AJR Not a Member? Click to Join ARRS!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 183:1075-1077
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Hepatobiliary Imaging

Imaging Findings of Hepatic Sinusoidal Dilatation

Dal Mo Yang1, Dong Hae Jung2, Chul Hi Park1, Jee Eun Kim1 and Soo Jin Choi1

1 Department of Radiology, Gachon Medical School, Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-Dong, Namdong-Gu, Incheon 405-760, South Korea.
2 Department of Pathology, Gachon Medical School, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea.

Received December 18, 2003; accepted after revision January 20, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to D. M. Yang (dmyang{at}ghil.com).


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Hepatic sinusoidal dilatation is a vascular lesion that has been described as a complication of oral contraceptive therapy [1]. It may also be associated with several other conditions such as pregnancy, granulomatous disease, neoplasm, rheumatoid arthritis, HIV infection, and Hodgkin's disease [24]. Although several reports have described the pathologic features of hepatic sinusoidal dilatation, information is scarce regarding its imaging features. To our knowledge, the enhancement characteristics of hepatic sinusoidal dilatation on helical CT and MRI have not been described. We describe the imaging findings in a case of hepatic sinusoidal dilatation that mimicked hepatic tumor.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
A 19-year-old woman who had undergone vaginal delivery a month before admission was transferred to our hospital for lower abdominal pain. A sonographic examination at the other hospital disclosed a large pelvic cystic mass. She had no pertinent medical history. A physical examination showed low abdominal tenderness and rebound tenderness. Laboratory findings revealed an elevated WBC (13.6 x 103/µL) and alkaline phosphatase level (649 U/L). Results of the remaining liver function tests were normal.

Abdominal helical CT (Somatom Plus 4, Siemens) was performed after the IV administration of 120 mL of iopromide (Ultravist 300, Schering). Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver was performed with 8-mm collimation, 1:1 table pitch, and 8-mm reconstruction during the portal phase (60 sec after start of the injection) and during the delayed phase (3 min after injection). Portal phase CT scans showed a heterogeneously hypodense lesion in the right hepatic lobe (Fig. 1A), and delayed phase CT scans showed that the lesion was isodense with respect to the liver parenchyma (Fig. 1B). In the pelvis, a 14 x 4 cm cystic mass with a thick wall was found. Because of a diagnosis of a pelvic abscess, percutaneous drainage was performed with sonographic guidance, and 90 mL of yellow pus was aspirated.



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 19-year-old woman with hepatic sinusoidal dilatation. Portal phase helical CT scan shows heterogeneously hypodense lesion (arrow) in right hepatic lobe.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 19-year-old woman with hepatic sinusoidal dilatation. Delayed phase helical CT scan shows lesion is isodense to adjacent liver parenchyma.

 

Abdominal MRI was then performed with a 1.5-T scanner (Magnetom Vision, Siemens). On T1-weighted images (fast low-angle shot [FLASH] technique; TR/TE, 187/4.8; flip angle, 75°), the hepatic lesion was isointense to the adjacent liver parenchyma (Fig. 1C). On T2-weighted images (HASTE; infinite/90; flip angle, 150°), the hepatic lesion was slightly hyperintense and vessellike structures were observed within the lesion (Fig. 1D). T1-weighted dynamic images using a multisection FLASH sequence (105/2.2; flip angle, 70°) were obtained 10 sec, 40 sec, and 2 min after the administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The hepatic lesion showed an enhancement pattern resembling that of CT. The lesion was heterogeneously hypointense on arterial phase images and isointense relative to the liver parenchyma on delayed phase images. A core biopsy of the hepatic lesion was performed under sonographic guidance. On sonography, the hepatic lesion was hypoechoic relative to the surrounding liver (Fig. 1E). A microscopic examination showed hepatic sinusoidal dilatation (Fig. 1F).



View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 19-year-old woman with hepatic sinusoidal dilatation. T1-weighted MR image shows lesion is isointense to adjacent liver parenchyma.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 19-year-old woman with hepatic sinusoidal dilatation. T2-weighted MR image shows lesion is slightly hyperintense (large arrow). Healthy vascular structures (small arrows) are seen within lesion.

 


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. 19-year-old woman with hepatic sinusoidal dilatation. Sonogram shows lesion (arrow) is hypoechoic.

 


View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F. 19-year-old woman with hepatic sinusoidal dilatation. Photomicrograph of fine-needle biopsy specimen of hepatic lesion shows dilatation of hepatic sinusoid. (H and E, x100)

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Hepatic sinusoidal dilatation usually occurs in young women with a history of longterm oral contraceptive use. It is manifested by right upper quadrant abdominal pain, hepatomegaly, and minimal elevation of liver function tests [1]. Hepatic sinusoidal dilatation induced by oral contraceptive use, with involvement of the periportal zone (Rappaport classification I), is characteristic of this condition [1]. High estrogen doses associated with oral contraceptive use have been linked with this adverse hepatic reaction, and the discontinuation of the oral contraceptives results in regression of the liver disease [1]. Periportal sinusoidal dilatation may occur during pregnancy and induces the secretion of estrogen and progesterone [2]. We believe that the hepatic sinusoidal dilatation in our patient was related to her pregnancy.

Microscopically, hepatic sinusoidal dilatation is characterized by focal dilatation of the sinusoidal spaces associated with hepatocyte atrophy and necrosis [5]. Anoxic hepatocyte necrosis results in acute inflammatory reaction and subsequent early intrasinusoidal fibrosis [5].

Imaging findings of hepatic sinusoidal dilatation have been reported sporadically [1, 2]; the condition has been found to be echogenic compared with the surrounding the liver on sonography [1]. On angiography, hepatic sinusoidal dilatation is revealed as multiple ill-defined focal collections of contrast material along the liver that are visualized during the late arterial phase and become more prominent during the parenchymal and venous phases [2]. However, to our knowledge, the CT and MRI findings of hepatic sinusoidal dilatation have not been previously reported. In our patient, hepatic sinusoidal dilatation was revealed as heterogeneously hypodense during the portal phase and as isodense to the surrounding liver during the delayed phase. On MR images, hepatic sinusoidal dilatation was isointense to the surrounding liver on the T1-weighted image and slightly hyperintense on the T2-weighted image. Enhancement characteristics on MR images were similar to those on CT scans.

Before the biopsy, we believed that this lesion was a hepatic tumor or an inflammatory mass. In a retrospective review, however, we noted an interesting MRI finding—namely, the crossing vascular structures within the lesion. Large hepatic neoplasms usually show a hepatic vascular distortion or compression, but an extension of the healthy hepatic vessels through hepatic neoplasm is quite rare [6]. Therefore, the crossing vascular structure within the lesion is a useful finding that distinguishes hepatic sinusoidal dilatation from hepatic neoplasm.

Peliosis hepatis is another consideration in the differential diagnosis. Peliosis hepatis is an unusual disorder characterized by multiple blood-filled spaces within the liver [7]. It is important to differentiate between hepatic sinusoidal dilatation and peliosis hepatis because the morbidity rate is higher for the latter [2]. In addition, peliosis hepatis may cause intrahepatic and peritoneal hemorrhage. Hepatic sinusoidal dilatation can be differentiated from peliosis hepatis by contrast-enhancement patterns on CT, MRI, and angiography. In peliosis hepatis, the enhancement characteristics are variable in size. Small peliosis hepatis usually produces normal CT findings, but large peliosis hepatis shows early vessellike enhancement on CT, MRI, and angiography [2, 7, 8]. In comparison, hepatic sinusoidal dilatation shows delayed enhancement, unlike peliosis hepatis.

In conclusion, although rare, a diagnosis of hepatic sinusoidal dilatation should be considered when dynamic CT shows a hypodense lesion during arterial and portal phase imaging and a lesion that is isodense to the adjacent liver parenchyma on delayed phase images. MRI shows isointensity on T1-weighted images, hyperintensity on T2-weighted images, and enhancement characteristics resembling those of CT. Both dynamic CT scans and MR images show the healthy hepatic vascular structures crossing the lesion.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Weinberger M, Garty M, Cohen M, Russo Y, Rosenfeld JB. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis and follow-up of hepatic sinusoidal dilatation. Arch Intern Med1985; 145:927 -929[Abstract]
  2. Fisher MR, Neiman HL. Periportal sinusoidal dilatation associated with pregnancy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol1984; 7:299 -302[Medline]
  3. Curciarello J, Castelletto R, Barbero R, et al. Hepatic sinusoidal dilatation associated to giant lymph node hyperplasia (Castleman's): a new case in a patient with periorbital xanthelasmas and history of celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol1998; 27:76 -78[Medline]
  4. Laffon A, Moreno A, Gutierrez-Bucero A, Ossorio C, Sabando P, Moreno-Otero R. Hepatic sinusoidal dilatation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Gastroenterol1989; 11:653 -657[Medline]
  5. Oligny LL, Lough J. Hepatic sinusoidal ectasia. Hum Pathol 1992;23:953 -956[Medline]
  6. Apicella PL, Mirowitz SA, Weinreb JC. Extension of vessels through hepatic neoplasm: MR and CT findings. Radiology1994; 191:135 -136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gouya H, Vignaux O, Legmann P, de Pigneux G, Bonnin A. Peliosis of hepatis: triphasic helical CT and dynamic MRI findings. Abdom Imaging 2001;26:507 -509[Medline]
  8. Marves CK, Caron KH, Bisset GS III, Agarwal R. Splenic and hepatic peliosis: MR findings. AJR1992; 158:75 -76[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Ward, J. A. Guthrie, M. B. Sheridan, S. Boyes, J. T. Smith, D. Wilson, J. I. Wyatt, D. Treanor, and P. J. Robinson
Sinusoidal Obstructive Syndrome Diagnosed With Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Chemotherapy-Treated Colorectal Liver Metastases
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2008; 26(26): 4304 - 4310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS