AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlottmann, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schölmerich, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlottmann, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schölmerich, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 184:574-578
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Technical Innovation

High-Frequency Contrast Harmonic Imaging of Ophthalmic Tumor Perfusion

Klaus Schlottmann1, Barbara Fuchs-Koelwel2, Martina Demmler-Hackenberg2, Veit-Peter Gabel2 and Jürgen Schölmerich1

1 Department of Internal Medicine I and Interdisciplinary Department of Ultrasound, University Hospital of Regensburg, FJS-Allee 11, Regensburg, Germany.
2 Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Received April 14, 2004; accepted after revision June 2, 2004.

 
Presented in part at the 2004 European Symposium on Contrast Ultrasound Imaging, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Address correspondence to K. Schlottmann.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The evaluation of symptomatic or incidentally diagnosed ophthalmic tumors usually is performed using funduscopy and A- and B-mode sonography. Additional techniques are Doppler modes [1], fluorescence or indocyanine green angiography [2], CT [3], and MR tomography [4]. A- and B-mode sonography allows the measurement of tumor depth and size [5], and A-mode and Doppler sonography estimates tumor vascularization and perfusion [6]. Histologic data indicate the importance of tumor vascularization as a determinant of the biologic behavior and the response to radiation therapy of choroidal melanoma. Hence, the analysis of tumor perfusion is crucial to discriminate solid from liquid or degenerative lesions and for the evaluation of response of choroidal melanoma to radiation therapy [7]. Uveal melanoma vascularity also is correlated to its metastatic potential [8].

A new sonographic technique, contrast harmonic imaging, uses IV-administered gas-filled microbubbles that remain intravascular after IV injection [9]. The nonlinear harmonic backscatter signals from such resonating microbubbles now can be visualized continuously at very low transmit power (low mechanical index). We have adapted contrast harmonic imaging at a low mechanical index using the sonographic contrast agent BR1 and a high-frequency transducer to analyze perfusion of ophthalmic tumors. In this feasibility study, we show the analysis of perfusion of choroidal tumors is possible on contrast harmonic imaging, even when other sonographic techniques fail to detect tumor perfusion.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
From July 2002 to August 2003, 16 patients with choroidal melanomas (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F and 2A, 2B) and four patients with choroidal metastases were included in our study after giving informed consent. The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the University Hospital of Regensburg.



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 35-year-old woman with progressive loss of vision. B-mode (A) and power Doppler (B) sonograms show typical choroidal melanoma. Several vessels can be detected on power Doppler sonogram (level 4).

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 35-year-old woman with progressive loss of vision. B-mode (A) and power Doppler (B) sonograms show typical choroidal melanoma. Several vessels can be detected on power Doppler sonogram (level 4).

 


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 35-year-old woman with progressive loss of vision. Contrast harmonic images show time course of tumor perfusion at 0 (C), 10 (D), 33 (E), and 50 (F) sec after injection of contrast agent. Entire lesion is filled with bubbles, which is representative of hyperperfusion of melanoma (level 4). Fifty seconds after injection of contrast bolus, decline of bubble signals in melanoma is evident.

 


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 35-year-old woman with progressive loss of vision. Contrast harmonic images show time course of tumor perfusion at 0 (C), 10 (D), 33 (E), and 50 (F) sec after injection of contrast agent. Entire lesion is filled with bubbles, which is representative of hyperperfusion of melanoma (level 4). Fifty seconds after injection of contrast bolus, decline of bubble signals in melanoma is evident.

 


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. 35-year-old woman with progressive loss of vision. Contrast harmonic images show time course of tumor perfusion at 0 (C), 10 (D), 33 (E), and 50 (F) sec after injection of contrast agent. Entire lesion is filled with bubbles, which is representative of hyperperfusion of melanoma (level 4). Fifty seconds after injection of contrast bolus, decline of bubble signals in melanoma is evident.

 


View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F. 35-year-old woman with progressive loss of vision. Contrast harmonic images show time course of tumor perfusion at 0 (C), 10 (D), 33 (E), and 50 (F) sec after injection of contrast agent. Entire lesion is filled with bubbles, which is representative of hyperperfusion of melanoma (level 4). Fifty seconds after injection of contrast bolus, decline of bubble signals in melanoma is evident.

 


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 73-year-old woman with choroidal melanoma that was irradiated before contrast harmonic imaging. Power Doppler sonogram does not show any blood flow within lesion.

 


View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 73-year-old woman with choroidal melanoma that was irradiated before contrast harmonic imaging. Contrast harmonic image at 23 sec after contrast injection shows lesion that is completely filled with bubble signals (level 4).

 

In the 16 patients with melanomas, 18 sonographic investigations were performed: 10 naïve melanomas and eight pretreated by radiation therapy. Two patients were examined before and after radiation therapy. Of the four patients with choroidal metastases, two had metastasized breast carcinoma, and two had metastasized bronchial carcinoma. All patients with choroidal metastases also showed metastases in other locations.

Choroidal melanomas were diagnosed using funduscopy and A-mode sonography. In one patient with melanoma, histology was obtained by enucleation. For funduscopic analysis, the following criteria were used to define the diagnosis of melanoma: pigmentation, tumor height, orange pigment accompanying serous retinal detachment, localization, secondary glaucoma, cataract, and uveitis. On A-mode sonography, the diagnostic criteria were shape, prominence, reflectivity, and internal structure. The criterion for the diagnosis of melanoma on B-mode sonography was tumor of the posterior pole, and it was level 2–4 perfusion at maximum sensitivity for power Doppler signal detection on power Doppler sonography.

Contrast sonography was performed in all patients after an initial investigation that included funduscopy and A-mode sonography in the outpatient clinic of the department of ophthalmology.

We used a sonography machine (Elegra, Siemens) with a 7.5-MHz transducer (7.5L40, Siemens) adapted to contrast harmonic imaging conditions at a low mechanical index. All patients were evaluated with standard settings; B-mode sonography was performed with or without tissue harmonic imaging. We did not use a mechanical index higher than 0.8, and continuous insonation of one region of the bulbus for longer than 10 sec was avoided. Power Doppler signal was regulated for the most sensitive visualization of tumor vessels without aliasing at low persistence. Contrast harmonic imaging was set to a low mechanical index of 0.1–0.2, the receive amplification was set to 60 dB, and the transmit center frequency was set to 3.3 MHz. These contrast harmonic imaging–specific settings proved to give sufficient microbubble signals with the 7.5-MHz transducer.

After the maximum tumor size (thickness and diameter) was measured, power Doppler sonography was performed. The image with maximum vessel intensity on power Doppler sonography was analyzed later to quantify vascularization. The sonographic contrast agent BR1 (SonoVue [sulfur hexafluoride], Bracco) was prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations. For each investigation, 4.8 mL of BR1 was injected IV as a bolus within 3–5 sec followed by a bolus injection of 10 mL of saline.

The investigator who performed B-mode, power Doppler, and contrast harmonic imaging was blinded to the ophthalmologists' diagnosis. The entire investigation was recorded on VHS videotapes, and additional digital pictures were stored on the hard disk for later analysis. Both power Doppler signals and bubble signals were quantified arbitrarily by division into five levels of intensity (Table 1). After the investigations, one of the authors proposed the most likely diagnosis from the information gained by the sonographic investigations. After the investigations, two experienced sonographers analyzed the videos and assigned the power Doppler and contrast harmonic imaging data of tumor perfusion to the respective levels. All patients were monitored for retinal changes after the contrast harmonic imaging investigation. No bleeding or other type of complication was detected.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Quantification of Tumor Perfusion on Contrast Harmonic Imaging and Power Doppler Sonography

 


Results
Top
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
From September 2002 until July 2003, a total of 16 choroidal melanomas and four metastases were investigated. Ten patients presented with untreated melanomas, and eight patients were treated by radiation therapy, two of whom were examined before and after radiation therapy. One melanoma could not be identified on funduscopy because of its peripheral location, and one tumor could not be analyzed on A-mode sonography. In contrast, all lesions were visualized on B-mode sonography. The mean lesion thickness was 7.8 mm (range, 2.4–19.3 mm) for the un-treated melanomas, 3.8 mm (range, 1.7–9.8 mm) for the irradiated melanomas, and 3.5 mm (range, 2.8–4 mm) for the metastases. The minimum tumor thickness to which power Doppler and contrast harmonic imaging were allowed to apply proved to be 1.5 mm. Tumors with a thickness of less than 1.5 mm were too thin to spatially project blood vessels or particular microbubbles into the tumor. In such lesions, the signals deriving from choroidal vessels could not be distinguished reliably from tumor vessels.

As we expected, the B-mode images alone did not allow discrimination of melanomas from metastases. Power Doppler signals tended to be at higher levels in untreated melanomas than in irradiated melanomas or metastases (Table 1). All untreated melanomas showed level 2–4 power Doppler signals, whereas five of eight irradiated melanomas were devoid of power Doppler signals and only two showed level 4–5 vascularization. In two of eight irradiated melanomas, no bubble signals were detected, but four of eight irradiated melanomas revealed strong perfusion. None of the metastases was positive for power Doppler signals, and all metastases proved to be perfused on contrast harmonic imaging. However, only one metastasis from breast cancer was filled almost completely with microbubbles (level 3), whereas the others revealed weak perfusion with particular bubbles (level 1). All untreated melanomas were perfused heavily on contrast harmonic imaging, with nine of 10 being almost or completely filled with bubbles (levels 3 and 4). A single melanoma that was less perfused (level 2) almost completely occupied the bulbus. In this melanoma, tumor necrosis was most likely responsible for the incomplete filling with contrast microbubbles.

In patients with level 2 or higher tumors, the microbubble inflow into the tumor vessels occurred at a mean time of 21 sec (range, 11–34 sec) after injection of BR1. The maximum bubble intensity in the tumors was reached after 26 sec (range, 14–42 sec). In lesions with level 1 signals, bubble inflow and a signal maximum could not be defined because bubble signals were sparse. Maximum intralesional vascular microbubble intensity lasted for only several seconds, which can be explained by the high microbubble concentration in the inflowing arterial blood after administration of the contrast agent as an IV bolus. In all investigations, the microbubble concentration significantly decreased over time. After a mean of 59 sec (range, 44–129 sec), only sparse signals in all lesion and ophthalmic vessels could be detected.


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The aim of our study was to determine whether high-frequency contrast harmonic imaging at a low mechanical index can be performed in the eye to visualize contrast flow in choroidal tumor vessels. Furthermore, we investigated whether irradiated melanomas are depleted of tumor vessels, which is one of the major criteria used to estimate response to radiation therapy.

We were able to show that the technique of contrast harmonic imaging with BR1 at low mechanical index is feasible. Furthermore, we found that irradiated choroidal melanomas in which no power Doppler signals were detected were still massively perfused by contrast microbubbles. At present, we have no data that support the hypothesis that these patients will develop local recurrence of the choroidal melanomas. For this purpose, further studies are being performed.

Recently, other groups have used sonographic contrast agents to increase the sensitivity for the detection of ophthalmic tumor vessels and tumor perfusion with Doppler techniques [1012]. The transmit energy in these studies was likely higher than a mechanical index of more than 1. In all studies, the contrast agent SH U 508A (Levovist, Schering) was used, which is insufficient for low-mechanical-index contrast harmonic imaging because of the rigid shell. These bubbles are destroyed immediately after insonation at a mechanical index greater than 0.7, which can result in destruction of the vascular endothelium and extravasation [13, 14]. However, no ophthalmic side effects or complications were reported in the investigations described.

In our study, we did not use BR1 to increase color Doppler signals for two reasons. First, the transmitted energy is higher than that recommended by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (recommended mechanical index, ≤ 0.23) when sonographic contrast agents are used at a high mechanical index with color or spectral Doppler sonography [15]. For safety reasons, we exclusively used low-mechanical-index contrast harmonic imaging in the eye with an mechanical index of 0.2 or less to avoid side effects or complications. Because neither symptoms nor signs other than those caused by the underlying disease were observed on funduscopy after the sonographic investigation, it seems that the technique is safe. The second reason is that we expected disadvantages of color Doppler sonography over contrast harmonic imaging to increase the sensitivity to detect very small vessels with low perfusion velocity and few intravascular corpuscles that cause the Doppler shift. Contrast harmonic imaging visualizes single bubble signals moving slowly through tumor vessels down to capillary size. Hence, as we have shown, contrast harmonic imaging is currently the most sensitive method with which to detect perfusion of choroidal tumors. Contrast harmonic imaging seems to be helpful especially when ophthalmoscopic examinations fail because of opaque ophthalmic structures such as the cornea, the lens, or the vitreous.

Contrast harmonic imaging at a low mechanical index could become a powerful tool with which to estimate ophthalmic melanoma response to radiation therapy if irradiated melanomas highly positive for bubble signals prove to be insufficiently irradiated.


References
Top
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Vecsei PV, Kircher K, Nagel G, et al. Ocular arterial blood flow of choroidal melanoma eyes before and after stereotactic radiotherapy using Leksell gamma knife: 2 year follow up. Br J Ophthalmol1999; 83:1324 –1328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Shields CL, Shields JA, De Potter P. Patterns of indocyanine green videoangiography of choroidal tumors. Br J Ophthalmol1995; 79:237 –245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Peyster RG, Augsburger JJ, Shields JA, et al. Choroidal melanoma: comparison of CT, funduscopy, and CT. Radiology1985; 156:675 –680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Seiler T, Bende T, Schilling A, Wollensak J. Magnetic resonance tomography in ophthalmology. I. Choroid melanoma [in German]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd1987; 191:203 –210[Medline]
  5. Ossoinig KC. Standardized echography: basic principles, clinical applications, and results. Int Ophthalmol Clin1979; 19:127 –210[Medline]
  6. Tranquart F, Berges O, Koskas P, et al. Color Doppler imaging of orbital vessels: personal experience and literature review. J Clin Ultrasound 2003;3:258 –273
  7. Wolff-Kormann PG, Kormann BA, Riedel KG, et al. Quantitative color Doppler imaging in un-treated and irradiated choroidal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1992; 33:1928 –1933[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lassau N, Koscielny S, Avril MF, et al. Prognostic value of angiogenesis evaluated with high-frequency and color Doppler sonography for preoperative assessment of melanomas. AJR2002; 178:1547 –1551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Blomley MJ, Cooke JC, Unger EC, Monaghan MJ, Cosgrove DO. Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound. BMJ 2001;322:1222 –1225[Free Full Text]
  10. Cennamo G, Rosa N, Vallone GF, Smaltino F. First experience with a new echographic contrast agent. Br J Ophthalmol1994; 78:823 –826[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Brabrand K, Kerty E, Jakobsen JA. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Doppler examination of the retrobulbar arteries. Acta Radiol 2001;42:135 –139[Medline]
  12. Lemke AJ, Hosten N, Richter M, et al. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography of uveal melanomas. J Clin Ultrasound 2001;29:205 –211[Medline]
  13. [No authors listed]. Section 4: bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies—American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:97 –108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Wible JH Jr, Galen KP, Wojdyla JK, Hughes MS, Klibanov AL, Brandenburger GH. Microbubbles induce renal hemorrhage when exposed to diagnostic ultrasound in anesthetized rats. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28:1535 –1546[Medline]
  15. Computed Imaging Devices Branch, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, Ear, Nose, and Throat and Radiological Devices, Office of Device Evaluation. Information for manufacturers seeking market clearance of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers. Washington, DC: Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, September 30, 1997, pp.1 –74

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlottmann, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schölmerich, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlottmann, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schölmerich, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS