 20:63 –68[Medline]
  8. Lerona PT, Tewfik HH. Bifurcation level of the aorta: landmark for pelvic irradiation. Radiology1975; 115:735[Abstract]
  9. Beregi JP, Mauroy B, Willoteaux S, et al. Anatomic variation in the origin of the main renal arteries: spiral CTA evaluation. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1330 –1334[Medline]
  10. Verschuyl EV, Kaatee R, Beek FJA, et al. Renal artery origins: location and distribution in the transverse plane at CT. Radiology1997; 203:71 –75[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Saifuddin A, Burnett SJD, White J. The variation of position of the conus medullaris in an adult population. Spine1998; 23:1452 –1456[Medline]
  12. Macdonald A, Chatrath P, Spector T. Level of termination of the spinal cord and the dural sac: a magnetic resonance study. Clin Anat 1999;12:149 –152[Medline]
  13. Hartford JM, McCullen GM, Harris R, et al. The iliolumbar ligament: three-dimensional volume imaging and computer reformatting by magnetic resonance. Spine2000; 25:1098 –1103[Medline]
  14. Tini PG, Wieser C, Zinn WM. The transitional vertebra of the lumbosacral spine: its radiological classification, incidence, prevalence, and clinical significance. Rheum Rehab1977; 16:180 –185
  15. Peh WCG, Siu TH, Chan JHM. Determining the lumbar vertebral segments on magnetic resonance imaging. Spine1999; 24:1852 –1855[Medline]
  16. Williams PL, Warwick R. Gray's anatomy, 36th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1980:710 –711
  17. Aubert J, Koumare K. Variations of the origin of the renal artery: a review covering 403 aortographies. Eur Urol1975; 1:182 –188[Medline]
  18. Hollinshead WH. Renovascular anatomy. Postgrad Med 1966;40:241 –246
  19. Thomson A. Fifth annual report of the Committee of Collective Investigation of the Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland for the year 1893-94. J Anat Physiol1894; 29:35 –60[Medline]
  20. Needles JH. The caudal level of termination of the spinal cord in American whites and American Negroes. Anat Rec1935; 63:417 –424
  21. Reimann AF, Anson BJ. Vertebral level of termination of the spinal cord with report of a case of a sacral cord. Anat Rec1944; 88:127 –138

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Saifuddin and R. J. Hughes
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): W211 - W211.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Hughes and A. Saifuddin
Numbering of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on MRI: role of the iliolumbar ligaments.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W59 - W65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS