AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodfield, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mirza, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodfield, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mirza, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 184:793-796
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Pharyngeal Retention Cysts: Radiographic Findings in Seven Patients

Courtney A. Woodfield1, Marc S. Levine1, Stephen E. Rubesin1, Igor Laufer1 and Natasha Mirza2

1 Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Received April 22, 2004; accepted after revision June 14, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to M. S. Levine (marc.levine{at}uphs.upenn.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to better characterize the radiographic features of pharyngeal retention cysts on double-contrast pharyngograms.

CONCLUSION. Pharyngeal retention cysts typically involve the valleculae, appearing on double-contrast pharyngograms as small, round or ovoid, well-circumscribed, smooth-surfaced submucosal masses that are best visualized on frontal views of the pharynx. Such features should be highly suggestive of benign retention cysts, obviating further diagnostic workup in asymptomatic patients. When the cysts are lobulated or completely obliterate the valleculae, however, further evaluation by otolaryngologic examination may be required to rule out malignant tumor in the pharynx.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Retention cysts are the most common benign mass lesions in the pharynx, usually involving the valleculae or the aryepiglottic folds [1, 2]. Pathologically, these cysts are thought to result from dilatation of mucus glands in the lamina propria or deeper layers of the pharyngeal wall secondary to retained secretions and chronic inflammation [1]. They usually occur as small, asymptomatic lesions, but cysts larger than 1 cm may cause dysphagia or respiratory symptoms, such as coughing, choking, or aspiration, that necessitate removal of these lesions [13]. Rarely, retention cysts may become ulcerated or secondarily infected [1].

In general, benign pharyngeal lesions appear en face on double-contrast pharyngograms as smooth submucosal masses and in profile as hemispheric lines etched in white [46]. To our knowledge, however, little data are available in the radiology literature about the findings of pharyngeal retention cysts on double-contrast pharyngography. Because barium examinations of the pharynx frequently are performed as the initial diagnostic test in patients with pharyngeal symptoms, it is important to be familiar with the radiographic appearance of pharyngeal retention cysts and to differentiate these common benign lesions from malignant tumors in the pharynx. We therefore performed a retrospective study of patients with pharyngeal retention cysts on double-contrast pharyngography to better characterize the radiographic features of these lesions.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
A computerized search of radiology files at our hospital during a 5-year period from January 1998 to December 2002 revealed 37 patients with pharyngeal retention cysts diagnosed on double-contrast pharyngoesophagograms. Sixteen (43%) of the 37 patients underwent subsequent otolaryngologic examinations for direct visualization of the pharynx. The mean interval between the barium studies and otolaryngologic examinations was 31 days (range, 1–91 days). When patients were stratified on the basis of whether the cysts seen on barium studies were confirmed on otolaryngologic examinations, the mean interval between these studies for patients with cysts confirmed on endoscopy was 21 days (range, 3–44 days) versus 42 days (range, 1–91 days) for those with cysts not confirmed on endoscopy.

According to the endoscopy reports, seven (44%) of the 16 patients had smooth, whitish, translucent submucosal masses characteristic of fluid-filled retention cysts on otolaryngologic examination [7]. Pathologic correlation was available for two of these seven lesions (one was biopsied and the other excised), and both were proven pharyngeal retention cysts. Another patient (6%) had a submucosal mass of uncertain origin on otolaryngologic examination. The lesion also was excised, and pathologic examination of the resected specimen revealed a granular cell tumor. The remaining eight patients (50%) had a normal-appearing pharynx on otolaryngologic examination, so no biopsy specimens were obtained. Thus, seven patients had a final diagnosis of pharyngeal retention cysts based on the gross appearance of the lesions on otolaryngologic examinations in all seven and the histopathologic findings in two. The study group comprised these seven patients.

The double-contrast pharyngoesophagograms were obtained by having the patient ingest a high-density (250% weight/volume [w/v]) barium sulfate suspension (E-Z-HD, E-Z-EM) in lateral, frontal, and, if necessary, oblique positions with videotape recordings obtained during swallowing and subsequent spot images obtained during suspended respiration, phonation ("eeeee") in the lateral position, and a modified Valsalva's maneuver in the frontal position. Unless marked aspiration of high-density barium was observed, the patient subsequently was asked to swallow a low-density (50% w/v) barium sulfate suspension (Entrobar, Lafayette Pharmaceutical) and a barium paste or barium-impregnated food substances such as cookies or crackers. Depending on the patient's condition and clinical history and the findings on the initial portion of the swallowing study, some patients ingested additional high-density barium (E-Z-HD) in the upright, left posterior oblique position or low-density barium (Entrobar) in the prone, right anterior oblique position for double-contrast or single-contrast views of the esophagus. The pharyngoesophagograms were obtained with digital fluoroscopy equipment (Diagnost 76 Plus, Philips). All of the examinations were performed by radiology residents or fellows or by one of three attending gastrointestinal radiologists, and all were interpreted by the attending gastrointestinal radiologists.

The original radiology reports and images from the double-contrast pharyngoesophagograms in these seven patients were reviewed jointly by two gastrointestinal radiologists to determine the location and morphologic features of these lesions, including size, shape (round vs ovoid or other shape), contour (smooth vs nodular or ulcerated), and borders (well circumscribed vs poorly circumscribed). The images were also evaluated for the presence of other pharyngeal findings, including aspiration or other morphologic or functional abnormalities in the pharynx, or esophageal findings, including hiatal hernias, gastroesophageal reflux, reflux esophagitis, and esophageal dysmotility.

Medical records were also reviewed to determine the clinical presentation. The pharyngoesophagograms for the eight patients with normal otolaryngologic examinations and the one patient with a granular cell tumor of the pharynx were also reviewed.

Our institutional review board approved all aspects of this retrospective study and did not require informed consent for patients whose radiographic images or medical records were included in our study.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Clinical Findings
All seven patients with pharyngeal retention cysts were women. The mean age of the patients was 51 years (range, 40–72 years); six patients were 55 year old or younger. Six patients presented with dysphagia that began a mean of 5 weeks (range, 2–8 weeks) before presentation. The remaining patient presented with a globus sensation and throat irritation of 3 weeks' duration. Two patients (29%) had findings of reflux laryngitis on otolaryngologic examinations.

Radiographic Findings
The seven pharyngeal retention cysts appeared on double-contrast pharyngograms as ovoid (n = 6) or round (n = 1) submucosal masses with a smooth contour in five cases (Figs. 1A, 1B, 2, and 3) and a lobulated contour in two (Fig. 4). The lesions had a mean size of 1 cm (range, 0.3–1.6 cm). The cysts were well circumscribed in five cases and poorly circumscribed in two. The cysts involved the valleculae in five cases (left, n = 2; right, n = 3) (Figs. 1A, 1B, 2, and 4), right piriform sinus in one, and right aryepiglottic fold in one (Fig. 3). Two (40%) of the five vallecular cysts partially (n = 1) or completely (n = 1) obliterated the underlying vallecula and the cyst protruded from the superior border of this structure, which no longer filled with barium (Figs. 1A and 2). All of the cysts were seen best on frontal views of the pharynx, and four (57%) were seen only on the frontal views (Fig. 2).



View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. —72-year-old woman with pharyngeal retention cyst. Frontal view from double-contrast pharyngogram shows submucosal mass (arrows) completely obliterating right vallecula.

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. —72-year-old woman with pharyngeal retention cyst. Lateral view from double-contrast pharyngogram also shows submucosal mass etched in white (arrows) protruding superiorly from vallecula.

 


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. —52-year-old woman with pharyngeal retention cyst. Frontal view from double-contrast pharyngogram shows smooth submucosal mass (arrows) partially obliterating left vallecula. No definite lesion was seen in vallecula on lateral view from same examination (not shown).

 


View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. — 47-year-old woman with pharyngeal retention cyst. Frontal view from double-contrast pharyngogram shows small submucosal lesion etched in white (arrow) on right aryepiglottic fold. This was smallest pharyngeal retention cyst in our series.

 


View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. —52-year-old woman with pharyngeal retention cyst. Frontal view from double-contrast pharyngogram shows large, slightly lobulated submucosal mass etched in white (arrows) in right vallecula.

 

Six patients (86%) had normal swallowing function, and one (14%) had mild laryngeal penetration during swallowing. Similarly, six patients (86%) had normal esophageal motility, and one (14%) had mild esophageal dysmotility with intermittent nonperistaltic contractions. Gastroesophageal reflux was reported in five (71%) of the seven patients. Three patients (43%) had hiatal hernias, and two (29%) had reflux esophagitis on double-contrast esophagograms.

The pharyngeal lesions in the eight patients with normal otolaryngologic examinations were all round or ovoid with a smooth surface and well-circumscribed margins. The mean size of these lesions was 0.5 cm (range, 0.3–1.0 cm). These lesions involved the valleculae in seven cases and the left piriform sinus in one.

The one patient with a granular cell tumor of the pharynx had a 1-cm smooth, ovoid, well-circumscribed mass involving the right piriform sinus that was seen best on frontal views of the pharynx (Fig. 5).



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. —24-year-old woman with granular cell tumor. Frontal view from double-contrast pharyngogram shows smooth submucosal mass etched in white (arrows) in right piriform sinus. This lesion is indistinguishable from retention cyst on basis of radiographic findings. Dilatation of proximal esophagus above midesophageal stricture (not shown) caused by previous ingestion of potassium chloride tablets was also noted.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Pharyngeal retention cysts are benign lesions with no risk of malignant degeneration [1]. Nevertheless, it is important for radiologists to be familiar with the appearance of these lesions so they are not mistaken for malignant tumors in the pharynx. The ability to identify characteristic radiographic features of pharyngeal retention cysts therefore could lead to a decreased number of unnecessary otolaryngologic examinations for biopsy or excision of the cysts, particularly if affected individuals have no symptoms referable to these lesions.

All of the pharyngeal retention cysts in our patients involved the valleculae or, less frequently, the piriform sinuses or aryepiglottic folds. The lesions typically appeared on double-contrast pharyngograms as small, round or ovoid, well-circumscribed, smooth-surfaced submucosal masses etched in white that were best visualized on frontal views of the pharynx (Figs. 2 and 3). Such features should be highly suggestive of benign retention cysts, obviating further diagnostic workup unless symptoms are severe enough to warrant drainage or excision of the cysts. In some cases, however, these cysts were lobulated (Fig. 4) or completely obliterated the underlying vallecula (Fig. 1A), findings that necessitate further evaluation by otolaryngologic examination to rule out malignant tumor in this region. Thus, radiologists should recognize that not all retention cysts have the classic radiographic features of benign pharyngeal lesions.

The differential diagnosis for smooth, well-circumscribed submucosal masses in the pharynx includes other uncommon benign neoplasms such as granular cell tumors, lipomas, neurofibromas, chondromas, papillomas, hamartomas, and oncocytomas [2, 5, 8, 9]. In our study, one patient had a granular cell tumor that was indistinguishable from a pharyngeal retention cyst on the basis of the radiographic findings (Fig. 5). However, some patients with granular cell tumors of the pharynx have associated granular cell tumors in the esophagus or stomach [10]. In other cases, the correct diagnosis may be suggested by the clinical history, as in patients with known neurofibromatosis or squamous papillomatosis. Another potentially helpful finding is the location of the lesion: For example, pharyngeal chondromas typically arise from the cricoid cartilage [2, 5], whereas retention cysts tend to involve the valleculae.

In our series, eight (50%) of the 16 pharyngeal retention cysts diagnosed on double-contrast pharyngograms were not described on the reports from the otolaryngologic examinations. It is well recognized that endoscopy may fail to reveal small pharyngeal retention cysts because of their predominantly submucosal origin and normal overlying mucosa [2, 11]. Alternatively, some of the cysts visualized on otolaryngologic examinations may not have been mentioned in the endoscopy reports because of the general perception that these lesions are not clinically important. Also, patients with cysts seen on barium studies but not on endoscopy had a longer mean interval between these examinations than those with cysts that were seen on endoscopy (42 days vs 21 days), raising the possibility that some of the lesions may have resolved spontaneously before the otolaryngologic examinations were performed. To our knowledge, however, spontaneous resolution of pharyngeal retention cysts has not been described previously. Finally, one or more of the eight lesions detected on barium studies that were not confirmed on otolaryngologic examinations could have represented false-positive radiographic findings. Whatever the explanation, our study is limited by a lack of pathologic correlation in many of the patients with pharyngeal retention cysts diagnosed on double-contrast pharyngography.

The presence or absence of symptoms in patients with pharyngeal retention cysts or other benign pharyngeal masses is directly related to the size and location of these lesions. In general, cysts smaller than 1 cm are less likely to cause symptoms than those larger than 1 cm [1]. However, cysts arising on the aryepiglottic folds may cause dysphonia or respiratory symptoms regardless of size, and cysts involving the valleculae, epiglottis, or aryepiglottic folds may cause coughing, choking, or dysphagia [2]. Cysts involving the valleculae or epiglottis may also produce a globus sensation, and rarely, pedunculated cysts may even occlude the larynx [5]. Although six (86%) of the seven patients in our series presented with dysphagia, only two of these patients had cysts larger than 1 cm. In the remaining four patients with cysts 1 cm or smaller, the cysts may have been detected as fortuitous findings unrelated to the dysphagia in these individuals.

In general, there is no reason to resect small pharyngeal retention cysts that are not causing symptoms. However, larger cysts or those causing dysphagia or other symptoms can be incised and drained with excellent results [12]. Although it is not always possible to remove the entire lesion, recurrence of the cysts after complete or partial excision is rare [3, 13].

In conclusion, pharyngeal retention cysts typically involve the valleculae, appearing on double-contrast pharyngograms as small, round or ovoid, well-circumscribed, smooth-surfaced submucosal masses that are best visualized on frontal views of the pharynx. Such features should be highly suggestive of benign retention cysts, obviating further diagnostic workup in asymptomatic patients. When the cysts are lobulated or completely obliterate the valleculae, however, further evaluation by otolaryngologic examination may be required to rule out malignant tumor in the pharynx. It is important to differentiate pharyngeal retention cysts from malignant tumors on the basis of the radiographic findings because double-contrast pharyngography frequently is performed as the initial diagnostic test in these patients.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Soule EH. Tumors of the hypopharynx and pharyngeal area. In: Dockerty MB, Parkhill EM, Dahlin DC, Woolner LB, Soule EH, Harrison EG, eds. Tumors of the oral cavity and pharynx, section 4, fasc. 10b. Washington, DC: U.S. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology,1964 :167–242
  2. Rubesin SE. The pharynx. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, eds.Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders,2000 :227–255
  3. Pogosov VS, Antoniv VF, Bespalyi VN. Microscopy and microsurgery of the larynx and laryngopharynx. Madison, WI: International Universities Press Inc.,1987 :105–151
  4. Jiminez JR. Roentgen examination of the oropharynx and oral cavity. Radiol Clin North Am1970; 8:413 -424[Medline]
  5. Balfe DM, Heiken JP. Contrast evaluation of structural lesions of the pharynx. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol1986; 15:73 -160[Medline]
  6. Rubesin SE, Glick SN. The tailored double-contrast pharyngogram. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging1988; 28:133 -179[Medline]
  7. Benjamin B. Cystic disease in the larynx. In: Benjamin B, ed. Diagnostic laryngology: adults and children. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1990:151 -154
  8. Rebeiz EE, Shapshay SM. Benign lesions of the larynx. In: Bailey BJ, Calhoun KH, Healy GB, Pillsbury HC III, Johnson JT, Tardy ME Jr, Jackler RK, eds. Head and neck surgery-otolaryngology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001:617 -626
  9. Victoria LV, Hoffman HT, Robinson RA. Granular cell tumors of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol1998; 112:373 -376[Medline]
  10. Radin DR, Zelner R, Ray MJ, Cohen H, Halls JM. Multiple granular cell tumors of the skin and gastrointestinal tract. AJR 1986;147:1305 -1307[Free Full Text]
  11. Guo YC, Chu PY, Lee RC, Chang SY. Radiology forum: quiz case 2—retention cyst of the postcricoid region. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:84 , 86[Free Full Text]
  12. Viani L, Donnelly M. Non-malignant disease of the pharynx. In: Jones AS, Phillips DE, Hilfers FJM, eds. Diseases of the head and neck, nose, and throat. London, England: Arnold,1998 : 574-585
  13. Ranger D. Tumours of the pharynx. In: Ballantyne J, Groves J, eds. Scott-Brown's diseases of the ear, nose, and throat. London, England: Butterworths, 1979:171 -206

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodfield, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mirza, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodfield, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mirza, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS