AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by García-Vila, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Díaz-Ramón, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by García-Vila, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Díaz-Ramón, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 182:1451-1458
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Balloon Sphincteroplasty and Transpapillary Elimination of Bile Duct Stones: 10 Years' Experience

José H. García-Vila1, Marta Redondo-Ibáñez and Carlos Díaz-Ramón

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Hospital General de Castelló, Avda. Benicasim, s/n. Castelló 12004, Spain.

Received October 9, 2003; accepted after revision December 1, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to J. H. García-Vila.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The usual way for interventional radiology to treat stones in the bile duct involves their extraction with Dormia baskets. The technique of dilating the sphincter with a balloon and the transpapillary elimination of the stones has only sporadically been reported in the literature. In this article, we describe our experience with this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between 1992 and 2001, we used this technique on 100 patients between the ages of 17 and 93 years (mean age, 68 years). The minimum diameter of the stones varied between 4 and 22 mm (mean size, 11 mm), and in 46 patients, only a single stone was seen. The stones were located in the common bile duct, and in 11 patients, intrahepatic stones were also observed. The approach was performed through a percutaneous biliary drainage tract in 48 patients, following the surgical tract of the Kehr tube in 36 patients, through a surgical transcystic drainage catheter in 10 patients, and through a percutaneous cholecystostomy in six patients.

RESULTS. The procedure was successful in 95% of the patients. The morbidity rate was 5%, and the procedure did not produce mortality in any of the cases. Eighty-nine patients required one session, 10 patients required two sessions, and the remaining patient required five sessions. The mean period of hospitalization after the procedure was 5.5 days (range, 1–40 days).

CONCLUSION. Balloon sphincteroplasty and transpapillary elimination of bile duct stones is an effective and safe technique.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The disease associated with bile duct stones is relatively frequent and is usually due to their migration from the gallbladder to the bile duct (secondary calculi). According to the literature, between 7% and 20% of patients who have cholecystolithiasis also have stones in the bile duct [1]. This incidence increases significantly with age from the sixth decade of life onwards. The sphincter of Oddi makes the passage of the stones into the duodenum difficult and can result in grave complications such as cholangitis, jaundice, or pancreatitis. Nevertheless, the presence of stones in the bile duct can remain unnoticed and may not provoke any symptoms for many years [1].

The treatment of most secondary calculi in the common bile duct consists of their surgical elimination at the time of cholecystectomy. Despite the fact that the use of intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy have contributed considerably to improving their detection, the incidence of residual stones after surgery in the best series varies between 1.5% and 11% [14]. Since the 1970s, other techniques have become available that permit the nonsurgical treatment of biliary lithiasis. In regard to endoscopic therapy, the current method is sphincterotomy followed by the extraction of stones. Endoscopic extraction of the stones is accomplished with Dormia baskets, with a balloon, or by their spontaneous passage into the duodenum [46]. In regard to interventional radiology, the extraction of the stones is performed with Dormia baskets along the Kehr tube tract. This technique was made popular by Burhenne [7].

Nevertheless, another technique exists that, in our opinion, has not received the attention that it deserves in the field of interventional radiology and that offers unquestionable advantages. The aim of this study is to describe the usefulness of the dilation balloon sphincteroplasty and transpapillary elimination of calculi technique.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
In the period from February 1992 to October 2001, we treated 100 patients using the dilation balloon sphincteroplasty technique, 56 women and 44 men between 17 and 93 years old (mean age, 68 years). Forty-eight patients presented with a clinical condition of biliary obstruction, and all underwent transhepatic biliary drainage under sonographic guidance, in most cases through the left hepatic lobule. Thirty-six of these 48 patients had previously undergone cholecystectomy months or years before. Forty-six patients had recently undergone a cholecystectomy and still carried a surgical bile drainage catheter. Finally, six patients presented directly with acute cholecystitis and no prior history, and given the elevated surgical risk, they underwent a percutaneous cholecystostomy.

Our approach was transhepatic in the 48 patients who had previously received a percutaneous biliary drainage catheter (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D and 2A, 2B, 2C). In the patients who had a surgical biliary drainage catheter, the pathway in 36 patients was along the Kehr tube tract placed during open surgery and in 10 patients through transcystic catheters placed at laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D). In the six remaining patients, the same approach as that used in the percutaneous cholecystostomy was adopted (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D).



View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 83-year-old man who presented with sepsis and obstructive jaundice 12 years after undergoing cholecystectomy. Cholangiogram of percutaneous biliary drainage shows, along with lack of dilatation of intrahepatic ducts, multiple stones in left hepatic and common bile duct.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 83-year-old man who presented with sepsis and obstructive jaundice 12 years after undergoing cholecystectomy. Cholangiogram obtained 12 days after A shows that sepsis has remitted. Sphincteroplasty was performed with balloon diameter of 16 mm.

 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 83-year-old man who presented with sepsis and obstructive jaundice 12 years after undergoing cholecystectomy. Cholangiogram shows occlusion balloon pushing stones to duodenum.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 83-year-old man who presented with sepsis and obstructive jaundice 12 years after undergoing cholecystectomy. Final cholangiogram, obtained 4 days after C, shows removal of calculi and flow of contrast material into duodenum through contractile sphincter.

 


View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 71-year-old woman at high surgical risk, who underwent cholecystectomy 15 years before and presented with choledocholithiasis. She underwent failed endoscopic approach. Cholangiogram of right percutaneous biliary drainage shows single stone (22 mm in diameter) and mild dilation of intrahepatic bile ducts.

 


View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 71-year-old woman at high surgical risk, who underwent cholecystectomy 15 years before and presented with choledocholithiasis. She underwent failed endoscopic approach. Cholangiogram shows sphincteroplasty with 23-mm balloon. In next step, stone could be successfully pushed to duodenum.

 


View larger version (171K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. 71-year-old woman at high surgical risk, who underwent cholecystectomy 15 years before and presented with choledocholithiasis. She underwent failed endoscopic approach. Cholangiogram obtained 3 days after B shows absence of stones and wide contractile sphincter. Clinical situation of patient was satisfactory.

 


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 67-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and stone extraction by choledochotomy. Cholangiogram obtained 7 days after surgery shows four residual stones and Kehr tube with redundant trajectory about to come out of bile duct. For this reason, we decided to eliminate stones without waiting for further maturation of tract.

 


View larger version (171K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 67-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and stone extraction by choledochotomy. Cholangiogram shows multipurpose catheter and guide before correcting curve described by Kehr tube.

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. 67-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and stone extraction by choledochotomy. Cholangiogram shows that after curve is rectified, introducer is put into position and balloon sphincteroplasty (10 mm in diameter) is performed.

 


View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D. 67-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and stone extraction by choledochotomy. Cholangiogram obtained 4 days after A–C shows complete clearance of calculi.

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 92-year-old woman with acute lithiasic cholecystitis. Because she was high risk for surgery, percutaneous cholecystostomy was performed. Cholangiogram obtained 4 days after percutaneous cholecystostomy shows that multiple large gallstones and multiple choledocholithiasis could be seen.

 


View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 92-year-old woman with acute lithiasic cholecystitis. Because she was high risk for surgery, percutaneous cholecystostomy was performed. Cholangiogram obtained 11 days after A shows sphincteroplasty (14-mm balloon) and elimination of stones into duodenum through cholecystostomy.

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. 92-year-old woman with acute lithiasic cholecystitis. Because she was high risk for surgery, percutaneous cholecystostomy was performed. Cholangiogram obtained 4 days after B shows that mechanical lithotripsy of gallstones was performed, and they were extracted with Dormia baskets and aspiration.

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D. 92-year-old woman with acute lithiasic cholecystitis. Because she was high risk for surgery, percutaneous cholecystostomy was performed. Cholangiogram obtained 7 days after C shows clearance of stones both in bile duct and in gallbladder. Patient's condition was good, and drainage catheter was removed.

 

In every patient, cholangiography showed that there were stones in the common bile duct. Eleven patients also had stones in the intrahepatic bile ducts. In 46 patients, a single stone was seen; in 45 patients, two to four calculi were detected; and in nine patients, the number of calculi was impossible to define. The minimum diameter of the stones varied between 4 and 22 mm (mean, 11 mm).

The elimination of the calculi was performed between 2 and 45 days (mean, 13.5 days) after positioning the biliary drainage catheter, either surgically or percutaneously.

Technique
After monitoring the patient's vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and O2 saturation levels), we applied a local anesthetic (lidocaine), IV analgesic (fentanyl), and sedation (midazolam) in varying doses. Prophylactic IV broad-spectrum antibiotics (ceftriaxone) were administered, and the pancreas was protected with 0.25 mg of somatostatin or 0.1 mg of octreotide. In addition, 1 mg of sphincter of Oddi's relaxant (glucagon) was administered (the dose was repeated as needed).

The procedure began by replacing the drainage catheter with an 0.035-inch Amplatz super-stiff guidewire, with its distal tip in the duodenum and a vascular introducer with its distal tip in the common bile duct. The caliber of the introducer ranged between 8 and 10 French in most cases. Through the introducer, cholangiography with diluted contrast material was performed to show the number, location, and size of the stones, as well as the position of the papilla.

The next step involved dilation of the sphincter of Oddi with an angioplasty balloon (AXM, William Cook Europe) or a valvuloplasty balloon (VBC, William Cook Europe), 4 cm long with a diameter that varied between 6 and 23 mm (mean, 12 mm), depending on the size of the stone. The diameter of the balloon was slightly greater than the smallest diameter of the largest calculus. Once in place across the sphincter, the balloon was inflated until the waist disappeared (a pressure of 4–6 atm being usually reached), using a manometer to regulate the pressure and keeping it inflated during 30–60 sec. Dilation was then repeated.

After the sphincter was dilated, the angioplasty balloon was replaced by an occlusion balloon (POB-Weig, William Cook Europe). The caliber of the occlusion balloon was adjusted to the diameter of the common bile duct. After inflation, the occlusion balloon slides along the guidewire, pushing the stones toward the duodenum through the recently dilated papilla.

When the tract of the surgical bile drainage showed pronounced bends, first of all a hydrophilic angled guidewire of 0.035 inches (Nimble Roadrunner PC, William Cook Europe) was passed through the surgical drainage catheter. Then we replaced the drainage catheter with a multipurpose angled catheter (DAV Cerebral Davis TNB 5 F, William Cook Europe) with the tip in the duodenum. The next step consisted of turning and pulling the catheter to straighten the pathway. Finally, the hydrophilic guidewire was exchanged for an Amplatz super-stiff guidewire, and the multipurpose catheter was exchanged for a vascular introducer with its distal tip in the common bile duct (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D).

The stones could be situated in the intrahepatic tract or proximally at the entrance of the introducer in the cases in which the approach adopted was performed through a surgical drainage catheter or through a percutaneous cholecystostomy. In these cases, spontaneous migration might occur after the sphincteroplasty. If this did not occur, using a multipurpose angled catheter, we directed a second guidewire toward the location to situate the occlusion balloon and drag the stones into the distal common bile duct. Finally they were pushed into the duodenum.

After the stones were eliminated, the introducer was exchanged for a prepapillary safety catheter (usually an 8.3-French Mueller biliary drainage catheter, William Cook Europe or a 12-French vanSonnenberg catheter, Boston Scientific Europe). This safety catheter was kept for external drainage, and the final cholangiography was performed through it 2–4 days later.

Success
We considered that the intervention was successful when the cholangiography performed prior to removing the safety catheter showed that the biliary tree was free of residual stone fragments or debris and flow of contrast material through the papilla and into the duodenum was shown.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The intervention was successful in 95% of patients. However, in five patients, the procedure failed: in one patient, massive hemobilia occurred that required the procedure to be interrupted; in another patient, an intense spasm of the sphincter and distal bile duct occurred; and in three patients, the surgical drainage tracts were so tortuous that they impeded our subsequent manipulations (Fig. 5).



View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. 59-year-old woman referred to our unit 30 days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and removal of stones from common bile duct. Cholangiogram obtained through Ring catheter (William Cook Europe) shows residual calculus and intraabdominal catheter trajectory of 360° curve. This is one of our failures, for we could not rectify trajectory of catheter because it had become stabilized as a result of amount of time that had passed.

 

The morbidity rate was 5%. Four patients had hemobilia and one patient had pancreatitis. Of the four patients with hemobilia, one underwent surgical intervention immediately, another was treated with a blood transfusion (3 U), and the other two required only clinical observation. The surgical patient was treated by transpapillary stone extraction through a duodenotomy, followed by gastroenterostomy. Active hemobilia during surgery was not detected. Clinical iatrogenic pancreatitis was only observed in one patient, requiring the parenteral administration of fluid therapy, analgesics, and somatostatin for 24 hr. There were no mortalities.

The number of sessions required was one in 89 patients, two in 10 patients, and five in one patient with multiple stones and postsurgical stenosis.

The mean hospital stay after the procedure was 5.5 days (varying between 1 and 40 days).

Long-term data were obtained retrospectively from chart review and referring clinicians. Information was obtained for 83 patients. The mean follow-up period for obtaining these data was 55 months, (range, 6 months–9 years). In none of the patients has a subsequent episode of cholangitis or of biliary obstruction been reported.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The most common nonsurgical techniques to eliminate bile duct stones involve extraction with Dormia baskets in the field of interventional radiology and, more frequently, sphincterotomy in the field of therapeutic digestive endoscopy. In recent years, other techniques have been incorporated such as the chemical dissolution of the stones, mechanical lithotripsy, laser lithotripsy, ultrasound lithotripsy, electrohydraulic lithotripsy, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy [410].

The total elimination of calculi is achieved by endoscopic sphincterotomy in 80–90% of cases [6]. The usefulness and the success of this technique are clear because during the first 10 years after it was introduced, more than 50,000 interventions of this type were performed worldwide [6]. The morbidity rate is estimated to be less than 10%, varying in different studies between 2% and 13.5% [5, 6, 11, 12], and is greater in cases in which the bile duct is small [13]. The most serious complications are pancreatitis, hemorrhage, and perforation. The mortality rate is between 0% and 1.7% [5, 6, 11, 12].

In the removal of retained calculi with Dormia baskets through the trajectory of the Kehr tube, Burhenne [7] reported a success rate of 95% among a total of 661 patients. Other authors have reported similar results [14], with no mortality and a morbidity rate of approximately 4% [7, 14, 15].

The percutaneous extraction of stones in the bile duct with Dormia baskets implies using a working channel of similar diameter to that of the calculi that are to be removed or using fragmentation methods that complicate and increase the cost of the procedure. It is also necessary to have sufficient contrast material in the duct to visualize the stones so that they can be trapped. Furthermore, this technique also usually requires multiple sessions when multiple stones exist, and it is recommended that the procedure be delayed at least 4–6 weeks to allow a mature fibrous wall to develop along the tube tract. This facilitates percutaneous catheterization, avoids bleeding which occurs with a friable fresh tract, and prevents false passages [710, 14, 1619].

In 1981 Centola et al. [20] described a case of transpapillary elimination of a stone by previously dilating the sphincter with a 6-mm balloon. In 1981 Mason and Cotton [21] and in 1983 Staritz et al. [22] referred to applying endoscopy to this technique in 12 patients with choledocholithiasis. Since then, a few sporadic cases have been reported in the radiology literature [2325].

The technique we describe here permits us to treat very large stones with working tube diameters that are rarely greater than 4 mm and that eliminate all the stones in a single session (in our series, 55% of the patients had more than one stone, and only in 11% of the patients was more than one session required). Additionally, a long period of maturation of the tract is not necessary when adopting this approach (the mean catheter duration in our patients was 13.5 days).

The principal inconvenience of endoscopic sphincterotomy lies in the fact that it produces the definitive loss of sphincter function in most cases (this can be witnessed by the fact that 65% of the patients have pneumobilia after sphincterotomy) [5, 26], an event that can cause long-term complications. Morbid events, including papillary stenosis, recurrent biliary stones, and cholangitis induced by reflux, have been reported in 4–24% of patients who underwent sphincterotomy and have been followed up for up to 15 years [4, 5, 12, 2628]. The search for a technique that is capable of achieving the same results, but more simply with a lower morbidity rate and maintaining the sphincter function has led to the rediscovery of balloon sphincteroplasty in recent years. Indeed, it is reappearing in the endoscopic literature, and there is now a body of work in the area of digestive endoscopy that proposes this technique as an alternative to the classic sphincterotomy [2932].

Manometric studies have already shown the preservation of sphincter function in patients who undergo endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty [30, 33, 34]. Also, experimental studies have been carried out in rabbits in which days after balloon sphincteroplasty, the recovery of sphincter function has also been shown [35]. In our study, on follow-up cholangiography, all patients had sphincters that contracted, and no patient had pneumobilia.

One of the differences among the studies published on endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty is that the different authors systematically used 8-mm-diameter balloons and used mechanical lithotripsy when the stones were large [2934]. In contrast, the size of the balloon that we used varied according to the transverse diameter of the largest stone, with a mean of 12 mm, and we did not resort to mechanical lithotripsy.

In our series, no cases of cholangitis were detected after the procedure, and only one case of mild pancreatitis was observed, although we do not screen all patients for chemical pancreatitis and only patients with clinical signs and symptoms of pancreatitis are identified. One of the factors that probably contributed to this low morbidity rate is the positioning of a safety catheter for the external biliary drainage. This catheter remains open, and it is later removed after performing a new control cholangiography, although this practice has the additional inconvenience of prolonging the process. In our series, the average stay in the hospital after the procedure was 5.5 days. In contrast, endoscopic sphincterotomy is currently performed as an outpatient procedure. However, it is common practice in Japan and other countries for patients to be hospitalized for many days after endoscopic sphincterotomy (the duration of hospital stays was not provided) [5, 6, 1113, 26, 27, 3034].

Pancreatitis is the most frequent and serious complication of endoscopic sphincterotomy and sphincteroplasty. One factor that could reduce the incidence of pancreatitis in our series is the absence of cannulation of the distal pancreatic duct using a radiologic approach. Another factor that could influence the reduced incidence of complications in our study is the systematic administration of pancreatic enzyme secretion inhibitors, such as octreotide or somatostatin. From the outset of our study, we have administered somatostatin, except during a period between 1995 and 1997 in which 32 patients were treated and to whom octreotide was administered. It seems that as well as inhibiting pancreatic secretion, somatostatin also provokes a relaxation of the sphincter of Oddi [36]. Conversely, it has been reported that octreotide (a synthetic analogue of somatostatin) can provoke spasms of the sphincter [37], spasms that have also been described as a paradoxical response to the administration of somatostatin [38]. Although we could not detect any differences between these two drugs in our hands, we decided to return to the use of somatostatin. During the procedure, we have always administered glucagon to produce a relaxation of the sphincter of Oddi.

In 48% of our patients, our approach was performed through a previously inserted percutaneous bile drainage catheter. This approach is, in most cases, through the left hepatic lobule and is guided by echography, given the indubitable advantages that this offers [39]. Although this is a less direct pathway than the right lobule, it is not usually a hindrance to the subsequent elimination of the calculi.

In the cases of residual lithiasis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a frequent problem that can be encountered is the existence of bends in the postsurgical drainage catheter, either in the Kehr tube (placed in cases of choledochotomy) or in the transcystic drainage catheter (placed in cases in which balloon sphincteroplasty is performed during the laparoscopic intervention). These bends are produced by not pulling the tube sufficiently at the end of the intervention when CO2 used for pneumoperitoneum is removed. These bends could be partially corrected if the percutaneous balloon sphincteroplasty is performed in the first 7 days after surgery. These bends make our approach more difficult and explain the failure in three of our patients.

In conclusion, balloon sphincteroplasty with transpapillary elimination of stones in the bile duct is an effective and safe technique for the treatment of this disease and with unquestionable advantages over the more usual procedures.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Perissat J, Huibregtse K, Keane FBV, Russell RGC, Neoptolemos JP. Management of bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1994;81:799 –810[Medline]
  2. Glenn E. Retained calculi within the biliary ductal system. Ann of Surg1974; 179:528 –539
  3. Phillips EH, Rosenthal RJ, Pearlstein AR, Daykhovsky L, Fallas MJ. Laparoscopic transcystic-duct common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 1994;8:1389 –1394[Medline]
  4. Phillips EH. Controversies in the management of common duct calculi. Surg Clin North Am1994; 74:931 –948[Medline]
  5. Leuschner U. Endoscopic therapy of biliary calculi. Clin Gastroenterol 1986;15:332 –358
  6. Gordon RL, Shapiro HA. Nonoperative management of bile duct stones. Surg Clin North Am1990; 70:1313 –1328[Medline]
  7. Burhenne HJ. Garland lecture: percutaneous extraction of retained biliary tract stones—661 patients. AJR1980; 134:889 –898[Abstract]
  8. vanSonnenberg E, Hofmann AF. Horizons in gallstone therapy: 1988. AJR 1988;150:43 –46[Free Full Text]
  9. Picus D. Intracorporeal biliary lithotripsy. Radiol Clin North Am 1990;28:1241 –1249[Medline]
  10. Lee SH, Burhenne HJ. Clinical experience with biliary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Radiol Clin North Am 1990;28:1265 –1275[Medline]
  11. Martínez Castro R, Moreira Vicente V, Angel Yepes V, et al. Complicaciones quirúrgicas de la esfinterotomía endoscópica. Rev Esp Enferm Dig1991; 79:404 –410[Medline]
  12. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc1991; 37:383 –393[Medline]
  13. Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and non-dilated ducts. Gastroenterology1991; 101:1068 –1075[Medline]
  14. Garrow DG. The removal of retained biliary tract stones: report of 105 cases. Br J Radiol1977; 50:777 –781[Abstract]
  15. Burhenne HJ. Complications of non-operative extraction of retained common duct stones. Am J Surg1976; 131:260 –265[Medline]
  16. Clouse ME, Stokes KR, Lee RGL, Falchuk KR. Bile duct stones: percutaneous transhepatic removal. Radiology1986; 160:525 –529[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Stokes KR, Falchuk KR, Clouse ME. Biliary duct stones: update on 54 cases after percutaneous transhepatic removal. Radiology1989; 170:999 –1001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Park JH, Choi BI, Han MC, Sung KB, Choo IW, Kim CW. Percutaneous removal of residual intrahepatic stones. Radiology1987; 163:619 –623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Harris VJ, Sherman S, Trerotola SO, Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Lehman GA. Complex biliary stones: treatment with a small choledochoscope and laser lithotripsy. Radiology1996; 199:71 –77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Centola CA, Jander HP, Stauffer A, Russinovich NA. Balloon dilatation of the papilla of Vater to allow biliary stone passage. AJR 1981;136:613 –614[Free Full Text]
  21. Mason RR, Cotton PB. Combined duodenoscopic and transhepatic approach to stenosis of the papilla of Vater. Br J Radiol 1981;54:678 –679[Medline]
  22. Staritz M, Ewe K, Meyer KH. Endoscopic papillary dilation for the treatment of common bile duct stones and papillary stenosis. Endoscopy 1983;15:197 –198
  23. Meranze SG, Stein EJ, Burke DR, Hartz WH, McLean GK. Removal of retained common bile duct stones with angiographic occlusion balloons. AJR 1986;146:383 –385[Free Full Text]
  24. Berkman WA, Bishop AF, Palagallo GL, Cashman MD. Transhepatic balloon dilation of the distal common bile duct and ampulla of Vater for removal of calculi. Radiology1988; 167:453 –455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gil S, de la Iglesia P, Verdú JF, de Espana F, Arenas J, Irurzun J. Effectiveness and safety of balloon dilation of the papilla and the use of an occlusion balloon for clearance of bile duct calculi. AJR 2000;174:1455 –1460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Seifert E. Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Endoscopy1988; 20[suppl 1]:232 –235
  27. Prat F, Malak NA, Pelletier G, et al. Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Gastroenterology1996; 110:894 –899[Medline]
  28. Bordas JM, Elizalde I, Llach J, Mondelo F, Bataller R, Teres J. Biliary reflux due to sphincter of Oddi ablation: a new pathogenetic explanation for long-term major biliary symptoms after endoscopic-sphincterotomy. Endoscopy1996; 28:642[Medline]
  29. Mathuna PM, White P, Clarke E, Merriman R, Lennon JR, Crowe J. Endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty (papillary dilation) for bile duct stones: efficacy, safety, and follow-up in 100 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:468 –474[Medline]
  30. Minami A, Nakatsu T, Uchida N, et al. Papillary dilation vs sphincterotomy in endoscopic removal of bile duct stones: a randomized trial with manometric function. Dig Dis Sci1995; 40:2550 –2554[Medline]
  31. Bergman JG, Rauws EA, Fockens P, et al. Randomized trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones. Lancet1997; 349:1124 –1129[Medline]
  32. Komatsu Y, Kawabe T, Toda N, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for the management of common bile duct stones: experience of 226 cases. Endoscopy1998; 30:12 –17[Medline]
  33. Sato H, Kodama T, Takaaki J, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation may preserve sphincter of Oddi function after common bile duct stone management: evaluation from the viewpoint of endoscopic manometry. Gut 1997;41:541 –544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Yasuda I, Tomita E, Enya M, Kato T, Moriwaki H. Can endoscopic papillary balloon dilation really preserve sphincter of Oddi function? Gut 2001;49:686 –691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Laguna Sastre M. Efectos de la dilatación con balón de la papila de Vater: estudio experimental en conejo [doctoral thesis]. Alcalá de Henares, España: Univesidad de Alcalá de Henares, 1998
  36. Lai KH, Lo GH, Cheng JS, et al. Effect of somatostatin on the sphincter of Oddi in patients with acute non-biliary pancreatitis. Gut 2001;49:834 –836
  37. Di Francesco V, Angelini G, Rovo P, Casarini MB, Filippini M, Vaona P. Effect of octreotide on sphincter of Oddi motility in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis: a manometric study. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41:2392 –2396[Medline]
  38. Lai KH. Sphincter of Oddi and acute pancreatitis: a new treatment option. JOP2002; 3:83 –85[Medline]
  39. García Vila JH, Saiz Pachés V, Gil Sanchez S, et al. Abordaje biliar percutáneo dirigido por ultrasonografía. Radiología1993; 35:253 –259

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by García-Vila, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Díaz-Ramón, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by García-Vila, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Díaz-Ramón, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS