AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Souza, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Akira, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Souza, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Akira, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1847
AJR 2006; 186:368-373
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Drug-Induced Eosinophilic Pneumonia: High-Resolution CT Findings in 14 Patients

Carolina A. Souza1, Nestor L. Müller1, Takeshi Johkoh2 and Masanori Akira3

1 Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 899 W 12th Ave., Vancouver V5Z 1M9, Canada.
2 Department of Radiology and Medical Physics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, 565-0825, Japan.
3 National Kinki Chuo Hospital for Chest Disease, Sakai City, Osaka, 591-8555, Japan.

Received December 3, 2004; accepted after revision January 27, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to N. L. Müller.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the high-resolution CT findings of drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonias.

CONCLUSION. Drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonias usually manifest as areas of consolidation and ground-glass opacity most commonly involving the outer third of the lungs.

Keywords: chest • drug reaction • eosinophilic pneumonia • high-resolution CT • lung • lung diseases


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Eosinophilic lung diseases are a group of disorders characterized pathologically by the presence of eosinophils in the alveoli and pulmonary interstitium. They may be divided into those of unknown cause and those related to a defined cause including parasitic infestation, fungal infection, and drug reaction [1, 2].

Eosinophilic pneumonia is a well-recognized pattern of drug reaction. Diagnosis is based on the presence of parenchymal opacification on the chest radiograph, peripheral eosinophilia, and eosinophilic infiltration of the lung parenchyma, associated with administration of a known drug and in the absence of other causes of pulmonary disease [3-8]. Early diagnosis is important because discontinuation of the offending drug reduces morbidity and mortality.

High-resolution CT has an important role in the diagnosis of diffuse lung diseases, allowing earlier detection and better characterization of the abnormalities than does chest radiography [1, 6, 7]. The high-resolution CT manifestations of eosinophilic lung diseases have been described in several studies [1, 2, 9]. However, the literature has little information about the high-resolution CT findings of drug-related eosinophilic pneumonias.

The purpose of the present study was to review the high-resolution CT findings of biopsy-proven drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The study included 14 consecutive patients (nine men and five women; age range, 29-81 years; mean, 53.3 years) with proven drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia who had undergone high-resolution CT of the chest at one of our three institutions. The underlying disease and the offending drug for each patient are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Causative Drug, Underlying Disease, Blood Eosinophil Count, and High-Resolution CT (HRCT) Findings for Each Patient

 

All patients presented with nonspecific respiratory symptoms and pulmonary opacities on radiographs during administration of a single drug (n =12) or multiple drugs (n = 2). The two patients receiving multiple-drug therapy were a patient with Hodgkin's disease and a patient with tuberculosis. In these two patients, the drug responsible for the reaction was identified by discontinuing the drug suspected of causing the eosinophilic reaction and observing rapid patient improvement. The interval between the initiation of drug therapy and the onset of symptoms ranged from 1 to 42 days (mean, 8.7 days; median, 4 days) (Table 1). Diagnosis of drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia was based on clinical history and histologic findings obtained by transbronchial biopsy (n = 10) or surgical biopsy (n = 4). Other infectious and noninfectious causes of eosinophilic lung disease were excluded by laboratory tests and clinical history. Blood eosinophilia (eosinophils > 5%) was present in 12 (86%) of 14 patients.

High-resolution CT scans were obtained on a variety of scanners, using 1- to 2-mm collimation at 10-mm intervals. The images were obtained with the patient in the supine position at the end of inspiration and reconstructed using a high-spatial-frequency algorithm. The high-resolution CT images (window level, -600 to -700 H; window width; 1,000-1,500 H) were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists for the presence, extent, and anatomic distribution of parenchymal abnormalities. The observers recorded the predominant abnormality (ground-glass opacity, consolidation, or nodules) and the associated findings (ground-glass opacity, consolidation, nodules, interlobular septal thickening, or reticulation) in accord with the definitions proposed by the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society [10]. Nodules were classified according to their size (< 5, 5-10, or > 10 mm), number (< 10 or 3 10), and anatomic distribution (centrilobular, peribronchovascular, or random). The anatomic distribution of abnormalities was classified as central if predominant in the inner third of the lungs, peripheral if predominant in the outer third of the lungs, or random if there was no predominance. Zonal predominance was classified as upper when most of the abnormalities were above the level of the tracheal carina, lower when most of the abnormalities were below this level, or random when no zonal predominance was noted. The overall extent of abnormalities was classified as involving less than 25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, or more than 75% of lung parenchyma. Decisions about presence, distribution, and extent of abnormalities were reached by consensus between the two radiologists. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of one of the three centers participating in the study; no approval is required for retrospective studies in the other two institutions.

The high-resolution CT examinations were performed within 2-30 days (mean, 11 days; median, 7 days) after the initiation of drug administration and within 1-10 days (mean, 4 days; median, 3 days) after the onset of symptoms. The interval between the high-resolution CT scans and the biopsy ranged from 1 to 7 days (mean, 3 days; median, 2 days).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Table 2 summarizes the high-resolution CT findings. All 14 patients had parenchymal abnormalities on high-resolution CT scans, including air-space consolidation (n = 14) and ground-glass opacities (n = 12). Air-space consolidation was the predominant abnormality in 11 patients (79%) and ground-glass opacity in three patients (21%) (Figs. 1 and 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: High-Resolution CT (HRCT) Findings

 

Figure 1
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 —High-resolution CT scan of 49-year-old woman receiving sodium cromoglycate for asthma shows air-space consolidation in periphery of right upper lobe.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 —High-resolution CT scan of 81-year-old man receiving 5-aminosalicylic acid for colitis shows extensive bilateral air-space consolidation and ground-glass opacity. Mild septal thickening is seen in anterior aspects of both lungs (arrows).

 

Associated parenchymal findings included nodules, interlobular septal thickening, and reticulation. Multiple nodules (> 10) were present in eight (57%) of 14 patients, and all these nodules were of small size (< 5 mm) and centrilobular distribution (Fig. 3A). Interlobular septal thickening, which was found in six (43%) of 14 patients, was generally mild with no zonal predominance (Fig. 3B). Bilateral reticulation was seen in three patients (21%), in all of whom it was mild and randomly distributed (Fig. 4A).


Figure 3
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —31-year-old woman receiving minocycline for sinusitis. High-resolution CT scan shows patchy ground-glass opacity and mild consolidation in a peripheral distribution. Also seen are small centrilobular nodules (straight arrows) and nodular thickening of lobular septa and major fissure (curved arrows).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —31-year-old woman receiving minocycline for sinusitis. High-resolution CT scan at a lower level shows septal lines (arrows).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —50-year-old man receiving methotrexate therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. High-resolution CT scan shows area of ground-glass opacity and reticulation in periphery of left upper lobe. Also seen are a few small nodules (arrows).

 
The abnormalities were bilateral and asymmetric in all patients and were mainly in the peripheral lung regions in 10 patients (71%) (Fig. 4B), in the central lung regions in three (21%), and random in one (7%). The abnormalities involved mainly the upper lung zones in seven patients (50%), the lower lung zones in one (7%), and all lung zones to similar extent in six (43%). Five patients had areas of air-space consolidation in a perilobular distribution surrounding an area of ground-glass attenuation (Fig. 5). The overall extent of abnormalities was less than 25% of the lung parenchyma in five patients, 25-50% in two, 50-75% in three, and more than 75% in four.


Figure 6
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —50-year-old man receiving methotrexate therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. High-resolution CT scan at a lower level shows patchy areas of consolidation and ground-glass opacity in a peripheral distribution.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 —High-resolution CT scan of 47-year-old man receiving phenytoin for seizures shows patchy bilateral air-space consolidation in a peripheral distribution. Focal area of ground-glass opacity surrounded by crescent-shaped consolidation ("reverse halo" sign) is seen in left lung (arrow).

 
All 14 patients had a good outcome. In three patients the parenchymal abnormalities cleared with discontinuation of the drug. In the remaining 11 patients, improvement was observed after corticosteroid therapy.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Several studies have emphasized the importance of drug reactions [3-8, 11, 12]. The lung is one of the most commonly involved organs, and drug-induced pulmonary injury may be an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Drug reactions in the lung may result in a variety of histologic patterns, including diffuse alveolar damage, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia, pulmonary hemorrhage, and eosinophilic pneumonia [3-8]. Classification of drug-induced lung diseases according to the pathologic pattern is useful because clinical and radiologic manifestations often reflect the underlying histology [7, 13].

Eosinophilic pneumonia is a common pattern of drug-related lung injury [3-8, 11-13] and may be caused by a number of agents. As of November 2004, approximately 115 drugs had been reported as causes of eosinophilic lung disease [14]. The most common are summarized in Table 3. In our series, nine of 14 patients were receiving drugs with a relatively commonly associated eosinophilic reaction and four patients were receiving drugs described as causing an eosinophilic drug reaction in only a few cases (ethambutol, sodium cromoglycate, cefaclor, and 5-aminosalicylic acid) [7]. We describe a case of eosinophilic reaction secondary to aldose reductase inhibitor, an association to our knowledge not previously reported (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3: Drugs Associated with Eosinophilic Lung Disease

 

Drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonias may be acute in onset or may have an insidious course with progression for months after therapy institution [4, 8]. Lung injury is unrelated to the cumulative dose. Acute disease is usually mild and self-limited. In the chronic form, presentation varies from minimally symptomatic to severe illness, with high fever, dyspnea, chills, malaise, and weight loss [4, 15]. Prognosis is good if the offending drug is stopped; in some cases, however, treatment with corticosteroids is required [8, 13]. In our series, three patients improved with discontinuation of the causative drug and 11 required corticosteroid therapy. Both acute and chronic forms are characterized pathologically by infiltration of the alveolar air spaces and interstitium with eosinophils and lymphocytes [3, 4, 7, 12]. Biopsy is often required to establish the definitive diagnosis. In clinical practice, however, diagnosis is usually based on clinical symptoms, the presence of parenchymal opacities on the chest radiograph or CT scan, and increased eosinophils in the blood or in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Lymphocyte stimulation testing is frequently positive and may be helpful in the diagnosis [1, 2, 16]. Although characteristic, the presence of peripheral eosinophilia is quite variable, having been described in approximately 40% of patients [13, 17, 18]. In our series, 86% of patients had blood eosinophilia.

Air-space consolidation, areas of ground-glass attenuation, nodules, and irregular lines have been described as high-resolution CT manifestations of drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonias [1, 7, 9, 19]. In our series, bilateral areas of consolidation and ground-glass opacities were the most common manifestations, present in all patients. A predominantly peripheral distribution was seen in 72% of patients, involving mainly the upper lung zones in 50%. Ancillary findings included small centrilobular nodules, present in 57% of patients; interlobular septal thickening; and reticulation.

In comparison with the previously published data on the CT appearance of eosinophilic lung diseases, the majority of our patients (10/14) showed findings resembling those of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia— that is, bilateral air-space consolidation and ground-glass opacities in a peripheral distribution, often involving the middle and upper lung zones [1, 7, 20-22]. Poorly defined centrilobular nodules and septal lines have been described more commonly in acute eosinophilic pneumonitis, in which parenchymal opacities tend to be extensive and do not have a zonal predominance [1, 2, 9, 19, 23]. The remaining patients (4/14) in the current study showed predominantly central or random distribution of ground-glass opacities or consolidation.

In five patients, areas of air-space consolidation had a perilobular distribution appearing as a crescent-shaped dense consolidation surrounding an area of ground-glass attenuation. This finding resembles the "reverse halo" sign described in association with bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia [24]. A reaction similar to bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia may be associated with a variety of pathologic processes, including drug reactions [12]. In the current study, however, histologic findings showed only eosinophilic pneumonia.

Our study had several limitations. It was retrospective and included few patients. Although diagnosis was proven by biopsy, in the majority of patients this was limited to transbronchial biopsy. Therefore, although the biopsy specimens showed findings consistent only with an eosinophilic drug reaction, it is possible that other types of reaction may have been missed.

In summary, the high-resolution CT findings of drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonias, consisting of air-space consolidation and ground-glass attenuation in a predominantly peripheral distribution, are similar to those of eosinophilic pneumonias of other causes. The diagnosis of drug-induced injury requires a high index of suspicion and careful clinical correlation, a history of exposure to a drug known to induce eosinophilia, and exclusion of other causes of eosinophilic lung disease.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Johkoh T, Müller NL, Akira M, et al. Eosinophilic lung diseases: diagnostic accuracy of thin-section CT in 111 patients. Radiology 2000;216 : 773-780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Allen JN, Davis WB. Eosinophilic lung diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150 : 1423-1438[Medline]
  3. Pietra GG. Pathologic mechanisms of drug-induced lung disorders. J Thorac Imaging 1991;6 : 1-7[Medline]
  4. Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Rossi SE. Drug-induced lung injury. Semin Roentgenol 2002;37 : 72-81[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Smith GJ. The histopathology of pulmonary reactions to drugs. Clin Chest Med 1990;11 : 95-117[Medline]
  6. Kuhlman JE. The role of chest computed tomography in the diagnosis of drug-related reactions. J Thorac Imaging1991; 6:52 -61[Medline]
  7. Cleverley JR, Screaton NJ, Hiorns MP, Flint JD, Müller NL. Drug-induced lung disease: high-resolution CT and histological findings. Clin Radiol 2002;57 : 292-299[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Rossi SE, Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Sporn TA, Goodman PC. Pulmonary drug toxicity: radiologic and pathologic manifestations. RadioGraphics 2000;20 : 1245-1259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kim Y, Lee KS, Choi DC, Primack SL, Im JG. The spectrum of eosinophilic lung disease: radiologic findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:920 -930[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Austin JH, Müller NL, Friedman PJ, et al. Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 1996;200 : 327-331[Free Full Text]
  11. Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Rossi SE. High-resolution CT of drug-induced lung disease. Radiol Clin North Am2002; 40:61 -72[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Rosenow EC, Myers JL, Swensen SJ, Pisani RJ. Drug-induced pulmonary disease: an update. Chest 1992;102 : 239-250[Free Full Text]
  13. Müller NL, White DA, Jiang H, Gemma A. Diagnosis and management of drug-associated interstitial lung disease. Br J Cancer 2004; 91[suppl 2]:S24 -S30
  14. Foucher P, Camus P. Pneumotox on line: the drug-induced lung diseases. Available at: www.pneumotox.com. Accessed July 31, 2005
  15. Carrington CB, Addington WW, Goff AM, et al. Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1969;280 : 787-798[Medline]
  16. Allen JN, Pacht ER, Gadek JE, Davis WB. Acute eosinophilic pneumonia as a reversible cause of noninfectious respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 1989;321 : 569-574[Abstract]
  17. Cooper JA Jr, White DA, Matthay RA. Drug-induced pulmonary disease. Part 2. Noncytotoxic drugs. Am Rev Respir Dis1986; 133:488 -503[Medline]
  18. Cooper JAD, White DA, Matthay RA. Drug-induced pulmonary disease. Part 1. Cytotoxic drugs. Am Rev Respir Dis1986; 133:321 -340[Medline]
  19. Padley SP, Adler B, Hansell DM, Müller NL. High-resolution computed tomography of drug-induced lung disease. Clin Radiol 1992; 46:232 -236[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Mayo JR, Müller NL, Road J, Sisler J, Lillington G. Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: CT findings in six cases. AJR1989; 153:727 -730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ebara H, Ikezoe J, Johkoh T, et al. Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: evolution of chest radiograms and CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18:737 -744[Medline]
  22. Arakawa H, Kurihara Y, Niimi H, Nakajima Y, Johkoh T, Nakamura H. Bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia versus chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: high-resolution CT findings in 81 patients. AJR 2001; 176:1053 -1058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Tomiyama N, Müller NL, Johkoh T, et al. Acute parenchymal lung disease in immunocompetent patients: diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution CT. AJR 2000; 174:1745 -1750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Kim SJ, Lee KS, Ryu YH, et al. Reversed halo sign on high-resolution CT of cryptogenic organizing pneumonia: diagnostic implications. AJR 2003;180 : 1251-1254[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. J. Jeong, K.-I. Kim, I. J. Seo, C. H. Lee, K. N. Lee, K. N. Kim, J. S. Kim, and W. J. Kwon
Eosinophilic Lung Diseases: A Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Overview
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 617 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Souza, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Akira, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Souza, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Akira, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS