AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blake, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blake, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0110
AJR 2006; 186:269-270
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Renal Oncocytoma Displaying Intense Activity on 18F-FDG PET

Michael A. Blake, Margaret McKernan, Bindu Setty, Alan J. Fischman and Peter R. Mueller

Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA 02114

A 77-year-old woman with a history of endometrioid carcinoma of the left ovary and uterus (treated by total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and chemotherapy in 1998) presented with nausea and progressively enlarging retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy on CT. The patient also had a history of a benign renal mass that was being followed. CT-guided biopsy in December 2002 yielded a pathologic diagnosis of oncocytoma rather than well-differentiated renal cell carcinoma.

18F-FDG PET/CT (Reveal XVI, CPS Innovations) was performed to evaluate for metastatic endometroid carcinoma in the setting of enlarging retroperitoneal nodes. CT images showed a 4.4-cm enhancing solid mass in the upper pole of the right kidney, which had shown slow interval growth over time (Figs. 1A and 1C). Coregistered CT/18F-FDG PET images (Figs. 1B and 1D) showed intense hypermetabolism in the renal mass. The mean standardized uptake value of the mass normalized for body weight was 12.3. There was also intense hypermetabolism in the retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (not shown in the figures).



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 77-year-old woman with renal oncocytoma. Axial (A and B) and coronal (C and D) enhanced CT and fused PET/CT images of large enhancing right renal mass (arrows) demonstrating intense 18F-FDG activity.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 77-year-old woman with renal oncocytoma. Axial (A and B) and coronal (C and D) enhanced CT and fused PET/CT images of large enhancing right renal mass (arrows) demonstrating intense 18F-FDG activity.

 


View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 77-year-old woman with renal oncocytoma. Axial (A and B) and coronal (C and D) enhanced CT and fused PET/CT images of large enhancing right renal mass (arrows) demonstrating intense 18F-FDG activity.

 


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D 77-year-old woman with renal oncocytoma. Axial (A and B) and coronal (C and D) enhanced CT and fused PET/CT images of large enhancing right renal mass (arrows) demonstrating intense 18F-FDG activity.

 
With a paucity of reports in the literature of hypermetabolic 18F-FDG uptake in renal oncocytoma and interval growth of the renal mass, there was concern that the renal lesion could represent a well-differentiated renal cell carcinoma (RCC), although the intensity of 18F-FDG uptake would be unusual for RCC. Metastatic disease of the kidney, while also a possibility, was felt to be less likely given the slow rate of growth. Since periaortic lymphadenopathy adjacent to the duodenum was felt to be responsible for clinical symptoms of nausea and vomiting, the decision was made to perform a coordinated right nephrectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Pathology revealed the renal mass to be an oncocytoma, whereas the retroperitoneal nodes were shown to be involved with metastatic high-grade carcinoma of müllerian origin, consistent with the endometrioid.

To our knowledge, there has only been one previous mention in the literature of 18F-FDG PET activity in a renal oncocytoma—an incidental false-positive lesion in a series evaluating the efficacy of 18F-FDG PET for characterization of RCC [1]. However, the intensity of 18F-FDG uptake was not quantified. Multiple studies have documented relatively low sensitivity (31-77%) [1-4] for detection of primary RCC with 18F-FDG PET, but a recent series of 66 patients reported a specificity of 100% [4]. As a greater number of institutions elect a conservative (nonsurgical) approach to management of oncocytomas, it is important to recognize that oncocytomas can yield false-positive results on 18F-FDG PET, and absolute radiologic differentiation of oncocytoma from RCC remains elusive.


References
Top
References
 

  1. Aide N, Cappele O, Bottet P, et al. Efficiency of [(18)F]FDG PET in characterising renal cancer and detecting distant metastases: a comparison with CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30 : 1236-1245[Medline]
  2. Bachor R, Kotzerke J, Gottfried HW, Brandle E, Reske SN, Hautmann R. Positron emission tomography in diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma [in German]. Urologe A 1996;35 : 146-150[Medline]
  3. Miyakita H, Tokunaga M, Onda H, et al. Significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for detection of renal cell carcinoma and immunohistochemical glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) expression in the cancer. Int J Urol2002; 9:15 -18[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Kang DE, White RL, Zuger JH, Sasser HC, Teigland CM. Clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography for detection of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2004;171 : 1806-1809[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
L R Williams, M J Oldale, and A J Bradley
Imaging renal masses and staging renal tumours
Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 73 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blake, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blake, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS