AJR Cardiovascular MRI Course, April 21-23 at Northwestern
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Movies for Fig. 1B-J
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mori, S.
Right arrow Articles by Endo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mori, S.
Right arrow Articles by Endo, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 185:253-256
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Technical Innovation

Clinical Potentials for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Hepatic Volumetric Cine Imaging with the Prototype 256-MDCT Scanner

Shinichiro Mori1,2, Takayuki Obata3, Riwa Kishimoto4, Hirotoshi Kato4, Kenya Murase2, Hideaki Fujiwara2, Susumu Kandatsu4, Shuji Tanada3, Hirohiko Tsujii4 and Masahiro Endo1

1 Department of Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
2 School of Allied Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
3 Department of Medical Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
4 Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.

Received July 16, 2004; accepted after revision October 15, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to S. Mori (shinshin{at}nirs.go.jp).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. To achieve dynamic contrast-enhanced hepatic volumetric cine imaging, we developed a prototype 256-MDCT scanner. This study examined the feasibility of the technique for human hepatic imaging in three hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

CONCLUSION. Volumetric cine imaging successfully visualized dynamic contrast enhancement of the hepatocellular carcinoma. It is helpful to evaluate the phase of contrast enhancement or for functional studies of the head, renal artery, coronary artery, and liver.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Developments in CT technology have allowed applications of 3D images in clinical fields such as diagnosis, surgical simulation, planning of radiation therapy, and monitoring of interventional therapy. Multiphasic images provide important information for the diagnosis and characterization of liver neoplasms [1]. Arterial phase imaging is useful for the detection and characterization of hypervascular hepatic lesions. High spatial resolution can be helpful to achieve a more accurate diagnosis [1]. The development of the latest 16-MDCT has made dynamic 3D imaging possible. However, the craniocaudal coverage of the 16-MDCT scanner's detector, without gantry movement, is typically only 20-32 mm, which imposes a limit on cine imaging, that is, the capturing of images continuously (approximately 1 or more images per second) during and immediately after completion of contrast agent injection. To make cine imaging with a wider coverage in the craniocaudal direction (volumetric cine imaging), we developed a prototype 256-MDCT. The purpose of our study is to give a preliminary visualization of volumetric cine imaging during the arterial phase. For this we used the 256-MDCT to evaluate three hepatocellular carcinoma patients.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Subjects
The subjects in this study were three male patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, ages 63, 70, and 74 years, who were selected at random among the hepatocellular carcinoma patients in our hospital. They gave their informed consent to be included in the study, which was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [2]. All were inpatients of the institute hospital and receiving radiation therapy with a carbon ion beam.

Prototype 256-MDCT
The prototype 256-MDCT used a wide-area cylindric 2D detector, designed on the basis of present CT technology and mounted on the gantry frame of the 16-MDCT (Aquilion, Toshiba Medical Systems) [3]. The number of detectors was 912 (transverse) x 256 (craniocaudal), each approximately 0.58 x 0.50 mm at the center of rotation, resulting in a total of 233,472 elements. The rotation time of the gantry was 1.0 sec. Several collimation sets (e.g., 1-256 x 0.5 mm, 1-128 x 1.0 mm, 1-64 x 2.0 mm) could be set continuously to a 128-mm total beam width. The craniocaudal coverage of the 256-MDCT was approximately 100 mm long with one rotation [4, 5]. The data sampling rate was 900 views/sec, and dynamic range of the analog-digital converter was 16 bits. The detector element consisted of a scintillator and photodiode. The scintillator was Gd2O2S ceramic, and the photodiode was made of single-crystal silicon; these were the same as for an MDCT.

Technique for Volumetric Cine Imaging
After we obtained an initial scout topogram of the abdomen, all patients were scanned in a cine fashion with the gantry centered over the upper abdomen after the onset of injection of 90 mL of nonionic iodinated contrast material (Iopamiron 370 [iopamidol], Nihon Schering) using a power injector with a flow rate of 3.5 mL/sec. The delay between the start of contrast material administration and scanning was 30 sec. Scan parameters were 120 kV, 200 mA, 1 sec rotation time, 10 sec entire scanning time, and 256 x 0.5 mm beam collimation. Effective dose was 27.7 mSv/10 sec [6]. This dose was almost the same as we routinely used for the liver multiphasic protocol. The scanning time was conservatively limited to 10 sec less than the dose routinely used in the institute [6] because the 256-MDCT scans continuously at the same position and the dose increases in proportion to the scanning time. The patients held their breath at end-expiratory during scanning. A Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm was used for reconstruction [7]. It took less than 1 sec to reconstruct volume data of 512 x 512 x 256 voxels by a high-speed image processor with a field programmable gate-array-based architecture. Its physical performance had been previously identified as promising [5]. The reconstruction increment was 0.62 mm with a 0.1 sec time interval and matrix size of 512 x 512 x 256. The reconstructed images were transferred to a workstation (Dell) and software routines were run within the PV-WAVE programming package (Visual Numerics) for image postprocessing.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 74-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Portal venous phase shows wash-out of contrast medium at inferior vena cava (arrow) 30 sec after injection.

 



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 74-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with 3D volume rendering every 1 sec after A. Note slightly enhanced abdominal aorta (arrow, D) 33 sec after injection. Two iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter) were implanted around hepatocellular carcinoma to verify patient positioning with fluoroscopy before each section of radiation therapy. Two bright points (arrows, F) show iridium markers (also seen on other images). Slightly enhanced celiac artery (arrow, G) 36 sec after injection. Note markedly enhanced arterial systems (J) 39 sec after injection.

 



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 74-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with 3D volume rendering every 1 sec after A. Note slightly enhanced abdominal aorta (arrow, D) 33 sec after injection. Two iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter) were implanted around hepatocellular carcinoma to verify patient positioning with fluoroscopy before each section of radiation therapy. Two bright points (arrows, F) show iridium markers (also seen on other images). Slightly enhanced celiac artery (arrow, G) 36 sec after injection. Note markedly enhanced arterial systems (J) 39 sec after injection.

 



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D 74-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with 3D volume rendering every 1 sec after A. Note slightly enhanced abdominal aorta (arrow, D) 33 sec after injection. Two iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter) were implanted around hepatocellular carcinoma to verify patient positioning with fluoroscopy before each section of radiation therapy. Two bright points (arrows, F) show iridium markers (also seen on other images). Slightly enhanced celiac artery (arrow, G) 36 sec after injection. Note markedly enhanced arterial systems (J) 39 sec after injection.

 



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E 74-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with 3D volume rendering every 1 sec after A. Note slightly enhanced abdominal aorta (arrow, D) 33 sec after injection. Two iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter) were implanted around hepatocellular carcinoma to verify patient positioning with fluoroscopy before each section of radiation therapy. Two bright points (arrows, F) show iridium markers (also seen on other images). Slightly enhanced celiac artery (arrow, G) 36 sec after injection. Note markedly enhanced arterial systems (J) 39 sec after injection.

 



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F 74-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with 3D volume rendering every 1 sec after A. Note slightly enhanced abdominal aorta (arrow, D) 33 sec after injection. Two iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter) were implanted around hepatocellular carcinoma to verify patient positioning with fluoroscopy before each section of radiation therapy. Two bright points (arrows, F) show iridium markers (also seen on other images). Slightly enhanced celiac artery (arrow, G) 36 sec after injection. Note markedly enhanced arterial systems (J) 39 sec after injection.

 



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1G 74-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with 3D volume rendering every 1 sec after A. Note slightly enhanced abdominal aorta (arrow, D) 33 sec after injection. Two iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter) were implanted around hepatocellular carcinoma to verify patient positioning with fluoroscopy before each section of radiation therapy. Two bright points (arrows, F) show iridium markers (also seen on other images). Slightly enhanced celiac artery (arrow, G) 36 sec after injection. Note markedly enhanced arterial systems (J) 39 sec after injection.

 



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1H 74-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with 3D volume rendering every 1 sec after A. Note slightly enhanced abdominal aorta (arrow, D) 33 sec after injection. Two iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter) were implanted around hepatocellular carcinoma to verify patient positioning with fluoroscopy before each section of radiation therapy. Two bright points (arrows, F) show iridium markers (also seen on other images). Slightly enhanced celiac artery (arrow, G) 36 sec after injection. Note markedly enhanced arterial systems (J) 39 sec after injection.

 



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1I 74-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with 3D volume rendering every 1 sec after A. Note slightly enhanced abdominal aorta (arrow, D) 33 sec after injection. Two iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter) were implanted around hepatocellular carcinoma to verify patient positioning with fluoroscopy before each section of radiation therapy. Two bright points (arrows, F) show iridium markers (also seen on other images). Slightly enhanced celiac artery (arrow, G) 36 sec after injection. Note markedly enhanced arterial systems (J) 39 sec after injection.

 



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1J 74-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with 3D volume rendering every 1 sec after A. Note slightly enhanced abdominal aorta (arrow, D) 33 sec after injection. Two iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter) were implanted around hepatocellular carcinoma to verify patient positioning with fluoroscopy before each section of radiation therapy. Two bright points (arrows, F) show iridium markers (also seen on other images). Slightly enhanced celiac artery (arrow, G) 36 sec after injection. Note markedly enhanced arterial systems (J) 39 sec after injection.

 

Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Dynamic hepatic CT satisfactorily obtained continuous enhancement in the arterial phase. Contrast enhancement could be observed in coronal views with 3D volume rendering 30 sec after injection (74-year-old man, Fig. 1A). This patient had heart failure, and the backflow of contrast material to the inferior vena cava (IVC) was clearly shown. The hepatic veins were best visualized on the images obtained approximately 30-34 sec after the start of contrast agent injection (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E). The IVC was visualized in contrast enhancement (arrow, Fig. 1A) and then enhancement was completely lost at 36 sec. After 34 sec, enhancement of the abdominal aorta increased gradually (Figs. 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G). The renal artery enhanced gradually at 36 sec, and finally the arterial phase was best visualized on the images with high contrast in the celiac, splenic, and hepatic arteries (Figs. 1I, 1J).



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 63-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Axial view shows hypervascular mass in right lobe of Couinaud's segment 6-7 (arrow). P and Q = orientation of images, MIP = maximum intensity projection.

 



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 63-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with MIP in 33° oblique plane 30-38 sec after injection show only arterial phase. Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma and nutrient artery are clearly visualized. Radiodense objects in all images were iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter).

 



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C 63-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with MIP in 33° oblique plane 30-38 sec after injection show only arterial phase. Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma and nutrient artery are clearly visualized. Radiodense objects in all images were iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter).

 



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D 63-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with MIP in 33° oblique plane 30-38 sec after injection show only arterial phase. Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma and nutrient artery are clearly visualized. Radiodense objects in all images were iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter).

 



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2E 63-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with MIP in 33° oblique plane 30-38 sec after injection show only arterial phase. Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma and nutrient artery are clearly visualized. Radiodense objects in all images were iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter).

 



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2F 63-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Coronal views with MIP in 33° oblique plane 30-38 sec after injection show only arterial phase. Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma and nutrient artery are clearly visualized. Radiodense objects in all images were iridium beads (< 2 mm diameter).

 
An example of dynamic maximum-intensity-projection-reconstructed contrast-enhanced CT from the arterial phase to the portal vein phase was obtained in the oblique plane (63-year-old man, Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, and 2F). Hepatocellular carcinoma (50 x 40 mm) was observed in the right lobe of Couinaud's segment 6-7 (arrow, Fig. 2A). The hepatocellular carcinoma showed a typical early enhancement, and the well-enhanced hepatic artery supplying the hepatocellular carcinoma was clearly visualized at 30 sec after injection. At 31-34 sec, the hepatic arteries had less enhancement. At 38 sec, the hepatic arteries were not visualized at all, and only the hepatic portal veins were revealed (Fig. 2F).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This 256-MDCT scanner was designed to allow cine imaging over a craniocaudal distance of approximately 10 cm. The images created had a 0.5 mm thickness, resulting in isotropic voxels that can be used to create images and cine loops, in any plane, with any of several postprocessing techniques. The scanner has the ability to provide useful information when examining 3D structures, as illustrated in this article. A significant advantage appears in examinations of the abdomen and chest since the major anatomic structures in these regions run longitudinally. High spatial resolution improves evaluation of the liver and its vascular system. The use of thin sections facilitates the detection of small lesions since relatively thick slices result in a partial volume artifact.

Cine images provide useful diagnostic information. In this study, the thin-slice cine images can also be used to create cine loops in multiple planes from the volumetric data acquired from a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, and 2F). This was not possible before with conventional MDCT. Since imaging results can vary considerably depending on differences in patient circulation [8], appropriate timing of the scan after the start of contrast material injection is essential to avoid imaging for an excessively long period with the cine technique to reduce an excessively high dose or to eliminate the need for an excessively long breath-hold. Thus, a volumetric cine imaging with a test bolus is more useful for acquisition of the phase of contrast enhancement study.

In conclusion, the craniocaudal coverage of the 256-MDCT is limited for less than one whole organ such as the liver, and the effective dose is increased in proportion to the scanning time. However, cine imaging in the 256-MDCT is helpful to evaluate the phase of contrast enhancement or functional studies for the head, renal artery, coronary artery, and liver.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Oliver JH III, Baron RL, Gederle MP, Rockette HE Jr. Detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: value of un-enhanced or arterial phase CT imaging or both used in conjunction with conventional portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT imaging. AJR1996; 167:71 -77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, revised. Edinburgh, Scot-land: World Medical Association,2000
  3. Saito Y, Aradate H, Igarashi K, Ide H. Large area 2-dimensional detector for real-time 3-dimensional CT (4DCT). Proc SPIE 2001;4320:775 -782[CrossRef]
  4. Endo M, Mori S, Tsunoo T, et al. Development and performance evaluation of the first model of 4DCT-scanner. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50:1667 -1671[CrossRef]
  5. Mori S, Endo M, Tsunoo T, et al. Physical performance evaluation of a 256-slice CT-scanner for 4-dimensional imaging. Med Phys 2004;31:1348 -1356[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Mori S, Endo M, Nishizawa K, et al. Dose assessment for clinical approach including scattered radiation: comparison of exposure doses in 4DCT and 16-slice CT-scanners. Br J Radiol Manuscript submitted for publication
  7. Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am1984; 1:612 -619
  8. Silverman PM, Roberts SC, Ducic I, et al. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material. AJR 1996;167:79 -84[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Mori, K Nishizawa, M Ohno, and M Endo
Conversion factor for CT dosimetry to assess patient dose using a 256-slice CT scanner
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2006; 79(947): 888 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Movies for Fig. 1B-J
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mori, S.
Right arrow Articles by Endo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mori, S.
Right arrow Articles by Endo, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS