|
|
||||||||
Clinical Observations |
1 Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British
Columbia, 899 W 12th Ave., Vancouver V5Z 1M9, Canada.
2 Department of Radiology and Medical Physics, Osaka University Graduate School
of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, 565-0825, Japan.
3 National Kinki Chuo Hospital for Chest Disease, Sakai City, Osaka, 591-8555,
Japan.
Received December 3, 2004;
accepted after revision January 27, 2005.
Address correspondence to N. L. Müller.
Abstract
|
|
|---|
CONCLUSION. Drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonias usually manifest as areas of consolidation and ground-glass opacity most commonly involving the outer third of the lungs.
Keywords: chest drug reaction eosinophilic pneumonia high-resolution CT lung lung diseases
|
|
|---|
Eosinophilic pneumonia is a well-recognized pattern of drug reaction. Diagnosis is based on the presence of parenchymal opacification on the chest radiograph, peripheral eosinophilia, and eosinophilic infiltration of the lung parenchyma, associated with administration of a known drug and in the absence of other causes of pulmonary disease [3-8]. Early diagnosis is important because discontinuation of the offending drug reduces morbidity and mortality.
High-resolution CT has an important role in the diagnosis of diffuse lung diseases, allowing earlier detection and better characterization of the abnormalities than does chest radiography [1, 6, 7]. The high-resolution CT manifestations of eosinophilic lung diseases have been described in several studies [1, 2, 9]. However, the literature has little information about the high-resolution CT findings of drug-related eosinophilic pneumonias.
The purpose of the present study was to review the high-resolution CT findings of biopsy-proven drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia.
|
|
|---|
|
All patients presented with nonspecific respiratory symptoms and pulmonary opacities on radiographs during administration of a single drug (n =12) or multiple drugs (n = 2). The two patients receiving multiple-drug therapy were a patient with Hodgkin's disease and a patient with tuberculosis. In these two patients, the drug responsible for the reaction was identified by discontinuing the drug suspected of causing the eosinophilic reaction and observing rapid patient improvement. The interval between the initiation of drug therapy and the onset of symptoms ranged from 1 to 42 days (mean, 8.7 days; median, 4 days) (Table 1). Diagnosis of drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia was based on clinical history and histologic findings obtained by transbronchial biopsy (n = 10) or surgical biopsy (n = 4). Other infectious and noninfectious causes of eosinophilic lung disease were excluded by laboratory tests and clinical history. Blood eosinophilia (eosinophils > 5%) was present in 12 (86%) of 14 patients.
High-resolution CT scans were obtained on a variety of scanners, using 1- to 2-mm collimation at 10-mm intervals. The images were obtained with the patient in the supine position at the end of inspiration and reconstructed using a high-spatial-frequency algorithm. The high-resolution CT images (window level, -600 to -700 H; window width; 1,000-1,500 H) were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists for the presence, extent, and anatomic distribution of parenchymal abnormalities. The observers recorded the predominant abnormality (ground-glass opacity, consolidation, or nodules) and the associated findings (ground-glass opacity, consolidation, nodules, interlobular septal thickening, or reticulation) in accord with the definitions proposed by the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society [10]. Nodules were classified according to their size (< 5, 5-10, or > 10 mm), number (< 10 or 3 10), and anatomic distribution (centrilobular, peribronchovascular, or random). The anatomic distribution of abnormalities was classified as central if predominant in the inner third of the lungs, peripheral if predominant in the outer third of the lungs, or random if there was no predominance. Zonal predominance was classified as upper when most of the abnormalities were above the level of the tracheal carina, lower when most of the abnormalities were below this level, or random when no zonal predominance was noted. The overall extent of abnormalities was classified as involving less than 25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, or more than 75% of lung parenchyma. Decisions about presence, distribution, and extent of abnormalities were reached by consensus between the two radiologists. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of one of the three centers participating in the study; no approval is required for retrospective studies in the other two institutions.
The high-resolution CT examinations were performed within 2-30 days (mean, 11 days; median, 7 days) after the initiation of drug administration and within 1-10 days (mean, 4 days; median, 3 days) after the onset of symptoms. The interval between the high-resolution CT scans and the biopsy ranged from 1 to 7 days (mean, 3 days; median, 2 days).
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Associated parenchymal findings included nodules, interlobular septal thickening, and reticulation. Multiple nodules (> 10) were present in eight (57%) of 14 patients, and all these nodules were of small size (< 5 mm) and centrilobular distribution (Fig. 3A). Interlobular septal thickening, which was found in six (43%) of 14 patients, was generally mild with no zonal predominance (Fig. 3B). Bilateral reticulation was seen in three patients (21%), in all of whom it was mild and randomly distributed (Fig. 4A).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
Eosinophilic pneumonia is a common pattern of drug-related lung injury [3-8, 11-13] and may be caused by a number of agents. As of November 2004, approximately 115 drugs had been reported as causes of eosinophilic lung disease [14]. The most common are summarized in Table 3. In our series, nine of 14 patients were receiving drugs with a relatively commonly associated eosinophilic reaction and four patients were receiving drugs described as causing an eosinophilic drug reaction in only a few cases (ethambutol, sodium cromoglycate, cefaclor, and 5-aminosalicylic acid) [7]. We describe a case of eosinophilic reaction secondary to aldose reductase inhibitor, an association to our knowledge not previously reported (Table 1).
|
Drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonias may be acute in onset or may have an insidious course with progression for months after therapy institution [4, 8]. Lung injury is unrelated to the cumulative dose. Acute disease is usually mild and self-limited. In the chronic form, presentation varies from minimally symptomatic to severe illness, with high fever, dyspnea, chills, malaise, and weight loss [4, 15]. Prognosis is good if the offending drug is stopped; in some cases, however, treatment with corticosteroids is required [8, 13]. In our series, three patients improved with discontinuation of the causative drug and 11 required corticosteroid therapy. Both acute and chronic forms are characterized pathologically by infiltration of the alveolar air spaces and interstitium with eosinophils and lymphocytes [3, 4, 7, 12]. Biopsy is often required to establish the definitive diagnosis. In clinical practice, however, diagnosis is usually based on clinical symptoms, the presence of parenchymal opacities on the chest radiograph or CT scan, and increased eosinophils in the blood or in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Lymphocyte stimulation testing is frequently positive and may be helpful in the diagnosis [1, 2, 16]. Although characteristic, the presence of peripheral eosinophilia is quite variable, having been described in approximately 40% of patients [13, 17, 18]. In our series, 86% of patients had blood eosinophilia.
Air-space consolidation, areas of ground-glass attenuation, nodules, and irregular lines have been described as high-resolution CT manifestations of drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonias [1, 7, 9, 19]. In our series, bilateral areas of consolidation and ground-glass opacities were the most common manifestations, present in all patients. A predominantly peripheral distribution was seen in 72% of patients, involving mainly the upper lung zones in 50%. Ancillary findings included small centrilobular nodules, present in 57% of patients; interlobular septal thickening; and reticulation.
In comparison with the previously published data on the CT appearance of eosinophilic lung diseases, the majority of our patients (10/14) showed findings resembling those of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia that is, bilateral air-space consolidation and ground-glass opacities in a peripheral distribution, often involving the middle and upper lung zones [1, 7, 20-22]. Poorly defined centrilobular nodules and septal lines have been described more commonly in acute eosinophilic pneumonitis, in which parenchymal opacities tend to be extensive and do not have a zonal predominance [1, 2, 9, 19, 23]. The remaining patients (4/14) in the current study showed predominantly central or random distribution of ground-glass opacities or consolidation.
In five patients, areas of air-space consolidation had a perilobular distribution appearing as a crescent-shaped dense consolidation surrounding an area of ground-glass attenuation. This finding resembles the "reverse halo" sign described in association with bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia [24]. A reaction similar to bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia may be associated with a variety of pathologic processes, including drug reactions [12]. In the current study, however, histologic findings showed only eosinophilic pneumonia.
Our study had several limitations. It was retrospective and included few patients. Although diagnosis was proven by biopsy, in the majority of patients this was limited to transbronchial biopsy. Therefore, although the biopsy specimens showed findings consistent only with an eosinophilic drug reaction, it is possible that other types of reaction may have been missed.
In summary, the high-resolution CT findings of drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonias, consisting of air-space consolidation and ground-glass attenuation in a predominantly peripheral distribution, are similar to those of eosinophilic pneumonias of other causes. The diagnosis of drug-induced injury requires a high index of suspicion and careful clinical correlation, a history of exposure to a drug known to induce eosinophilia, and exclusion of other causes of eosinophilic lung disease.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. J. Jeong, K.-I. Kim, I. J. Seo, C. H. Lee, K. N. Lee, K. N. Kim, J. S. Kim, and W. J. Kwon Eosinophilic Lung Diseases: A Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Overview RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 617 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |