AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattarai, N.
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhattarai, N.
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1600
AJR 2006; 186:44-47
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Intraductal Papilloma: Features on MR Ductography Using a Microscopic Coil

Nitya Bhattarai1, Yoshihide Kanemaki1, Yasuyuki Kurihara1, Yasuo Nakajima1, Mamoru Fukuda2 and Ichiro Maeda3

1 Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, 216-8511 Japan.
2 Department of Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
3 Department of Pathology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.

Received October 13, 2004; accepted after revision December 16, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to N. Bhattarai.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to describe the features of intraductal papilloma on MR ductography using a microscopic coil.

CONCLUSION. Intraductal papilloma appeared in most cases as a well-circumscribed mass with early enhancement and delayed washout associated with a dilated duct, predominantly showing signal hyperintensity on T1- and T2-weighted imaging.

Keywords: breast • MR imaging


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Intraductal papilloma is a common benign neoplasm of the breast. Conventional ductography has long been used to detect intraductal lesions. MR ductography using a microscopic coil has recently been proposed [1] as a noninvasive, safe, and reliable alternative to conventional ductography to detect intraductal lesions. We describe the features of intraductal papilloma on MR ductography using a microscopic coil.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Eighteen women (mean age, 49 years; range, 25-73 years) of histopathologically confirmed intraductal papilloma were treated in our institution between December 2002 and June 2003. MR ductography using a microscopic coil was performed in all patients before surgery. Patients were referred for nipple discharge (n = 14), bloody discharge (n = 11), serous discharge (n = 3), palpable mass (n = 3), or both palpable mass and serous nipple discharge (n = 1). The patients who were referred for nipple discharge had a history of nipple discharge on at least one occasion and subsequent papilloma on histopathology. Mammography was performed for all patients. Conventional ductography was performed before MR ductography for two of the 18 patients.

MRI was performed with the patient in a prone position using a 1.5-T Intera Master (Philips Medical Systems) and a 4.7-cm diameter Microscopy Coil (Philips Medical Systems) as a surface coil to evaluate fine signal data from the ductal system. Use of this coil allows local signal acquisition with very high signal-to-noise ratio, which was used to increase spatial resolution by acquiring a 512 x 256 matrix for a 7-cm field of view, resulting in a 0.137-mm in-plane resolution, much higher than that of existing coils (0.3-0.7 mm). An inherent property of these small coils, which display very high local sensitivity, is that signal yield at a greater distance from the coil is low. This problem was overcome using a postprocessing technique that provides perfect correction, resulting in a uniform signal level. The technique, known as Constant Level Appearance (CLEAR, Philips Medical Systems), was performed by acquiring auxiliary signals from the small coil itself and also a body coil. These supplementary signals were used to produce auxiliary values, which were then used to correct image data from the small coil.

Axial T2-weighted (TR/TE, 1500/120) turbo spin-echo and axial T1-weighted (43/8.7; flip angle, 50°) 3D fast-field echo images were obtained using a fat-saturation technique and the CLEAR algorithm with a slice thickness of 1.6 mm (0.8-mm overlap). Gadodiamide hydrate (Omniscan, Daiichi Pharmaceuticals) was administered IV as bolus injection at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight over 10 sec. Immediately after injection of the contrast agent, early-phase T1-weighted axial imaging was performed (acquisition time, 60 sec). Delayed-phase axial imaging (acquisition time, 5 min 48 sec) was taken after the early phase, and delayed-phase coronal imaging was subsequently performed. During the dynamic phase, three postcontrast images were taken: early axial, delayed axial, and delayed coronal in series, one after another.

All MR images were interpreted retrospectively by two radiologists experienced in breast imaging with a knowledge of clinical and histopathologic findings. Masses and dilated ducts were interpreted (Table 1) as showing signal hyper-, iso-, or hypointensity compared with signal intensity in the normal breast gland. The dilated duct was interpreted as distal (from the lesion toward the nipple) or proximal. Maximum diameters of the dilated duct and lesion were measured. Patterns of enhancement were interpreted in the early and delayed phases as homogeneously enhanced or not and washed out or not, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Findings of Intraductal Papilloma on MR Ductography

 


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Mammographic results were negative (i.e., category 1) according to BI-RADS in 16 of the 18 patients, and category 3 in the remaining two patients. Both cases in which conventional ductography was performed displayed dilated ducts and filling defects corresponding to MRI findings.

On MR ductography, all 18 cases (100%) of intraductal papilloma were associated with a dilated duct displaying distal dilation (n = 11, 61%), distal and proximal dilation (n = 6, 33%), or proximal dilation (n = 1, 6%). The minimum detected diameter of a dilated duct was 2 mm (range, 2-10 mm). Signal intensity of the dilated ducts on T1-weighted fat-saturation imaging was high in 15 cases (83%), isointense in two cases (11.1%), and low in one case (5.5%). Signal hyperintensity of the dilated ducts was seen in 14 cases (78%) on T2-weighted imaging, and 14 cases (78%) revealed signal hyperintensity of the dilated ducts on T1- and T2-weighted imaging. Of the 18 cases of intraductal papilloma, 11 had a history of bloody nipple discharge and 10 showed signal hyperintensity on T1-weighted imaging. Despite a history of bloody nipple discharge, one case of intraductal papilloma showed signal isointensity of the dilated duct on T1-weighted imaging.

All papillomas were located in the subareolar region (100%) and represented single lesions. The average distance of the lesion from the nipple was 18 mm (range, 9-49 mm). All 18 papillomas (100%) were isointense on T2-weighted imaging. The minimum diameter of the detected lesion was 3 mm (range, 3-13 mm). Most lesions (n = 16) had smooth margins (well circumscribed) and two had irregular margins. Homogeneous early enhancement was apparent in 17 lesions (94%), with one lesion (6%) showing poor enhancement in the early phase. Lesions appeared homogeneously washed out in 13 cases (72%), two (11%) were heterogeneously washed out, two (11%) showed a plateau, and one (6%) showed central washout; the peripheral aspect of the one specific lesion did not show washout in the delay phase (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E).



View larger version (183K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 54-year-old woman with intraductal papilloma. Axial T1-weighted precontrast image shows hyperintense dilated proximal (P) and distal (D) duct with well-circumscribed isointense intraductal lesion 8 mm in diameter.

 


View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 54-year-old woman with intraductal papilloma. Axial T2-weighted image shows hyperintense dilated duct with well-circumscribed isointense intraductal lesion.

 


View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 54-year-old woman with intraductal papilloma. Early phase of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced image shows homogeneous enhancement of intraductal lesion.

 


View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D 54-year-old woman with intraductal papilloma. Histopathology reveals epithelial fronds supported by fibrovascular stroma composed of epithelial cells and myoepithelial cells arising from duct. (H and E, x1)

 


View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E 54-year-old woman with intraductal papilloma. Histopathology reveals epithelial cells (black arrow) lining luminal aspect of duct, myoepithelial cells (white arrow), and fibrovascular stroma (S). (H and E, x100)

 

Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Intraductal papilloma commonly presents with nipple discharge. The lesion typically arises from the major duct located in the subareolar region. Papilloma usually measures 2-3 mm in diameter and can extend along the duct for several centimeters. Microscopically, papillomas are characterized by formation of epithelial fronds supported by fibrovascular stroma. Epithelial cells line the luminal aspect of the papillae, and a myoepithelial cell layer is invariably present between epithelial cells and the basement membrane [2]. Mammography is usually unable to detect the papilloma. However, abnormalities that can be seen and should be suggestive of this diagnosis include subareolar nodules, subareolar amorphous coarse calcifications, and sometimes an asymmetrically dilated duct [3]. Conventional ductography has been the method of choice for evaluating mammary ducts. Common ductographic findings for intraductal papilloma include intraductal filling defects, complete ductal obstruction, ductal expansion with apparent distortion, and irregularity of the ductal wall [3, 4]. Even when lesions are detected, reliable separation of benign and malignant lesions is not possible [5, 6]. Ductography results in a high false-positive rate (20%) [7]. Furthermore, insertion of a cannula and contrast material into the discharging duct is required, and discharge should thus be present on the day of ductography so the cannula can be placed in the appropriate duct. Injection of contrast material is not always successful, and the procedure can be painful and time-consuming.

Detection of intraductal papilloma is also possible using MRI. However, MRI using a conventional coil cannot detect small lesions. In a study by Rovno et al. [8], most papillomas (16/23) were occult on MRI, a finding explained by the small size of papillomas that were undetected on MRI. In that same study and one by Orel et al. [9], slice thickness was 2-3 mm and resolution was 300-700 µm. However, in our study using a microscopic coil, slice thickness was 1.6 mm, providing a high spatial resolution of 0.137 mm suitable for the detection of small lesions. All papillomas were detected by MR ductography using a microscopic coil. The minimum diameter of ducts detected was 2 mm, and the minimum papilloma diameter was 3 mm. MR ductography using a microscopic coil can detect ducts measuring 0.8 mm and intraductal lesions as small as 1.0 mm [1]. This ultrahigh resolution allows very fine images.

Ductal dilatation was identified in all cases of intraductal papilloma, with or without the history of nipple discharge. Ductal dilatation thus represents one of the important findings in cases of intraductal papilloma. Most cases (12/18) showed distal duct dilatation.

Signal hyperintensity of the duct on T1-weighted fat-saturation imaging and clinical correlations were explained by hemorrhagic content of the duct. A possible explanation for signal hyperintensity of the duct on T2-weighted imaging includes age of the hemorrhage. Different ages of hemorrhage result in different signal intensities of the duct on T2-weighted imaging.

In almost all cases, the papilloma appeared as a well-circumscribed mass (16/18), with most homogeneously enhanced in the early phase (17/18) and washed out in the delayed phase (13/18). Early enhancement and delayed washout may be attributable to a papilloma rich in fibrovascular stroma. Similarly, intraductal papilloma has been described without using a microscopic coil as a well-circumscribed enhancing mass associated with duct dilation on MRI [8-11]; these procedures have not provided sufficient information regarding patterns of enhancement. Our study revealed a similar enhancing pattern for even the smallest papilloma (3 mm). This enhancing pattern is thus a fundamental characteristic of papilloma.

Our study has a few limitations. We only investigated a surgically confirmed population. Although smaller (2-3 mm) papillomas are common, papillomas less than 3 mm in diameter could not be investigated, as no papillomas in the study population were that size. Although no specific criteria exist for the selection of patients for surgery in cases of intraductal papilloma at our hospital, surgeons usually do not perform operations on smallsize suspected intraductal papillomas; they recommend that these patients undergo follow-up examinations. Because of this, we failed to include the more common smallsized papillomas in our study. Our study did not provide information about discrimination between benign and malignant lesions regarding their pattern of enhancement because of the limited number in the study group. Further study is necessary to clarify the difference between them.

In conclusion, MR ductography using a microscopic coil offers a better technique for detection of intraductal papilloma than conventional breast MRI. The majority of intraductal papillomas in our study on MR ductography using a microscopic coil appeared as well-circumscribed masses homogeneously enhanced in the early phase and washed out in the delay phase. The papillomas were associated with dilated ducts showing signal hyperintensity on T1- and T2-weighted imaging.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Kamemaki Y, Kurihara Y, Itoh D, et al. MR mammary ductography using a microscopic coil for assessment of intraductal lesions. AJR 2004; 182:1340 -1342[Free Full Text]
  2. Fattaneh A, Tavassoli. Pathology of the breast, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams& Wilkins,1999
  3. Cardenosa G, Eklund GW. Benign papillary neoplasm of the breast: mammographic findings. Radiology 1991;181 : 751-755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cardnosa G, Doudna C, Eklund GW. Ductography of the breast: technique and findings. AJR 1994;162 : 1081-1087[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Simmons R, Adamovich T, Brennan M, et al. Nonsurgical evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol2003; 10:113 -116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Dawes LG, Bowen C, Venta LA, et al. Nonpalpable breast cancer with nipple discharge: no replacement for ductal excision. Surgery 1998; 124:685 -691[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Baker KS, Davery DD, Stelling CB. Ductal abnormalities detected with galactography: frequency of adequate excisional biopsy. AJR 1994; 162:821 -824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rovno S, Sigelman ES, Reynolds C, et al. Solitary intraductal papilloma: findings at MR imaging and MR galactography. AJR 1999; 172:151 -155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C, et al. MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology2000; 216:248 -254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Daniel LB, Gardner WR, Birdwell LR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papilloma of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21:887 -892[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Francis A, England D, Rowlands D, et al. Breast papilloma: mammogram, ultrasound and MRI appearances. Breast2002; 11:394 -397[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Schwab, M. Uder, R. Schulz-Wendtland, W. A. Bautz, R. Janka, and E. Wenkel
Direct MR Galactography: Feasibility Study
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 54 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
radtechHome page
T. G. ODLE
Breast MR
Radiol. Technol., September 1, 2006; 78(1): 45M - 66M.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattarai, N.
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhattarai, N.
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS