AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urena, R.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Urena, R.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 183:1037-1039
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Interventional Radiology

Bird's Nest Filter Migration to the Right Atrium

Rocio Urena1 and Lee Greenwood1

1 Both authors: Department of Radiology, Hospital of Saint Raphael, 1540 Chapel St., New Haven, CT 06511.

Received August 12, 2003; accepted after revision May 17, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to R. Urena (rurena{at}srhs.org).


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
The placement of inferior vena cava filters has become a routine procedure in interventional radiology. The major indications for filter placement include patients who have deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and are unable to receive anticoagulation therapy or in whom anticoagulation therapy has failed and patients who are at high risk for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (i.e., after trauma or before surgery) [1].

Although clinically efficacious, filters are not exempt from complications. Major complications associated with inferior vena cava filters include intravascular or extravascular migration, thrombosis of the filter itself or of the inferior vena cava, and recurrent pulmonary emboli [2, 3].

Filter migration has been reported with all filters [49] but is rare with the bird's nest device. Although conventional radiographs can be used to diagnose filter migration, this case shows the importance of CT in confirming the diagnosis of migration. Moreover, we show how CT can be used to determine the clinical significance of the migration and the type of intervention needed to retrieve the device. We present a case of a bird's nest filter migration to the right atrium with cardiac tamponade.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
The patient was a 31-year-old obese man who presented to the emergency department with new onset of left pleuritic chest pain 2 weeks after beginning treatment for deep vein thrombosis. The patient had a history of pulmonary embolism 2 years earlier and a diagnosis of a hypercoagulation due to hyperhomocystinemia. The patient had not been compliant in taking oral warfarin and folic acid.

A chest CT scan obtained after pulmonary embolism protocol showed a large, partially obstructing embolus in the left lower lobe pulmonary artery branch and a large embolus in the right lower lobe pulmonary artery.

Considering the history of hyperhomocystinemia, noncompliance with the medication, and recurrent pulmonary embolism, we decided to place an inferior vena cava filter.

The left femoral vein was punctured as a result of right leg deep vein thrombosis. A 5-French pigtail catheter was placed within the low inferior vena cava and venography was performed. The inferior vena cava was noted to be free of filling defects. The renal veins were located at the L1 level. Measurement of the inferior vena cava was done electronically by using a 24-mm standard applied to the patient; this was also confirmed by direct measurement of the visualized inferior vena cava on the initial CT scan (lower images of chest CT). The inferior vena cava diameter was 34.7 mm, placing it beyond the range of a Greenfield vena cava filter in size. After the diagnostic study, a bird's nest filter (Cook) was successfully deployed below the renal veins. Injection of contrast material after filter placement showed no extravasation and good filter alignment (Fig. 1A). The patient tolerated the procedure well and received anticoagulation afterward to reduce further venous thrombosis.



View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 31-year-old man with history of pulmonary embolism. Cavogram after placement of bird's nest filter shows no extravasations of contrast material and good filter alignment.

 

Five days after placement of the inferior vena cava filter, the patient returned to the emergency department with chest pain and shortness of breath. A chest radiograph showed filter struts projecting over the right heart area (Fig. 1B). A chest CT scan showed new filling defects in the main pulmonary arteries, and the inferior vena cava bird's nest filter was seen in the right atrium. One of the struts appeared at the edge of the right atrium wall anteriorly, and pericardial effusion was present, suggestive of myocardial perforation (Fig. 1C). The patient was taken immediately to thoracic surgery for removal of the foreign body.



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 31-year-old man with history of pulmonary embolism. After filter placement 1 week earlier, chest radiograph shows filter struts projecting over right heart region.

 


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 31-year-old man with history of pulmonary embolism. Contrast-enhanced axial chest CT scan shows bilateral filling defects in lower pulmonary arteries (arrows) and filter struts at edge of right atrium with pericardial effusion (arrowheads).

 

An intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram showed a concentric pericardial effusion. The tricuspid valve function was normal. A standard median sternotomy was performed, and the pericardium was opened, relieving the acute tamponade and evacuating a significant amount of blood. A perforation site in the right atrium was found where one of the struts of the bird's nest filter had penetrated the atrial wall. The filter was engulfed by a significant clot that was intertwined in the wire nest of the filter. No other cardiac injury was found.

The patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to the cardiothoracic intensive care unit in stable condition. The patient was advised to have another inferior vena cava filter placed or possibly even bilateral iliac vein filters, but he refused further treatment. Several days later the patient suddenly died at the hospital, and an autopsy revealed massive pulmonary embolism as the cause of death.


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
The bird's nest filter was the first United States Food and Drug Adminstration–approved device for use in an inferior vena cava with a diameter greater than 28 mm. The filter is formed of four preshaped stainless steel wires that tangle together forming the nest and two V-shaped fixation struts. In 1986, the bird's nest filter was modified from its original design because of problems with filter migration. The original flexible, 25-mm-diameter struts were replaced with stiffer 0.46-mm-diameter wires [10]. The bird's nest filter has subsequently proven its effectiveness, with low rates of recurrent pulmonary embolism [10, 11].

Complications reported with the bird's nest filter include insertion site thrombosis, filter migration, strut erosion through the inferior vena cava wall, recurrent pulmonary embolism, inferior vena cava obstruction, lower extremity venous insufficiency, and fracture of the bird's nest filter strut [12, 13].

Filter migration with the bird's nest filter is rare compared with other filters [4]. Since the modification of the filter in 1986, approximately five cases of migration have been reported. In 1992, Rogoff et al. [7] reported the first two cases of cephalic migration associated with massive thromboembolism. In 1996, White and McLean [8] reported a case of inferior strut migration with massive thromboembolization. Additionally, two unreported cases in 1994 were obtained from the manufacturer's registry [7, 8].

In all cases, the migration has been discovered in the first 7 days after the filter placement. The cases described by Rogoff et al. occured at 1 and 7 days, by White and McLean at 7 days, and by the Cook filter registry at 1 and 3 days. Our case presented at 5 days after filter placement.

The exact time of migration is unknown. Previous reported cases have been related to massive embolization, suggesting that at times a large migrating clot overwhelms the filter. We are not sure in our patient what came first, the massive clot or the filter migration; however, the deep imbedding of the clot in the filter suggests to us that the filter migration was the result of a large thromboembolism impacting the filter.

Studies with animals have shown that strut and wire-mesh endothelization in the caval wall does not occur until 2 weeks after placement [14, 15], which suggests that the first 2 weeks after filter placement is the most critical time for possible migration.

Our case is similar to one described by Rogoff et al. [7] in which a patient presented with clinical cardiac tamponade and required emergent surgery; however, we performed chest CT before surgical intervention. Although some cases of filter migration can be treated with percutaneous foreign body retrieval, this is inherently more difficult with the large amorphous bird's nest device and, as in our patient, the atrial wall was perforated by the rigid struts of the device.

Surgery was considered the best means of removal in our patient and must be strongly considered in cases of bird's nest filter migration. In our case, chest CT was important in helping us decide the best approach for safe retrieval of the patient's migrated filter. CT not only enabled the diagnosis of the filter migration, but it also clearly showed the pericardial effusion and pinpointed the exact strut responsible for the perforation. In a case report of a TrapEase (Cordis Europa NV) filter migration to the heart, CT was also helpful in assessing the position, the amount of clot, and the need for surgical treatment instead of percutaneous retrieval [9].

Because the bird's nest filter migration has been associated with massive thromboembolism, perhaps it may not be the best filter option in patients with a large clot. Theoretically, a filter with side struts and extra hooks on the strut may offer an added advantage. In patients with an oversized vena cava, however, the filter options are limited. These options include the bird's nest filter and the Vena Tech LGM (Braun), both of which accommodate larger venae cavae. Additionally, bilateral iliac vein filters have been successfully used [16, 17].


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Walsh DB, Birkmeyer JD, Barret JA. Use of inferior vena cava filters in the Medicare population. Ann Vasc Surg1995; 9:483 -487[Medline]
  2. Joels CS, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Am Surg2003; 69:654 -659[Medline]
  3. Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Selby BJ. Inferior vena cava filters: indications, safety, effectiveness. Arch Intern Med1992; 152:1985 -1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Castaneda F, Herrera M, Cragg AH, et al. Migration of a Kimray-Greenfield filter to the right ventricle. Radiology1983; 149:690[Free Full Text]
  5. Dorsa FB, Gindea AJ, Kralik M, Tice DA. Misplaced Greenfield filter: diagnosis by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1992;5:437 -438[Medline]
  6. Deutsch L-S. Percutaneous removal of intracardiac Greenfield vena cava filter. AJR1988; 151:677 -679[Free Full Text]
  7. Rogoff PA, Hilgenberg AD, Miller SL, Stephan SM. Cephalic migration of the bird's nest inferior vena caval filter: report of two cases. Radiology1992; 184:819 -822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. White KE, McLean GK. Bird's nest filter: inferior strut migration during massive thromboenbolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1996;7:537 -540[Medline]
  9. Porcellini M, Stassano P, Musumeci A, Bracale G. Intracardiac migration of nitinol TrapEase vena cava filter and paradoxical embolism. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2002; 22:460 -461[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Roehm JOF, Johsrude IS, Barth MH, Gianturco C. The bird's nest inferior vena cava filter: progress report. Radiology1988; 168:745 -749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Nicholson A, Ettles D, Paddon A, Dyet J. Long term follow up of the bird's nest IVC filter. Clin Radiol1999; 54:759 -764[Medline]
  12. Tardy B, Mismetti P, Page Y, et al. Symptomatic inferior vena cava filter thrombosis: clinical study of thirty consecutive cases. Eur Respir J 1996;9:2012 -2016[Abstract]
  13. Perry JM, Wells IP. Structural failure of a bird's nest inferior vena cava filter. Clin Radiol1994 :49:431 -432[Medline]
  14. Giantrurco C, Abderson JH, Wallace S. A new vena cava filter: experimental animal evaluation. Radiology1980; 137:835 -837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Burke PE, Michna BA, Harvey CF, Crute SL, Sobel M, Greenfield LJ. Experimental comparison of percutaneous vena caval devices: titanium Greenfield filter versus bird's nest filter. J Vasc Surg 1987;6:66 -70[Medline]
  16. Millward SF, Aquino J Jr, Peterson RA. Oversized inferior vena cava: use of a single Vena Tech-LGM filter. Can Assoc Radiol J 1996;47:272 -274[Medline]
  17. Baron HC, Klapholz A, Nagy AA, Wayne M. Bilateral iliac vein filter deployment in a patient with megacava. Ann Vasc Surg1999; 13:634 -636[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
C. A. Owens, J. T. Bui, M-G. Knuttinen, R. C. Gaba, T. C. Carrillo, N. Hoefling, and J. E. Layden-Almer
Intracardiac Migration of Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Review of Published Data
Chest, September 1, 2009; 136(3): 877 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. O. F. Roehm Jr.
Bird's Nest Filter Migration to the Right Atrium
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 555 - 556.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urena, R.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Urena, R.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS