AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 184:1245-1246
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

Intraaortic Balloon Pump Location and Aortic Dissection

Lynne M. Hurwitz and Philip C. Goodman

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.

Received June 17, 2004; accepted after revision July 22, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to L. M. Hurwitz (hurwi001{at}mc.duke.edu).


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Discussion
References
 
A 72-year-old woman with hyperlipidemia and hypertension presented with epigastric discomfort that radiated substernally and increased with exercise. Initial evaluation revealed a new left bundle branch block. Subsequent cardiac catheterization showed a 95% stenosis in the left anterior descending artery and an ejection fraction of 30-40%. The patient was admitted to the cardiac ICU where symptoms and laboratory data of on-going myocardial ischemia were observed.

The admission chest radiograph (Fig. 1A) showed the heart to be at the upper limits of normal in size. The remainder of the chest was normal. While in the cardiac ICU, the patient became hypotensive. An intraaortic balloon pump (9.5F, 40-mL balloon [DL, Datascope]) was placed without difficulty and its location was confirmed using fluoroscopy. Normal function was noted with 1:1 augmentation in systole, and the patient's hypotension improved.



View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 72-year-old woman with hyperlipidemia and hypertension presented with epigastric discomfort that radiated substernally and increased with exercise. Admission posteroanterior chest radiograph shows heart size and shape are within normal limits. Lungs, mediastinum, pleural spaces, and bones are also normal.

 

A follow-up chest radiograph (Fig. 1B) showed the intraaortic balloon pump with its tip approximately 3 cm below the top of the aortic arch, overlying the lateral aortic wall. Because the patient complained of abdominal pain, a CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was obtained to look for a retroperitoneal hematoma or ischemic bowel. The CT images showed extensive atherosclerotic disease and a Stanford B type dissection of the aorta. The intraaortic balloon pump was seen within the false lumen (Figs. 1C and 1D). The catheter was subsequently removed without immediate complications. A three-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting procedure was performed without complication the next day, and the patient was discharged from the hospital without further intervention.



View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 72-year-old woman with hyperlipidemia and hypertension presented with epigastric discomfort that radiated substernally and increased with exercise. Anteroposterior supine chest radiograph obtained 6 hr after admission shows intraaortic balloon pump with tip of balloon pump located laterally along wall of descending thoracic aorta.

 


View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 72-year-old woman with hyperlipidemia and hypertension presented with epigastric discomfort that radiated substernally and increased with exercise. Contrast-enhanced CT scan of mid thorax 1 day after admission shows type B Stanford dissection and radiopaque intraaortic balloon pump tip within false lumen.

 


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 72-year-old woman with hyperlipidemia and hypertension presented with epigastric discomfort that radiated substernally and increased with exercise. Contrast-enhanced CT scan of upper abdomen 1 day after admission shows gas in catheter balloon (arrow) lateral to intimal calcification.

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Discussion
References
 
Intraaortic balloon pumps are used to improve coronary artery perfusion in patients with acute cardiac decompensation resulting from myocardial infarction [1]. When distended in diastole, the balloon causes increased pressure in the proximal aorta, thus improving coronary artery perfusion; increased oxygenation of the myocardium; and improved cardiac output. Forced deflation during systole decreases cardiac afterload, resulting in decreased left ventricular work and oxygen requirements. The device used in this case has a 26-cm-long balloon that inflates with 30-50 cm3 of gas. At the tip of this catheter is an approximately 1-cm metallic marker that is visible on radiographs or fluoroscopy and is used to ensure proper placement—ideally, just distal to the left subclavian artery. If the balloon pump is too proximal in the aorta, occlusion of the brachiocephalic, left carotid, or left subclavian arteries may occur. If the catheter is too distal, the celiac, superior mesenteric, or renal arteries may be obstructed.

Complications of intraaortic balloon pump placement are seen in 8-29% of procedures and include limb ischemia, aortic dissection, mesenteric ischemia, renal insufficiency, neurologic complications, thrombocytopenia, bleeding, and infection [2, 3]. Most problems are vascular. Independent risk factors for vascular complications include female sex, diabetes, cigarette smoking, peripheral vascular disease, and the prior use of antiplatelet drugs [3, 4]. Aortic dissection occurs in 1-4% of intraaortic balloon pump insertions [3, 5]. In general, catheter insertion into a false lumen will lead to poor intraaortic balloon pump function. However, there is a report of a balloon pump functioning normally from within the false channel presumably by transmitting pressure across the intimal flap [5].

Chest radiographs are commonly obtained to evaluate the position of an intraaortic balloon pump. Ideally, the tip is positioned approximately 2-4 cm below the level of the aortic arch. Usually, this assessment is adequate; however, as shown in this case, attention to the relationship of the tip to the aortic wall may provide a clue to a misplaced intraaortic balloon pump. Lateral positioning of an intraaortic balloon pump was previously reported in a patient with the catheter in the aortic wall [6]. Our report is the first to document the malpositioned catheter on CT.

The chest radiographic findings of aortic dissection have been well described in the literature [7-10] and include interval enlargement of the aorta, greater than 6-mm displacement of intimal calcification from the adventitial border on the lateral radiograph, rightward displacement of the trachea, and double contour of the aortic arch. These findings are either rare or nonspecific and thus prospective detection of aortic dissection on chest radiography is limited to approximately 25% of cases [11]. The diagnosis may be made successfully with CT, transesophageal echocardiography, and MRI.

This case illustrates the benefit of clinical and radiographic correlation. The location of the intraaortic balloon pump within the false lumen usually manifests clinically with poor augmentation; however, this does not always happen, as in this case. One should be alert to the possibility of a misplaced intraaortic balloon pump if the tip consistently overlies the lateral aspect of the aorta on chest radiographs. Be aware however that a balloon catheter malpositioned in the ventral or dorsal aortic wall would not necessarily appear abnormally placed on posteroanterior or anteroposterior chest radiographs.


References
Top
Introduction
Discussion
References
 

  1. Waksman R, Weiss AT, Gotsman MS, Hasin Y. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation improves survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J1993; 14:71 -74[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Beckman CB, Geha AS, Hammond GL, Baue AE. Results and complications of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation. Ann Thorac Surg 1977;24:550 -559[Abstract]
  3. Meco M, Gramegna G, Yassini A, et al. Mortality and morbidity from intra-aortic balloon pumps: risks analysis. J Cardiovasc Surg 2002;43:17 -23[Medline]
  4. Iverson L, Herfindahl G, Ecker R, et al. Vascular complications of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation. Am J Surg1987; 154:99 -102[Medline]
  5. Jacobs LE, Fraifeld M, Kitler MN, Ioli AW. Aortic dissection following intraaortic balloon insertion: recognition by transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J1992; 124:536 -540[Medline]
  6. Hyson E, Ravin CE, Kelley M, Curtis A. Intraaortic counterpulsation balloon: radiographic considerations. AJR1977; 128:915 -918[Abstract]
  7. Petasnick JP. Radiologic evaluation of aortic dissection. Radiology1991; 180:297 -305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Earnest F, Muhm JR, Sheedy PE. Roentgenographic findings in thoracic aortic dissection. Mayo Clin Proc1979; 54:43 -50[Medline]
  9. Beachley MC, Ranniger K, Roth FJ. Roentgenographic evaluation of dissecting aneurysms of the aorta. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1974;121:617 -625[Medline]
  10. Chen JTT. Plain radiographic evaluation of the aorta. J Thorac Imaging 1990;5:1 -17
  11. Luker GD, Glazer HS, Eagar G, Guiterrez FR, Sagel SS. Aortic dissection: effect of prospective chest radiographic diagnosis on delay to definitive diagnosis. Radiology1994; 193:813 -819[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS