AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

The following table or figure may be downloaded to PowerPoint for personal use in teaching and presentations. This feature is available to all subscribers to the journal.

You MUST read and follow the guidelines at Request to Reproduce AJR Content if you are distributing or using AJR content beyond academic use (limited distribution, non-revenue producing, or educational purposes).

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Fig. 3 —Bar graph with SD error bars shows mean vessel scores by degree of stenosis: mild-grade stenosis or normal (0-29%), n = 44; moderate-grade stenosis (30-59%), n = 15; and high-grade stenosis (60%), n = 43. Vessels with high- and moderate-grade stenosis had significantly higher scores than those with mild-grade stenosis or normal vessels (p < 0.005). There was no significant difference between scores of high- and moderate-grade stenotic vessels (p = 0.82). Asterisks indicate p < 0.05.





Right arrow Return to article
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS