AJR 2004; 183:1275-1283
© American Roentgen Ray Society
Spectrum of Imaging Findings After Intestinal, Liver-Intestinal, or Multivisceral Transplantation: Part 1, Posttransplantation Anatomy
Karin M. Unsinn1,2,
Alfred Koenigsrainer3,
Michael Rieger2,
Benedikt V. Czermak2,
Helmut Ellemunter1,
Raimund Margreiter3,
Werner R. Jaschke2 and
Martin C. Freund2
1 Department of Pediatrics, Leopold-Franzens University, Anichstrasse 35,
Innsbruck A-6020, Austria.
2 Department of Radiology, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck,
Austria.
3 Department of General Surgery and Transplantation Surgery, Leopold-Franzens
University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Received December 27, 2003;
accepted after revision March 9, 2004.
Address correspondence to K. M. Unsinn.
Introduction
Intestinal transplantation is an alternative in patients with
irreversible chronic intestinal failure in order to restore enteral absorption
of ingested food and fluid. In adults, the most common cause of chronic
intestinal failure results from extensive resection of the small bowel because
of occlusion of the superior mesenteric vessels, inflammatory bowel disease,
or abdominal trauma. In children, the causes of short-bowel syndrome are
midgut volvulus, gastroschisis, intestinal atresia, and necrotizing
enterocolitis. Intestinal failure infrequently results from permanent
intestinal dysfunction despite normal intestinal length. This occurs more
frequently in children and includes aganglionosis; malabsorption syndromes,
particularly microvillus inclusion disease; and motility disorders,
particularly intestinal pseudoobstruction
[1].
Intestinal transplantation with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression
started in the 1980s in North America
[2] and Europe
[3] and was followed by
multivisceral transplantation
[4,
5] and liver-intestinal
transplantation [6]. Isolated
intestinal transplantation is indicated for patients with irreversible
intestinal failure without liver dysfunction and serious total parenteral
nutrition-related complications, mostly lack of venous access due to recurrent
thrombosis. Liver-intestinal transplantation is primarily indicated for
patients with intestinal failure and total parenteral nutrition-related
cholestatic liver failure. Multivisceral transplantation is indicated for
patients with irreversible failure of the small bowel and liver combined with
portomesenteric thrombosis or Gardner's syndrome with intraabdominal desmoid
tumor [7].
Proper interpretation of imaging studies after transplantation depends on
familiarity with surgical anatomy
[8-11].
For this reason, this pictorial essay schematically illustrates the
intraoperative appearance during the most important steps of the main
intestinal transplantation procedures performed in children and adults. Each
procedure is supplemented with examples of typical anatomy as shown by various
imaging techniques including sonography, CT, MRI, gastrointestinal contrast
series, and angiography.
The various procedures of small-bowel transplantation are described and
illustrated in the following order: intestinal, multivisceral, and
liver-intestinal transplantation.
Intestinal Transplantation
The postoperative anatomy of isolated transplantation of the small bowel in
a cadaveric donor [7] is
schematically shown in Figures
1A,
1B,
1C, although living related
intestinal transplantation has already been performed
[12]. During procurement, the
size-matched donor small bowel and an arterial and venous main stem are
excised. The ileum is transected proximal to the ileocecal valve, and the
jejunum is divided close to the ligament of Treitz; especially the ileal
branches of the ileocolic artery should be preserved.

View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1A. Schematic illustrations of isolated intestinal
transplantation. Ao = abdominal aorta, CIA = common iliac artery, d = donor,
IVC = inferior vena cava, L = liver, r = recipient, S = spleen, ST = stomach,
SMA = superior mesenteric artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, TI =
temporary ileostomy, single arrow = duodenojejunal anastomosis, double arrows
= ileocolonic anastomosis, open arrowhead = superior mesenteric vein stump,
solid arrowhead = venous extension graft, black asterisk = intestinal graft,
white asterisk = residual recipient colon. Illustration shows intestinal graft
after explantation and ex situ preparation on back-table.
|
|

View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1B. Schematic illustrations of isolated intestinal
transplantation. Ao = abdominal aorta, CIA = common iliac artery, d = donor,
IVC = inferior vena cava, L = liver, r = recipient, S = spleen, ST = stomach,
SMA = superior mesenteric artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, TI =
temporary ileostomy, single arrow = duodenojejunal anastomosis, double arrows
= ileocolonic anastomosis, open arrowhead = superior mesenteric vein stump,
solid arrowhead = venous extension graft, black asterisk = intestinal graft,
white asterisk = residual recipient colon. Illustration shows intraoperative
appearance of recipient site after heterotopic intestinal transplantation.
End-to-side anastomosis of recipient common iliac artery to donor superior
mesenteric artery and donor superior mesenteric vein to recipient inferior
vena cava are also depicted.
|
|

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1C. Schematic illustrations of isolated intestinal
transplantation. Ao = abdominal aorta, CIA = common iliac artery, d = donor,
IVC = inferior vena cava, L = liver, r = recipient, S = spleen, ST = stomach,
SMA = superior mesenteric artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, TI =
temporary ileostomy, single arrow = duodenojejunal anastomosis, double arrows
= ileocolonic anastomosis, open arrowhead = superior mesenteric vein stump,
solid arrowhead = venous extension graft, black asterisk = intestinal graft,
white asterisk = residual recipient colon. Illustration shows intraoperative
appearance of recipient site after orthotopic intestinal transplantation.
End-to-side anastomosis of recipient infrarenal abdominal aorta to donor
superior mesenteric artery and donor superior mesenteric vein to recipient
superior mesenteric vein stump utilizing venous extension graft are
depicted.
|
|
If the pancreas is not to be used as a graft, the origin of the superior
mesenteric artery is excised. The splenic vein is transected next to the
venous confluence, and the portal vein is transected above the confluence of
the superior mesenteric and splenic veins. In cases of pancreas procurement,
the superior mesenteric vein is transected at the lower rim of the pancreas.
In the recipient, all adhesions from previous surgical procedures are
dissected and the infrarenal abdominal aorta and the venous confluence or
inferior vena cava are exposed.
In cases of orthotopic transplantation, the intestinal allograft is
revascularized in an end-to-side fashion to connect the donor superior
mesenteric artery to the recipient infrarenal abdominal aorta above the origin
of the inferior mesenteric artery and the donor superior mesenteric vein to
the recipient superior mesenteric vein or portal vein.
In cases of heterotopic transplantation, vascular continuity is restored in
an end-to-side fashion to connect the donor superior mesenteric artery to the
recipient infrarenal abdominal aorta below the origin of the inferior
mesenteric artery or common iliac artery and the donor superior mesenteric
vein to the recipient inferior vena cava or common iliac vein. Proximal
intestinal continuity is established between the most distal level of the
recipient upper gastrointestinal remnant and the donor jejunum, duodenum, or
stomach. A gastrojejunal anastomosis is usually performed in an end-to-side
fashion. The type of duodenojejunal or jejunojejunal anastomosis, either
end-to-end or side-to-side, is dictated by anatomic and surgical
considerations. The distal enteric anastomosis varies depending on the anatomy
of the recipient.
In patients with an intact terminal ileum, an ileoileal anastomosis can be
performed, which preserves the ileocecal valve. In patients with only parts of
the colon remaining, the donor ileum can be anastomosed to the residual
recipient colon. In every case, a temporary ileostomy is performed for direct
inspection of graft mucosa and for access of surveillance endoscopy and
biopsies; it is surgically closed 3-6 months after transplantation. For
patients with previous proctocolectomy, a terminal ileostomy is
performed.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 7A. Schematic illustrations of multivisceral transplantation. d =
donor, L = liver, P = pancreas, r = recipient, ST = stomach, TI = temporary
ileostomy, single black arrow = gastrogastric anastomosis, white arrows =
cavocaval anastomosis, double black arrows = ileocolonic anastomosis, open
arrowheads = aortic segment together with celiac trunk and superior mesenteric
artery, solid single arrowheads = inferior vena cava segment together with
hepatic veins, solid double arrowheads = aortoaortic anastomosis, black
asterisk = intestinal graft, white asterisk = residual recipient colon.
Illustration shows multivisceral graft on back-table after explantation.
|
|

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 7B. Schematic illustrations of multivisceral transplantation. d =
donor, L = liver, P = pancreas, r = recipient, ST = stomach, TI = temporary
ileostomy, single black arrow = gastrogastric anastomosis, white arrows =
cavocaval anastomosis, double black arrows = ileocolonic anastomosis, open
arrowheads = aortic segment together with celiac trunk and superior mesenteric
artery, solid single arrowheads = inferior vena cava segment together with
hepatic veins, solid double arrowheads = aortoaortic anastomosis, black
asterisk = intestinal graft, white asterisk = residual recipient colon.
Illustration shows intraoperative appearance of recipient site after
implantation.
|
|
Typical examples of regular anatomy are shown using CT, catheter
angiography, and gastrointestinal contrast studies (Figs.
2A,
2B,
2C,
2D,
2E,
2F,
3A,
3B,
3C,
3D,
4A,
4B,
5,
6).

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2A. MDCT scans obtained 14 months after heterotopic intestinal
transplantation in 3-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome. Ao = abdominal
aorta, d = donor, IMA = inferior mesenteric artery, IVC = inferior vena cava,
L = liver, r = recipient, S = spleen, ST = stomach, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, asterisks = intestinal graft lumen,
arrows = subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal
graft, arrowheads = donor lymph node. Images obtained with only oral contrast
material (A) and with oral and IV contrast material (B) show
normal wall, mucosal folds, and contrast enhancement of intestinal graft.
|
|

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2B. MDCT scans obtained 14 months after heterotopic intestinal
transplantation in 3-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome. Ao = abdominal
aorta, d = donor, IMA = inferior mesenteric artery, IVC = inferior vena cava,
L = liver, r = recipient, S = spleen, ST = stomach, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, asterisks = intestinal graft lumen,
arrows = subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal
graft, arrowheads = donor lymph node. Images obtained with only oral contrast
material (A) and with oral and IV contrast material (B) show
normal wall, mucosal folds, and contrast enhancement of intestinal graft.
|
|

View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2C. MDCT scans obtained 14 months after heterotopic intestinal
transplantation in 3-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome. Ao = abdominal
aorta, d = donor, IMA = inferior mesenteric artery, IVC = inferior vena cava,
L = liver, r = recipient, S = spleen, ST = stomach, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, asterisks = intestinal graft lumen,
arrows = subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal
graft, arrowheads = donor lymph node. Images obtained with oral and IV
contrast application at level of arterial anastomosis (C) and at level
of venous anastomosis (D) show donor superior mesenteric artery arising
from recipient infrarenal aorta and donor superior mesenteric vein draining in
recipient inferior vena cava.
|
|

View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2D. MDCT scans obtained 14 months after heterotopic intestinal
transplantation in 3-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome. Ao = abdominal
aorta, d = donor, IMA = inferior mesenteric artery, IVC = inferior vena cava,
L = liver, r = recipient, S = spleen, ST = stomach, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, asterisks = intestinal graft lumen,
arrows = subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal
graft, arrowheads = donor lymph node. Images obtained with oral and IV
contrast application at level of arterial anastomosis (C) and at level
of venous anastomosis (D) show donor superior mesenteric artery arising
from recipient infrarenal aorta and donor superior mesenteric vein draining in
recipient inferior vena cava.
|
|

View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2E. MDCT scans obtained 14 months after heterotopic intestinal
transplantation in 3-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome. Ao = abdominal
aorta, d = donor, IMA = inferior mesenteric artery, IVC = inferior vena cava,
L = liver, r = recipient, S = spleen, ST = stomach, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, asterisks = intestinal graft lumen.
Selective catheter angiogram obtained during dominant arterial phase shows
arterial anastomosis of donor superior mesenteric artery to recipient
infrarenal aorta.
|
|

View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2F. MDCT scans obtained 14 months after heterotopic intestinal
transplantation in 3-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome. Ao = abdominal
aorta, d = donor, IMA = inferior mesenteric artery, IVC = inferior vena cava,
L = liver, r = recipient, S = spleen, ST = stomach, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, asterisks = intestinal graft lumen.
Selective catheter angiogram obtained during dominant venous phase displays
venous anastomosis of donor superior mesenteric vein to recipient inferior
vena cava.
|
|

View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3A. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans of 39-year-old man with normal
graft function 14 months after orthotopic intestinal transplantation because
of short-bowel syndrome. Ao = abdominal aorta, d = donor, GB = gallbladder,
IVC = inferior vena cava, r = recipient, SV = splenic vein, ST = stomach, SMA
= superior mesenteric artery stump, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, black
asterisks = intestinal graft lumen, white asterisk = loculated fluid, arrows =
subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal graft, black
arrowheads = donor lymph node, white arrowheads = hyperdense staple line.
Images show donor superior mesenteric vein draining in recipient portal venous
confluence.
|
|

View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3B. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans of 39-year-old man with normal
graft function 14 months after orthotopic intestinal transplantation because
of short-bowel syndrome. Ao = abdominal aorta, d = donor, GB = gallbladder,
IVC = inferior vena cava, r = recipient, SV = splenic vein, ST = stomach, SMA
= superior mesenteric artery stump, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, black
asterisks = intestinal graft lumen, white asterisk = loculated fluid, arrows =
subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal graft, black
arrowheads = donor lymph node, white arrowheads = hyperdense staple line.
Images show donor superior mesenteric vein draining in recipient portal venous
confluence.
|
|

View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3C. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans of 39-year-old man with normal
graft function 14 months after orthotopic intestinal transplantation because
of short-bowel syndrome. Ao = abdominal aorta, d = donor, GB = gallbladder,
IVC = inferior vena cava, r = recipient, SV = splenic vein, ST = stomach, SMA
= superior mesenteric artery stump, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, black
asterisks = intestinal graft lumen, white asterisk = loculated fluid, arrows =
subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal graft, black
arrowheads = donor lymph node, white arrowheads = hyperdense staple line.
Images show donor superior mesenteric artery arising from recipient infrarenal
aorta.
|
|

View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3D. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans of 39-year-old man with normal
graft function 14 months after orthotopic intestinal transplantation because
of short-bowel syndrome. Ao = abdominal aorta, d = donor, GB = gallbladder,
IVC = inferior vena cava, r = recipient, SV = splenic vein, ST = stomach, SMA
= superior mesenteric artery stump, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, black
asterisks = intestinal graft lumen, white asterisk = loculated fluid, arrows =
subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal graft, black
arrowheads = donor lymph node, white arrowheads = hyperdense staple line.
Images show donor superior mesenteric artery arising from recipient infrarenal
aorta.
|
|

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 4A. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans obtained 4 months after
intestinal transplantation in 5-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome. Ao =
abdominal aorta, C = colon, CIA = common iliac artery, d = donor, D =
duodenum, I = ileum, IMA = inferior mesenteric artery, IVC = inferior vena
cava, J = jejunum, r = recipient, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, white
asterisks = intestinal graft lumen, black arrows = subsegmental arteries and
veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal graft, black arrowheads = donor lymph
node. Images show proximal intestinal end-to-end anastomosis (between
white arrowheads, A) between recipient duodenum and donor
jejunum (A) and distal intestinal end-to-end anastomosis (between
white arrows, B) marked by hyperdense staple line between
donor ileum and recipient ascending colon (B).
|
|

View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 4B. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans obtained 4 months after
intestinal transplantation in 5-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome. Ao =
abdominal aorta, C = colon, CIA = common iliac artery, d = donor, D =
duodenum, I = ileum, IMA = inferior mesenteric artery, IVC = inferior vena
cava, J = jejunum, r = recipient, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, white
asterisks = intestinal graft lumen, black arrows = subsegmental arteries and
veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal graft, black arrowheads = donor lymph
node. Images show proximal intestinal end-to-end anastomosis (between
white arrowheads, A) between recipient duodenum and donor
jejunum (A) and distal intestinal end-to-end anastomosis (between
white arrows, B) marked by hyperdense staple line between
donor ileum and recipient ascending colon (B).
|
|

View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 5. Upper gastrointestinal study with water-soluble contrast
material obtained 4 weeks after intestinal transplantation in 39-year-old man
with short-bowel syndrome. Image shows proximal intestinal side-to-end
anastomosis (between arrows) between recipient duodenum and donor
jejunum. d = donor, D = duodenum, J = jejunum, r = recipient, ST = stomach,
asterisk = recipient duodenal stump, between arrows = proximal intestinal
anastomosis, arrowheads = gastric tube.
|
|

View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 6. Retrograde intestinal enema study obtained 3 months after
intestinal transplantation in 59-year-old man with short-bowel syndrome shows
blocked Foley catheter (open arrowhead) within isolated donor
intestinal loop (asterisk) and distal intestinal end-to-side
anastomosis (between arrows) between donor ileum and recipient
rectum. d = donor, I = ileum, J = jejunum, r = recipient, R = rectum, solid
arrowhead = intestinal tube.
|
|
Multivisceral Transplantation
A multivisceral graft usually uses the liver, the pancreas, part of the
stomach, the duodenum, and the small bowel
[4,
5]. During explantation, the
various donor organs are mobilized en bloc without manipulation of the portal
venous system. If the stomach is used, the greater gastric curvature is
mobilized with preservation of the gastroepiploic arch; the short gastric
vessels are transected, and the greater omentum is resected. Cholecystectomy
and splenectomy are performed either in situ or ex situ on the back-table.
During procurement, the donor liver is typically removed together with the
inferior vena cava. For arterial revascularization, 10 cm of donor aorta is
excised above the celiac trunk and directly below the superior mesenteric
artery to preserve the origins of the renal arteries for further renal
transplantation.
The procured aorta is closed with sutures below the origin of the superior
mesenteric artery. This creates an aortic conduit with the celiac trunk and
superior mesenteric artery; the proximal part of the aortic conduit is
designated for aortoaortic anastomosis. Formerly, the combined origins of the
celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery were excised for arterial
revascularization. This technique was abandoned because it was more
technically demanding and unpredictable due to anastomotic scarring and
ensuing arterial stenosis.
Transection of the small bowel is performed in a way similar to that used
in intestinal transplantation except for dissection of venous and arterial
vessels. In the recipient, exenteration of the abdominal organs is performed;
this includes the liver together with or without the intrahepatic vena cava,
the pancreas, the spleen, part of the stomach, and the small bowel. The
infrarenal abdominal aorta is exposed. The arterial anastomosis is restored in
an end-to-side fashion to connect the large donor aortic conduit to the
recipient infrarenal abdominal aorta. The venous anastomosis is restored in an
end-to-end fashion to connect the suprahepatic and infrahepatic inferior vena
cava. Sometimes the piggyback technique is used as follows: In the recipient,
the liver is removed without the inferior vena cava; after implantation, the
infrahepatic portion of the vena cava of the graft is stapled resulting in a
caval stump. The donor suprahepatic vena cava is anastomosed in an end-to-side
fashion at the level of the hepatic veins or in a side-to-side fashion to the
recipient vena cava.
Proximal gastrointestinal reconstruction of the multivisceral graft is
performed by connecting the proximal portion of the recipient stomach to the
donor stomach. Distal intestinal continuity of the multivisceral graft is
established analogous to intestinal transplantation as described using one of
the various types of intestinointestinal anastomosis. Also, pyloroplasty is
performed to prevent gastric outlet obstruction resulting from denervation of
the stomach.
Typical examples of the regular anatomy are shown using various imaging
techniques after multivisceral transplantation in Figures
8A,
8B,
8C,
8D,
9A,
9B,
10.

View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 8A. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans obtained during dominant
arterial phase and 5 weeks after multivisceral transplantation in 61-year-old
man with liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and portomesenteric
thrombosis. Ao = abdominal aorta, AoC = aortic conduit, C = colon, CHA =
common hepatic artery, CTr = celiac trunk, d = donor, IVC = inferior vena
cava, LRV = left renal vein, L = liver, P = pancreas, PV = portal vein, r =
recipient, SA = splenic artery, ST = stomach, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, black asterisks = intestinal graft
lumen, arrow = subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal
graft, arrowhead = renal cyst. Images show normal anatomy at level of arterial
anastomosis (A), origin of celiac trunk (B), origin of superior
mesenteric artery (C), and bifurcation of celiac trunk (D).
|
|

View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 8B. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans obtained during dominant
arterial phase and 5 weeks after multivisceral transplantation in 61-year-old
man with liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and portomesenteric
thrombosis. Ao = abdominal aorta, AoC = aortic conduit, C = colon, CHA =
common hepatic artery, CTr = celiac trunk, d = donor, IVC = inferior vena
cava, LRV = left renal vein, L = liver, P = pancreas, PV = portal vein, r =
recipient, SA = splenic artery, ST = stomach, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, black asterisks = intestinal graft
lumen, arrow = subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal
graft, arrowhead = renal cyst. Images show normal anatomy at level of arterial
anastomosis (A), origin of celiac trunk (B), origin of superior
mesenteric artery (C), and bifurcation of celiac trunk (D).
|
|

View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 8C. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans obtained during dominant
arterial phase and 5 weeks after multivisceral transplantation in 61-year-old
man with liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and portomesenteric
thrombosis. Ao = abdominal aorta, AoC = aortic conduit, C = colon, CHA =
common hepatic artery, CTr = celiac trunk, d = donor, IVC = inferior vena
cava, LRV = left renal vein, L = liver, P = pancreas, PV = portal vein, r =
recipient, SA = splenic artery, ST = stomach, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, black asterisks = intestinal graft
lumen, arrow = subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal
graft, arrowhead = renal cyst. Images show normal anatomy at level of arterial
anastomosis (A), origin of celiac trunk (B), origin of superior
mesenteric artery (C), and bifurcation of celiac trunk (D).
|
|

View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 8D. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans obtained during dominant
arterial phase and 5 weeks after multivisceral transplantation in 61-year-old
man with liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and portomesenteric
thrombosis. Ao = abdominal aorta, AoC = aortic conduit, C = colon, CHA =
common hepatic artery, CTr = celiac trunk, d = donor, IVC = inferior vena
cava, LRV = left renal vein, L = liver, P = pancreas, PV = portal vein, r =
recipient, SA = splenic artery, ST = stomach, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, black asterisks = intestinal graft
lumen, arrow = subsegmental arteries and veins in mesenteric fat of intestinal
graft, arrowhead = renal cyst. Images show normal anatomy at level of arterial
anastomosis (A), origin of celiac trunk (B), origin of superior
mesenteric artery (C), and bifurcation of celiac trunk (D).
|
|

View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 9A. Contrast-enhanced helical CT scans obtained 7 days after
multivisceral transplantation with piggyback technique in 67-year-old man with
liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and portomesenteric thrombosis. Ao
= aorta, d = donor, L = liver, r = recipient, ST = stomach, white asterisk =
ascites, solid single arrow = donor inferior vena cava, open arrows = liver
vein, solid double arrows = recipient inferior vena cava with hyperdense
staple line, black arrowhead = gastric tube, solid arrowhead = subphrenic
drain, open arrowhead = staple line of donor caval stump. Images obtained at
level of hepatic veins show side-by-side location of donor and recipient
inferior vena cava (A) and stapled caval stump caudally (B).
|
|

View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 9B. Contrast-enhanced helical CT scans obtained 7 days after
multivisceral transplantation with piggyback technique in 67-year-old man with
liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and portomesenteric thrombosis. Ao
= aorta, d = donor, L = liver, r = recipient, ST = stomach, white asterisk =
ascites, solid single arrow = donor inferior vena cava, open arrows = liver
vein, solid double arrows = recipient inferior vena cava with hyperdense
staple line, black arrowhead = gastric tube, solid arrowhead = subphrenic
drain, open arrowhead = staple line of donor caval stump. Images obtained at
level of hepatic veins show side-by-side location of donor and recipient
inferior vena cava (A) and stapled caval stump caudally (B).
|
|

View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 10. Upper gastrointestinal study with water-soluble contrast
material obtained 5 years after multivisceral transplantation in 41-year-old
woman with Gardner's syndrome and intraabdominal desmoid tumor. Image shows
normal postoperative anatomy after end-to-end gastrogastrostomy with normal
intestinal contrast passage. Exact position of end-to-end gastrogastrostomy is
not discernible. d = donor, r = recipient, ST = stomach, asterisks =
intestinal graft, arrowheads = urethral drainage tube.
|
|
Liver-Intestinal Transplantation
A combined liver-intestinal graft uses at least the small bowel attached to
the liver. During the early period of liver-intestinal transplantation, only
the portal vein was left intact; the bile duct was transected and its distal
portion with the donor duodenum and pancreas was removed during back-table
preparation to avoid donor pancreatitis
[6]. This technique is not used
today because of surgical problems related to difficult preparation in
pediatric donors, bile leaks after biliary anastomosis, and the risk of
torsion of the portal vein.
Nowadays the liver and small bowel with the attached, intact, proximal
stapled duodenum and the adjacent rim of the pancreatic head are transplanted
en bloc. This modification simplifies graft preparation, eliminates dissection
of the bile duct within the hepatoduodenal ligament, omits biliary anastomotic
complications, and obviates vascular torsion
[13]. This technique also
enables procurement of a reduced and size-matched liver and intestinal graft
from donors who are larger than the recipient
[14]. For this reason, the
range of possible donors for children on the waiting list is extended.
Size reduction is achieved by resection of segments II and III or segments
II, III, and IV or extended right hemihepatectomy and, if necessary, by
resection of a distal segment of the ileum. In the recipient, the procedure
starts with hepatectomy and preserves the stomach, duodenum, and pancreas. The
residual native portal vein draining the remnant viscera is anastomosed to the
native suprarenal inferior vena cava in an end-to-side fashion (Figs.
11A,
11B). After implantation the
donor graft is revascularized analogous to multivisceral transplantation.
Proximal intestinal continuity is established between the remaining recipient
duodenum or jejunum and the donor proximal jejunum; distal intestinal
continuity is established analogous to intestinal transplantation as described
using one of the various types of intestinointestinal anastomosis.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 11A. Schematic illustrations of liver-intestinal transplantation.
CBD = common bile duct, CHA = common hepatic artery, CTr = celiac trunk, d =
donor, D = duodenum, IMV = inferior mesenteric vein, IVC = inferior vena cava,
LHV = left hepatic vein, LLHA = left lateral hepatic artery, LLHD = left
lateral hepatic duct, P = pancreas, PV = portal vein, r = recipient, S =
spleen, SA = splenic artery, SMA = superior mesenteric artery, SMV = superior
mesenteric vein, ST = stomach, SV = splenic vein, TI = temporary ileostomy,
single arrows = duodenoduodenal anastomosis, double arrows = ileocolonic
anastomosis, black arrowhead = hepatocaval anastomosis, white arrowhead =
portocaval anastomosis, black asterisk = intestinal graft, white asterisk =
residual recipient colon. Illustration of intraoperative appearance of
recipient site after removal of diseased liver in patient with short-bowel
syndrome shows end-to-side anastomosis between portal vein and inferior vena
cava.
|
|

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 11B. Schematic illustrations of liver-intestinal transplantation.
CBD = common bile duct, CHA = common hepatic artery, CTr = celiac trunk, d =
donor, D = duodenum, IMV = inferior mesenteric vein, IVC = inferior vena cava,
LHV = left hepatic vein, LLHA = left lateral hepatic artery, LLHD = left
lateral hepatic duct, P = pancreas, PV = portal vein, r = recipient, S =
spleen, SA = splenic artery, SMA = superior mesenteric artery, SMV = superior
mesenteric vein, ST = stomach, SV = splenic vein, TI = temporary ileostomy,
single arrows = duodenoduodenal anastomosis, double arrows = ileocolonic
anastomosis, black arrowhead = hepatocaval anastomosis, white arrowhead =
portocaval anastomosis, black asterisk = intestinal graft, white asterisk =
residual recipient colon. Illustration shows intraoperative appearance of
recipient site after implantation of size-reduced liver-intestinal graft using
extended right hemihepatectomy and distal segmental small-bowel resection.
|
|
Typical examples of regular anatomy are shown using sonography in Figures
12A,
12B.

View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 12A. High-resolution sonograms obtained 3 months after
liver-intestinal transplantation in 2-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome.
Ao = aorta, d = donor, L = liver, r = recipient, asterisk = intestinal graft.
Axial image displays side-to-end arterial anastomosis (between
arrowheads) between recipient abdominal aorta and donor aortic
conduit (arrows).
|
|

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 12B. High-resolution sonograms obtained 3 months after
liver-intestinal transplantation in 2-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome.
Ao = aorta, d = donor, L = liver, r = recipient, asterisk = intestinal graft.
Oblique image shows normal anatomy of portal vein (double arrows) and
hepatic artery (single arrow).
|
|
References
- Mazariegos GV, Kocoshis S. Patient selection for intestinal
transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant1998; 3:293
-297
- Cohen Z, Silverman RE, Wassef R, et al. Small intestinal
transplantation using cyclosporine: re port of a case.
Transplantation1986; 42:613
-621[Medline]
- Deltz E, Schroeder P, Gebhardt H, et al. Successful clinical small
bowel transplantation: report of a case. Clin
Transplant 1989;3:89
-91
- Starzl TE, Rowe MI, Todo S, et al. Transplantation of multiple
abdominal viscera. JAMA1989; 261:1449
-1457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Margreiter R, Konigsrainer A, Schmid T, et al. Successful
multivisceral transplantation. Trans plant Proc1992; 24:1226
-1227
- Grant D, Wall W, Mimeault R, et al. Successful small-bowel/liver
transplantation. Lancet1990; 335;181
-184[Medline]
- Furukawa H, Todo S, Reyes J, Abu-Elmagd K, Starzl TE. Technical
aspects of small bowel transplantation. Curr Opin Organ
Transplant 1998;3:279
-285
- Bach DB, Hurlbut JJ, Romano WM, et al. Human orthotopic small
intestine transplantation: radiologic assessment.
Radiology1991; 180:37
-41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bach DB, Levin MF, Vellet AD, et al. CT findings in patients with
small-bowel transplants. AJR1992; 159:311
-315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Campbell WL, Abu-Elmagd K, Federle MP, et al. Contrast examination
of the small bowel in patients with small-bowel transplants: findings in 16
patients. AJR1993; 161:969
-974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Campbell WL, Abu-Elmagd K, Furukawa H, Todo S. Intestinal and
multivisceral transplantation. Radiol Clin North Am1995; 33:595
-614[Medline]
- Gruessner RWG, Sharp HL. Living related intestinal transplantation:
first report of a standardized surgical technique.
Transplantation1997; 64:1605
-1607[Medline]
- Sudan DL, Iyer KR, Geroover A, et al. A new technique for combined
liver/small intestinal transplantation.
Transplantation2001; 72:11
-13[Medline]
- de Goyet JDV, Mitchell A, Mayer AD, et al. En bloc combined
reduced-liver and small bowel transplants: from large donors to small
children. Transplantation2000; 69:555
-559[Medline]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?