|
|
||||||||
Case Report |
Unitas Interventional Unit, Centurion, PO Box 14031, Lyttelton 0140, South Africa.
Received May 14, 2004;
accepted after revision July 20, 2004.
Address correspondence to I. C. Duncan
(docdunc{at}iafrica.com).
Introduction
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A CT scan obtained on day 1 showed hemorrhage within and adjacent to the left central sulcus (Fig. 1A). An unenhanced MR image obtained on day 2 showed edema in the adjacent precentral and postcentral gyri and underlying white matter (Fig. 1B). There was no sagittal sinus thrombosis noted on MR venography; however, on the cerebral surface adjacent to the affected area of the brain was a prominent blood vessel initially reported as showing a flow void by virtue of its hypointense appearance on T2-weighted images (Fig. 1C). The same vessel was seen to be isointense with brain on unenhanced T1-weighted images. Gadolinium was not administered.
|
|
|
Due to the suspicion of the presence of a high-flow vascular malformation as the cause of the bleed, cerebral digital subtraction arteriography was performed; these images did not show any pial arteriovenous shunt but did show a small dural fistula to the left of the midline in the frontoparietal region filling from a single branch of the anterior division of the left middle meningeal artery (Fig. 1D). The patient was then referred 1 week later to our unit for embolization of this dural shunt.
|
During the initial repeat cerebral arteriography, the dural shunt was now no longer seen, but a selective left internal carotid arteriogram showed a strip of venous congestion around the left paracentral region (Fig. 1E). No sinus thrombosis was seen. A provisional diagnosis of cortical venous thrombosis was made, and treatment was commenced with low-molecular-weight heparin.
|
A second MR image obtained on day 11 showed the enlarged surface vessel to be homogeneously hyperintense on FLAIR unenhanced and T1-weighted images (Figs. 1F and 1G, respectively). Both the hemorrhage and the edema were also seen to be resolving. A retrospective review of an MR image obtained after a similar neurologic episode 2 years earlier showed this same vessel to be a normally enhancing cortical vein, further confirming the diagnosis of a recent isolated cortical vein thrombosis.
|
|
No underlying thombotic disorder was un-covered during further investigation. Treatment consisted of low-molecular-weight heparin initially followed later by conversion to oral warfarin sodium (Lennon-Warfarin, Aspen Pharmacare) therapy. The patient made a complete recovery from her neurologic deficits and remains well 9 months later.
|
|
|---|
From 3 to 7 days after thrombosis, the clot becomes hyperintense on both T1- and T2-weighted images and is thus easier to identify. Analysis of the source images of an MR venogram also may assist in identifying a "missing" cortical vein [5]. Because of the extreme variability of the number and position of the cortical veins, isolated cortical vein thrombosisthat is, nonfilling of a cortical veinmay be missed during cerebral catheter angiography. However, what may be seen, as in our patient, is focal venous congestion and collateral venous pathways, a localized form of the so-called "pseudophlebitic pattern" [5].
Focal intracerebral hemorrhages can be caused by a number of underlying abnormalities including intracranial vascular malformations (arteriovenous malformation, cavernous malformation), dural arteriovenous fistula, hemorrhage associated with infarctions or tumors, cerebral arteritis, aneurysm rupture, and dural sinus thrombosis. Some hemorrhages may result from underlying hypertension, coagulopathy, infection, or trauma, whereas others are deemed "idiopathic" or "of undetermined cause." Because of the difficulty in diagnosing isolated cortical vein thrombosis, some of the so-called idiopathic cases may well be caused by this problem. MRI is useful in identifying vascular malformations, infarctions, or tumors, and MR angiography is able to detect aneurysms, vasculitis, and dural sinus thrombosis. Certain abnormalities may not be detected by either CT or MRI, thereby requiring conventional angiography for their exclusion. These include subtle vasculitic changes, very small arteriovenous malformations, and some dural arteriovenous shunts.
Of further interest in our case was the transient development of a small dural arteriovenous fistula in the vicinity of the thrombosed vein. There is a known association between the presence of cerebral venous thrombosis and the development of a dural shunt. The theory is that the induction of a dural shunt may be triggered by an event that promotes angiogenesis within the dura such as infection, trauma, and venous thrombosis [6]. Conversely, spontaneous occlusion of an existing dural shunt may also occur due to thrombosis of its venous outlet and retrograde extension of the thrombus into the shunt vessels. This thrombosis may, however, result in the development of new neurologic signs or intracranial hemorrhage either because of venous occlusion or due to the diversion of flow into cortical veins in partially thrombosed shunts.
Although we cannot be certain, we suspect that the dural shunt in our case was temporarily induced by the development of the thrombosis rather than being a preexisting dural shunt that spontaneously thrombosed. We believe this mainly because this shunt regressed spontaneously within 1 week despite the persistence of the cortical vein thrombosis and because there was no evidence of enlargement of the feeding meningeal artery to suggest a longer-standing preexisting dural shunt.
In conclusion, isolated cortical venous thrombosis may be difficult to diagnose both clinically and radiologically. MRI features may be difficult to identify, particularly in the acute stages of thrombosis and especially when associated indirect signs are absent. A high index of clinical suspicion and the appropriate use and careful analysis of sectional imaging or angiography (or both) are essential in confirming this diagnosis.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Boukobza, I. Crassard, M.G. Bousser, and H. Chabriat MR Imaging Features of Isolated Cortical Vein Thrombosis: Diagnosis and Follow-Up AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2009; 30(2): 344 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Idbaih, M. Boukobza, I. Crassard, R. Porcher, M.-G. Bousser, and H. Chabriat MRI of Clot in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: High Diagnostic Value of Susceptibility-Weighted Images Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 991 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |