AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gross, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gross, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, L. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1646
AJR 2005; 185:1590-1592
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

Isolated Fallopian Tube Torsion: A Rare Twist on a Common Theme

Megan Gross1, Sylvie L. Blumstein2 and Lawrence C. Chow1,3

1 Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.

Received October 22, 2004; accepted after revision December 6, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to L. C. Chow (chowl{at}ohsu.edu).

3 Present address: Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd. L340, Portland, OR 97201.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Acute pelvic pain in a nonpregnant female patient is a common clinical scenario with a broad clinical differential diagnosis. Such patients are frequently referred for sonography to evaluate the adnexa, in particular for the identification of ovarian torsion that demands early surgical intervention. We encountered a case of isolated fallopian tube torsion in a patient with a normal, nontorsed ipsilateral ovary.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
A 25-year-old gravida 0 woman presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of pelvic pain. On the day before presentation, the patient experienced sudden onset of severe, bilateral lower quadrant pain while jogging. The patient reported doubling over in pain and then resting until the pain slowly resolved. The pain recurred the next day, equal in intensity, and then localized to the right lower quadrant. She reported no significant medical history; surgical history was notable for an appendectomy in childhood. The patient reported being sexually active but denied use of birth control. She took no regular medications and had annual gynecologic examinations with a history of normal Pap smears. On evaluation, the patient was afebrile and had a blood pressure of 97 over 54 mm Hg with a pulse of 79. Physical examination was significant for right adnexal fullness, rebound tenderness in the right lower quadrant, and normal bowel sounds. Complete blood count, urinalysis, and serum chemistries were normal and urine pregnancy test was negative. Endocervical swabs were obtained and sent for culture.

Sonography examination (Figs. 1A and 1B) showed a normal uterus and a normal right ovary with arterial and venous waveforms on spectral Doppler; however, a normal left ovary was not visualized. A midline cystic mass measuring 6.1 x 4.8 x 6.5 cm anterior to the uterus was thought to arise from the left adnexa or ovary, but careful examination of this structure revealed a beaked, tapering appearance, pointing toward the right adnexa. A small amount of simple free fluid was present within the pelvis. CT examination (Figs. 1C and 1D) showed two normal ovaries and free pelvic fluid. Most notably, there was a dilated right adnexal tubular structure that flared at one end to a maximal dimension of 6.0 x 7.2 cm, suspicious for hydrosalpinx. Again, a beaked appearance of the tube, with its vertex centered in the right adnexa, was present.



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 25-year-old woman with acute pelvic pain. Pelvic sonogram shows normal-appearing right ovary with several follicles of varying sizes. Color and spectral Doppler images of ovary depicted normal venous and arterial (not shown) flow, excluding diagnosis of ovarian torsion.

 


View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 25-year-old woman with acute pelvic pain. Midline cystic mass is seen with gray-scale sonography anterior to uterus with region of progressive narrowing as it courses toward right adnexa (arrow).

 


View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 25-year-old woman with acute pelvic pain. Axial contrast-enhanced CT images show midline fluid-attenuation mass (asterisk) with progressive narrowing and focal beak sign (arrow, D) centered in ipsilateral adnexa within lower right hemipelvis, representing dilated, torsed right fallopian tube. Portion of tube opposite point of torsion (arrows, C) is seen and is dilated to lesser degree. Small amount of free fluid (arrowheads, C) is present within right hemipelvis, also suggesting right-sided process.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D 25-year-old woman with acute pelvic pain. Axial contrast-enhanced CT images show midline fluid-attenuation mass (asterisk) with progressive narrowing and focal beak sign (arrow, D) centered in ipsilateral adnexa within lower right hemipelvis, representing dilated, torsed right fallopian tube. Portion of tube opposite point of torsion (arrows, C) is seen and is dilated to lesser degree. Small amount of free fluid (arrowheads, C) is present within right hemipelvis, also suggesting right-sided process.

 
Laparoscopy (Figs. 1E and 1F) showed a dilated, torsed, and necrotic right fallopian tube that was tense and darkened in appearance, measuring 8 x 10 cm. The ovaries were normal in appearance. Slight erythema and dilation of the left fallopian tube was also noted. Omental adhesions were present in the right lower quadrant. Right salpingectomy was performed. The patient was started empirically on doxycycline for presumed pelvic inflammatory disease and was discharged to her home in stable condition on postoperative day 1. Endocervical cultures were ultimately positive for Chlamydia trachomatis.



View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E 25-year-old woman with acute pelvic pain. Laparoscopic photographs show right adnexa in situ (E) and after reflection of fallopian tube (F). Markedly dilated right fallopian tube that appears very dusky and ischemic (black arrows) on one side of point of torsion (curved arrows) and less so opposite torsion (straight white arrows) can be clearly seen in both images. After reflection of tube, normal right ovary (arrowheads, F) is visualized.

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F 25-year-old woman with acute pelvic pain. Laparoscopic photographs show right adnexa in situ (E) and after reflection of fallopian tube (F). Markedly dilated right fallopian tube that appears very dusky and ischemic (black arrows) on one side of point of torsion (curved arrows) and less so opposite torsion (straight white arrows) can be clearly seen in both images. After reflection of tube, normal right ovary (arrowheads, F) is visualized.

 

Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Isolated fallopian tube torsion is a rare cause of lower quadrant pain that primarily affects adolescents and ovulating women and is rarely seen in postmenopausal women. The entity was first described by Bland-Sutton in 1890 and has a prevalence of one in 1.5 million women [1, 2]. Risk factors for isolated fallopian tube torsion include both intrinsic factors, including pelvic inflammatory disease, hydrosalpinx, tubal ligation, and tubal neoplasm; and extrinsic factors such as adhesions, adnexal venous congestion, adjacent ovarian or paraovarian masses, uterine masses, gravid uterus, and trauma [3]. Our patient did not have any obvious risk factors for torsion at the time of presentation but ultimately was shown to have pelvic inflammatory disease with hydrosalpinx, resulting from infection with C. trachomatis.

Patients present with a sudden onset of lower quadrant pain that can be constant and dull or paroxysmal and sharp, radiating to the thigh or groin. Presenting signs and symptoms also include nausea and vomiting, peritoneal signs, and a discrete adnexal mass [1]. Clinically, differential diagnostic considerations include ovarian torsion, rupture of the ovarian follicle (mittelschmerz) or cyst, appendicitis, ectopic pregnancy, pelvic inflammatory disease, intestinal obstruction or perforation, urolithiasis, and cystitis [1]. Complications from tubal torsion include fallopian tube necrosis and gangrenous transformation, leading to an increased risk for superinfection and peritonitis [1]. Local necrosis can also result in irreversible damage to the ipsilateral ovary [4]. Treatment options include surgical detorsion, salpingotomy, and salpingectomy depending on the stage of intervention and presence of complications.

A sequential mechanism of action has been proposed that invokes the mechanical obstruction of adnexal veins and lymphatics, leading to pelvic congestion and edema, enlargement of the fimbrial end, and subsequent partial to complete torsion of the involved tube [5]. Vascular supply to the fallopian tubes and ovaries comes from both ovarian and uterine vessels, resulting in the possibility of isolated tubal torsion without vascular compromise of the ovary. Tubal torsion more commonly affects the right side, possibly because of partial immobilization of the left tube by its proximity to the sigmoid mesentery and because right lower quadrant pain is more often surgically explored secondary to the concern for appendicitis [6].

Reported sonographic findings include a normal-appearing uterus and ovaries with normal flow, free fluid, a dilated tube with thickened, echogenic walls; and internal debris or a convoluted echogenic mass thought to represent a thickened, torsed tube [4, 7]. High impedance or reversal or absence of vascular flow in the tube has also been reported [8], although in practice, confident spectral Doppler analysis of the tubal wall may be difficult. The cystic mass seen on sonography in this case represented the displaced, enlarged torsed right fallopian tube that obscured the left ovary and mimicked a cystic left adnexal mass. The beaked appearance of this structure with the vertex centered in the right adnexa is an interesting finding that may have been a clue to the presence of torsion and its right-rather than left-sided origin.

Reported CT findings of isolated tubal torsion include an adnexal mass, a twisted appearance to the fallopian tube, dilated tube greater than 15 mm, a thickened and enhancing tubal wall, and luminal CT attenuation greater than 50 H consistent with hemorrhage. Secondary signs include free intrapelvic fluid, peritubular fat stranding, enhancement and thickening of the broad ligament, and regional ileus [4].

Although ovarian torsion with associated tubal torsion is far more common than isolated tubal torsion, the imaging diagnosis of an isolated tubal torsion is far more difficult because of the lack of specific findings. In practice, patients with this entity are most likely to be referred for sonography to exclude the diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Although rare, it is important to recognize the possibility of this diagnosis in the setting of hydrosalpinx with a sonographically normal ovary in a patient with acute pain, as delay in diagnosis and treatment may result in increased morbidity. The imaging findings in this case suggest that a beak sign at the site of torsion similar to that seen in closed-loop bowel obstructions or volvulus may be helpful in identifying this entity, although the sensitivity and specificity of this finding for fallopian tube torsion are unknown. Recognition of this condition and prompt intervention increase the likelihood of tubal-sparing surgery and preservation of fertility.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Ferrera PC, Kass LE, Verdile VP. Torsion of the fallopian tube. Am J Emerg Med 1995;13 : 312-314[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Raziel A, Mordechai E, Friedler S, Schachter M, Pansky M, Ron-El R. Isolated recurrent torsion of the Fallopian tube: case report. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:3000 -3001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Provost MW. Torsion of the normal fallopian tube. Obstet Gynecol 1972; 39:80 -82[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ghossain MA, Buy JN, Bazot M, et al. CT in adnexal torsion with emphasis on tubal findings: correlation with US. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18:619 -625[Medline]
  5. Bernardus RE, Van der Slikke JW, Roex AJ, Dijkhuizen GH, Stolk JG. Torsion of the fallopian tube: some considerations on its etiology. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64 : 675-678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bondioni MP, McHugh K, Grazioli L. Isolated fallopian tube torsion in an adolescent: CT features. Pediatr Radiol2002; 32:612 -613[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Propeck PA, Scanlan KA. Isolated fallopian tube torsion. AJR 1998; 170:1112 -1113[Medline]
  8. Baumgartel PB, Fleischer AC, Cullinan JA, Bluth RF. Color Doppler sonography of tubal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1996; 7:367 -370[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
I. Pedrosa, E. A. Zeikus, D. Levine, and N. M. Rofsky
MR Imaging of Acute Right Lower Quadrant Pain in Pregnant and Nonpregnant Patients
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 721 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gross, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gross, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, L. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS