|
|
||||||||
1 Service de Radiologie, UPRES EA 2705 (Maladies Vasculaires Pulmonaires),
Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Assistance
PubliqueHôpitaux de Paris, Université ParisSud, 157
rue de la Porte de Trivaux, Clamart 92140, France.
2 Service de Pneumologie et Réanimation Respiratoire, Hôpital
Antoine Béclère, Clamart 92140, France.
3 Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère,
Clamart 92140, France.
Received October 9, 2003;
accepted after revision January 21, 2004.
Address correspondence to A. Resten
(arnaud.resten{at}abc.ap-hop-paris.fr).
Abstract
|
|
|---|
MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed cross-referenced records from 1996 to 2001 in our departments of radiology and pathology and identified 15 patients with initial pretreatment CT scans who had pathologically confirmed pulmonary venoocclusive disease. Their CT scans were compared with the CT scans of 15 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed primary pulmonary hypertension. All patients had undergone a postmortem or posttransplantation examination.
RESULTS. Ground-glass opacities were significantly more frequent in pulmonary venoocclusive disease (p = 0.003); the opacities were abundant with random zonal predominance and preferentially centrilobular distribution (p = 0.03). Subpleural septal lines and adenopathy were also significantly more frequent (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION. On the initial pretreatment chest CT scan, the presence of ground-glass opacities (particularly with a centrilobular distribution), septal lines, and adenopathy are indicative of pulmonary venoocclusive disease in patients displaying pulmonary hypertension. Caution should be exercised before vasodilator therapy is initiated in the patients whose scans show such radiologic abnormalities.
|
|
|---|
Histopathologic diagnosis of pulmonary venoocclusive disease cannot generally be made by examination of transbronchial biopsy specimens, and an open biopsy is required. Because of the weakness of these patients, surgical biopsy is most often contraindicated and pulmonary venoocclusive disease remains a diagnosis made at autopsy or transplantation. Clearly, a noninvasive pretreatment screening method would be helpful to identify patients at risk for worsening of clinical symptoms resulting from inappropriate medical treatment. Consequently, the purpose of our study was to evaluate pulmonary venoocclusive disease noninvasively with CT of the chest.
|
|
|---|
|
We reviewed the cross-referenced records of the same two departments to identify 15 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed primary pulmonary hypertension (characterized by lesions of plexogenic arteriopathy without evidence of hemosiderosis or capillary and venous modifications [Fig. 1B]) and a reference pretreatment CT scan obtained within 2 weeks after admission. These 15 patients (four men and 11 women; mean age ± SD, 45.5 ± 17.6 years) constituted our reference group. The diagnosis of primary pulmonary hypertension was established in all patients via either a postmortem (n = 11) or posttransplantation (n = 4) examination.
|
Methods
The CT examination was performed within the first 2 weeks after admission
(study group, 2.6 ± 2.7 days; reference group, 4.7 ± 4.6 days)
before initiation of any vasodilator treatment and always included a
thin-section CT sequence and helical CT angiography. CT scans were obtained
using a HiSpeed scanner (General Electric Medical System) at end-inspiration
in the patients in the supine position. Thin-section CT was performed with
1-mm section thickness at 10-mm intervals; reconstruction matrix, 512 x
512; high-spatial-frequency reconstruction algorithm; field of view,
2834 cm; exposure, 1 sec; 130 kV; and 100 mAs, without injection of
contrast medium. For helical CT angiography, data were acquired with a
collimation of 3 mm and a pitch of 1.7, 180 mAs, 120 kV, and reconstruction of
overlapping images at 2-mm intervals. Helical CT was initiated at the level of
the aortic arch to the level of the inferior wall of the right ventricle, and
scanning was completed during a single breath-hold. We injected 140 mL of
contrast material ([iohexol] Omnipaque 300; Nycomed Ingenor) at a rate of
4.04.5 mL/sec and a delay of 1520 sec. Scans were photographed
with both soft-tissue (level, 30 H; width, 300 H) and lung (level, 600
H; width, 1,600 H) window settings.
CT scans were reviewed by three chest radiologists who were unaware of the pathologic diagnosis. Final decisions on the findings were reached by consensus.
Grading CT Scans
CT scans were assessed for the presence of different pathologic features
(Table 1). For ground-glass
opacities and septal lines, severity and zonal predominance were also taken
into account. Severity was rated on a 4-point scale according to the lung
parenchyma extension: Normal findings were coded as 0, no ground-glass
opacities or septal lines present; abnormal findings involving less than one
third of the lung were coded as 1, abnormal findings involving between one
third and two thirds of the lung were coded as 2, and pathologic findings
involving more than two thirds of the lungs were coded as 3.
|
Zonal predominance was assessed as upper or lower, subpleural or central, or random. The upper lung zone was defined as the area above the level of the carina, and the lower lung zone was defined as the area below this level. The subpleural lung zone was defined as the outer third of the lung, and the central lung zone was defined as the inner two thirds of the lung. Scans were deemed to show random predominance when abnormal findings were a mixture of upper and lower predominance or a mixture of central and subpleural predominance.
Ground-glass opacity was defined as increased opacity of the lung parenchyma not sufficient to obscure pulmonary vessels. Patterns of ground-glass opacities were divided into two categories according to the lobular distribution [10]: centrilobular distribution corresponded to poorly defined nodular opacities ranging in diameter from a few millimeters to 1 cm, and panlobular distribution corresponded to geographic regions of lung attenuation with relatively well-defined borders that were either homogeneous (involving all the parenchyma to an equal degree) or heterogeneous (having various degrees of increased attenuation throughout the parenchyma) [1113].
Septal lines corresponded to thickened interlobular septa (fine linear areas of attenuation or polygonal patterns of multiple polygonal lines), with smooth, irregular, or nodular borders. Mediastinal abnormalities evaluated included pericardial effusion, cardiomegaly, adenopathy (smallest diameter > 10 mm), enlargement of pulmonary arteries (ratio of the diameter of main pulmonary artery to that of the thoracic aorta, > 1 [14]), and pulmonary veins (subjective evaluation at the level of the left atrium).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using StatView software (version 4.5,
Abacus Concepts). Each CT finding was compared using the chi-square or the
Fisher's exact test. The null hypothesis was rejected with a p value
of less than 0.05. In such cases, sensitivity and specificity were also
calculated.
|
|
|---|
|
|
Ground-Glass Opacities
The presence of ground-glass opacities was significantly more frequent in
pulmonary venoocclusive disease than in primary pulmonary hypertension. The
zonal predominance of these opacities was most often random in the two groups
of patients (craniocaudal zonal predominance, p = 0.18; peripheral
zonal predominance, p = 0.52). The pattern of ground-glass opacities
was an important factor because a centrilobular pattern
(Fig. 2) was a significantly
more frequent finding in patients with pulmonary venoocclusive disease than
was the panlobular pattern (Fig.
3).
|
|
Septal Lines
For septal lines, CT showed smooth thickened interlobular septa in 16 (53%)
of the 30 patients in our study population
(Fig. 4). Fourteen (93%) of the
15 patients with pulmonary venoocclusive disease had thickened interlobular
septa, whereas two (13%) of the 15 patients with primary pulmonary
hypertension had thickened interlobular septa. Thus, thickened interlobular
septa were more frequent in pulmonary venoocclusive disease than in primary
pulmonary hypertension. In both pulmonary venoocclusive disease and primary
pulmonary hypertension, peripheral zonal predominance was preferentially
subpleural, with no craniocaudal zonal predominance noted.
|
Other Abnormal Parenchymal Findings
CT showed well-defined nodules in five patients, nonseptal lines in two
patients, honeycombing in one patient, bronchiectasis in two patients, and
emphysema in one patient. None of the abnormal findings correlated with the
presence of pulmonary venoocclusive disease (Fisher's exact test, p
> 0.05).
Pleural Effusion
CT showed a pleural effusion in six patients (20%)four (27%) of the
15 patients with pulmonary venoocclusive disease, and two (13%) of the 15
patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. These results were not
statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.65).
Mediastinal Findings
CT showed a pericardial effusion in 18 patients (60%), adenopathy (mean
± standard deviation, 15 ± 5 mm) in 12 patients (40%), a
right-sided chamber dilatation in 26 patients (87%), and a ratio greater than
1 between the diameters of the main pulmonary artery and the thoracic aorta in
29 patients (97%). The size of the primary pulmonary veins was normal in all
patients. Differences in CT findings for pulmonary venoocclusive disease and
primary pulmonary hypertension are summarized in
Table 1. Among the mediastinal
findings, only adenopathy was strongly correlated with pulmonary venoocclusive
disease (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.0001). Sensitivity and
specificity were 80% and 100%, respectively.
|
|
|---|
Our results support those in the literature [2, 7, 16]: ground-glass opacities and septal lines are highly suggestive of pulmonary venoocclusive disease. The pattern of ground-glass opacities varies from a minimal centrilobular patchy abnormality to an extensive diffuse inhomogeneous panlobular appearance [1719]. Rare cases of an homogeneous panlobular pattern have been described [11, 20]. In our study, only the centrilobular pattern correlated with pulmonary venoocclusive disease (p = 0.02), with a specificity of 73%. This relatively poor specificity of centrilobular nodules could be explained by the presence of cholesterol granulomas in primary pulmonary hypertension. According to Nolan et al. [21], these granulomas occur in as many as 25% of patients with primary pulmonary hypertension, but these nodules are solitary with no septal lines or adenopathy. In pulmonary venoocclusive disease, centrilobular opacities should correspond to the first stage of the disease. Later, if these patchy opacities involve large continuous areas, one would expect to see inhomogeneous panlobular ground-glass opacities.
The panlobular pattern was unusual in our study and was not statistically significant, probably because of an insufficient number of patients. Nevertheless, it seemed to be more frequent in pulmonary venoocclusive disease, particularly when the pattern was heterogeneous. In our experience, a homogeneous mosaic pattern of ground-glass opacities is suggestive of chronic thromboembolic disease, and a postembolic secondary pulmonary hypertension should be proposed as differential diagnosis.
Enlargement of lymph nodes in pulmonary venoocclusive disease has been described in the literature as less frequent than we found in our study [2, 8]. This discordance could be explained by the CT technique and the small size of our adenopathies (15 ± 5 mm). All our patients underwent helical CT angiography before thin-section imaging, a protocol contrary to those of the previous studies. Unless contrast medium is injected and thin-section CT (1-mm section thickness at 10-mm intervals) is performed, a small adenopathic lesion can be missed. The presence of adenopathy in a patient with pulmonary hypertension is an important finding. Adenopathy is unusual in primary pulmonary hypertension [2, 7, 8, 19]. Apart from its appearance in pulmonary venoocclusive disease, enlargement of lymph nodes has previously been described only as a finding in pulmonary hypertension due to chronic thromboembolic diseases [22] or left-sided heart failure [23]. In the absence of findings suggestive of the two latter diseases, adenopathy is highly predictive of pulmonary venoocclusive disease, with a specificity of 100%. Nevertheless, because of the relatively low sensitivity (80%), the absence of adenopathy does not permit pulmonary venoocclusive disease to be excluded from the differential diagnosis.
Contrary to the findings of other studies, our results concerning pleural effusion showed no statistical significance (p = 0.65), although pleural effusion was slightly more frequent in pulmonary venoocclusive disease. Pericardial effusion was a frequent finding in both pulmonary venoocclusive disease and primary pulmonary hypertension. This frequency could be explained by the high prevalence of pericardial effusion in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension [24, 25].
This study has some limitations. First, the number of patients was small because the occurrence of pulmonary venoocclusive disease is rare. However, approximately only 150 cases have been reported in the literature [2], and to our knowledge, our series of 15 patients with a pathologically proven diagnosis of pulmonary venoocclusive disease represents the largest to date. The lack of follow-up is another limitation because primary pulmonary hypertension can have a radiologic presentation that mimics pulmonary venoocclusive disease after several years of treatment [26]. Nevertheless, this distinction is particularly important before the initiation of medical treatment with prostacyclin, which is potentially fatal in patients with pulmonary venoocclusive disease. Finally, in all 30 patients, we had pathologic proof of the diagnosis of pulmonary venoocclusive disease or primary pulmonary hypertension, but unfortunately a comparison between each CT scan and pathologic findings was not feasible because the CT and pathologic examinations were not performed at the same time.
Our conclusion is that in patients with pulmonary hypertensionafter exclusion of secondary causes such as left-sided heart failure or chronic pulmonary thromboembolic diseasethe presence of ground-glass opacities with a centrilobular pattern (poorly defined centrilobular opacities), septal thickening, and adenopathy on the initial pretreatment CT scan should raise suspicions of pulmonary venoocclusive disease. Ground-glass opacities and septal lines have a high sensitivity for pulmonary venoocclusive disease, and the disease is unlikely in absence of these findings. The specificity of adenopathy is also high; if adenopathy is present, pulmonary venoocclusive disease is likely to be the correct diagnosis.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, N. Galie, M. M. Hoeper, M. Humbert, A. Torbicki, J.-L. Vachiery, J. A. Barbera, M. Beghetti, P. Corris, S. Gaine, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), endorsed by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2009; 30(20): 2493 - 2537. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Simonneau, I. M. Robbins, M. Beghetti, R. N. Channick, M. Delcroix, C. P. Denton, C. G. Elliott, S. P. Gaine, M. T. Gladwin, Z.-C. Jing, et al. Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1 Suppl): S43 - S54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Khaldi, S. Marchand-Adam, C. Kannengiesser, A. Fabre, M. P. Debray, C. Danel, M-A. Gougerot-Pocidalo, J. El Benna, M. Humbert, M. Aubier, et al. Diffuse interstitial pneumonia and pulmonary hypertension: a novel manifestation of chronic granulomatous disease Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2009; 33(6): 1498 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Dwyer, R. Smith, D. Challis, D. Reid, and D. Kilpatrick Granulomatous angiitis leading to a pulmonary veno-occlusive disease-like picture Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2009; 33(3): 666 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Montani, L. C. Price, P. Dorfmuller, L. Achouh, X. Jais, A. Yaici, O. Sitbon, D. Musset, G. Simonneau, and M. Humbert Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2009; 33(1): 189 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Galiè and A. Manes CHAPTER 24 Pulmonary Hypertension ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
National Pulmonary Hypertension Centres of the UK Consensus statement on the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice in the UK and Ireland Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(Suppl_1): i1 - i41. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
National Pulmonary Hypertension Centres of the UK Consensus statement on the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice in the UK and Ireland Thorax, March 1, 2008; 63(Suppl_2): ii1 - ii41. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Frazier, T. J. Franks, T.-L. H. Mohammed, I. H. Ozbudak, and J. R. Galvin From the Archives of the AFIP: Pulmonary Veno-occlusive Disease and Pulmonary Capillary Hemangiomatosis RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 867 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Coulden State-of-the-Art Imaging Techniques in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Proceedings of the ATS, September 1, 2006; 3(7): 577 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Castaner, X. Gallardo, J. Rimola, Y. Pallardo, J. M. Mata, J. Perendreu, C. Martin, and D. Gil Congenital and acquired pulmonary artery anomalies in the adult: radiologic overview. RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 349 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rabiller, X. Jais, A. Hamid, A. Resten, F. Parent, R. Haque, F. Capron, O. Sitbon, G. Simonneau, and M. Humbert Occult alveolar haemorrhage in pulmonary veno-occlusive disease Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 108 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Nunes, M Humbert, F Capron, M Brauner, O Sitbon, J-P Battesti, G Simonneau, and D Valeyre Pulmonary hypertension associated with sarcoidosis: mechanisms, haemodynamics and prognosis Thorax, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 68 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Provencher, X. Jais, A. Yaici, O. Sitbon, M. Humbert, and G. Simonneau Clinical Challenges in Pulmonary Hypertension: Roger S. Mitchell Lecture Chest, December 1, 2005; 128(6_suppl): 622S - 628S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Task Force members, N. Galie, A. Torbicki, R. Barst, P. Dartevelle, S. Haworth, T. Higenbottam, H. Olschewski, A. Peacock, G. Pietra, et al. Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: The Task Force on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2004; 25(24): 2243 - 2278. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |