AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bordalo-Rodrigues, M.
Right arrow Articles by Barakat, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bordalo-Rodrigues, M.
Right arrow Articles by Barakat, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 184:1464-1469
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Lunate Chondromalacia: Evaluation of Routine MRI Sequences

Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues1,2, Mark Schweitzer1, Diane Bergin3, Randall Culp4 and Mohamed S. Barakat1

1 Department of Radiology, Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute, Bernard Aronson Plaza, 301 E 17th St., 6th Fl., New York, NY 10003.
2 Present Address: Radiology Department, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Av. Eneas de Carvalho de Aguiar, 255, 05403-001, São Paulo, Brazil.
3 Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Philadelphia Hand Center, King of Prussia, PA.

Received February 25, 2004; accepted after revision September 13, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to M. Bordalo-Rodrigues.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Chondromalacia is a commonly encountered abnormality at arthroscopy and may be responsible for significant clinical symptoms and disability. In the wrist, the most common location for chondromalacia is the lunate bone. Consequently, we sought to study the accuracy of clinical MRI in the assessment of lunate articular cartilage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR images of 34 patients who underwent arthroscopy and had an MRI examination within 1 month of surgery were evaluated by two reviewers for the presence and location of lunate cartilage defects and subchondral edema.

RESULTS. Lunate cartilage defects were seen on MRI in 10 of the 13 patients with chondromalacia, but these defects were also incorrectly noted in three of 21 of patients without chondromalacia. The visible locations for cartilage defects were the ulnar aspect of the proximal lunate bone (n = 3), radial aspect of the proximal lunate bone (n = 4), ulnar aspect of the distal lunate bone (n = 2), and radial aspect of the distal lunate bone (n = 1). Subchondral marrow edema was observed in six of the 10 patients with chondromalacia seen on MRI; in all six patients, the edema was seen in the same quadrant as the cartilage defect. Marrow edema was detected in one patient without chondromalacia.

CONCLUSION. We conclude that lunate chondromalacia can be accurately assessed using routine MRI sequences, although there are occasional false-positive interpretations.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Chondromalacia is an abnormality commonly encountered at arthroscopy and may be responsible for significant clinical symptoms and disability [1]. Cartilage defects can be caused by acute injury, overuse, or degeneration [2, 3]. In addition, adjacent ligament injuries can lead to focal cartilage loss [4, 5]. A number of surgical techniques for cartilage repair have been developed including abrasion, drilling, microfracture, autologous osteochondral transfer, and autologous chondrocyte implantation [69]. Also, there are promising future pharmaceutical interventions to address chondromalacia [10].

Because clinical assessment gives little information about the integrity of articular cartilage [11], a major obstacle to the study of chondromalacia has been the lack of a reliable noninvasive method by which to directly assess the integrity of the articular cartilage [12]. Much of the ongoing work in this area involves in vitro studies [1315]. Few in vivo studies on MRI of articular cartilage in joints other than the knee, ankle, or temporomandibular joints have been performed [1618]. In the wrist, the most common location for hyaline cartilage defects is the lunate bone [19]. Consequently, we sought to study the accuracy of clinical MRI in the assessment of lunate chondromalacia.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Study Population
After receiving approval from the institutional review board, with a waiver of specific informed consent for this retrospective study, we evaluated 34 patients who underwent arthroscopy and MRI within 1 month of surgery. The age range of these patients was 13–57 years, and the mean age was 36 years. The study group was composed of 18 males and 16 females. Arthroscopy was indicated if clinical or radiologic evidence of internal derangement or a cartilage lesion was present. Surgery in all patients was performed by a single board-certified orthopedic hand surgeon with 12 years of experience who was not blinded to the initial MR interpretations.

Operative reports were reviewed for the presence and location of lunate chondromalacia and also for the frequency with which cartilage loss was related to an adjacent internal derangement, including triangular fibrocartilaginous complex, scapholunate ligament, and lunotriquetral interosseus ligament abnormalities.

We did not directly assess MR images for the presence of triangular fibrocartilaginous complex, scapholunate ligament, or lunotriquetral interosseus ligament tears; instead, we evaluated the surgical diagnosis of a tear in comparison with the MR diagnosis of cartilage defects because the latter was the focus of this study.

Imaging
Imaging was performed on 1.5-T superconducting magnets (Signa, GE Healthcare) using dedicated wrist coils.

Several pulse sequences were used. Coronal spin-echo T1-weighted (TR range/TE range, 400–600/9–20; number of excitations, 2; matrix size, 256 x 192; slice thickness, 3 mm; interslice gap, 1 mm; field of view, 10 cm), coronal fast spin-echo proton density–weighted (TR/TE, 4,000/40; echo-train length, 8; number of excitations, 2; matrix size, 256 x 256; slice thickness, 3 mm; interslice gap, 1 mm; field of view, 10 cm), and coronal 3D gradient-echo (45/10; number of excitations, 2; flip angle, 10–20°; matrix size, 256 x 128; slice thickness, 1.2 mm; interslice gap, 0 mm; field of view, 10 cm) sequences were performed. In addition, axial spin-echo T1-weighted sequences (TR range/TE range, 400–600/9–20; number of excitations, 2; matrix size, 256 x 192; slice thickness, 3 mm; interslice gap, 1 mm; field of view, 10 cm) and axial fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences with fat saturation (TR/TE range, 2,500/60–80; echo-train length, 16; number of excitations, 4; matrix size, 256 x 256; slice thickness, 3 mm; interslice gap, 1 mm; field of view, 10 cm) were performed.

In 24 patients, indirect MR arthrography was performed. The protocol was identical except that an additional axial spin-echo T1-weighted fat-suppressed postcontrast sequence (5 min delay after contrast injection) was performed initially. Coronal T1-weighted images were therefore indirect arthrograms.

In nine patients, coronal fast spin-echo T2-weighted images with fat saturation (TR/TE range, 2,500/60–80; echo-train length, 16; number of excitations, 4; matrix size, 256 x 256; slice thickness, 3 mm; interslice gap, 1 mm; field of view, 10 cm) were obtained instead of coronal fast spin-echo proton density–weighted images.

Image Analysis
Two experienced musculoskeletal radiologist reviewers who were blinded to the initial MR interpretations, surgical results, and patient demographics evaluated in consensus the images for the presence of lunate chondromalacia. Chondromalacia was defined as focal disruption of the normal hyaline cartilage signal intensity. In addition, the location of the cartilage defects—dividing the lunate bone into proximal and distal radial and ulnar aspects—was noted (Fig. 1). The scapholunate surface was considered proximal radial, and the lunotriquetral interosseus surface was considered proximal ulnar. Also, note was made as to whether any localized subchondral bone marrow edema, whether cystic or ill-defined, was present even when no cartilage defect was seen. If the cartilage loss appeared as though it might involve more than one segment, only the dominant segment was scored. There was no independent sequence-to-sequence evaluation. Because of the subtlety of the abnormalities and because this was a pilot study, we believe a global assessment is more useful.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Drawing shows lunate was divided in four regions to determine cartilage defects location: 1, distal ulnar aspect; 2, proximal ulnar aspect; 3, proximal radial aspect; and 4, distal radial aspect.

 

Statistical Analysis
A finding was considered true-positive only if the MRI abnormality was localized at the exact same location as the visualized arthroscopic defect.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy with 95% confidence intervals for the detection of lunate chondromalacia were calculated. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the correlation of lunate chondromalacia with the presence of each type of ligament and triangular fibrocartilaginous complex tear. Surgical reports were used as the standard of reference for the diagnosis of lunate chondromalacia and determining whether scapholunate ligament, lunotriquetral interosseus ligament, or triangular fibrocartilaginous complex tears were present.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Thirteen (38%) of the 34 wrists had chondromalacia of the lunate bone at arthroscopy.

On MRI, chondromalacia was seen in 10 of the 13 patients with chondromalacia; however, MR findings were interpreted as showing chondromalacia in three of 21 patients without chondromalacia (false-positive findings).

The locations for chondromalacia seen on MRI were the ulnar aspect of the proximal lunate (n = 3), radial aspect of the proximal lunate (n = 4) (Fig. 2A, 2B, 2C), ulnar aspect of the distal lunate (n = 2), and radial aspect of the distal lunate (n = 1). The three false-positive MR interpretations were in the radial aspect of the proximal lunate (n = 2) (Fig. 3A, 3B) and ulnar aspect of the proximal lunate (n = 1).



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. Indirect MR arthrogram in 40-year-old woman with arthroscopic and MR evidence of lunate chondromalacia. Coronal fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 2,500/70) shows cartilage defect (arrowhead) and adjacent bone marrow edema (white arrows). Scapholunate ligament (black arrow) is thickened with abnormal high signal intensity within it. Scapholunate ligament tear was confirmed at surgery.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. Indirect MR arthrogram in 40-year-old woman with arthroscopic and MR evidence of lunate chondromalacia. Coronal 3D gradient-echo MR image (TR/TE, 45/12; flip angle, 10°) shows cartilage defect in lunate (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. Indirect MR arthrogram in 40-year-old woman with arthroscopic and MR evidence of lunate chondromalacia. Arthroscopic image of proximal radial aspect of lunate shows full-thickness chondral defect (arrow).

 


View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. Coronal MR images from false-positive examination in 50-year-old man. T1-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 400/9) shows ill-defined area of low signal intensity in proximal radial aspect of lunate (arrows).

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. Coronal MR images from false-positive examination in 50-year-old man. T2-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 2,500/70) shows ill-defined area of high signal intensity in proximal radial aspect of lunate (arrows), interpreted as edema secondary to chondromalacia. At surgery, these signal abnormalities were noted to be cystic changes of lunate bone, with no focal cartilage lesion associated.

 

There were three false-negative MR examinations. At arthroscopy, minor proximal cartilage fraying in the ulnar aspect of the proximal lunate was noted in two cases and in the radial aspect of the proximal lunate in one case (Fig. 4).



View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. 54-year-old woman with false-negative MRI study. Three-dimensional coronal gradient-echo MR image (TR/TE, 45/10; flip angle, 10°) shows regular chondral surface of proximal lunate (arrowheads). Minor arthritic changes of proximal radial aspect of lunate were seen at arthroscopy. Surgically confirmed scapholunate ligament tear (arrow) was noted.

 

Ill-defined subchondral marrow edema was observed in six of the 10 patients with chondromalacia seen on MRI; in all six patients, the edema was in the same location as the cartilage defect. None of the three patients with false-negative MR findings for chondromalacia had subchondral edema. Also, ill-defined bone marrow edema was detected in one patient with a false-positive MR study (Fig. 3A, 3B).

Triangular fibrocartilaginous complex tears were seen at surgery in six patients with chondromalacia, scapholunate ligament tears in three patients with chondromalacia, and lunotriquetral interosseus ligament tears in three patients with chondromalacia. These frequencies are similar to those of the patients without chondromalacia (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Correlation of Lunate Chondromalacia with Type of Ligament Tear or Triangular Fibrocartilaginous Complex Tear

 

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MRI for visible cartilage defects are provided in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value, and Accuracy of MRI for the Detection of Lunate Chondromalacia with Arthroscopy as the Standard

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Damage to hyaline cartilage occurs with trauma and inflammatory arthritis, but is most often degenerative [12]. Degeneration of cartilage is an irreversible process because cartilage cannot directly regenerate [20]. Despite the inability of cartilage defects to heal, visualization of cartilage defects is important for identifying the cause of a patient's symptoms, determining a patient's prognosis, and planning surgery [12].

The most frequent location for hyaline cartilage loss in the carpal bones is the lunate bone because of its biomechanical centrality [19]. According to several theories proposed to explain wrist motion [2124], the lunate bone is an intercalated segment between the scaphoid and triquetral bones and between the radius and capitate bones (Fig. 5). In intrinsic intercarpal ligament dysfunction, nonsynchronous motion between and within the carpal rows may result in carpal instability and, consequently, in osteoarthritis [25, 26]. However, in our population there was no statistical association of lunate chondromalacia with surgically proven ligament tears. This result was likely seen because of the limited number of cases studied. End-stage triangular fibrocartilaginous complex tears can result in ulnar impaction on the lunate bone especially with positive ulnar variance [27]. Because MRI is not performed in the position to evaluate for ulnar variance, this assessment was not made in our study. All these mechanical disorders can lead to lunate chondromalacia. We found a fairly high incidence of lunate chondromalacia in our population. This finding is likely related to the strong interest of our referring hand surgeon in cartilage loss.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Schematic drawing of wrist joint shows that lunate acts as intercalated segment, interposed between radius and capitate. Flexion and extension motions are accomplished by radiolunate and lunocapitate joints. Scaphoid and intercarpal ligaments prevents this unstable arrangement from collapse when compression forces are applied. (Reprinted with permission from [23]).

 

Lunate cartilage loss is in the clinical differential diagnosis for both radial- and ulnar-sided wrist pain. Because of the mechanics and clinical importance, lunate chondromalacia was chosen for evaluation in this pilot study. We found that chondromalacia of the lunate bone predominates proximally. All cases of chondromalacia accompanying triangular fibrocartilaginous complex tears were seen proximally, almost equally divided between radial and ulnar sides. In other parts of the body, cartilage loss is seen in association with ligament injuries [4, 28]. However, we found no association with specific internal derangements.

Although MRI was surprisingly accurate for the detection of chondromalacia, especially in the region of the proximal lunate, we missed a quarter of these lesions, usually minor ones. We also had a 14% false-positive rate, which was probably related to the hypersensitivity of the reviewers and the focused nature of this study.

We did not objectively compare sequences as the patients were assessed globally. Also, indirect MR arthrography and coronal T2-weighted imaging were not performed in all patients. However, our subjective impression is that the proton density–weighted images and indirect arthrographic images showed cartilage defects best.

Bone marrow edema has been suggested to be a predictive sign of worsening of chondropathy in osteoarthritis of the knee [29]. Another study of the frequency and spectrum of abnormalities in the bone marrow of the wrist postulated that 34% of cases were attributed to focal osteoarthritis [30]. In our study, ill-defined marrow edema was seen in half of all cases of lunate chondromalacia. However, in one false-positive case, ill-defined marrow edema seen on the MR study corresponded to cystic changes at surgery, with no overlying chondromalacia.

We acknowledge several limitations to this study. First, this study was retrospective. Second, although our images were typical of clinical high-field-strength images, certain proposed cartilage-specific sequences such as 3D double-echo steady state [31] and spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state [32] were not performed. Third, because of our fairly rigid inclusion criteria, a limited population was studied.

We conclude that lunate chondromalacia can be accurately assessed by typical high-field-strength MRI sequences, although detection of early changes is limited and there is a modest false-positive rate.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG. Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy1997; 13:456 –460[Medline]
  2. Quinn TM, Allen RG, Schalet BJ, Perumbuli P, Hunziker EB. Matrix and cell injury due to subimpact loading of adult bovine articular cartilage explants: effects of strain rate and peak stress. J Orthop Res 2001;19:242 –249[Medline]
  3. Stabler A, Heuck A, Reiser M. Imaging of the hand: degeneration, impingement and overuse. Eur J Radiol1997; 25:118 –128[Medline]
  4. Lahm A, Erggelet C, Steinwachs M, Reichelt A. Articular and osseous lesions in recent ligament tears: arthroscopic changes compared with magnetic resonance imaging findings. Arthroscopy1998; 14:597 –604[Medline]
  5. Johnson DL, Urban WP Jr, Caborn DN, Vanarthos WJ, Carlson CS. Articular cartilage changes seen with magnetic resonance imaging-detected bone bruises associated with acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med1998; 26:409 –414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ. Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop 2001;[391 suppl]:S362 –S369
  7. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Szerb I, Udvarhelyi I. Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects: a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1997;5:262 –267[Medline]
  8. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med1994; 331:889 –895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Convery FR, Meyers MH, Akeson WH. Fresh osteochondral allografting of the femoral condyle. Clin Orthop1991; 273:139 –145
  10. Boutron I, Tubach F, Giraudeau B, Ravaud P. Methodological differences in clinical trials evaluating nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments of hip and knee osteoarthritis. JAMA 2003;290:1062 –1070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Felson DT. The course of osteoarthritis and factors that affect it. Rheum Dis Clin North Am1993; 19:607 –615[Medline]
  12. McCauley TR, Disler DG. MR imaging of articular cartilage. Radiology1998; 209:629 –640[Free Full Text]
  13. van der Linden E, Kroon HM, Doornbos J, Hermans J, Bloem JL. MR imaging of hyaline cartilage at 0.5 T: a quantitative and qualitative in vitro evaluation of three types of sequences. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27:297 –305[Medline]
  14. Waldschmidt JG, Rilling RJ, Kajdacsy-Balla AA, Boynton MD, Erickson SJ. In vitro and in vivo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: zonal anatomy, imaging pitfalls, and pathologic conditions. RadioGraphics1997; 17:1387 –1402[Abstract]
  15. Chandnani VP, Ho C, Chu P, Trudell D, Resnick D. Knee hyaline cartilage evaluated with MR imaging: a cadaveric study involving multiple imaging sequences and intraarticular injection of gadolinium and saline solution. Radiology1991; 178:557 –561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sowers MF, Hayes C, Jamadar D, et al. Magnetic resonance-detected subchondral bone marrow and cartilage defect characteristics associated with pain and X-ray-defined knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003;11:387 –393[Medline]
  17. Ba-Ssalamah A, Schibany N, Puig S, Herneth AM, Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Trattnig S. Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:209 –216[Medline]
  18. Emshoff R, Brandlmaier I, Bertram S, Rudisch A. Relative odds of temporomandibular joint pain as a function of magnetic resonance imaging findings of internal derangement, osteoarthrosis, effusion, and bone marrow edema. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:437 –445[Medline]
  19. Fortems Y, de Smet L, Fabry G. Cartilaginous and ligamentous degeneration of the wrist: anatomic study. Ann Chir Main Memb Super 1994;13:383 –386[Medline]
  20. Buckwalter JA, Mow VC. Cartilage repair in osteoarthritis. In: Moskowitz RW, Howell DS, Goldberg VM, Mankin HJ, eds. Osteoarthritis. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders,1992 : 71–107
  21. Taleisnik J. The ligaments of the wrist. J Hand Surg Am 1976;1:110 –118[Medline]
  22. Lichtman DM, Schneider JR, Swafford AR, Mack GR. Ulnar midcarpal instability: clinical and laboratory analysis. J Hand Surg Am 1981;6:515 –523[Medline]
  23. Kauer JM, de Lang A. The carpal joint: anatomy and function. Hand Clin 1987;3:23 –29[Medline]
  24. Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH, Beabout JW, Bryan RS. Traumatic instability of the wrist: diagnosis, classification, and pathomechanics. J Bone Joint Surg Am1972; 54:1612 –1632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Tang JB, Ryu J, Omokawa S, Wearden S. Wrist kinetics after scapholunate dissociation: the effect of scapholunate interosseous ligament injury and persistent scapholunate gaps. J Orthop Res2002; 20:215 –221[Medline]
  26. Ruby LK, An KN, Linscheid RL, Cooney WP 3rd, Chao EY. The effect of scapholunate ligament section on scapholunate motion. J Hand Surg Am 1987;12:767 –771[Medline]
  27. Imaeda T, Nakamura R, Shionoya K, Makino N. Ulnar impaction syndrome: MR imaging findings. Radiology1996; 201:495 –500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Feeney MS, O'Dowd J, Kay EW, Colville J. Glenohumeral articular cartilage changes in rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12:20 –23[Medline]
  29. Pessis E, Drape JL, Ravaud P, Chevrot A, Dougados M, Ayral X. Assessment of progression in knee osteoarthritis: results of a 1 year study comparing arthroscopy and MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003;11:361 –369[Medline]
  30. Alam F, Schweitzer ME, Li XX, Malat J, Hussain SM. Frequency and spectrum of abnormalities in the bone marrow of the wrist: MR imaging findings. Skeletal Radiol1999; 28:312 –317[Medline]
  31. Ruehm S, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J. MRI of patellar articular cartilage: evaluation of an optimized gradient echo sequence (3D-DESS). J Magn Reson Imaging1998; 8:1246 –1251[Medline]
  32. Disler DG. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage. AJR1997; 169:1117 –1123[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Saupe, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. R. Schmid, T. Schertler, M. Manestar, and D. Weishaupt
MR Imaging of Cartilage in Cadaveric Wrists: Comparison between Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T and Gross Pathologic Inspection
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 180 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bordalo-Rodrigues, M.
Right arrow Articles by Barakat, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bordalo-Rodrigues, M.
Right arrow Articles by Barakat, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS