AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2005; 184:1744-1748
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Imaging of Patellar Cartilage with a 2D Multiple-Echo Data Image Combination Sequence

Marius R. Schmid1, Christian W. A. Pfirrmann1, Peter Koch2, Marco Zanetti1, Bernd Kuehn3 and Juerg Hodler1

1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich CH-8008, Switzerland.
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich CH-8008, Switzerland.
3 MR Applications Development, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany.

Received July 7, 2004; accepted after revision August 14, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to M. R. Schmid.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic value of a 2D multiple-echo data image combination (MEDIC) MRI sequence in the detection of patellar cartilage defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Our study included 52 consecutive patients who had knee surgery within 4 months of undergoing an MRI examination including an axial 2D MEDIC (TR/TE, 884/26; flip angle, 30°) sequence. Cartilage was surgically graded on a 5-point scale: 0, normal; 1, softening or swelling; 2, partial thickness defect; 3, fissuring to the level of the subchondral bone; or 4, exposed subchondral bone. Cartilage was graded on MRI according to a scale that was almost identical to the surgical scale except that grade 1 lesions were defined as signal alteration or swelling of cartilage. Two blinded reviewers independently analyzed patellar cartilage. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and weighted kappa values for interobserver variability were calculated.

RESULTS. Low-grade cartilage lesions predominated in our study group. When grade 2 or higher was considered the threshold for relevance, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the MEDIC sequence was as high as 79%, 82%, and 81%, respectively. Increasing the threshold of relevance to grade 3 increased the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to as high as 83%, 91%, and 90%, respectively. Interobserver agreement for the MEDIC sequence was good (weighted {kappa} = 0.68).

CONCLUSION. The 2D MEDIC sequence performs comparably to previously described sequences optimized for cartilage imaging such as the 3D double-echo steady-state or 3D spoiled gradient-recalled sequences with good interobserver agreement, high sensitivity, and excellent specificity for revealing low- to intermediate-degree cartilage defects.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Osteoarthritis is one of the major causes of chronic disability in older patients [1]. However, abnormalities of articular cartilage can also be found in young and middle-aged patients. Various surgical procedures for repair of localized chondral defects have been developed [2]. In cases of severe cartilage damage, high tibial osteotomy or total [3] or unicompartmental [4] knee arthroplasty is performed. For surgical decision making, an imaging method that can be used to reliably detect both early and advanced cartilage loss is crucial [5, 6].

Standard radiographs and clinical findings [7, 8] do not correlate well with the degree of osteoarthritis. MRI with and without intraarticular contrast administration is currently the most reliable imaging method for detecting articular cartilage defects in the knee joint [9-23], with slightly less impressive results for other joints whose cartilage is thinner [24-29].

Standard MRI sequences such as T2-weighted and proton-density-weighted spin-echo and turbo spin-echo sequences with and without fat suppression show satisfactory results in cartilage defect detection [9, 12]. Dedicated cartilage sequences may improve the reliability of MRI [10, 11, 13, 15-18]. This group includes 3D spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) or 3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequences with fat saturation and 3D double-echo steady-state (DESS) sequences, which showed sensitivity and specificity as high as 96% and 95%, respectively [15]. The MEDIC combination sequence is another MRI sequence potentially useful in imaging of articular cartilage. On MEDIC and DESS images, bone is hypointense, articular cartilage is of intermediate to low signal intensity, and joint fluid is hyperintense relative to cartilage, unlike on SPGR or FLASH sequence images obtained with fat suppression, in which joint fluid appears hypointense compared with articular cartilage. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of the 2D MEDIC in the detection of patellar cartilage defects.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic drawing illustrates multiple-echo data image combination (MEDIC) sequence. HF = high frequency, GS = slice-selection gradient, GP = phase-detection gradient, GB = readout gradient, ADC = analog-to-digital converter.

 

Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
For this investigation, patients were included in a consecutive fashion if they had both an MRI examination with an axial 2D MEDIC sequence and had open or arthroscopic surgery performed at our institution within 4 months of the imaging examination. Exclusion criteria included interference with the MRI assessment of patellar cartilage by metal-induced susceptibility artifacts and an absence of a specific description of the patellar cartilage in the surgical report.



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Grade 1 and 2 cartilage lesions. Axial image acquired with multiple-echo data image combination (MEDIC) sequence (TR/TE, 884/26; flip angle, 30°) shows grade 1 (curved arrows) and arthroscopically verified grade 2 (straight arrows) cartilage lesions in 57-year-old man. Cartilage signal irregularity in lateral facet (grade 1 lesion; curved arrows) and thinning of cartilage to less than half of thickness of normal cartilage (grade 2; straight arrows) are seen in central part of retropatellar cartilage.

 
Between March 2001 and September 2003, 52 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (mean age, 36 years; range, 16-64 years; 24 women, 28 men). Knee arthroscopy was performed in 36 cases and open knee surgery was performed in 16 cases. The following surgical procedures were performed (more than one procedure per knee may have been performed). Partial or total meniscectomy (n = 27), anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (n = 15), cartilage shaving and debridement (n = 9), reconstruction of the trochlear groove (n = 3), synovial plica surgery (n = 3), removal of loose bodies (n = 2), and miscellaneous (n = 2). Because our institution fulfills pertinent state regulations protecting patients' rights, retrospective evaluations do not require an additional permit by the institutional review board.

Imaging
All patients were examined on a 1.5-T MR system (Symphony, Siemens Medical Solutions). For analysis of the retropatellar cartilage, only the axial MEDIC sequence (TR/TE, 884/26; flip angle, 30°; bandwidth, 391 Hz/pixel; section thickness, 3 mm; intersection gap, 1.5 mm; 19 sections; field of view, 15 cm; matrix size, 240 x 256; one acquisition; acquisition time, 3 min 48 sec) was evaluated. Six echoes were used in this multiecho implementation with the following TE: 12.8, 18.0, 23.2, 28.4, 33.6, and 38.8 msec. The following sequences were included in the routine imaging protocol but were not evaluated for this study: sagittal proton-density- and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences, coronal T1-weighted spin-echo sequence, and coronal T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence with fat saturation.

MEDIC Sequence Description
In orthopedic imaging, T2*-weighted gradient-echo sequences are typically acquired with a single echo per line in k-space (e.g., in fast imaging with steady-state free precession [FISP] or FLASH sequences with long TE). To compensate for the low signal-to-noise ratio inherent in such sequences, one must use a low receiver bandwidth. This, however, compromises spatial resolution because the shape of the gradient echo is significantly impaired by the T2* decay of the transversal magnetization. The MEDIC sequence provides a potential solution to this problem. The sequence is schematically shown in Figure 1. A series of identically phase-encoded gradient echoes is sampled per line in k-space. Unipolar readout gradients are used to avoid off-resonance effects and to achieve flow compensation in the readout direction. Magnitude images are reconstructed for each echo. The resulting images are then combined using a sum of squares algorithm. The combination of multiple echoes improves the signal-to-noise ratio. Receiver bandwidth can then be increased, and the readout duration reduced. As a consequence, T2* effects and impairment of the spatial resolution are reduced compared with a low bandwidth gradient-echo sequence acquiring a single echo.

Surgical Grading of Cartilage Lesions, Image Analysis, and Statistics
The grading used by the surgeons involved in this study is a modification of the system originally described by Outerbridge [30]. The following degrees of cartilage damage are differentiated on a 5-point scale: 0, normal; 1, softening or swelling; 2, partial thickness defect; 3, fissuring to the level of the subchondral bone; or 4, exposed subchondral bone. In the original Outerbridge classification system [30], grades 2 and 3 lesions are defined as fragmentation or fissuring with a diameter of less (grade 2) or more (grade 3) than 1 inch (~2.5 cm). In cases of multiple cartilage defects within the retropatellar cartilage surface, only the highest grade of cartilage defect was described in surgical reports. The axial 2D MEDIC was retrospectively reviewed separately on a PACS workstation (ID.Read, Image Devices) by two musculoskeletal radiologists who were blinded to clinical data including surgical reports. Their experience with MRI of the joints was 10 and 6 years, respectively. Grade 1 lesions were diagnosed in the presence of signal alterations without cartilage deformity or when cartilage swelling was seen. Grades 2-4 were graded according to the same criteria as the ones used during surgery (Figs. 2, 3, 4). According to the cartilage description in the surgical reports, the retropatellar cartilage (medial and lateral facets) was analyzed as a single entity. In cases of multiple retropatellar cartilage defects, the score of the worst cartilage abnormality was used for this study.



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Grade 3 cartilage lesion. Axial image acquired with multiple-echo data image combination (MEDIC) sequence (TR/TE, 884/26; flip angle, 30°) shows arthroscopically proven grade 3 cartilage lesion (arrow) in left knee of 49-year-old man. Fissuring to level of subchondral bone in medial facet of retropatellar cartilage is present.

 


View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. Grade 4 cartilage lesion. Axial image acquired with multiple-echo data image combination (MEDIC) sequence (TR/TE, 884/26; flip angle, 30°) shows arthroscopically proven grade 4 cartilage lesion (arrows) in right knee of 55-year-old woman. Exposed subchondral bone in medial facet of retropatellar cartilage is seen.

 

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the MEDIC sequence compared with the surgical reports were calculated. Weighted kappa values [31, 32] were calculated to assess interobserver agreement. According to Landis and Koch [33], a kappa value of 0.20 or less indicated poor agreement; 0.21-0.40, fair; 0.41-60, moderate; 0.61-0.80, good; and 0.81-1.0, very good agreement. For statistical analysis, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (version 10, SPSS) was used.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Low-grade cartilage lesions predominated in our study population. Surgery identified grade 0 (n = 31), grade 1 (n = 7), grade 2 (n = 8), grade 3 (n = 3), and grade 4 (n = 3) in 60%, 13%, 15%, 6%, and 6%, respectively, of the patients. Table 1 shows the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for both reviewers and for various diagnostic thresholds. From a clinical point of view, a threshold at grade 2 (lesions grade 2 and higher defined as abnormal) seems to be the most appropriate. At this threshold, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for reviewers 1 and 2 were 86%, 76%, and 79%, and 79%, 82%, and 81%, respectively. Specificity and accuracy increased for both reviewers when thresholds were set at grades 3 or 4 (Table 1). Interobserver agreement (weighted {kappa} value for multiple categories) was good (weighted {kappa} = 0.68).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of Lesion Detection for 2D Multiple-Echo Data Image Combination (MEDIC)

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Several different MRI sequences have been used for cartilage lesion detection in the knee joint [9-18, 20]. Fewer studies have evaluated MR arthrography or CT arthrography in the knee joint [16, 19, 21, 22, 34]. None of these examination techniques has been perfect for diagnosing articular cartilage abnormalities. To evaluate additional imaging techniques is worthwhile.

To our knowledge, the diagnostic performance of the 2D MEDIC sequence in detecting lesions of articular cartilage has not been evaluated in the peer-reviewed literature. Similar to the 3D DESS sequence [13, 17, 18], our study sequence is a "bright-fluid" sequence (Figs. 2, 3, 4), showing hyaline cartilage as relatively dark in comparison to the hyperintense joint fluid. Proton-density-weighted spin-echo sequences show similar relative signal intensities. However, the signal-difference-to-noise ratio between cartilage and joint fluid is inferior to 3D DESS and MEDIC images. The MEDIC sequence is a T2*-weighted gradient-echo sequence optimized for orthopedic imaging. The MEDIC sequence addresses the main limitations of other gradient-echo sequences such as low signal-to-noise ratio, image degradation due to susceptibility gradients, and chemical shift. This is achieved by acquiring and combining multiple echoes with a high receiver bandwidth instead of using a single low-bandwidth echo. Our results show that the diagnostic performance of the 2D MEDIC sequence is comparable to the established 3D DESS sequence that has already been described by several authors [13, 17, 18, 23]. The best diagnostic performance of the 3D DESS sequence has been reported by Murphy [13] with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 80%, 95%, and 91%, respectively, in detecting cartilage lesions. However, only grades 3 and 4 of cartilage lesions were included in that investigation [13], whereas our study population included a larger proportion of low-grade lesions, which are more difficult to detect. The comparison to the 3D DESS sequence is important because this study has been shown to be superior for detection of low-grade or superficial cartilage defects to 3D fat-suppressed FLASH (or SPGR) sequence despite the greater tissue contrast of the FLASH sequence in a phantom study of Mosher and Pruett [23]. In our study population, low-grade chondral defects predominated. Such abnormalities are more difficult to detect than larger defects. This fact has to be taken into consideration when the results are compared with those of other investigations.

Unlike 3D DESS and MEDIC sequences, most other cartilage MRI sequences are "dark-fluid" sequences. In fat-suppressed SPGR or FLASH sequences with flip angles of approximately 60° [10, 11, 14-16, 20], articular cartilage appears relatively hyperintense in comparison to joint fluid. Disler et al. [10] have compared fat-suppressed SPGR images to standard spin-echo MRI sequences and found significantly higher sensitivities for cartilage lesion detection with the fat-suppressed SPGR sequence (75-85% vs 29-38%). The specificities of fat-suppressed SPGR and spin-echo sequences were identical at 97%. According to our results, the 2D MEDIC sequence has sensitivity similar to that of the fat-suppressed SPGR sequence.

Few studies have compared the diagnostic performance of standard MRI and MR arthrography in detecting articular cartilage defects in the knee joint. Rand et al. [16] found that the sensitivity of SPGR with fat saturation (diagnosis correct within one grade) increased from 81% to 90% after intraarticular contrast administration. In an in vitro study comparing major types of cartilage sequences, MR arthrography had a variable advantage (sensitivity, 45% vs 3-38%) in the detection of grade 2 cartilage lesions over 3D FISP, 3D FLASH (or SPGR), and 2D FLASH sequences [22].

CT arthrography has rarely been used in the diagnosis of articular cartilage abnormalities. In lesions involving less than half of the cartilage thickness, sensitivity and specificity of CT arthrography were slightly superior to those of standard MRI (80-88% vs 78-86%) [19]. This method, however, requires an intraarticular contrast injection and is associated with a relevant local and a small effective radiation dose to the patient.

The subjects in our study were relatively young (mean age, 36 years), and low grades of cartilage lesions predominated. This is a clinically relevant patient group. A number of surgical procedures have been introduced for repair of localized chondral defects [2]. Some patients with a lack of cartilage damage in one knee compartment can benefit from unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or tibial osteotomy [4]. When comparing in vivo studies of articular cartilage abnormalities, the reviewers should keep in mind that the standard of reference (arthroscopy) is not perfect. For several classification systems, relevant interobserver variability in the grading of low-grade chondral defects in the knee joint has been shown [35].

One limitation of our study could be the relatively thick slices used in the MEDIC sequence. Thinner slices using the MEDIC sequence are possible. However, for clinical imaging, the coverage in the z-axis with axial images is important because they may not only show retropatellar cartilage but also abnormalities of the femoral groove, the medial and lateral retinaculum, the patellar tendon, and meniscal and synovial cysts. At our institution, the 3-mm slice thickness with an intersection gap of 1.5 mm is considered to represent an optimal compromise with regard to signal-to-noise ratio, z-axis coverage, and examination time. If optimized for cartilage imaging with a smaller slice thickness, a smaller interslice gap, and an increased number of acquisitions, the MEDIC sequence may perform even better than presented in our results. Other limitations are the relatively small sample size including a small number of high-grade cartilage lesions. In addition, the results of our study have not been compared with another imaging method in the same study population. Instead, our results have been compared with surgical findings and to results of other investigations with different reviewers, different patients, and different equipment.

In conclusion, the 2D MEDIC sequence performs comparably to previously described sequences optimized for cartilage imaging such as the 3D DESS or 3D SPGR sequences with good interobserver agreement, high sensitivity, and excellent specificity in detecting low to intermediate degrees of cartilage defects.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Peyron JG. Epidemiological aspects of osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl1988; 77:29 -33[Medline]
  2. Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T, Schnettler R. Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint: a prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am2003; 85:185 -192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Van Loon CJ, Pluk C, de Waal Malefijt MC, de Kock M, Veth RP. The GSB total knee arthroplasty: a medium- and long-term follow-up and survival analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surgery2001; 121:26 -30
  4. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al. Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:970 -976[Medline]
  5. Buckwalter JA. Articular cartilage injuries. Clin Orthop 2002;402:21 -37
  6. Azer NM, Winalski CS, Minas T. MR imaging for surgical planning and postoperative assessment in early osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42:43 -60[Medline]
  7. Lysholm J, Hamberg P, Gillquist J. The correlation between osteoarthritis as seen on radiography and on arthroscopy. Arthroscopy1987; 3:161 -165[Medline]
  8. Link TM, Steinbach LS, Ghosh S, et al. Osteoarthritis: MR imaging findings in different stages of disease and correlation with clinical findings. Radiology.2003; 226:373 -381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bredella MA, Tirman PFJ, Peterfy CG, et al. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR 1999;172:1073 -1080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR 1996;167:127 -132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA, Schils JP, Belhobeck GH. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology1996; 198:209 -212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Broderick LS, Turner DA, Renfrew DL, Schnitzer TJ, Huff JP, Harris C. Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs. arthroscopy. AJR 1994;162:99 -103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Murphy BJ. Evaluation of grades 3 and 4 chondromalacia of the knee using T2*-weighted 3D gradient-echo articular cartilage imaging. Skeletal Radiol2001; 30:305 -311[Medline]
  14. Reeder SC, Pelc NJ, Alley MT, Gold GE. Rapid MR imaging of articular cartilage with steady-state free precession and multipoint fat-water separation. AJR2003; 180:357 -362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Recht MP, Kramer J, Marcelis S, et al. Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. Radiology1993; 187:473 -478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rand T, Brossmann J, Pedowitz T, Ahn JM, Haghigi P, Resnick D. Analysis of patellar cartilage: comparison of conventional MR imaging and MR and CT arthrography in cadavers. Acta Radiol2000; 41:492 -497[Medline]
  17. Hardy PA, Recht MP, Piraino D, Thomasson D. Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging1996; 6:329 -335[Medline]
  18. Ruehm S, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J. MRI of patellar articular cartilage: evaluation of an optimized gradient-echo sequence (3D DESS). J Magn Reson Imaging1998; 8:1246 -1251[Medline]
  19. Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Poilvache P, et al. Assessment of knee cartilage in cadavers with dual-detector spiral CT arthrography and MR imaging. Radiology2002; 222:430 -436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Friemert B, Oberländer Y, Schwarz W, et al. Diagnosis of chondral lesions of the knee joint: can MRI replace arthroscopy? A prospective study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2004; 12:58 -64[Medline]
  21. Bachmann G, Heinrichs C, Jurgensen I, Rominger M, Scheiter A, Rau WS. Comparison of different MRT techniques in the diagnosis of degenerative cartilage diseases: in vitro study of 50 joint specimens of the knee at T 1.5 [in German]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1997;166:429 -436[Medline]
  22. Gagliardi JA, Chung EM, Chandnani VP, et al. Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. AJR1994; 163:629 -636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mosher TJ, Pruett SW. Magnetic resonance imaging of superficial cartilage lesions: role of contrast in lesion detection. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:178 -182[Medline]
  24. Guntern DV, Pfirrmann CWA, Schmid M, et al. Articular cartilage lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography and prevalence in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Radiology2003; 226:165 -170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Graichen H, Springer V, Flaman T, et al. Validation of high-resolution water-excitation magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative assessment of thin cartilage layers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000;8:106 -114[Medline]
  26. Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Lu Y, et al. Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging. AJR1995; 165:371 -375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Hodler J, Trudell D, Pathria MN, Resnick D. Width of the articular cartilage of the hip: quantification by using fat-suppression spin-echo MR imaging in cadavers. AJR1992; 159:351 -355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Schmid MR, Nötzli HP, Zanetti M, Wyss TF, Hodler J. Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography. Radiology2003; 226:382 -386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CWA, Hodler J, Vienne P, Zanetti M. Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography. Skeletal Radiol2003; 32:559 -565[Medline]
  30. Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br1961; 43:752 -757
  31. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 1981:212 -236
  32. Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology2003; 228:303 -308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Landis JR, Koch GC. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics1977; 33:159 -174[Medline]
  34. Magee T, Shapiro M, Rodriguez J, Williams D. MR arthrography of postoperative knee: for which patients is it useful? Radiology.2003; 229:159 -163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Brismar BH, Wredmark T, Movin T, Leandersson J, Svensson O. Observer reliability in the arthroscopic classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br2003; 85:42 -47

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Andreisek, J. M. Froehlich, J. Hodler, D. Weishaupt, V. Beutler, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, C. Boesch, and D. Nanz
Direct MR Arthrography at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Signal Dependence on Gadolinium and Iodine Concentrations--Phantom Study
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 706 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. R. Duc, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. R. Schmid, M. Zanetti, P. P. Koch, F. Kalberer, and J. Hodler
Articular Cartilage Defects Detected with 3D Water-Excitation True FISP: Prospective Comparison with Sequences Commonly Used for Knee Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 216 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. R. Duc, P. Koch, M. R. Schmid, W. Horger, J. Hodler, and C. W. A. Pfirrmann
Diagnosis of Articular Cartilage Abnormalities of the Knee: Prospective Clinical Evaluation of a 3D Water-Excitation True FISP Sequence
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS