AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giorgio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ferraioli, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giorgio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ferraioli, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 184:207-211
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Complications After Percutaneous Saline-Enhanced Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors: 3-Year Experience with 336 Patients at a Single Center

Antonio Giorgio1, Luciano Tarantino1, Giorgio de Stefano1, Carmine Coppola1 and Giovanna Ferraioli1

1 All authors: Interventional Ultrasound Service, "D. Cotugno" Hospital, Via Quagliariello 54, Naples, 80131, Italy.

Received March 15, 2004; accepted after revision May 6, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to G. Ferraioli, Viale Marconi, 41, Cava dei Tirreni (SA), 84013 Italy (ferraiol{at}tin.it).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to report the complications that occurred in a large series of patients with primary or metastatic liver tumors treated with percutaneous saline-enhanced radiofrequency ablation under sonographic guidance at a single center during 3 years of experience.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Between September 2000 and October 2003, 336 consecutive patients (221 men and 115 women; age range, 44–78 years; mean, 67 years) with 407 malignant liver tumors were treated at our institution using radiofrequency ablation. Of these patients, 287 had hepatocellular carcinoma from cirrhosis, 47 had liver metastases (38 from colon, six from breast, two from lung, and one from cutaneous melanoma), and two had primary cholangiocarcinoma. Adverse events related to radiofrequency ablation were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS. The number of sessions performed was 375 (39 patients had two sessions). The number of patients with major complications, including death, was three (0.9%). The overall mortality rate was 0.3% (1/336). One patient died because of worsening liver decompensation. Two other major complications occurred. In one patient (0.3%), liver abscess and sepsis developed and were successfully treated with percutaneous sonography-guided needle (18-gauge) aspiration and IV antibiotics. Mild posttreatment ascites occurred in one patient (0.3%). One patient showed self-limiting subcutaneous cellulitis along the electrode-needle path that healed in 2 weeks. Fever lasting 1–3 days and pain lasting 12–24 hr were observed in 141 patients (42%) and 211 patients (63%), respectively. So far, no cutaneous or abdominal wall seeding has been observed clinically or sonographically.

CONCLUSION. Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors can be considered safe. Life-threatening acute liver failure can be considered a rare possible complication.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Radiofrequency ablation is considered a safe and effective treatment for small hepatocellular carcinomas and metastatic liver tumors [14]. This imaging-guided therapy is a valid alternative to percutaneous ethanol injection [57] and is increasingly used to treat hepatocellular carcinomas in patients in whom surgery is contraindicated [810].

The electrode needles that have been used for local tumor ablation are single or clustered cooled-tip needles and expandable-array needles. Both types of electrode needles have been in use for more than 8 years [2, 1115].

A more recently introduced system uses a cannulated needle electrode with multiple side holes connected to a pump filled with saline solution [1619]. The targeted lesion is coagulated with a high-frequency AC produced by a radiofrequency generator. During exposure of the lesion to the radiofrequency current, saline solution can be injected into the tumor through the needle electrode, perfusing the neoplastic tissue around the needle tip. This action increases the electric conductivity of the radiofrequency fields in the targeted tissue and prevents tissue vaporization and charring, thus increasing the volume of coagulation necrosis.

The rates of and potential risk factors for complications after radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors using cooled-tip needles or expandable-array electrode needles have been reported for large series of treated patients [8, 2023]. In contrast, the adverse effects of the saline-perfused cannulated electrode needle have been described only for small series [18].

So far, the saline-perfused cannulated electrode needle has been shown to be safe and has been associated with fewer cases of adverse events than have the older electrode needles [18, 19].

We report the complications that occurred in a large series of patients with primary or metastatic liver tumors treated with saline-enhanced radiofrequency under sonographic guidance at a single center during 3 years of experience.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Subjects
Between September 2000 and October 2003, 336 consecutive patients (221 men and 115 women; age range, 44–78 years; mean, 67 years) having 407 malignant liver tumors were treated at our institution with a newly available method of radio-frequency ablation called high-frequency thermotherapy. Of these patients, 287 had hepato-cellular carcinoma from cirrhosis, 47 had liver metastases (38 from colon, six from breast, two from lung, and one from cutaneous melanoma), and two had primary cholangiocarcinoma. None had undergone prior biliary interventions. According to the Child-Pugh classification, of the 287 cirrhotic patients, 210 were in class A and 77 in class B. Tumor sizes ranged from 1.5 to 8.5 cm for hepatocellular carcinoma and from 1.0 to 6.5 cm for metastatic lesions. The tumors were in the right lobe of the liver in 239 patients, in the left lobe in 60, and in both lobes in 37. Sixty-eight (17%) of 407 tumors were superficially located under the liver capsule (45 in the right lobe and 23 in the left lobe). Nineteen tumors were adjacent to the gallbladder.

All patients either were not eligible for or refused surgery. Serum blood tests for liver function and hemocoagulation were performed. ECG and chest radiography were also performed.

The patients to be treated with radiofrequency ablation were selected according to the following criteria: presence of a single tumor or, in the case of multiple tumors, not more than three tumors; international normalized ratio less than or equal to 1.5; platelet count greater than or equal to 60,000/mm3; absence of ascites; absence of portal vein thrombosis; absence of extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma metastases; and liver function impairment no more severe than Child-Pugh class B-9.

In our series of patients, international normalized ratios ranged from 0.8 to 1.5 and platelet count ranged from 385,000/mm3 to 60,000/mm3.

Fifty-seven patients with tumors deep in the right lobe of the liver were treated after local anesthesia with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine (Xylocaina, AstraZeneca), given subcutaneously. Two hundred seventy-nine patients were treated while deeply sedated through premedication with atropine (Atropina Solfato, Sifra), 0.5 mg IV, and induction with propofol (Diprivan, AstraZeneca), 9–12 mg/kg/hr, and fentanyl (Fentanest, Pharmacia and Upjohn), 50 µg IV. The reasons for sedation included subcapsular tumors (68 patients), large tumors (> 4.0 cm) needing multiple needle insertions and therefore long exposure to thermoablation (91 patients), and refusal of patients to remain awake during percutaneous treatment (120 patients).

All patients were treated with a new generation of radiofrequency equipment (Elektrotom 106 HiTT, Berchtold) using 15-gauge needle electrodes with an exposed active tip 2.5 cm long, having eight side holes and no terminal hole.

All treatments were performed under sonographic guidance following the procedure previously described [10]. Briefly, under sonographic guidance, the needle electrode was inserted into the tumor, and then the current generator and the pump for the saline (0.9% concentration) injection were activated for 10–15 min. At the end of each insertion, the current generator was switched off only after the needle electrode had been retrieved to heat the needle path and prevent seeding of tumoral cells. A single insertion was planned for tumors with diameters up to 4.0 cm. For larger tumors, multiple needle insertions were planned. Lesions with diameters larger than 5 cm were treated in two sessions. The second session always took place within 2 weeks of the first session. A sonographic examination and a blood test were performed 24 hr after the treatment; afterward, the patients were discharged from the hospital. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by triphasic contrast-enhanced CT 4 weeks after the treatment. All patients were followed up for at least 4 months. For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, abdominal sonography and serum {alpha}-fetoprotein testing took place every 2 months and CT or MRI every year, or earlier when indicated. Patients with liver metastases were followed up by sonography and blood testing every 2 months and helical CT or MRI every 6 months.

The treatment was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients before the procedure.

Complications
Adverse events related to radiofrequency ablation were prospectively recorded. The definitions of the Society for Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology were used to classify major and minor complications [24]. Occurrences of events threatening the patient's life, leading to substantial morbidity and disability, or requiring prolonged hospitalization were considered major complications (i.e., hemoperitoneum, pleural effusion, portal vein thrombosis, decompensation of liver cirrhosis, renal insufficiency, marked jaundice, abscess, or death). All other complications were considered minor.

Patients were monitored for pain and fever for 7 days after the procedure. They were instructed to call the service should pain or fever appear.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
For the 336 patients, 407 malignant liver tumors were treated and 375 sessions were performed (39 patients had two sessions). The number of sessions and the number of electrode insertions for the radiofrequency ablation treatment are reported in Tables 1 and 2. The number of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules treated in a single session totaled 286, with a single electrode insertion for 249, two insertions for 28, and three insertions for nine. Thirty-four tumors were treated in two sessions (three electrode insertions per session). The number of liver metastases treated in a single session totaled 82, with a single electrode insertion for 67, two insertions for eight, three insertions for five, and four insertions for two. Five tumors were treated in two sessions (four electrode insertions per session).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Number and Size of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors, Number of Radiofrequency Sessions, and Number of Electrode Insertions per Session

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Number and Size of Metastatic Liver Tumors, Number of Radiofrequency Sessions, and Number of Electrode Insertions per Session

 

No complications occurred after local or general anesthesia. All patients were discharged from the hospital the day after the procedure.

One (0.3%) of 336 patients died. He was a 68-year-old Child B cirrhotic patient with a single 2.0-cm-diameter nodule of hepato-cellular carcinoma in segment VIII, which was treated with a single electrode insertion. The patient showed decompensation of liver cirrhosis 1 week after the radiofrequency ablation. He presented with progressively worsening jaundice (bilirubin level = 52 mg/dL), ascites, and severe hemocoagulation impairment and died 38 days after treatment. Two other major complications (0.6%) were reported. The number of major complications, including deaths, was three (0.9%). The overall mortality rate was 0.3% (1/336).

In one patient with a 3.5-cm-diameter hepato-cellular carcinoma nodule in segment VI, a liver abscess developed from Escherichia coli and sepsis 8 days after the procedure. He was treated with percutaneous sonography-guided needle (18-gauge) aspiration (Fig. 1) and IV antibiotic therapy. Fever and leukocytosis disappeared after 2 weeks. Helical CT performed 1 month later showed complete necrosis of the tumor. Mild posttreatment ascites was observed in one patient 24 hr after radiofrequency ablation. Diagnostic paracentesis yielded a yellow ascitic fluid; a blood test for RBC showed no change. Ascites was treated by diuretic administration and resolved in 3 days. In one patient with a single 2.0-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma nodule in segment III, self-limiting subcutaneous cellulitis was seen along the electrode-needle path 1 week after the procedure and healed in 2 weeks with antibiotic treatment. Fever lasting 1–3 days and pain lasting 12–24 hr after treatment were observed in 141 patients (42%) and 211 patients (63%), respectively. Pain medication (30 mg of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine, Toradol, Recordati) was necessary for 44 (21%) of 211 patients. So far, no cutaneous or abdominal wall seeding has been observed clinically, sonographically, or by helical CT during the follow-up.



View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. 72-year-old man with liver abscess after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Transverse sonogram shows anechoic lesion with dependent internal echoes on anterior portion of liver segment VI. Needle tip (arrow) is being introduced into lesion to perform sonographically guided drainage.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Local percutaneous ablation of liver malignancies has gained wide acceptance as a safe alternative to hepatic resection. Radiofrequency ablation is performed percutaneously for the treatment of hepatic metastases in patients deemed ineligible for hepatic tumor resection, which is unquestionably the modality of choice when disease is limited to the liver [4, 8] or when used as part of a test-of-time management approach—that is, delayed resection of liver metastases to allow additional metastases that may be present but undetected to be identified [25]. In properly selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, percutaneous ablation achieves a relatively high rate of complete response similar to that of liver transplantation or hepatic resection [26]. Following the guidelines of the European Association for the Study of the Liver, ethanol injection should be considered the standard percutaneous technique, and other percutaneous ablation techniques should be compared with ethanol injection when they are being assessed not only for initial tumor response but also for long-term survival and costs [26].

Two studies have concluded that, among tumor ablation techniques, radiofrequency ablation may be the superior alternative to percutaneous ethanol injection because of a higher rate of complete necrosis and fewer treatment sessions [5, 6]. However, the complication rate is higher with radiofrequency ablation than with percutaneous ethanol injection [6].

In a multicenter study that enrolled 2,320 patients who were treated with an internally cooled radiofrequency ablation technique, Livraghi et al. [21] noted six deaths (0.3%). These were due to multiorgan failure after intestinal perforation, septic shock, massive hemorrhage after tumor rupture, or liver failure after stenosis of the right bile duct, and one death was sudden and of unknown cause. Moreover, 50 instances (2.2%) of additional major complications were encountered. The most frequent of these were peritoneal hemorrhage, neoplastic seeding, intrahepatic abscesses, and intestinal perforation. In our series, the mortality rate was similar to that of Livraghi et al. The death was related to decompensation of liver cirrhosis in a patient with a small hepatocellular carcinoma. Fewer other major complications than in Livraghi's series were observed (0.6%), and they consisted of one case of liver abscess and one case of mild ascites that was due to liver decompensation. Moreover, no cases of hemoperitoneum or hemothorax were observed. The series of Livraghi et al. consisted of patients treated in different institutions by operators with a different expertise in performing radiofrequency ablation, mainly because the number of patients they had treated was quite different.

Our center has more than 20 years' experience with percutaneous ablation therapies for focal liver lesions [27]. Therefore, the lower rate of major complications we observed may be related to factors other than the radiofrequency generator and the electrode system we used. Zagoria et al. [28], in a series of 38 patients with liver metastases, reported one death related to a hepatic abscess that developed 8 days after the radiofrequency ablation procedure.

In a series of de Baère et al. [20] on 312 patients, five deaths (1.6%) and 37 other major complications (12%) were related to radiofrequency treatment. The deaths were caused by liver insufficiency, colon perforation, or portal vein thrombosis. The higher rate of complications in that series may be due to its lack of homogeneity, since the treatments included percutaneous and intraoperative radiofrequency ablation, cooled needles, and expandable arrays. In the recent series of Buscarini and Buscarini [29] on 166 patients treated by a percutaneous radiofrequency expandable system, no deaths occurred, but the rate of major complications was higher (4.6%) and included one case of peritoneal hemorrhage and one case of cutaneous seeding. The absence of deaths could be explained by the number of patients enrolled—fewer than is required to have one expected death, as noted in our study and in that of Livraghi et al. [21] (one death every 300 patients).

Interestingly, during follow-up we did not observe any cases of seeding, in contrast to the findings of others [18, 19, 29], especially Llovet et al. [30]. They reported a high rate of seeding (12%), mostly in cases of superficial lesions, after treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with internally cooled needles.

Our results showed that radiofrequency ablation using the perfused needle electrode is a safe and reliable treatment for liver malignancies, with fewer major complications than occur with internally cooled or expandable needle electrodes. However, a sudden worsening of functional liver reserve may occur with radiofrequency ablation therapy even when only a small nodule of hepatocellular carcinoma is treated. In addition, our study confirmed previous reports [20] that the complication of liver abscess may occur after radiofrequency ablation of tumors near the intestine, probably because of contamination of the area of radiofrequency-induced necrosis by pathogens from the digestive tract. In contrast, none of the 19 patients in our series who had tumors adjacent to the gallbladder experienced the major complications that were described by other authors [31]. The results of our study confirmed the report of Chopra et al. [32] that radiofrequency ablation of lesions in the gallbladder fossa is safe.

In conclusion, saline-enhanced radiofrequency of liver tumors can be considered safe. Unfortunately, liver decompensation that may rapidly worsen and lead to life-threatening acute liver failure must be considered a possible, although rare, complication.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Gazelle GS, Goldberg SN, Solbiati L, Livraghi T. Tumor ablation with radio-frequency energy. Radiology2000; 217:633 -646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. McGahan JP, Dodd GD III. Radiofrequency ablation of the liver: current status. AJR2001; 176:3 -16[Free Full Text]
  3. Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: radio-frequency ablation of medium and large lesions. Radiology2000; 214:761 -768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. de Baère T, Elias D, Dromain C, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of 100 hepatic metastases with a mean follow-up of more than 1 year. AJR 2000;175:1619 -1625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology2003; 228:235 -240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F, Solbiati L, Gazelle GS. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with radio-frequency ablation versus ethanol injection. Radiology1999; 210:655 -661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Poon RT, Fan ST, Tsang FH, Wong J. Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical review from the surgeon's perspective. Ann Surg 2002;235:466 -486[Medline]
  8. Wood TF, Rose DM, Chung M, Allegra DP, Foshag LJ, Bilchik AJ. Radiofrequency ablation of 231 unresectable hepatic tumors: indications, limitations, and complications. Ann Surg Oncol2000; 7:593 -600[Medline]
  9. Lam CM, Ng KK, Poon RT, Ai V, Yuen J, Fan ST. Impact of radiofrequency ablation on the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a specialized centre. Br J Surg2004; 91:334 -338[Medline]
  10. Livraghi T, Meloni F, Morabito A, Vettori C. Multimodal image-guided tailored therapy of early and intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma: longterm survival in the experience of a single radiologic referral center. Liver Transpl2004; 10 [suppl]:S98 -S106[Medline]
  11. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Rittman WJ, Mueller PR, Rosenthal DI. Radiofrequency tissue ablation: importance of local temperature along the electrode tip exposure in determining lesion shape and size. Acad Radiol1996; 3:212 -218[Medline]
  12. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Dawson SL, Rittman WJ, Mueller PR, Rosenthal DI. Tissue ablation with radiofrequency using multiprobe arrays. Acad Radiol1995; 2:670 -674[Medline]
  13. Lorentzen T, Christensen NE, Nolsle CP, Torp-Pedersen ST. Radiofrequency tissue ablation with a cooled needle in vitro: ultrasonography, dose response, and lesion temperature. Acad Radiol1997; 4:292 -297[Medline]
  14. Goldberg SN, Solbiati L, Hahn PF, et al. Large-volume tissue ablation with radio-frequency by using a clustered, internally cooled electrode technique: laboratory and clinical experience in liver metastases. Radiology 1998;209 : 371-379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Rossi S, Buscarini E, Garbagnati F, et al. Percutaneous treatment of small hepatic tumors by an expandable RF needle electrode. AJR 1998;170:1015 -1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Monti F, et al. Saline-enhanced radio-frequency tissue ablation in the treatment of liver metastases. Radiology 1997;202 : 205-210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Miao Y, Ni Y, Yu J, Marchal G. A comparative study on validation of a novel cooled-wet electrode for radiofrequency liver ablation. Invest Radiol2000; 35:438 -444[Medline]
  18. Kettenbach J, Köstler W, Rücklinger E, et al. Percutaneous saline-enhanced radiofrequency ablation of unresectable hepatic tumors: initial experience in 26 patients. AJR2003; 180:1537 -1545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Giorgio A, Tarantino L, de Stefano G, et al. Percutaneous sonographically guided saline-enhanced radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR2003; 181:479 -484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. de Baère T, Risse O, Kuoch V, et al. Adverse events during radiofrequency treatment of 582 hepatic tumors. AJR2003; 181:695 -700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Livraghi T, Solbiati L, Meloni MF, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Goldberg SN. Treatment of focal liver tumors with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: complications encountered in a multicenter study. Radiology2003; 226:441 -451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Mulier S, Mulier P, Ni Y, et al. Complications of radiofrequency coagulation of liver tumours. Br J Surg2002; 89:1206 -1222[Medline]
  23. Rhim H, Yoon KH, Lee JM, et al. Major complications after radio-frequency thermal ablation of hepatic tumors: spectrum of imaging findings. RadioGraphics2003; 23:123 -134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Burke DR, Lewis CA, Cardella JF, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage: Society of Cardiovascular and. Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997;8:677 -681[Medline]
  25. Livraghi T, Solbiati L, Meloni F, Ierace T, Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases in potential candidates for resection: the "test-of-time approach." Cancer 2003;97:3027 -3035[Medline]
  26. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma: conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL Conference. J Hepatol 2001;35:421 -430[Medline]
  27. Giorgio A, Tarantino L, de Stefano G, et al. Complications after interventional sonography of focal liver lesions: a 22-year single-center experience. J Ultrasound Med2003; 22:193 -205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Zagoria RJ, Chen MY, Shen P, Levine EA. Complications from radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases. Am Surg2002; 68:204 -209[Medline]
  29. Buscarini E, Buscarini L. Radiofrequency thermal ablation with expandable needle of focal liver malignancies: complication report. Eur Radiol2004; 14:31 -37[Medline]
  30. Llovet JM, Vilana R, Bru C, et al. Increased risk of tumor seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology2001; 33:1124 -1129[Medline]
  31. Francica G, Iodice G, Marone G. Acute thermal injury of the gallbladder in the course of interstitial radiofrequency hyperthermia treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Ultrasound 1996;4:123 -127
  32. Chopra S, Dodd GD III, Chanin MP, Chintapalli KN. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors adjacent to the gallbladder: feasibility and safety. AJR2003; 180:697 -701[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Giorgio, A. Di Sarno, G. de Stefano, N. Farella, U. Scognamiglio, M. de Stefano, and V. Giorgio
Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Cirrhosis: Are Patients With Neoplastic Main Portal Vein Invasion Eligible for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Both the Nodule and the Portal Venous Tumor Thrombus?
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2009; 193(4): 948 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Willatt, H. K. Hussain, S. Adusumilli, and J. A. Marrero
MR Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Cirrhotic Liver: Challenges and Controversies
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 311 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. E. Maturen, H. V. Nghiem, J. A. Marrero, H. K. Hussain, E. G. Higgins, G. A. Fox, and I. R. Francis
Lack of tumor seeding of hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous needle biopsy using coaxial cutting needle technique.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1184 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Giorgio, G. Ferraioli, D. Choi, and H. K. Lim
Liver Abscess Formation After Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 582 - 583.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giorgio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ferraioli, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giorgio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ferraioli, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS