AJR Not a Member? Click to Join ARRS!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arepally, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arepally, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 183:1071-1074
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Hepatobiliary Imaging

Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Staging with Intrabiliary MRI

Aravind Arepally1, Christos Georgiades1, Lawrence V. Hofmann1, Michael Choti2, Paul Thuluvath3 and David A. Bluemke1

1 The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Blalock 544, 600 N Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287.
2 Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, MD.
3 Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, MD.

Received December 28, 2004; accepted after revision March 8, 2004.

 
A. Arepally is a 2003–2004 American Roentgen Ray Society Scholar.

Address correspondence to A. Arepally (aarepall{at}rad.jhu.edu).


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Percutaneous Transhepatic...
Intrabiliary MRI
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary malignant liver tumor. Globally, the hepatocellular–cholangiocellular carcinoma ratio is 3:1 and varies from 1:1 in some Northern European countries to greater than 10:1 in Southeast Asia [1]. Despite improvements in surgical technique and advances in chemotherapy, the prognosis remains dismal. In patients with potentially resectable disease, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates are 68%, 30%, and 11%, respectively [2].

Resectability of the biliary malignancies is dependent on the local extent of tumor in the adjacent liver parenchyma, vascular and lymphatic invasion, and lymph node involvement. Despite advances in imaging technology, the overall accuracy for assessing resectability is 60% for both multiphasic helical imaging and MRI [3]. Even after optimum planning before surgery, 25–40% of patients who were deemed to have resectable tumors were found to have unresectable tumors at surgery [4]. Therefore, accurate planning before surgery and assessment of resectability are essential in the evaluation of patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

Recent advances in miniature coil designs have allowed placement of MRI receiver coils directly in both arteries and veins for MRI. Intravascular coils allow superior spatial resolution and increased signal-to-noise ratio in the tissue immediately adjacent to the coil. By decreasing the field of view, we can achieve 100- to 200-µm resolution of arterial wall disease [5]. For similar reasons, we hypothesized that coil technology may be adapted to the assessment of other deep structures in the body, such as the biliary tree, where external coils may have limitations. We describe the technique and imaging features for two patients who successfully underwent intrabiliary MRI through indwelling biliary access.


Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography–Biliary Drainage
Top
Introduction
Percutaneous Transhepatic...
Intrabiliary MRI
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
Access to the biliary tree was required in both patients to provide decompression and cholangiography to fully delineate the biliary tree. Biliary access was achieved in a standard fashion under fluoroscopic visualization using a two-step technique of opacifying the biliary tree with a 22-gauge needle (Chiba, Cook Inc.) and puncturing a peripheral right posterior duct with a 21-gauge trocar needle. After placement of a dilator-sheath assembly set (Neff Percutaneous Access Set, Cook Inc.), the occluded biliary duct was traversed with a hydrophilic guidewire and a 10-French biliary drainage catheter (Boston Scientific) was inserted in a standard fashion over a stiff guidewire.


Intrabiliary MRI
Top
Introduction
Percutaneous Transhepatic...
Intrabiliary MRI
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
Intrabiliary MRI was performed along with conventional MRI for tumor staging after biliary decompression for 1–2 weeks. Because some of the biliary tubes have metallic braiding, they were removed over a standard guidewire and replaced with an 8-French vascular sheath with the tip placed in the duodenum under fluoroscopic guidance. The Intercept Esophageal Internal MRI Coil (Surgivision) (Fig. 1B) was inserted through the sheath into the area of interest.



View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 62-year-old woman with history of Whipple surgery. Cholangiogram shows insertion of MRI receiver coil (arrow) into right biliary tube.

 

The Intercept coil (Figs. 1B, 2A, and 2B) is an 8-French, 75-cm-long catheter that can be readily inserted into a standard biliary tube 10-French or larger without the use of guidewires. The current imaging length is 5 cm with a field of view of 8–24 cm with high spatial resolution. These receiver coils are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved devices designed for internal imaging of the esophagus, aorta, and surrounding area. The MRI coil was placed in the vascular sheath with the 5-cm imaging length of the wire placed in the area of interest.



View larger version (188K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. Intercept Esophageal Internal MRI Coil (Surgivision). Photgraphs show coil is 8-French, 75-cm-long catheter (A) and inserts through existing biliary tube access (B).

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. Intercept Esophageal Internal MRI Coil (Surgivision). Photgraphs show coil is 8-French, 75-cm-long catheter (A) and inserts through existing biliary tube access (B).

 

After placement of the receiver coils (Figs. 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B), both patients were transferred to the MRI suite for further imaging. The receiver coils were secured to the sheath using sterile tape to prevent movement during the transfer to the MRI unit. Breath-hold coronal and axial oblique MR images were obtained on a 1.5-T MRI system (CV/i, GE Healthcare). MRI sequences were obtained with an intrabiliary MRI coil as one channel of a phased array, with two additional anterior and one posterior surface coils forming the phased-array coil. T1-weighted images (2D spoiled gradient-recalled echo [TR/TE, 100/2.8; flip angle, 70°] and 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo breath-hold [4.1/1.6; flip angle, 15°]), T2-weighted fast spin-echo images (3,000/105; echo-train length, 16), and single-shot fast spin-echo images (infinite/90) were acquired. T1-weighted images were obtained before and at 20 sec and 70 sec after 0.1 mmol/kg of IV gadodiamide (Omniscan, Amersham Health) was administered. Sequences were prescribed so that the in-plane resolution was approximately 150–200 µm (field of view, 8–12 cm; frequency imaging matrix, 512; 256 phase encodes interpolated to 512 pixels).



View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 62-year-old woman with history of Whipple surgery. Overwire cholangiogram shows obstruction of common bile duct at level of surgical anastomosis.

 


Case 1
Top
Introduction
Percutaneous Transhepatic...
Intrabiliary MRI
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
The patient was a 62-year-old woman who initially presented 4 years earlier with relatively acute onset of abdominal pain, fever, chills, nausea or vomiting, and a 5-cm obstructing mass at the ampulla. After staging with cross-sectional imaging, she underwent a radical Whipple procedure. She was discharged after an uneventful recovery, and biliary drains were removed after 1 month. Four years later she presented with complaints of abdominal pain, fever, chills, and elevated level of alkaline phosphatase. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography or percutaneous biliary drainage showed complete occlusion of the common bile duct at the hepaticojejunostomy. Because of her history, the differential diagnosis was either benign biliary stricture or recurrent tumor.

Intrabiliary MRI was performed through the existing biliary access. Figures 1C and 1D were obtained after gadolinium-enhanced MRI without (Fig. 1C) and with (Fig. 1D) the intrabiliary coil. As shown in the figures, placement of the intrabiliary coil increased the signal-to-noise ratio and enhanced the visualization of the adjacent liver parenchyma. The biliary lumen had increased signal with better delineation of the biliary wall from the adjacent structures. Intrabiliary MRI showed no discernible masses. Biliary biopsies showed reactive, inflammatory tissue and fibrosis and no evidence of neoplasm. Because of these findings, the patient was percutaneously treated under the diagnosis of postoperative biliary stricture.



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 62-year-old woman with history of Whipple surgery. Gadolinium-enhanced MR image (3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo; TR/TE, 5.8/2.1; flip angle, 12°) obtained 4 months before patient presented with biliary obstruction shows liver without receiver coil. Circle surrounds common bile duct.

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 62-year-old woman with history of Whipple surgery. Gadolinium-enhanced MR image (3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo; 4.1/1.6; flip angle, 15°) of liver shows intrabiliary receiver coil in place. Note increased signal from common bile duct in comparison with B. No tumor was identified.

 


Case 2
Top
Introduction
Percutaneous Transhepatic...
Intrabiliary MRI
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
The patient was a 48-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with painless jaundice and elevated level of bilirubin. CT revealed a hilar mass and dilated intrahepatic biliary system. After decompression with bilateral percutaneous biliary drains, he underwent biopsy, which confirmed hilar cholangiocarcinoma or Klatskin's tumor. On the basis of CT and standard MRI evaluation, the patient was found to be a candidate for surgical evaluation; however, he opted for alternative therapies and declined surgery. The patient returned 4 months later for surgical evaluation. At that time, he was still considered a surgical candidate on the basis of cholangiography. Intrabiliary MRI was performed to better delineate liver involvement. Intrabiliary MR images (Figs. 3A and 3B) showed local liver invasion and the extension into the bifurcation of the right anteroposterior ductal system. Images obtained lower in the common bile duct also showed invasion of the tumor into the adjacent liver. On standard cholangiograms, this degree of involvement was not visible.



View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 48-year-old man with painless jaundice. Intrabiliary MR image (axial fast spin-echo; TR/TE, 7,000/100; echo-train length, 22; thickness, 4 mm; matrix, 512 x 512; field of view, 17.9 x 17.9) shows abnormal soft-tissue mass extending from common bile duct to adjacent liver parenchyma (short arrow). Normal common bile duct (long solid arrow) and intrabiliary coil (dashed arrow) are also seen.

 


View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 48-year-old man with painless jaundice. Intrabiliary MR image (axial fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo; 125/1.7; thickness, 4 mm; matrix, 512 x 512; field of view, 17.9 x 17.9) shows extension of tumor to bifurcation of right anterior and right posterior ductal system. RT = right.

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Percutaneous Transhepatic...
Intrabiliary MRI
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
Cholangiocarcinoma is a neoplasm with usually late presentation. It can be multifocal and exhibit periductal invasion, thus making delineation on regular cross-sectional imaging difficult. Hepatectomy for cholangiocarcinoma can be a challenging procedure and has a long convalescence period. Morbidity rates are rather high, with 44% of patients suffering a major postoperative complication and a nearly 10% overall mortality rate [6].

In patients with malignant obstruction, staging and evaluation before operation are critical in identifying candidates for surgical resection. Despite advances in CT and MRI, these imaging techniques can be insufficient in identifying the presence or the extent of tumor involvement with regard to biliary malignancy. Because of the difficulty in identifying subtle biliary malignancies, many patients often undergo repeated imaging before an accurate diagnosis can be made. Also, additional invasive studies such as ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography are also used for proper diagnosis and staging before surgery. The use of intrabiliary MRI in our two patients expedited the imaging process and allowed rapid diagnosis and staging at the same setting. In the first patient, the absence of a soft-tissue mass in an area that is notoriously difficult to visualize on routine axial imaging allowed the proper diagnosis of biliary stricture, which was also confirmed with biopsies. In the second patient, the improvement in visualization of the adjacent liver made it possible to identify tumor infiltration into the right posterior ducts that was not identified on cholangiography.

Advances in MRI coil designs have allowed placement of MRI receiver coils in various lumens to enhance clinical MRI. First described by Kantor et al. [6] for spectroscopic imaging of the canine heart, the coils have seen gradual improvement in design and size over the past decade. Initial catheters were fairly bulky and relatively inflexible, requiring long imaging times. Kandarpa et al. [7] constructed a single-loop multiturn coil and were able to acquire ex vivo images of human arterial specimens. Designed on an 8-French polytetrafluoroethylene catheter, this device was fairly large but was not tested on in vivo studies. A more recent design by Ocali and Atalar [8] involves a loopless dipole catheter that directly interfaces with the MRI scanner and optimizes the match of frequency of the radiofrequency coil to the scanner for improved signal reception. In addition, this catheter is smaller in size, has improved longitudinal coverage, and is more flexible. The catheter we currently use is the Intercept, a modification of the catheter designed by Ocali and Atalar.

The relatively small size and flexibility of the Intercept coil allow easy delivery into an 8-French vascular sheath. Through the use of this catheter, it is anticipated that improved imaging of multiple organ systems will be possible, including transesophageal aortic plaque imaging, esophageal cancer staging, and, potentially, prostate and urethra imaging.

The placement of intrabiliary MRI receiver coils directly in the biliary system served to improve the imaging resolution of the biliary tract by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio. The intrabiliary MRI technique provides two advantages. When the receiver coil is placed directly in the biliary system, the field of view is decreased without significant phase-wrap artifact and allows high in-plane resolution. The coil also produces increased signal in the biliary lumen alone, which provides contrast between the biliary lumen, biliary wall, and adjacent structures. With these two advantages, improved imaging of the biliary tree is possible with superior signa-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios.

In conclusion, these two cases show the potential impact of intrabiliary MRI. This technique provides near microscopic resolution of the biliary tree compared with conventional MRI. Not only was the presence of a tumor mass identified, but tumor margins were better delineated and the level of invasion was discernible. Intrabiliary MRI allowed us to improve the accuracy of staging before surgery for cholangiocarcinoma. This technique can potentially minimize needless surgery and its associated morbidity, mortality, and cost.


References
Top
Introduction
Percutaneous Transhepatic...
Intrabiliary MRI
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 

  1. Okuda K, Nakanuma Y, Miyazaki M. Cholangiocarcinoma: recent progress. 1. Epidemiology and etiology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;17:1049 -1055[Medline]
  2. Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Johns Hopkins approach. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg2000; 7:115 -121[Medline]
  3. Choi BI, Han JK, Shin YM, Baek SY, Han MC. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of MRI with CT. Abdom Imaging 1995;20:357 -360[Medline]
  4. Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, et al. Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2001;234:507 -517[Medline]
  5. Atalar E, Bottomley PA, Ocali O, et al. High resolution intravascular MRI and MRS by using a catheter receiver coil. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:596 -605[Medline]
  6. Kantor HL, Briggs RW, Balaban RS. In vivo 31P nuclear magnetic resonance measurements in canine heart using a catheter-coil. Circ Res 1984;55:261 -266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kandarpa K, Jakab P, Patz S, Schoen FJ, Jolesz FA. Prototype miniature endoluminal MR imaging catheter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1993;4:419 -427[Medline]
  8. Ocali O, Atalar E. Intravascular magnetic resonance imaging using a loopless catheter antenna. Magn Reson Med1997; 37:112 -118[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arepally, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arepally, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS