AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, A.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, A.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 183:1799-1804
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Differentiation of Cavernous Hemangioma from Schwannoma of the Orbit: A Dynamic MRI Study

Atsuo Tanaka1, Futoshi Mihara1, Takashi Yoshiura1, Osamu Togao1, Yasuo Kuwabara1, Yoshihiro Natori2, Tomio Sasaki2 and Hiroshi Honda1

1 Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Received January 21, 2004; accepted after revision May 6, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to A. Tanaka (atsuo{at}radiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the capability of dynamic contrast MRI to differentiate hemangioma from schwannoma of the orbit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixteen patients (three males and 13 females; mean age, 39 ± 17.3 [SD] years; age range, 10–71 years) with unilateral orbital tumors, including eight cavernous hemangiomas and eight schwannomas, were examined. In addition to conventional MRI, we performed a dynamic contrast study (fast spin-echo sequence, 20-sec interval) after bolus administration of the contrast material (gadopentetate dimeglumine, 0.1 mmol/kg). We evaluated the features of the contrast enhancement spread pattern and the tumors' time–intensity curves.

RESULTS. In the early phase, all the hemangiomas started the enhancement from one point or portion, although all the schwannomas started the enhancement from a wide area. The difference in the contrast-enhancement spread pattern features between the two types of tumors was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The gradient of the time–intensity curve did not show a significant difference.

CONCLUSION. Hemangioma and schwannoma of the orbit can be differentiated by the contrast-enhancement spread pattern on dynamic MRI.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
 
The cavernous hemangioma is one of the most common primary orbital tumors. Differentiating cavernous hemangiomas from other orbital tumors, especially from schwannomas, can provide useful information when determining the appropriate surgical technique (for example, the management of adjacent structures, such as feeding vessels and nerves) [1]. However, differentiation based on conventional methods can be difficult [2]. We examined the enhancement pattern and time–intensity curves of dynamic MRI and then evaluated their ability to differentiate hemangiomas from schwannomas of the orbit.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
 
Eight schwannomas and eight cavernous hemangiomas, all pathologically proven, were examined retrospectively in three males and 13 females (mean age, 39 ± 17.3 [SD] years; age range, 10–71 years). The MR scanners used were 1.5-T scanners (Magnetom Vision, Siemens or Signa, GE Healthcare). A conventional T1-weighted image and a T2-weighted image were obtained by fast spin-echo sequence for each tumor. Fast spin-echo dynamic MRI (TR/TE range, 300/12–19; number of exitations, 1; matrix, 256 x 192–256) was performed for 2 min at 20-sec intervals immediately after the injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg, Magnevist, Berlex). Delayed imaging was performed 5–18 min after the dynamic MRI study. In some cases, unenhanced CT scans also were obtained (Figs. 1A and 2A). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Kyushu University Hospital.



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 49-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Conventional images show homogeneous density and signal intensity on unenhanced CT scan (A) and T1-weighted (B) and T2-weighted (C) fast spin-echo images.

 


View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 71-year-old man with schwannoma. Conventional images show homogeneous density and signal intensity on unenhanced CT scan (A) and T1-weighted (B) and T2-weighted (C) fast spin-echo images.

 

The spread pattern of the contrast enhancement was assessed and divided into two groups: one starting from a small point or portion and the other starting from a wide area (Fig. 1A). An oval region of interest was situated to cover the entire area of the tumor, and a time–intensity curve was obtained. Changes in signal intensity during the first 20 sec on the time–intensity curve were used to define the dynamic enhancement gradient: We labeled an increase of signal intensity greater than 40% as rapid and any increase smaller than 40% as gradual (Fig. 1B). The statistical analysis of chisquare test results was performed using SAS software (SAS Institute). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.



View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 49-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Conventional images show homogeneous density and signal intensity on unenhanced CT scan (A) and T1-weighted (B) and T2-weighted (C) fast spin-echo images.

 


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
 
All the orbital tumors showed hyperintensity on T2-weighted images and isointensity on T1-weighted images compared with extraocular muscles. All the hemangiomas showed homogeneous signal intensity both on T1- and T2-weighted images. Seven schwannomas showed homogeneous signal intensity on T1-weighted images, and three schwannomas showed homogeneous signal intensity on T2-weighted images (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C and 2A, 2B, 2C).



View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 49-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Conventional images show homogeneous density and signal intensity on unenhanced CT scan (A) and T1-weighted (B) and T2-weighted (C) fast spin-echo images.

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 71-year-old man with schwannoma. Conventional images show homogeneous density and signal intensity on unenhanced CT scan (A) and T1-weighted (B) and T2-weighted (C) fast spin-echo images.

 


View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. 71-year-old man with schwannoma. Conventional images show homogeneous density and signal intensity on unenhanced CT scan (A) and T1-weighted (B) and T2-weighted (C) fast spin-echo images.

 

At the early phase, all the hemangiomas started enhancement from one point or portion (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F, 3G, 3H); however, this enhancement pattern was not observed in schwannomas. All the schwannomas started the enhancement from a wide area (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 4F, 4G, 4H). The difference in the contrast-enhancement spread pattern for the two types of tumors was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). In the analysis of the time–intensity curves, all eight hemangiomas showed delayed enhancement. Four schwannomas showed rapid enhancement, and four schwannomas showed a gradual enhancement pattern. The difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).



View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 61-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 0 and 20 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from one central point of tumor.

 


View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 61-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 0 and 20 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from one central point of tumor.

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. 61-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, and 300 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from one central point of tumor.

 


View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D. 61-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, and 300 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from one central point of tumor.

 


View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3E. 61-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, and 300 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from one central point of tumor.

 


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3F. 61-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, and 300 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from one central point of tumor.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3G. 61-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, and 300 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from one central point of tumor.

 


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3H. 61-year-old woman with cavernous hemangioma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, and 300 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from one central point of tumor.

 


View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 25-year-old man with schwannoma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from marginal wide area of tumor.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 25-year-old man with schwannoma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from marginal wide area of tumor.

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. 25-year-old man with schwannoma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from marginal wide area of tumor.

 


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D. 25-year-old man with schwannoma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from marginal wide area of tumor.

 


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4E. 25-year-old man with schwannoma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from marginal wide area of tumor.

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4F. 25-year-old man with schwannoma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from marginal wide area of tumor.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4G. 25-year-old man with schwannoma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 120 and 300 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from marginal wide area of tumor.

 


View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4H. 25-year-old man with schwannoma. Dynamic MR images obtained at 120 and 300 sec, respectively, after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement starts from marginal wide area of tumor.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
 
The cavernous hemangioma is one of the most common primary orbital tumors. This tumor occurs in females more frequently than in males and has its peak incidence in early middle age [3], and it may enlarge during pregnancy [4]. Painless and progressive reducible unilateral proptosis causing a variable degree of hyperopia is the usual clinical presentation [5, 6], and amaurosis fugax can occur [7]. Multiple cavernous hemangiomas are rare but can occur simultaneously or be separated by long intervals [3, 8]. Schwannomas are encapsulated and usually have a slow-growing and noninvasive character. They also can cause exophthalmos, optic neuropathy, and diplopia, like cavernous hemangiomas [9, 10]. It is difficult to differentiate these conditions clinically.

He et al. [11] reported the histopathologic classification and distribution of orbital diseases in 3,476 patients. They reported that the 10 leading diseases were cavernous hemangioma, leiomyoma, inflammatory pseudotumor, dermoid, schwannoma, meningioma, benign mixed tumor of the lacrimal gland, mucocele, varix, and lacrimal gland epithelial tumor. Except for the cavernous hemangioma and schwannoma, all the other tumors have distinct characteristic features and usually can be identified using conventional MRI.

With respect to surgical management, differentiating those two tumors is not crucial, but such differentiation could provide useful information for better results, especially vessel management. Moreover, it would be beneficial to treat these tumors without biopsy or surgical treatment, such as radiotherapy.

The usefulness of MRI of orbital mass lesions is well known [2, 1219]. MRI shows hemangiomas to be well-defined masses that usually are oval [2]. The signal intensity and homogeneity of the hemangioma are usually characteristic on conventional MRI [1419]. Thorn-Kany et al. [20] reported that an intraconal, well-defined, associated homogeneous signal; isointensity relative to muscle on T1-weighted images; hyperintensity on T2-weighted images; and progressive filling on gadopentetate dimeglumine enhancement are typical findings of a cavernous hemangioma. Our study revealed, however, that these features also can be observed in schwannomas and are not very useful in differentiating these two tumors.

Our results suggest that the contrast-enhancement spread pattern can be used to distinguish these tumors. Ohtsuka et al. [21] reported the enhancement pattern of two hemangiomas. On early MRI after the gadopentetate dimeglumine injection, one small point of enhancement initially was noted and then the tumor was enhanced homogeneously. Our results from hemangioma enhancement are similar to theirs. The initial enhancement point appearing in the hemangioma would represent the entry of the feeding vessels [21]. On the other hand, the enhancement pattern of schwannomas is clearly different from that of hemangiomas, and this feature may help to distinguish these two tumors. The gradient of the time–intensity curve did not show a significant difference.

Sonography is a good technique for this purpose [22], but weaknesses may include subjective differences among reviewers; previous knowledge of some artifacts [22, 23]; and difficulty making decisions in cases of multiple, treated, or smaller tumors.

We also have a few results of a dynamic CT study (not published), which look almost identical to this dynamic MRI study. A drawback is that CT study requires somewhat heavy and repeated radiographic exposure of the orbit.


Conclusion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
 
We believe that schwannomas and cavernous hemangiomas of the orbit can be distinguished by the contrast-enhancement spread pattern, and not by the enhancement gradient on dynamic MRI.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
 

  1. Missori P, Tarantino R, Delfini R, Lunardi P, Cantore G. Surgical management of orbital cavernous angiomas: prognosis for visual function after removal. Neurosurgery1994; 35:34 –38[Medline]
  2. Bilaniuk L. Orbital vascular lesions: role of imaging. Radiol Clin North Am1999; 37:169 –183[Medline]
  3. Harris GJ, Jakobiec FA. Cavernous hemangioma of the orbit. J Neurosurg1979; 51:219 –228[Medline]
  4. Dinakar I, Naik RT, Purohit AK, Ratnakar KS. Cavernous hemangioma of the orbit: a case report. Indian J Pathol Microbiol1993; 36:318 –321[Medline]
  5. Ruchman MC, Flanagan J. Cavernous hemangiomas of the orbit. Ophthalmology1983; 90:1328 –1336[Medline]
  6. D'Hermies F, Elmaleh C, Mourier K, et al. Cavernous hemangioma of the orbit [in French]. J Fr Ophtalmol1993; 16:195 –198[Medline]
  7. Brown GC, Shields JA. Amaurosis fugax secondary to presumed cavernous hemangioma of the orbit. Ann Ophthalmol1981; 13:1205 –1209[Medline]
  8. Wolin MJ, Holds JB, Anderson RL, Mamalis N. Multiple orbital tumors were cavernous hemangiomas. Ann Ophthalmol1990; 22:426 –428[Medline]
  9. Dervin JE, Beaconsfield M, Wright JE, Moseley IF. CT findings in orbital tumours of nerve sheath origin. Clin Radiol1989; 40:475 –479[Medline]
  10. Carroll GS, Haik BG, Fleming JC, Weiss RA, Mafee MF. Peripheral nerve tumors of the orbit. Radiol Clin North Am1999; 37:195 –202[Medline]
  11. He Y, Song G, Ding Y. Histopathologic classification of 3476 orbital disease. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi2002; 38:396 –398[Medline]
  12. Mihara F, Gupta KL, Murayama S, Lee N, Haik BG. MR imaging of orbital mass lesions with contrast agent: a preliminary report. Comput Med Imaging Graph1991; 15:445 –449[Medline]
  13. Mihara F, Gupta KL, Murayama S, Lee N, Bond JB, Haik BG. MR imaging of malignant uveal melanoma: role of pulse sequence and contrast agent. AJNR 1991;12:991 –996[Abstract]
  14. Mafee MF, Miller MT, Tan W, Dobben GD. Dynamic computed tomography and its application to ophthalmology. Radiol Clin North Am 1987;25;715 –731[Medline]
  15. Forbes GS, Earnest F 4th, Waller RR. Computed tomography of orbital tumors, including late-generation scanning technique. Radiology1982; 142:387 –394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Savoiardo M, Strada L, Passerini A. Cavernous hemangiomas of the orbit: value of CT, angiography, and phlebography. AJNR 1983;4:741 –744[Abstract]
  17. Mafee MF, Putterman A, Valvassori GE, Campos M, Capek V. Orbital space-occupying lesions: role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: an analysis of 145 cases. Radiol Clin North Am 1987;25:529 –559[Medline]
  18. Azar-Kia B, Naheedy MH, Elias DA, Mafee MF, Fine M. Optic nerve tumors: role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am1987; 25:561 –581[Medline]
  19. Abe T, Kawamura N, Homma H, Sasaki K, Izumiyama H, Matsumoto K. MRI of orbital schwannomas. Neuroradiology2000; 42:466 –468[Medline]
  20. Thorn-Kany M, Arrue P, Delisle MB, Lacroix F, Lagarrigue J, Manelfe C. Cavernous hemangiomas of the orbit: MR imaging. J Neuroradiol 1999;26:79 –86[Medline]
  21. Ohtsuka K, Hashimoto M, Akiba H. Serial dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of orbital cavernous hemangioma. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;123:396 –398[Medline]
  22. Dallow RL. Ultrasonography of the orbit. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1986;26:51 –76[Medline]
  23. Ustymowicz A, Krejza J, Mariak Z. Twinkling artifact in color Doppler imaging of the orbit. J Ultrasound Med2002; 21:559 –563[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, A.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, A.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS