AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prologo, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prologo, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2005; 184:1231-1235
© American Roentgen Ray Society

The Effect of Single-Detector CT Versus MDCT on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Negative Results on CT Pulmonary Angiography

John David Prologo, Robert C. Gilkeson, Mireya Diaz and Matthew Cummings

Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106.

Received May 14, 2004; accepted after revision August 16, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to J. D. Prologo (jdprologo{at}hotmail.com).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of patients in whom pulmonary embolism (PE) has been ruled out with single-detector CT versus MDCT, given the improved visualization of subsegmental clots with the latter and the recent increase in use of CT for evaluation of PE.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two cohorts of patients undergoing CT for suspected PE with either single-detector CT (3-mm collimation and pitch of 1.7) or MDCT (2-mm collimation and pitch of 1) scanners were prospectively observed and compared using predefined criteria for evidence of subsequent thromboembolic disease during the 6 months after the acquisition of their initial scan.

RESULTS. Ninety-eight patients were scanned using a single-detector CT scanner. Of these, none had evidence of subsequent PE or deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and six (6.1%) died of unrelated causes. Of the 100 patients scanned using an MDCT scanner, one (1.0%) had a subsequent nonfatal PE 2 months after the initial scanning, one (1.0%) had DVT 1 month after the initial scanning, and eight (8.0%) died of unrelated causes. No significant difference was found in either the probability of subsequent thromboembolic events ({chi}2 = 0.3183, degrees of freedom [df] = 1, p = 1) or frequency of unrelated deaths ({chi}2 = 0.2655, df = 1, p = 0.7829) between patients scanned using single-detector CT or MDCT protocols.

CONCLUSION. Our results show that patients with suspected acute PE and negative CT results have acceptable clinical outcomes in the absence of anticoagulation treatment up to 6 months after acquisition of their initial scan. Furthermore, we found that the increased visualization of smaller, more peripheral arteries afforded by multislice technology did not affect clinical outcome.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition with the potential to masquerade as a variety of common disorders, and no single test exists for its definitive diagnosis. As a result, PE has historically proven to be a difficult diagnosis [1-4].

The development of helical CT technology provided a rapid, noninvasive way to evaluate the pulmonary vasculature and led to widespread adjustment of the radiologic contribution to evaluation of suspected PE [5-9]. Early work with single-detector scanners showed similar sensitivity and specificity of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with regard to PE detection when compared with nuclear ventilation-perfusion scanning and conventional invasive pulmonary angiography, particularly in the proximal arteries [10-13] (Fig. 1). The development of MDCT resulted in faster scans with improved contrast enhancement, thinner collimation, and subsequent improvement in visualization of the peripheral arterial tree [14-18]. The ability of CTPA to detect concurrent or mimicking disease further expands its diagnostic utility, and recent studies have shown acceptable clinical outcomes for untreated patients after a CTPA examination with negatively interpreted results [19-25].



View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. 45-year-old woman who presented with chest pain and hypoxia. Selected axial image from CTPA performed on single-detector CT scanner shows filling defects in main pulmonary arteries bilaterally, illustrating established ability of this technique to reveal emboli in proximal pulmonary vasculature.

 

These attributes, plus its efficiency and increasing availability, have led to a widespread increase in the use of CTPA as a first-line imaging technique in patients with suspected cardiothoracic disease [26]. To our knowledge, no study has analyzed the effect of improved ability to interrogate distal vasculature afforded by MDCT on clinical outcome. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients in whom PE was ruled out with single-detector CT versus MDCT.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Appropriate institutional review board approval was obtained and guidelines followed regarding enrollment into and execution of this study. Patients undergoing CTPA for suspected PE over a 4-month period were identified. During this period in our institution, CTPA examinations were being performed either on a single-detector (PQ5000, Philips Medical Systems) CT or MDCT (Mx8000, Philips Medical Systems) scanner, based on availability. Two hundred thirty two patients underwent CTPA for suspected PE during the enrollment period. Patients whose scans were limited by body habitus, inadequately timed contrast bolus, or motion artifact were excluded (n = 11). Elimination of these variables allowed us to make direct comparisons of outcomes in patients whose pulmonary vasculature was confidently interrogated with one technique or the other. One hundred twelve patients who underwent a single-detector CT examination (41 men and 71 women; age range, 19-83 years; mean, 57.1 ± 19.6 [SD] years) and 109 who underwent MDCT imaging (49 men and 60 women; age range, 18-92 years; mean, 58.3 ± 21.2 years) were included. Images were interpreted with available 3D reconstructions at workstations by attending radiologists as part of clinical duties.

All patients underwent scanning of the entire chest in a cephalocaudal direction during a single breath-hold after the administration of IV contrast material (iohexol, Omnipaque 300, Nycomed Imaging). For single-detector CT examinations, 140 mL of contrast material was injected at a fixed rate of 2 mL/sec, with an average image acquisition time of 35 sec (3-mm collimation, pitch of 1.7, 120 kV, 250 mA). For examinations performed with MDCT, 90 mL of contrast material was injected at a rate of 4 mL/sec, with an average image acquisition time of 16 sec (2-mm collimation, pitch of 1, 120 kV, 250 mA). Saline flushes were not used in either group.

Patients with negatively interpreted examination results were systematically followed up for evidence of subsequent thromboembolic disease (PE or deep venous thrombosis [DVT]) up to 6 months after acquisition of their initial scan. Specifically, radiographic reports and discharge summaries were evaluated for positive results on other diagnostic studies or the institution of anticoagulation treatment. Also, for those patients who could not be definitively identified as having a clear thromboembolic or life-ending event via report surveillance, a telephone survey was used with the goal of identifying the aforementioned clinical parameters at 3 and 6 months. The survey incorporated a standard questionnaire written using lay terms that included items regarding cause and location of death if the patient died, potential subsequent hospitalizations (including discharge diagnoses, dates, and locations), new diagnoses (e.g., "blood clots" or "thrombus"), and new medications (e.g.,"blood thinners"). The incidence of subsequent thromboembolic events in the two groups was compared using chi-square analysis.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
No significant demographic difference was found between the two groups, and there was no significant difference in the number of positive examinations performed on single-detector CT versus MDCT scanners (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.38). The overall prevalence of PE was 10.4% (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Geographic Distribution of Exams and Positivity Rates During Study Period

 

Of the 98 patients with negative examination results from the single-detector CT scanner, none had evidence of subsequent PE or DVT, and six (6.1%) died of unrelated causes. Of the 100 patients with negative results on MDCT examination, one (1.0%) had a subsequent nonfatal PE 2 months after the initial examination, one (1.0%) had DVT 1 month after the examination, and eight (8.0%) died of unrelated causes. There was no significant difference in either the probability of subsequent thromboembolic events ({chi}2 = 0.3183, degrees of freedom [df] = 1, p = 1) or frequency of unrelated deaths ({chi}2 = 0.2655, df = 1, p = 0.7829) between patients scanned using single-detector CT or MDCT protocols.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The development of MDCT has led to increased visualization of segmental and subsegmental emboli [14] (Fig. 2). Additional detectors along the z-axis allow imaging of greater anatomic distances per exposure when compared with single-detector technology [27]. This results in improved use of the contrast bolus and shorter breath-holds via faster scanning times and increased resolution of smaller objects via thinner collimation [15-18, 28].



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. 57-year-old man with chest pain. Selected axial image from CTPA performed on MDCT scanner shows filling defects (arrows) in arterial branches to medial basal segment of right lower lobe, illustrating the ability of MDCT to reveal subsegmental emboli.

 

An increased radiation dose is inherently delivered to the patient with MDCT because the width of the X-ray beam exceeds that of the detectors, a well-known dose inefficiency related to the maintenance of uniform section sensitivity profiles with multiple detector rows [27, 29]. Additional increases in patient radiation dose may be experienced when improved signal-to-noise ratios are sought with higher tube currents [29]. No such adjustments were made for this study.

Our results show that patients with suspected acute PE and negative CTPA findings have acceptable clinical outcomes in the absence of treatment or anticoagulation therapy for as long as 6 months. These results are consistent with recent reports regarding outcome after negative results on CTPA [22-25] and are comparable to reports of recurrent thromboembolic disease after negative results on conventional pulmonary angiography [30-32]. In addition, there was no advantage to MDCT with regard to clinical outcome. That is, the increased visualization of subsegmental arteries afforded by MDCT technology did not affect the negative predictive value of our CTPA examination.

It is likely that small distal emboli were missed in the group who underwent CTPA with single-detector CT technique. Oser et al. [33] showed that 30% of pulmonary emboli diagnosed with conventional pulmonary angiography would have been missed with CTPA techniques limited to segmental and larger artery evaluation. The similar clinical outcomes of patients examined with single-detector CT and MDCT protocols in this study suggest that the presence of a subsegmental clot not visualized on single-detector CT technique may not have significant clinical impact. This is an important question because the use of CTPA continues to increase coincident with technologic advances that afford better visualization of smaller clots [14-16, 26].

The extremes of clot burden on the pulmonary vasculature are related to clinical presentation and course. Smaller clots are known to have less dramatic clinical manifestations and lower mortality and morbidity rates [34, 35]. Large clots resulting in right heart strain or hypotension have worse clinical outcomes than smaller clots without these associations [36-38], and it has recently been suggested that indexes of pulmonary embolic obstruction as quantified with CT are predictive of patient survival [39].

The risks associated with anticoagulation are well documented, and protocols involving the long-term use of anticoagulation therapy are currently being re-examined [40]. For example, a recent study found a 10 times higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke in patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy when compared with the general population [41]. In the future, as the rate of CTPA-detected subsegmental PE increases, clinicians will need to consider the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulation in patients with previously undetectable small clots in the peripheral pulmonary vasculature.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Goldhaber SZ. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin Cornerstone 2000;2:38 -46[Medline]
  2. Karwinski B. Comparison of clinical and postmortem diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. J Clin Pathol1989; 42:135 -139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Diebold J. Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a study of 5,039 autopsies. Pathol Res Pract1991; 187:260 -266[Medline]
  4. Meignan M, Rosso J, Gauthier H, et al. Systemic lung scans reveal a high frequency of silent pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med2000; 160:159 -164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kline JA, Johns KL, Colucciello SA, Israel EG. New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med2000; 35:168 -180[Medline]
  6. Indik JH, Alpert JS. Detection of pulmonary embolism by D-dimer assay, spiral computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Prog Cardiovasc Dis2000; 42:261 -272[Medline]
  7. Smith TP. Pulmonary embolism: what's wrong with this diagnosis? AJR 2000;174:1489 -1497[Free Full Text]
  8. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet2002; 360:1914 -1920[Medline]
  9. Trowbridge RL, Araoz PA, Gotway MB. The effect of helical computed tomography on diagnostic and treatment strategies in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med2004; 116:84 -90[Medline]
  10. Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, et al. Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. AJR2000; 174:1041 -1047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. AJR1995; 164:1369 -1374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology1996; 200:699 -706[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, et al. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique—comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology1992; 185:381 -387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK, et al. Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. Radiology2002; 222:483 -490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Patel S, Kazerooni EA, Cascade PN. Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small artery visualization at multi-detector row CT. Radiology2003; 227:455 -460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Raptopoulos V, Boiselle. Multi-detector row spiral CT pulmonary angiography: comparison with single-detector row spiral CT. Radiology2001; 221:606 -613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, et al. Peripheral pulmonary arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol. Radiology1997; 204:157 -163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Remy-Jardin M, Baghaie F, Bonnel F, et al. Thoracic helical CT: influence of subsecond scan time and thin collimation on evaluation of peripheral pulmonary arteries. Eur Radiol2000; 10:1297 -1303[Medline]
  19. Garg K. CT of pulmonary thromboembolic disease. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:111 -122.[Medline]
  20. Richman PB, Courtney DM, Friese J, et al. Chest CT angiography (CTA) to rule-out pulmonary embolism (PE) frequently reveals clinically significant ancillary findings: a multi-center study of 1025 emergency department patients. (abstr) Acad Emerg Med2003; 10:564 -565
  21. Garg K, Macey L. Helical CT scanning in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Respiration2003; 70:231 -237[Medline]
  22. Nilsson T, Olausson A, Johnsson H, et al. Negative spiral CT in acute pulmonary embolism. Acta Radiol2002; 43:486 -491[Medline]
  23. Bourriot K, Couffinhal T, Bernard V, et al. Clinical outcome after a negative spiral CT pulmonary angiographic finding in an inpatient population from cardiology and pneumology wards. Chest2003; 123:359 -365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Swensen SJ, Sheedy PF, Ryu JH, et al. Outcomes after withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:130 -138[Medline]
  25. Donato AA, Scheirer JJ, Atwell MS, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative helical computed tomographic results in whom anticoagulation was withheld. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2033 -2038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, Asaad J. CT pulmonary angiography: a comparative analysis of the utilization patterns in emergency department and hospitalized patients between 1998 and 2003. AJR2004; 183:1093 -1096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. McCollough CH, Zink FE. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys1999; 26:2223 -2230[Medline]
  28. Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, et al. Four multidetector-row helical CT on image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology2000; 215:55 -62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002:342 -369
  30. Novelline RA, Baltarowich OH, Athanasoulls CA, et al. The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative pulmonary arteriogram. Radiology1978; 126:561 -567[Abstract]
  31. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation1992; 85:462 -468[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Henry JW, Relyea B, Stein PD, et al. Continuing risk of thromboemboli among patients with normal pulmonary angiograms. Chest 1995;107:1375 -1378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Oser RF, Zuckerman DA, Gutierrez FR, et al. Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross sectional imaging. Radiology1996; 199:31 -35[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, DeRosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the international cooperative pulmonary embolism registry (ICOPER). Lancet1999; 353:1386 -1389[Medline]
  35. Grifoni S, Olivotto I, Cecchini P, et al. Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction. Circulation2000; 101:2817 -2822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Podbregar M, Krivec B, Voga G. Impact of morphologic characteristics of central pulmonary thromboemboli in massive pulmonary embolism. Chest2002; 122:973 -979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Wood KE. Major pulmonary embolism: a review of a pathophysiologic approach to the golden hour of hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. Chest 2002;121:877 -905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Stein PD, Henry JW. Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pulmonary embolism stratified according to their presenting syndromes. Chest 1997;112:974 -979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Wu AS, Pezzullo JA, Cronan JJ, et al. CT pulmonary angiography: quantification of pulmonary embolus as a predictor of patient outcome—initial experience. Radiology2004; 230:831 -835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Iorio A, Guercini F, Pini M. Low-molecular-weight heparin for the long-term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: meta-analysis of the randomized comparisons with oral anticoagulants. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1:1906 -1913[Medline]
  41. Sjalander A, Engstrom G, Berntorp E. Risk of haemorrhagic stroke in patients with oral anticoagulation compared with the general population. (abstr) J Intern Med2003; 254:434 -438[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Roggenland, S. A. Peters, S. P. Lemburg, T. Holland-Letz, V. Nicolas, and C. M. Heyer
CT Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Impact of Patient Characteristics and Different Venous Lines on Vessel Enhancement and Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W351 - W359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. M. Heyer, P. S. Mohr, S. P. Lemburg, S. A. Peters, and V. Nicolas
Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Pulmonary CT Angiography with 100- or 120-kVp Protocol: Prospective Randomized Study
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 577 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
S. R Desai
Unsuspected pulmonary embolism on CT scanning: yet another headache for clinicians?
Thorax, June 1, 2007; 62(6): 470 - 472.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
K Hogg, G Brown, J Dunning, J Wright, S Carley, B Foex, and K Mackway-Jones
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with CT pulmonary angiography: a systematic review
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 172 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prologo, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prologo, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS