AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mesurolle, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mesurolle, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 184:696-697
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Dynamic Breast MRI in Recurrent Fibromatosis

Benoît Mesurolle1, Isabelle Leconte2, Latifa Fellah2 and Chantal Feger2

1 McGill University Health Center Montréal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
2 Université Catholique de Louvain Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Brussels B-1200, Belgium

We read the article by Nakazono et al. [1] in the December 2003 issue of the AJR with appreciation. We would like to take the opportunity to report a different dynamic enhancing pattern of fibromatosis that we encountered in a patient with recurrent breast fibromatosis.

A 25-year-old woman was referred to us for possible recurrence of breast fibromatosis. She initially underwent surgery 2 years earlier. Clinically a firm and nonmobile lump was palpated in the right breast. Mammography showed a spiculated very dense mass, situated in the surgical bed, with probable muscle invasion; sonographic examination revealed a hypoechoic irregular lesion with acoustic shadowing. Recurrence of breast fibromatosis was suspected, and MRI was performed before surgery for a better analysis of muscle invasion. Bilateral examination was performed in the coronal plane. On contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images and subtracted images, the mass showed a strong enhancement with an extensive pectoralis major muscle involvement. On dynamic MRI, kinetic features showed type II (plateau) and type III (washout) curves (Fig. 1A, 1B). Recurrence was confirmed after extensive surgery with pectoral muscle resection.



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 25-year-old woman with recurrent breast fibromatosis. Contrast-enhanced coronal subtracted MR image reveals rapidly and heterogeneously enhancing irregular mass.

 


View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 25-year-old woman with recurrent breast fibromatosis. Graph of MRI time–signal intensity curves from MR image shows type II (plateau) and type III (washout) curves.

 

Fibromatosis of the breast is an uncommon disease, most often appearing as an aggressive lesion-mimicking carcinoma on mammography and sonography [2]. MRI appearance of breast fibromatosis has been rarely reported and is probably more protean. On dynamic MRI, Nakazono et al. [1] described a gradual enhancement thought to reflect the significant amount of collagenous tissue in and myxoid change of the tumor. Our case showed rapid enhancement on dynamic MRI with type II (plateau) and type III (washout) curves compatible with a malignant lesion [3]. Previous reports on musculoskeletal fibromatosis have described a more aggressive behavior of fibromatosis recurrences [4], which might explain the rapid enhancement observed in our case.

The main interest of breast MRI in cases of breast fibromatosis in our experience remains the accurate evaluation of pectoralis major muscle involvement; this was the reason that this examination was initially performed in our patient [5].


References
Top
References
References 
 

  1. Nakazono T, Satoh T, Hamamoto T, Kudo S. Dynamic MRI of fibromatosis of the breast. AJR2003; 181:1718 –1719[Free Full Text]
  2. Gump FE, Sternschein MJ, Wolff M. Fibromatosis of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;153 : 57–60[Medline]
  3. Khul CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology1999; 211:101 –110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Vandevenne De Schepper AM, De Beuckeleer L, Van Marck E, et al. New concepts in understanding evolution of desmoid tumors: MR imaging of 30 lesions. Eur Radiol1997; 7:1013 –1019[Medline]
  5. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Drotman MB, et al. Evaluation of pectoralis major muscle in patients with posterior breast tumors on breast MR images: early experience. Radiology 2000;214 : 67–72[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reply

Takahiko Nakazono and Sho Kudo

Saga Medical School Saga 849-8501, Japan

We are pleased with the response to our article [1] and the presentation of different types of fibromatosis of the breast by Dr. Mesurolle and colleagues. It is interesting to know that fibromatosis of the breast can have a rapid enhancement and washout on dynamic MRI. Differential diagnosis from carcinoma may be difficult in such a case, although it lacked peripheral ring enhancement typical for breast carcinomas [2]. The difference from our case, which showed a gradual enhancement, was probably due to the difference in cellularity, the amount of collagenous tissue, and myxoid change in the stroma. At any rate, it was a pleasure to learn fibromatosis of the breast can have various faces. Thank you very much.


References 
Top
References
References 
 

  1. Nakazono T, Satoh T, Hamamoto T, Kudo S. Dynamic MRI of fibromatosis of the breast. AJR2003 :181;1718 –1719
  2. Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, Satoh T, Tokunaga O, Kudo S. Breast masses with peripheral enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology2000 :217;841 –848[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. N. Glazebrook and C. A. Reynolds
Mammary Fibromatosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): 856 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mesurolle, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mesurolle, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS