AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, H.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, J.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, H.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, J.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 182:1513-1519
© American Roentgen Ray Society


MRI of Gallstones with Different Compositions

Hong-Ming Tsai1, Xi-Zhang Lin2, Chiung-Yu Chen2, Pin-Wen Lin3 and Jui-Che Lin4

1 Department of Radiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan 704, Taiwan.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, 138 Sheng-Li Rd., Tainan 704, Taiwan.
3 Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan 704, Taiwan.
4 Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan.

Received August 18, 2003; accepted after revision December 7, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to C.-Y. Chen (chiungyu{at}mail.ncku.edu.tw).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Gallstones are usually recognized on MRI as filling defects of hypointensity. However, they sometimes may appear as hyperintensities on T1-weighted imaging. This study investigated how gallstones appear on MRI and how their appearance influences the detection of gallstones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Gallstones from 24 patients who had MRI performed before the removal of the gallstones were collected for study. The gallstones were classified either as cholesterol gallstone (n = 4) or as pigment gallstone (n = 20) according to their gross appearance and based on analysis by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. MRI included three sequences: single-shot fast spin-echo T2-weighted imaging, 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging, and in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging. The signal intensity and the detection rate of gallstones on MRI were further correlated with the character of the gallstones.

RESULTS. On T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo images, most of the pigment gallstones (18/20) were hyperintense and all the cholesterol gallstones (4/4) were hypointense. The mean ratio of the signal intensity of gallstone to bile was (± standard deviation) 3.36 ± 1.88 for pigment gallstone and 0.24 ± 0.10 for cholesterol gallstone on the 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence (p < 0.001). Combining the 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo and single-shot fast spin-echo sequences achieved the highest gallstone detection rate (96.4%).

CONCLUSION. Based on the differences of signal intensity of gallstones, the 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging was able to diagnose the composition of gallstones. Adding the 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo imaging to the single-shot fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequence can further improve the detection rate of gallstones.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Gallstones are usually depicted on MRI by the characteristic signal void from the stones contrasted against the high signal from the surrounding bile. This phenomenon may be observed on T2-weighted spin-echo images or T1-weighted images of a patient who has been fasting and has high signal from concentrated bile [1, 2]. Nonetheless, gallstones may show high-signal-intensity areas in their centers on T2-weighted MRI, and this intensity is thought to be caused by water-filled clefts in such gallstones [3, 4]. However, other factors contributing to the hyperintensity of gallstones on MRI are still possible [510]. Moeser et al. [6] first reported a case of hyperintense gallstones on T1-weighted imaging, which was confirmed later by similar findings of other investigators [5, 79]. Based on the result of an in vitro study, Ukaji et al. [10] concluded that metal ions in pigment gallstones caused the hyperintensity of gallstones on T1-weighted MRI. However, no study to date has ever correlated the in vivo MRI appearance of gallstones with their composition and assessed the impact of their MRI appearance on detection. This study was, therefore, aimed to investigate MRI of patients with either cholesterol or pigment gallstones and to assess the influence of variability of MRI on gallstone detection.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Gallstones
From August 2001 to March 2003, patients who had gallstones removed by surgery and who also had MRI performed before surgery were enrolled in this study. In total, 24 patients were enrolled (15 men and nine women) with a mean age of 63.8 years (range, 32–83 years). Stones were found solely in the gallbladder in 12 patients, in the intrahepatic ducts in four patients, and in the common bile duct in two patients. Aside from these stones, six patients had common bile duct stones combined with either gallbladder stones (n = 5) or intrahepatic duct stones (n = 1). The size of gallstones ranged from 2 to 35 mm with a mean diameter (± standard deviation [SD]) of 10.6 ± 7.7 mm.

The gallstones were washed with normal saline and maintained in airtight plastic bottles to avoid transformation of the gallstone structure by drying. The gallstones were classified as cholesterol stones or pigment stones according to their surface and cutting plane as described by the gallstone classification of the Japanese Study Group (1986) [11]. The gallstones were further examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy on a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (FTS-40, Bio-Rad) for wave number 4,000 to 400 cm–1 and a spectral resolution of 8 cm–1. Potassium bromide pellets were used to generate the background spectra. The chemical compositions were then compared to the spectra of calcium bilirubinate, calcium carbonate, and calcium palmitate.

In Vivo Imaging
MRI was performed using a field strength of 1.5 T on an MRI system (Signa CV/i, General Electric Medical Systems) with a phased array torso coil. Two fast spoiled gradient-echo T1-weighted images and a single-shot fast spin-echo T2-weighted image were obtained. For in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo images, the parameters were TR range/TE, 175–185/4.2; slice thickness, 8 mm; gap, 2 mm; and flip angle, 90°. For 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo images, the parameters were TR/TE, 5.9/1.2; slice thickness, 6 mm; 3-mm overlap between each image; and flip angle, 10°. For single-shot fast spin-echo T2 images, the parameters were TR range/TE range, 20,000–25,000/90–100; slice thickness, 8 mm; and gap, 2 mm. The 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo images were acquired with fat saturation, and the in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo images were not. All the sequences used a field of view as adjusted by the patients' respective body sizes and a 256 x 168 matrix. The gallstone images obtained using the different sequences were analyzed for the presence and signal intensity of gallstones.

In Vitro Imaging
The gallstones were placed in a normal saline suspension in individual plastic bottles and embedded in water-immersed custom floral foam as a body phantom for MRI. In vitro MRI used the same sequences and parameters as the set for the in vivo MRI except that the slice thickness was 5 mm and an additional set of in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo images with fat saturation was also obtained.

The gallstones were first pulverized and desiccated before the MRI was performed to analyze the contribution of water content in the signal intensity of gallstones on MRI. The homogeneous gallstone powder was placed individually in the plastic Eppendorf tube and embedded in water-immersed custom floral foam as a body phantom for MRI. The setting used for the MRI was the same as that described for the in vitro study. MRI was repeated after adding normal saline to the desiccated gallstone powder to confirm the influence of water on the signal intensity rather than that of any structural change during the process of desiccation. The appearance and signal intensity of the gallstones were recorded for further analysis.

Measurement of Signal Intensity
Quantitative assessment of the signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted sequences was obtained through operator-defined regions of interest. The gallstone signal intensity was measured and compared with the intensity of the gallbladder bile, resulting in a stone–bile signal intensity ratio for each gallstone. Signal intensity was measured at the bile of the dilated common bile duct in three patients who underwent cholecystectomy earlier. If the intensity of a gallstone's magnetic resonance signal varied throughout its structure, it was measured at its most intense region.

In vitro measurement of signal intensity was similar to the in vivo study except that the signal intensity was measured either at the gallstones and surrounding saline or at the gallstone powder and the water-immersed floral foam phantom.

Statistical Analysis
The value of signal intensity ratio was expressed as mean ± 1 SD. The differences in the signal intensity ratio between the cholesterol and pigment gallstone groups were examined by the Mann-Whitney U test. The detection rates of gallstones on different MRI sequences were compared using the chi-square test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The statistical calculations were computed using SPSS version 8.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for Windows (Microsoft).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
All the black and brown stones (classified by the gallstone classification of the Japanese Study Group [11]) showed broad peaks on FTIR analysis corresponding to calcium bilirubinate in the absorbency region 1,600–1,640 cm–1 and calcium palmitate in the absorbency region 2,900–2,940 cm–1. No discrepancy was found between the results of gallstone classification as determined by the gallstone's gross appearance and by FTIR analysis. In total, 20 patients had pigment gallstones and four patients had cholesterol gallstones.

As shown in Table 1, 90% and 30% of the pigment gallstones were hyperintense on the in vivo T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo (Fig. 1A) and in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo images, respectively, and all the cholesterol gallstones were hypointense on the T1-weighted images (Figs. 2A and 2B). All the gallstones appeared as hypointensities on the T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo images (Figs. 1C and 2C). The in vivo (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C and Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C) and in vitro (Figs. 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G and Figs. 2D, 2E, 2F, 2G) images of gallstones were similar but differed in that more pigment gallstones were hyperintense on the in vitro T1-weighted in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo images.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 In Vivo and In Vitro MRI Appearances of Gallstones

 


View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. In vivo and in vitro MRI of pigment gallstone obtained from 83-year-old man with common bile duct stone. T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo MR image discloses hyperintense gallstone (arrowhead) in distal common bile duct.

 


View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. In vivo and in vitro MRI of cholesterol gallstone retrieved from 32-year-old woman with symptomatic gallbladder stone. Both T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo (A) and in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo (B) MR images disclosed hypointense gallstone surrounded by hyperintense gallbladder bile (arrow).

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. In vivo and in vitro MRI of cholesterol gallstone retrieved from 32-year-old woman with symptomatic gallbladder stone. Both T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo (A) and in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo (B) MR images disclosed hypointense gallstone surrounded by hyperintense gallbladder bile (arrow).

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. In vivo and in vitro MRI of pigment gallstone obtained from 83-year-old man with common bile duct stone. T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo MR image shows gallstone is hypointense and is seen as filling defect surrounded by hyperintense bile (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. In vivo and in vitro MRI of cholesterol gallstone retrieved from 32-year-old woman with symptomatic gallbladder stone. T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo image also shows similar findings (arrow) as seen on T1-weighted images.

 


View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. In vivo and in vitro MRI of pigment gallstone obtained from 83-year-old man with common bile duct stone. T1-weighted in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo MR image obtained at same level as A shows gallstone became isointense (arrowhead) and could not be detected.

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. In vivo and in vitro MRI of pigment gallstone obtained from 83-year-old man with common bile duct stone. In vitro 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo MR image shows gallstone is hyperintense.

 


View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. In vivo and in vitro MRI of pigment gallstone obtained from 83-year-old man with common bile duct stone. In vitro in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo MR images of gallstone acquired with (E) and without (F) fat saturation shows gallstone appeared as hypointense structure with outer margin of hyperintensity.

 


View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F. In vivo and in vitro MRI of pigment gallstone obtained from 83-year-old man with common bile duct stone. In vitro in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo MR images of gallstone acquired with (E) and without (F) fat saturation shows gallstone appeared as hypointense structure with outer margin of hyperintensity.

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1G. In vivo and in vitro MRI of pigment gallstone obtained from 83-year-old man with common bile duct stone. In vitro T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo MR image shows gallstone as hypointense.

 


View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D. In vivo and in vitro MRI of cholesterol gallstone retrieved from 32-year-old woman with symptomatic gallbladder stone. Gallstone appeared as hypointense on in vitro T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo image (D), inphase fast spoiled gradient-echo image with (E) and without (F) fat saturation, and T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo image (G).

 


View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2E. In vivo and in vitro MRI of cholesterol gallstone retrieved from 32-year-old woman with symptomatic gallbladder stone. Gallstone appeared as hypointense on in vitro T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo image (D), inphase fast spoiled gradient-echo image with (E) and without (F) fat saturation, and T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo image (G).

 


View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2F. In vivo and in vitro MRI of cholesterol gallstone retrieved from 32-year-old woman with symptomatic gallbladder stone. Gallstone appeared as hypointense on in vitro T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo image (D), inphase fast spoiled gradient-echo image with (E) and without (F) fat saturation, and T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo image (G).

 


View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2G. In vivo and in vitro MRI of cholesterol gallstone retrieved from 32-year-old woman with symptomatic gallbladder stone. Gallstone appeared as hypointense on in vitro T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo image (D), inphase fast spoiled gradient-echo image with (E) and without (F) fat saturation, and T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo image (G).

 

As listed in Table 2, the contrast of signal intensity between the pigment gallstones and the background was prominent on either the in vivo or the in vitro 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo images and became less prominent on the T1-weighted in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo images with and without fat saturation. The signal intensity of cholesterol gallstones was lower than that of the background on both T1- and T2-weighted MR images. The mean ratios of stone-to-background signal intensities of pigment and cholesterol gallstones were therefore significantly different on the 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo and in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo T1-weighted images but were similar on the T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo images.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Signal Contrast of Gallstones to Gallbladder Bile and Normal Saline for In Vivo and In Vitro MRI

 

Table 3 shows the effect of the water content on gallstone MRI. The desiccated powders of all cholesterol and pigment stones were hypointense on T1-weighted imaging. The intensities of the pigment gallstone powders on T1-weighted images were so greatly enhanced after adding normal saline that the mean intensity of pigment gallstones was 4.36 and 3.86 times greater, respectively, to that of body phantom on 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo and in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo sequences. However, the mean intensity of cholesterol gallstone was only slightly enhanced after the addition of normal saline with a mean signal intensity ratio of stone-to-body phantom of approximately 1 on T1-weighted images. Both the pigment and cholesterol gallstone powders were hypointense on T2-weighted images, and the signal intensities were lower than that of the body phantom, whether before or after the addition of normal saline.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Signal Contrast of Gallstone Powder to Body Phantom With and Without Normal Saline

 

Table 4 shows the results of MRI diagnosis of gallstone using different MRI sequences. The cholesterol gallstones exclusively occurred in the gallbladder in our collections and were visualized as filling defects on all three MRI sequences (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C). The T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo imaging showed pigment gallstone as a filling defect and was good in detecting those gallbladder stones. The T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo imaging presented the pigment gallstones as hyperintense areas and was good in detecting those common bile duct stones (Fig. 1A). The T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo MRI missed a gallbladder stone and the T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo MRI missed two common bile duct stones. Moreover, both the T1- and T2-weighted MRI missed detecting a case of intrahepatic duct stones, which were isointense pigment stones 5 mm in diameter and appearing in a nondilated bile duct. Because more than half the pigment gallstones appeared isointense on T1-weighted in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo images (Table 1), the in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo imaging was not good for the detection of pigment gallstone. Combining the 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo and the single-shot fast spin-echo MRI sequences achieved the highest rate of gallstone detection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4 Detection Rate of Gallstones in Different Locations of the Biliary Tree on MRI

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
MR cholangiography detects bile duct stones as areas of signal void in the high-signal-intensity bile and has been the diagnostic tool of choice for detecting gallstones. However, symptoms relating to bile duct stones may be nonspecific and can be merely bile duct dilatation without fever and abdominal pain [12]. Abdominal MRI may therefore be performed for gallstone patients with atypical symptoms. Because MRI usually includes axial T1- and T2-weighted sequences, the recognition of bile duct stones on these sequences as the cause of symptoms, or as coincidental findings, would be beneficial.

T2-weighted imaging has been considered superior to T1-weighted imaging in detecting bile duct stones because most of the gallstones are isointense on T1-weighted MR images [13]. Although only some gallstones have been reported to be hyperintense on T1-weighted imaging [510], a considerable number of stones have appeared as hyperintensities on our T1-weighted imaging. Gallstones of hyperintensity on T1-weighted images have been found to be related to stones having brown to black cross sections or a salt-and-pepper appearance [6, 10]. These stones, according to the gallstone classification of the Japanese Study Group [11], should be classified as pigment gallstones. As seen in our study, the intensity ratio of gallstone to bile or to normal saline of the T1-weighted imaging was significantly higher for pigment gallstones than for cholesterol gallstones. These findings show that the hyperintense gallstones on T1-weighted images were pigment gallstones and cholesterol gallstones were exclusively hypointense on T1-weighted imaging.

Differentiation of pigment and cholesterol gallstones was once important 10–20 years ago, when gallstone dissolution therapy was popular for patients with gallbladder stones. At that time, diagnosis of the composition of the gallstone was important in predicting the success of gallstone dissolution and in choosing the solvent for gallstone dissolution. The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, however, has changed that. Currently, few patients with gallstones are treated with dissolution therapy. Nevertheless, because of the different consistencies of cholesterol and pigment gallstones, the differentiation of gallstone composition may still have a clinical impact when dealing with endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy for big common bile duct stones. On such an occasion, the big pigment gallstone can be easily crushed by a mechanical lithotripter and retrieved, whereas the presence of big cholesterol gallstones usually implies a difficult-to-treat stone because they are harder than pigment stones and endoscopic lithotripsy may fail.

Ukaji et al. [10] studied the in vitro images of gallstones and considered that the hyperintensity of pigment gallstone on T1-weighted images was caused by the presence of metal ions in the pigment stones. These metal ions behave as paramagnetic ions, shortening the T1 relaxation time of water protons, and as such, stones containing these ions appeared as hyperintense areas on T1-weighted images. The presence of water, therefore, plays a key role in determining the intensity of gallstones on MRI. This theory was further tested and supported by our study, showing that all pigment gallstones became signal void on T1-weighted imaging after desiccation, whereas the hyperintensity of pigment gallstones was restored after adding normal saline.

We found that most of the pigment gallstones were hyperintense on the T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo images, although only one third of them were hyperintense on the T1-weighted in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo images. Because the 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo images were acquired with fat saturation and the in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo images were not, the higher intensity of gallstone on 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo images may be caused by fat saturation itself, which increased the apparent brightness of water-bearing stones. Such inference, however, has been discounted because the in vitro in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo images showed similar image and intensity ratio acquired either with or without fat saturation. The 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo MRI sequence differs from the in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence not only in the thickness of the slice but also in the TE and TR. As seen in the previous ferumoxides experiment, the short TE of 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence may reduce the susceptibility and short transverse relaxation effect of the metal ions and therefore increase the signal of pigment gallstones [14]. The TR of the 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence being shorter than the in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence may contribute to a suppression of the background signal and result in improved visualization of the longitudinal effect of gallstones containing metal ions [14]. Because the 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence is not used for routine MRI diagnosis of gallstone, its application in our study should account for the higher incidence of hyperintense gallstones in our study than in other reports.

MR cholangiography and T2-weighted MRI detect gallstones indirectly by showing them as filling defects. However, several pitfalls are associated with them. First, other types of intraluminal filling defects, such as intraductal tumor, blood clot, or gas bubble (pneumobilia), can mimic gallstones and may be difficult to differentiate [15]. Second, gallstones impacted at the ampulla may be missed on T2-weighted imaging because of the lack of bile surrounding the stone and, hence, no filling defect will appear on the images [15]. These pitfalls can be avoided by using T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo imaging because it reveals pigment gallstones directly as hyperintense areas on images rather than just as filling defects. This characteristic of T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo imaging explains why the 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence is better than the single-shot fast spin-echo sequence for MRI in terms of diagnosing common bile duct stones in our study.

In summary, our study shows the MRI characteristics of cholesterol and pigment gallstones. In addition to recognizing a gallstone as a filling defect on T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo imaging, the cholesterol and pigment gallstones can be readily differentiated because most pigmented stones are bright, whereas cholesterol stones are dark on 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging. The 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging is as good as T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo imaging in diagnosing gallstones and can even be better when applied to bile duct stones. Common bile duct and intrahepatic duct stones are frequently pigment gallstones and are prevalent in many areas of Asia. We recommend a combined use of 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo and single-shot fast spin-echo sequence for routine MRI of gallstones.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Hricak H, Filly RA, Margulis AR, Moon KL, Crooks LE, Kaufman L. Work in progress: nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the gallbladder. Radiology1983; 147:481 –484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. McCarthy S, Hricak H, Cohen M, et al. Cholecystitis: detection with MR imaging. Radiology1986; 158:333 –336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Moon KL Jr, Hricak H, Margulis AR, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of gallstones in vitro. Radiology1983; 148:753 –756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Moriyasu F, Ban N, Nishida O, et al. Central signals of gallstones in magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Gastroenterol1987; 82:139 –142[Medline]
  5. Baron RL, Shuman WP, Lee SP, et al. MR appearance of gallstones in vitro at 1.5 T: correlation with chemical composition. AJR 1989;153:497 –502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Moeser PM, Julian S, Karstaedt N, Strechi M. Unusual presentation of cholelithiasis on T1-weighted MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:150 –152[Medline]
  7. Mathieu D, Guinet C, Cauquil P, Vasile N, Roche A. Intrahepatic calculi: imaging by MR. Radiat Med1988; 6:1 –8[Medline]
  8. Zangger P, Grossholz M, Mentha G, Lemoine R. Graf JD, Terrier F. MRI findings in Caroli's disease and intrahepatic pigmented calculi. Abdom Imaging1995; 20:361 –364[Medline]
  9. Gabata T, Kadoya M, Matsui O, Kobayashi T, Sanada J, Mori A. Intrahepatic biliary calculi: correlation of unusual MR findings with pathologic findings. Abdom Imaging2000; 25:266 –268[Medline]
  10. Ukaji M, Ebara M, Tsuchiya Y, et al. Diagnosis of gallstone composition in magnetic resonance imaging in vitro analysis. Eur J Radiol 2002; 41:49 –56[Medline]
  11. Kitayama O, Ise H, Abe H, et al. Diagnosis of the types of gallstones by DIC [in Japanese]. J Biliary Tract Pancreas 1991;12:1191 –1197
  12. Britton J, Bickerstaff KI, Savage A. Benign diseases of the biliary tract. In: Morris PJ, Malt RA, eds. Oxford textbook of surgery. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press,1994 : 1209–1239
  13. Chan YL, Lam WW, Metreweli C, Chung SC. Detectability and appearance of bile duct calculus on MR imaging of the abdomen using axial T1- and T2-weighted sequences. Clin Radiol1997; 52:351 –355[Medline]
  14. Takahama K, Amano Y, Hayashi H, Kumazaki T. T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequence appropriate for the evaluation of the longitudinal relaxation effect of superparamagnetic iron oxide: a phantom study. J Nippon Med Sch2002; 69:571 –576[Medline]
  15. Baillie J, Paulson EK, Vitellas KM. Biliary imaging: a review. Gastroenterology2003; 124:1686 –1699[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
O. A. Catalano, D. V. Sahani, S. P. Kalva, M. S. Cushing, P. F. Hahn, J. J. Brown, and R. R. Edelman
MR Imaging of the Gallbladder: A Pictorial Essay
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 135 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. C. Chan, B. N. Joe, F. V. Coakley, E. L. Prien Jr, R. G. Gould, S. Prevrhal, W. C. Barber, K. S. Kirkwood, A. Qayyum, and B. M. Yeh
Gallstone Detection at CT in Vitro: Effect of Peak Voltage Setting.
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 546 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. K. Kim, C. S. Kim, J. M. Lee, S. W. Ko, G. H. Chung, S. O. Lee, Y. M. Han, and S. Y. Lee
Value of adding T1-weighted image to MR cholangiopancreatography for detecting intrahepatic biliary stones.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): W267 - W274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, H.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, J.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, H.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, J.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS