AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 184:1563-1571
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

Functional MR Cholangiography: Diagnosis of Functional Abnormalities of the Gallbladder and Biliary Tree

Laura M. Fayad1, Ihab R. Kamel1, Donald G. Mitchell2 and David A. Bluemke1

1 Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 601 N Wolfe St., JHOC 3171C, Baltimore, MD 21287.
2 Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.

Received June 8, 2004; accepted after revision October 6, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to L. M. Fayad (lfayad1{at}jhmi.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Technique
Comparison with Other Techniques
Conclusion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to describe the technique and utility of functional MR cholangiography (fMRC) in the evaluation of the gallbladder and biliary tree.

CONCLUSION. FMRC has the potential to provide a comprehensive examination for the anatomic and functional assessment of the gallbladder and biliary tree. Complex anatomic abnormalities and functional disorders can be shown by fMRC, including biliary obstruction and extravasation.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Technique
Comparison with Other Techniques
Conclusion
References
 
Functional MR cholangiography (fMRC) is an emerging technique that has the potential to provide a comprehensive evaluation for the anatomic and functional assessment of the gallbladder and biliary tree. FMRC is performed with a contrast agent such as mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan, Nycomed Amersham), which is excreted via the biliary system, where it causes T1 shortening of bile [1]. Hence, an fMRC sequence can be performed as a high-resolution T1-weighted 3D gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence. With its intrinsic high signal-to-noise ratio, this sequence affords a smaller pixel size than that achieved by conventional single-shot fast spin-echo MRC, sonography, and scinitigraphy. As such, not only can anatomic abnormalities such as strictures, filling defects, and subtle ductal anomalies be detected, but functional abnormalities such as cholecystitis, ductal obstruction, and biliary extravasation can be definitively established. In this pictorial essay, we will discuss the fMRC technique, its advantages over other techniques, and provide examples that illustrate the value of fMRC (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, 5B, 5C, 6A, 6B, 7A, 7B, 7C, 8, 9, 10A, 10B, 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D).



View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 55-year-old woman with acute cholecystitis and metastatic disease to liver. Axial single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) MR cholangiography (MRC) image (TR/TE, infinite/186) shows gallbladder (GB) wall thickening and some distention.

 


View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 55-year-old woman with acute cholecystitis and metastatic disease to liver. Coronal SSFSE MRC image (infinite/190) shows calculus (C) in GB neck.

 


View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 55-year-old woman with acute cholecystitis and metastatic disease to liver. Axial functional MRC image (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) 4 hr after mangafodipir trisodium injection shows contrast agent in common bile duct (CBD). Calculus (C) is again noted in GB neck, but contrast agent has not passed into GB, confirming acute cholecystitis and cystic duct obstruction by calculus. Multiple metastatic liver lesions are present.

 


View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 83-year-old woman with chronic cholecystitis. Precontrast thick-slab single-shot fast spin-echo MR cholangiography (MRC) image (TR/TE, infinite/800) shows distention of gallbladder and gallstones (arrow), features of chronic cholecystitis. Distinction from acute cholecystitis is difficult by conventional MRC images alone.

 


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 83-year-old woman with chronic cholecystitis. Early axial mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced 3D gradient-recalled echo functional MRC (fMRC) image (TR/TE, 6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) performed within 40 min of injection shows contrast agent in duodenum (arrow) but no filling of gallbladder (GB).

 


View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. 83-year-old woman with chronic cholecystitis. At 40 min, coronal fMRC image (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) shows contrast material in duodenum (D) but no filling of gallbladder (GB).

 


View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D. 83-year-old woman with chronic cholecystitis. Two hours later, after injection of morphine sulfate, coronal fMRC image (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) shows contrast agent is present in cystic duct (CD) and gallbladder (GB).

 


View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2E. 83-year-old woman with chronic cholecystitis. Axial fMRC image (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) shows contrast agent in gallbladder layering on nondependent surface (arrow). It is useful to distinguish excretion of contrast agent in gallbladder from native bile. Enhanced bile is recently excreted bile that is not concentrated; it layers on top of concentrated nonenhanced bile.

 


View larger version (190K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 62-year-old woman with chronic cholecystitis. Axial mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced 3D gradient-recalled echo functional MR cholangiography (fMRC) image (TR/TE, 6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) shows contrast agent in common bile duct (CBD) after 20 min. There is no filling of gallbladder (GB).

 


View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 62-year-old woman with chronic cholecystitis. Four hours after injection of contrast material, coronal oblique maximum-intensity-projection image obtained from reconstruction of axial fMRC data set (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) shows contrast agent entering cystic duct (CD) and gallbladder (GB). Contrast agent is present in duodenum (D).

 


View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 66-year-old woman with common bile duct calculi. Axial single-shot fast spin-echo MR cholangiography (MRC) image (TR/TE, infinite/186) obtained after mangafodipir trisodium administration shows low-signal-intensity fluid in common bile duct (CBD), obscuring its evaluation.

 


View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 66-year-old woman with common bile duct calculi. Corresponding axial functional MRC (image (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) shows filling defect (calculus) in CBD surrounded by contrast material. Duodenal contrast material (D) indicates nonobstructing biliary calculus.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A. 68-year-old man with carcinoma of pancreas, metastases to liver, and partial obstruction of common bile duct. Coronal single-shot fast spin-echo MR cholangiography (MRC) image (TR/TE, infinite/186) shows narrowing of common bile duct (CBD) by mass (M). Multiple hepatic lesions are noted, some of which represent metastatic disease.

 


View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B. 68-year-old man with carcinoma of pancreas, metastases to liver, and partial obstruction of common bile duct. Coronal oblique maximum-intensity-projection mangafodipir-enhanced functional MRC (fMRC) image (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) obtained from reconstruction of 3D data set again shows marked narrowing of CBD at level of mass (M). Contrast material is present in duodenum (D) and appeared approximately 4 hr after IV administration. Delayed transit time indicates partial obstruction by mass.

 


View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C. 68-year-old man with carcinoma of pancreas, metastases to liver, and partial obstruction of common bile duct. Axial fMRC image (6/2.2) taken at level of severe ductal narrowing shows contrast in CBD. Partially obstructing mass (M) is marked. Multiple lesions are again identified in liver.

 


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A. 57-year-old woman with pancreatic cancer. Thick-slab single-shot fast spin-echo MR cholangiography (MRC) image (TR/TE, infinite/800) shows classic double duct sign of pancreatic carcinoma.

 


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B. 57-year-old woman with pancreatic cancer. Axial delayed funtional MRC (fMRC) image (TR/TE, 6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) obtained several hours after mangafodipir trisodium injection shows enhancement of liver parenchyma without excretion of contrast agent into biliary tree. This finding persisted at 24 hr. Tumor completely obstructs biliary tree.

 


View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A. 55-year-old woman with biliary obstruction caused by metastatic ovarian carcinoma, requiring stent placement across common bile duct. Patency of stent was evaluated by MRI. (Reprinted with permission from [1]) Coronal single-shot fast spin-echo MR cholangiography (MRC) image (TR/TE, infinite/186) shows limited visualization of common bile duct stent. Functionality of stent cannot be assessed.

 


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B. 55-year-old woman with biliary obstruction caused by metastatic ovarian carcinoma, requiring stent placement across common bile duct. Patency of stent was evaluated by MRI. (Reprinted with permission from [1]) Axial mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced functional MRC (fMRC) image (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) shows excretion of contrast material into dilated intrahepatic biliary tree.

 


View larger version (215K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7C. 55-year-old woman with biliary obstruction caused by metastatic ovarian carcinoma, requiring stent placement across common bile duct. Patency of stent was evaluated by MRI. (Reprinted with permission from [1]) Coronal mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced fMRC image (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) shows excretion of contrast material around stent into duodenum (D), confirming patency.

 


View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8. 45-year-old woman with anatomic variant of biliary tree. Axial mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced functional MR cholangiography image (TR/TE, 6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) shows low cystic duct insertion (CD) and ductal configuration that may increase risk for bile duct injury at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

 


View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9. 38-year-old woman evaluated as liver transplant donor with mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced functional MR cholangiography (fMRC) shows variant ductal anomaly. Coronal oblique maximum-intensity-projection fMRC image (TR/TE, 5.6/2.5; flip angle, 40°) shows segment IV biliary duct draining into right hepatic duct. Other ducts are labeled. CHD = common hepatic duct, CBD = common bile duct.

 


View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10A. 40-year-old man evaluated as liver transplant donor with mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced functional MR cholangiography (fMRC) shows variant ductal anomaly that is only seen by fMRC. Coronal single-shot fast spin-echo MRC image (TR/TE, infinite/150) shows no significant abnormality. Ductal system is not well defined.

 


View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10B. 40-year-old man evaluated as liver transplant donor with mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced functional MR cholangiography (fMRC) shows variant ductal anomaly that is only seen by fMRC. Coronal oblique maximum-intensity-projection fMRC image (5.6/2.5; flip angle, 40°) shows right posterior biliary duct (arrow) draining into left duct.

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11A. 20-year-old man with end-stage liver disease secondary to argininosuccinase synthase deficiency who underwent liver transplantation and experienced postoperative complication. Axial single-shot fast spin-echo MRI image (TR/TE, infinite/100) shows transplanted liver and marked ascites. Focal perihepatic fluid collection (FL) is identified.

 


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11B. 20-year-old man with end-stage liver disease secondary to argininosuccinase synthase deficiency who underwent liver transplantation and experienced postoperative complication. Coronal functional MR cholangiography (fMRC) image (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) shows mangafodipir trisodium in common bile duct. Anastamosis is marked (A). Additional focus of contrast material is present outside biliary tree, compatible with anastamotic leak (arrow). Contrast agent has passed into duodenum (D); there is no evidence of biliary obstruction.

 


View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11C. 20-year-old man with end-stage liver disease secondary to argininosuccinase synthase deficiency who underwent liver transplantation and experienced postoperative complication. Coronal fMRC image (6/2.2; flip angle, 40°) obtained more anteriorly shows contrast agent accumulating outside biliary tree within fluid collection (arrow), compatible with biliary leak.

 


View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11D. 20-year-old man with end-stage liver disease secondary to argininosuccinase synthase deficiency who underwent liver transplantation and experienced postoperative complication. Corresponding diisopropyl iminodiacetic acid scan shows biliary leak (arrow), but site of leak is not clearly depicted. For optimal surgical management, it was important to determine site of biliary extravasation before reoperation.

 


Technique
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Technique
Comparison with Other Techniques
Conclusion
References
 
Although several hepatobiliary contrast agents are being developed that may be suitable for the performance of an fMRC sequence in the future [2], mangafodipir trisodium is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved contrast agent for the evaluation of liver lesions [3, 4] and is used for fMRC imaging [1, 5]. FMRC imaging constitutes an off-label use of mangafodipir trisodium. As of March 2004, manufacturing of mangafodipir had been suspended by Nycomed Amersham, but resumption of manufacturing is expected.

FMRC images of the biliary tree are obtained as follows: Approximately 10–20 min after the injection of mangafodipir (dose, 5 µmol/kg or 0.5 mL/kg administered at 2–3 mL/min), high-resolution 3D GRE images are obtained in coronal, coronal oblique, and axial planes (TR/TE, 6/2.2; flip angle, 40°; field of view, 28 cm2; matrix, 256 x 128; 3.0-mm slice thickness with zero fill interpolation to yield 64 images per slab at 1.5-mm increments with 1.5-mm overlap; number of excitations, 0.5; bandwidth ± 62 kHz), usually requiring two slab overlapping prescriptions. If initial images do not show contrast material in the biliary tree, this sequence can be repeated as needed at later intervals to obtain additional delayed imaging. If clinically indicated, we advocate that delayed imaging be performed at 2-hr intervals after injection as needed, until visualization of the contrast agent in the gallbladder and duodenum is possible (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E and 3A, 3B). The exact time interval at which delayed imaging is executed is in part dependent on the availability of the MR scanner.

Because the excretion of mangafodipir into the biliary tree interferes with successful visualization of biliary fluid on conventional T2-weighted MRC sequences (Fig. 4A, 4B), conventional MRC imaging must be performed before excretion of mangafodipir into the biliary tree. If a conventional T2-weighted MRC sequence is not desired, delayed imaging of the biliary tree may be performed after the IV administration of mangafodipir without the performance of a conventional single-shot fast spin-echo MRC.

Hence, fMRC imaging can be performed in two ways, as a combined study with conventional MRC (combined MRC) or as a delayed postcontrast study without conventional MRC (fMRC alone). The advantage of combined MRC is that additional information obtained from the T2-weighted contrast agent within the ducts may further support findings seen on fMRC images. The disadvantage is that additional delayed imaging may be required if mangafodipir has not been excreted into the biliary system on early images. However, when additional delayed imaging is performed, the transit time of contrast agent into the biliary tree and gallbladder may be determined and be of value in some instances, such as in the diagnosis of chronic cholecystitis and partial biliary duct obstructions, entities in which delayed filling of the gallbladder and biliary tree occurs (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E and 3A, 3B). Also, on occasion, high-signal-intensity bile may have a similar signal intensity to that of the contrast material. It is useful to distinguish excretion of contrast material in the gallbladder from native bile (Fig. 2E). If, however, imaging with fMRC alone is needed, mangafodipir may be injected and subsequent imaging can take place several hours after injection, potentially eradicating the need for delayed imaging. Suspected acute cholecystitis is an ideal setting for which fMRC alone may be sufficient (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C). For indications other than acute cholecystitis, including suspected biliary ductal obstruction (Figs. 5A, 5B, 5C, 6A, 6B, 7A, 7B, 7C) and biliary leaks (Fig. 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D), we perform combined MRC. An fMRC sequence is valuable in the evaluation of a potential liver transplant donor for detection of variant biliary ductal drainage [5] (Figs. 9 and 10A, 10B).


Comparison with Other Techniques
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Technique
Comparison with Other Techniques
Conclusion
References
 
Our arsenal of techniques for evaluation of the biliary tree includes sonography, conventional MRC, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, CT, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC).

Sonography is typically the initial technique used for the assessment of the biliary tree and although it is a highly sensitive technique for the evaluation of the gallbladder [6], it is limited in cases in which the biliary ducts are not dilated and for the evaluation of the extrahepatic biliary tree [7]. Conventional MRC is a fast, heavily T2-weighted MR sequence that depicts the fluid-containing biliary tree in a noninvasive manner, requires no contrast agent administration or preparation, and portends none of the complications associated with invasive cholangiography. Both MRC and CT have been established as highly sensitive techniques for the diagnosis of anatomic abnormalities of the gallbladder and biliary tree [8, 9]. However, after imaging with these cross-sectional techniques, a functional assessment of the biliary tree can only be suggested based on associated anatomic findings, including biliary ductal dilatation, stricture, and filling defects. Obstruction of bile flow cannot be definitively diagnosed. For a functional assessment (noninvasively), a second test such as cholescintigraphy is commonly performed.

Hepatobiliary scintigraphy with an iminodiacetic acid derivative such as diisopropyl iminodiacetic acid provides functional information but lacks resolution to show the anatomic cause of obstruction. Filling defects and strictures are uncommonly visualized and the diagnosis of partial obstruction is not made in up to 50% of patients [10]. Scintigraphy also has false-positive results in nonfasting patients, patients with severe hepatic failure, and patients with hyperbilirubinemia.

Finally, ERC and PTC provide the opportunity for treatment at the time of diagnosis that the noninvasive techniques discussed here lack. Although invasive cholangiography studies are sensitive diagnostic methods, complications result in as many as 11% of cases [11].


Conclusion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Technique
Comparison with Other Techniques
Conclusion
References
 
FMRC has the potential to provide a comprehensive examination for the anatomic and functional assessment of the biliary tree and gallbladder. Its compelling advantage is its ability to depict functional information. Partial and complete obstruction may be distinguished along with the inciting anatomic abnormality, a feature particularly useful for treatment planning. In addition, variant bile duct anatomy, complex biliary–enteric anastamoses, biliary stent patency (particularly nonmetal stents), and suspected biliary extravasation can be thoroughly evaluated with fMRC.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Technique
Comparison with Other Techniques
Conclusion
References
 

  1. Fayad LM, Holland GA, Bergin D, et al. Functional and anatomic evaluation of the gallbladder and biliary tree with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC). J Magn Reson Imaging2003; 18:449 –460[Medline]
  2. Ni Y, Marchal G. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for tissue characterization of liver abnormalities with hepatobiliary contrast agents: an overview of preclinical animal experiments. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1998;9:183 –195[Medline]
  3. Braga JH, Choti MA, Le VS, Paulson EK, Siegelman ES, Bluemke DA. Liver lesions: manganese-enhanced MR and dual-phase helical CT for preoperative detection and characterization—comparison with receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology2002; 223:525 –531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Federle M, Chezmar J, Rubin DL, et al. Efficacy and safety of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. multicenter phase III clinical trials—efficacy of early imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging2000; 12:689 –701[Medline]
  5. Lee VS, Rofsky NM, Morgan GR, et al. Volumetric mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced cholangiography to define intrahepatic biliary anatomy. AJR2001; 176:906 –908[Free Full Text]
  6. Ralls PW, Colletti PM, Halls JM, Siemsen JK. Prospective evaluation of 99mTc-IDA cholescintigraphy and gray-scale ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Radiology1982; 144:369 –371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Rubens DJ. Hepatobiliary imaging and its pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am2004; 24:257 –278
  8. Wyatt SH, Fishman EK. Biliary tract obstruction: the role of spiral CT in detection and definition of disease. Clin Imaging 1997;21:27 –34[Medline]
  9. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW. MR cholangiography: technical advances and clinical applications. RadioGraphics1999; 19:25 –41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Thrall JH, Zeissman HA. Hepatobiliary system. In: Gay S, ed. Nuclear medicine. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book,1995 : 199–204
  11. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:652 –656[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. K. Lee, S. Kim, J. W. Lee, S. H. Lee, D. H. Kang, G. H. Kim, and H. I. Seo
Biliary MR Imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Its Clinical Applications
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2009; 29(6): 1707 - 1724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Hoeffel, L. Azizi, M. Lewin, V. Laurent, C. Aube, L. Arrive, and J.-M. Tubiana
Normal and Pathologic Features of the Postoperative Biliary Tract at 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography and MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1603 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS