DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.5002-1
AJR 2006; 186:266
© American Roentgen Ray Society
Reply
Thomas Magee
Neuroskeletal Imaging Merritt Island, FL 32953
My colleagues and I thank Dr. Traughber and his colleagues for their
comments on our article [1]. We
wish to clarify some points.
All patients in our study had fat saturation performed on unenhanced proton
density- and T2-weighted images as well as on postarthrographic T1-weighted MR
images. This is not "state-of-the-art imaging" as described by
Traughber et al. but rather minimal state-of-the-community imaging.
The conclusions stated in the article differ from what Traughber et al.
believe them to be. Our conclusions were
[1]:
[Our] results suggest high-performance athletes may be a subgroup of
patients for whom MR arthrography yields considerably more diagnostic
information than conventional MRI....Shoulder MR arthrography is more
sensitive than conventional shoulder MRI for lesion detection in the general
population also. However, whether this modest added benefit warrants the
performance of arthrography on all patients remains to be determined.
References
- Magee T, Williams D, Mani N. Shoulder MR arthrography: which
patient group benefits most? AJR 2004;183
: 969-974[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?