AJR 2005; 184:1231-1235
© American Roentgen Ray Society
The Effect of Single-Detector CT Versus MDCT on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Negative Results on CT Pulmonary Angiography
John David Prologo,
Robert C. Gilkeson,
Mireya Diaz and
Matthew Cummings
Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid
Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106.
Received May 14, 2004;
accepted after revision August 16, 2004.
Address correspondence to J. D. Prologo
(jdprologo{at}hotmail.com).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of patients in
whom pulmonary embolism (PE) has been ruled out with single-detector CT versus
MDCT, given the improved visualization of subsegmental clots with the latter
and the recent increase in use of CT for evaluation of PE.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two cohorts of patients undergoing CT for
suspected PE with either single-detector CT (3-mm collimation and pitch of
1.7) or MDCT (2-mm collimation and pitch of 1) scanners were prospectively
observed and compared using predefined criteria for evidence of subsequent
thromboembolic disease during the 6 months after the acquisition of their
initial scan.
RESULTS. Ninety-eight patients were scanned using a single-detector
CT scanner. Of these, none had evidence of subsequent PE or deep venous
thrombosis (DVT), and six (6.1%) died of unrelated causes. Of the 100 patients
scanned using an MDCT scanner, one (1.0%) had a subsequent nonfatal PE 2
months after the initial scanning, one (1.0%) had DVT 1 month after the
initial scanning, and eight (8.0%) died of unrelated causes. No significant
difference was found in either the probability of subsequent thromboembolic
events (
2 = 0.3183, degrees of freedom [df] = 1,
p = 1) or frequency of unrelated deaths (
2 = 0.2655,
df = 1, p = 0.7829) between patients scanned using
single-detector CT or MDCT protocols.
CONCLUSION. Our results show that patients with suspected acute PE
and negative CT results have acceptable clinical outcomes in the absence of
anticoagulation treatment up to 6 months after acquisition of their initial
scan. Furthermore, we found that the increased visualization of smaller, more
peripheral arteries afforded by multislice technology did not affect clinical
outcome.
Introduction
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition with the
potential to masquerade as a variety of common disorders, and no single test
exists for its definitive diagnosis. As a result, PE has historically proven
to be a difficult diagnosis
[1-4].
The development of helical CT technology provided a rapid, noninvasive way
to evaluate the pulmonary vasculature and led to widespread adjustment of the
radiologic contribution to evaluation of suspected PE
[5-9].
Early work with single-detector scanners showed similar sensitivity and
specificity of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with regard to PE detection
when compared with nuclear ventilation-perfusion scanning and conventional
invasive pulmonary angiography, particularly in the proximal arteries
[10-13]
(Fig. 1). The development of
MDCT resulted in faster scans with improved contrast enhancement, thinner
collimation, and subsequent improvement in visualization of the peripheral
arterial tree
[14-18].
The ability of CTPA to detect concurrent or mimicking disease further expands
its diagnostic utility, and recent studies have shown acceptable clinical
outcomes for untreated patients after a CTPA examination with negatively
interpreted results
[19-25].

View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1. 45-year-old woman who presented with chest pain and hypoxia.
Selected axial image from CTPA performed on single-detector CT scanner shows
filling defects in main pulmonary arteries bilaterally, illustrating
established ability of this technique to reveal emboli in proximal pulmonary
vasculature.
|
|
These attributes, plus its efficiency and increasing availability, have led
to a widespread increase in the use of CTPA as a first-line imaging technique
in patients with suspected cardiothoracic disease
[26]. To our knowledge, no
study has analyzed the effect of improved ability to interrogate distal
vasculature afforded by MDCT on clinical outcome. The purpose of this study is
to compare the clinical outcomes of patients in whom PE was ruled out with
single-detector CT versus MDCT.
Subjects and Methods
Appropriate institutional review board approval was obtained and guidelines
followed regarding enrollment into and execution of this study. Patients
undergoing CTPA for suspected PE over a 4-month period were identified. During
this period in our institution, CTPA examinations were being performed either
on a single-detector (PQ5000, Philips Medical Systems) CT or MDCT (Mx8000,
Philips Medical Systems) scanner, based on availability. Two hundred thirty
two patients underwent CTPA for suspected PE during the enrollment period.
Patients whose scans were limited by body habitus, inadequately timed contrast
bolus, or motion artifact were excluded (n = 11). Elimination of
these variables allowed us to make direct comparisons of outcomes in patients
whose pulmonary vasculature was confidently interrogated with one technique or
the other. One hundred twelve patients who underwent a single-detector CT
examination (41 men and 71 women; age range, 19-83 years; mean, 57.1 ±
19.6 [SD] years) and 109 who underwent MDCT imaging (49 men and 60 women; age
range, 18-92 years; mean, 58.3 ± 21.2 years) were included. Images were
interpreted with available 3D reconstructions at workstations by attending
radiologists as part of clinical duties.
All patients underwent scanning of the entire chest in a cephalocaudal
direction during a single breath-hold after the administration of IV contrast
material (iohexol, Omnipaque 300, Nycomed Imaging). For single-detector CT
examinations, 140 mL of contrast material was injected at a fixed rate of 2
mL/sec, with an average image acquisition time of 35 sec (3-mm collimation,
pitch of 1.7, 120 kV, 250 mA). For examinations performed with MDCT, 90 mL of
contrast material was injected at a rate of 4 mL/sec, with an average image
acquisition time of 16 sec (2-mm collimation, pitch of 1, 120 kV, 250 mA).
Saline flushes were not used in either group.
Patients with negatively interpreted examination results were
systematically followed up for evidence of subsequent thromboembolic disease
(PE or deep venous thrombosis [DVT]) up to 6 months after acquisition of their
initial scan. Specifically, radiographic reports and discharge summaries were
evaluated for positive results on other diagnostic studies or the institution
of anticoagulation treatment. Also, for those patients who could not be
definitively identified as having a clear thromboembolic or life-ending event
via report surveillance, a telephone survey was used with the goal of
identifying the aforementioned clinical parameters at 3 and 6 months. The
survey incorporated a standard questionnaire written using lay terms that
included items regarding cause and location of death if the patient died,
potential subsequent hospitalizations (including discharge diagnoses, dates,
and locations), new diagnoses (e.g., "blood clots" or
"thrombus"), and new medications (e.g.,"blood
thinners"). The incidence of subsequent thromboembolic events in the two
groups was compared using chi-square analysis.
Results
No significant demographic difference was found between the two groups, and
there was no significant difference in the number of positive examinations
performed on single-detector CT versus MDCT scanners (Fisher's exact test,
p = 0.38). The overall prevalence of PE was 10.4%
(Table 1).
Of the 98 patients with negative examination results from the
single-detector CT scanner, none had evidence of subsequent PE or DVT, and six
(6.1%) died of unrelated causes. Of the 100 patients with negative results on
MDCT examination, one (1.0%) had a subsequent nonfatal PE 2 months after the
initial examination, one (1.0%) had DVT 1 month after the examination, and
eight (8.0%) died of unrelated causes. There was no significant difference in
either the probability of subsequent thromboembolic events (
2
= 0.3183, degrees of freedom [df] = 1, p = 1) or frequency
of unrelated deaths (
2 = 0.2655, df = 1, p =
0.7829) between patients scanned using single-detector CT or MDCT
protocols.
Discussion
The development of MDCT has led to increased visualization of segmental and
subsegmental emboli [14]
(Fig. 2). Additional detectors
along the z-axis allow imaging of greater anatomic distances per
exposure when compared with single-detector technology
[27]. This results in improved
use of the contrast bolus and shorter breath-holds via faster scanning times
and increased resolution of smaller objects via thinner collimation
[15-18,
28].

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2. 57-year-old man with chest pain. Selected axial image from
CTPA performed on MDCT scanner shows filling defects (arrows) in
arterial branches to medial basal segment of right lower lobe, illustrating
the ability of MDCT to reveal subsegmental emboli.
|
|
An increased radiation dose is inherently delivered to the patient with
MDCT because the width of the X-ray beam exceeds that of the detectors, a
well-known dose inefficiency related to the maintenance of uniform section
sensitivity profiles with multiple detector rows
[27,
29]. Additional increases in
patient radiation dose may be experienced when improved signal-to-noise ratios
are sought with higher tube currents
[29]. No such adjustments were
made for this study.
Our results show that patients with suspected acute PE and negative CTPA
findings have acceptable clinical outcomes in the absence of treatment or
anticoagulation therapy for as long as 6 months. These results are consistent
with recent reports regarding outcome after negative results on CTPA
[22-25]
and are comparable to reports of recurrent thromboembolic disease after
negative results on conventional pulmonary angiography
[30-32].
In addition, there was no advantage to MDCT with regard to clinical outcome.
That is, the increased visualization of subsegmental arteries afforded by MDCT
technology did not affect the negative predictive value of our CTPA
examination.
It is likely that small distal emboli were missed in the group who
underwent CTPA with single-detector CT technique. Oser et al.
[33] showed that 30% of
pulmonary emboli diagnosed with conventional pulmonary angiography would have
been missed with CTPA techniques limited to segmental and larger artery
evaluation. The similar clinical outcomes of patients examined with
single-detector CT and MDCT protocols in this study suggest that the presence
of a subsegmental clot not visualized on single-detector CT technique may not
have significant clinical impact. This is an important question because the
use of CTPA continues to increase coincident with technologic advances that
afford better visualization of smaller clots
[14-16,
26].
The extremes of clot burden on the pulmonary vasculature are related to
clinical presentation and course. Smaller clots are known to have less
dramatic clinical manifestations and lower mortality and morbidity rates
[34,
35]. Large clots resulting in
right heart strain or hypotension have worse clinical outcomes than smaller
clots without these associations
[36-38],
and it has recently been suggested that indexes of pulmonary embolic
obstruction as quantified with CT are predictive of patient survival
[39].
The risks associated with anticoagulation are well documented, and
protocols involving the long-term use of anticoagulation therapy are currently
being re-examined [40]. For
example, a recent study found a 10 times higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke in
patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy when compared with the general
population [41]. In the
future, as the rate of CTPA-detected subsegmental PE increases, clinicians
will need to consider the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulation in patients
with previously undetectable small clots in the peripheral pulmonary
vasculature.
References
- Goldhaber SZ. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin
Cornerstone 2000;2:38
-46[Medline]
- Karwinski B. Comparison of clinical and postmortem diagnosis of
pulmonary embolism. J Clin Pathol1989; 42:135
-139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Diebold J. Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a study of
5,039 autopsies. Pathol Res Pract1991; 187:260
-266[Medline]
- Meignan M, Rosso J, Gauthier H, et al. Systemic lung scans reveal a
high frequency of silent pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep
venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med2000; 160:159
-164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kline JA, Johns KL, Colucciello SA, Israel EG. New diagnostic tests
for pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med2000; 35:168
-180[Medline]
- Indik JH, Alpert JS. Detection of pulmonary embolism by D-dimer
assay, spiral computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis2000; 42:261
-272[Medline]
- Smith TP. Pulmonary embolism: what's wrong with this diagnosis?
AJR 2000;174:1489
-1497[Free Full Text]
- Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al. Diagnostic strategy for
patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome
study. Lancet2002; 360:1914
-1920[Medline]
- Trowbridge RL, Araoz PA, Gotway MB. The effect of helical computed
tomography on diagnostic and treatment strategies in patients with suspected
pulmonary embolism. Am J Med2004; 116:84
-90[Medline]
- Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, et al. Pulmonary embolism
revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion
radionuclide lung scanning. AJR2000; 174:1041
-1047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, et al. Detection of pulmonary
embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis:
helical CT versus angiography. AJR1995; 164:1369
-1374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary
embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and
scintigraphy. Radiology1996; 200:699
-706[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, et al. Central pulmonary
thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the
single-breath-hold techniquecomparison with pulmonary angiography.
Radiology1992; 185:381
-387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK, et al. Subsegmental
pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row
spiral CT. Radiology2002; 222:483
-490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Patel S, Kazerooni EA, Cascade PN. Pulmonary embolism: optimization
of small artery visualization at multi-detector row CT.
Radiology2003; 227:455
-460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Raptopoulos V, Boiselle. Multi-detector row spiral CT pulmonary
angiography: comparison with single-detector row spiral CT.
Radiology2001; 221:606
-613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, et al. Peripheral pulmonary
arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol.
Radiology1997; 204:157
-163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Remy-Jardin M, Baghaie F, Bonnel F, et al. Thoracic helical CT:
influence of subsecond scan time and thin collimation on evaluation of
peripheral pulmonary arteries. Eur Radiol2000; 10:1297
-1303[Medline]
- Garg K. CT of pulmonary thromboembolic disease. Radiol
Clin North Am 2002;40:111
-122.[Medline]
- Richman PB, Courtney DM, Friese J, et al. Chest CT angiography
(CTA) to rule-out pulmonary embolism (PE) frequently reveals clinically
significant ancillary findings: a multi-center study of 1025 emergency
department patients. (abstr) Acad Emerg Med2003; 10:564
-565
- Garg K, Macey L. Helical CT scanning in the diagnosis of pulmonary
embolism. Respiration2003; 70:231
-237[Medline]
- Nilsson T, Olausson A, Johnsson H, et al. Negative spiral CT in
acute pulmonary embolism. Acta Radiol2002; 43:486
-491[Medline]
- Bourriot K, Couffinhal T, Bernard V, et al. Clinical outcome after
a negative spiral CT pulmonary angiographic finding in an inpatient population
from cardiology and pneumology wards. Chest2003; 123:359
-365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Swensen SJ, Sheedy PF, Ryu JH, et al. Outcomes after withholding
anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and
negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clin
Proc 2002;77:130
-138[Medline]
- Donato AA, Scheirer JJ, Atwell MS, et al. Clinical outcomes in
patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative helical computed
tomographic results in whom anticoagulation was withheld. Arch
Intern Med 2003;163:2033
-2038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, Asaad J. CT pulmonary angiography:
a comparative analysis of the utilization patterns in emergency department and
hospitalized patients between 1998 and 2003. AJR2004; 183:1093
-1096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- McCollough CH, Zink FE. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT
system. Med Phys1999; 26:2223
-2230[Medline]
- Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, et al. Four multidetector-row helical CT on
image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology2000; 215:55
-62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The
essential physics of medical imaging, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA:
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002:342
-369
- Novelline RA, Baltarowich OH, Athanasoulls CA, et al. The clinical
course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative pulmonary
arteriogram. Radiology1978; 126:561
-567[Abstract]
- Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and
validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism.
Circulation1992; 85:462
-468[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Henry JW, Relyea B, Stein PD, et al. Continuing risk of
thromboemboli among patients with normal pulmonary angiograms.
Chest 1995;107:1375
-1378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Oser RF, Zuckerman DA, Gutierrez FR, et al. Anatomic distribution
of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross sectional
imaging. Radiology1996; 199:31
-35[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, DeRosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism:
clinical outcomes in the international cooperative pulmonary embolism registry
(ICOPER). Lancet1999; 353:1386
-1389[Medline]
- Grifoni S, Olivotto I, Cecchini P, et al. Short-term clinical
outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and
echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction.
Circulation2000; 101:2817
-2822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Podbregar M, Krivec B, Voga G. Impact of morphologic
characteristics of central pulmonary thromboemboli in massive pulmonary
embolism. Chest2002; 122:973
-979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wood KE. Major pulmonary embolism: a review of a pathophysiologic
approach to the golden hour of hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism.
Chest 2002;121:877
-905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Stein PD, Henry JW. Clinical characteristics of patients with acute
pulmonary embolism stratified according to their presenting syndromes.
Chest 1997;112:974
-979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wu AS, Pezzullo JA, Cronan JJ, et al. CT pulmonary angiography:
quantification of pulmonary embolus as a predictor of patient
outcomeinitial experience. Radiology2004; 230:831
-835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Iorio A, Guercini F, Pini M. Low-molecular-weight heparin for the
long-term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: meta-analysis of
the randomized comparisons with oral anticoagulants. J Thromb
Haemost 2003;1:1906
-1913[Medline]
- Sjalander A, Engstrom G, Berntorp E. Risk of haemorrhagic stroke in
patients with oral anticoagulation compared with the general population.
(abstr) J Intern Med2003; 254:434
-438[Medline]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Roggenland, S. A. Peters, S. P. Lemburg, T. Holland-Letz, V. Nicolas, and C. M. Heyer
CT Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Impact of Patient Characteristics and Different Venous Lines on Vessel Enhancement and Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
June 1, 2008;
190(6):
W351 - W359.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Heyer, P. S. Mohr, S. P. Lemburg, S. A. Peters, and V. Nicolas
Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Pulmonary CT Angiography with 100- or 120-kVp Protocol: Prospective Randomized Study
Radiology,
November 1, 2007;
245(2):
577 - 583.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R Desai
Unsuspected pulmonary embolism on CT scanning: yet another headache for clinicians?
Thorax,
June 1, 2007;
62(6):
470 - 472.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K Hogg, G Brown, J Dunning, J Wright, S Carley, B Foex, and K Mackway-Jones
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with CT pulmonary angiography: a systematic review
Emerg. Med. J.,
March 1, 2006;
23(3):
172 - 178.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|