AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ballard, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ballard, E. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 183:1779-1781
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

MRI Appearance of Accessory Breast Tissue: A Diagnostic Consideration for an Axillary Mass in a Peripubertal or Pubertal Girl

Tal Laor1, Margaret H. Collins2, Kathleen H. Emery1, Lane F. Donnelly1, Kevin E. Bove2 and Edgar T. Ballard2

1 Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039.
2 Department of Pathology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.

Received January 9, 2004; accepted after revision March 16, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to T. Laor.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to describe the MRI appearance of accessory breast tissue that should be considered a diagnostic possibility in peripubertal or pubertal girls who present with an axillary mass along the course of the primitive milk streak.

CONCLUSION. The MRI appearance of accessory breast tissue is of a mass discontinuous with—but with signal intensity and contrast enhancement characteristics similar to—normal breast parenchyma.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Accessory breast tissue is residual tissue that persists from normal embryologic development, found in 2–6% of women [1]. During the fifth week of embryologic development, an ectodermal primitive milk streak forms along the ventral surface of the body extending from the axilla to the inguinal region [2]. From this streak, a mammary ridge develops in the thorax, although the remaining streak regresses. Further differentiation into complete breast parenchyma occurs during the remainder of gestation. Incomplete involution anywhere along the primitive milk streak can result in accessory or ectopic breast tissue. This tissue ranges from a small focus of parenchyma to complete structures that include a nipple and areola [3]. In a young child, the accessory tissue usually is not identified because the mass is small. During menarche, the mass may enlarge and become symptomatic, causing the child to seek medical attention. Symptoms generally increase in response to normal hormonal stimulation. In this article, we describe the MRI appearance of accessory breast tissue that presented as a palpable mass in the axilla of peripubertal or pubertal girls.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
We encountered several cases in which a palpable mass within the axilla of peripubertal or pubertal girls was evaluated using MRI and proven to be accessory breast tissue at surgery. As a result, we searched a computerized database (from 1971 to present) in the Department of Pathology for the diagnosis of accessory breast tissue. The radiology records from children with this diagnosis were examined to determine who had undergone MRI as part of the clinical evaluation for a palpable mass within the axilla. The MRI examinations were reviewed to evaluate the signal characteristics, the enhancement pattern, and the configuration of the palpable mass. Because the MRI examinations were performed over several years, the imaging sequences varied, but each study included a conventional spin-echo T1-weighted, a fast spin-echo T2-weighted, and a conventional fat-suppressed spin-echo T1-weighted sequence after IV contrast administration. Medical records and pathology slides from the children with MRI examinations also were reviewed. Institutional review board approval for this retrospective study was obtained. Informed consent was not required. Information was recorded in a secure, de-identified database.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Sixteen girls (age range, 9–17 years; mean age, 13.8 years) who underwent surgical excision and had a subsequent diagnosis of accessory breast tissue over a period of 32 years were identified. Between 1998 and 2003, four of these girls underwent MRI of a palpable mass in the axilla. Each of these girls presented with a mass that slowly enlarged over 1–1.5 years and was tender to palpation. Three masses were left-sided and one was right-sided. Two girls underwent sonographic evaluation initially for presumptive diagnoses of lymphatic malformation and lymphadenopathy (Fig. 1A). Three girls were treated with antibiotics for presumed infection (one for possible cat-scratch disease), but none improved.



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 15-year-old girl with axillary mass. Transverse sonogram of left axilla shows relatively well-defined mass composed of heterogeneous echotexture (arrow).

 

In all four girls, MRI at 1.5 T showed a poorly demarcated mass confined to the subcutaneous tissues of the axilla. The masses showed heterogeneous signal intensity composed of hyperintense and hypointense tissue on T1-weighted images (Fig. 2A). Fat-suppressed fast spin-echo T2-weighted images were characterized by moderately hyperintense parenchyma with interspersed regions of signal intensity consistent with fat (Fig. 3). The amount of fat signal within the mass compared with the adjacent breast was variable. All masses showed moderate enhancement after IV contrast administration on fat-suppressed T1-weighted images, similar to the ipsilateral breast parenchyma (Fig. 1B). Each mass was separate from normal breast tissue. One girl had normal-appearing lymph nodes in the ipsilateral axilla. After MRI, no definitive diagnosis was made because the appearance was considered nonspecific, and all girls subsequently underwent surgery.



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 12-year-old girl with axillary mass. Coronal T1-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 400/14) of right axilla shows poorly defined mass (arrow) of heterogeneous signal intensity. Inferior part of mass is hyperintense, consistent with fat.

 


View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 3,500/85) of left axilla in 16-year-old girl with her arm raised over her head shows superficial band-like mass of increased signal intensity (arrow) with interspersed suppressed fat signal.

 


View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 15-year-old girl with axillary mass. Axial fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 600/22) after IV contrast administration shows mild enhancement of left axillary mass (arrow). Signal intensity corresponding to fat is more abundant in mass than in ipsilateral breast. Note that mass is not contiguous with normal, enhancing breast tissue (asterisk).

 

Pathologic evaluation of the mass in three girls showed benign mammary tissue composed of lobules and ducts embedded in a fibrous stroma, admixed with mature adipose tissue (Fig. 2B). One specimen had no breast lobules and only a few ducts but abundant adipose and fibrous tissue.



View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 12-year-old girl with axillary mass. Photomicrograph of histology slide of mass shows lobules of breast tissue in center and adipose tissue in upper left corner of photograph. (200x)

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The differential diagnosis of an axillary mass in a peripubertal or pubertal girl includes a lipoma [4], lymphadenopathy or lymphadenitis, hidradenitis [5], sebaceous cyst, vascular malformation, and malignancy [6]. We have found that accessory breast tissue also may be a cause of an axillary mass in a peripubertal or pubertal girl and should be included in the differential diagnosis.

Accessory breast tissue can present as a mass anywhere along the course of the embryologic mammary streak but is most frequently found in the axilla [7]. The vulva is the next most common site for ectopic breast tissue [8]. The mass may be composed of glandular breast tissue, a nipple complex, or both [4, 6]. Accessory breast tissue also may be bilateral [9]. Accessory breast tissue responds to hormonal stimulation and may become more evident during menarche, pregnancy, or lactation. Discomfort, pain, milk secretion, and local skin irritation can occur [5].

Both benign and malignant diseases of breast tissue in ectopic locations in adult women have been described [5]. Various disorders associated with supernumerary nipples, including urogenital defects, vertebral abnormalities, pyloric stenosis, testicular carcinoma, and aberrant ventricular conduction [6, 8] have been reported. Screening for renal anomalies in patients with accessory breast tissue remains controversial [10]. The treatment of choice for symptomatic accessory axillary breast tissue is surgical excision [2, 5, 11]. Removal of the tissue will relieve physical discomfort and confirms the diagnosis [5].

Accessory breast tissue in the axilla resembles normal glandular parenchyma on mammography [9]. It is separate from the breast, unlike the axillary tail of Spence, which is a normal direct extension toward the axilla from the main breast tissue [9]. Although the imaging findings are not specific, sonography can show the increased echotexture of normal breast tissue [2, 12]. Cystic or adenomatous changes in the ectopic mass may also be evident on imaging [12].

MRI of soft-tissue masses is widely used in children. It can be used to delineate the extent of the lesion and monitor therapy. Although many lesions have characteristic appearances on MRI, many have features that are nonspecific and thus require tissue sampling for diagnosis. In our patients, the palpable masses were referred for MRI to define signal characteristics and extent of lesion. All the girls' MRI examinations showed signal characteristics similar to the adjacent, noncontiguous breast tissue, although the amount of interspersed fat was variable. The masses were poorly demarcated. IV contrast enhancement was heterogeneous, similar to breast parenchyma. The preoperative diagnosis of ectopic breast tissue was suggested by the imaging findings in two of the four girls who had undergone surgical excision. Although accessory axillary breast tissue is relatively uncommon as a clinical problem (in our series, less than one case per year), this possibility should be entertained when the imaging appearance, although nonspecific, resembles normal breast parenchyma. This may decrease the use of unnecessary antibiotics and alleviate anxiety until surgical management.

In conclusion, accessory breast tissue should be considered a diagnostic possibility in peripubertal or pubertal girls who present with an axillary mass along the course of the primitive milk streak. The MRI appearance is of a subcutaneous poorly demarcated mass discontinuous with—but having signal intensity and contrast enhancement characteristics similar to—normal breast tissue. Surgical resection for symptomatic relief is the treatment of choice.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Harris JR, Lippman, ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the breast, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:1 –14
  2. Jordan K, Laumann A, Conrad S, Medenica M. Axillary mass in a 20-year-old woman: diagnosis—axillary accessory breast tissue. Arch Dermatol2001; 137:1367 –1372[Free Full Text]
  3. Scanlan KA, Propeck PA. Accessory breast tissue in an unusual location. AJR1996; 166:339 –340[Free Full Text]
  4. De Cholnoky T. Accessory breast tissue in the axilla. N Y State J Med 1951;51:2245 –2248
  5. Lesavoy MA, Gomez-Garcia A, Nejdl R, Yospur G, Syiau TJ, Chang P. Axillary breast tissue: clinical presentation and surgical treatment. Ann Plast Surg1995; 35:356 –360[Medline]
  6. Silverberg MA, Rahman MZ. Axillary breast tissue mistaken for suppurative hidradenitis: an avoidable error. J Emerg Med 2003;25:51 –55[Medline]
  7. Bertschinger K, Caduff R, Kubik-Huch RA. Benign intramammary and axillary lesions mimicking malignancy. Eur Radiol2000; 10:1029 –1030[Medline]
  8. Garcia JJ, Verkauf BS, Hochberg CJ, Ingram JM. Aberrant breast tissue of the vulva: a case report and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol1978; 52:225 –228[Medline]
  9. Adler DD, Rebner M, Pennes DR. Accessory breast tissue in the axilla: mammographic appearance. Radiology1987; 163:709 –711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Velanovich V. Ectopic breast tissue, supernumerary breasts, and supernumerary nipples. South Med J1995; 88:903 –906[Medline]
  11. Kilic A, Kilic A, Emsen IM. Accessory axillary breast tissue. Ann Plast Surg2001; 46:657
  12. Yang WT, Suen M, Metreweli C. Mammographic, sonographic and histopathological correlation of benign axillary masses. Clin Radiol 1997;52:130 –135[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
O. M. Navarro, E. E. Laffan, and B.-Y. Ngan
Pediatric Soft-Tissue Tumors and Pseudo-tumors: MR Imaging Features with Pathologic Correlation: Part 1. Imaging Approach, Pseudotumors, Vascular Lesions, and Adipocytic Tumors
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 887 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ballard, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ballard, E. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS