AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krinsky, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krinsky, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 183:215-219
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Comparison of Unenhanced CT and Chemical Shift MRI in Evaluating Lipid-Rich Adrenal Adenomas

Gary M. Israel1, Melvyn Korobkin2, Chun Wang1, Elizabeth N. Hecht1 and Glenn A. Krinsky1

1 Department of Radiology, NYU Medical Center, 560 First Ave., Ste. HW 202, New York, NY 10016.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030.

Received October 30, 2003; accepted after revision January 6, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to G. M. Israel (gary.israel{at}med.nyu.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to evaluate adrenal adenomas in patients who underwent both unenhanced CT and chemical shift MRI to determine if adenomas can be characterized with MRI when the findings of CT are indeterminate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between January 1999 and June 2003, 40 patients (42 adrenal masses) underwent unenhanced CT and chemical shift MRI and were retrospectively analyzed. Hounsfield units, adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio, and signal-intensity index were obtained for each adrenal mass. Qualitative analysis for loss of signal in each adrenal mass on the opposed-phase images was also performed by two reviewers and compared with the quantitative analyses. A lipid-rich adenoma was diagnosed if the mass measured equal to or less than 10 H, had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of less than 0.71, and had a signal-intensity index of greater than 16.5% or if the mass fulfilled two of the preceding criteria and had follow-up imaging without change.

RESULTS. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing a lipid-rich adenoma using the qualitative, adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio, signal-intensity index, and unenhanced CT attenuation analyses were 92% (33/36) and 17% (1/6), 100% (36/36) and 100% (6/6), 100% (36/36) and 67% (4/6), and 78% (28/36) and 83% (5/6), respectively. Twenty-eight (67%) lipid-rich adenomas measured equal to or less than 10 H, had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of less than 0.71, and had a signal-intensity index of greater than 16.5%. Eight masses (19%) measured greater than 10 H but had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of less than 0.71 and a signal-intensity index greater than 16.5% and were unchanged at follow-up.

CONCLUSION. Eight (62%) of 13 adrenal adenomas measuring greater than 10 H on unenhanced CT were definitively characterized with chemical shift MRI.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The incidentally discovered adrenal mass, present in up to 5% of abdominal CT scans, has become a common clinical and diagnostic problem [1]. Unenhanced CT and chemical shift MRI have become the mainstays of differentiating lipid-rich adrenal adenomas, which contain large amounts of intracytoplasmic lipid, from other adrenal masses that do not contain sufficient quantities of intracytoplasmic lipid to be diagnosed as adrenal adenomas [24]. However, to our knowledge, a direct comparison of adrenal mass characterization using unenhanced CT and chemical shift MRI on the same cohort of patients has been performed in only two other studies [5, 6]. Therefore, it is uncertain if there is always a direct correlation of both imaging techniques when characterizing adrenal masses and, specifically, when characterizing lipid-rich adrenal adenomas. Our purpose was to further evaluate adrenal adenomas in patients who underwent both unenhanced CT and chemical shift MRI to determine if there are cases of lipid-rich adrenal adenomas that can be characterized using one imaging technique and not the other.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This retrospective study and a waiver of patient consent were approved by the institutional review board. Our search of a radiology database records at New York University Medical Center from January 1999 through June 2003 yielded 874 CT reports in which the word "adenoma" was present. This group of patients was cross-referenced with an IDXrad radiology information system (IDX Systems) to determine which patients had undergone unenhanced CT and chemical shift MRI that included the adrenal glands. This search yielded 41 patients with 43 adrenal masses. One patient with a 4-mm adrenal mass on CT was excluded because the mass could not be confidently identified on MRI. Our final study cohort included 40 patients (25 men and 15 women; average age, 73 years; age range, 46–89 years) with 42 adrenal masses. Of the 42 masses, 23 measured less than 1.5 cm, with a mean mass size of 1.1 cm (range, 0.8–1.4 cm). Overall, the mean mass size was 1.6 cm (range, 0.8–3.3 cm). The mean interval between the CT and MRI was 1 year 3 months (range, 1 month–7 years 1 month).

The CT scans and MR images were reloaded onto a PACS (picture archiving and communication system). For CT, one author manually defined a circular or oval region-of-interest (ROI) measurement in the center of the adrenal mass to obtain Hounsfield unit measurements. For the MR images, signal-intensity measurements were obtained using a manually defined ROI placed in the center of the adrenal mass and spleen on both in-phase and opposed-phase images. In one patient (one adrenal mass) who had undergone splenectomy, the left kidney was used for signal-intensity measurement instead of the spleen. For the adrenal masses, the largest ROI was placed that did not include partial volume effects from the adjacent fat or from the India ink artifact present on opposed-phase MR images. For the splenic ROI measurements, large blood vessels were avoided. An adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio and a signal-intensity index were calculated. The adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio was defined as the adrenal mass–to-spleen signal-intensity ratio on the opposed-phase images divided by the adrenal mass–to-spleen signal-intensity ratio on the in-phase images. The signal-intensity index was defined as the adrenal mass signal intensity on the in-phase images minus the adrenal mass signal intensity on the opposed-phase images divided by the adrenal mass signal intensity on the in-phase images multiplied by 100%.

Two independent radiologists (with 2 and 10 years' experience in interpreting abdominal MR images) who were blinded to the quantitative data reviewed the in- and opposed-phase images for the presence or absence of qualitative signal loss in the adrenal mass using the spleen (kidney, n = 1) as a reference. Any discrepancy between the two radiologists was settled by consensus. A comparison of the quantitative and qualitative results was performed.

All CT examinations were performed on helical scanners (HiSpeed Advantage [n = 15] or CTi [n = 16], General Electric Medical Systems; Volume-Zoom [n = 9], Siemens Medical Solutions). The slice collimation varied (10 mm, n = 1; 7 mm, n = 15; 5 mm, n = 21; 3 mm, n = 1; and 1.25 mm, n = 2). For the 23 masses that measured less than 1.5 cm, the mean slice collimation was 5.6 mm.

All MRI examinations were performed on a 1.5-T system (Vision or Symphony, Siemens Medical Solutions) using a torso phased array coil. All patients underwent axial breath-hold dual-echo T1-weighted imaging (in-phase and opposed-phase) using a 2D gradient-refocused echo sequence. The TR range was 152–200 and the TE ranges were 2.1–2.7 (opposed-phase) and 4.8–5.3 (in-phase). Other imaging parameters were as follows: matrix, 128 x 256; slice thickness, 4–8 mm; interslice gap, 0.6–2 mm; and rectangular field of view, 200–263 x 320–375 mm.

The final diagnosis of each mass was based on the available radiologic and pathologic data. The diagnosis of a lipid-rich adenoma was made if the mass measured equal to or less than 10 H on unenhanced CT [7], had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of less than 0.71 on MRI [5], and had a signal-intensity index of greater than 16.5% [8] or if the mass fulfilled two of the three preceding criteria and had greater than 6-month imaging follow-up without any interval change. If a mass did not meet the criteria of a lipid-rich adenoma but had imaging follow-up of 1 year or more without change, it was considered benign.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The final clinical diagnoses in the 42 adrenal masses were the following: lipid-rich adenoma (n = 36), pheochromocytoma (n = 1), and other benign adrenal mass (n = 5). The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing a lipid-rich adenoma using the qualitative, adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio, signal-intensity index, and unenhanced CT attenuation analyses were 92% (33/36) and 17% (1/6), 100% (36/36) and 100% (6/6), 100% (36/36) and 67% (4/6), and 78% (28/36) and 83% (5/6), respectively.

Quantitative Analysis
Of the 42 adrenal masses, 28 (67%) measured less than or equal to 10 H on unenhanced CT, had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of less than 0.71, and a signal-intensity index of greater than 16.5% (Figs. 1 and 2), consistent with lipid-rich adrenal adenomas. The mean CT attenuation was –1.0 H (range, –23.1 to 10 H), the mean adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio was 0.47 (range, 0.18–0.70), and the mean signal-intensity index was 56.6% (range, 26–83%).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Graph shows correlation of unenhanced CT attenuation and adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio. Dotted lines denote threshold values.

 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Graph shows correlation of unenhanced CT attenuation and signal-intensity index. Dotted lines denote threshold values.

 

Eight masses (19%) measured greater than 10 H on unenhanced CT but had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of less than 0.71 and a signal-intensity index of greater than 16.5% (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C). The mean unenhanced CT attenuation, adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio, and signal-intensity index were the following: 19 H (range, 14.1–26 H), 0.50 (range, 0.32–0.67), and 49% (range, 28–68%), respectively. The mean follow-up time for these masses was 2.6 years (range, 6 months–5 years). No change in size was seen in of any of these masses, and they were consistent with lipid-rich adrenal adenomas.



View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 84-year-old man with adrenal adenoma that was characterized using chemical shift MRI but not with unenhanced CT. Unenhanced axial CT image shows 1.5-cm left adrenal mass (arrow), which measures 20 H.

 


View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 84-year-old man with adrenal adenoma that was characterized using chemical shift MRI but not with unenhanced CT. Axial in-phase MR image shows that adrenal mass is slightly hyperintense with respect to spleen.

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. 84-year-old man with adrenal adenoma that was characterized using chemical shift MRI but not with unenhanced CT. Axial opposed-phase MR image shows that mass is isointense–hypointense with respect to spleen. For this lesion, adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio and signal-intensity index were 0.32 and 68%, respectively. Qualitative analysis identified signal loss on opposed-phase image. This mass has been stable for 5 years and is consistent with lipid-rich adrenal adenoma.

 

Two masses (5%) measured greater than 10 H on unenhanced CT and had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of greater than or equal to 0.71 but had a signal-intensity index of greater than 16.5%. The mean unenhanced CT attenuation, adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio, and signal-intensity index were 18.8 H (range, 16.7–20.9 H), 0.75 (range, 0.73–0.76), and 33.5% (range, 27–40%), respectively. These masses were unchanged in size with a mean follow-up time of 1.9 years (range, 1.4–2.4 years) and were considered benign.

Three masses (7%) measured greater than 10 H on unenhanced CT, had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of greater than or equal to 0.71, and had a signal-intensity index of less than 16.5%. The mean CT attenuation, adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio, and signal-intensity index were 33.6 H (range, 21.1–40.0 H), 1.0 (range, 0.84–1.1), and 7.1% (range, 1–16.2%), respectively. One of these masses measured 39.7 H on unenhanced CT, had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of 1.07 and a signal-intensity index of 4%, and was found to be a pheochromocytoma at surgery. The two remaining masses were unchanged in size with a mean follow-up time of 2.6 years (range, 2–3.2 years) and were considered benign.

A single mass (2%) measured –8 H on unenhanced CT but had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of 1.01 and a signal-intensity index of 0%. This mass was unchanged at 1-year follow-up and was considered benign.

Overall, chemical shift MRI characterized eight (62%) of 13 adrenal masses that measured greater than 10 H on unenhanced CT as lipid-rich adrenal adenomas.

Qualitative Analysis
The qualitative analysis was concordant with all three quantitative evaluations in 27 (64%) of 42 adrenal masses, whereas in 15 masses (36%), it was discordant with at least one of the quantitative evaluations (Table 1). In two (13%) of these 15 masses (masses 1 and 2 on Table 1), all three quantitative parameters characterized a lipid-rich adenoma, but the qualitative analysis did not identify visual signal loss. In two (13%) of 15 masses (masses 3 and 4) in which qualitative signal loss was identified, a lipid-rich adenoma was not diagnosed by any of the three quantitative measures. In eight (53%) of 15 masses (masses 5–12), the adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio and signal-intensity index characterized a lipid-rich adenoma, but all these masses measured greater than 10 H on unenhanced CT. In one of these cases (mass 5), the qualitative analysis did not identify signal loss, whereas in the remaining seven cases (masses 6–12), qualitative signal loss was identified. These eight masses were stable at follow-up (mean, 2.5 years; range, 6 months–5 years) and were consistent with lipid-rich adenomas. In three of 15 masses (masses 13–15), qualitative analysis identified signal loss; however, only one of the quantitative analyses (signal-intensity index [n = 2] and unenhanced CT [n = 1]) met the criteria of a lipid-rich adenoma. These three masses were stable at follow-up (mean, 1.6 years; range, 1–2.4 years).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Fifteen Adrenal Masses with Discrepant Findings Between Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Lipid-rich adrenal adenomas contain intracytoplasmic lipid, which accounts for their low attenuation on unenhanced CT and their loss of signal on opposed-phase chemical shift MRI. Although both unenhanced CT and chemical shift MRI are useful in characterizing lipid-rich adrenal adenomas, a comparison of these techniques on the same cohort of patients has only rarely been published [5, 6]. Whether a direct relationship exists between unenhanced CT and chemical shift MRI when characterizing lipid-rich adrenal adenomas is therefore uncertain.

This study shows that eight (62%) of 13 lipid-rich adenomas could be characterized using chemical shift MRI when unenhanced CT values were greater than 10 H. Outwater et al. [5] performed a similar study using the same adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio, which showed a high correlation between the unenhanced CT attenuation of adrenal masses and the adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio. Similar to our results, their study also uncovered three benign adrenal masses (presumed lipid-rich adenomas) that measured greater than 10 H on unenhanced CT and had adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratios of less than 0.71, supporting the notion that chemical shift MRI is more sensitive for the diagnosis of a lipid-rich adrenal adenoma. However, a single malignant lesion in their study with an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of 0.70 was misclassified as benign.

A similar study by McNicholas et al. [6] also compared unenhanced CT and chemical shift MRI in evaluating adrenal masses. They used the same adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio and threshold on MRI as those used in this study but used a lower threshold (0 H) to diagnose a benign mass on unenhanced CT. They showed that chemical shift MRI could characterize four of five adrenal masses with indeterminate CT attenuation (between 1 and 20 H) as benign. However, those four lesions measured 10 H or less on unenhanced CT. The fifth lesion measured between 10 and 20 H but had an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio greater than 0.7. More important, using an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio threshold of 0.70 in their study, they correctly identified all malignant lesions.

The optimal threshold to use in diagnosing a lipid-rich adrenal adenoma with chemical shift MRI has yet to be determined. In this study, we used an adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio of less than 0.71 to indicate a lipid-rich adenoma, similar to that used in previous studies [5, 6]. In a study by Mayo-Smith et al. [9], a similar adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio was obtained but a slightly higher threshold of 0.75 was used and all metastases were correctly classified, although five of 28 adenomas were misclassified. In their study, the adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio was compared with the signal-intensity index (using 5% as the threshold), and it was determined that the adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio was a better quantitative test for discriminating adenomas from metastases. Conversely, Fujiyoshi et al. [8] analyzed four different methods of quantitatively evaluating adrenal adenomas and concluded that the signal-intensity index was the most effective method to distinguish adenomas from metastases. However, the thresholds used to make this distinction were not clearly defined in the study.

In general radiology practice, it is common to qualitatively characterize adrenal masses without obtaining signal-intensity measurements. Mayo-Smith et al. [9] compared a qualitative assessment of adrenal masses with the adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratio and found no significant difference in lesion characterization. However in our study, the qualitative and quantitative assessments differed in 15 (36%) of 42 adrenal masses. Although the technique used in the study by Mayo-Smith et al. (which used a 5-point scale of certainty) was slightly different from that used in our study, the reason for the discrepancy is unclear. Nevertheless, the results of this study suggest that qualitative analysis may be less sensitive than quantitative analysis when characterizing adrenal masses on MRI, and it may therefore be prudent to obtain quantitative measurements.

Our study design did not include malignant lesions. In a patient who has a primary neoplasm and an adrenal mass, the proper characterization of the adrenal mass is critical. The diagnosis of an adenoma should be made with very high specificity to avoid misclassification of a metastasis as a benign lesion and should result in fewer adrenal biopsies. Unenhanced CT has been shown to be useful in differentiating lipid-rich adrenal adenomas from other adrenal masses because lipid-rich adenomas have lower CT attenuation values [7]. However, lipid-poor adenomas cannot be differentiated from metastases on unenhanced CT, and in these cases, the identification of negative pixels in the adrenal mass during the portal venous phase of enhancement or delayed CT enhancement washout calculations has proven helpful [1012]. Although an adrenal washout study is noninvasive, it has risks. When appropriate screening methods are used, iodinated IV contrast material is safe but is still potentially toxic. Furthermore, an adrenal washout study requires additional radiation exposure.

MRI has been shown to be useful and is widely accepted in differentiating lipid-rich adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas [4]. In this study, eight (62%) of 13 indeterminate adrenal masses on unenhanced CT (> 10 H) were characterized as lipid-rich adenomas using adrenal-to-spleen chemical shift ratios and signal-intensity indexes. This outcome has important implications in the algorithm for evaluating an adrenal mass in a patient with cancer. If an adrenal mass is incidentally found on unenhanced CT and does not meet the criteria of an adenoma (≤ 10 H), chemical shift MRI could be performed next for possible characterization, before performing a CT adrenal washout study. The upper limit of unenhanced CT attenuation of an adrenal mass in which chemical shift MRI is capable of characterizing a lipid-rich adenoma is not known. However, in this study, a lipid-rich adrenal adenoma on MRI measured as high as 26 H on unenhanced CT.

This study has limitations, including its retrospective nature and a case-selection bias for adrenal adenomas. Also, the imaging protocols were not standardized across all cases. This discrepancy may account for some differences between the two techniques. Also, in some cases, the TE was as high as 5.3; therefore, these images may not have been acquired optimally inphase. In addition, some adrenal masses in this series were small (8 mm), and characterizing these masses can be problematic because of partial volume artifacts. This problem is found especially with opposed-phase chemical shift imaging, in which it may be difficult to differentiate loss of signal in the lesion from the India ink artifact surrounding the lesion. In addition, one 4-mm adrenal mass seen on CT was excluded from the cohort because it could not be identified on MRI. Perhaps CT may be a better technique to use when characterizing very small adrenal masses.

Next, in some cases, the interval between CT and MRI was as great as 7 years, and the nature of the lesion could change during the interval. Also, because malignant lesions were not included in this study, it is not possible to determine if an adrenal malignancy could be mistakenly diagnosed as a benign lesion.

Finally, pathologic proof was available for only a single lesion. However, the remaining lesions were characterized using clinically accepted and widely used CT and MRI techniques combined with imaging follow-up. The appropriate length of follow-up to determine that an adrenal mass is benign is not known. In some cases in this series, follow-up imaging was performed for only 6 months. However, this interval has been used by others to show the stability of an adrenal mass over time [11]. Furthermore, the growth of a lesion over time does not necessarily indicate malignancy because even benign adrenal adenomas grow.

In conclusion, incidental adrenal masses are common, and their proper characterization, especially in patients with cancer, is important. In clinical practice, unenhanced CT and chemical shift MRI are both used to differentiate lipid-rich adrenal adenomas from other adrenal masses. However, this study has shown that 62% of adenomas with unenhanced CT attenuation of greater than 10 H can be characterized as lipid-rich using quantitative chemical shift MRI.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Korobkin M, Francis IR, Kloos RT, Dunnick NR. The incidental adrenal mass. Radiol Clin North Am1996; 34:1037 –1054[Medline]
  2. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Yutzy GG, et al. Differentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas from using CT attenuation values. AJR 1996;166:531 –536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Mitchell DG, Crovello M, Matteucci T, Petersen RO, Miettinen MM. Benign adrenocortical masses: diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology1992; 185:345 –351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bilbey JH, McLoughlin RF, Kurkjian PS, et al. MR imaging of adrenal masses: value of chemical-shift imaging for distinguishing adenomas from other tumors. AJR1995; 164:637 –642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Huang AB, Birnbaum BA. Adrenal masses: correlation between CT attenuation value and chemical shift ratio at MR imaging with in-phase and opposed-phase sequences. Radiology1996; 200:749 –752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McNicholas MM, Lee MJ, Mayo-Smith WW, Hahn PF, Boland GW, Mueller PR. An imaging algorithm for the differential diagnosis of adrenal adenomas and metastases. AJR1995; 165:1453 –1459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, McNicholas MM, Mueller PR. Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature. AJR1998; 171:201 –204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fujiyoshi F, Nakajo M, Fukukura Y, Tsuchimochi S. Characterization of adrenal tumors by chemical shift fast low-angle shot MR imaging: comparison of four methods of quantitative evaluation. AJR2003; 180:1649 –1657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Mayo-Smith WM, Lee MJ, McNicholas MM, Hahn PF, Boland GW, Saini S. Characterization of adrenal masses (< 5 cm) by use of chemical shift MR imaging: observer performance versus quantitative measures. AJR 1995;165:91 –95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Dunnick NR. Delayed enhanced CT of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas. AJR2000; 175:1411 –1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, et al. Adrenal masses: characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. Radiology2002; 222:629 –633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Bae KT, Fuangtharnthip P, Prasad SR, Joe BN, Heiken JP. Adrenal masses: CT characterization with histogram analysis method. Radiology2003; 228:735 –742[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. T. Schindera, B. J. Soher, D. M. Delong, B. M. Dale, and E. M. Merkle
Effect of Echo Time Pair Selection on Quantitative Analysis for Adrenal Tumor Characterization with In-Phase and Opposed-Phase MR Imaging: Initial Experience
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 140 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. F. Faria, S. M. Goldman, J. Szejnfeld, H. Melo, C. Kater, P. Kenney, M. P. Huayllas, G. Demarchi, V. V. Francisco, C. Andreoni, et al.
Adrenal Masses: Characterization with in Vivo Proton MR Spectroscopy Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 788 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. K. Park, C. K. Kim, B. Kim, and J. H. Lee
Comparison of Delayed Enhanced CT and Chemical Shift MR for Evaluating Hyperattenuating Incidental Adrenal Masses
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 760 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. S. Jhaveri, F. Wong, S. Ghai, and M. A. Haider
Comparison of CT histogram analysis and chemical shift MRI in the characterization of indeterminate adrenal nodules.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1303 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krinsky, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krinsky, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS